Article

2009-06-10 China-Japan-Koreas

NKorea to use nukes in ŽŽmerciless offensiveŽŽ

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2009-06-10 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 If you are gonna go, go strong! Of course, this would reduce North Korea to a historical footnote. Which really isn't such a bad thing, is it?

Posted by SteveS 2009-06-10 01:13|| 2009-06-10 01:13|| Front Page Top

#2 "an advanced pre emptive strike of its own" a strike after a pre emptive strike isn't pre emptive is it?

Posted by funky skunk 2009-06-10 11:04|| 2009-06-10 11:04|| Front Page Top

#3 it's a counter-threat, "You try to attack and release our prissoners*Hostages) and we then have a RIGHT to blast you"

Or simply put, "No "Hostage Rescue" OR ELSE.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2009-06-10 11:41|| 2009-06-10 11:41|| Front Page Top

#4 It's the mad dog defence. Problem is inthe west we shootmad dogs

Posted by Rjschwarz 2009-06-10 11:51|| 2009-06-10 11:51|| Front Page Top

#5 no problem is we don't shoot enough of them though. Bring back legal assasinations and put the shit on the news I would bet alot of the badass wannabes would shut up

Posted by funky skunk 2009-06-10 14:00|| 2009-06-10 14:00|| Front Page Top

#6 The left went ballistic when G.W. Bush termed North Korea, Iran and Iraq the "Axis of Evil." Someone is the current administration will most likely coin some euphemism to call the North Koreans so as not to "insult" them. "Axis of man-made disasters?"

Posted by JohnQC 2009-06-10 18:30|| 2009-06-10 18:30|| Front Page Top

#7 The communist country would answer any pre-emptive strike with "an advanced pre-emptive strike" of its own, the cabinet newspaper Minju Joson said.

I'll call your "advanced pre-emptive strike" and raise you three hair-raising Total Conflict Precursor Strikes (TCPS).

Posted by Besoeker 2009-06-10 19:16|| 2009-06-10 19:16|| Front Page Top

#8 I agree 100% with legal assasinations. Put our political leadership at risk as well as theirs. Since we have an orderly system of replacement we will come out ahead in any such tit for tat, we also spare their citizens and infrastructure an actual war and lastly we don't need to occupy.

Posted by rjschwarz 2009-06-10 21:38|| 2009-06-10 21:38|| Front Page Top

#9 WORLD MIL FORUM > IIUC CHINA DOES NOT WANT NORTH KOREA TO HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, BUT NEITHER DOES CHINA DESIRE FOR THE US-ALLIES TO INTERCEPT NORTH KOREA'S MISSLES.

* SAME > INDIA IS NOT WORRIED ABOUT CHINA DEV A STRATEGIC NAVAL BASE AT HAINAN: INDIA IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE NUMBER OF MISSLE AND ATTCK SUBMARINES BASED THERE.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2009-06-10 22:17|| 2009-06-10 22:17|| Front Page Top

23:55 Truth Yesss
23:48 Iblis
23:47 Atomic Conspiracy
23:40 trailing wife
23:05 trailing wife
23:00 Atomic Conspiracy
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:55 Atomic Conspiracy
22:46 JosephMendiola
22:45 trailing wife
22:39 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:26 JosephMendiola
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:22 Truth Yesss
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:13 Truth Yesss
22:11 Frank G
22:10 Atomic Conspiracy
22:07 DarthVader
22:03 Truth Yessss!
22:01 Rambler in Virginia
21:57 rjschwarz
Merry-Go-Blog