Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
DPRK Foreign Ministry Refutes "Resolution of UN Security Council" |
2006-07-18 |
![]() The U.S. has recently kicked up much row after bringing the issue of the missile launches conducted by our army as part of the routine military training for self-defence to the UN under the motto of reacting to it in one voice. It was against this backdrop that the U.S. forced the UN to adopt a UN Security Council resolution taking a serious note of our exercise of its right to self-defence on July 15. The U.S. sponsored "resolution" called for an international pressure for disarming the DPRK and stifling it, terming the missile launches pertaining to its right to self-defence "a threat to international peace and security". By doing so the U.S. sought to describe the issue between the DPRK and the U.S. as an issue between the DPRK and the UN and form an international alliance against the DPRK. This has brought such serious consequences as gravely violating the dignity and sovereignty of the DPRK and driving the situation to an extreme pitch of tension, thereby seriously disturbing peace and security on the peninsula and in Northeast Asia. It was an entirely unreasonable and brigandish act that the U.S. brought to the UN the DPRK's missile launches nothing contradictory to any international law after branding them as a violation. |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Wonder what they'll say after Vandenburg torches one off tomorrow morning (scheduled for between 1am and 7am PDT) in a test that's reportedly been scheduled for more than a month? I can imagine the frothing already. |
Posted by: FOTSGreg 2006-07-18 14:12 |
#6 Sigh... look, it isn't a geometrical proof. You can't "refute" the resolution of a deliberative body. You can denounce it, defy it, rebuke the deliberative body, threaten it, ignore it, or defecate upon its decision. But you can't define it out of existence by refutation. You can't make it not happen, not so long as you haven't control over the history books. |
Posted by: Mitch H. 2006-07-18 12:52 |
#5 What, no mention of juche? I'm disappointed. I give it a 2 out of 5 stars. |
Posted by: BA 2006-07-18 10:40 |
#4 Technically, by refusing to accept the imposition of UN sanctions agz it, North Korea can or may be formally referred to the UNSC for mil action. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-07-18 03:16 |
#3 I dunno, I liked 'kicked up much row' ... |
Posted by: Steve White 2006-07-18 01:25 |
#2 I give it a 2.5, but only because they used 'brigandish'. |
Posted by: Pappy 2006-07-18 00:44 |
#1 Danger! Spittle at Force 5... |
Posted by: mojo 2006-07-18 00:09 |