Submit your comments on this article | ||
-Short Attention Span Theater- | ||
Forecaster predicts busy 2007 U.S. hurricane season | ||
2006-12-08 | ||
![]()
A long-range forecast for next year issued by Tropical Storm Risk, a London-based forecaster, on Thursday predicted an above-normal Atlantic hurricane season with a strong probability that more hurricanes will slam into the United States than usual, based on average figures for the period 1950 to 2006. It said that 16 tropical storms were likely to occur in the Atlantic basin, nine of which would be hurricanes and four likely to be so-called intense hurricanes. Five tropical storms are likely to hit America, of which two will be hurricanes, TSR said. It anticipated a combination of conditions that would indicate a higher-than-average hurricane season. In 2007 the trade winds, which blow westwards from the tropical Atlantic and Caribbean Sea, will be weaker than normal, while the sea temperatures between west Africa and the Caribbean, where many hurricanes form, will be warmer than normal, TSR said. For those who may be inclined to disregard such ominous warnings following this year's widely [That should be wildly - ed.] inaccurate predictions of another string of major storms similar to those that ravaged the U.S. coast in 2004 and 2005, TSR said an unusual mix of conditions led to fewer windstorms than were predicted. "The below-average 2006 hurricane season was due to the presence of considerable African dry air and Saharan dust during August and September, which inhibited thunderstorm occurrence and therefore tropical storm development, and to the unexpected onset of El Nino conditions from mid-September," TSR said. "There is no precedent for these factors together having been so influential before," it added.
| ||
Posted by:.com |
#22 Hope its more accurate/reliable than for 2006, andor the new SOLAR FLARE!? Considering the fuzzy-wuzziness on TV-Raaadios + Residential power blackouts + stronger daylight luminations here on Guam last month, no surprise for me iff the Solar Flare news is behind. DARTH VADER [breathing] > THE FORCE IS STRONG WITH THIS ONE. SPACEWAR.com > US BMD TEST ABORTS. HEY MADONNA, THE FIREBALL(S) WENT THE WRONG WAY - HOW CAN WE WIN THE WAR [Guam saying]??? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-12-08 21:27 |
#21 This will become an annual story that follows by 4 days the inflation report on the cost of the presents in the Twelve Days of Christmas. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-12-08 19:51 |
#20 I definitely can not remember a season where we didn't even get hit once, and yet, we came out "largely unscathed?" Well, we did get peed on by Alberto and Ernesto....I guess that counts. ;) |
Posted by: Swamp Blondie 2006-12-08 19:44 |
#19 I look at it this way though. Our |
Posted by: BA 2006-12-08 14:39 |
#18 "Busy" is not a prediction, it's a characterization. "17 hurricanes" is a prediction. |
Posted by: mojo 2006-12-08 13:27 |
#17 Also see an interview with the good Doctor. |
Posted by: Bobby 2006-12-08 12:57 |
#16 Further on #10 - Dr. William M. Gray was the first (I think) to do annual forecasts, starting maybe 20 years ago, for which he was scorned. After a number of years of being successful, people began to pay attention. When he became publically skeptical of global warming, during the Clinton Administration, his Federal funds suddenly evaporated. He retired from Colorado State University shortly thereafter, but continues to forecast. Checking Wikipedia, I am pretty close. This season, he was forced to revise his forecast - twice, and downward both times. That may be a record in itself. |
Posted by: Bobby 2006-12-08 12:54 |
#15 I predict a constant stream of bullshit from the macaca with difficult to pass chunks at 7 and 11 PM daily. The bullshit will flow over several macaca outlets without regard for accuracy, or effects of the uninterrupted flow and stench. Nawlins may sink beneath it, again. |
Posted by: wxjames 2006-12-08 12:23 |
#14 Predict a busy liberal/environmentalist/communist/socialist season in '07. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2006-12-08 12:13 |
#13 Five tropical storms and two hurricanes to reach US landfall is considered a busy season? |
Posted by: john 2006-12-08 10:43 |
#12 You forgot the hermaphrodites, Broadhead6. Doesn't that occur on the order of 0.5%? ;-) |
Posted by: trailing wife 2006-12-08 10:37 |
#11 I predict every pregnant human being on the planet will have either a boy or girl this year. |
Posted by: Broadhead6 2006-12-08 10:21 |
#10 for what its worth, Dr. Grey, who is the long time primo hurricane forecaster, is a Global Warming Sceptic. |
Posted by: mhw 2006-12-08 10:18 |
#9 Yes, they do. |
Posted by: kelly 2006-12-08 10:08 |
#8 Geez, the mind boggles. I definitely can not remember a season where we didn't even get hit once, and yet, we came out "largely unscathed?" And, they didn't expect the el Nino effect this year, but they expect us to believe they can predict temps to the 3rd decimal place in the year 2110? Give me a flyin' break! |
Posted by: BA 2006-12-08 09:35 |
#7 CORERECTION! Forecaster predicts busy 2007 Gorbal wamring season |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan 2006-12-08 09:18 |
#6 Wank-o-matic |
Posted by: SR-71 2006-12-08 07:05 |
#5 Being a bunch of agenda-driven assholes means never /Dan Rather |
Posted by: .com 2006-12-08 02:35 |
#4 You can see the el nino clearly here. Also, 2006 was the first year since the 1920s that no hurricanes struck the US mainland. In a rational world that would be big news. I haven't seen a single mention of that fact in the MSM. I know because I checked the records. |
Posted by: phil_b 2006-12-08 01:55 |
#3 Lol, phil_b. |
Posted by: .com 2006-12-08 00:44 |
#2 "The below-average 2006 hurricane season was due to the presence of considerable African dry air and Saharan dust during August and September, which inhibited thunderstorm occurrence and therefore tropical storm development Maybe the answer to the hurricane problem is to kick up a lot of dust in the Sahara. Got to be cheaper than rebuilding New Orleans. |
Posted by: Baba Tutu 2006-12-08 00:32 |
#1 This year's el nino is stronger than last year, indicating another below average hurricane season. |
Posted by: phil_b 2006-12-08 00:27 |