Submit your comments on this article |
Britain |
UK Hospital Denies a Victim Was Raped Because the Ward Was for 'Women Only' |
2022-03-21 |
![]() The Cloud Cuckoo Landers who 30 years ago may have been living under lock and key in some insane asylum are now taking their place in positions of authority and are dictating how the rest of us should view reality. It would be amusing if there weren’t real-life victims of this nonsense. A British woman reported to police that she had been raped during a stay in a hospital. But the police were told that simply wasn’t possible because the ward where the woman claims she was raped was for "females only." And since there "was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened." Eh? Even XX females — or X0 females, for that matter — can commit rape. It requires equipment not provided by nature, but objects to meet the need are easy enough to find. I’m sure even in benighted England the law defines rape as unwelcome penetration, not unwelcome p3nile penetration. Emma Nicholson, the Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, stood before the members of the House of Lords and pointed out that the rape was caught on CCTV, but it took nearly a year for the hospital to admit there was a transgendered person in the ward who raped the victim.Update: According to Wikipedia, England is actually that benighted. Only p3nile penetration is rape; otherwise it is the lesser crime of assault by penetration. In America we are more logical. Nicholson claimed that the alleged incident was the direct result of a National Health Service policy known as Annex B, which orders hospitals to place patients in single-sex wards according to their preferred gender identity. "The result of Annex B is that hospital trusts inform ward sisters and nurses that if there is a male as a trans person in a female ward, and a female patient or anyone complains, they must be told that it is not true, there is no male there," Nicholson said. She added that the policy "gives priority to trans people over women" and, as a result, erodes the "dignity, privacy and safety" of women and girls. (emphasis added) According to the baroness, the victim came close to a nervous breakdown after spending nearly a year being told that the rape that she experienced never happened. And the hospital would have actually kept denying the victim’s claims if the CCTV cameras hadn’t shown the truth. |
Posted by:Fred |
#3 Modifying the admissions process is not what is needed. Jailing the rapist and everyone involved in the cover-up is what is needed. |
Posted by: Super Hose 2022-03-21 12:54 |
#2 The law does prosecute women for seducing boys and sexually abusing minors. Why can't a case be made for a 'girl with penis' (ugh) raping a woman. After all it is all about the penis? The law just wants to keep creating categories of people it does not have to bother with enforcing itself upon. |
Posted by: Cthulhu of Ryleh 2022-03-21 09:26 |
#1 reductio ad absurdum rĭ-dŭk′tē-ō ăd əb-sûr′dəm, -zûr′-, -shē-ō noun Disproof of a proposition by showing that it leads to absurd or untenable conclusions. |
Posted by: Mercutio 2022-03-21 08:24 |