Submit your comments on this article |
Economy |
Inflation "Unexpectedly" Comes In Lower Than "Expected" |
2017-08-12 |
![]() The Labor Department’s consumer price index rose 0.1 percent compared to the previous month, less than the o.2 percent median forecast of economists. On an annual basis, prices rose 1.7 percent, below the forecast of 1.8 percent. Core inflation, which excludes the more volatile food and energy components of the index, rose 0.1 percent. That was less than the 0.2 percent expected. Year-over-year, core prices were up 1.7 percent, in line with expectations. The continued slowdown in inflation challenges the Fed’s view that lower-than-expected inflation would be "transitory." It could make it harder for the Fed to continue its plan to raise interest rates later this year. The Fed targets 2 percent inflation but does not rely on the Labor Department numbers. It used a Commerce Department price index that will be updated at the end of August. |
Posted by:Spike Spomoter7482 |
#13 Lay off the Fast-Food and your food dollars stretch a long way. My Zojirushi 3-Cup Rice Cooker, A refridgerator, and a microwave made my cooking a lot simpler/cheaper. Bulk dried is so-o-o much cheaper than processed and amazingly cheaper than Fast-Food. |
Posted by: magpie 2017-08-12 17:54 |
#12 Lies, damn lies and FIFY |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2017-08-12 15:58 |
#11 Packaged food prices have been remarkably steady for years. Packaged food sizes, OTOH, not so much. 1 box does not a box make. Crackers down from 12 oz. to 8.5 oz. Lies, damn lies and statistics. |
Posted by: AlanC 2017-08-12 14:26 |
#10 #5 I understand the price of arugula actually went down Posted by g(r)omgoru and Kobe Beef. Sometime in late January |
Posted by: Frank G on the Road 2017-08-12 13:56 |
#9 It's a tool of the Swamp. Get rid of it and replace it with something that makes sense and forces the politicians to do their job instead of hide in the smoke and slime in a hall of mirrors. |
Posted by: gorb 2017-08-12 13:46 |
#8 Rising prices / increased cost of living, without a corresponding rise in wages isn't inflation. More accurate to call it "increasing poverty." |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2017-08-12 13:31 |
#7 They have a few different unemployment numbers as well - pick the one you like! |
Posted by: Raj 2017-08-12 10:31 |
#6 "Core inflation, which excludes the more volatile food and energy components of the index" rather explains the GIGO. |
Posted by: Pappy 2017-08-12 09:31 |
#5 I understand the price of arugula actually went down |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-08-12 08:43 |
#4 All the Fed's prognostications and most econometric research is based on "a basket of goods nobody actually buys..." |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2017-08-12 08:01 |
#3 Their 'inflation' numbers are reliable as their unemployment numbers. Cooked. Then they wonder why their economic programs flounder. Welcome to Caracas. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-08-12 03:36 |
#2 Core inflation, which excludes the more volatile food and energy components of the index There's your answer, gorb. The government has been cooking the numbers for years to avoid raising Social Security payments and anything else indexed to inflation. My own food bills are double what they were just a few years ago. |
Posted by: PBMcL 2017-08-12 03:11 |
#1 Where are these clowns getting their numbers? All prices are up these last few months. I especially noticed food, clothes and hardware. |
Posted by: gorb 2017-08-12 02:41 |