Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 09/24/2026 View Wed 09/23/2026 View Tue 09/22/2026 View Mon 09/21/2026 View Sun 09/20/2026 View Sat 09/19/2026 View Fri 09/18/2026
2026-06-04 Home Front: WoT
California tech CEO arrested for allegedly supplying equipment to Iranian nuclear programs: DOJ
[FoxNews] A California tech company CEO was arrested for allegedly supplying U.S. equipment to Iran's nuclear and military establishment.

Jamshid Ghomi, 63, a dual Iranian and U.S. citizen residing in Newport Coast, Calif., is charged with conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the U.S. Department of Justice announced Wednesday.

Ghomi allegedly procured "sophisticated U.S.-origin networking, security, and encryption equipment for Iranian customers --- including the Iranian regime’s nuclear and military establishment," according to a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.

“As alleged, Ghomi enriched himself by supplying U.S. technology to the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran and other sanctioned entities responsible for Iran’s nuclear program,” Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg said, per the statement.

“The National Security Division will hold accountable those who violate our laws to further Iran’s nuclear ambitions," he said

Ghomi moved over $15 million from Iran into his U.S. bank accounts and a separate escrow account, falsely reporting the money to the IRS as a foreign inheritance, according to the DOJ.

His federal tax returns reported almost no income with his highest reported income in any year being $20,684. He allegedly claimed the tax break intended for low- to moderate-income working individuals and families, in seven different tax years while reporting more than $1.7 million in mortgage interest and $1.25 million in state and local real-estate taxes on his federal income tax returns. # id) ?>
Posted by Skidmark 2026-06-04 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1899 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

1 Shoot that mf'er in the head also.
Posted by Chris 2026-06-04 02:38||   2026-06-04 02:38|| Front Page Top

2 Hang him.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2026-06-04 02:39||   2026-06-04 02:39|| Front Page Top

3 Making $20k a year and living in Commiefornia should be a Red Flag for criminal activity
Posted by Airandee 2026-06-04 06:41||   2026-06-04 06:41|| Front Page Top

4 Perhaps someone asked too many questions about the Ghomi network and timeline ?

Posted by Besoeker 2026-06-04 06:50||   2026-06-04 06:50|| Front Page Top

5 

Amazing what you can buy & sell on E-bay.
🤫
Posted by NN2N1 2026-06-04 07:47||   2026-06-04 07:47|| Front Page Top

6 He'll get more prison time for tax evasion than espionage.
Posted by EMS Artifact 2026-06-04 09:14||   2026-06-04 09:14|| Front Page Top

7 No mention of the FBI.

a dual Iranian and U.S. citizen

I would imagine there would be a 'watchlist'.
Posted by Skidmark 2026-06-04 10:39||   2026-06-04 10:39|| Front Page Top

8 So is it all of them or just a few? It's the same problem we had with the Japanese in WWII and the same problem we've been having with the Chinese. Can we trust a few of them, all of them or none of them? Hell, it's the same problem we have with the FBI and the CIA? Who can we trust?
Posted by Abu Uluque 2026-06-04 11:04||   2026-06-04 11:04|| Front Page Top

9 

Verify all others.
Posted by Skidmark 2026-06-04 11:18||   2026-06-04 11:18|| Front Page Top

10 
How about a simple update to granting of US CITIZENSHIP.

The person becoming a US Citizen must officially notify their former country, renouncing that citizenship before being granted the US status.
Posted by NN2N1 2026-06-04 13:35||   2026-06-04 13:35|| Front Page Top

11 The 1967 SCOTUS ruling allowing dual citizenship has always been a huge mistake. One cannot honestly hold more than one true allegiance at a time!

Wiki AI Cite: "Dual citizenship has been allowed in the United States since the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk on May 29, 1967. Prior to this decision, Americans who obtained foreign citizenship or voted in foreign elections could be stripped of their U.S. citizenship by the government.The transition to allowing dual nationality occurred in several key phases:Pre-1967 (Hostility): Historically, the U.S. government opposed dual citizenship. Through various acts—such as the Expatriation Act of 1907—the U.S. stipulated that acquiring foreign citizenship or swearing an oath of allegiance to a foreign state resulted in the automatic loss of American citizenship.The 1967 Supreme Court Ruling: In Afroyim v. Rusk (387 U.S. 253), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress has no constitutional authority to strip a citizen of their nationality without their voluntary consent. This decision effectively struck down most laws that had previously penalized Americans for acquiring dual citizenship.The 1980s and 1990s (Legal Consolidation): Following a series of subsequent rulings and State Department adjustments, the U.S. government officially accepted that an American's acquisition of a foreign citizenship does not automatically result in the loss of U.S. citizenship, provided the individual does not formally renounce their U.S. status. While dual citizenship is permitted today, the U.S. government does not actively encourage or officially endorse it due to the complex legal and tax obligations involved. ..."
Posted by NoMoreBS 2026-06-04 17:51||   2026-06-04 17:51|| Front Page Top

12 When one becomes a naturalized US citizen, one has to swear the following:
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

How does this allow someone to be a dual citizen? I can understand, though I do not agree with, a US citizen becoming a citizen of another country, without losing their US citizenship.
Posted by Rambler 2026-06-04 17:58||   2026-06-04 17:58|| Front Page Top

15:51 DarthVader
15:32 NoMoreBS
14:32 badanov
14:26 Silentbrick
14:10  chris
14:06 Skidmark
13:48 Bugs the Wicked6167
13:15 badanov
13:09 DarthVader
12:57 Grom the Reflective
12:06 Grom the Reflective
11:57 Bobby
11:55 Grom the Reflective
10:47 DarthVader
10:39 Silentbrick
10:14 Bobby
10:13 badanov
10:00 Snesing Schwarzeneggar8998
09:58 Besoeker
09:45 Bobby
09:34 Warthog
09:22 Besoeker
09:17 Mercutio
09:13 Glenmore
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com