| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq-Jordan |
| US Military Prison in Iraq Hid CIA Prisoner From Red Cross |
| 2004-06-17 |
| From The New York Times Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, acting at the request of George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, ordered military officials in Iraq last November to hold a man suspected of being a senior Iraqi terrorist at a high-level detention center there but not list him on the prison’s rolls, senior Pentagon and intelligence officials said Wednesday. This prisoner and other "ghost detainees" were hidden largely to prevent the International Committee of the Red Cross from monitoring their treatment, and to avoid disclosing their location to an enemy, officials said. Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba, the Army officer who in February investigated abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison, criticized the practice of allowing ghost detainees there and at other detention centers as "deceptive, contrary to Army doctrine, and in violation of international law." This prisoner, who has not been named, is believed to be the first to have been kept off the books at the orders of Mr. Rumsfeld and Mr. Tenet. He was not held at Abu Ghraib, but at another prison, Camp Cropper, on the outskirts of Baghdad International Airport, officials said. Pentagon and intelligence officials said the decision to hold the detainee without registering him - at least initially - was in keeping with the administration’s legal opinion about the status of those viewed as an active threat in wartime. Seven months later, however, the detainee - a reputed senior officer of Ansar al-Islam, a group the United States has linked to Al Qaeda and blames for some attacks in Iraq - is still languishing at the prison but has only been questioned once while in detention, in what government officials acknowledged was an extraordinary lapse. "Once he was placed in military custody, people lost track of him," a senior intelligence official conceded Wednesday night. "The normal review processes that would keep track of him didn’t." .... In July 2003, the man suspected of being an Ansar al-Islam official was captured in Iraq and turned over to C.I.A. officials, who took him to an undisclosed location outside of Iraq for interrogation. By that fall, however, a C.I.A. legal analysis determined that because the detainee was deemed to be an Iraqi unlawful combatant - outside the protections of the Geneva Conventions - he should be transferred back to Iraq. Mr. Tenet made his request to Mr. Rumsfeld - that the suspect be held but not listed - in October. The request was passed down the chain of command .... At each stage, lawyers reviewed the request and their bosses approved it. ... The suspected Ansar official was segregated from the other detainees and was not listed on the rolls. Under the order that had filtered down to General Sanchez, military police were not to disclose the detainee’s whereabouts to the Red Cross pending further directives. ... Before this case surfaced, the C.I.A. has said it had discontinued the ghost detainee practice, but said that the Geneva Conventions allowed a delay in the identification of prisoners to avoid disclosing their whereabouts to an enemy. ... |
| Posted by:Mike Sylwester |
| #6 Question for the NYT: And your point would be....? |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2004-06-17 10:26:12 PM |
| #5 Maybe he owed them money? |
| Posted by: BH 2004-06-17 1:42:04 PM |
| #4 Okay, so what's the problem? There's a Republican in the White House. |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-06-17 11:20:44 AM |
| #3 At each stage, lawyers reviewed the request and their bosses approved it. ... Okay, so what's the problem? |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-17 11:16:50 AM |
| #2 By that fall, however, a C.I.A. legal analysis determined that because the detainee was deemed to be an Iraqi unlawful combatant - outside the protections of the Geneva Conventions - he should be transferred back to Iraq. The Red Cross has no business involving unlawful combatants, since unlawful combatants are not POWs. I'd ask why the press isn't making the whole unlawful combatant issue clearer, but I already know the answer. |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-06-17 10:27:40 AM |
| #1 This is insane. Why in the world do we want the WaPo reporting on CIA operations in Iraq? And what is worse, they are using masked sources, a surefire indicator that some elements of the story is patently false. This shows the WaPo's sympathies lie more with our enemies and our prisoners than it does with our military and our allies. |
| Posted by: badanov 2004-06-17 9:02:31 AM |