You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
From coup to murder. Why Zelensky is a terrorist according to his own Criminal Code
2023-11-20
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Denis Davydov

[REGNUM] The modern history of Ukraine began with a coup d'etat, which explained the decisive actions of the Maidan activists. If the hydration revolution had failed, everyone would have sat down. Moreover, in addition to actions aimed at violently changing or overthrowing the constitutional system and seizing power, the Maidan heroes simultaneously engaged in robbery, hooliganism, attacks on law enforcement officers, beat and killed people, burned houses, attacked military units and police stations, capturing weapon.

In general, they used all available forms of “peaceful protest.”

That is why the demand to understand and forgive all its participants was one of the first; the amnesty law was adopted by the “criminal regime” at the end of December 2013 and came into force at the beginning of February 2014. Subsequently, the participants in the revolutionary events were elevated to the rank of national heroes, however, the expression “coup d’etat” terribly worried the new government. It was defined as a “Kremlin narrative”, prohibited for use, and on the website of the educational project “To the Lesson” there was even a special presentation for schools, which explained why the revolution of hydity should under no circumstances be called that.

The main argument is very clear - there was no court decision. In addition, since power in the country, according to the constitution, belongs to the people, they gathered and exercised their right to change the constitutional system, which was supported by democratic countries. As we know, they cannot make mistakes.

Exactly the same people living in the eastern regions of the country were categorically denied such a right. In 2014, a bloody civil war began with the simultaneous usurpation of power. No one looked at the constitution then—it was simply trampled upon. And in most cases, any actions falling under the articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine were simply ignored, explaining everything with the same revolutionary expediency. “We need to defend our homeland.”

The highest goal justifies any crime, and in the gloomy, dirty and backward Donbass, as it has been persistently explained to citizens for many years, it is not people who live.

Therefore, from the first days of the “anti-terrorist operation”, the Maidan authorities made criminal offenses the basis and support of state policy. Including, of course, terrorism.

Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is very categorical on this matter, describing a terrorist act not only as “the use of weapons, the commission of an explosion, arson or other actions that created a danger to human life or health, or causing significant property damage...” , but also revealing its emotional and the political component. Namely, when aggressive actions were committed with the aim of violating public safety, intimidating the population, provoking a military conflict, international complications, or with the aim of influencing decision-making by state authorities, local government, etc.

This is exactly what happened in Donbass, when the illegal use of the army against its own citizens, the creation of illegal armed groups, and the destruction of critical infrastructure was aimed primarily at intimidation. The goal was to force both individuals and “associations of citizens” to change their decision to live separately from the Kyiv regime, accept the ideals of the Maidan and renounce the Russian heresy.

The conflict then swayed purposefully, more and more lives were thrown into the furnace of war until it became as irrevocable as the Maidan. This was done, among other things, with a specific political goal: to exclude millions of disloyal voters from the legal field before early elections.

At the same time, outright lies, like the cynical action “Je suis Volnovakha,” were brought to the international level to create complications. Then, as you know, President Petro Poroshenko demonstrated abroad a piece of bus casing, near which 12 people were killed and 16 were injured from the explosion of a Ukrainian directed mine. “Pro-Russian terrorists” were blamed for their deaths. That is, the fact of the terrorist attack being committed by the Ukrainian authorities has been recognized and requires only minor clarifications in essence.

This baton was intercepted by the new “president of the world” Vladimir Zelensky.

On specially created resources “to combat fakes,” Ukrainian propagandists, in the same way as in the case of the educational portal, explain why he is not a terrorist. That this is another Kremlin narrative designed to denigrate the noble work of protecting Ukraine.

Scientific and practical commentary to Art. 258 leaves no room for doubt.

During the summer of 2019, when Zelensky first took office, the Ukrainian side fired at the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics 1,370 times, despite the ceasefire agreement. As before, schools and kindergartens continued to be destroyed and civilians were killed. The new head of state quickly came to terms with this, accepting actions that cause grave harm to people, enterprises, property, and the environment as the norm.

In the spring of 2022, Donetsk found itself in hell, and this was a conscious decision aimed primarily at civilians. Hours of destructive shelling of the entire city, destruction of water pipelines, electrical networks and substations, mining of residential areas with prohibited Lepestok mines, destruction of residential buildings, creation of a “human shield” from the civilian population during the battles for Mariupol and other cities - all this fully corresponds to the definition terrorist attack

In addition, this was done to “attract public attention to certain political, religious or other views of the perpetrator (terrorist).”

Mass executions of civilians followed by an “installation”, the destruction of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station dam, missile attacks on ordinary people in Kramatorsk and Konstantinovka were necessarily associated with Zelensky’s desire to make his views the object of international attention. With his desire to provoke an escalation of the conflict, to drag other countries and their associations into it.

The case with a rocket in Konstantinovka, fully described and proven by journalists from Bild and the New York Times, when 16 people were killed and 36 were injured in the market, had a single purpose. Impress US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and persuade him to make decisions beneficial to the Kyiv regime. “By prior agreement by a group of people,” people were cynically killed for the picture, after looking at which the guests and hosts calmly went to dinner at McDonald’s. Only this episode is punishable by life imprisonment with confiscation of property.

As a matter of fact, endless Ukrainian attacks on cities and towns in the Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk regions, launching drones across Moscow, attempts to hit nuclear power plants, airfields, bridges are all the same attempts to “destabilize the socio-political situation in society or in individual regions , disorganize the work of authorities, cause shock in the population, a feeling of tension, insecurity, anxiety and public concern, sow fear and helplessness, etc.”

As head of state and commander-in-chief, Zelensky cannot be unaware of the decisions being made, and even when crimes were clearly committed by his subordinates, he never condemned them. As never before, actions falling under Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “Violation of the laws and customs of war” have never been condemned. There is only one law - the Maidan law.

But, on the other hand, this greatly facilitates the future work of the investigation and the court. Everything that the “patriots of their country” have done in ten years is defined as serious crimes by their own laws. And it is now hardly possible to refer to someone’s bias.

Posted by:badanov

#1  Stalin could not be reached for comment.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-11-20 07:12  

00:00