Submit your comments on this article | ||||||||
Home Front: Politix | ||||||||
Trump’s Border Wall, Deportation Plans Face Pushback From GOP | ||||||||
2016-12-31 | ||||||||
![]()
Three Lawmakers want to “ensure that children who were brought here by their parents, through no fault of their own, are able to stay and finish their education and continue to contribute to society,” said Republican Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona. Republicans Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are joining him on a measure drafted by the No. 2 Democratic leader, Dick Durbin of Illinois, that will be introduced after the new Congress convenes Jan. 3. Trump’s campaign was largely powered by his get-tough stance on immigration. A Pew Research Center poll in August found that 79 percent of Trump voters want a border wall, compared with 38 percent of all registered voters. But among lawmakers in Congress, the desire to build a wall along the entire 1,933-mile border with Mexico has evaporated.
“Starting next month, the people are going to get what they asked for,” the Texas Republican said Dec. 9 at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, contending that the "border security surge" plan is as good as a wall. That may not be good enough for Trump, who pushed back after House Speaker Paul Ryan said Dec. 4 on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that "conditions on the ground determine what you need" in different areas of the border. "We’re going to work on the wall, Paul," Trump told a cheering audience when the two appeared together Dec. 13 in Wisconsin on the president-elect’s thank-you tour. "We’re going to build the wall, OK? Believe me." In a Time magazine interview in early December, Trump didn’t back off a promise to cancel Obama’s executive orders on immigration. But he also said he’ll seek a solution on young undocumented immigrants -- known as “Dreamers” after failed legislation to protect them -- that will “make people happy and proud.”
While there, McCain said he holds the view of most Senate Democrats that any border security changes should be part of a broader immigration measure to address the status of some or all of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S.
"I believe that we need to have significant improvements in border enforcement, but I believe the way that you do that is technology primarily," McCain said.
Mexican Foreign Minister Claudia Ruiz Massieu met with Ryan in Washington on Dec. 14 to discuss the U.S.-Mexico relationship. She also met with Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, to discuss Mexico’s support for the bipartisan bill protecting younger undocumented immigrants.
McCaul in 2015 advanced a measure through his committee that would have required the Department of Homeland Security to achieve operational control of the Southwest border in five years, based on a sector-by-sector analysis. The agency’s political appointees would be denied pay raises and bonuses if the bill’s goals weren’t met. He has indicated his new proposal will be more extensive, coming under a Republican president who sees the border as a bigger priority. “We must start with an immediate border security ‘surge,’” McCaul said at the Heritage Foundation. “We have started to work on emergency plans in Congress to build the tough array of barriers we need along the border, close all gaps and defend American sovereignty." In the Senate, Homeland Security and Government Reform Chairman Ron Johnson says he isn’t in a hurry. He says he wants to wait until the confirmation of retired Marine General John Kelly, Trump’s choice to lead the Department of Homeland Security, and to work with him on a proposal. In the meantime, Johnson recently returned from a trip to Israel to discuss border security with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and examine nearly 160 miles of steel fencing that separates Israel from the Sinai. Johnson estimates it might cost the U.S. about $4 billion to build something similar along portions of the border with Mexico, and wants to consider whether Israel’s approach offers a model.
Regardless of the pace of the broader debate, Congress could add funds for border security to the next spending bill to keep the U.S. government open after current funding expires April 28. While Trump promised to make Mexico pay for the changes, few lawmakers see that as a realistic goal -- at least not initially.
Freedom Caucus members see border security as a “major problem, and the American people want it built," Meadows of North Carolina said in an interview. "We can probably move the funds from something that is not paid-for to the wall." The last significant action on immigration was in 2013, when the Senate voted 68-32 for its plan that included a path to legal residency and $46 billion to secure the U.S-Mexico border. The bill would have doubled the Border Patrol’s size by adding 20,000 agents, required 700 miles of border fencing, and added unmanned drones to help police the border. The House didn’t consider the bill. | ||||||||
Posted by:Steve White |
#6 I'm with Casey Stengel: "Can't anybody here play this game?" |
Posted by: Pappy 2016-12-31 21:02 |
#5 Well they have had no backbone so far. Media fake news. |
Posted by: Dale 2016-12-31 16:57 |
#4 Obstructionists congress-critters will be up for re-election sometime in the near future. The voters may have to impose term limits on them. I thought the legislation for a building a wall was already in place from several years back. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2016-12-31 15:28 |
#3 Trump is NOT a conservative. Define conservative. If you think Lindsey Graham is a conservative then, OK, I'm a liberal. |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2016-12-31 13:15 |
#2 Sigh. How did I know as soon as I read the headline that Lindsey Graham was involved? |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2016-12-31 13:13 |
#1 As the new year approaches I vow not to repeat the same comments on every Trump vs The RINO's article. But God Allmighty, in every sense of the description Trump is the ultimate RINO. He's new to the party and only for a vehicle for his Presidential run. And even then he threatened to break as an independent. Moreover, Trump has had (and continues to have) nothing but contempt for the party apparatus. He breaks with a number of traditional Republican policies. Trump is NOT a conservative. In fact, many of his proposals are liberal. He has a thumbless grasp of the US Constitution and could give shit who cares. He has even boasted that he will continue Croney capitalism as way to "get things done". His foreign policy is clouded but certainly breaks with traditional Pub orthodoxy. This is NOT a judgment on the man nor his policies. This is an observation of an absurd narrative developing that it's spineless politicians standing in a true Republican President's way. |
Posted by: DepotGuy 2016-12-31 12:18 |