Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 09/26/2026 View Fri 09/25/2026 View Thu 09/24/2026 View Wed 09/23/2026 View Tue 09/22/2026 View Mon 09/21/2026 View Sun 09/20/2026
2026-01-12 Home Front: Politix
Some US senators skeptical about military options for Iran
[IsraelTimes] Republican Rand Paul says bombing Iran won’t have intended effect; Democrat Mark Warner could rally the people of Iran against an outside enemy

Some US politicians in both major parties on Sunday questioned whether military action against Iran
...a theocratic Shiite state divided among the Medes, the Persians, and the (Arab) Elamites. Formerly a fairly civilized nation ruled by a Shah, it became a victim of Islamic revolution in 1979. The nation is today noted for spontaneously taking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militias to extend the regime's influence. The word Iran is a cognate form of Aryan. The abbreviation IRGC is the same idea as Stürmabteilung (or SA). The term Supreme Guide is a the modern version form of either Duce or Führer or maybe both. They hate Jews Zionists Jews. Their economy is based on the production of oil and vitriol...
is the best approach for the United States as Iranian authorities face growing turmoil.

US President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and whatever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th and 47th President of the United States...
in recent days has left open the possibility of American intervention in Iran, where the biggest anti-government protests in years have led to the Revolutionary Guards blaming unrest on holy warriors and vowing to safeguard the governing system.

But at least two US senators sounded notes of caution during interviews on TV networks’ Sunday morning programs.

"I don’t know that bombing Iran will have the effect that is intended," Republican Senator Rand Paul said on ABC News’ "This Week" show.
Senator Paul is libertarian, original TEA Party, a Constitutionalist. He’s thought his way to whatever he believes, whether or not I think he’s occasionally unrealistic.
Rather than undermining the regime, a military attack on Iran could rally the people against an outside enemy, Paul and Democratic Senator Mark Warner said.

Warner, appearing on "Fox News Sunday," warned that a military strike against Iran could risk uniting Iranians against the United States "in a way that the regime has not been able to."
If we hit military and government targets, the Iranians are hitting those already, so they’ll be pleased we bounced their rubble. Let’s make sure we don’t hit schools and hospitals, and we’ll be fine.
History shows the dangers of US intervention, said Warner, who argued that the US-backed 1953 overthrow of Iran’s government set in motion a chain of events that gradually led to the rise of the country’s Islamic regime in the late 1970s.

The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reported that US military and diplomatic officials will brief Trump on Tuesday about options for Iran, including cyberattacks and potential military action.

Iran has said it will target US military bases if the United States launches an attack. But Republican Senator Lindsey Graham
...soft-spoken senator from South Carolina, former best buddy of John Maverick McCain. Since McCain's demise, Graham has become more outspoken, more Republican and more of a supporter of President Trump. The speech he gave in support of Brett Kavanaugh was downright manly and really cheesed off the Dems...
, who has often touted a muscular approach to foreign policy, said Trump "needs to embolden the protesters and scare the hell out of the [Iranian] regime."

"If I were you, Mr. President, I would kill the leadership that are killing the people," Graham said on Fox News’ "Sunday Morning Futures" show. "You’ve got to end this."

Reza Pahlavi, the US-based son of the Iranian shah who was ousted in 1979, said on Sunday he is prepared to return to Iran to lead a shift to a democratic government.

"I’m already planning on that," Pahlavi said on "Sunday Morning Futures." "My job is to lead this transition to make sure that no stone is left unturned, that in full transparency, people have an opportunity to elect their leaders freely and to decide their own future."

# id) ?>
Posted by trailing wife 2026-01-12 2026-01-12 00:26|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [1858 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

1 "he is prepared to return to Iran to lead a shift to a democratic government."

With or without the SAVAK?
Posted by DooDahMan 2026-01-12 04:12||   2026-01-12 04:12|| Front Page Top

2 ...has the world been safer with or without?
Posted by Procopius2k 2026-01-12 06:08||   2026-01-12 06:08|| Front Page Top

3 Some US Senators: "Don't do anything, don't do anything! It might make someone somewhere hate us."

They already hate us, dufuss. We have an opportunity here to help a group of people discover a better life. We can do that, or we can ignore them. How they treat us for the next 50 years will be determined by OUR action/inaction in the next few weeks.

Trump hasn't cut the entrenched government flops nearly deep enough. He may have to go, like Emperor Hirohito said, "back to blank paper".
Posted by Old Patriot 2026-01-12 09:30||   2026-01-12 09:30|| Front Page Top

4 Neither concern is unwarranted.

Best option? No boots on the ground. Take out the government actors - Supreme Leader, Guardian Council, & Islamic Consultative Assembly.
If their judges are anything like ours - leave'm - they'll do more damage alive than dead.
Posted by Mercutio 2026-01-12 09:42||   2026-01-12 09:42|| Front Page Top

5 I agree though that bombing Iran will not solve the problem.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-01-12 09:42||   2026-01-12 09:42|| Front Page Top

6 bombing a few of the IRGC assets would be a good idea

it could be painted as a deterrent to IRGC

even better would be using drones to eliminate some regime big shots

the supreme leader is probably underground and a few bombs could knock out his ventilation but it would be best if Khomenei could personally be tried by a new govt
Posted by Lord Garth 2026-01-12 09:48||   2026-01-12 09:48|| Front Page Top

7 "it could be painted as a deterrent to IRGC"
It wouldn't. They have nothing to lose.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-01-12 09:52||   2026-01-12 09:52|| Front Page Top

8 Provide small arms and ammunition to the resistance. Let them sort it out.



Posted by Besoeker 2026-01-12 09:54||   2026-01-12 09:54|| Front Page Top

9 That's a different story, of course.
Posted by European Conservative 2026-01-12 09:58||   2026-01-12 09:58|| Front Page Top

10 Taking out the command and control assets would seem to be the first act.
Posted by Procopius2k 2026-01-12 10:42||   2026-01-12 10:42|| Front Page Top

11 re# 7 Or we could do like you Europeans and sit on our hands and do nothing but hold meetings continuously, then bitch and whine when they are still there. Seems like y'all have enough problems of your own to be giving out advice.
Posted by chris 2026-01-12 17:42||   2026-01-12 17:42|| Front Page Top

12 I don't think we need to entertain Europe's suggestions on how to handle matters such as this. Europe doesn't handle matters such as this--they just hold endless debates and at the end of the day cave to whichever dog is barking the loudest.
Posted by Crusader 2026-01-12 21:32||   2026-01-12 21:32|| Front Page Top

13 Or whomever will push their own agenda farther until there aiped out by their "allies".
Posted by chris 2026-01-12 22:13||   2026-01-12 22:13|| Front Page Top

Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com