Submit your comments on this article | |
-Land of the Free | |
Which way for the Marine Corps? | |
2025-07-08 | |
Which conflicting vision best represents the future of the Marine Corps? One Korea era Marine, Thomas Sowell has written about conflicting visions. … How can the Marine Corps best serve the Nation? How can the Marine Corps be best prepared for whatever challenge the future may bring? The answer maybe to focus first, last, and always, not on any narrow, defensive mission, but on a broad, global, crisis response mission. When Marines onboard Navy amphibious ships arrive off a nation in crisis, enemies are deterred, and friends are encouraged. A restored and enhanced Marine MAGTF can complete a variety of missions, not only missile and drone strikes, sitting, and sensing and passing on data, but also a variety of other missions including fight, strike, deter, evacuate, rescue, restore order, and more. A renewed focus on worldwide crisis response is both the best way for the Marine Corps to serve the Nation, and is the best way for the Marine Corps to unify its conflicting visions and arrive at tomorrow’s battlefield stronger than today. | |
Posted by:NoMoreBS |
#1 This part of the Transformation For Transformation's Sake struggle. The US Air Force and US Navy are focused on blowing up things accordingly they favor the concept that everything is a weapons system or its targeting sensors. The US Army, and usually the US Marine Corps, view that warfare is a "People Thing", Fourth Generation Warfare, and the whole purpose of the weapon systems is to empower the soldier with a bayonet-equipped rifle taking ground and more importantly forcing the enemy to do what we want. It may be Clausewitzian of me but I feel that making the rubble bounce is not enough. |
Posted by: magpie 2025-07-08 08:46 |