Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 09/25/2026 View Thu 09/24/2026 View Wed 09/23/2026 View Tue 09/22/2026 View Mon 09/21/2026 View Sun 09/20/2026 View Sat 09/19/2026
2026-06-18 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
‘Shall not develop nuclear weapons’: The 14-point memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran
Do we really believe Iran will stick to the terms for sixty days to get to the point of signing the thing?
[IsraelTimes] Sides declare ‘immediate, permanent end to war on all fronts, including Lebanon’; fate of Iran’s enriched uranium will be ‘adequately addressed in final deal’ to be inked within 60 days

The following is the text of the memorandum of understanding that the United States says it electronically signed with Iran on Sunday to end their war and launch 60 days of talks on Iran’s nuclear program and other outstanding disputes. The text was read aloud to reporters by a senior US official during a phone briefing on Wednesday. An earlier version of this story featured the text of a previous MOU draft.

1. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war, by signing this MOU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph.

2. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.

3. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in a maximum of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.

4. Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

5. Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and de-mining by the Islamic Republic of Iran, will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states, in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.

6. The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers, and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.

7. The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue above-mentioned and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations, in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

8. The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven with the minimum methodology to be down-blending on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues above mentioned and express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.

9. Pending the final deal, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

10. The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MOU and until the termination of sanctions, the US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

11. The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of the MOU. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly.

12. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MOU and the future compliance of the final deal.

13. After signing this MOU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11 of this MOU, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.

14. The final deal will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution.

Responses, before and after the text was released:
Trump suggests Israel in no place to criticize Iran deal for not joining 2020 strike on Soleimani
[IsraelTimes] US president spends much of G7 press conference haranguing Israel, which he calls a ‘very small partner’ as he lashes out at ‘those so-called geniuses who… didn’t blow up’ the Iranian general

As deal takes force, Trump says ‘it’s okay’ for Iran to have some ballistic missiles
[IsraelTimes] US president claims at G7 that additional strikes would have led to global economic catastrophe, before again threatening to bomb the Islamic Republic if it doesn’t comply with deal.

Hezbollah chief: Iran deal a ‘great victory,’ can be used to expel Israel from Lebanon
[IsraelTimes] Naim Qassem thanks Iran for tying Lebanon to deal with US, says talks with Israel must only be limited to ‘mutual security,’ insists terror group’s disarmament is internal matter.

Hezbollah expecting major cash injection from Iran once deal sealed with US — sources
[IsraelTimes] US official says funds going to terror group will not be unfrozen, as analysts say outcome of war will be political boon to Hezbollah, will bolster its resistance narrative

Op-Ed: Trump’s deal is a catastrophic capitulation to Iran’s aggressors, leaves Israel vulnerable and constrained
[IsraelTimes] In the US president’s reality-challenged view, Israel is an ingrate and a warmonger, while Iran’s mass-murdering leaders are ‘very rational.’ They are indeed all too rational, and he, clearly, is not.

Trump: MOU with Iran ‘not final,’ we’ll go ‘back to dropping bombs’ if talks fail
# id) ?>
Posted by trailing wife 2026-06-18 2026-06-18 02:22|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1868 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

1 Israel's own fault for forgetting how Tramp behaved after loosing 2020 elections.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 02:36||   2026-06-18 02:36|| Front Page Top

2 ...Well, there is a joke I've seen on YouTube.

G*d announces to the faithful that in 3 days Earth will be completely covered by water.
A rabbi gathers his congregation: "People, we have 3 days to learn how to live underwater.".
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 02:45||   2026-06-18 02:45|| Front Page Top

3 Everything is Trumps fault? Accountability, learn the term and stfu.
Posted by Chris 2026-06-18 02:45||   2026-06-18 02:45|| Front Page Top

4 Chris, my boy, it'll take you a couple of years - you're sorta slow - but you will curse the day you voted for Trump over DeSantis in primaries.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 02:54||   2026-06-18 02:54|| Front Page Top

5 If the operations of 2025/2026 at least kicked the can down the road, then the $300 billion and the lifting of asset freezes and sanctions will drag that same can up the road again.

Iran can have ballistic missiles and free from sanctions they can just buy nuclear warheads from North Korea or China.

Trump's personal committment to a nuclear weapons free Iran will become politically irrelevant on 1/20/2029.

The West obviously lacks any serious will to self defense and self preservation.
Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2026-06-18 03:20||   2026-06-18 03:20|| Front Page Top

6 The West obviously lacks any serious will to self defense and self preservation.

Or, some people, assume that Iran will nuke Israel - Israel will reply - and that way they're rid of two problems at once.

By "some people" I don't mean Trump - IMO, his goals are short term personal satisfaction.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 03:31||   2026-06-18 03:31|| Front Page Top

7 I'm sorta slow? I don't think you want to get to insults here! Every now and then you should learn to shut your cocksucker! You seem to think you are Alfie off Pinky Blinders. Go put your ,ask on and take you boosters and shut your ass up for once!
Posted by Chris 2026-06-18 04:23||   2026-06-18 04:23|| Front Page Top

8 Second childhood is an idiom used to describe a return to childlike behavior or a decline in mental abilities, often associated with advanced age or dementia.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 05:30||   2026-06-18 05:30|| Front Page Top

9 I'm with Grom here.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-06-18 06:05||   2026-06-18 06:05|| Front Page Top

10 ^😀
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 06:38||   2026-06-18 06:38|| Front Page Top

11 Antisemites, Iran shills, and isolationists celebrate Iran deal: 'Jews lose'
Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, Trita Parsi, and Hasan Piker among those to praise the Trump-Iran memorandum, portraying it as a victory for Iran and a setback for Israel.

When they're right, they're right!
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 06:39||   2026-06-18 06:39|| Front Page Top

12 No victory here, I'm afraid, but no defeat either.

Mike
Posted by MikeKozlowski 2026-06-18 08:01||   2026-06-18 08:01|| Front Page Top

13 I see the terms reading "at least" 300 billion. While I doubt Iran see's any of that it is odd in such ad meticulously worded document.
Posted by Dopey Photch2701 2026-06-18 08:36||   2026-06-18 08:36|| Front Page Top

14 I fully expect non-compliance by Iran, leading to Round Three
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 08:55||   2026-06-18 08:55|| Front Page Top

15 I fully expect non-compliance by Iran

Yeah, treaties are like Florida Traffic Laws by the Iranians. They're only 'suggestions' for day-to-day usage, unless you're the 'victim' and then the whinging begins.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2026-06-18 09:16||   2026-06-18 09:16|| Front Page Top

16 Without using nukes and without putting LOTS of boots on the ground in Iran, how do we "win" and in a time frame that is acceptable to the remarkably short attention span of the average American voter?
Do we risk losing control of the House & Senate over this?

We've killed layers of the IRGC leadership, that didn't work.
We've destroyed lots of military equipment, that didn't work either.
The best chance of an uprising disappeared when the IRGC murdered 30,000+ protesters
Posted by Chantry 2026-06-18 09:42||   2026-06-18 09:42|| Front Page Top

17 Excellent point at #16.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-06-18 09:48||   2026-06-18 09:48|| Front Page Top

18 
Islamic Iran to honor agreements with INFIDELS?

OH! That's right....
However, there are specific circumstances where deception is permitted, particularly for self-preservation or during conflict.
Conditions for Deception

Self-Preservation: Muslims may conceal their faith or identity to protect themselves from persecution or harm. This practice is known as taqiyya.

War Situations: Deception can be justified during warfare to protect the community or achieve strategic advantages.

But surely that's not the case here.
😏

Or at least not until they get that a $$$ Billion paycheck for waging war AGAIN.
Posted by NN2N1 2026-06-18 09:59||   2026-06-18 09:59|| Front Page Top

19 How you win without using nukes or troops is you start by destroying all modern infrastructure. Power, desalinization plants, water treatment plants, bridges, etc. Then you kill anything trying to enter the country. Any ship or boat, gone. Every factory, refinery, etc. It's f*ing brutal, but it'd end the country except for a few farmers.
Posted by Silentbrick 2026-06-18 10:53||   2026-06-18 10:53|| Front Page Top

20 Not politically acceptable anywhere and possibly the one thing that could get Trump impeached and removed from office.

Add to 16: How billions of dollars are we willing to spend on military attacks on Iran?

I truly hope there is an revolution in Iran where the IRGC and other anti-America factions die at the hands of the mob.
Posted by Chantry 2026-06-18 11:05||   2026-06-18 11:05|| Front Page Top

21 #20 The world is changing, buba.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 11:33||   2026-06-18 11:33|| Front Page Top

22 @21 Nothing constructive Grom?

Is Israel going to be happy, probably not, but I'm fairly certain Israel will be unhappy if the Democrats regain control of Congress.
Posted by Chantry 2026-06-18 11:55||   2026-06-18 11:55|| Front Page Top

23 ^Is there a difference?
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 11:58||   2026-06-18 11:58|| Front Page Top

24 ^^Upon reflection, there is a difference.
When Democrats doing dirty to Israel, Republicans object - if only because they hate Democrats.
When Republicans are doing dirty to Israel - like right now - Democrats do not object because they hate Israel more than they hate Republicans.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:05||   2026-06-18 12:05|| Front Page Top

25 
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:06||   2026-06-18 12:06|| Front Page Top

26 ^ If Trump had used 10 nukes on Iran, you'd whine that it should have been 15. Sometime, you should try not living down to your nature
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 12:09||   2026-06-18 12:09|| Front Page Top

27 
Posted by Chris 2026-06-18 12:13||   2026-06-18 12:13|| Front Page Top

28 Sure Francis. Now feel better about your Trump's behavior?
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:21||   2026-06-18 12:21|| Front Page Top

29 I'm good. We'll see.
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 12:26||   2026-06-18 12:26|| Front Page Top

30 Glad to hear it.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:34||   2026-06-18 12:34|| Front Page Top

31 We should go back to isolationism and see what your smug ass has to say after about 6 months. Same for you euro dipshit.
Posted by Chris 2026-06-18 12:39||   2026-06-18 12:39|| Front Page Top

32 ^No Imports?
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:45||   2026-06-18 12:45|| Front Page Top

33 I'm not materialistic, so everything I need is right here, I'm country boy, we're not like you. I can grow my own, hunt and have been poor , so I won't whine like a whore when I don't have certain luxuries.
Posted by Chris 2026-06-18 12:49||   2026-06-18 12:49|| Front Page Top

34 And you can post to Internet without Chines computer - bravo!
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 12:54||   2026-06-18 12:54|| Front Page Top

35 Israel is the only country in the world which has been under constant threat of annihilation since its foundation. It has managed quite well and will continue to do so.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-06-18 12:59||   2026-06-18 12:59|| Front Page Top

36 ^Thanks.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 13:10||   2026-06-18 13:10|| Front Page Top

37 I can't see the future. I don't know what the Mad Mullahs will do. Based on past behavior, I'm not terribly optimistic but let's give the deal maker a chance. If, after the 60 day period it becomes clear that Iranians will reneg on the deal, and judging Trump on past behavior, I predict that he will bomb the fuck out of them, restore the blockade and send the Marines to occupy Kharg Island.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-06-18 13:12||   2026-06-18 13:12|| Front Page Top

38 Chris, I realize you don’t like Grom, but Israel has been a far better ally to America than we deserve. America pretty much boycotted Israel until after they’d won the Six Day War in 1967, and since then American support has been unsteady and transactional at best, mostly involving holding Israel back from acting, depending who was in the White House. And now President Trump is insulting Bibi and Israel in front of the entire world, saying they should be grateful for the insults while they absorb attacks from Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran without responding — and his is the best position America has to offer at the moment: the Democrats and the crazier Republican-Conservatives both gleefully shout the same Nazi slogans.

I am praying hard this is just posturing for effect until both our military and the IDF are resupplied, and Iran does something egregious enough to discard the MOU in the next sixty days — the two of them have played that game before.

Israel supplies the backbone tech of the internet, both hardware and software, sophisticated medicines and medical technology, military and non-military intelligence, and military technology and technology improvements that make our stuff work or work better. They figured out how to make F-35s flyable, then gave that information to us.
Posted by trailing wife 2026-06-18 13:19||   2026-06-18 13:19|| Front Page Top

39 Paragraph one "and their allies..." I don't see Israel immediately / permanently terminating military action. FWIW I don't see the Houthis or Hezbollah doing so either. This is a futile exercise to get some of the barnacle encrusted tankers out of their anchorage so they can be put to use elsewhere. Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and others are already screwed in their ag harvests courtesy of fertilizer interruption. I'm simply hopeful that the temporary pause in hostilities will last long enough that farmers in the US and Canada have enough diesel to bring in the fall harvest. Selfish, yes? Better selfish than hungry
Posted by Dopey Photch2701 2026-06-18 13:29||   2026-06-18 13:29|| Front Page Top

40 I would assume that if Israel is expected to cease hostilities in Lebanon then Hezbollah is expected to do the same. If they don't, all bets are off.

I would give Trump credit though. He is trying to get between people who hate each other and want each other dead. That's a tough job. He is trying to prevent a nuclear war. None of his predecessors has even tried. As JD Vance just said, Isn't it worth trying?."

The trouble with Arabs and Iranians is that they are not very good at keeping their word. They have a tendency to let splinter groups and proxys like Hezbollah do their dirty work while they claim innocence. That, of course, is bullshit and Israel has a right to defend itself. But I'd hate for the deal to be broken due the actions of some hot headed Israeli. Give it 60 days to see what happens.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-06-18 13:35||   2026-06-18 13:35|| Front Page Top

41 We are back to 2016 axiom: Trust The Plan.

Posted by mossomo 2026-06-18 13:40||   2026-06-18 13:40|| Front Page Top

42 You’re right, mossomo.

An interesting, quick analysis:

Ted Cruz Wanted a Fight on Iran. Don Jr. Brought the Receipts.
Posted by trailing wife 2026-06-18 14:14||   2026-06-18 14:14|| Front Page Top

43 I don't recall seeing a post with more comments than this.
Posted by Chantry 2026-06-18 14:27||   2026-06-18 14:27|| Front Page Top

44 We've had more, especially during the height of COVID with our truculent "expert"
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 14:29||   2026-06-18 14:29|| Front Page Top

45 My intuitive sense, based on nothing but my own efforts to sense the parts of the story unseen by the public information sources, is that Trump was under enormous pressure from the Gulf States and assorted European Allies to stop the fighting before the target sets became basic infrastructure. The uprising inside Iran didn't happen as hope-for, and the suppression by the IRGC et al was crushing hope for it.

At the same time, the usage levels of ordnance, weapon systems, and sundry equipment was edging into the war stocks reserve very quickly, far out-stripping the replacement capacity of our defense industries.

So Trump was open to a pause, but only briefly. He was also keenly aware of the mid-term polling numbers, the intransigence of the Republican Senate leaders to guard the elections by the Voter Protection legislation, and the resultant catastrophic political risks of a democrat House and Senate, with possibly veto proof coalitions and even Senate willingness to support impeachment convictions. The lilliputian administrative nightmare that might produce could undo all the progress made nationally. So once the pause ripened slowly, and the never ending "negotiations" dragged on, restarting kinetic action was viewed as destructive to "diplomacy" and Trump was left with a weaker hand than intended, despite all his hyperbolic blather and promises of widespread success.

SO we get another drawn-out interregnum, with domestic commercial recovery and possibly some benefit to lessen the mid-term mess( the democrats are selling nothing but Orange Man Bad and socialist baloney after all with a collection of horrible candidates). Economic recovery will move the needles rightward rather quickly I suspect, lessening the problem, and a number of economic events, including a Cuban surprise and the 250th celebrations might even minimize the mid-term blowout. Once November passes, Iran might discover a renewed interest in the kaboom/regime change options by both the Us and Israel. So I am kind of seeing this as the best of a bad situation interim patch with lots of lipstick, and good intentions behind the facade?
Posted by NoMoreBS 2026-06-18 14:47||   2026-06-18 14:47|| Front Page Top

46 Excellent assessment NoMo.
Posted by Besoeker 2026-06-18 15:17||   2026-06-18 15:17|| Front Page Top

47 Incidentally, there are new developments.
(1) Trump stopped attacking Bibi. In fact, Trump says he'll probably support Netanyahu in November elections

(2) Whereas Vance attacks Ben Gvir and Smotrich.

I'm trying to decide if Trump trains his successor, or (hope) Trump had talks with influential Rs other then Cruz who indicated their displeasure.

By the way, Ben Gvir and Smotrich are a problem for me - I can't decide for whom to vote. One one hand, Smotrich accomplishes more than Ben Gvir. On the other hand, Ben Gvir is recognizably crazy. And, at this stage of the relations between Israel and the World, being considered crazy is (IMO) an advantage.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 15:31||   2026-06-18 15:31|| Front Page Top

48 Trump has been more heavily attacked as President than anyone in our lifetimes. Probably 10X. From phony impeachments and indictments to outright attempts on his life. Permanent leftist media TDS, Hollywood TDS, all the Demoncrats hating him and half the Republicans. But still he manages to win in the end. Time and time again. I’ve learned to give Trump some latitude, things will probably work out for us in the end.
Posted by Chesney Thoger2217 2026-06-18 16:28||   2026-06-18 16:28|| Front Page Top

49 ^What is important is not the win but that you do with it.
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 16:33||   2026-06-18 16:33|| Front Page Top

50 To me it is Metternichian if you include Turkey along with Iran and Israel.
Posted by Penguin of the Best Desert 2026-06-18 16:36||   2026-06-18 16:36|| Front Page Top

51 ^No comprende
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2026-06-18 17:51||   2026-06-18 17:51|| Front Page Top

52 ^ OR No care what you think at some point. Your expert status was burned in 2020. You're just an angry crank. You decide?
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 18:22||   2026-06-18 18:22|| Front Page Top

53 By the way, Ben Gvir and Smotrich are a problem for me - I can't decide for whom to vote. One one hand, Smotrich accomplishes more than Ben Gvir. On the other hand, Ben Gvir is recognizably crazy. And, at this stage of the relations between Israel and the World, being considered crazy is (IMO) an advantage.

I respect your local opinion on politics/things you are familiar with more than I. Why don't you have the humility to grant the same?
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 18:46||   2026-06-18 18:46|| Front Page Top

54 ^ I think Metternich played for the Chicago Bears. But I could be confusing him with Bronko Nagurski.

(1) Trump stopped attacking Bibi.

It looks like that gambit worked. I can just imagine the two of them on the phone laughing about it.
Posted by SteveS 2026-06-18 19:16||   2026-06-18 19:16|| Front Page Top

55 " Who's the Good Cop™/Bad Cop™ this week?"
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 19:27||   2026-06-18 19:27|| Front Page Top

56 I'm with NoMo @ 45

I'd add, also gives a chance to replace any systems which may have fallen into 'only on a rainy day' level of inventory, more mine finders and anti-drone systems perhaps even on commercial ships which frequent the area.
Posted by swksvolFF 2026-06-18 20:23||   2026-06-18 20:23|| Front Page Top

57 Nicely put #45 NoMoreBS
Posted by Frank G 2026-06-18 21:39||   2026-06-18 21:39|| Front Page Top

58 The 3 to 4 soviet era equivalents of a nuclear hand-grenade are absolutely of no use in a real war and would bring instant extermination to all IRGC ... just pointing it out.
Posted by 3dc 2026-06-18 23:23||   2026-06-18 23:23|| Front Page Top

19:25 Silentbrick
19:08 Frank G
18:42 NoMoreBS
18:28 Mercutio
18:10 Chantry
17:38 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
17:24 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
17:12 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
16:49 trailing wife
16:45 trailing wife
16:25 trailing wife
16:24 trailing wife
16:21 Gloluter Phavick7614
16:18 Gloluter Phavick7614
14:46 NN2N1
14:13 Rambler
14:09 trailing wife
13:26 Mercutio
12:59 Skidmark
12:39 Skidmark
12:34 mossomo
12:30 mossomo
12:15 MikeKozlowski
11:56 Procopius2k
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com