Arabia |
U.S. Military: American Airstrike Kills Al-Qaeda Boss in Yemen |
2017-06-24 |
[Breitbart] An American military airstrike in Yemen has killed Abu Khattab al-Awlaqi, a “trusted and experienced” emir of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), and two of his colleagues, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has announced. Citing a statement from CENTCOM, the Pentagon notes: Al Awlaqi was a senior leader responsible for planning and conducting terrorist attacks against civilians… He had significant influence throughout al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula’s terrorist stronghold, had ties and access to the group’s other senior leaders, and was implicated in planning and leading efforts to exacerbate instability in southern Yemen… Al Awlaqi’s death removes a trusted and experienced terrorist leader from al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula’s ranks. The U.S. military killed the AQAP chief on June 16. CENTCOM reports: U.S. forces conducted an airstrike against three al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula militants in Shabwah Governorate, Yemen, June 16, to disrupt terrorist compounds, and attack networks in Yemen. Abu Khattab al Awlaqi, the emir for AQAP’s terrorist stronghold in Shabwah Governorate, was killed in the strike along with two of his AQAP associates. President Donald Trump’s administration has escalated U.S. military efforts against Yemen’s AQAP, considered the most potent al-Qaeda branch that poses the biggest threat to the United States. U.S. troops, in coordination with the Yemeni government, have been carrying out a series of counterterrorism operations against AQAP to degrade the terrorist group’s ability to hold territory and conduct external terror attacks, according to CENTCOM. Since Trump took office, the U.S. military has launched an excess of 80 airstrikes against al-Qaeda, more than double the average of those carried out over the past five years, points out Fox News. The recent airstrike killed the AQAP emir in Yemen’s Shabwah governorate where the jihadist group has established a stronghold that allows it to plot attacks against the United States and its allies across the world. AQAP has capitalized on the security and political chaos in Yemen to recruit fighters, expand its influence, and capture territory. Moreover, the Saudi Arabia-led coalition’s nearly single-minded focus to defeat the Iran-allied Shiite Houthis in Yemen has allowed the Sunni AQAP group to flourish. AQAP claims it receives support from the U.S.-backed Saudi-led Sunni alliance. The Saudi-led alliance has been fighting in Yemen since March of 2015. AQAP is “building an emirate” in Yemen, Thomas Joscelyn from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) told lawmakers in March. Echoing the claims from the terrorist group, the FDD expert noted that “some of AQAP’s leaders are also partnered with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and [U.S.-backed Yemeni President Abdrabbuh Mansour] Hadi’s government in the war against the Houthis.” |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | |||
Obama To Release the Worst of the Worst from Gitmo | |||
2016-05-26 | |||
![]() The move comes as President Obama continues to try to close the camp in the face of congressional resistance. The administration so far has reduced the population from 242 detainees to 80. But one official said the detainees remaining at the camp represent the "worst of the worst." The official was not confident the countries ultimately receiving these terrorists would be up to the task of keeping them locked up or even tracking them. While an Obama administration task force found many detainees should remain in U.S. custody, a new review board in 2011 looked at the cases and reached a different conclusion, though much of the evidence was the same. The White House still maintains that closing the camp makes the most sense. "It's a recruiting tool for those who wish to do us harm," spokesman Eric Schultz said. Still, the most recent issue of Al Qaeda’s propaganda magazine said it’s the Arab-Israeli conflict that drives Al Qaeda recruitment ‐ not the detention center. The issue says: "Many have joined jihad because of the Palestinian ’rhetoric’ compared to Guantanamo."
"If you take a detainee, it comes with a responsibility. That responsibility is to make sure the detainee doesn't return to the fight, or you will lose American federal aid. It's pretty straightforward," Lankford explained. | |||
Link |
Terror Networks |
Is bin Laden's son being groomed for key al Qaeda role? |
2016-05-17 |
[CNN] One of the late Osama bin Laden's ... who is now sometimes referred to as Mister Bones... sons could be expanding his role as a terrorist front man, with al Qaeda this week releasing another video that features his voice. On Monday, an audio recording surfaced in which Hamza bin Laden calls for unity among jihadi hard boyz in Syria, who currently fight under competing banners ranging from ISIS to al Qaeda. He also calls for jihad against Israel and its American backers to "liberate" Paleostine, according to a translation by the SITE Intelligence Group. It is his second such recording in less than a year, and could represent an effort by al Qaeda to capitalize on the impact of the bin Laden name. "Obviously, he has the family name," said CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen. "He's now playing a propaganda role, and he's a lot younger than some of the other leaders of al Qaeda, in their 50s or their 60s." Hamza bin Laden is believed to be in his early or mid-20s, and could represent al Qaeda's next generation. "From a very early age, his father was kind of grooming him," said Bergen, who just published the book "United States of Jihad." "Hamza has been very much indoctrinated with the whole jihadi kind of message. He's a true believer. I think that makes him a concern." Hamza bin Laden was not at his father's compound at the time of the raid by American special forces in 2011 -- unlike one of his brothers, who was killed there. Papers found at the compound indicate that Hamza had been sent off for terrorist training. "Just a month before the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound, we know Hamza was somewhere else in Pakistain being trained by al Qaeda leadership," said Thomas Joscelyn, a terrorism researcher with The Long War Journal. "He was receiving high-end explosives training." But it is not clear whether Hamza bin Laden now has an operational role in planning terrorist attacks, or whether his role is primarily focused on Qaeda's propaganda operation. According to Joscelyn, "al Qaeda is saying, 'This is the new generation of jihadi leadership. This is the new bin Laden, who is going to ultimately lead us into the future." One U.S. intelligence official tells CNN that Hamza bin Laden currently has a relatively small role in the organization, but that al Qaeda could be grooming him for possible future leadership positions. "I don't think he's necessarily going to run al Qaeda tomorrow," said Bergen, "but the family name, the fact that he's a younger guy, the fact that he's a true believer -- all that suggests that he likely will play an important role in al Qaeda going forward." While al Qaeda's subsidiary franchises have been thriving in Yemen, Syria, and North Africa, al Qaeda's parent organization in Pakistain has lost a number of top leaders, many of them to American strikes. Showcasing Hamza bin Laden, according to another U.S. intelligence official, "appears to be an attempt by al Qaeda to fill gaps in its ever-dwindling bench." |
Link |
Terror Networks |
Benghazi Terror Suspect Turned ISIS Operative Killed By US Airstrike |
2015-06-24 |
[DAILYCALLER] A Benghazi terror suspect and Islamic State ...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allaharound with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not reallyMoslems.... operative was killed by a U.S. ... the home of a particularly ferocious and hairy djinn... June 15, according to the Pentagon. Ali Awni al-Harzi was a key battlefield commander for the Islamic State, reports ABC News. The Tunisian national helped foreigner fighters join the terror group, moving them across the Turkish border into Syria. Harzi was a "person of interest" in the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in the Libyan city of Benghazi, killing U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, according to the Pentagon. He was one of the first publicly-named suspects in the raid. Reporter Eli Lake, then of The Daily Beast, said U.S. officials were alerted to Harzi's involvement after he posted about the attack on social media after it began. A month later, Harzi was jugged Drop the gat, Rocky, or you're a dead 'un! in ...the only place on the face of the earth that misses the Ottoman Empire.... and deported to Tunisia, where he was questioned by the FBI, reports The Long War Journal. After his release in January of 2013, then Secretary of State ![]() ... sometimes described as The Heroine of Tuzlaand at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Dean Rusk... said Tunisian officials "had 'assured' the United States that Harzi was 'under the monitoring of the court,'" reports Thomas Joscelyn. The Department of State designated Harzi as a terrorist in April. |
Link |
Government |
Top Intel Official: Al Qaeda Had Doubled When Obama Claimed It Had Been Decimated |
2015-03-07 |
Photo at right is of LTG(Ret) Mike Flynn, former Director, DIA and source of the Hayes/Joscelyn WSJ article. In spring 2012, a year after the raid that killed bin Laden and six months before the 2012 presidential election, the Obama administration launched a concerted campaign to persuade the American people that the long war with al Qaeda was ending. In a speech commemorating the anniversary of the raid, John Brennan , Mr. Obama's top counterterrorism adviser and later his CIA director, predicted the imminent demise of al Qaeda. The next day, on May 1, 2012, Mr. Obama made a bold claim: "The goal that I set--to defeat al Qaeda and deny it a chance to rebuild--is now within our reach." The White House provided 17 handpicked documents to the Combatting Terror Center at the West Point military academy, where a team of analysts reached the conclusion the Obama administration wanted. Bin Laden, they found, had been isolated and relatively powerless, a sad and lonely man sitting atop a crumbling terror network. It was a reassuring portrayal. It was also wrong. And those responsible for winning the war--as opposed to an election--couldn't afford to engage in such dangerous self-delusion. Now, with this in hand, will someone please take it one step further and investigate the political theater that we know as the Abbattaba raid and the scapegoating of Pakistani Dr. Shakeel Afridi ? LTG Flynn's Keynote Address: National Defense Industrial Association, 26th Annual SO/LIC Symposium, Wash, D.C. 28 Jan 2015. |
Link |
Africa North |
Libya "not one big mess, but a bunch of little messes that are not very related" US Congress Committee told |
2013-11-24 |
![]() "It is in our national security interest to ensure Libya becomes a stable and democratic partner capable of addressing regional security challenges and advancing our shared interests," said US Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Richard Schmierer, told a US Senate committee on Thursday. He was speaking at a meeting of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs which was discussing the political, economic and security situation in Africa. "We sometimes pay a little less attention to [North Africa] than I think we should," commented Senator Tim Kaine, Chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs. US politicians' emphasis on security was evident in the panels' composition and discussion, with Libya a key area of focus. A major concern was how best to address the growing power of the militias over official security institutions, allowing what panellists agreed was a climate of instability that fostered increased terrorist activity in Libya and the region. Thomas Joscelyn, Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that it was, "clear that it's part of Al Qaeda's plan in Libya to co-opt and work with certain of these militias". Responding to rumours after the 6 October raid by US special forces on Libyan soil that tossed in the slammer Don't shoot, coppers! I'm comin' out! alleged Al-Qaeda member Nazih Abdul-Hamid Al-Ruqai (also known as Abu Anas Al-Libi), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defence for African Affairs Amanda Dory reaffirmed that an international peacekeeping force in Libya was "not the approach that we are supporting". The US instead looked to fulfil Libyan requests to train a general purpose force as the core of a new Libyan Army. The US is committed to training from 5,000 to 8,000 soldiers and the UK and Italia an additional 2,000 each. Frederic Wehrey, Senior Associate in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, cautioned that a general-purpose force would only be effective if it had a clearly defined mission, effective civilian oversight, non-partisan, inclusive, and professional composition with members free of a criminal background and past human rights When they're defined by the state or an NGO they don't mean much... abuses, and was combined with concurrent programs to reintegrate former revolutionary fighters into civilian life. |
Link |
Terror Networks |
Al Qaeda Reborn? |
2013-07-29 |
[WEEKLYSTANDARD] Are we watching the demise of al Qaeda or its rebirth? A bracing new piece in the Daily Beast makes a persuasive case that it's the latter -- that recent developments in Iraq, across the greater Middle East and South Asia point to a resurgence of al Qaeda and a strengthening of its affiliates. The piece bolsters the compelling arguments made in THE WEEKLY STANDARD last month by Thomas Joscelyn, who wrote that the B.O. regime was pursuing a "see no evil" strategy on al Qaeda, willfully choosing to downplay or ignore troubling evidence that contradicts the administration's claims that al Qaeda is mortally maimed and "on the path to defeat." But what makes the new piece in the Daily Beast especially noteworthy is that it comes from Bruce Riedel, who served as a top adviser on Afghanistan and Pakistain in the Obama White House and wrote the administration's initial strategy review of the region. |
Link |
Africa North | |||
Zawahiri's Brother Defends Benghazi Suspect | |||
2012-10-06 | |||
![]()
No one should take Mohammed al Zawahiri at his word. As a commander in the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) organization, a core part of the al Qaeda joint venture, he has established a web of nefarious ties that go far beyond his brother. In fact, according to the very same WSJ article Mohammed al Zawahiri objects to, he helped put Ahmad in touch with Ayman al Zawahiri. "U.S. officials believe [Mohammed al Zawahiri] has helped Mr. Ahmad connect with the al Qaeda chief," the WSJ reported. The WSJ explains: "Western officials say Mr. Ahmad has petitioned the chief of al Qaeda, to whom he has long ties, for permission to launch an al Qaeda affiliate and has secured financing from al Qaeda's Yemeni wing." Given that Ahmad's forces are suspected of taking part in the Benghazi attack, which reportedly involved other al Qaeda parties (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Ansar al Sharia, etc.), it would be a mistake to assume that nothing came of Ahmad's petition of Ayman al Zawahiri. Not just anyone receives financing from al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), as Ahmad reportedly has. This brings us back to Mohammed al Zawahiri. He denies everything, of course. Mohammed al Zawahiri denies that he has resumed his terrorist career. He also denies having anything to do with the ransacking of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, claiming that he only meant to launch a protest outside the compound's walls. U.S. intelligence officials, judging by the WSJ account and other reporting, clearly don't believe Mohammed al Zawahiri's denials. So the question becomes, what (if anything) is Morsi's government going to do about him and his ilk?
A source with direct knowledge of Egyptian government talks with jihadists in the Sinai says al-Zawahiri is helping negotiations. The source says al-Zawahiri has the respect of the Islamists and the trust of the new government. So while U.S. intelligence officials believe that Mohammed al Zawahiri is helping to put terrorists in touch with the head of al Qaeda, the Egyptian government "trust(s)" him to help negotiate with terrorists in the Sinai. It is safe to say there is a major disconnect here. Thomas Joscelyn is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies | |||
Link |
Africa North | ||
Rebel Commander in Libya Fought Against U.S. in Afghanistan | ||
2011-03-25 | ||
On his own admission, rebel leader Abdul-Hakim al-Hasadi fought American troops in Afghanistan and recruited Libyans to fight American troops in Iraq.
Now, however, al-Hasadi has admitted in an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore that he fought against American forces in Afghanistan. (Hat-tip: Thomas Joscelyn at the Weekly Standard.) Al-Hasadi says that he is the person responsible for the defense of Darnah -- not the town's "Emir." In a previous interview with Canada's Globe and Mail, he claimed to have a force of about 1,000 men and to have commanded rebel units in battles around the town of Bin Jawad. "I have never been at Guantanamo," al-Hasadi explained to Il Sole 24 Ore. "I was captured in 2002 in Peshawar in Pakistan, while I was returning from Afghanistan where I fought against the foreign invasion. I was turned over to the Americans, detained for a few months in Islamabad, then turned over to Libya and released from prison in 2008."
| ||
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Inmates' fate unclear if Obama closes Gitmo |
2008-12-30 |
![]() Terrorism experts and two recent analyses of unclassified information on the prison population indicate the men who remain there are either committed, highly skilled al-Qaeda operatives too dangerous to ever free, or Islamists whose native countries would do little to prevent them from rejoining the jihad. Guantanamo opened in 2002 and once held hundreds of foreigners caught on battlefields overseas or nabbed based on intelligence against them. About 500 detainees since have been returned home. Some were low-level al-Qaeda sympathizers. Other, more dangerous men were released because their home countries vowed to keep tabs on them, according to the Pentagon. Still, the Pentagon has said several of those freed did return to jihad. One man released to his native country of Kuwait blew himself up in Iraq in May, killing six people. Of the detainees who remain in Guantanamo, about 80 will be tried and either kept there or sent home to serve their sentences. Another 60 have been cleared for release, though the Pentagon has not found countries to accept them. Then there are about 110 men of whom little is known but who, the Pentagon says, may be too dangerous to America and its allies to ever be let out. Thomas Joscelyn, a terrorism analyst and senior editor of The Long War Journal, has studied public information released by the Pentagon about the remaining Guantanamo detainees. He established four red flags to gauge how dangerous each detainee was: if they participated in an al-Qaeda or Taliban training camp, stayed at special Islamist guesthouses where terrorists are shuttled to the front or to training, participated in recruiting networks across the Middle East or engaged in hostilities in Afghanistan or elsewhere. Joscelyn found that at least 46% engaged in hostilities, 48% participated in the recruiting network, 60% stayed in a guest house, and 72% attended training camps. These men have knowledge and skills that would be critical to al-Qaeda again, he said. "You have some guys who are a first-order threat," Joscelyn said. A review by the Brookings Institution found that some of the "Gitmo 110" are eligible for release but have not been freed because their countries of origin are sympathetic to their cause. Hundreds of detainees have been released to countries such as Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Pakistan because the United States has good relationships with those countries and can trust that they will monitor the released detainees responsibly, said Benjamin Wittes, co-author of Brookings' report. That has left Guantanamo with a disproportionately high number of lower-risk detainees from Yemen, which has not policed its population and serves as an easy gateway for terrorists into Iraq, Wittes said. Wittes cautioned that these men are far from harmless, describing them as "quite committed." While the Obama transition team did not return e-mails seeking comment, the Pentagon says shutting down Guantanamo means only that another facility must be found. Pentagon spokesman Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon points to Mohammed Atta, one of the Sept. 11 hijackers. Atta had come up on the radar of national security officials well before 9/11 but had not committed a violent act. "What would you have done with them?" Gordon said. "These are enemy combatants who wish to do harm to the United States. Our government has an obligation to protect the public." Others do not believe the Pentagon or the Bush administration when they call these men a threat. "We simply cannot take any of the administration's claims as true," said Air Force Maj. David Frakt, a defense lawyer who represents Guantanamo detainees. Frakt said many people who attend training camps or join jihadist movements do so sometimes to show solidarity with oppressed Muslims. Each detainee is given an initial review by a military tribunal to determine whether they're an enemy combatant to be held until cessation of hostilities in the current war on terror. The combatant then receives an annual review to determine whether he is no longer considered a danger and is eligible for release. Retired Army major general John Altenburg, who once oversaw the Guantanamo cases for the Pentagon, said those reviews are "unprecedented" in war. "In any other country, in any other place, they wouldn't be bothering to make that determination," Altenburg said. "They would just say, 'We've detained them legally and we can hold them.' " Davis has disagreed, calling the review panels are unfair. He said most of the evidence presented in the review boards is classified and detainees were rarely able to confront the evidence used against them. Davis said the U.S. would be enraged if one of its soldiers were held under such conditions. But the Bush administration has said that U.S. soldiers are entitled to special treatment as prisoners of war because they follow the rules of war. They wear uniforms and answer to a command structure and a nation. Those in Guantanamo are not soldiers but terrorists who violate the rules of war by pretending to be civilians and targeting civilians, it says. Altenburg said no matter the debate, the global war on terror will not end with the Bush administration and Obama will need to figure out what to do with captives in this war. "We can detain people that we apprehend in that war as long as the war is still going on," he said. "That may be 10 or 20 years." |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | ||
NIE: An Abrupt About-Face | ||
2007-12-06 | ||
![]()
Consider that on July 11, 2007, roughly four or so months prior to the most recent NIEs publication, Deputy Director of Analysis Thomas Fingar gave the following testimony before the House Armed Services Committee: Iran and North Korea are the states of most concern to us. The United States concerns about Iran are shared by many nations, including many of Irans neighbors. Iran is continuing to pursue uranium enrichment and has shown more interest in protracting negotiations and working to delay and diminish the impact of UNSC sanctions than in reaching an acceptable diplomatic solution. We assess that Tehran is determined to develop nuclear weapons--despite its international obligations and international pressure. This is a grave concern to the other countries in the region whose security would be threatened should Iran acquire nuclear weapons. This paragraph appeared under the subheading: "Iran Assessed As Determined to Develop Nuclear Weapons." And the entirety of Fingars 22-page testimony was labeled "Information as of July 11, 2007." No part of it is consistent with the latest NIE, in which our spooks tell us Iran suspended its covert nuclear weapons program in 2003 "primarily in response to international pressure" and they "do not know whether (Iran) currently intends to develop nuclear weapons." The inconsistencies are more troubling when we realize that, according to the Wall Street Journal, Thomas Fingar is one of the three officials who were responsible for crafting the latest NIE. The Journal cites "an intelligence source" as describing Fingar and his two colleagues as "hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials." (The New York Sun drew attention to one of Fingars colleagues yesterday.) So, if it is true that Dr. Fingar played a leading role in crafting this latest NIE, then we are left with serious questions: Why did your opinion change so drastically in just four months time? Many in the mainstream press have been willing to cite this latest NIE unquestioningly. Perhaps they should start asking some pointed questions. (Dont hold your breath.)
| ||
Link |
Terror Networks |
Iran, Osama and 9/11 |
2007-09-28 |
Frontpage Interviews guest today is Thomas Joscelyn, an expert on the international terrorist network. Excerpt: FP: What evidence ties Iran to al Qaeda as early as 1990? Joscelyn: According to Lawrence Wright in his book The Looming Tower, a top al Qaeda operative named Ali Mohamed told the FBI that Ayman al Zawahiri and the Iranians agreed to cooperate on a coup attempt in Egypt in 1990. The Iranians have long targeted Hosni Mubaraks regime and so they were very willing to assist Zawahiris Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) in a coup attempt. According to Mohamed, the Iranians gave Zawahiri $2 million and trained his EIJ operatives for the coup attempt, which was ultimately aborted. Coming from Ali Mohamed, this is especially damning testimony. Mohamed was one of the U.S. Governments star witnesses during the trial of some of the al Qaeda terrorists responsible for the August 7, 1998, embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Mohamed himself admitted to his involvement in the embassy bombings he did the surveillance that was used to plan the operation. He also looms large in al Qaedas early history: he compiled al Qaedas first training manual, trained bin Ladens security guards, helped organize al Qaedas move from Afghanistan to the Sudan in the early 1990s, and was trusted by Zawahiri to penetrate Americas intelligence and military establishments (he even feigned cooperation with the CIA as an informant and went on to become a sergeant in the U.S. Army). So, Mohameds testimony is good evidence that the Iranians and al Qaeda were cooperating all the way back in 1990. FP: And the cooperation didnt end there, did it? Joscelyn: No, it did not end there. There is evidence of cooperation between Iran, Hezbollah and al Qaeda from 1990 through the present. I go into more detail about this evidence in Irans Proxy War Against America, but let me provide some of the highlights here. According to the 9/11 Commission, the Iranians and al Qaeda held discussions in the early 1990s. During the embassy bombings trial we learned that one of these meetings involved a sit down between Imad Mugniyah, who is Irans master terrorist as well as Hezbollahs chief of terrorist operations, and Osama bin Laden. As a result of these meetings, Iran and al Qaeda agreed to cooperate on attacks against America and Israel. Al Qaeda terrorists were then trained in Iranian and Hezbollah training camps in Lebanon, Sudan and Iran. Mugniyah had a profound impact on al Qaedas transition from an Afghani-based insurgency group into an international terrorist empire. As a result of the cooperation between Mugniyah and bin Laden, al Qaeda consciously modeled itself after Hezbollah in many ways. As Lawrence Wright notes in The Looming Tower, there are good reasons to suspect that al Qaeda even adopted the use of suicide bombers because of Hezbollahs influence. I think that prior to 1993 (there may be an isolated incident or two prior to then), suicide attacks were an anathema to Sunni Islam. They were strictly prohibited. The Shiite Hezbollah, however, had used suicide bombers since as early 1983, when Mugniyahs suicide truck bombers destroyed the U.S. embassy and the U.S. Marine Barracks in Lebanon. Zawahiri and al Qaeda adopted suicide attacks as their modus operandi only in the early 1990s, after Hezbollah had shown them the utility of such operations. According to Bob Baer in See No Evil, the CIA uncovered evidence that Mugniyah helped facilitate the travel of an al Qaeda terrorist en route to an attack on the Egyptian embassy in Pakistan in 1995. In June 1996, according to Gerald Posner in Why America Slept, the CIA obtained reports from a terrorist summit in Tehran. The reports indicated that al Qaeda, Iran and Hezbollah had agreed to step up their attacks on American targets throughout the Middle East. A few days later, on June 25, 1996, Hezbollah under direct orders from Tehran bombed the Khobar Towers complex in Saudi Arabia. The 9/11 Commission found that in addition to strong evidence of Irans involvement, there were also signs that al Qaeda played a role in the Khobar Towers bombing. Al Qaeda had reportedly been planning a similar operation in the months prior to the attack and intelligence officials found that bin Laden was congratulated by senior al Qaeda members, such as Ayman al Zawahiri, shortly thereafter. Contemporaneous reports by the CIA and the State Department noted that Iran and al Qaeda were both suspects. Therefore, although we dont know for sure, there is, at the very least, a strong possibility that the Khobar Towers operation was a joint operation between Iran, Hezbollah and al Qaeda. The 9/11 Commission found that the al Qaeda cell in Kenya, which was responsible for bombing the embassy there on August 7, 1998, was trained by Hezbollah for the operation. The 9/11 Commission also found that there is evidence that Iran and Hezbollah facilitated the travels of 8 to 10 of the hijackers responsible for the September 11 attacks. There is strong evidence that Iran helped al Qaeda and Taliban members escape from Afghanistan in late 2001 and, therefore, evade American justice. Finally, Iran harbors senior al Qaeda leaders such as Saif al Adel (al Qaedas military chief) and Saad bin Laden (Osamas son and heir) to this day. This is just some of the evidence of Irans involvement in al Qaedas terror. FP: So in your opinion, what is the strongest evidence of Irans support for al Qaeda? Joscelyn: The simultaneous suicide bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7, 1998. As I explain in Irans Proxy War Against America, there is strong evidence that: (1) Bin Laden and al Qaeda deliberately modeled the attack after Hezbollahs simultaneous suicide bombings of the U.S. Marine barracks and a headquarters for French paratroopers in Lebanon in 1983. (2) According to the 9/11 Commission, Iran and Hezbollah trained at least one of the cells responsible for the attack. They showed them how to execute this type of operation. (3) There is evidence that Iran supplied al Qaeda with a large amount of explosives used in the attack. (4) Iran gives safe haven to the senior al Qaeda terrorist wanted for his involvement in the bombings, Saif al Adel, to this day. Therefore, we have Iran and Hezbollah inspiring, training, arming and giving safe haven to the al Qaeda terrorists responsible for the embassy bombings. And this was al Qaedas most successful operation prior to 9/11. If this isnt support for al Qaeda, then I dont know what is. |
Link |