| Maybe not, but there does seem to be a strong set of progressive transnational socialist goals, fuzzily-defined tho they might be. |
| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Politix | |
| No Master Plan at All? | |
| 2009-10-05 | |
| |
| Posted by:lotp |
| #4 I'm beginning to think that Obumble is only a distraction, and the real culprits (and cretins, criminals, and cutthroats) are the "czars" he's appointed. THEY are the ones trying to do the dirty work while Obumble gets the spotlight. Their "plan" is to see how much they can scam from the government before they're forced to flee, like cockroaches when the light's turned on. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2009-10-05 23:08 |
| #3 I see only one "Goal" and yes it's unannounced. MAKE OBAMALOOK VERY IMPORTANT there's no other goal at all. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-10-05 19:11 |
| #2 Fred, will you please remove the word "Ci@lis" from the spam filter list? |
| Posted by: Parabellum 2009-10-05 08:46 |
| #1 fuzzily-defined tho they might be Cause definitive goals are measurable. When the 'touchy feely' doesn't then work, people would recognize it as the failure for what it is. When classical liberalism pushed through equal opportunity and the poor continued behaviors which kept them poor, they fell back upon social@ism with equal outcome as their goal regardless of individual effort. That's why they fuzz up the goals because there's nothing left for them after social@ism fails to end poverty (social justice). They won't recognize that with human free will there will always be some poor. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-10-05 07:38 |