Home Front: Politix |
Top Democrat vows to block possible Bush nominee |
2007-09-13 |
![]() Congressional and administration officials have described Olson as a leading contender for the job as the nation's chief U.S. law enforcement officer, but Reid declared: "Ted Olson will not be confirmed" by the Senate. "He's a partisan, and the last thing we need as an attorney general is a partisan," Reid told Reuters in a brief hallway interview on Capitol Hill. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
NRO Bryon York: It (NSA) Is Legal |
2006-03-15 |
In early September 2002, just before the first anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, a group of lawyers gathered in a heavily protected, windowless room in the Department of Justice building in Washington. There were three federal appeals-court judges, Laurence Silberman, Edward Leavy, and Ralph Guy. There was Theodore Olson, the U.S. solicitor general. There was Larry Thompson, the deputy attorney general. And there was John Yoo, the Justice official who had closely studied questions of war powers and presidential authority. Rounding out the group were a few other department staffers, one official from the FBI, and David Addington, Vice President Cheney's top lawyer. The purpose of the meeting was to argue a case whose details remain so classified that they are known by only a few people, but whose outcome, a decision known as In re: Sealed Case, has become one of the key documents in the hottest argument in Washington today: the fight over what President Bush calls the "terrorist surveillance" of persons with known al-Qaeda connections, and what the president's opponents call "domestic spying." The three judges made up what is known as the FISA Court of Review. It was created in 1978 by the now-famous Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The act required that the president go to the so-called FISA Court to seek a warrant for surveillance in top-secret foreign-intelligence cases. For any disputed decisions that might arise, Congress also created the Court of Review, a sort of super-secret appeals court. More at NRO link... |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | ||
Prisoners test legal limits of war on terror at USSC | ||
2004-04-19 | ||
The Bush administration has labeled all of them "enemy combatants," and says the detentions are necessary to stop future terrorist plots. The cases test whether the Guantanamo detainees should have access to U.S. courts to challenge their detentions, and whether the president, on his own, can order U.S. citizens locked up without charges and access to a lawyer or a hearing. Together, the cases raise fundamental questions about judges' ability to check presidential power, and about basic legal protections for captured foreigners and for U.S. citizens accused of betraying this country. Rulings in the cases could go a long way toward shaping the legal contours for what could be a lengthy war on terrorism. They also will help define the legacy of the court led by conservative Chief Justice William Rehnquist. The hearings at the court will feature the drama of a Sept. 11 widower, U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson, arguing for broad presidential authority to lock up people to protect national security. Before Olson will be nine justices who shared in the panic that swept Washington on 9/11. Several justices have poignant, personal memories of wartime experiences. All but one â Clarence Thomas, at 55 the youngest justice â came of age during World War II or the Korean War.
| ||
Link |
Home Front | |
Supremes to Hear Cases of Gitmo Detainees | |
2003-11-10 | |
The Supreme Court will hear its first case arising from the governmentâs anti-terrorism campaign following the Sept. 11 attacks, agreeing Monday to consider whether foreigners held at a U.S. Navy base in Cuba should have access to American courts. The appeals came from British, Australian and Kuwaiti citizens held with more than 600 others suspected of being Taliban or Al Qaeda foot soldiers. Most were picked up in U.S. anti-terrorism sweeps in Afghanistan following the attacks of two years ago. The court combined the menâs appeals and will hear the consolidated case sometime next year. Lower courts had found that the American civilian court system did not have authority to hear the menâs complaints about their treatment. "The United States has created a prison on Guantanamo Bay that operates entirely outside the law," lawyers for British and Australian detainees argued in asking the high court to take the case. "Within the walls of this prison, foreign nationals may be held indefinitely, without charges or evidence of wrongdoing, without access to family, friends or legal counsel, and with no opportunity to establish their innocence," they maintained. Also Monday, the high court refused to hear another appeal dealing with the U.S. government anti-terrorism campaign. The court did not comment in rejecting an appeal from an Islamic charity whose assets were impounded three months after the terrorist attacks. The Global Relief Foundation argued that the government put it out of business without proof that the Illinois-based charity was funneling money to terrorists. Since the attacks, the United States and other governments have frozen the assets of several groups they claim assist groups like Al Qaeda. Global Relief has not been charged with a terror-related crime. It has said that it provides humanitarian relief in about 20 different nations, mainly those with large Muslim populations. The case is Global Relief Foundation v. Snow, 03-46. In the Guantanamo case, the appeals come from men who do not even know about the lawsuit, lawyers from the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights told the court. The lawsuit brought on their behalf claims they are not Al Qaeda members and had no involvement in Sept. 11. The Bush administration replied that a lower federal appeals court properly looked to a Supreme Court case arising from World War II to determine that foreigners held outside the United States cannot bring the kind of court challenge at issue now. The 1950 case said German prisoners detained by the United States in China had no right to access to federal courts. The Guantanamo base is a 45-square-mile area on the southeastern tip of Cuba. The land was seized by the United States in the Spanish-American War and has been leased from Cuba for the past century. The lease far predates the communist rule of Fidel Castro. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia had rejected the detaineesâ claim that Guantanamo Bay is under the de facto control of the United States, even though it remains a part of Cuba. Solicitor General Theodore Olson, whose wife was killed aboard the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, told the court that the prisonersâ lawsuit has great "potential for interference with the core war powers of the president." President Bush has recommended that six of the Guantanamo detainees, including Australian David Hicks, be the first to face military tribunals established for the global war on terror. Hicks also is among the inmates named in the appeals. He was captured while allegedly fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Many of the inmates have spent nearly two years in confinement.
| |
Link |
Home Front |
Barbara Olson buried |
2001-09-15 |
At this morning's memorial service for Barbara K. Olson, who died Tuesday when American Airlines flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, a priest reached into scripture for something familiar a Bible story. He did so as he recounted the now-familiar story of the telephone calls Olson, 45, a lawyer and prominent commentator, made to her husband, U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson, to tell him her plane had been hijacked. Theodore Olson was powerless to stop events from unfolding. |
Link |