|
2025-10-22 Home Front: Politix
|
|
BREAKING: Senators Warnock, Ossoff Implicated In Largest Straw Donor Campaign Finance Fraud Ever Documented
|
 | A project of James O’Keefe’s OMG digging into Act Blue’s shenanigans. |
[GeorgiaRecord] Georgia Senators Warnock and Ossoff have been implicated in receiving large numbers of contributions from this donor. There will be more to come on this shortly.
⚠️ NATIONAL SECURITY EMERGENCY ⚠️
101,067 fraudulent contributions. $605,431 laundered. 16 years of continuous crime.
During COVID-19, while isolated and vulnerable, this elderly woman allegedly made
78.8 political donations EVERY SINGLE DAY
One donation every 18 minutes, 24/7, for an entire year.
This is MATHEMATICAL PROOF of the largest campaign finance
fraud operation ever documented in American history.
If they did this to ONE elderly woman, how many THOUSANDS of others?
This demands IMMEDIATE federal investigation by DOJ, FBI, FEC.
IS THIS SCHEME A TAXABLE EVENT FOR SONIA?
As a 77-80-year-old retiree listed as “NOT EMPLOYED,” Sonia’s situation suggests she’s likely on a fixed income (e.g., Social Security, pensions). If contributions were made in her name without her knowledge via a fraudulently created or compromised asset account, here’s how tax implications could arise:
| Details at the link, followed by details a out the tax implications for the funding source that flowed through her account |
DATA CONTEXT AND SPECIFICS
The FEC data shows:
- 2021 Peak: 28,769 contributions ($128,659) – likely required sustained funding into an account, potentially triggering 1099s or CTRs if not carefully structured.
- Micro-Transactions: 78% ≤$5, suggesting deliberate structuring to avoid bank/IRS flags, but aggregate deposits (e.g., $108,352 in 2020) could still trigger SARs.
- ActBlue Dominance: 82%+ to Committee C00401224 (ActBlue), processed via automated systems, implying a linked account (bank/card) in Sonia’s name.
CONCLUSION
Yes, the smurfing scheme would likely create taxable events:
- For Sonia: Deposits into a fraudulent account in her name could be misclassified as income, leading to tax liabilities, audits, or penalties she’s ill-equipped to handle, exacerbating the elder abuse. Proving identity theft to the IRS would be her only recourse, a daunting task for a retiree.
- For Bad Actors: Funding the account risks gift tax, tax evasion, or structuring charges, especially if illicit or unreported funds were used. The scale ($605,431) and duration (16 years) make IRS and DOJ scrutiny likely if traced.
This adds another layer of criminality, tax fraud; on top of campaign finance violations, identity theft, and elder abuse.
| Watch the OMG video on Rumble here. |
# id) ?>
|
Posted by NN2N1 2025-10-22 00:00||
E-Mail||
Front Page|| [1788 views ]
Top
File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life, & Kleptocrats
|
|
Posted by DarthVader 2025-10-22 00:11||
2025-10-22 00:11||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Mercutio 2025-10-22 09:06||
2025-10-22 09:06||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by swksvolFF 2025-10-22 13:30||
2025-10-22 13:30||
Front Page
Top
|
|
03:43 trailing wife
00:29 Clyde Thaviling6482
00:14 Besoeker
00:13 Skidmark
Merry-Go-Blog
|
