Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/28/2025 View Fri 06/27/2025 View Thu 06/26/2025 View Wed 06/25/2025 View Tue 06/24/2025 View Mon 06/23/2025 View Sun 06/22/2025
1
2025-06-28 Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court Nukes Nationwide Injunctions Against Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-06-28 00:54|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [280 views ]  Top

#1 I was pretty sue it was gong to be a great year, but it just keeps getting better!



Posted by Oregon Dave 2025-06-28 01:37||   2025-06-28 01:37|| Front Page Top

#2 The Federalist - Justice Barrett Takes A Flamethrower To KBJ’s Reality-Challenged Dissent In Birthright Citizenship Case
Posted by Besoeker 2025-06-28 05:05||   2025-06-28 05:05|| Front Page Top

#3 Don Surber:
ITEM 2: Chief Justice John Roberts finally let a female justice—ACB—write a major decision. It immediately turned into a catfight, “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

KBJ replied, “This is why no one sits with you at lunch.”

ACB responded, “This is why Roberts makes you write your dissents in crayon.”

ITEM 3: Just to be clear, ACB wrote it but 5 colleagues kept it in. The new kid just isn’t fitting in.

As for the decision, it stayed the execution of most injunctions issued by lowly district judges who have a superiority complex that makes surgeons roll their eyes.
Posted by Frank G 2025-06-28 07:42||   2025-06-28 07:42|| Front Page Top

#4 Five US Supreme Court justices have stooped to doing what the US Congress is too inert to bother with.
Posted by Snakes Thrumble3930 2025-06-28 08:32||   2025-06-28 08:32|| Front Page Top

#5 Oops I meant to write "6" instead of "5"
Posted by Snakes Thrumble3930 2025-06-28 08:32||   2025-06-28 08:32|| Front Page Top

#6 Not only BRC... but also Opt-out-of-LGBti&etc bilge!
Not a bad way to wrap up Pride Month (what ever there hell THAT is) 🤗
Posted by hyper 2025-06-28 09:10||   2025-06-28 09:10|| Front Page Top

#7 Not a bad way to wrap up Pride Month

Pride comes before a fall
Posted by Skidmark 2025-06-28 10:26||   2025-06-28 10:26|| Front Page Top

#8 Brown's opinion is just appalling. She's basically saying that because DJT is "lawless" any judge anywhere can issue an injunction against his "lawless" conduct. So if Judge Boasberg is sitting in his pajamas reading the Sunday NYT and sees something that offends his sensibilities, he doesn't have to wait for anyone to file suit -- he can just fire off an injunction. Who needs an adversary system?
Posted by Matt 2025-06-28 11:03||   2025-06-28 11:03|| Front Page Top

#9 ^Ideology is a mind killer.
Posted by Grom the Affective 2025-06-28 11:40||   2025-06-28 11:40|| Front Page Top

#10 The federal judges will all simultaneously adopt a new tactic communicated to them ex parte. This insurrection is not grass roots.
Posted by Super Hose 2025-06-28 11:53||   2025-06-28 11:53|| Front Page Top

#11 Breitbart Business Digest: The Supreme Court Just Torpedoed the Legal War on Tariffs
Posted by Skidmark 2025-06-28 11:55||   2025-06-28 11:55|| Front Page Top

#12 In 2022 Justice Kagan said "“This can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stuck for the years that it takes to go through a normal process" My, how she's changed.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2025-06-28 12:51||   2025-06-28 12:51|| Front Page Top

#13 She's basically saying that because DJT is "lawless" any judge anywhere can issue an injunction against his "lawless" conduct.

Lady if they were lawless you would never see the light of day again.
Posted by DarthVader 2025-06-28 15:00||   2025-06-28 15:00|| Front Page Top

#14 Sounds like the new strategy will be to formulate a really Brad class for a class action suit.
Posted by Super Hose 2025-06-28 18:14||   2025-06-28 18:14|| Front Page Top

#15 In the midst of this banter and court findings, our SC is cleaning up the seams cut into our constitution by the left. Our constitution will be stronger because of Trump and what he is doing. We will get to live a clearer definition of our republic for decades thanks to him.
Posted by 49 Pan 2025-06-28 19:11||   2025-06-28 19:11|| Front Page Top

#16 Well said, 49 Pan.
Posted by trailing wife 2025-06-28 20:48||   2025-06-28 20:48|| Front Page Top

#17 14^
or a flurry of basically identical cases in multiple district courts
Posted by Lord Garth 2025-06-28 22:00||   2025-06-28 22:00|| Front Page Top

#18 They’re stretching like Gumby to continue the Dem political agenda. Chutkan has usurped another court’s prerogative entirely to make sure that Stacy Abrams gets paid. They are operatives wearing a skin suit of the judiciary.
Posted by Super Hose 2025-06-28 22:43||   2025-06-28 22:43|| Front Page Top

23:01 Super Hose
22:53 trailing wife
22:51 Super Hose
22:43 Super Hose
22:03 Canuckistan sniper
22:00 Lord Garth
21:52 Ebbuger Whuque4103
21:49 Lord Garth
20:56 SteveS
20:48 trailing wife
20:45 Frank G
20:05 Woodrow
19:54 ed in texas
19:11 49 Pan
18:14 Super Hose
17:26 Thor tse Tung7432
17:14 Alpha2c
17:09 Alpha2c
17:02 trailing wife
16:31 ed in texas
15:21 Secret Master
15:00 DarthVader
14:58 DarthVader
14:56 Grom the Affective
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com