You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australian-made torpedo sinks US warship
2008-07-25
* Australian-made torpedo sinks US warship
* Warship was due to be retired
* Explosive fun part of war games

AN Australian submarine has used a new super torpedo to sink an American warship off Hawaii.

The Courier-Mail reports HMAS Waller fired the heavyweight Mark 48 torpedo, which the US and Australian navies say is the world's deadliest, during war games this week.

Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the torpedo had been jointly developed by Australia and the United States and was used in the planned sinking of a retired US warship.

"This represents the first new heavyweight torpedo warshot to be fired by either Navy. Just as significant is the fact that the torpedo was assembled in Australia," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

Video @ link
Posted by:Oztralian

#22  Sounds like she took a hell of a pounding before they had to go in and scuttle her.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-25 18:42  

#21  from Wikipedia
[5]

On 25 February 2005 a ceremony to salute the USS America and her crew was held at the ship's pier in Philadelphia, attended by former crew members and various dignitaries. She departed the Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility on 19 April 2005 to conduct the aforementioned tests. The experiments lasted approximately four weeks. The Navy battered America with explosives, both underwater and above the surface, watching from afar and through monitoring devices placed on the vessel. These explosions were designed to simulate attacks by torpedoes, cruise missiles and perhaps a small boat suicide attack like the one that damaged the destroyer Cole in Yemen in 2000.

After the completion of the tests, America was sunk in a controlled scuttling on 14 May 2005 at approximately 1130, although the sinking was not publicized until six days later. At the time, no warship of that size had ever been sunk, and effects were closely monitored; theoretically the tests would reveal data about how supercarriers respond to battle damage. The ship rests 16,860 ft. below the Atlantic Ocean surface, roughly 250 miles off the North Carolina coast.[6]


The ship was sunk at the edge of the Sargasso Sea.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-07-25 17:51  

#20  "That MK-48 is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-07-25 17:10  

#19  NS; Please elaborate on the scuttling of the America; it was my understanding it was a dedicated target to evaluate new threats against a carrier.

thanks.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-07-25 16:55  

#18  Can't find any longer video but here's a series of stills.

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/download/2008/Jul/20080724a/index.htm
Posted by: tu3031   2008-07-25 16:06  

#17  It would be interesting to see the whole recording. But clearly the keel was broken. This ship was out of action and not returning to port for repairs. How long it took to sink was interesting but irrelevant.

The America, on the other hand, had to be scuttled. But again, we don't know what was thrown at it.

There are only two kinds of ships, subs and targets. The sooner the USN figures this out, the better.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-07-25 14:39  

#16  Re: "A tin can ain't much of a test. Don't we have any old cruisers or battleships? Maybe a carrier?"

it would have been intereisting to know what Damage Control Status the ship was in; if Zebra was set , then that is pretty impressive, if Yoke then not so much. but a broken keel is still a death blow.

And we sank the USS America a few years back to test a lot of 'stuff.' No word has surfaced about what it took to do it.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-07-25 14:15  

#15  Sunken ships make great marine habitat.
Posted by: wxjames   2008-07-25 13:34  

#14  Doesn't have to work against carriers, battleships, or cruisers. Most countries don't have them.
Might be interesting to see what it could do against a supertanker or a container boat.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-07-25 12:56  

#13  Mark this - the Aussies and their very quiet electric subs are top notch - the boats and the crews.
Posted by: OldSpook   2008-07-25 12:56  

#12  Looks like it worked a lot better than the Mark 14.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-07-25 12:47  

#11  I, for one, am glad Oztralian keeps sending us interesting and useful information (intersecting sets, those) from Australia, even if occasionally misposted. After all, it's our job to keep the moderators from getting bored. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-07-25 12:21  

#10  A tin can ain't much of a test. Don't we have any old cruisers or battleships? Maybe a carrier?
Posted by: mojo   2008-07-25 12:14  

#9  I, for one, welcome our new Australian overlords and volunteer to be Elle McPherson's love slave.
Posted by: JDB   2008-07-25 11:37  

#8  U.S.S. Ray, DD971 Spruance class destoryer.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-07-25 10:16  

#7  Looks like a Spruance class.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spruance_class_destroyer
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-25 10:13  

#6  Broke the keel in two. Anybody know what class destroyer that is?
Posted by: tu3031   2008-07-25 10:04  

#5  fired the heavyweight Mark 48 torpedo

They making it under license?

Sneaky Aussies got ummm.. Z. Brain working for them. Which ain't fair.
Posted by: .5MT   2008-07-25 09:57  

#4  Nice shooting, boys.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-07-25 08:42  

#3  Warshot? Are we at war with Australia now? Pity, I rather liked them.
Posted by: gromky   2008-07-25 06:02  

#2  STRATEGYPAGE > RUN SILENT, RUN CHEAP [The USN's trouble wid SSK's?] + WAFF.com > STRATPAGE again > US NAVY TO GIVE UP ITS NEW SHIP DESIGNS???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-07-25 02:10  

#1  Sorry guys, i seem to have posted this in the wrong section. Will take more care & notice next time :)


...Rantburg rocks...
Posted by: Oztralian   2008-07-25 02:00  

00:01