Article

2011-05-14 Home Front: WoT

US charges six with aiding Pakistani Taliban

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2011-05-14 14:25|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [11139 views ] Top

#1 The absurd Obamaholic (whistling past the graveyard) passage:

The Justice Department, clearly wary of the sensitivities of linking religious figures to terror groups, repeatedly made clear in its statement that the indictment does not charge or accuse the mosques of wrongdoing, and that the defendants have been charged based on their role in providing "material support to terrorism," and not on their religious beliefs or teachings.

Posted by Jack Salami 2011-05-14 15:08|| 2011-05-14 15:08|| Front Page Top

#2 conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization, specifically, the Pakistani Taliban

Wonder what prompted this? I thought the Taliban wasn't listed as a terrorist org, choosing to "diplomatically" address them, prompting the ridiculous ROE in Afghanistan

Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2011-05-14 15:16|| 2011-05-14 15:16|| Front Page Top

#3 Put a warhead on all of their frickin warheads. My tolerance level these cockroaches is subzero.

Posted by anymouse 2011-05-14 17:12|| 2011-05-14 17:12|| Front Page Top

#4 anonymous- exactly what I've said for some time...why allow this Crapistan country rope a dope us for decades to come?

Posted by Jack Salami 2011-05-14 19:29|| 2011-05-14 19:29|| Front Page Top

#5 well. As usual I did nae read the article, just add another billyion to that magic number of 6 and you be getting the picture. Kill them all, dead, gone, space-dust, fertiliser.

Posted by Rhodesiafever 2011-05-14 19:37|| 2011-05-14 19:37|| Front Page Top

#6 Jack Salami: Because as long as we do, they won't give the terrorists nukes. Oh sure, they give them material support, arms, logistics, but not freagin NUCLEAR WEAPONS. And I mean anything nuclear, since I have doubts they even have more than a handful of properly-maintained nukes.

Posted by Charles 2011-05-14 19:43|| 2011-05-14 19:43|| Front Page Top

#7 Charles: More likely they turn into a wacky Islamist mullah-esque, aggressive, country and push us and India around with nuclear ace card.

Posted by Jack Salami 2011-05-14 19:58|| 2011-05-14 19:58|| Front Page Top

23:52 CrazyFool
23:32 Whiskey Mike
23:22 rammer
23:18 rammer
23:11 European Conservative
22:49 Butch Pherenter1486
22:33 trailing wife
22:31 Zebulon Thranter9685
22:25 Zhang Fei
22:04 European Conservative
21:24 Shieldwolf
21:19 Shieldwolf
21:02 Nimble Spemble
20:37 aidincguy
20:31 Pappy
20:24 anon1
20:15 anon1
19:58 Jack Salami
19:56 Deacon Blues
19:53 Charles
19:43 Charles
19:37 Rhodesiafever
19:29 Jack Salami
18:56 JohnQC
Merry-Go-Blog