You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: WoT
Fjordman: Muslim Violence — Crime or Jihad?
2007-03-18
Although the European Union warns against “,” those who live in the real world know that there has been an explosion of violent infidelophobia in Western Europe staged by Muslim immigrants. This wave of violence especially targets Jews, but the attacks against Christians that are going on in the the Middle East, where there may soon be no Christians left in the cradle of Christianity, are increasingly spreading to Europe as well. In more and more cities across the continent, non-Muslims are being harassed, robbed, mugged, raped, stabbed and even killed by Muslims, yet EU leaders continue their quest to merge Europe and the Arab world by making it easier for Muslims to enter and settle in Europe.

The fact that European leaders and media voice such concern for “Islamophobia” yet do very little to stop attacks against Christian Europeans demonstrates the creeping dhimmitude in Europe which has been accurately predicted by Bat Ye’or. Native Europeans are slowly becoming second-rate citizens in their own countries.

This violence by Muslims is usually labelled simply as “crime,” but I believe it should more accurately be called Jihad. Those who know early Islamic history, as described in books such as The Truth About Muhammad by Robert Spencer, know that looting and stealing the property of non-Muslims has been part and parcel of Jihad from the very beginning. In fact, so much of the behavior of Muhammad himself and the early Muslims could be deemed criminal that it is difficult to know exactly where crime ends and Jihad begins. In the city of Oslo, for instance, it is documented that some of the criminal Muslim gangs also have close ties to radical religious groups at home and abroad. As Dutch Arabist Hans Jansen points out, the Koran is seen by some Muslims as a God-given “hunting licence,” granting them the right to assault and even murder non-Muslims.
Rest at link.
Posted by:ed

#4  Arabs been skulking on the outskirts of Mid-Eastern civilization for (at least) 3000 years. Stealing everything not nailed down. Then Muhammad came and their normal way of making a living become Holy Jihad.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-03-18 16:47  

#3  excrete by "belching"

This certainly accounts for much of their clerical oratory.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-18 13:41  

#2  This violence by Muslims is usually labelled simply as “crime,” but I believe it should more accurately be called Jihad.

If we had a single American candidate who was so plainspoken, I vote for that person regardless of party affiliation. Fjordman may end up being EuropeÂ’s savior, if they would only read his work.

In fact, so much of the behavior of Muhammad himself and the early Muslims could be deemed criminal that it is difficult to know exactly where crime ends and Jihad begins.

TÂ’is merely a continuum of applied Islamic doctrine.

As Dutch Arabist Hans Jansen points out, the Koran is seen by some Muslims as a God-given “hunting licence,” granting them the right to assault and even murder non-Muslims.

There can be only one reply:



Jens Orback, Democracy Minister in the previous Social Democratic Swedish government, said during a radio debate that: “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”

Just another of many dhimmis who steadfastly refuse to learn from history. Where, since IslamÂ’s very beginning, is there a single case of leniencey being shown to those who have treated Muslims fairly to begin with? Ingratitude is a congenital feature of Islam and its followers.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-03-18 13:39  

#1  Google "Calcutta Koran Petition" to read of an actual court petition to have the Koran - a "manual of jihad" terror - banned. The Muslim "prophet" - self-appointed and without any objective basis - personally participated in hundreds of instances of war, plunder, hostage taking, arson, rape, torture, crop destruction, genocide, etc. One month before his exile journey (hijira), he claimed that his concocted deity ("allah") ordered abrogation of all the Koran prohibitions against violence. Once he set up his terror base in Medina (a Jewish majority village named Yethrib), he began his campaign of revenge and slaughter. Each and every martyr enticement - 72 hymen-regenerating sex-toys (houris) and 28 boys ("smooth as pearls"), rivers of wine, foods native only to the Hijaz area, crap and urination free eating and drinking (Muslims in "heaven" excrete by "belching"), began after the abrogation (nakash). When Pig-One of Islam realized that Jews weren't buying him as a "prophet," he concocted another abrogation, and forced Muslims to cease praying in the direction of Jerusalem, and towards Mecca. Although it is speculative, the omission of references to Jerusalem (al-quds) in the unholy koran, suggests that the phony prophet revised the koran, which is claimed to be the word of the-god, as dictated through an "angel." In any case, the koran was not put into writing for 17 years, when Muslims ruled Syria and put in their script (written Arabic is a derivative of Syriac).
Posted by: Sneaze   2007-03-18 11:48  

00:00