Submit your comments on this article | |
Down Under | |
No bail in 'formidable' terror case | |
2007-12-17 | |
![]() Mr Jamal's lawyer Greg Scragg argued there were exceptional circumstances in favour of his client being granted bail, among them his ill-health due to gallstones and the weakness of the crown case.
He said the crown had evidence to suggest Mr Jamal was linked to the ordering of industrial chemicals, and also to extremist material, including a bomb-making manual. In referring to his eight co-accused, Justice Whealy also said there was evidence to suggest they held "common beliefs". "Each of the conspirators considers himself to be a devout Muslim," Justice Whealy said. He also said the group believed Islam "throughout the world has been under attack and there is a religious obligation to come to the defence". He also said the crown case pointed to a belief in "violent jihad ... including the killing of infidels." Justice Whealy dismissed the application for bail but issued an order for Mr Jamal's medical case to be elevated on the surgical list to prevent a clash with his trial. Mr Jamal has been in custody since his arrest in late 2005. | |
Posted by:Oztralian |
#2 RENSE > VET - CLAIMS BUSH DROPPED FIVE ATOMIC BOMBS ON IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN??? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-12-17 22:23 |
#1 A Sydney man facing a terrorism-related trial has been denied bail after a judge said there was evidence to show he supported the "killing of infidels". Has anybody actually read the Koran? This is like charging a Mormon for riding a bicycle while wearing a jacket and tie. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2007-12-17 09:15 |