Article

2025-07-19 Government Corruption

JP Morgan Paid $290m To Epstein Victims - For Nothing?

[X]

🇺🇸 JP MORGAN PAID $290M TO EPSTEIN VICTIMS - FOR NOTHING?

The bank settled a class-action suit accusing it of facilitating Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.

Big number for a hoax, right?

And if there were victims… there were abusers.
You don’t settle for $290 million… https://t.co/5BuWg4AZtB pic.twitter.com/iprXF01XpN
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) July 18, 2025

…$290 million unless there’s something to settle.

Victims were real. So were the crimes.

Which means someone - likely many someones - committed them.

Funny (crazy) how the money moved fast... but the client list still can’t.

Source:
@TRHLofficial
,
@Chesschick01
, Reuters

Posted by Fred 2025-07-19 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| ||Comments [64 views ] Top

#1 Buying silence can be very expensive.

Posted by Besoeker 2025-07-19 03:12|| 2025-07-19 03:12|| Front Page || Comments Top

#2 I disagree with Trump about this being relevant. The rich, the celebrities and the royals don’t get to prostitute our kids and get away with it because their names aren’t Jesus or Manuel. Sure this happened awhile ago, but anyone who believes that these crimes were isolated incidents for these people haven’t studied the behavior of Al Gore since he lost the 2000 election. These people could have gone to Cannes or Rio, but they went to Epstein Island knowing exactly what was being proffered by Satanic Mr Rourke. If Epstein was on the payroll of the US taxpayer, that’s revenant too because that implicates me and I don’t like that.

Posted by Super Hose 2025-07-19 07:12|| 2025-07-19 07:12|| Front Page || Comments Top

#3 I don't think anyone believes this is all about because nothing happened; as I posited yesterday if the evidence is corrupted for wiped with a cloth, wouldn't making the accusation, like the WSJ did, without a proper case open one to a defamation lawsuit?

Let me ask another question - can one open the files of the grand jury part of a case in which the proper case portion has had a non-disclosure settlement?

Posted by swksvolFF 2025-07-19 10:26|| 2025-07-19 10:26|| Front Page || Comments Top

10:53 Elmerert Hupens2660
10:42 Skidmark
10:40 Procopius2k
10:30 Skidmark
10:26 swksvolFF
10:25 Procopius2k
10:23 Procopius2k
10:19 Procopius2k
10:17 swksvolFF
10:16 Procopius2k
10:15 swksvolFF
10:15 Grom the Affective
10:11 Procopius2k
10:08 Grom the Affective
10:06 Procopius2k
10:03 Skidmark
09:56 Grom the Affective
09:53 Skidmark
09:48 Skidmark
09:13 European Conservative
09:10 alanc
08:45 Mercutio
08:38 Mercutio
08:24 Besoeker
Merry-Go-Blog