Economy |
Gulf AI giant moves into US amid tech rivalry |
2025-05-06 |
[RT] The UAE-backed G42 group’s reported expansion plans come amid growing AI competition, with China and others closing the gap with the US The United Arab Emirates’ artificial intelligence group G42, backed by Abu Dhabi’s state-owned Mubadala investment company, is set to expand into the US, Financial Times has reported, citing corporate filings. It plans to invest tens of billions of dollars to establish itself in the market, the newspaper said. While the US has dominated the domain, as well as the semiconductor segment, more and more nations are making concerted efforts to develop and promote globally indigenous AI technologies and chips. In an article on Sunday, FT quoted a G42 representative as confirming that it is “committed to the USA market expansion and has established a legal entity towards that strategy.” The publication noted that the AI company is chaired by the UAE’s national security adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al-Nahyan, who has spearheaded the country’s AI-centered economic diversification push. Last April, Microsoft pledged to invest $1.5 billion into G42 in exchange for a minority stake in the UAE group, which has also attracted other US investors, including Ray Dalio’s family office and private equity firm Silver Lake. In 2023, G42 announced it was cutting ties with Chinese hardware suppliers such as Huawei in favor of their American competitors to ensure compliance with US regulations. As recently as January, the debut of DeepSeek in China cast doubt on the dominance of US-based ChatGPT. Unlike its American rival, the Chinese model is freely available without a subscription, and swiftly became the most downloaded app on Apple’s and Google’s stores in nearly 60 countries. On top of that, it is said to be far less expensive to run compared to ChatGPT. Back in March, researchers from the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) unveiled a new superconducting quantum computing prototype, which is said to be a million times faster than Google’s top quantum processors. The Chinese chip, named Zuchongzhi-3, is also a quadrillion times more efficient than any conventionally built supercomputer, according to its developers. In February, the newspaper Mint, citing Indian officials, claimed that New Delhi was developing its own artificial intelligence chip from scratch, with a view to reducing the country’s dependence on Western tech companies by 2027. Related: G42 04/30/2025 Facebook blocks Charles Town, WV city council candidate's page with no further appeal G42 04/08/2025 Trump says furniture makers coming back to North Carolina as Canadian company moves to state G42 03/20/2025 Hamas mourns number of governmental officers claimed by Israeli resumed aggression on Gaza |
Link |
Cyber |
U.S. Restricts Export of Chips Used by China's DeepSeek AI |
2025-04-17 |
[Breitbart] The Trump administration on Monday informed U.S. chipmaker Nvidia that exports of its powerful H20 chips to China, and several other nations, will have to meet new licensing requirements. Nvidia said meeting the restrictions could cost the company up to $5.5 billion. Nvidia was informed the new licensing requirement, which will remain in place indefinitely, “addresses the risk that the covered products may be used in, or diverted to, a supercomputer in China.” The H20 chip is not the most powerful product in Nvidia’s inventory – but, until now, it has been the most powerful chip Nvidia could legally sell to China. The Biden administration restricted the sale of more advanced chips to China in 2022. Nvidia worked around the restriction by reducing the capabilities of its popular H100 chip until it fell below the export limit and created the H20, a product sold only to China. China used the H20 to create DeepSeek, a new artificial intelligence (AI) that rattled world markets when it was introduced late last year because it offered high-level performance at a fraction of the price. According to its creators, one reason DeepSeek was developed so cheaply was that its physical architecture employed those inexpensive Nvidia chips. The sensational debut of DeepSeek prompted Chinese tech companies to order more than $16 billion worth of H20 chips. Nvidia accordingly stepped-up production and now fears it will have a backlog of inventory it cannot sell, since there is no demand for the H20 outside of China. The unique nature of the H20 could alleviate that problem somewhat, since some of the frozen export inventory could be H100 chips that have not yet been “throttled” down to the lower H20 specifications. A bigger long-term problem is that losing access to the H20 could prompt China to develop a comparable chip domestically, probably through electronics titan Huawei, potentially causing Nvidia to lose its lucrative Chinese market for good. Nvidia posted $17 billion in sales to China last year. “Banning the H20 makes little sense to us. H20 performance is low, well below already-available Chinese alternatives; a ban essentially simply hands the Chinese AI market over to Huawei,” analyst Stacy Rasgon told investors Wednesday. The left-wing New York Times (NYT) on Wednesday noted the politics of the Nvidia situation are complicated, as leading Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts is strongly in favor of restricting H20 sales to China. Warren wrote a letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Monday urging restrictions on H20 sales without “further delay” because she felt even the throttled-down chip sold to China was powerful enough to jeopardize U.S. national security, and because U.S. companies are having difficulty sourcing all of the artificial intelligence chips they need. Nvidia’s position on the matter also seems delicate, as CEO Jensen Huang invested considerable effort in blocking export restrictions on the company’s chips. Just one day before the new restrictions were announced, the White House applauded Nvidia for committing $500 billion to manufacture AI equipment in the United States. Nvidia shares were down seven percent on Wednesday after news of the export restrictions broke. The Nvidia H20 was not the only electronics export to China that was restricted on Monday; another company, Advanced Micro Devices, also slipped seven percent on Wednesday due to export restrictions, while chipmakers like Qualcomm lost two to three percent of their value. Related: Nvidia 04/15/2025 Nvidia announces plans to make AI supercomputers in US for first time Nvidia 03/21/2025 AI chipmaker Nvidia to invest billions in US amid Trump onshoring push: CEO Nvidia 03/14/2025 Freed hostage says he saw Avinatan Or alive in captivity, marking first sign of life |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Anti-Trump ‘Resistance' Leader's Campaign Bankrolled By Dem Power Broker Tied To Chinese Intel Agency |
2025-04-15 |
[DailyCaller] Boston Democratic Mayor Michelle Wu’s 2021 campaign received hundreds of thousands of dollars from a fundraiser who is listed by a Chinese intelligence agency as an official, a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation discovered. Gary Yu, the founder of Boston International Media Consulting, helped raise over $300,000 for Wu with the help of a Chinese civic association he leads. However, Yu — whose Chinese name is Yu Guoliang — is listed as an official by an agency of a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence and intelligence service called the United Front Work Department (UFWD), and also operates as a recruiter for the Chinese government, according to reports from the CCP, Chinese state media and civic associations led by Yu. "The Communist Party’s UFWD never rests," author and China expert Gordon Chang told the DCNF. "There is no ethnic Chinese official in America who is not targeted. It’s time for law enforcement to investigate the CCP’s ties to Gary Yu and Yu’s ties to Mayor Michelle Wu." Wu has risen to national prominence as a central figure in the Democratic resistance to Trump’s border and deportation policies. Wu recently defended her city’s refusal to cooperate with immigration officials during her March 19, 2025 "State of the City" address, during which she criticized "presidents who think they are kings," prompting the White House to fire back the next day with a press release labeling Wu a "radical mayor" who "puts violent criminal illegal aliens first." "Wu’s ultra-leftism makes her the perfect candidate for CCP recruitment and capture," Chang said. "Or do we have it backward? Is her ultra-leftism the result of CCP recruitment and capture? More than just the people of Boston would like to know." Wu’s office, Yu, and Boston International Media Consulting did not respond to multiple requests for comment. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: Pentagon, Energy Dept. Nuclear Research Projects Tapped Sanctioned Chinese Communist Party Supercomputers) ’OVERSEAS CHINESE’ Yu has repeatedly met with high-ranking CCP intelligence leaders in China and is listed as an official by two regional branches of a UFWD arm, according to Chinese government announcements, state media reports and records from Chinese civic associations led by Yu. The UFWD’s operations are a "unique blend of engagement, influence activities, and intelligence operations that the [CCP] uses to shape its political environment, including to influence other countries’ policy toward the [People’s Republic of China] and to gain access to advanced foreign technology," according to the House Select Committee on the CCP. Yu is identified as an "overseas committee member" by the Hangzhou municipal All-China Federation Of Returned Overseas Chinese (ACFROC) branch in Zhejiang province and has met with their officials in China multiple times, according to the website of the North American Hangzhou Association (NAHAUS), where Yu serves as chairman. ACFROC is a UFWD agency specializing in overseas influence operations, including allegedly directing Chinese community leaders to illegally establish a secret Chinese police station in New York City. "China’s strategy to influence state and local policymakers is executed, in part, through hundreds of ostensibly ’civil society’ organizations that are actually affiliated with the CCP’s UFWD," Michael Lucci, CEO of State Armor, a nonprofit focused on countering the CCP, told the DCNF. "Xi Jinping considers United Front work a critical tool to undermine democracies. It involves influence peddling, intelligence collection, and intellectual property theft, all for the end goal of aligning U.S. subnational governments with China’s foreign policy and exploiting weaknesses they find." NAHAUS’s website details one meeting in China between Yu and the Hangzhou ACFROC Communist Party secretary on Nov. 29, 2018. During the meeting, Yu said NAHAUS would "work tirelessly to support the construction of Hangzhou and continue to serve the function of uniting and leading overseas Chinese," according to a Chinese social media post that includes a photo of Yu alongside the ACFROC Party secretary. Yu is likewise listed as an "overseas committee member" by the Zhejiang ACFROC branch, and he also met with officials from that group in China in November 2018, according to NAHAUS’ website. In March 2023, Yu participated in a Zhejiang ACFROC overseas advisory committee webinar, according to Zhejiang ACFROC. During the webinar, Yu and other ACFROC officials discussed matters such as building overseas coalitions. ’TALENT RECRUITMENT’ Yu also agreed to headhunt U.S. talent for at least half a dozen Chinese regional governments, including the cities of Hangzhou and Guangzhou, according to Chinese government and ACFROC announcements. For instance, in November 2019, the CCP announced that Yu agreed to establish an "Overseas Talent Recruitment Work Station" in North America for the party’s Organization Department in Nanning, a city located in the Guangxi Autonomous Region. The Organization Department oversees China’s malign talent recruitment programs, like the Thousand Talents Plan, which incentivizes participants to "return to China to augment its scientific and military capabilities," according to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Yu has also agreed to help recruit U.S. talent to support China’s high-tech development, including in the field of artificial intelligence. Guangxi’s ACFROC branch recently announced that Yu had met with its officials on March 27, 2025. During that meeting, Yu promised to continue introducing "top-quality resources to Guangxi" after the ACFROC chairwoman told him the region’s artificial intelligence industry urgently required "overseas high-level talents." A November 2018 article by the Chinese media outlet Sohu reported Yu had previously headhunted for the Chengdu government’s High-Tech Zone and Tianfu Software Park, which are home to multiple Chinese military companies sanctioned by the U.S. Department of Defense, including Chengdu JOUAV Automation Tech Co., Chengdu M&S Electronics Technology Co., Tencent, and Huawei. ’UNLIMITED POWER’ Meanwhile, Yu has organized the Chinese American community in Massachusetts to canvas and raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to elect Democratic lawmakers like Wu. Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) records show Yu has personally donated $45,515 to various Massachusetts Democratic politicians since 2018, including $3,200 to Wu and $2,175 to Gov. Maura Healey. Among other leadership roles, Yu also serves as the co-chair of the New England Chinese American Alliance (NECAA), which has "actively engaged the Chinese community in political campaigns," according to the nonprofit’s website. Toward that end, NECAA has hosted "fundraising events" for at least nine Massachusetts politicians including Wu and Healey. NECAA’s website claims it "raised over $300,000 from the Chinese American community for Michelle Wu," and Yu’s Twitter advertised fundraising events for the future mayor in November 2020 and June 2021. "We organized so many fundraisers and translated campaign materials into Chinese for more Chinese residents to read," Yu said about his work for Wu, according to a November 2021 Boston University News Service (BUNS) report. "We did street canvassing every week. We had unlimited power for supporting her in the past year." By September 2021, NECAA had "expanded the fundraising scope from the Greater Boston area to more than 30 states across the country," BUNS reported. "Public officials need to thoroughly vet any organization and individual that has ties to China’s government, and interface with state and federal law enforcement when there is any uncertainty," Lucci told the DCNF. "It is well-known that China’s government seeks to influence U.S. politics and place agents within our governance systems to further the CCP’s agenda. We need to stop letting them get away with it." Yu also donated $3,000 to Massachusetts State Auditor Diana DiZoglio, OCPF records show. DiZoglio added Yu to her "policies and priorities" transition team after winning her race for state auditor in June 2021, and later appointed him to serve as a commissioner on the state’s Asian American and Pacific Islanders Commission (AAPIC) in January 2024. Yu now serves as vice chair of AAPIC, which describes itself as "the Commonwealth’s only permanent, statewide body dedicated to addressing the needs and challenges of the AAPI community." AAPIC’s chairman, Saatvik Ahluwalia, told the DCNF by email the organization was completely "unaware" of any activity between Yu and ACFROC. "[T]his is the first time we have heard of ACFROC, and we’ve had no contact, affiliation, or engagement with either the organization or the Chinese Government," Ahluwalia said. "We absolutely intend to investigate what you outlined in your questions, including talking directly to Mr. Yu." NECAA, Healey, and DiZoglio did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Related: Michelle Wu 03/26/2025 Massive ICE raid in Boston area resulted in nearly 400 illegals arrested, including more than 200 with ‘serious’ criminal convictions/charges. Michelle Wu 03/25/2025 Homan blasts blue state as report shows it releasing illegals charged with ‘horrific' crimes on low bails Michelle Wu 03/05/2025 Michelle Wu Gets the ''Find Out'' Treatment From Pam Bondi Ahead of Oversight Committee Hearing — RedState Related: United Front Work Department: 2024-12-22 Pitch at Palace dossier is found at £1million secret HQ of Prince Andrew 'spook' United Front Work Department: 2023-11-28 China's growing espionage and propaganda threat IN the U.S.: Congress warns America has little grasp at how deep the Communist Party's influence has infiltrated communities across the nation United Front Work Department: 2022-11-25 How China's Covert Operations Fooled the World |
Link |
Science & Technology |
AI chipmaker Nvidia to invest billions in US amid Trump onshoring push: CEO |
2025-03-21 |
[FoxBusinessNews] Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said Wednesday that the leading artificial intelligence chipmaker will invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. supply chain over the next four years. Huang made the announcement in an interview with the Financial Times. It follows moves by other technology companies, including Apple, which are unveiling multibillion-dollar investments in onshoring plans, as President Donald Trump's administration implements its "America First" policies, and following the Republican's Made in America campaign promise. "Overall, we will procure, over the course of the next four years, probably half a trillion dollars worth of electronics in total," Huang reportedly told the FT. "And I think we can easily see ourselves manufacturing several hundred billion of it here in the US." Huang said the increased U.S. production would be possible through suppliers such as the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and Foxconn. Huawei in China poses a growing competitive threat, Huang told the FT, adding that he was confident in the Trump administration's ability to form policy to speed up the AI industry in the U.S. Related: Nvidia 03/14/2025 Freed hostage says he saw Avinatan Or alive in captivity, marking first sign of life Nvidia 02/04/2025 Belgium swerves to the right as Bart De Wever sworn in as prime minister Nvidia 01/30/2025 End of an Era: China's DeepSeek Reveals Massive Problems for US IT Companies |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas | |
China Cuts the Cord: Beijing's Plan To Disconnect America and Its Allies | |
2025-02-02 | |
[FreeBeacon] America’s adversaries are finding new ways to break the internet. This weekend, Sweden detained a ship for allegedly destroying an underseas cable shortly after leaving Russia. Around Thanksgiving, a Chinese ship dragged its anchor across a hundred miles of the Baltic Sea, severing other seabed internet connections. And earlier this month, the Taiwanese Coast Guard ran down another Chinese-owned ship that sailed over one of the few cables connecting Taiwan to the rest of the world just before it snapped. Chinese apps like TikTok and DeepSeek dominate headlines, but the battle for control of the internet is not only taking place in cyberspace. Russia and China are breaking parts of the global internet, and they are revealing parts of their strategy for toppling the United States. Dominating the internet is a priority for China. In 2015, it launched the Digital Silk Road to make China a world leader in internet technology. Building undersea cables is an important part: When countries connect to the rest of the world through China, Beijing can spy on them more easily, steer them toward other Chinese-dominated technologies, and even police their internet activity. Chinese telecom giant Huawei built out 15 percent of the global internet before the Trump administration sanctioned it in 2019, and Chinese companies will install nearly half of the underwater internet cables planned for 2023-2028. American sanctions are much more effective than Chinese ones, so China uses other methods to damage the West's internet. Beijing blocks internet projects that run through the South China Sea despite The Hague dismissing its territorial claims there in 2016. And it is ramping up its sabotage campaign. Attacking NATO’s internet infrastructure is part of China’s overall strategy to weaken the United States. Beijing despises NATO and accuses it and the United States of adopting a "Cold War mentality." When Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin announced their "no limits" partnership shortly before Russia invaded Ukraine, they agreed to "oppose further enlargement of NATO" as well as "the formation of closed bloc structures and opposing camps in the Asia-Pacific region." After NATO observed that China was enabling Russia’s war effort, a Foreign Ministry spokesman told the alliance to "avoid messing up Asia the way it messed up Europe." Chinese and Russian ships are now destroying internet and energy infrastructure for Finland and Sweden, both of which joined NATO after Russia’s belligerence made their former neutrality untenable. At first glance, this is a strange maneuver. Most countries do not go out of their way to make enemies, as China is doing in Europe. NATO’s security commitments stop far from China’s borders too. Beijing nonetheless sees NATO as a threat because it views all American alliances that way. A diplomatically isolated United States seems weaker to Beijing, so it is trying to break up America’s alliances all around the globe. In this case, America’s adversaries are trying to show that Sweden’s and Finland’s decision to join NATO was foolish. Beijing is using a similar strategy closer to home. It is trying to convince Taiwan that resistance is futile and that accepting integration with the mainland is the smarter move. Cutting off the island’s internet connections, bombarding it with propaganda, and effectively blockading it with military drills and missile tests are all designed to make the island democracy surrender without needing an invasion. Losing Taiwan would be catastrophic for Americans. Most people are by now familiar with the significance of Taiwan's semiconductor manufacturing, which both Joe Biden and Donald Trump want to bring to the United States. But that industry is not nearly the most important reason for defending Taiwan. If China takes the island, it will have a base that dominates the shipping lanes Japan and South Korea rely on for food and fuel. How well could either country stand up to Beijing then? And if they buckle under, there is little chance for the United States to keep together a coalition that can prevent China from dominating Asia. The underwater cables that make the global internet work exemplify the larger strategic problem. When the internet spread around the world after the Cold War, the U.S. military dominated the "global commons," the air and waterways that most international trade traverses. There was little need then to think about securing these cables from sabotage or destruction. Those days are gone. So far, the damage from China's cable-cutting campaign has been minimal. Traffic has been redirected with relatively little fuss. But each cable becomes more important as fewer and fewer remain. And China’s threats will grow more persuasive the longer its aggression goes unpunished.
| |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas |
In 2024, the China-US trade war reached a new level |
2024-12-29 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Kirill Novikov [REGNUM] The outgoing year was marked by another round of US-Chinese tariff confrontation, and by the end of 2024 it reached a new level. ![]() On December 3, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce imposed a ban on the export of gallium, germanium, antimony, and several other superhard materials (it is not specified which ones) to the United States. And just a day later, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced sanctions against a number of American companies: Teledyne Brown Engineering Inc, BRINC Drones Inc, and Shield AI Inc. The sanctions were imposed after the Pentagon gave its prior consent to supply Taiwan with spare parts for F-16 fighters and radars. China views this as an attack on its own territorial integrity. As for materials prohibited for export, antimony is widely used in the defense industry. It is found in explosive caps used in firearms cartridges, grenade fuses, and artillery shells. In 2018, the U.S. Department of the Interior added antimony to the list of metals of critical importance to national security, but America has not mined it since 2001, when the Sunshine mine in Idaho closed. The largest suppliers of antimony are China and Russia, with the former accounting for 54.5% of global production in 2022. The US risks losing a resource that is fundamentally important for its defense industry. Gallium is actively used in the production of radio frequency chips for mobile and satellite communications, display LEDs, as well as in aviation and space technology. It is used to create microcircuits capable of supporting stable operation of 4th and 5th generation wireless networks (4G and 5G), which play a decisive role in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Germanium is needed for the defense industry, in particular for the production of night vision devices, as well as for the manufacture of solar panels. Both elements play a huge role in areas such as high-speed communications and renewable energy production, and there is nothing to replace them with today; there are no analogues. The main supplier of gallium and germanium is China. It produces 80% of gallium-containing products and accounts for 60 % of the world's germanium production. By imposing sanctions, China seeks to weaken the US position and deprive it of the resources necessary for the development of information technology and AI. The current situation is a new round of the tariff war between China and the United States, which began back in 2016, when Donald Trump first took the presidential seat in the White House. His rise to political prominence began with a sharp criticism of the trade deficit and deep interdependence of the Chinese and American economies, which led to a serious loss of jobs in America (2.7 million between 2001 and 2011). That is why Trump won broad support among workers in the 2016 election, promising to bring manufacturing back to America. But he also accused China of manipulating its own currency and stealing American technology, expressing concern about China's advances in high technology. From the US perspective, the authoritarian state's leadership in this area is an existential threat. It may seem paradoxical, but the Democratic Party of the United States, which is fundamentally hostile to Trump, has continued his line of economic struggle with China. Although Joe Biden has avoided criticizing China purely rhetorically, and even before the elections, he accused Republicans of speculating on the Chinese issue (in response, Trump has repeatedly stated that he was “bribed” by China), however, already as US President, he has in fact renounced these words. Yes, his administration has emphasized that the confrontation between the countries is “competition,” not “rivalry” (a position that Secretary of State Antony Blinken defended in his article ), but even in the latest US National Security Strategy (October 2022), it is China that is designated as the “main competitor” capable of revising the world order. Trump's tariff policy was continued by Biden without any significant changes, most of the previous duties were retained, and some were even increased. The Democratic administration has focused on fighting China in the high-tech sector. For example, in 2023, the sale of Huawei equipment and technology was banned in America, and in April of this year, the US threatened to ban the TikTok social network if it was not sold to the US within nine months — the “Protecting Americans from Apps Controlled by Foreign Adversaries Act.” The title of the document speaks for itself. In early December 2024, America imposed sanctions on 140 Chinese chip companies (which triggered the Chinese restrictions mentioned at the beginning), including Naura Technology Group, AMC Research, Skyverse Technology, Empyrean Technology. At the same time, the US imposed export controls on high-bandwidth memory chips, which are important components for AI applications. The Democratic Party's interest in high technology is due to the fact that it receives significant support from information and telecommunications companies. The history of tariff wars between China and the United States clearly shows that neoliberal globalization is currently experiencing its own crisis. This has affected even its most consistent apologists, the US Democratic Party, which rhetorically defends the old values of free trade, but in fact moves away from them, adopting elements of the policies of its main opponent. Of course, the economic interdependence between China and the United States cannot be broken overnight without damage to both sides, but the opponents do not intend to retreat and are still set on further escalation of the tariff war. They are not ready to give up the benefits acquired in the conditions of globalization, but they put their own national interests first. The outgoing year demonstrated this with complete clarity, and 2025 will certainly provide many more clear confirmations of this conclusion. |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Sanctions That Raised a Dragon: How China Is Taking Over Global Markets |
2024-11-11 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Ivan Lizan [REGNUM] We learn about many Western monopolies that have formed and become so commonplace that they are no longer noticeable only when they collapse. We will certainly learn more in the near future, thanks to Chinese companies that are quietly but systematically capturing world markets. ![]() But it is worth starting with the already formed Chinese monopoly. We are talking about the extraction of rare (RM) and rare earth metals (REM). RM includes 17 minerals, the rare group includes another 60 elements, including lithium and cobalt. The peculiarity of rare earth metals is not so much their small reserves, but their low concentration in the earth's crust, uneven occurrence across countries, and their tendency to form strong compounds with other metals and minerals. As a result, to extract rare earth metals, it is necessary to shovel thousands of tons of rock, spending a lot of energy and chemicals to extract them as pure metals and other compounds. Therefore, the extraction of rare earth metals turns into big problems for the environment, and the club of producing countries has never been large. In 1986, the United States was the leading producer of rare earths, more than twice as much as the USSR, and China was in third place. With the collapse of the USSR, the Soviet rare earth industry also disappeared. At the same time, China, with the support of the government, began to actively increase the volume of REE production: it was becoming increasingly difficult for American miners to compete with cheap Chinese rare earths, and increased pressure from environmentalists finally finished off the Mountain Pass mine. Thus, by the mid-2000s, the global rare earth market was under the control of China, accounting for over half of production. Until 2023, China's monopoly in the REE sphere was a burden for governments of other countries only when they tried to get rid of it - export control allowed the Chinese government not only to control the price of REEs, but also, if necessary, to bankrupt Chinese competitors by dumping on the market. However, in 2023, China began to impose export restrictions. First, the American military-industrial complex giant, Lockheed Martin, and its subsidiary Raytheon, responsible for missile production, fell under sanctions. Then Beijing introduced licensing for the export of germanium and gallium under the pretext of protecting national security. And this became a huge problem for the American military-industrial complex: it is cut off from part of the REE, and its total consumption of these minerals does not allow for profitable extraction of the necessary minerals in the United States under market conditions. At the same time, other companies continue to receive supplies from China and do not need expensive rare earth metals from Mountain Pass. STEEL Already in 2024, it was not only gallium and germanium from China that became a problem. Chinese steel became a headache for many countries. China smelts 1 billion tons a year, more than the rest of the world combined. For comparison: Russia smelts 75-77 million tons a year, Ukraine before the start of the SVO - 20-22 million. For decades, steel remained in China, where it was consumed by construction sites. The Chinese government was aware of the dependence of its own metallurgy on the construction industry, as well as the negative impact of metallurgy on the already problematic ecology, so it periodically introduced bans on the construction of new metallurgical plants. Naturally, the plants tried to export surplus metal. From 2025 onwards, China's steel demand is expected to decline by 1% per year, equivalent to 10 million tonnes. The "excess" metal has already found its way onto the world market: in the first six months of 2024, China's steel exports grew by 24%, reaching 53.4 million tonnes. The country now exports around 100 million tonnes of steel per year. Russia is not affected by the influx of Chinese steel: its import in 2024 is at the level of last year. In addition, Russian metallurgists have a general agreement to refuse to supply metal to suppliers of cheap imports. But for the European Union, this is a problem: in August, the European Commission began anti-dumping investigations into the import of hot-rolled sheet metal from Egypt, India, Japan and Vietnam, through which Chinese metallurgical plants can bypass European restrictions. If in 2023 there were three anti-dumping investigations against metal from China worldwide, then by the beginning of July 2024 their number increased to ten. At the same time, the already mentioned Ukraine is not able to compete on the European market with Russian steel, and even less with Chinese steel. RENEWABLE ENERGY China has achieved no less resounding successes in mechanical engineering. IA Regnum has already written about the reasons for the popularity of Chinese cars. But China also has something to brag about in power engineering, and in its most fashionable part - "green" energy. In August 2024, Norwegian consultancy Rystad Energy reported that China's installed solar and wind power capacity exceeded that of coal-fired power plants for the first time. From 2020 to 2023, China commissioned 100 GW of renewable energy, and in 2023, 293 GW of new "green" capacity was commissioned. The presence of its own RM and REE, together with the focus on the development of renewable energy, has allowed Beijing to make a giant technological breakthrough in solar and wind energy. The already low cost of producing photovoltaic cells in China has decreased by 42% this year. Now the specific cost of solar modules in China is 15 cents per 1 watt, which is significantly lower than the production figures for India (22 cents), Europe (30 cents) and the USA (40 cents). Therefore, it is not surprising that China controls 80% of the world market. And it is not a matter of dumping or subsidies - it is the effect of scale and a powerful raw material base. A similar story is with wind turbines. By the end of 2023, China took first place in the world in registering patents in wind energy. As in the case of solar power plants, the effect of scale, domestic reserves of rare earth metals and cheap steel are at play. In 2023, of the 116 GW of new wind power capacity globally, projects in China accounted for 65%, with most of the generators being manufactured locally. China now also accounts for 40% of the world’s total installed wind capacity, making it the world’s largest market, surpassing the US and Europe. As a result, Chinese wind farms are three times cheaper per MW than those in the US and EU, so they are barred by prohibitive tariffs. COMPUTER HARDWARE AND TECHNOLOGY In the field of high technology, China's leadership has long been undisputed, and it is no longer fought so much by high R&D spending as by sanctions. A striking example of their inefficiency is the Huawei corporation, against which the United States first introduced restrictions back in 2019. Following six years of being under American sanctions, Huawei managed, firstly, to triumphantly return to the Chinese smartphone market, causing a drop in Apple sales; secondly, to bring its Ascend 910B AI chips to the market, forcing the American Nvidia to sell its products on the Chinese market at a discount of 10-15%; thirdly, to take and hold first place in the Chinese cloud computing market for seven years in a row; fourthly, to ensure global leadership in the wearable electronics market. All this allowed the corporation to earn record profits — with a growth of 34.3% — in the first half of 2024 in the amount of $7.7 billion. In addition, Huawei released the world's first smartphone that folds in three in September. But Huawei's breakthroughs are not the end of Western problems: Chinese companies have put down roots in the production of semiconductors and other components for electronics. The creation of YMTC in 2016 resulted in a collapse in prices for SSD drives by 2022 - China not only learned to produce next-generation memory, but also began to produce it in gigantic volumes, changing the alignment of the global market. At the same time, the company's inclusion on the US sanctions list could not stop YMTC: last year, it mastered the mass production of 232-layer memory chips with a record storage capacity. The situation on the global display market is no better for Chinese competitors. For many years, South Korea dominated the LCD and OLED display market — OLED screens were a competitive advantage for smartphones from Samsung. But then the star of China's BOE Technology Group began to rise. First, it captured the LCD panel market, bringing its market share to 26.5% by the end of 2023, and now it is storming the global OLED market. The Chinese company currently controls 12% of the global market, but BOE is building new factories and actively investing in development. Meanwhile, the United States is discussing the need to include it in the sanctions list — under the pretext, of course, of protecting national security. VIDEO GAMES Chinese companies have also reached an area where the West's position previously seemed unshakable. In the summer of 2024, the Chinese studio Game Science released the computer action game Black Myth: Wukong, which immediately set several records in the global video game industry. Sales of the game on the Steam platform exceeded 21 million copies, bringing Game Science $1 billion with development costs of about $70 million. The game also broke the record for the number of simultaneous players - 2.1 million people played it. Black Myth: WuKong had every chance to become the game of the year in the prestigious Golden Joystick Awards 2024 rating, but it did not work out for various reasons, including those far from fair voting. Apparently, Chinese successes are very stressful for American studios. In particular, the publisher of the legendary Call of Duty series of games, Activision-Blizzard, for which Microsoft recently paid 70 billion dollars. After all, if sanctions can still be imposed on Game Science, then standing behind every gamer and making sure that they do not launch Chinese games will definitely not work. And in general, sanctions are sanctions, but, as practice shows, it has not yet been possible to stop China. Related: Rare earth 09/20/2024 What China's New African Strategy Will Mean for Russia and the US Rare earth 09/06/2024 It's a world war now. EU and US have decided to go for broke Rare earth 08/26/2024 Preparing US Special Operations Forces for Global Conflict |
Link |
Cyber |
The Linux Case: Why a Finn Millionaire Kicked Out Russian Developers |
2024-11-01 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Ivan Lizan [REGNUM] At the end of October, Russian developers were banned from developing the Linux operating system kernel. Now Russians are cut off from developing the OS, which occupies 5% of the desktop market, 30% of the server market, and is used in a host of other devices - from routers to smartphones and portable gaming consoles. ![]() The news shook the information space, as it became not only a striking example of discrimination based on nationality, but also a precedent when sanctions affect open source software, which until now was considered immune to politically motivated restrictions. Globally, software is divided into two parts depending on the availability of its source code: closed and open. Closed, or proprietary, software is subject to restrictions on the use, copying, and modification of the source code. A clear example is the Windows OS: you cannot distribute it as you wish, you do not have access to its source code, and you do not have the right to modify it. Such software is the property of the developer, who sets the rules for use. Open source software can be freely used and modified. It appeared as a counterweight to proprietary software in the mid-1980s thanks to the American Richard Stallman, who united around himself in the NGO Free Software Foundation developers guided by the idea of creating free software, for the use of which you do not need to pay. Regardless of the goals that open source developers are guided by, they still enter into legal relations with each other, automatically accepting the terms of the license. Those, in turn, come in several types. Reciprocal - oblige the developer to distribute the modified program under the same conditions as the original. Such licenses include all types of GPL (General Public License), LGPL and AGPL. Permissive — allow the creation of proprietary software based on the original program, but do not allow the author of the original code to control the fate of the modified version of the software. Permissive licenses include BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution License), MIT, and Apache. Thus, open source software, in turn, is divided into two more types depending on the order: license - its use for free (distributed under mutual licenses) and Open Source (distributed under permissive licenses). In the case of Linux and Russia, the GPL license is important. Now we need to figure out how Open Source developers interact with each other — the movement. At the core is a repository — a cloud storage with project files containing the source code, which are usually GitLab or Launchpad portals. Contributors, i.e. participants in the Open Source movement, work with these files. They copy the repository for themselves, creating a fork (clone), and make their own changes to it that do not affect the main repository. The edits made to the fork are called commits. After that, contributors submit a pull request to the repository administrators — a request to merge their copy of the repository with its original. If the administration approves the request, the original repository is updated. In the case of Linux, a large operating system with many variants, worked on by hundreds of different teams, there is an internal division of developers. Over the years, the most competent and responsible members of the community have been promoted to maintainers, allowing them to work with the operating system kernel. And at the head of the entire movement are three people: Linus Torvalds, Greg Kroah-Hartman and Huah Han. And here, at the intersection of law and the internal hierarchy of Open Source developers, the inevitable bureaucracy arises in the form of the non-profit consortium The Linux Foundation. LINUX FOUNDATION VS. RUSSIA The consortium does not develop the operating system or its components, but promotes their development by coordinating and protecting community members, including providing them with legal services. The organization itself unites 130 corporations and thousands of individual members. Naturally, The Linux Foundation is a legal entity. Thus, jurisprudence and corporate bureaucracy come into conflict with the interests of the Open Source community. In 2022, US President Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14,071, which prohibited Russians from developing or using GPL-licensed software created in the US. Formally, the order does not apply to all Russian citizens, but only to those who are either on the sanctions lists or work for companies included in the US Treasury's sanctions lists. However, the order only came into force on September 12, 2024 - companies had 90 days to comply with it. The Linux Foundation did the only possible thing, taking into account the letter of Decree No. 14 071, by excluding from its ranks developers who were important to the entire community and who suffered because of their Russian citizenship and mailboxes in the RU domain zone. No one explained anything, no one was warned about anything. Moreover, when a storm of indignation arose in the community, the Finn Linus Torvalds, whose father was a communist until 2014 and then became a nationalist, accompanied the removal of Russians with a specifically Russophobic comment. "Okay, a bunch of Russian trolls are on their way out. It's pretty obvious why this change was made and it won't be reversed," Torvalds wrote, identifying 11 highly respected community members as trolls. In essence, the consortium's management and the founding father of Linux, Linus Torvalds himself, did not have a choice between conflict with the US and preserving the principles of Open Source. But instead of a civilized farewell, Torvalds and company simply kicked out the Russians, who, out of pure enthusiasm, spent thousands of hours of their time creating the program on which dollar millionaire Torvalds is now promoting himself. THE RUSSIANS ARE ALREADY HERE, THE CHINESE ARE NEXT Overall, this story suggests several local and global conclusions. Firstly, the United States has once again extended its national legislation to those areas that were previously not subject to any legal regulation, and in principle did not need such regulation. Secondly, any formalized international projects managed by a legal entity or coordinated through an NPO are vulnerable to sanctions. Russia was expelled from hundreds of different organizations and associations after 2022, from medical associations to the Large Hadron Collider. If they could have been expelled from ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) without the collapse of the Internet — they definitely would have. And the bureaucracy that imposes sanctions is indifferent to internal rules, goals, principles and hierarchy. Its interest is in inflicting maximum harm on the party that they designate as guilty. At first, The Linux Foundation will suffer from this story only in terms of reputation - they will find someone to replace the 11 Russian maintainers. But now the Russians have been excluded, and tomorrow the Chinese will take their place. And then it will turn out that the development of various Linux forks is being carried out without exchanging changes and technologies due to sanctions and the stupidity of the main maintainers. And after some time, instead of one Linux Foundation, a couple more will appear - the number of forks will multiply, the differences between them will increase. Moreover, such an example already exists. In 2019, the US banned Huawei from using Google services (GMS). At the time, it seemed like a fatal blow, but instead of dying, Huawei made its own services (HMS), including an app store. As a result, Huawei's Android fork, which differed from the original version only in its shell, evolved over five years into a separate operating system that has nothing in common with Android. Now it's time to move on to the global trends that Linux fits into. DEGLOBALIZATION IS PAINFUL AND EXPENSIVE Due to the inertia of human thinking, the current round (it is neither the first nor the last) of deglobalization is perceived as a tragedy, especially when it comes to the digital sphere, which for decades was considered a space of freedom. In reality, there was no such freedom, there were simply no reasons to tighten the screws. But after 2014, they appeared. First, it turned out that Russia needed to be forced into submission, and then China, which had set its sights on competing with the US in the high-tech sector. At that point, software and various digital services turned into weapons. And since IT is entirely based on American technologies, the US began to openly abuse sanctions. At first, the stated goal was to cause damage to bring it into submission. With ZTE, which came under attack from Washington due to the supply of telecommunications equipment to Iran, it worked: the corporation paid a fine and replaced part of the board of directors. As a result, ZTE's position was greatly weakened. But with Huawei, it didn’t work out: the initial blows, the deprivation of access to GMS and the ban on chip production in Taiwan were spread out over time, which allowed them to adapt and survive. At the same time, from 2019 to 2022, American companies sold chips to Huawei under general licenses. In 2022, Washington changed its approach and immediately began to strike hard. But this did not help either. Having banned the sale of electronic design automation equipment to China in 2022, the United States faced the fact that China imported them — with the help of the same Huawei. The ban on the supply of lithographs, including to the world leader, the Dutch ASML, led first to a sharp increase in orders from China, and then to the strongest collapse of the company's shares in 26 years, dragging down the shares of other Asian high-tech brands. At the same time, China is working on import substitution of lithographs. The beauty of globalization was the maximum possible division of labor, which allowed the development of technology and technology with minimal costs and the highest possible pace. If the development of the 16-nm process technology cost Taiwan's TSMC $1.1 billion, then for 3-nm they will spend $4-5 billion only on development and $15-20 billion on the construction of a new plant. Deglobalization will lead to a slowdown in the pace of progress and an increase in costs in already extremely expensive sectors of the economy. With "software" the story is different. There is no need to build factories for it, but it is easier to ban it. However, it is possible to bypass bans, including through complete substitution - if there is a desire. And it will definitely appear, considering the Linux case and the behavior of Washington clerks together with Finnish millionaire-Russophobes. |
Link |
Britain |
Chinese Electric Vehicles Could Be 'Weaponised' by Beijing, Report Warns |
2024-09-19 |
Imagine the EV 'BOOM' [Breitbart] The British government’s open-doors approach to electric vehicles from Communist China threatens to undercut domestic manufacturing and expose the country to national security risks, with a think tank warning that EVs could be “weaponised” by Beijing. A report from the China Strategic Risks Institute (CSRI) warned that the growing market share of and dependency on Chinese-made electric vehicles in Britain presents both “economic and security risks” to the United Kingdom. The report noted that the UK’s domestic car industry is responsible for 198,000 manufacturing jobs, representing 2.5 per cent of the country’s entire GDP. However, given Communist China’s subsidization of its burgeoning EV sector, producing an excess of five to ten million cheaply-produced cars per year, the failure by Westminster to impose import restrictions will threaten the future of British car manufacturing. This process has already begun to have major impacts, with the CSRI claiming that Chinese-made EVs have increased their UK market share from just 2 per cent in 2019 to 33.4 per cent in the first half of 2023. The think tank warned that London’s refusal to levy tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, as opposed to the neighbouring European Union, could result in Britain becoming a “dumping ground and a potential backdoor into the European market” for Beijing. This could represent a point of friction between the UK and its allies in Europe as well as in the United States, potentially threatening trade with its closest partners, the CSRI said. Yet, the threats posed by flooding the UK with cars made in China are not merely contained to the economic realm, with the CSRI warning that components within the foreign EVs could be “weaponised” by the communist nation. According to the CSRI, Chinese-manufactured Cellular Internet of Things Modules (CIMs) used in EVs could be used to send data back the Beijing about British users. The paper noted that the totalitarian government mandates that all firms within the country provide data access to the state, which was one of the motivating factors for the UK’s previous decision to phase out Huawei components from its 5G networks by 2027. Perhaps more concerningly, however, the think tank warned that the modules within Chinese-made EVs could even allow adversarial forces to remotely shut down or even control the cars in Britain, posing a direct threat to national security. The CSRI suggested that the UK mandate foreign suppliers of EVs agree to not transmit data overseas under any circumstances, introduce a legal requirement to share their source code with the British government, and allow for regular inspections of data storage centres globally to ensure that sensitive data is not being sent covertly to other servers. Additionally, the think tank said that to protect domestic car manufacturers, the British government should launch an anti-state subsidies investigation into the Chinese EV market while also considering providing subsidies to British manufacturers or direct subsidies to consumers to promote local industry. Senior policy director at the CSRI, Sam Goodman said per The Telegraph: “The Government and the public appear to be unaware when it comes to the dependency, disruption, and data security risks the CIMs within Chinese EVs present to the UK. “We have heard little from the new Government on the risks Chinese EVs present so far. We urge that this be addressed, otherwise, the UK risks alienating its closest allies, deepening its dependency on China for its EV supply chain and the green transition, and leaving itself exposed to being bullied and blackmailed by Beijing.” Related: Britain: 2024-09-18 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: September 17, 2024 Britain: 2024-09-18 'The Old Rotten Cart.' How Poland Was Defeated in Two Weeks Britain: 2024-09-17 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: September 16, 2024 Related: Electric vehicles 09/16/2024 In Bid For Global Dominance, Beijing Builds EV Factories In Africa Electric vehicles 08/28/2024 Canada to impose 100% tariff on China electric vehicle imports Electric vehicles 07/31/2024 Kamala Harris' $5 billion green bus failure shows she can't even handle the small stuff Related: Internet of Things 07/16/2023 You should know about Shodan... Internet of Things 07/28/2022 Senate Passes Bill to Subsidize Microchips and Build Chip Plants Internet of Things 08/07/2021 Israeli cyber company detects severe Amazon security breach |
Link |
Government Corruption |
'Cleaning Up the Crypto Market.' Why the US Is Up in arms about Pavel Durov |
2024-08-30 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Ivan Lizan [REGNUM] Telegram founder Pavel Durov was accused in France of failing to counteract the distribution of criminal content via the messenger. He was placed under judicial supervision and ordered to post bail of 5 million euros. In addition, Durov was banned from leaving France and required to report to the police twice a week. ![]() In general, the 12 articles of the criminal code, incriminated to Pavel Durov by the French prosecutor's office, are as severe as they are absurd. Similar charges can be brought against Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk or Sergey Brin and Larry Page together. It is obvious that in a normal – competitive, fair and impartial – trial the charges against Durov will fall apart. But in this case Paris is acting together with Brussels and Washington, and Durov should not hope for justice. And it is even more obvious to everyone that the matter is clearly not in the lack of desire of the Telegram founder to satisfy the requests of French law enforcement. In addition to the official reason for Durov's detention, which boils down to maliciously ignoring Telegram requests from law enforcement agencies, there is a whole bunch of complementary unofficial ones. All of them look no less plausible. Firstly, the US desire to destroy the Toncoin (TON) cryptocurrency, which Durov launched against the will of Washington. Secondly, Brussels’ desire to force Telegram to create a pre-moderation system, that is, censoring content in accordance with the wishes of European bureaucrats. Thirdly, but this reason is almost impossible to prove, there was probably a motive to gain access to encryption keys for secret correspondence in the messenger for the purpose of using them in domestic political struggle or espionage. Due to Pavel Durov's diverse interests, these reasons should be considered together: they certainly do not contradict each other. Moreover, while French President Emmanuel Macron may indeed be concerned about the fight against crime and, say, the desire to spy on his allies and opponents, Brussels is much more concerned with censorship than maintaining law and order. And the United States has been paying close attention to cryptocurrencies for several years now in order to prevent the erosion of the global financial system. In general, Durov was “caught” under a combination of articles, and they charged him with whatever they could. MALICIOUS DISREGARD Durov's philosophy is based on libertarianism: he does not feel any reverence for the state in principle. He criticized the Russian past back at the turn of the 2000s and 2010s, and in 2014, if we are to believe Durov, he was asked to provide personal data of the organizers of the Euromaidan groups. Pavel refused, not “wanting to betray millions of Ukrainian users,” and suffered three times: in 2014, he lost control over the social network, in 2017, Petro Poroshenko blocked VKontakte in Ukraine, and from 2018 to 2020, Roskomnadzor blocked Telegram. In 2017, French intelligence services, together with UAE intelligence (Durov holds passports from these countries), hacked Pavel's iPhone to gain access to the correspondence of ISIS terrorists (a terrorist organization banned in Russia). The countries took this step, as The Wall Street Journal writes, because the messenger administration maliciously ignored requests from law enforcement agencies. In 2023, Brazil’s Supreme Court ordered Telegram blocked for refusing to provide data on the administrators of neo-Nazi groups accused of attacking a school in Aracruz. And after Pavel’s arrest, South Korean President Yoon Seok-yeol called for a thorough investigation into digital sex crimes after media reported that Telegram chats were frequently filled with erotic fake images and videos featuring South Korean women. In general, Durov ignored law enforcement agencies for a long time and systematically. He cooperated only in rare cases, for which he was blocked in China, Iran, India and Brazil, as well as Spain (for three days). The authorities of France (in 2023), the Netherlands and Germany complained about the messenger. Therefore, no matter how strange it may seem, Durov could have been detained for simply ignoring requests - sooner or later, law enforcement officials would have run out of patience. But this is only true in the case of France, since there are indeed plenty of oddities in the case. UNCOORDINATED CRYPTO PROJECTS Durov is also annoying Washington, but he has his own reasons, which may not be connected with ignoring requests and refusing to introduce censorship. The Durov brothers, Pavel and Nikolai, initially developed Telegram as a messenger, but messengers are extremely difficult to monetize. The subscription model is not suitable because it scares the audience, selling additional features is ineffective, and advertising in Telegram only appeared in the fall of 2021 - 8 years after its launch. But advertising for the Durov brothers was nothing more than a "crutch". In early 2018, Telegram announced plans to launch the TON blockchain platform. To do this, Telegram Group Inc. and its subsidiary TON Issuer sold 2.9 billion tokens and raised $1.7 billion. The project was initially scheduled to launch in October 2019, but the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a temporary injunction. It considered Telegram's actions to violate US securities laws. In the end, Durov promised to return 72% of the attracted money immediately, and promised to give 110% of the invested funds to those who were patient by April 30. Investors, mainly from Russia, agreed to Durov's terms and were satisfied. The brothers found the money, the financial issue was settled. For the time being, the cryptocurrency project was put aside. But the idea of "marrying" the messenger's nearly billion-strong audience with cryptocurrency was too attractive to refuse. And in September 2023, Durov presented the TON blockchain, in particular the Toncoin cryptocurrency, which, according to him, was planned to be used on a regular basis by businesses and developers in Telegram. The cryptocurrency was created by an open community of developers. As a result, the Durovs gave birth to a monster. TON is not just a cryptocurrency, but also a set of services: proxy servers and a domain name system, a marketplace, a commission-free blockchain-based payment system, decentralized data storage, and applications for working with the service. Even after Durov's arrest, TON did not fall out of the top 10 global cryptocurrencies, although it lost a little more than 20% of its value: shortly before the arrest, the coin was worth $6.8, and by the morning of August 29, it was worth $5.3. ARREST BY OTHER PEOPLE'S HANDS Against this background, a reasonable question arises: why is Washington angry with Durov? Firstly, TON is built on the same libertarian philosophy as Telegram. It is inconvenient for the US and is not controlled by Washington. Pavel Durov reported this back in 2020, stating the world's dependence on the US in matters of finance and technology. There has long been a legend in the world of cryptocurrency enthusiasts that Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, whose identity is unknown, is in fact nothing more than a cover for the CIA or another American structure that invented cryptocurrency. There is no direct confirmation of this, but in the Western press there are quotes from CIA Director William Burns that he inherited from his predecessors "a number of projects focused on cryptocurrency." Regardless of whether the CIA invented the “bitcoin” or not, American intelligence agencies would certainly do everything possible and impossible to control any cryptocurrency, at least to understand who pays for what and when. Secondly, cryptocurrencies - especially after Russia was disconnected from the global financial system with the blocking of banks and the ability to use freely convertible currencies - have become a widely used means of payment for settlements with unfriendly jurisdictions. And recently, they have also been legalized. And while Washington is fighting banks quite successfully (especially after Biden's decree of December 22, 2023), things are not so clear with cryptocurrencies. The largest crypto exchange Binance left Russia under duress in September 2023 — this is how the US fought against circumventing sanctions through cryptocurrencies. But at the same time, and often unnoticed by the media, the US fought against cryptocurrency projects launched by Russians. Cryptocurrency consultant Mikhail Zhukhovitsky counted six cases when the US directly or indirectly — through France and the UAE — destroyed Russian cryptocurrency projects, some of those arrested were extradited to the US. For example, the only developer of the Tornado Cash project who remained at large survived only because he was in Russia. And in the Bitzlato project, even coders and marketers were imprisoned, and they have been awaiting trial in pretrial detention for two years. On August 25, Zhukhovitsky wrote that Pavel's arrest was the beginning of the destruction of his team, and on August 28, Politico reported that Nikolai Durov had been placed on the wanted list and was accused of refusing to cooperate with the Paris prosecutor's office for combating cybercrime in a case of forcing a minor to distribute "self-produced pornography." Zhukhovitsky claims that the indictment for such cases is always prepared in the United States, and the arrests and detentions are carried out by others. ONE AGAINST ALL To put it simply, Durov's fate is unenviable: Paris, Brussels and Washington are against him. And the conclusions that come to mind from this story are extremely simple. Pavel Durov was let down by his own commitment to libertarianism, along with his belief that he could be above the clash of great powers. One can maneuver between centers of power only for a certain period of time. Sooner or later one would have to make a decision, choosing a side that would allow one to preserve most of one's convictions, in order to live by the principle of "bend, but don't bend." The side is the "roof" in the person of the state. When Canada detained Meng Wanzhou, Huawei's CFO and daughter of Huawei President Ren Zhengfei, at the request of the United States in 2018, the Chinese government stepped in and secured her release. Russia stood up for Bout, Yaroshenko, and Krasikov and also secured their release. Durov ignored the "rules of the game" and did not want to choose a "roof". Now there is no one to stand up for him - and this is his personal tragedy. Related: Pavel Durov 08/29/2024 Paris court releases Durov under supervision with bail of 5 million euros, faces 10 year sentence Pavel Durov 08/29/2024 South Korea faces deepfake porn 'emergency' Pavel Durov 08/28/2024 Note on Durov from the channel 'Especially for RT'. |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Chinese Military Companies Spent $24 Million Lobbying U.S. |
2024-04-17 |
The list of names includes companies the U.S. government has identified as major security threats, including telecom titan Huawei and Megvii, a facial recognition firm that helped Huawei design a system that could spot members of China’s oppressed Uyghur minority in a crowd. “Chinese military corporations cast a wide net across the American government, lobbying the House, Senate and various parts of the executive branch, including the office of the president, often setting their sights on proposed policies that would impact their U.S. operations,” the report from the Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) found. The definition of a “Chinese military company” was established by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), which maintains a list of entities that are either owned by various arms of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China, or are involved in “military-civil fusions.” Huawei was the biggest spender on Washington lobbyists, with over $10.8 million in outlays since 2020. This is unsurprising not only because of Huawei’s vast size, with nearly $100 billion in annual revenue, but because Huawei has been battling against U.S. legislation that would sharply limit the sale of its products. As DCNF noted, Huawei won quite a few of those battles after paying big money for the services of high-powered, heavily-connected lobbying firms like the Podesta Group. Huawei has a subsidiary called Futurewei that also reportedly spent millions on lobbyists, and also saw the defeat of legislation that would have harmed its interests. |
Link |