Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 09/25/2026 View Thu 09/24/2026 View Wed 09/23/2026 View Tue 09/22/2026 View Mon 09/21/2026 View Sun 09/20/2026 View Sat 09/19/2026
2026-09-07 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
New: US Envoy to Syria Now Walks Back Comments Contradicting U.S. Policy
[RedState] Someone went native. Recall and fire
On Friday, something occurred that raised a few eyebrows at the State Department and in the Trump administration. A U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria appears to have pushed the clutch down, letting his memory free-wheel while making a statement about Israel and the Golan Heights.

Ambassador Tom Barrack, speaking with Lebanese-Australian entrepreneur Mario Nawfal on Friday, observed that Israel "still" occupies the Golan Heights. That's technically incorrect, at least according to the policy of the United States, for which Ambassador Barrack works; President Trump officially recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights in 2019, a position that remained in place during the Biden administration. That means, according to official U.S. policy, Israel is not occupying the Golan Heights. The Golan Heights are Israel's home territory.

Now, Ambassador Barrack is walking those comments back.

The U.S. special envoy to Syria and ambassador to Turkey on Sunday walked back his comments from two days ago that Israel "still" occupies the Golan Heights in violation of U.N. resolutions, remarks that went against U.S. President Donald Trump ’s position on the disputed territory.

Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war and annexed it in 1981. The United Nations and most of the international community consider the territory occupied Syrian land and do not recognize Israel’s annexation of it.

In 2019, Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over the territory, reversing decades of U.S. policy.

Ambassador Tom Barrack on Friday said that Israel "still" occupies the territory in an interview with Lebanese-Australian entrepreneur Mario Nawfal.

Barrack now says that was a description of the territory’s historical status, "not an endorsement of the United Nations’ position" on the Golan.


He also, in that same interview with the AP, gave a reason for the earlier comments:

He said he intended to explain why he does not anticipate annexation in Lebanon, where Israeli forces are occupying parts of the south after the latest Israel-Hezbollah war, and to argue that negotiated agreements, rather than territorial maps, are more durable and that he had cited the Golan as an example that "territory taken by force remains contested for generations."

In the Friday interview, Barrack had also criticized Israel’s strikes on an airbase in northern Syria earlier last week. Israeli officials said the strikes intended to prevent Turkey from establishing a presence at the base.





# id) ?>
Posted by Frank G 2026-09-07 01:44|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [197 views ]  Top
 File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life, & Kleptocrats 

19:25 Silentbrick
19:08 Frank G
18:42 NoMoreBS
18:28 Mercutio
18:10 Chantry
17:38 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
17:24 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
17:12 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
16:49 trailing wife
16:45 trailing wife
16:25 trailing wife
16:24 trailing wife
16:21 Gloluter Phavick7614
16:18 Gloluter Phavick7614
14:46 NN2N1
14:13 Rambler
14:09 trailing wife
13:26 Mercutio
12:59 Skidmark
12:39 Skidmark
12:34 mossomo
12:30 mossomo
12:15 MikeKozlowski
11:56 Procopius2k
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com