Submit your comments on this article |
Science & Technology |
New web addresses created by internet chiefs |
2006-07-16 |
![]() Every device that is connected to the internet — websites, computers and mobile phones — needs an “internet address” to locate it on the network. When the internet was developed in the 1980s, programmers had no idea how big it would become. They gave each address a “16-bit” number, which meant that the total number of available addresses worked out at about four billion (2 to the power of 32). But as use grew, it became clear that the old protocol, IPv4, wasn’t big enough, so a new one was written based on “32-bit numbers”. That increased the number of available addresses to 340 undecillion, 282 decillion, 366 nonillion, 920 octillion, 938 septillion — enough for the foreseeable future, Mr Kessens said. IPv6 does not involve any new cables being laid, nor will there be any burden on customers, for whom the change will appear seamless. It will, however, greatly improve the quality of certain internet services, in particular phone calls, which are not suited to IPv4. “The big change is going to be in peer-to-peer services like gaming and file-sharing, which are going to become much easier to use,” Mr Kessens said. |
Posted by:Fred |
#12 The 6 is a version number, not a number of bytes. Has anyone tried explaining IPv6 to Ted Stevens yet? |
Posted by: Eric Jablow 2006-07-16 22:37 |
#11 "My understanding is that IPv6 will be notated as a sixteen bit hexadecimal number to six numbers." Your understanding is incorrect. IPv6 addresses are 128 bits in length and are expressed in a 16 byte hexadecimal format with colons delineating the individual bytes. A good starting POINT for anyone interested in educating themselves on IPv6. -M |
Posted by: Manolo 2006-07-16 10:04 |
#10 9 Guess I overlooked something here... Hot coffee alert in future Mr Gore! LOL! |
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412 2006-07-16 09:07 |
#9 Guess I overlooked something here... |
Posted by: Al Gore 2006-07-16 08:12 |
#8 IPv6 has been in the works for over a decade. A lot of software in client machines and servers will need upgrading to use it. A bigger issue will be who allocates the space - look for more fighting about IANA and who "runs the internet". |
Posted by: lotp 2006-07-16 08:08 |
#7 I think it might be easier to get rid of the 2 billion extra people than to add 340,282,366,920,937,999,999,999,999,998,000,000,000 extra addresses. I've got a little list they'll none of them be missed. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-07-16 07:31 |
#6 Isn there a ARE in these hexynumbers? my family wonts to claim addresser space BR549 |
Posted by: J Sample 2006-07-16 07:09 |
#5 My understanding is that IPv6 will be notated as a sixteen bit hexadecimal number to six numbers. So that would be 65536 to the sixth power, all written in hex. 9.7 and 23 zeros. A large number to be sure. IPv4 was based on 8 bit numbers in four octals, 256 to the fourth power, or 4.2+ billion addresses, expressed in decimal form. |
Posted by: badanov 2006-07-16 05:41 |
#4 IP-Carrier, Lat, Long, Alt. (random #) Would help with the WoT! :-) |
Posted by: gorb 2006-07-16 04:34 |
#3 128 vs. 32, not 32 vs. 16. This is 4 billion times 4 billion times 4 billion (2^^96) times the size of the IPv4 address space (2^^32). This works out to be: 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 |
Posted by: twobyfour 2006-07-16 03:38 |
#2 I would prefer GPS coord type ips IP-Carrier, Lat, Long, Alt. (random #) Then one would not need DNS just a GPS on each network card and a carrier id. Local nets would be 192 type IP-Carrier code. Wireless could do hopping and anealing really well. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-07-16 02:02 |
#1 Somebody can't do binary arithmetic. |
Posted by: ed 2006-07-16 01:39 |