Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Commander of the 155th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade Sergei Ilyin died in the SVO zone |
2025-07-12 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] The commander of the 155th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces, Sergei Ilyin, died in the zone of a special military operation. This was reported on July 11 by the RT television channel. ![]() Ilyin was born in the village of Musirmy in the Chuvash District. He served in the Marine Corps for over 20 years, rising from junior commander to colonel. "Sergey Yuryevich carried out combat missions with honor and courage, demonstrating exceptional bravery and heroism. He performed an immortal feat, giving his life for our Motherland. Giving one's life for one's country is the highest patriotic act that will forever remain in people's memory. His bravery and selflessness serve as an example for future generations," the TV channel quotes the message from the administration of the Urmarsky Municipal District of Chuvashia, which was later deleted. The 155th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade is a tactical unit of the Pacific Fleet's naval infantry. The unit is stationed in Vladivostok and in the village of Slavyanka in Primorsky Krai. The brigade is currently named after Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Navy Mikhail Gudkov. As previously reported by the Regnum news agency, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Navy Mikhail Gudkov died in the Kursk region on July 2. His comrade Nariman Shikhaliev died along with the commander. Russian President Vladimir Putin awarded Gudkov the Gold Star medal posthumously. The second special distinction was awarded to Major General Gudkov for courage and heroism displayed during a special military operation. He was awarded the title Hero of Russia in October 2023 for courage, heroism and skillful command of subordinate units. According to another decree of the president, the 155th separate guards Kursk orders of Zhukov and Suvorov marine brigade was awarded the honorary title “named after twice Hero of the Russian Federation Major General M. E. Gudkov.” |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Residents of 325 settlements are being evacuated from the Kharkiv region |
2025-07-11 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] Residents are being evacuated from 325 settlements in the Kharkiv region. This was announced on July 10 by the head of the regional military administration Oleg Sinegubov on the air of the Ukrainian telethon. ![]() "There are 325 settlements under evacuation status. Some of them are already practically empty of population, we have evacuated everyone... Mandatory evacuation from the Shevchenko community continues," he wrote. Sinegubov added that the Kupyansk direction remains the most difficult for the region, and it is necessary to increase the pace of evacuation there. According to him, if the pace is unsatisfactory, people will have to be forcibly evacuated. Earlier, Regnum news agency reported that the Ukrainian authorities of Zaporizhia, temporarily occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, may declare a forced evacuation of the population. In early June, forced evacuation was declared in seven settlements in the Kharkiv region. Local authorities specified that this concerns residents of the villages of Baranovka, Berezovka, Novonikolayevka, Podobovka, Staroverovka, Duvanka and Fedorovka. Also in early June, the Dnipropetrovsk region authorities decided to expand the forced evacuation zone by adding 14 settlements. The forced evacuation should be in effect in the region for two months. Russian President Vladimir Putin noted on June 20 that Russian troops are advancing daily along the entire line of contact. They are expanding their area of operations to create a border security zone, which is exacerbating the problems of Ukrainian troops, who are experiencing a shortage of personnel. More from regnum.ru TASS: Ukraine burns bodies of Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers transferred to it — 1232nd day of SVO The bodies of soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU), handed over by the Russian side as a gesture of goodwill following the Istanbul agreements, are being burned so as not to pay compensation to their relatives. The corresponding video footage, filmed by a CCTV camera, presumably from a crematorium in the Ternopil region, was published on July 10 by TASS. It shows the moment when three men in protective suits and masks wheel a body in a white bag on a gurney and place it in an oven through a door. The new, 1232nd day of the SVO was marked by discussion of this news, among other things. Agreements on the transfer of bodies and the exchange of prisoners were reached at the talks between the Russian Federation and Ukraine in Istanbul on June 2. The first 1,212 dead Ukrainian soldiers were delivered to the designated exchange site on June 6, but Kiev postponed their acceptance without explanation. Refrigerated trucks with frozen corpses, the abandoned "cargo 200," stood for several days on the border with Ukraine. On June 9, presidential aide and head of the Russian delegation at the negotiations with Ukraine, Vladimir Medinsky, pointed out, in particular, that it is difficult for Kiev to acknowledge large losses, and the money for compensation to the families of the dead soldiers has probably already been spent. Meanwhile, military correspondent Alexander Kots calculated Ukraine's approximate expenses due to the bodies of soldiers handed over by Russia. According to him, based on the fact that for each dead Ukrainian soldier, relatives were promised 30 million rubles, Kiev will be forced to pay the families of the dead 180 billion rubles. |
Link |
Britain |
Britain to supply 5,000 air defense missiles to Ukraine |
2025-07-11 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] The UK will supply Ukraine with 5,000 air defense missiles manufactured at the Thales defense plant in Belfast. This was announced by the British government on July 10. "The deal will see the delivery of more than 5,000 air defence missiles from the UK-based Thales plant, which will not only significantly enhance the UK's defence capability but will also enable Ukraine to continue the fight," the statement said. Ukraine is running out of time... The document also notes that the deliveries will be made within the framework of a loan agreement, which the parties are to sign at a conference on the restoration of Ukraine, which will be held in Rome on July 10 and 11. Britain will provide a £2.5 billion loan with a 19-year repayment period for the delivery of missiles. Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced the resumption of arms supplies to Ukraine. According to the American leader, the Kiev regime must be able to "defend itself", and Ukrainian troops are currently receiving very strong blows. Russia has repeatedly pointed out that arms supplies to Ukraine will not change the course of the special operation. Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the West's military aid to the Kiev regime proves NATO's involvement in the conflict. On July 8, Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov noted that pumping weapons into the Kiev regime is not in line with attempts to promote a peaceful settlement. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
'America's Fall from Europe': How Russia Has Saved the US More Than Once |
2025-07-09 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Mikhail Kucherov [REGNUM] Russia may revise the list of unfriendly countries, which currently includes the United States. In fact, this list is not a dogma, Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov noted on June 8, speaking about the possibility of restarting contacts between Moscow and Washington. Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump stated in a telephone conversation on July 3 that relations between our country and the United States have deep historical roots. ![]() Moreover, as Putin noted both in his conversation with Trump and in a recent interview, Russia played a decisive role in the very emergence of the United States. Indeed, when a new state appeared on the map in 1776 – the United States of America – it was a surprise for the entire world. But not for our country. Even before the start of the War of Independence, in the autumn of 1774, the Russian envoy to London, Alexei Musin-Pushkin, reported to St. Petersburg about the uprising being prepared in England’s 13 North American colonies. The diplomat called for the brewing conflict to be treated as “worthy of any serious note.” Musin-Pushkin explained to Catherine's nobles: the war between Britain and the American colonists "seems all the more inevitable because they (the Americans) have been driven... to extremes." Therefore, they can no longer obey English "legislations" and will resist them "as burdensome and restrictive of their natural and legal rights." Informed sources overseas told our diplomat that "the people there, leaving their usual trades, voluntarily engage in military exercises. This spirit of hostility equally infects all ranks and titles." When on April 19, 1775, Massachusetts militia defeated Colonel Francis Smith's detachment at Lexington, London realized that it was impossible to suppress the separatist movement by police measures. Especially since after the first successes of George Washington's army, the war between the self-proclaimed USA and Britain was closely watched by the main rivals of the English - the French (since 1778, Louis XVI officially sanctioned the entry of the kingdom into the war). That is why, at the very beginning of the uprising in the colonies, the English King George III desperately sought allies. Turning his gaze to the Russian crown, the British monarch asked Catherine II to send an auxiliary corps of 20 thousand people to America. Not long ago, during the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774 and the Russian fleet's campaign from the Baltic to the Mediterranean, England essentially helped Russia. The Royal Navy did not allow a French squadron into the Mediterranean, ready to help the Turks (France's long-standing partners). Of course, this was not about Albion's altruism, but about the enmity between the English and the French, but, acting in their own interests, the British objectively played in our favor. And now they were waiting for reciprocal favors. Without waiting for Catherine's response, the English prepared the text of the corresponding agreement. The response from St. Petersburg was negative, although diplomatic - with a sober-sounding thesis that the Russian Empire needed peace. "With all my heart I wish that my English friends would get along with their colonies... But so many of my predictions have come true that I fear that in my lifetime we will have to see America break away from Europe," the empress prophetically noted. Russia also acted in its own interests. Britain not only tried to defeat the separatists on the battlefield, but also strangled the rebellious colonies with a naval blockade, cutting off the flow of goods to America. The Russian Empire (guided by the principle of free trade, which, we note, was bequeathed by the British economist Adam Smith ) did not want to participate in the blockade. That is why in 1780 St. Petersburg adopted a declaration of armed neutrality. Our country warned the great powers and England first and foremost that it would defend its right to free trade. It is curious that it was after this declaration that France openly supported the American colonists, and at the same time Holland, England's long-time rival at sea, joined in supporting the rebels. The rebels could not help but appreciate Russia's involvement in their fate. Washington declared that Catherine's decision "bears the imprint of respect for the rights of humanity." As we see, even then the US began to appeal to human rights when it was advantageous for them - and then our country, which in Europe was accustomed to revile for "Asian despotism," suddenly turned out to be their stronghold. The US Continental Congress, after reviewing the document, adopted a separate resolution, fully approving the Russian declaration and notifying the St. Petersburg envoy to The Hague, Dmitry Golitsyn, in writing; according to many historians, this is the first diplomatic document exchanged between the countries. The American Revolution, as we know, resulted in the Treaty of Paris in 1784 (initiated by Louis XVI, who, by historical irony, soon fell victim to the revolution in his own country). The mistress of the seas, England, recognized 13 of its former overseas possessions as sovereign and independent states and renounced its claims to govern them. Such a "happy ending" would not have happened if not for the intransigence of Catherine the Great. It is understandable why, on the sidelines of the Peace of Paris, Benjamin Franklin handed over to the Russian envoy Ivan Baryatinsky “the book-constitution of the United American Provinces and a medal struck for their independence” for subsequent sending to the empress. So the two Founding Fathers that Americans should know at least from their images on dollar bills – Washington and Franklin – were also the founders of Russian-American contacts at the highest level. CALIFORNIA BALLS The Americans repaid Russia with approximately the same kind of benevolent neutrality during the Crimean War, sending 30 surgeons and 15 engineers to the tsarist army units besieged by Anglo-French troops, who were engaged in laying railway tracks. Petersburg went further at this stage of Russian-American interaction: formally maintaining neutrality, several years later it sent two naval squadrons to America, which was engulfed in civil war, to help the northerners. The St. Andrew's flag off the coast of New York and California became a symbol of protection from a possible attack by the French and British fleets for the local population. Alexey Bogolyubov. Russian squadron on the way to America. 1880s According to eyewitnesses, the Russian sailors were surrounded by the attention of Secretary of State William Seward (the same one who organized the deal to purchase Alaska), congressmen and members of their families: "Your Excellency, of course, already knows from the newspapers with what sympathy we have been received here. On the 5th, the city of San Francisco gave a ball as a sign of general favor to the sovereign and Russia, which in the annals of San Francisco will certainly remain as the most magnificent on the shores of the Pacific Ocean," wrote Rear Admiral Andrei Popov in 1863 to the naval minister of the Russian Empire, Nikolai Krabbe. Recordings of speeches from farewell banquets have survived, where Americans highly praised the “ sense of international brotherhood ” and “ moral assistance ” brought by the Russians. According to newspaper headlines of the time, many parents in the United States began to name their children Ivan or simply Russian. There are also known cases of direct participation of Russians in military actions. Colonel Ivan Turchaninov, without sanctions from the command, joined the northerners and, having distinguished himself in the battles of Chickamauga and Chattanooga, not only became John Turchin, but also received the stars of a brigadier general. John Turchin in the uniform of the 19th Illinois Regiment commander. Abraham Lincoln, whose authority grew thanks to the presence of Russian squadrons, did not hesitate to call Russia “ despotism in its purest form,” but he did not remain in debt - he saved Turchaninov, who was brought to trial during intrigues, by raising him to the coveted rank: in the USA, army arbitration had no jurisdiction over generals, which allowed the military leader to avoid going to jail. True, later the soldier, considered a deserter in his homeland, began to criticize the American socio-political order: “My disappointment is complete; I do not see any real freedom here. <…> This republic is a paradise for the rich; they are truly independent here; the most terrible crimes and the blackest intrigues are repaid with money. <…> As for me personally, I thank America for one thing: it helped me to kill outright the lordly prejudices and brought me down to the level of an ordinary mortal <…> no work is terrible for me.” "OBLIGATED FOR HELP" Historical sources preserve the memory of years of friendship, pragmatic on the political level and quite sincere on the human level. Mark Twain, who visited Crimea with a group of his compatriots, was fortunate to have an audience with Alexander II, whom he considered more majestic than Napoleon and the Turkish Sultan. The writer openly admitted that America owed much to Russia for its help during the "great disasters." It is unknown how long it will take for a constructive seed to sprout in the current dialogue between Moscow and the current American administration. But it is obvious that Russia, as it did 150 years ago, wants to act in accordance with the principles of “preserving the American Union as an undivided nation” voiced by the outstanding Alexander Gorchakov. These two historical episodes became prototypes of further rapprochement in relations between the USA and Russia. One can recall the mediating role of Theodore Roosevelt in stopping the Russo-Japanese War - essentially inspired by Britain to the common disadvantage of Russia and the USA. The two powers were allies in World War I. Incidentally, a curious piece of evidence of this has been preserved in St. Petersburg: during the Great War, an image of the US coat of arms, a bald eagle with a star-spangled shield, was installed on the roof of the representative office of the American firm Singer (which almost everyone considered a German firm because of the owners' surname). Thus, Singer's house on Nevsky avoided German pogroms. Finally, the most recent rapprochement that Donald Trump also recalls is the joint fight against Nazism and Japanese militarism in World War II. But the American leader, who claims that it was the United States that was the main victor over Hitler, would do well to remember how our country saved the United States – in the 1770s, the 1860s, and the 1940s. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
CIA review suggests Brennan misled Congress on Steele Dossier and 2016 intel, lawmakers want probe |
2025-07-08 |
[JustTheNews] An anal probe, with a cactus, please A new report by the CIA revealed new details about infirmities and failures with the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment of Russian influence in the 2016 election, criticizing now-former CIA Director John Brennan for his actions and raising the possibility he may have misled Congress. Brennan is currently a Senior National Security Analyst for NBC. Last week, CIA Director John Ratcliffe released a "lessons learned" review of the December 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). That review sharply criticized Brennan for allegedly joining with anti-Trump forces in the FBI, pushing to include British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s baseless anti-Trump dossier in the assessment. In the review, the CIA’s new review also critiqued the “high confidence” assessment by the FBI and the CIA that Russian leader Vladimir Putin had “aspired” to help President Donald Trump win in 2016. Now-former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., spoke on the John Solomon Reports podcast for Just the News on Monday, arguing that the Justice Department should investigate Brennan over his denials about pushing to include the Steele dossier in the ICA. The former congressman said that “there’s a pretty clear shot at Brennan for a review of lying to Congress.” Brennan was not one of the recipients of then-President Biden's 4,245 pardons or clemency granted, and lying to Congress can be a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which forbids making false statements to the federal government, including Congress. Unlike perjury, it is not limited to statements made under oath, but the statement must be "materially false" and made knowingly and willfully. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Putin appoints Andrey Nikitin as Russia's acting transport minister |
2025-07-08 |
[AA.COM.TR] Russian President Vladimir Putin![]() on Monday announced the appointment of Andrey Sergeyevich Nikitin as the country's acting transport minister, after removing Roman Starovoyt from the post. ''Andrey Sergeyevich (Nikitin), I would like to invite you to take another step forward on your career ladder and work as the acting Minister of Transport of the Russian Federation,'' Putin said during a meeting with Nikitin, according to a video published by the Kremlin. Putin expressed his intention to submit Nikitin's candidacy to the State Duma, Russia's lower house of parliament, after which he would sign the decree on the final appointment if politicians support it. ''I hope that you will apply all your efforts, knowledge, skills, and organizational abilities to solve those tasks, the most important tasks that are in this area,'' he added. The move came after Putin signed an executive order on the dismissal of Starovoyt, who was appointed to the post just a year ago in May 2024. No reason was provided for his removal. In a press briefing Kremlin front man Dmitry Peskov said that Starovoyt's dismissal is not due to a "loss of trust." Peskov further said that Putin believes Nikitin's "working qualities and work experience" currently best serve the needs of the ministry. Nikitin had been serving as the deputy transport minister since February, and was previously the governor of Russia's northwestern Novgorod region. Says Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin: [ColonelCassad] The Russian Minister of Transport and former Governor of Kursk Oblast, Roman Starovoit, who was fired today (Putin's decree was published this morning), shot himself today at his dacha in Odintsovo. Apparently, a criminal case became inevitable and he decided to end it this way. The investigation into theft during the construction of fortifications in Kursk Oblast has been ongoing for a long time. Khinshtein's predecessor is involved in this case. But part of the investigation touches upon the period when Starovoit was still governor and at the beginning of the year there were many publications on the topic of whether Starovoit could not have known about the fraudulent schemes associated with fake contractors, through whom huge amounts of money allocated for the construction of field fortifications leaked out. One way or another, the investigation will still continue and then it will be clear from the facts - what exactly prompted Starovoit to commit suicide. The media reports that former Governor of Kursk Oblast Smirnov, who is under investigation, testified against Starovoit. Starovoit was at the ministry this morning, said goodbye to everyone, then went home and shot himself in his car in a parking lot in Odintsovo. |
Link |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Iran's President Says Israel Attempted His Assassination |
2025-07-08 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told American journalist Tucker Carlson that Israeli authorities had attempted to assassinate him. The interview appeared on the journalist's website on July 7. ![]() “Yes, they tried, they acted accordingly, but they failed,” the Iranian leader said in response to Carlson’s question on the matter. Pezeshkian noted that he was at a meeting where the future of the country was being discussed, while Israel attempted to strike the area where the meeting was taking place. He added that this attempt was made about a year and a half ago, and the United States was not involved in it. They're better now. Earlier, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that Israel's goal in the conflict with Iran is not a change of power in the Islamic Republic. He named three declared goals of the Zionist regime: the elimination of the nuclear program, the elimination of the missile program, and the elimination of the Iranian command. Later, US President Donald Trump did not rule out the possibility of a change of power in Iran if the current leadership fails to implement the slogan "Make Iran Great Again." Russian leader Vladimir Putin, in a conversation with the heads of international news agencies, refused to discuss the possibility of Israel killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the reaction to this. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Major General Mikhail Gudkov became twice Hero of Russia |
2025-07-07 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. Commentary by Russian military journalist Boris Rozhin. [ColonelCassad] Putin posthumously awarded the deceased brigade commander of the 155th Guards Naval Infantry Brigade, Mikhail Gudkov the title of Hero of Russia. ![]() This is Gudkov's 2nd Hero Star, which is extremely rare by the standards of the SVO. The brigade itself will receive the official name "named after Mikhail Gudkov". "To assign (...) the brigade (...) the honorary name (...) and henceforth to call it: the 155th Separate Guards Kursk orders of Zhukov and Suvorov Naval Infantry Brigade named after twice Hero of the Russian Federation Major General M.E. Gudkov."Quite a set of honorifics... The corresponding decree has already been signed. Considering Gudkov's merits on the battlefield and in organizing marine units - more than deserved. The 155th brigade showed itself well in battles both in the south and in the north. This year it played an important role in the liberation of the Kursk region. A serious loss for us. Such personnel must be protected. More from regnum.ru Putin called the deceased Major General Gudkov a real Russian officer Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Hero of Russia Mikhail Gudkov, who died in the border area of the Kursk region, was a real Russian officer. This was stated by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the People's Front forum on July 6. "On July 2, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Mikhail Evgenievich Gudkov, a native of the Donetsk region, died at his combat post. A true Russian officer. From the first day, he participated in a special military operation, commanded the legendary 155th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade of the Pacific Fleet," Putin said. The head of state emphasized that he defended and liberated the Kursk land and died in the combat zone, fulfilling his military duty. Putin recalled that he promoted Gudkov to the level of deputy commander-in-chief, and the officer had no direct need to be in combat formations and at command posts. “But he considered it his duty and fulfilled it to the end for Russia,” the Russian leader noted. The President also announced that the name of the deceased officer will be borne not only by the 155th Brigade, which he commanded, but also by a street in Donetsk and a school in the DPR, as well as a branch of the Nakhimov Naval School in Mariupol. Putin, addressing those gathered, called for a minute of silence in memory of Gudkov and all the soldiers who died during the special operation. As reported by the Regnum news agency, the death of the Hero of Russia was reported on July 3 by the governor of Primorye Oleg Kozhemyako. He said that Gudkov died while performing his duty as an officer together with his fellow soldiers. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
John Brennan was my boss at the CIA. He belongs in prison |
2025-07-06 |
[FOX40] Former CIA Director John Brennan was once my boss. Given what we just learned in a shocking new report about his role in the Trump Russia hysteria, he should be in prison. Here’s why. The CIA released fresh details yesterday about the creation nearly 10 years ago of the agency’s Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) of Russia’s influence campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It found that Russian President Vladimir Putin "aspired" to help then-candidate Donald Trump win the election. That assessment — ordered by then-President Barack Obama and executed by Brennan — ignited the Trump-Russia hoax that would haunt Trump’s presidency for four years. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director John Brennan participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, U.S., September 8, 2016. REUTERS/Gary Cameron We’re now learning five key details Brennan used to cook the books to ensure maximum damage to Trump. |
Link |
Europe | |
Macron's Secret Fear: Why He's Asking Russia to Influence Iran | |
2025-07-06 | |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Leonid Tsukanov [REGNUM] A few days ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin and his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron had telephone conversations. The first substantive conversation since autumn 2022 was initiated by Paris and largely concerned the Iranian issue. ![]() A little later, Le Parisien came out with a sensation: Macron’s sudden outburst was provoked by fears that Iranian missiles would reach Paris.
WITHIN REACH Macron's main secret fear, which French journalists have emphasized, is retaliatory strikes from the Iranians. In the early days of Israel's Operation Lion Force, Tehran threatened Tel Aviv's Western allies (including France) that any assistance to the latter in repelling Iranian attacks would be regarded as entering the war. This would give Iran the moral right to strike European targets in the Middle East. And a little later rumors began to spread that Iran had expanded the boundaries of a possible retaliatory operation, preparing (if the situation deteriorated sharply) to strike directly at Europe. And to use “the newest missiles” for these purposes. Most likely, they were talking about the Kheibar Shekan series of missiles, first introduced in 2022. The declared range of their upgraded version (Kheibar Shekan 2), which entered service shortly before the conflict, exceeds 2,000 kilometers, which is enough to reach the territory of France. The Ghadr-110 and Sajil-2 missiles have similar characteristics. And the heavy Khorramshahr-4 missile is capable of traveling more than 4,000 kilometers, which leaves Tehran with the hypothetical opportunity to strike any part of France, including the capital. WORKING FOR THE AUDIENCE However, Le Parisien journalists seriously exaggerated. Tehran did not plan to strike French territory and thereby provoke all NATO countries to enter the conflict at the same time. However, he was still able to seriously frighten the Elysee Palace by threatening the country with a possible withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) – following the example of the DPRK. Such statements should not be considered empty bravado, especially since Tehran is only a few symbolic steps away from withdrawing from the Treaty. In particular, contacts with the IAEA have already been reduced to a minimum, surveillance cameras at the country's key nuclear facilities have been dismantled, and a draft law on withdrawal has been developed, which the Iranian parliament, if necessary, can pass in a few days. All of this has created serious concerns in Paris that Tehran could embark on the path to developing nuclear weapons, although Iranian officials have strongly denied these plans. It is no coincidence that in his conversation with Putin, Macron at least several times emphasized the immutability and inviolability of the NPT. Apparently counting on Moscow using its authority to keep the Iranians from taking ill-considered steps and finally ending the negotiations on the “nuclear deal.” PRISONER EXCHANGE The Elysee Palace also has other pressing issues related to Tehran on its agenda. In particular, the need to repatriate two French citizens, Cecile Coler and Jacques Paris, who were accused of organizing unrest in Iran in 2022 and are still being held in the “political” prison of Evin. Efforts by the Elysee Palace to pressure reformist Iranian officials – including President Masoud Pezeshkian – to release their fellow citizens have been unsuccessful. Instead, Tehran has hardened its position over time, accusing the Evin prisoners of working for Israeli intelligence. Given the general tightening of the Iranian law enforcement authorities' attitude towards "Israeli agents" after "Lion Force," the fate of the French is unenviable: with a high degree of probability, they, like other arrested pro-Israeli figures, will soon be sentenced to death. Macron, who built his political image, among other things, around his readiness to defend the interests of French citizens at any cost, absolutely cannot allow this to happen. And since neither generous promises nor threats have ultimately worked, the only remaining way out is to seek the organization of an exchange process, in which Russia could act as a mediator. Unlike Tehran’s other foreign policy partners, Moscow enjoys a significant “credit of trust” in the eyes of the Iranian authorities, reinforced by the conclusion of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty in early 2025. This makes it a suitable guarantor of the transparency of the hypothetical exchange procedures. Tehran has something to demand from France. For example, it could include in the exchange list a group of ethnic Azerbaijanis who were collecting data on military logistics in Cyprus and were arrested by European security forces in late June. It is also possible to request the return to their homeland of Iranian activists detained in the United States several days ago, or to demand the extradition of several army defectors who previously moved first to Israel and from there to Europe. In all cases, this will require France to urgently work with its allies to persuade them to comply with Tehran's demands, which, unlike Macron, has nothing to lose regardless of the outcome of the deal. That is why the Elysee Palace is trying to buy time and is waiting for Moscow to help it in a gentlemanly manner in this matter. | |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Strengthening the Foundation: Constitutional Change Prepared Russia for the Special Military Operation |
2025-07-05 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Kirill Dvanov [REGNUM] Five years ago, on July 4, 2020, the updated version of the Russian Constitution came into force. The amendments to the Basic Law — which citizens approved in a nationwide vote and which the president approved by his decision — were not just a “legal fact.” ![]() The main document of the country, adopted back in 1993, now reflects modern realities. But the main thing is that the changes made to the Constitution also change the life of the country, determining its future. Five years after the amendments were approved, this is becoming obvious. POTENTIAL IS NOT EXHAUSTED, DEVELOPMENT IS NECESSARY At the beginning of 2020, when a discussion arose in society on the topic of “Is it time to adopt a new Constitution or significantly change the current one?”, Russia faced new challenges. The pandemic tested the country's economy and social security system, and the sanctions pressure of “Western partners” exacerbated the issue of protecting the country's sovereignty. The state and society faced serious tests, which meant that the country's legislative foundation required strengthening. "More than a quarter of a century has passed since the adoption of the 1993 Constitution. Social and state realities have changed so much since then that at a certain point society demanded that these changes be reflected in the basic law," Pavel Krasheninnikov, head of the State Duma Committee on State Building and Legislation, told Regnum News Agency. It is therefore not surprising that proposals to update the Constitution became the main topic in the message that Vladimir Putin addressed to legislators on January 15, 2020. The President, we recall, then indicated that a number of political and public associations were raising the issue of a new Basic Law. "I would like to answer right away - I believe that there is no such need," the head of state clarified." The potential of the 1993 Constitution is far from exhausted, and the fundamental foundations of the constitutional order, human rights and freedoms, I hope, will remain a solid value base for Russian society for many decades to come." The country's leader then explained how, from his point of view, the Constitution should be developed and strengthened for the sake of "further development of Russia as a legal social state in which the highest value is the freedoms and rights of citizens, human dignity, and well-being." Putin formulated ten proposals for amendments - or rather, for entire blocks of these amendments and additions. Among the things that the president announced at the time were: guarantees of the priority of Russian laws over international agreements, a ban on foreign citizenship for senior officials (as well as for parliamentarians and judges), and the consolidation of a "link" between authorities and local government. The head of state also mentioned a clear list of powers of the State Council, tougher requirements for candidates for the post of president, and an expansion of the powers of the chambers of parliament. WE DECIDED IT TOGETHER But the process of updating the Constitution was not limited to the president's proposals. The main thing that the country's leader pointed out on January 15, 2020, was that the amendments should take shape after discussion in society. On the same day, Putin ordered the creation of a working group, which included not only lawyers and officials, but also public figures and experts in various fields. Any citizen could submit proposals. Thus, in addition to the changes developed by specialists, "people's amendments" appeared in the project. They secured the special role of family values and the Russian language, they spoke about the inalienability of Russian territories, about the state's responsibility for preserving nature. The supplemented and new articles of the Constitution, which included "people's amendments", significantly changed the appearance of the Basic Law. "The culture and history of Russia are now under the jurisdiction of the entire state, and not regions or public organizations. Also, thanks to these amendments, Russia affirms traditional spiritual and moral values as immutable and universally binding," noted Irina Velikanova, head of the Public Chamber's commission on culture and preservation of spiritual heritage and general director of the Museum of Contemporary History of Russia, in an interview with IA Regnum. "The institutions of marriage, labor, and traditional religions should no longer be challenged as correct and the only true ones for the development of society. For the first time in the history of constitutional law in Russia, the Russian people and the Russian language as state-forming values have found their reflection," Velikanova emphasizes. The project passed its main test on June 25 - July 1, 2020, when the all-Russian vote took place. Of the 67.9%, or almost 58 million Russians who cast their votes, the amendments were approved by an overwhelming majority - 77.9%. The will of the citizens was approved by the president, who signed a decree on July 3, 2020, thanks to which the amendments came into effect the next day. REPAIR OF THE "FASTENING FRAME" Next, deputies and senators had to update and “reboot” the current laws. Over the past 5 years, more than two hundred documents have been adopted that change our legislation, bringing it into line with the new requirements of the Constitution, explained Deputy Krasheninnikov. The latest law, which concerns local self-government, came into force the other day. "The amendments stabilized the changes that had taken place over the three decades since the adoption of the country's Basic Law. The changes provided an opportunity for further movement forward - slowly and not fragmentarily, as was sometimes suggested, but systematically," the interlocutor emphasizes. The amendments made the very structure of our legislation clearer - "federal and regional laws complement and develop each other, eliminating legal uncertainty," Krasheninnikov noted. In 2021, he and his colleagues adopted a law that, developing the new section of the Constitution on the State Council, more clearly defined how this "platform" works, where heads of regions and representatives of the federal center discuss how the country's foreign and domestic policy will develop. The fact that the work of the power mechanism and its “coupling” with society became more coordinated has justified itself both during the COVID crisis and, perhaps even more so, with the beginning of the Cold War. The Western countries that set the Kiev regime against Russia clearly expected to shake the “building” of Russian statehood, but it turned out to be stable thanks to the “repaired” framework. Not least of all thanks to the articles protecting sovereignty, including from various kinds of foreign agents. At the same time, let us recall that the Constitution prescribed the authorities to support patriotic civil initiatives, public organizations and volunteer movements. Volunteers who worked during the pandemic and those who during the SVO help our new fellow citizens in Donbass and Novorossiya operate in the "field" created by the updated Constitution. Now, when former “partners” are tightening sanctions, articles that require the state to support domestic science and medicine are playing an increasingly important role. PEOPLE FELT THE CHANGES THEMSELVES The updated Constitution not only more clearly defined the “rules of the game” at the level of ministers, deputies and governors (now that they are prohibited from having dual citizenship and accounts abroad, it will no longer be possible to be a “servant of two masters”). The changes also affected ordinary Russians, including those who need special care from the state. The amendments, which concern increasing the state's responsibility for social guarantees, made annual increases in pensions and benefits mandatory, noted deputy Krasheninnikov. In order to make sure that the amendments are working, it is enough to refer to the data on the government website. The Basic Law requires pensions to be indexed taking into account inflation. And, for example, in 2020, the social part of these payments was “increased” by 6.1%, in April of last year — by 7.5%, and a year later, in April 2025, by 14.75%. The same applies to insurance pensions, which are indexed annually: for example, at the beginning of 2024 by 7.5%, and this New Year by another 7.5% (plus a one-time payment of 10 thousand rubles to all pensioners in February). According to the requirements of the updated Constitution, the minimum wage is linked to the subsistence minimum and pension indexation. On the government website you can see: if on January 1, 2020 the minimum wage in Russia was 12,130 rubles, then over the past five years this figure has “grown” more than once — by an average of 13% per year. This year the minimum wage is already 22,440 rubles. THE EXPLOITS OF THE PEOPLE ARE FORBIDDEN TO BE REVIEWED The state guarantees that it will not abandon people in the most difficult conditions and, what is no less important, the government is obliged to follow the principles that are common to most people. Yes, the Constitution still has an article prohibiting the establishment of a state ideology in Russia. The correctness of this position was confirmed, among other things, by the fact that on the fronts of the SVO, Russia is equally bravely defended by people of the most diverse views, worldviews and party affiliations. But at the same time, the Basic Law enshrined what is dear to all of us. "It's been 5 years already! Today we are convinced that our citizens made the right choice. First of all, I would like to talk about the humanitarian amendments, about those innovations that affected the spiritual sphere of society's life, " Elena Velikanova emphasizes. " The country's basic law has finally enshrined a national view of history. Russia, according to the basic law, is now a country with a 1,000-year history, and not a formation that arose out of nowhere in 1991. The essence of Russia's historical existence is the feats of our people, which are prohibited from being revised." |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Ukrainian Armed Forces struck Donetsk with shrapnel-type missiles for the HIMARS MLRS |
2025-07-05 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] As a result of the attack by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) on Donetsk, four people were killed. This was reported by the head of the Donetsk People's Republic Denis Pushilin. ![]() He specified that the Petrovsky district of the city was hit. Ukrainian military attacked it with shrapnel-type missiles for HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems. “Four people died: women born in 1994 and 1986, men born in 1988 and 1983,” Pushilin wrote on his Telegram channel. In addition, one local resident received serious injuries, another one - moderately. Two men were also injured. The head of the DPR added that all victims are receiving the necessary medical assistance. As reported by the Regnum news agency, on July 4, the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked the territory of Donetsk. The strike hit the village of Trudovskie in the Petrovsky district in the west of the city. The shell hit the road and a passing car. Late in the evening of June 30, Ukrainian troops attacked the center of Donetsk, causing a fire. In the Voroshilovsky district of the city, a woman was killed in the attack, and a teenager and a man were injured. The Sokol market stalls, the central department store, and a bank were damaged. According to the Investigative Committee, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used high-precision air-to-surface cruise missiles Storm Shadow. They fired at an area where there were no weapons or military equipment. The fragments and shrapnel found at the site were seized for examination. On July 1, presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov said that Russia strongly condemns the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strikes on peaceful cities and is taking measures to minimize such risks. On June 4, Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasized that the Kiev regime is deliberately striking civilians. The head of state also noted that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to strike civilian targets, residential buildings, and civilian transport, including ambulances and agricultural machinery. Putin called the methods used by Ukrainian formations and Kiev's foreign mercenaries terrorist. More from regnum.ru Four people were killed as a result of the Ukrainian Armed Forces strike on Donetsk Four people were killed as a result of the Ukrainian Armed Forces strike on Donetsk's Petrovsky district. This was reported on July 4 by RIA Novosti. The strike was carried out on the settlement of Trudovskie in the western part of the city. According to the agency, two women and two men were killed as a result of the strike. The shell hit the road and a passing car. |
Link |