Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
'The Stalin Affair': How Borders Were Drawn Along Former Russian Outskirts
2025-05-14
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Daniil Pelymov

[REGNUM] One hundred years ago, on May 13, 1925, the III All-Union Congress of Soviets unanimously decided to include two new republics into the Soviet Union - the Uzbek SSR and the Turkmen SSR. But this was not an expansion of borders.

Later, in 1939-1940, the number of union republics and the size of two of them expanded along with the state's borders (the annexation of Western Ukraine, Western Belarus, the Baltics and Bessarabia). But that was still a long way off.

And in 1925, there was talk of “redevelopment with the transfer of walls” within the recently established USSR. The Soviet government, on the orders of the ruling All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), redrew the borders in the sands and oases of Turkestan.

This was done in fulfillment of Lenin’s principles of national policy, which were based on the right of nations to self-determination, including secession, as well as “indigenization,” that is, the implantation of the languages ​​of the titular peoples, and the creation (sometimes from scratch) of national elites.

Those who, against the backdrop of the war with the Basmachi, drew the administrative borders of the Central Asian republics, of course, did not predict that 65 years later the country would disintegrate along these borders. That the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st century would be marked by new civil wars, uprisings (similar to the Andijan rebellion of 2005), the death and exodus of the “alien population” – the Russians.

And that “low-intensity conflicts” will regularly flare up on the borders of the former fraternal republics.

TO THE BORDERS OF THE 17TH CENTURY
At first glance, to understand the scale of national-territorial demarcation, it is enough to look at two maps of Soviet Central Asia.

Until 1925, the territory of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic (as the abbreviation RSFSR was then deciphered) extended to the borders with Persia and Afghanistan. Within the RSFSR were the Kirghiz (Kazakh) ASSR with its center in Orenburg and the Turkestan ASSR with its center in Tashkent.

Two people's Soviet republics were included in the territory of the Russian Federation: the Khorezm People's Soviet Republic, created on the site of the Khiva Khanate occupied by the Bolsheviks, and the Bukhara People's Soviet Republic, organized, accordingly, on the territory of the former Bukhara Emirate.

After the territorial demarcation, Orenburg was "withdrawn" from the Kazakh ASSR, whose capital moved to the city of Perovsk (renamed then to Kzyl-Orda, or - translated from Kazakh - Krasnoarmeysk). To the south of the Kazakh Autonomous Republic, two autonomous regions were allocated - Karakalpak and Kara-Kyrgyz. For now, part of the RSFSR.

Eleven years later, in 1936, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan went from being autonomous regions to full-fledged union republics, and the Russian border acquired its current form, roughly corresponding to the borders of the Russian kingdom in the first half of the 17th century.

But in order to appreciate the significance of this shift in the administrative boundaries of the union republics, it is necessary to briefly recall how Russia moved to the southeast from the end of the 16th to the beginning of the 20th century.

SEMEY AND PETROPAVL
In the last year of Ivan the Terrible's life, in 1584, several hundred Don and Lower Volga Cossacks marched east and occupied the lands of the Nogai Khans along the Yaik River. The history of the Yaik Cossack Host began from that moment. After the suppression of the Pugachev rebellion in 1775, the Yaik Host was renamed the Ural Host, and the military capital, Yaitsky Gorodok, founded in the same 1584, was named Uralsk. This city, which retained its historical name, is the oldest in the European part of independent Kazakhstan.

During the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich, in 1640, the merchant Guriy Nazaryev built a fort at the mouth of the Yaik River into the Caspian Sea - the city of Guryev that arose here bore this name until 1991. Now it is the regional center of Atyrau.

Under Peter the Great, in 1718, a detachment of the voivode Vasily Cheredov built the Semipalatnaya fortress in the southern Siberian steppe near the Irtysh, around which the city of Semipalatinsk (now Semey in Kazakhstan) arose. In those same years, in the same place, in the Irtysh region, the Cossacks built the Koryakovsky outpost, where a village of the same name would later arise, which in the 19th century became a city named Pavlodar.

In 1720, by decree of Peter I, the "capital" of Rudny Altai, the fortress of Ust-Kamenogorsk, was founded to strengthen the borders of the Russian state and explore gold veins in the upper reaches of the Irtysh. It is still known as the city of Ust-Kamenogorsk (now the center of the East Kazakhstan region).

Simultaneously with the advancement of the Russian Tsardom, and then the Russian Empire, into the steppe, there was also a counter movement.

In 1731, the Chingizid Abulkhair, khan of the Younger Zhuz (a Kazakh tribal union that roamed from the Southern Urals to the Syr Darya), asked for Russian citizenship, counting on help in the fight against the Dzungar Khanate. Abulkhair and the heads of 27 clans swore allegiance to Empress Anna Ioannovna on the Koran.

But even after this, the southeastern steppes remained permeable to raids on the Russian frontier by slave traders from three Central Asian states, fragments of Tamerlane’s empire – from Bukhara, Khiva and the Kokand Khanate.

Under Elizabeth Petrovna and Catherine the Great, fortified lines were built to protect against the nomadic Dzungars and Kyrgyz-Kaisaks of the Middle Zhuz: the Tobolsk-Ishim and Irtysh lines, from Tomsk and Omsk through Ust-Kamenogorsk to Semipalatinsk. A logical continuation were the defensive lines in the steppes near Orenburg, founded in 1730.

Note that in the first half of the 18th century, with a difference of 12 years, the empire founded two outposts with the same name - Petropavlovsk: on Kamchatka and on the bank of the Irtysh tributary, the Ishim River. In modern Kazakhstani documentation, this city is called Petropavl.

At the beginning of the 19th century, on the frontier from the lower reaches of the Yaik-Ural to Altai, on the lands of the Orenburg and Siberian Cossack troops, there were 46 fortresses and 96 redoubts. But the logic of history prompted the empire to move further south.

OUTRUN THE LION
In the early 1820s, the Kokand Khan carried out a devastating raid on the Kazakh nomad camps. At the same time, the ruler of the Middle Zhuz, Vali Khan, transferred his subjects under the protection of Russia. According to the "Charter on the Siberian Kirghiz" developed under Alexander I, the Kazakhs were introduced to Russian-style governance and legal proceedings. A little later, in 1830, the Cossack outpost of Akmolinsk appeared on the Ishim River, which, after changing many names, became the capital of Kazakhstan - Astana.

In 1839–1840, Russia organized its first campaign against Khiva, the center of the slave trade in Central Asia. Vasily Perovsky’s expedition was unsuccessful, but it was only the beginning of counterattacks in response to the raids.

It was no longer just a matter of protecting villages, peasant settlers and "peaceful foreigners" who had sworn allegiance to Russia, but also of the great game that had begun between two empires, the Russian and the British. The Chinese Qing Empire also laid claim to Central Asia, but its forces were incomparable with the might of the "bear" and the "lion".

The empire was forced to move further, relying on new southern outposts such as Lepsinsk (founded in 1846), the Perovsk fort (Kzyl-Orda) built in 1853, the Vernoye fortification built a year later (also known as the Cossack village of Vernaya, the city of Verny), and, finally, the southern capital of Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata.

In 1865, General Mikhail Chernyaev took Tashkent by storm, which became the main stronghold in the region. Cossacks of the new Semirechye army (with its center in Verny) and settlers from Central Russia rushed here. Thus, in 1868, peasants from the Penza, Samara, Voronezh and Tambov provinces founded the settlement of Pishpek (now the capital of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek) near the Verny tract. Only later did the Sarts join the Great Russians - sedentary Turks from Tashkent and the centers of the Fergana Valley: Namangan, Kokand and others.

The imperial government abolished the remainder of the Kokand Khanate in 1876. In response to a series of uprisings, troops under the command of the "white general", the future hero of the Russo-Turkish War Mikhail Skobelev, entered the Khan's headquarters. The Russians began to develop the former Kokand lands much earlier. So much so that already in 1869 Mikhail Saltykov-Shchedrin could satirically describe the " Tashkent gentlemen " - officials in the newly annexed territories.

"WHO BUILDS SCHOOLS, BUILDS THE FUTURE"
Events in the Khanate of Khiva and the Emirate of Bukhara developed somewhat differently. In 1866, in the battles of Irdjai and Chapan-Ata, the troops of Adjutant General Konstantin Kaufman routed the army of the Emir of Bukhara, Muzaffar. Two years later, Samarkand was captured. In all cases, Russian soldiers released slaves. In 1868, the Emir of Bukhara concluded an agreement with Russia: the ruler of the faithful retained the throne, but Russia received the right to station garrisons and determine foreign policy. The territories from the Pamirs to the middle reaches of the Amu Darya were no longer in danger of becoming another pearl of the British crown.

A similar fate awaited the Khiva Khanate. After a quick campaign in 1873, Kaufman signed a treaty with Khan Seid Muhammad Rahim II : Khiva freed the slaves and transferred most of its possessions to Russian Turkestan.

In the late 1870s and early 1880s, it was time to "pacify" the warlike Turkmens (some of whom were vassals of Khiva). The port of Krasnovodsk on the Caspian Sea, now called Turkmenbashi, was founded in 1869 by the expedition of General and scientist-geographer Nikolai Stoletov. And since the 1880s, the border village of Askhabad has turned into a fast-growing city, the center of the Trans-Caspian region.

At the same time, "soft power" was taking root in the vassal states. "Whoever builds schools in Bukhara, builds the future" - so said the participant of the Central Asian campaigns, artist Vasily Vereshchagin.
Always.
At the end of the 19th century, with the demarcation of the borders in the Pamirs, the "Great Game" in Central Asia seemed to be won by Russia. According to the 1897 census, of the 7 million 746 thousand inhabitants of Turkestan (present-day Central and Southern Kazakhstan and Central Asia), 770 thousand were Russian-speaking - Great Russians, Little Russians, Belarusians, Poles and Germans.

By 1913, the settlers were cultivating the fields of Semirechye and Fergana, working in the mines of Rudny Altai and in the oil fields of the Ural-Embinsky region, and working on the Trans-Caspian, Semirechye, and Altai railways (the last two lines would serve as the basis for the Soviet Turksib). One of the elements of Pyotr Stolypin's agrarian reform was the project to resettle 100,000 peasants from the central provinces to Turkestan.

ANOTHER "BALKANS"
As for the indigenous population, the situation was almost as confusing as the infamous ethnic patchwork in the Balkans.

Under the rule of the rulers of Bukhara and Khiva and in Russian Turkestan lived the Turkic-speaking Uzbeks and "Kipchaks" (as the ruling class called themselves), Turkmens and Karakalpaks close to the Kazakhs. But in the same Bukhara and Samarkand lived many who spoke Persian and called themselves Tajiks. Often people who spoke different languages ​​settled in different quarters of the same city. This was the case, for example, in the settlement of Dushanbe-Kurgan, the current capital of Tajikistan.

The ethnonyms were not established either - the Kazakh zhuzes were called Kyrgyz and Kyrgyz-Kaisaks for a long time, and the modern Kyrgyz ethnic group was called Kara-Kirghiz. It was quite complicated with the above-mentioned Sarts, who simply spoke "Turkic", but often had Persian roots.

And this ethnic diversity, after the upheavals of the civil war and the “march of Soviet power,” had to be territorially demarcated.

According to a number of authors, the civil strife in Central Asia lasted not from 1918 to 1922, but from 1916 (a series of uprisings of the local population against mobilization for rear work, the Russian administration and settlers) until the suppression of organized Basmachi by the end of the 1930s.

The history of the civil war in Turkestan requires a detailed description. Let us just note that, for example, the Fergana Peasant Army under the command of Konstantin Monstrov, a migrant from Syzran, managed to fight for both the Reds and Kolchak's forces. Both times against the Basmachi, who were slaughtering settlers.

And the former leader of the Young Turks, Enver Pasha, who had moved to Turkestan, first acted on the side of the Red Army as an emissary of the People's Commissariat of Foreign Affairs of the RSFSR to combat the Basmachi, and soon as a kurbashi (general) of the Basmachi with the blessing of the Emir of Bukhara. But in all cases, this nationalist pan-Turkist acted against the settlers. "Things are going the way I wanted... Many Russians were killed," Enver reported in 1921.

"THERE WAS A FIERCE STRUGGLE"
Despite all the confusion “on the ground,” the Soviet government steadfastly followed the general line formulated in Vladimir Lenin’s letter to the communists of Turkestan in November 1919: “Make every effort to prove… the sincerity of our desire to eradicate all traces of Great Russian imperialism.”

As in other outskirts of the former empire, the party in the 1920s relied on the nationally minded intelligentsia. In the case of Bukhara and Khiva, this was the left wing of the Jadids (“enlighteners,” nationalists, and Islamic modernists), who, in particular, proposed using the original Turkic ethnonym “Uzbek” instead of the word of unclear origin “Sart.”

In 1920, under the supervision of Mikhail Frunze and his troops, "revolutions" took place in the multi-ethnic Bukhara and Khiva. But the overthrow of the emir and khan and the creation of republics under flags with a crescent, star, sickle and hammer were only an interim solution. Then it was time for "national building".

As Vyacheslav Molotov recalled at the end of his life, the implementation of Lenin’s national policy in Central Asia was entirely the merit of the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) Joseph Stalin, as a great specialist in nationality affairs (and the People’s Commissar for the field in 1917–1923).

"The creation of the Central Asian republics and the border was entirely Stalin's work. There was a fierce struggle. The Kazakhs, for example, their top brass, fought for Tashkent, wanted it to be their capital... Stalin gathered them... looked at the borders and said: Tashkent to the Uzbeks, and Verny, Alma-Ata to the Kazakhs," Molotov said. An equally difficult task was how to divide the Khorezm oasis between the new national states, the Uzbek and Turkmen SSRs. Or how to divide the Fergana Valley between Uzbekistan and the Kara-Kyrgyz Autonomous Region, still part of the Russian Federal Republic.

However, as recent history has shown, the “filigree” of national borders with enclaves and semi-enclaves did not protect against ethnic cleansing (for example, the massacre in Osh, Kyrgyzstan, in 1990) or border conflicts in the 2020s.

The fact that the city of Skobelev (Fergana) should go to Uzbekistan, Krasnovodsk to Turkmenistan, and Przhevalsk (modern name Karakol) to Kyrgyzstan, did not raise any questions in 1925. It is also not surprising that, in fulfillment of the “desire to eradicate traces of Great Russian chauvinism,” the Kazakh ASSR with its capital in Orenburg included cities of the former Ural, Omsk and Semipalatinsk regions of the Russian Empire.

As is known, in the discussions of 1922 on the principles of creating the Soviet state, "People's Commissariat of Nationalities" Stalin defended the plan of autonomization. National formations were to become a garland of autonomies around the Russian SFSR without the right to secede.

But - again, as is well known - in Moscow in 1922, the Leninist approach of creating equal Soviet states (as the core of the communist " United States of the World ") with the right of each national republic to secession prevailed. Stalin accepted this principle and continued to adhere to it in the 1930s and 1940s, when creating new SSRs - Kazakh, Kirghiz, Tajik and others.

The Central Asian countries that emerged in 1991 within the administrative borders drawn in 1925 have emerged as national states with which modern Russia maintains friendly and, in some cases, allied relations. But for the fact that in the 1990s Russians and other “non-titular peoples” who had lived here for generations found themselves in the position of unwanted migrants, one cannot help but say “thank you” to the creators of Lenin’s national policy.

Link


Home Front: WoT
US deports over 130 Central Asian Migrants to Uzbekistan
2025-05-02
[KhaamaPress] The U.S. deported 131 migrants colonists from Central Asia to Uzbekistan under a new agreement to enhance security and legal cooperation.

The United States has deported 131 Central Asian migrants colonists who were residing in the country illegally. The deportees, originally from Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan, were returned to Uzbekistan on a chartered flight, according to a Rooters report published on April 30.

The move comes under a new agreement between Washington and Tashkent aimed at improving cooperation on migration management and border security. The repatriation was carried out in coordination with Uzbekistan’s authorities, ensuring adherence to international protocols.

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem stated that Washington seeks to continue its collaboration with Uzbekistan to strengthen mutual security and uphold the rule of law. She emphasized the importance of bilateral partnerships in addressing cross-border challenges.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security confirmed that the deportation was part of broader efforts to enforce immigration law and enhance domestic security. The operation reflects the government’s ongoing commitment to address undocumented migration.

This deportation aligns with longstanding policy goals dating back to the administration of the U.S. President Donald Trump
...Never got invited to a P.Diddy party...
, who had pledged to remove millions of undocumented migrants colonists from the country. Current enforcement actions build on that legacy with increased focus on strategic international cooperation.

As global migration pressures rise, such coordinated repatriations underscore the increasing focus on legal migration pathways and border enforcement among destination countries. The U.S. continues to work with regional partners to manage irregular migration while adhering to human rights
One man's rights are another man's existential threat.
standards.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, future deportation operations will continue under similar bilateral agreements, especially with Central Asian and Latin American countries. Washington emphasizes that these efforts aim to deter unlawful entry while supporting regional stability and cooperation.
Link


India-Pakistan
Can India and Pakistan Back Away From the Abyss of Nuclear War?
2025-04-29
It seems to me that India already has, and Pakistan prefers to continue using their jihadi proxies, even though they aren’t fooling anyone.
[RedState] India and Pakistain seem to move inexorably toward war as rhetoric and retaliatory action were ratcheted up since a bloody massacre of 26 people by the Pakistain-sponsored group called Kashmir
...a disputed territory lying between India and Pakistain. After partition, the Paks grabbed half of it and call it Azad (Free) Kashmir. The remainder they refer to as "Indian Occupied Kashmir". They have fought four wars with India over it, the score currently 4-0 in New Delhi's favor. After 72 years of this nonsense, India cut the Gordian knot in 2019, removing the area's special status, breaking off Ladakh as a separate state, and allowing people from other areas to settle (or in the case of the Pandits, to resettle) there....
Resistance® on Tuesday; see Terror in India: Attack Leaves Dozens Dead During JD Vance's Visit — RedState. This is not the first terror attack in Kashmir, but this one was in a tourist spot, and eyewitness reports say that the button men singled out non-Moslems for execution.

Here's the state of play.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has vowed vengeance. In a rally, he said, "I say to the whole world: India will identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backers." The backers are, of course, Pakistain's intelligence and military apparatus.

Both countries have ordered visa holders from the other to leave immediately. Both sides have expelled diplomats, but there hasn't been an official break in diplomatic relations. Pakistain had suspended all trade with India and put Pak airspace off limits to Indian aircraft.

The nightly "Beating Retreat" ceremony at the Attari-Wagah border crossing is supposed to end with the gate up and a handshake. That has been suspended.

The cut point came on Thursday when India cut off Pakistain's supply of fresh water and announced it was reconsidering the Indus Waters Treaty.

That drew the expected response from Pakistain. Here is a member of parliament, Bilawal Baby Bhutto Zardari
...Pak dynastic politician, son of Benazir Bhutto and grandon of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. As far as is known, Bilawal has no particular talents other than being pretty and being able to memorize political slogans, but he had the good luck to be born into the right family and he hasn't been assassinated yet...
, telling a rally, "I would like to stand here in Sukkur by the Indus and tell India that the Indus is ours and the Indus will remain ours, whether water flows in this Indus or their blood."

India's lone carrier, the INS Vikrant, has sortied to the Arabian Sea.

But, like the Grand Old Duke of York, it soon returned to port, allegedly due to a fire in one of its galleys.

India and Pakistain have fought four wars.

  • First Indo-Pakistan War (1947-1948): Fought over Jammu and Kashmir after Pakistan-supported tribal militias invaded, leading to the accession of Kashmir to India. Ended with a UN-brokered ceasefire, establishing the Line of Control (LoC).

  • Second Indo-Pakistan War (1965): Sparked by Pakistan's Operation Gibraltar, aiming to infiltrate Jammu and Kashmir. Large-scale battles followed, ending with a UN-mandated ceasefire and the Tashkent Agreement. No significant territorial changes took place.

  • Third Indo-Pakistan War (1971): Centered on East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). India intervened in support of Bengali rebels, leading to Pakistan's surrender and Bangladesh's independence. The Simla Agreement followed in 1972.

  • Kargil War (1999): Pakistan infiltrated the Indian-administered Kargil in Jammu and Kashmir. India launched Operation Vijay, reclaiming the territory after intense fighting. No formal peace treaty was negotiated.

If war breaks out, it is hard to see how this ends well for anyone. Pakistan is not a match for India in conventional warfare, but both nations have nuclear weapons. Pakistan is estimated to have 170 warheads, and India is thought to have 172. Pakistan reserves the right to use nuclear weapons first in a conflict; India's policy is that it will only use nuclear weapons if it is attacked with them. This virtually ensures any war turns nuclear, as it is difficult to see how Pakistan's Army holds off a determined effort by India and would have to go nuclear to prevent a catastrophic defeat. Adding to the uncertainty, Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is heavily focused on tactical nuclear weapons while India's is not. This could lead Pakistan to believe it could use battlefield nukes and not risk a disproportionate nuclear response.
Link


Afghanistan
No More Terrorists: Why Russia Needs Afghanistan and the Taliban
2025-04-23
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Leonid Savin

[REGNUM] On April 7, at the request of the Prosecutor General's Office, the Supreme Court of Russia excluded the Afghan Taliban movement from the list of terrorist organizations. What will now change in Russia's relations with Afghanistan?

Islamic Emirate spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said : "We consider this step very important. In the future, Afghanistan and Russia will certainly establish good relations in the economic and diplomatic spheres. The Russian President is pursuing the right policy towards Afghanistan."
Right, until the Al Qaeda-linked jihadi groups supported and protected by the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (Taliban) government hook up with their counterparts in Russia and start causing trouble; you go on feeling smug about putting one over on the West until then, guys. But when the next Beslan or Crocus City Hall mass attack happens, don’t come crying to us. Ditto for India, except about being smug — they think of thrmselves as pragmatically managing the Talibs, just like the Israelis were doing with Hamas until 10/7.
The news was long expected: Taliban delegations, despite their “forbidden status,” had previously regularly visited Russia to participate in all sorts of forums and meetings at a high political level.

Therefore, the formal recognition of the Taliban as a political force, just like the various ruling parties in other countries, acting within the framework of their sovereignty and deciding issues of their state and society, was only a matter of time.

And if we look at it from the pragmatic position of Russian interests, this time was lost. Since practically immediately after the expulsion of the US occupation forces, other major players quickly began working in Afghanistan, considering it as a promising place for the implementation of all sorts of projects.

For example, Chinese companies are already actively developing mineral deposits in Afghanistan. Oil and gas giant CAPEIC signed a 25-year oil production contract with the Taliban in early 2023, under which it will invest $150 million annually in the Afghan economy.

Iran is also actively developing cooperation, since it has a long border with Afghanistan, and Iran’s seaports are needed by Afghanistan for import-export operations.

TRANSPORT ROUTES
It is significant that just before the decision to change the status of the Taliban, a high-level Russian government delegation visited Afghanistan and met with the Taliban, in particular with the Minister of Public Works Ashraf Khakshenas.

It is known that, in addition to general issues of expanding economic and trade cooperation, the discussions included repairing the tunnel on the Salang Highway, building new tunnels in mountainous areas, and developing the Afghan railway network with the supply of relevant components and necessary equipment.

Meanwhile, Kazakhstan has also shown interest in building railways, and the Afghan side has confirmed that it is interested in expanding ties with the Central Asian republics. And earlier, it was Kazakhstan that openly proposed removing the Taliban movement's status as a terrorist organization.

As for the Taliban's own interests, the Islamic Emirate plans to expand its railway network from Hairatan to Herat, and from there to Kandahar and Spin Boldak. This will connect Central Asia with South Asia, as well as Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran and Pakistan.

In general, the Taliban want to reduce Afghanistan's economic dependence on Iran and Pakistan. They currently use trade routes through these countries to organize imports and exports. Amajry part of Afghan commercial goods are transported from these countries to China.

Some neighboring countries use Afghanistan's trade dependence as a political tool, blocking trade routes during harvest time, for example, causing Afghan farmers millions of dollars in losses.

The Taliban's railway project is part of a broader plan to connect Afghanistan to China and Russia via Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. The new road would reduce Afghanistan's dependence on its neighbors while making the trade route faster and more cost-effective.

Currently, Afghan goods transported via Iran and Pakistan take at least 40 days to reach China, while the new route will reduce this time to 12-15 days. In addition, transportation costs will be reduced by 15-20%.

The Trans-Afghan Railway project, which will connect Pakistan and Uzbekistan, has been around for a long time. Back in February 2021, the three countries signed a roadmap in Tashkent for the construction of the Termez-Mazar-i-Sharif-Kabul-Peshawar railway. After the change of power in Afghanistan, the Taliban also supported this initiative.

Using new logistics opportunities, Kazakhstan joined the work on the route through Afghanistan in 2024. But for now, cargo is transported by car through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the port in Karachi. After the railway line is put into operation, delivery will be significantly simplified.

In November 2024, at the international forum "Transport of Russia", it was announced that "the multimodal North-South route to Iran will be expanded by the eastern branch through Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to Afghanistan. Then the route will go to the ports of Pakistan or India."

RUSSIAN INTEREST
In addition to cooperation with Afghanistan in the field of infrastructure projects, the extraction of various minerals seems promising. It was Soviet geologists who conducted research in this country in the 50s-70s, that is, even before the introduction of Soviet troops.

Last year, the research resumed and showed good results. It was noted that the samples of precious and rare earth metals showed an excess of the forecast. The Afghans have silver, gold, platinum, palladium, lithium, tantalum, niobium, cesium, rubidium, beryllium, cadmium in abundance...

Therefore, participation in the local mining industry may be quite attractive and promising for Russia.

Moreover, with the changing situation, energy cooperation also looks quite attractive.

In addition to the long-standing unrealized TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) gas pipeline project, there was also a gas pipeline project from Iran to Pakistan. But Islamabad suspended construction of its section due to force majeure.

Given the agreement between Russia and Iran on swap supplies, energy cooperation would also be useful for Moscow. Although in strategic planning, it is probably necessary to think about its own branches of gas and oil pipelines towards energy-vulnerable Pakistan via Afghanistan.

To this can be added the CASA-1000 energy network project for Central Asia, as well as the possibility of building nuclear reactors in the future.

In addition, cooperation between our countries in the field of security is of great importance.

On April 21, 2025, at an international conference in Baku, Director of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service Sergei Naryshkin stated : “We are all aware of the important place of Afghanistan in the geopolitics of Greater Eurasia. This country has enormous potential as a link between the north and south, east and west of the continent. It is in the common interests of our states to promote restoration and prosperity on Afghan soil.”

And he added: “The information coming into the SVR allows us to say with confidence that the main problem is the desire of Western countries to maintain instability in Afghanistan in order to solve their own selfish geopolitical tasks. It is to Western, most often British, intelligence services that the threads of the terrorist attacks of the so-called “Vilayat Khorasan” * are drawn.

The terrorist organization in question is a local branch of ISIS*, which attracts those who are upset with the Taliban. The problem is that there is a kind of Pashtun nationalism within the Taliban, and for this reason, members of other ethnic groups who are prone to radicalization are readily recruited by ISIS*.

And then there are both terrorist attacks inside Afghanistan and their planning beyond its borders. And given the revealed connections with Western intelligence services, this factor seems extremely important.

Meanwhile, the “legal fork” still remains due to the fact that the UN continues to view the Taliban as an organization guilty of violating human rights, especially discrimination against women and religious minorities, in particular the country’s Shiite community.

Thus, the press secretary of the UN Secretary-General Stephane Dujarric, after Russia removed the Taliban movement from the list of terrorist organizations, stated that “this is a sovereign decision of the Russian Federation, the status of the Taliban movement in the UN, established by member states, remains unchanged.”

The Russian Foreign Ministry clarified that this step does not change Moscow’s commitment to UN Security Council sanctions against individuals and legal entities associated with the Islamic Emirate.

But the aforementioned sanctions are unlikely to be an obstacle to economic cooperation, since both Moscow and Kabul have learned to circumvent them using various mechanisms.

Link


Arabia
UAE thanks Turkey for help apprehending suspects in murder of Chabad rabbi
2024-11-27
[IsraelTimes] UAE’s foreign ministry confirms Ankara’s involvement, but does not provide details on how it helped or where the suspects were when they were caught

The United Arab Emirates foreign ministry announced on Tuesday that Ottoman Turkish authorities assisted in the arrest of the suspects accused of murdering an Israeli rabbi in the UAE last week.

In a statement carried by the state news agency, the ministry thanked Ottoman Turkish authorities for "their cooperation in arresting the perpetrators," without providing further details.

Emirati authorities have said they arrested three Uzbek men for the suspected murder of Zvi Kogan, a 28-year-old rabbi who had been living in the UAE and was also a Moldovan national.

The circumstances of Kogan’s death have not been disclosed and it is unclear if Emirati authorities have established a motive or where the three suspects were when they were arrested.

Israeli officials have said Kogan was targeted because he was Jewish and branded his killing as an antisemitic terror attack. Israeli agencies are assisting in the investigation.

Kogan had been living in the UAE for several years and had been involved in outreach to the country’s Jewish community. He was reported missing on Thursday and his body was discovered on Sunday.

Uzbek officials have said the Tashkent government was assisting the Emirati and Israeli authorities in the investigation.

Two of the detained suspects are aged 28 and a third is 33. The three suspects have been shown blindfolded and in restraints in images released by the UAE Interior Ministry.
More from the Times of Israel:
According to a senior Turkish official, once the UAE determined that the three Uzbek suspects had fled the country, they turned to Turkey for help.

“The Turkish intelligence determined the flight taken by the individuals and executed all subsequent steps with utmost secrecy to avoid raising suspicion,” says the official.

The suspects landed in Istanbul, according to the Turkish official, but police allowed the suspects to leave the terminal and take a taxi in order to reduce the potential for a fight. The police and MIT followed the vehicle, which eventually reached a police checkpoint. The suspects were taken into custody there, then deported to the UAE.

“The Republic of Türkiye remains steadfast in its efforts to prevent criminals from remaining within its borders as part of its broader counter-terrorism initiatives,” says the official.
Related:
Zvi Kogan 11/25/2024 UAE arrests three suspects in killing of Israeli-Moldovan rabbi
Zvi Kogan 11/24/2024 Chabad rabbi missing in Abu Dhabi, feared kidnapped or murdered; UPDATE: missing rabbi’s body found

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Military response to the West and diplomacy in the East. Putin's four key points
2024-05-30
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Gevorg Mirzayan

[REGNUM] Following his visit to Uzbekistan, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a press conference, where he spoke not only about the Eurasian prospects of Tashkent, but also about the legitimate leader of Ukraine, the consequences of Western weapons strikes on Russian territory and the future of relations between Russia and the Taliban (the organization whose activities banned in the Russian Federation, is under UN sanctions for terrorist activities).

First of all, Putin made it clear what awaits Uzbekistan in the Eurasian Union. According to him, if the economy of this country joins the unification, the Union will only benefit from this. But the Uzbek economy also needs to benefit. In general, the president noted, this is “a rather complex negotiation process.”

Now Uzbekistan is one of the most obvious candidates in expanding Eurasian integration, says Nikita Mendkovich, head of the Eurasian Analytical Club. He recalls that even before the start of the SVO, Tashkent set in its official strategies the task of joining the process; local legislation was being adapted to the norms of the Eurasian Union.

“Yes, our acute conflict with the West delayed this process. Now Tashkent, like many external players, is waiting to see who will take it. After our victory in Ukraine, the process of joining the Eurasian Union will most likely resume, as well as the process of returning Tashkent to the ranks of the CSTO member countries,” predicts Mendkovich in a commentary for IA Regnum.

LEGITIMATE AUTHORITIES OF UKRAINE
It turned out that Vladimir Putin understands the Ukrainian constitution and legislation much better than a number of Verkhovna Rada deputies, and certainly better than the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky. This conclusion can be drawn after the Russian president’s explanations about the legitimacy of the Ukrainian authorities.

Putin noted that the absence of presidential elections does not mean that Zelensky retains the post of president of the country indefinitely. Yes, the principle of continuity of power must be preserved, but according to the law it passes to another person. The head of the Russian state said that, according to a preliminary assessment, “the only legitimate authorities remain the parliament and the speaker of the Rada.” In fact, the head of the Rada, Ruslan Stefanchuk, becomes acting. O. president.

The speaker himself has already reacted: he said that Vladimir Zelensky is the president of Ukraine until the next elections, that is, he expressed humility and disowned the Ukrainian opposition.

“ Stefanchuk, of course, is absolutely a man of Zelensky and his team. And he understands that if something happens, he can be quickly removed from the post of speaker,” explains Vladimir Kornilov, political observer of the Rossiya Segodnya media group, to IA Regnum.

At the same time, he points out, the speaker ignored Putin’s words that the Constitution of Ukraine does not provide for the abolition of presidential elections during martial law. So Stefanchuk is clearly playing his game and may yet unpleasantly surprise Zelensky at the decisive moment, Kornilov believes.

RESPONSE TO ATTACKS ON RUSSIA
Putin also addressed Western politicians who are now discussing the possibility of giving the Kyiv regime permission to use its weapons to strike Russia, while emphasizing that they supposedly have nothing to do with the strikes - the weapons, after being transferred to Kyiv, become Ukrainian.

“ There are no German weapons in Ukraine. There are Ukrainian weapons of German origin, and these are completely different circumstances,” argued, for example, back in July 2023, representative of the German Ministry of Defense Arne Collatz.

But, according to President Putin, striking deep into Russian territory with new Ukrainian weapons is impossible without direct Western participation.

“ High-precision long-range weapons cannot be used without space reconnaissance assets - this is the first thing. Second: the final choice of target and the so-called flight mission can only be made by highly qualified specialists based on this intelligence data, technical intelligence data,” the president said.

Obviously, Putin had in mind the Western military. At the same time, he also transparently hinted that in response, Western countries risk receiving blows from the Russian army.

“These representatives of NATO countries, especially in Europe, especially in small countries, must be aware of what they are playing with. They must remember that these are, as a rule, states with a small territory and a very dense population. And this is a factor that they should keep in mind before talking about launching strikes deep into Russian territory,” the head of state said.

The main question: will the West hear the Russian leader? Associate Professor of the Russian State University for the Humanities Vadim Trukhachev is sure that no.

“ NATO and the EU will not listen to these words. Also because they are confident that Russia will not cause them any harm,” Trukhachev told IA Regnum, admitting that Moscow will have to go for further escalation.

AFGHAN ADVANCE
But in other regions, Russia itself is promoting the idea of ​​de-escalation and cooperation. For example, in Afghanistan. President Putin admitted that there are problems there, but it is necessary to build relations with the current Afghan government.

“ These are the people who control the country, control the territory of the country, they are the power in Afghanistan today. We must proceed from reality and build relationships accordingly,” the president noted.

Considering recent statements by representatives of the Russian Foreign Ministry, who recommended Moscow to exclude the Taliban from the list of terrorist organizations, many regarded Putin’s statement as a pretext not only for exclusion, but also for the establishment of diplomatic relations with the Taliban regime.

Ever since they came to power after the Americans fled there, the prospects for this normalization were linked to two official and one unofficial conditions. The first category includes the Taliban’s fight against jihadist terrorist groups entrenched in Afghanistan, as well as stopping attempts to import Afghan heroin into Russia through the countries of Central Asia. The Taliban have fulfilled both of these conditions: they are destroying terrorists, and as of 2023, they were able, according to the UN, to reduce opium poppy cultivation in the country by almost 95%.

The informal condition is the synchronization of recognition with Russian allies - China and Central Asian countries, for which the Taliban should also not pose a threat.

Judging by the words of the Russian president, as well as the place where he said them, this condition has also been met.

“Perhaps Moscow and Tashkent received serious security guarantees and the opportunity to implement transit projects through the territory of Afghanistan. Somehow, the Taliban convinced the Russian Foreign Ministry that we would be able to transit to the Indian Ocean coast through Uzbekistan and Afghanistan. Enter new markets, including gas, and the Taliban will guarantee the safety of this project,” says expert Mendkovich.

And if the Taliban has fulfilled all the conditions, gives guarantees and is ready to cooperate, then Russia will keep its word.

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
150 migrants received summonses to the military registration and enlistment office during raids in the Rostov region
2024-04-10
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[KavkazUzel] Inspections were carried out in fast food restaurants in Rostov-on-Don and in logistics centers of large marketplaces in the region.
During the Revolutionary period, wasn’t one of the American objections to British navy press gangs?
Law enforcement officers were looking for migrants who had received Russian citizenship and had not registered with the military. 150 such migrants were issued summonses to the military registration and enlistment office. The raids took place in fast food restaurants on Voroshilovsky Prospekt, as well as in four logistics centers of large marketplaces located in the Lenin village of the Aksai district, the military investigative department of the Investigative Committee for the Southern Military District reported.

A total of 913 people were checked, of which 545 were citizens of the Russian Federation. In addition, as a result of these checks, 39 people were brought to administrative responsibility, of which 25 were foreign citizens, Interfax writes with reference to the department’s press service.

Previously, checks were carried out in a crowded area of ​​citizens engaged in private transportation on Oganova Street in Rostov-on-Don, as well as in the private sector in the area of ​​Tashkentskaya Street, the agency writes.

The "Caucasian Knot" previously wrote that as a result of raids by security forces after the terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall, 30 migrants in Krasnodar, 87 people in the Volgograd region, 46 citizens of Central Asia in the Rostov region, seven citizens of Uzbekistan in Ingushetia and a group foreign students in Astrakhan, follows from the reports of security officials.

Link


India-Pakistan
Iran and Pakistan exchanged missile strikes. What to expect next
2024-01-19
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kirill Semeno

[REGNUM] On January 18, Islamabad said its forces had launched "a series of well-coordinated and targeted precision military strikes" against Iran's southeastern Sistan and Baluchistan province in an operation called Marg Bar Sarmachar. This broadly translates to “death to the partisans.”

"Several" militants were killed during the operation, Pakistan's foreign ministry added.

Islamabad also noted that in recent years it has expressed concern to Tehran about “shelters and shelters” in Iran for Pakistani Baloch separatists, whom Pakistan calls “Sarmachar.” The Pakistani authorities, as they themselves claim, wanted the Iranian side to share data regarding the presence and activities of these militants.

“Sarmachar” refers to two groups, the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), that are fighting for greater regional autonomy for Pakistani Balochistan, even to the point of granting it independence from Pakistan. At the same time, their militants often commit terrorist acts and kill journalists.

ISLAMABAD'S "MIRROR RESPONSE"
Pakistan's actions are a "mirror response" to Iran's attacks on Pakistani soil two days earlier.

On Tuesday evening, January 16, Iran's IRGC forces allegedly attacked the headquarters of the Jaysh al-Adl movement in Pakistan. This group conducts its anti-government activities in the province of Sistan and Baluchistan in Iran, seeking to transform this region into an independent Islamic emirate.

The Pakistani government strongly condemned Tehran's actions and said the strikes killed two children and wounded three others.

“ What is even more alarming is that this illegal act occurred despite the existence of multiple channels of communication between Pakistan and Iran, ” the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said. “ Pakistan has always said that terrorism is a common threat to all countries in the region, which requires coordinated action.”

The Pakistani Foreign Ministry recalled the ambassador from Iran, and Islamabad stated that it reserves the right to retaliate. And, as you can see, these measures did not take long to arrive.

In turn, Tehran has now expressed protest against Pakistan’s “anti-terrorist operation” on its own territory. According to the Iranian Tasnim agency, Pakistan's charge d'affaires in Tehran was summoned to the Iranian Foreign Ministry after a missile strike on the territory of the Islamic Republic.

“A Pakistani diplomat was summoned to the ministry in the absence of the ambassador (as the ambassador was recalled for consultations after the Iranian attacks) to give an explanation regarding several explosions in areas near the city of Serawan in the province of Sistan and Baluchistan that occurred earlier today,” the report said.

Thus, we can say that Tehran, with its great-power ambitions, has finally met with an equally ambitious regional player in the person of Islamabad, and at the same time possessing nuclear weapons.

Pakistan, unlike many neighboring countries that have suffered to one degree or another from Iran’s actions, did not wait to respond and was not afraid of a possible escalation.

Another question is that such Pakistani-Iranian disagreements can, if the parties wish, be resolved quickly enough, since both countries are China’s closest partners, with which they are closely connected not only economically, but also military-politically. Islamabad, however, is larger, Tehran somewhat smaller.

In general, it cannot be ruled out that Pakistan’s retaliatory actions were carried out under the control of Beijing and could even be coordinated with Tehran. But we will know about this only by how Iran ultimately responds to Pakistani attacks.

In addition, both Pakistan and Iran are members of the SCO and the Organization has a good reason to remind itself and its security dimension in the form of the SCO anti-terrorist center in Tashkent. The SCO could invite both countries to develop a certain algorithm for joint actions against terrorist and separatist Baloch groups that use the territories of Pakistan and Iran for attacks from both sides of the border.

HOT BALOCHISTAN
The territory of Baluchistan, a geographical region inhabited by the Baluchis, one of the Indo-European peoples, is divided between Pakistan and Iran. In these territories there are various groups seeking independence from Islamabad and Tehran, respectively. Moreover, these movements are often sponsored by external forces.

Thus, Iran previously, before normalizing relations with Riyadh, accused Saudi Arabia of supporting Sunni jihadist groups present in the Iranian province of Sistan and Baluchestan.

At the moment, a whole mosaic of various Sunni formations is still active there. Most of them arose from the foundations of the leading rebel faction of Iranian Balochistan, Jundallah, which was never able to recover from the defeat in 2010-2011.

It should be noted that the leader of Jundallah himself, Abdulmalik Rigi, rejected accusations that Jundallah is a radical Salafi organization.
“We’re not radical,” he said. “We’re correct. It’s just that everyone else is lax or straight-up heretical. Dunno why they all call us taqfiris.”
Its closest analogue before the split was the Afghan Taliban (a terrorist organization banned in the Russian Federation), which adheres to Hanafi jurisprudence and Maturidi theology, traditional for the region.

Nowadays, Jaysh al-Adl, close to Jundallah and founded by its former members, is among the most active Sunni jihadist groups in Iranian Balochistan.

There are also other anti-government groups operating in Iranian Balochistan. Such as “Harakat Ansar al Iran”, renamed “Harakat al Ansar” - also a “splinter” of “Jundallah”, part of which merged with another independent Islamist Baloch faction “Hizb al Furqan” into a new structure - “Ansar al Furqan”. However, the activity of this group began to decline after the death of its leader Hisham Azizi in 2015.
It’s been a while since we used the Toad the Wet Sprocket analogy.
In turn, secular nationalist groups of Baloch separatists with a left-wing Marxist bias, such as the Balochistan Liberation Front and the Baluchistan Liberation Army, are active in Pakistan. They also, according to the Pakistani authorities, enjoy the protection of external forces, primarily India.
Pakistan would say that.
During their first stage of activity in the 70s of the last century, they fought not only against Pakistan, but also against Iran. And only in the 2000s did they completely refocus on the confrontation with Islamabad. It is likely that the FOB and AOB were able to maintain their secret bases on Iranian territory, ceasing the fight with Tehran, so as not to further irritate the Iranian authorities.

On the other hand, it is obvious that the attacks on the secret cells of Jaysh al-Adl by Iran were largely in the nature of a PR campaign and were not aimed at suppressing terrorist activity.

They were supposed to demonstrate that Iran has become a full-fledged regional power that is capable of suppressing any threats in neighboring states. And thereby putting it on a par with the United States or Israel, which also act against any hostile forces outside their territory.
*Snicker*
ECHO OF GAZA
But in any case, it should be borne in mind that the current Iran-Pakistan escalation is associated with Israeli aggression against the Gaza Strip.
“Doze Juices made us do it!”
The events of October 7 thus became a trigger for regional escalation, which is already extending beyond the Middle East.

It is unlikely that Iran would launch strikes on the territory of Pakistan, where, according to Tehran, Jaish al-Adl terrorists are hiding, if it were not for the need to respond to the actions of the United States and Israel, which killed IRGC officers in Damascus and the leaders of pro-Iranian militias in Iraq.
So they killed a couple of Pakistani tribals? How does that punish The Two Satans?
Also, according to Iran, they directed the actions of the terrorist group ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation) during the terrorist attack in Kerman. All this was a consequence of growing tensions between Iran, on the one hand, and the United States and Israel, on the other, due to the events in Gaza.
Oy.
But against this background, Iran had to somehow demonstrate its readiness to suppress threats from another direction, namely from Pakistani Baluchistan, from where jihadist militants infiltrated into the country and committed terrorist attacks. In this case, an Iranian strike on “friendly” Iraq while ignoring the response in the direction of Pakistan could cause even greater misunderstanding in Baghdad.
It must be really interesting inside their heads...
Iraq, despite its close ties with the Islamic Republic, filed a complaint against the actions of its neighbor to the UN Security Council.
Client kitten bares claws?
However, it is unlikely that Iran's actions will lead to anything more serious. Of course, tensions in the region will increase, but Tehran’s actions themselves are more likely aimed at the domestic Iranian audience. It should have no doubt that the Islamic Republic is ready to destroy its opponents along the perimeter of the country's borders and is not afraid to do this by striking American and Israeli targets.
Did they find their targets by tracking the spy squirrels?
Another question is, are the places where the Iranian missiles fell really the CIA and Mossad bases from where attacks on Iran were coordinated, or were they simply declared so by the IRGC itself?
To ask the question is to answer it.
The same applies to Jaysh al-Adl cells in Pakistan.

The bottom line is that the result of the Iranian attacks on Iraq was the murder of the Kurdish tycoon Peshrav Zeya, who, if the Iranians are to be believed again, was a Mossad agent, but it is not possible to verify or refute this.

Thus, Tehran’s algorithm of actions is as follows:

First, blame the terrorist attack in Kerman on the United States and Israel, which allegedly manage and direct ISIS terrorists. Then take revenge for this terrorist attack by targeting some CIA and Mossad bases in Iraq, which, by the way, neither the United States nor Israel consider their targets. Iran itself declared them as such, and therefore the United States will not take retaliatory actions. Which is exactly what Tehran needed.

All this fits well within the framework of a resonant response that would not lead to a regional war that Iran does not need.
Ouch.
At the same time, the initial story about the alleged complete destruction of the American consulate in Erbil as a result of an Iranian strike with the corresponding footage was most likely made deliberately. For many in the Middle East, this fake story began to take on a life of its own as evidence that it is not only the Houthis who are capable of challenging the United States.
Even though the destruction never happened, those perfidious Yanks being entirely too facile with their anti-drone technology. But reality is not really a factor in that part of the world, poor darlings.
Resonance was all Tehran needed in this situation.

But it is obvious that in the case of Pakistan, Iran did not calculate the reaction. Pakistan has never been afraid to escalate with the much stronger India, and certainly will not retreat in front of Iran.

But at the same time, Tehran itself is by no means eager to enter into confrontation with Islamabad, opening up another front for itself. Therefore, the question is whether Iran will be able not to “follow the principle” and not respond with blows to blows, taking the escalation to a new level.
Interesting times. Especially for the Mad Mullahs, who aren’t getting any of the wars they want.

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Foreign contract soldiers of the RF Armed Forces can become Russians
2024-01-05
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[Regnum] Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on granting Russian citizenship to foreigners who have entered into a contract for military service in the Russian Armed Forces, and members of their families. The text of the document is published on the legal information website.

According to the decree, foreigners who entered into a contract with the Russian Armed Forces during a special military operation will be able to apply for Russian citizenship.

“To establish that foreign citizens who entered into a contract for military service in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation or military formations during a special military operation have the right to apply for citizenship of the Russian Federation <...>,” the document says.

Foreign citizens who were dismissed from military service in the Russian Armed Forces during the SVO period for health reasons, upon reaching the age limit, upon expiration of the contract, or due to the termination of martial law will be able to submit an application.

In addition, relatives of these categories of foreign citizens will also have the right to obtain Russian citizenship.

DECREE ON A SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING RUSSIAN CITIZENSHIP
The new decree cancels the presidential decree of September 30, 2022 on a simplified procedure for granting Russian citizenship to foreigners who entered military service in the Russian Armed Forces under a contract.

Then, according to the document, in order to obtain Russian citizenship in a simplified manner, a foreign citizen or stateless person had to participate in hostilities for at least six months, or suffer injury or injury that would not allow him to continue military service.

Their spouses, children or parents had the right to make a similar application.

OTHER CONCESSIONS FOR FOREIGN CONTRACT WORKERS
In July 2023, the State Duma adopted an amendment on the right of foreigners to enter into a contract to stay in the reserve without access to state secrets. The lower house of parliament supported the amendment on the right of reserve military personnel with senior officer ranks to enter into a contract to remain in the reserve for the first time and on the right of foreigners to enter into a contract to remain in the reserve without access to state secrets. As the authors of the innovation noted, this will allow citizens living in Crimea, Sevastopol and other Russian regions who have Ukrainian citizenship, which has not been terminated for reasons beyond their control, to join the reserve.

In addition, the new amendment supplemented the law with a new article establishing cases of suspension of a citizen’s stay in the reserve.

Solving the problem with “mercenarism”
According to State Duma deputy Alexander Khinshtein, the new decree will solve the problem of extraditing special operation veterans to foreign states for “mercenarism.”

Before this, there were cases where foreigners who had dual citizenship, but served in the Northern Military District, were subject to criminal prosecution in their homeland. Thus, on November 29, a Karaganda court sentenced a veteran of the Russian special operation, a participant in the battles for Artyomovsk, Kazakh citizen Alexey Shompolov to 6 years and 8 months in prison.

In addition, at the end of October, one of the Tashkent courts sentenced Uzbek citizen Ildar Khairulin to five years in prison for participating in hostilities in 2014–2015 on the side of the DPR.

MIGRANTS AND SERVICE IN THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES
In June 2023, the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov noted an increase in the number of people wishing to serve under contract in the Russian army. He regarded this as an extremely positive development.

Despite this, by the end of 2023, 52 criminal cases were opened in Moscow against “naturalized citizens”—people who came from abroad and received Russian passports—for evading military service.

In turn, in August last year, a deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Mikhail Matveev, introduced a bill to the State Duma that would involve depriving acquired Russian citizenship if a person has not registered with the military.

According to the first deputy head of the A Just Russia faction, Dmitry Gusev, it is necessary not to deprive someone of citizenship if he did not serve or shirked, and not to give citizenship without the obligation to serve in the army.

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
The fate of a volunteer. What kind of support is missing for foreign participants of the SVO?
2023-12-08
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Mikhail Zakharov

[REGNUM] A few days apart, two messages arrived related to the same topic - the fate of citizens of the former Soviet republics who voluntarily participated in the defense of Russia in the Northern Military District. The first message is alarming, the second is encouraging.

The first case is the trial in Kazakhstan of a 34-year-old participant in the battles for Artyomovsk, Kazakh citizen Alexei Shompolov . On November 29, one of the district courts of Karaganda sentenced a veteran of the Russian special operation to 6 years and 8 months in prison.

The former fighter was charged with the article “Mercenarism” - according to the Kazakh investigation, Shompolov participated in the battles for Artyomovsk as part of the assault units of the private military company (PMC) “Wagner”. During heavy fighting, he was wounded, discharged, and then returned to his homeland, where he was detained by the police.

“FOR UNDERMINING THE INTEGRITY OF UKRAINE”
The wording used by the justice of the country, which is our partner in the CSTO and the Eurasian Economic Union, is curious.

From the point of view of the Kazakh court, Shompolov’s actions as part of the PMC were aimed “at undermining the constitutional order and violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine.” Therefore, a “mercenary” falls under the relevant article of the Kazakh Criminal Code.

The court's verdict on a real sentence for Shompolov has already entered into force - moreover, payments from PMCs, obtained, according to Kazakh law enforcement officers, by criminal means, were confiscated.

As is known from the words of Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Russia and Kazakhstan today indicate “a mutual desire to expand political, economic, investment, cultural and humanitarian ties.” Let us note that Shompolov, convicted for participation in the SVO, is the living embodiment of these connections: he was born in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Russian, but a citizen of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

But in some respects, Astana clearly has a very specific attitude towards Moscow's policies and actions.

In April of this year, the National Security Committee (NSC) of Kazakhstan reported on the investigation of ten criminal cases regarding the participation of citizens of the country in the conflict in Ukraine - however, the KNS did not provide details about their defendants, including on whose side they are fighting.

However, in the same month, the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan, Aibek Smadiyarov, warned the Kazakh student Margulan Bekenov , who joined Wagner, that a real prison sentence awaits him in his homeland.

“This is criminally prosecuted here in Kazakhstan,” Smadiyarov said then, speaking about participation in PMCs. But, as it turns out, you can be persecuted for supporting the SVO in the republic without joining the ranks of the “Wagners.”

Thus, Kazakh parliament member Azamat Abildaev was deprived of his mandate only for statements in support of a special military operation, and was also expelled from the ranks of the Ak Zhol party, allegedly because of their contradiction to party and parliamentary ethics.

The law is harsh, but it is the law; for Kazakhstan and its law enforcement officers, citizens of the country who take part in the SVO are criminals, Roman Yuneman , a Russian public figure who has lived in Kazakhstan for a long time, emphasizes in a conversation with IA Regnum .

It is worth mentioning that Kazakh citizen Zhasulan Duisembin is fighting on the side of the Kiev regime , which raises the question: will this character receive the same sentence and confiscation of his earnings in Ukraine if he decides to return to his homeland?

It seems that the problem as a whole is much deeper and wider than it might seem at first glance.

But first, we must mention the second, this time encouraging message about the fate of the foreign volunteer.

HAPPY OUTCOME IN MANUAL MODE
The other day it became known that the sad fate of Alexei Shompolov was narrowly avoided by a native of Uzbekistan, Alexander Babkov , who also faced criminal liability there.

Previously, Babkov went to the Northern Military District as a volunteer, participated in heavy battles for Soledar and Artyomovsk, received the state award “For Courage” and a number of other medals: “Bakhmut Meat Grinder”, “For the Capture of Bakhmut”.

However, despite his military merits, he had difficulties obtaining Russian citizenship, as well as obtaining a combat veteran’s certificate and official employment. In addition, his temporary registration expires in January 2024, which could lead to his deportation to Uzbekistan.

“It turns out that I am a member of the SVO, I have awards, but there is no help. A veteran's certificate is issued only to citizens of the Russian Federation. They won’t hire me without documents. I work part-time as a loader, but, of course, that’s not the job. I didn’t know where else to turn, so I turned to the “Not One on One” project. I will continue to try to obtain citizenship,” Babkov said in an interview with RT .

Today, the issue of the legal status of a veteran of the Northern Military District has been taken under control by the head of the Main Directorate for Migration Issues of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Valentina Kazakova.

As official representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Irina Volk assured , “my colleagues will try to process everything as quickly as possible. Alexander can be sure of this.”

The only question that remains is why the problem of a fighter who fought for our country was solved virtually manually, while by presidential decree he was supposed to receive Russian citizenship under simplified conditions.

Let us note that Tashkent also warned that citizens of the country who decided to take part in the SVO, according to Article 154 of the Criminal Code of the Republic “Mercenarism”, would face imprisonment for up to ten years. And there were precedents: a month ago, the Yukorichirchik court sentenced Ildar Khairulin, a resident of the Tashkent region, to five years in prison for military actions in 2014–2015 on the side of the DPR.

It should be clarified that the Armed Forces of Ukraine also had at least one citizen of Uzbekistan as a foreign mercenary. And in the country, despite the declared neutrality , there are citizens who support the Kiev regime not only in word, but also in deed. Therefore, we should be especially attentive to the fate of the people of Uzbekistan who participated in the battles for the interests of our country in Ukraine.

“BY THE VERY FACT OF PERFORMING COMBAT MISSIONS”
Some work in terms of protecting foreign volunteers is already underway, noted military expert Anatoly Matviychuk in a commentary to IA Regnum .

“I know that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in particular diplomats in the CIS countries, carried out explanatory work and sent out letters asking them not to consider volunteers from the CSTO countries and the CIS countries participating in hostilities in Donbass as mercenaries,” says the expert.

However, the interlocutor of IA Regnum notes , it is unlikely that all the recipients of these letters will meet the interests of Moscow. Therefore, many citizens who came to help us at the call of their hearts and consciences may still be subject to criminal prosecution under the laws of those countries where participation in the North Military District is regarded as mercenary activity.

Effective influence on the leadership of these states now seems extremely unlikely, says military instructor, publicist, and native of Almaty Svyatoslav Golikov . “I do not observe any official initiatives regarding the protection of the rights of our volunteers in the near abroad from the Russian side,” Regnum Golikov shared his opinion with the news agency . He believes that the anti-Russian course of those countries does not change, and, “moreover, after the start of the Northeast Military District, the situation will only deteriorate.”

Yes, for the countries of the former USSR and local law enforcement officers, their citizens who take part in the SVO are criminals, such is the official attitude there. “This is a very sensitive issue, but these are the political realities in most of the former Soviet republics; the attitude towards our volunteers has recently changed positively only in Belarus,” the expert adds.

Experts interviewed by Regnum news agency believe that people who fought in the Northern Military District and have proven their right to be citizens of Russia should be quickly granted citizenship - as was done in relation to Babkov.

Particular attention should be paid to the speed and efficiency of the procedure for granting citizenship to people who fought for Russia - the examples of Shompolov and Babkov show that the indifference and passivity of government bodies can result in big troubles for our soldiers.

“Especially against the backdrop of the fact that, meanwhile, Russian citizenship is being massively received by residents of the Central Asian republics, who often view Russia as a “food supply,” but in no way as a Motherland for which they are ready to fight ,” notes Golikov.

In his opinion, it is absolutely necessary to clearly and unambiguously formalize the right of volunteers with foreign citizenship to obtain Russian citizenship in the most simplified and expedited manner “based on the very fact of performing combat or service missions, both directly during the Northern Military District, and more broadly, starting with the 2014 militia "

ANONYMOUS LEGIONNAIRES
All SVO participants from countries where they are persecuted for their beliefs need to think about asylum in the Russian Federation, and they should exclude trips abroad, Nikolai Kostikin, an expert at the Bureau of Military-Political Analysis , told IA Regnum . It must be borne in mind that in some countries not only volunteers, but also members of their families are persecuted, the interlocutor notes.

Considering that the legislation of almost all CIS countries is aimed against the participation of citizens of these countries in hostilities on the side of Russia, special measures are needed to protect volunteers.

“For example, in France, the foreign legion practiced concealing or even changing the identity of a legionnaire. Perhaps this practice should be applied here too,” adds Kostikin.

There is also little doubt about the need to take measures to rescue people who are legally entitled to a Russian passport.

In addition, it is necessary to understand the question of why the citizen of Kazakhstan Shompolov and the citizen of Uzbekistan Babkov did not receive Russian citizenship in their time under a simplified procedure. Perhaps this was due to their own reluctance, but there could also be problems at the legal level, and in the worst case, the elementary reluctance of those in charge to understand the problem.

There are those who want to defend Russia in various parts of the world, and their number is not as small as it might seem, IA Regnum’s interlocutors emphasize. They support us in difficult times for the country, and Russia must show that it does not abandon its own - and this must be not only words, but also actions.

Link


India-Pakistan
PM Kakar says Israel following path of pharaohs
2023-11-10
They're gonna be conquered by the Medes and the Persians, and then by the Greeks?
[GEO.TV] Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar Thursday strongly condemned Israel's war on Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with an iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response...
, particularly the elimination of Paleostinian children, likening it to the "pharaohs" who killed children on the advent of Prophet Moses' birth.

Demanding for Israel's offensive to be stopped immediately, the premier said: "Unfortunately, the people who claim to be the followers of [Prophet] Moses are following the path of pharaohs."

PM Kakar's condemnation came during the 16th Economic Cooperation Organisation Summit in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, where he was delivering a speech before participants of member countries.

He insisted all ECO member states immediately rally behind Paleostinians, stop the cessation of violence and encourage the humanitarian corridor to help the "unfortunate" and "defenceless" people of Paleostine.
Those same defenseless Paleostinians who erupted a month ago to kill, maim, rape, and chop the heads off babies? Pray tell us, sir: What should be an appropriate penalty for those actions?
Condemning Israel for its atrocities on the residents of Gaza, PM Kakar said: "The incessant and lethal bombardments of Gaza by the Israeli forces is a deplorable act, which calls for international condemnation. This issue needs to be addressed in accordance with the relevant United Nations
...an organization which on balance has done more bad than good, with the good not done well and the bad done thoroughly...
Security Council (UNSC) and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) resolutions."
Related:
Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar: 2023-10-15 6 labourers killed, two wounded in Turbat attack
Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar: 2023-10-14 State powerful enough to fight TTP even for 100 years: PM Kakar
Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar: 2023-10-03 Govt to expel over 1 million illegal immigrants, Afghan nationals living in Pakistan
Related:
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation: 2023-10-29 At UNGA, Pakistan backs OIC's proposal of sending protection force in Gaza
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation: 2023-09-27 Mosque burned into ashes in Sweden
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation: 2023-09-26 Quran desecration in Hague 'deliberately provocative, Islamophobic act': FO
Related:
Security Council: 2023-11-08 The Ministry of Internal Affairs puts ICC judge Sergio Godinez on the wanted list
Security Council: 2023-11-04 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: November 3rd, 2023
Security Council: 2023-11-04 'Don’t read the damn Telegram.' What is the Ukrainian Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council afraid of?
Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
He began his intelligence service with a reconnaissance company
2023-11-03
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[RedStar] From the memoirs of Major General Vladimir Nikiforovich Vorobyov, military intelligence sergeant. November 5 – Military Intelligence Day

1943 was a fateful year for me. This year, all young men born in 1925 were drafted into the army. I was called up for military service in the city of Tashkent, thinking that I was 18 years old, but in fact I was 17 and a half. I was enrolled as a cadet at the Tashkent Military Infantry School in a company of Maxim heavy machine guns.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More