Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

India-Pakistan
Pakistan Threatens War on India Over Attempts to Block Indus River Waters
2025-04-25
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[Regnum] Pakistan will regard India's attempt to divert the flow of water from the Indus River as an act of war. This was stated by the country's National Security Committee.

"Any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water, or usurp the rights of lower riparian states, will be considered an act of war," the department said in a decision published by Dawn.

The committee also said that trade with India, including to and from any other country via Pakistan, is being suspended. Islamabad is also stopping all visas under the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) visa waiver scheme. Visas issued to Indian citizens are now considered cancelled.

As reported by the Regnum news agency, following the meeting of the Pakistani Security Council, which was held in connection with New Delhi's reaction to the terrorist attack in the Indian part of Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan decided to close its airspace to India. The press service of the country's Prime Minister's Secretariat clarified that this decision concerns all Indian or Indian-run airlines.

In addition, Pakistan is closing the Wagah crossing point with immediate effect. All cross-border transit from India via this route shall be suspended without exception. Those who have crossed the border with the appropriate permits may return through this crossing point, but not later than April 30.

On April 22, gunmen opened fire in the city of Pahalgam. They opened fire on tourists who were horse riding. At least 27 people were killed, including foreigners, women and elderly people. The attackers managed to escape.

According to the News18 TV channel, the Lashkar-e-Taiba group (a terrorist organization banned in Russia) claimed responsibility for the attack.

That evening, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed condolences to Indian President Droupadhi Murmu and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in connection with the terrorist attack near the city of Pahalgam. The Russian leader also confirmed his readiness to further increase cooperation with Indian partners in the fight against all forms and manifestations of terrorism.

Link


India-Pakistan
Modi tells Pakistan to 'walk away from terror' if it wants dialogue with India
2017-01-18
[DAWN] Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday asked Pakistain to "walk away from terror" if it wants to establish amicable relations with India, The Indian Express reported.

Modi was speaking at the inauguration of the second edition of the Raisina Dialogue, an annual conference held in New Delhi, envisioned to be India's flagship conference on geopolitics and geo-economics.

In his speech, he said if Pakistain wants to build a relationship with India and have a dialogue, it must distance itself from "terror activities".

"Those in our neighbours who support violence, hatred and export terror stand isolated and ignored," Modi said.

The Indian premier said he extended an invitation to all members of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), including Pakistain, around the time he assumed office.

"I had also travelled to Lahore but India alone cannot walk the path of peace," the Indian premier added.

Link


India-Pakistan
Two Nuclear Powers Are One Skirmish Away From All Out War
2016-10-30
[Daily Caller] India and Pakistan each expelled a high-ranking opposing diplomat Thursday amid increasing tensions over the disputed northern territory of Kashmir.

India expelled the Pakistani diplomat on charges of "espionage activities" on India’s security capabilities on the Kashmiri border. Pakistan angrily responded that the charges were "false and unsubstantiated" before itself expelling a member of the Indian High Commission in Islamabad.

Tensions between the two countries skyrocketed after India suppressed a civilian uprising in Kashmir, culminating in the Indian killing of Kashmiri militant leader Burhan Wani. Wani was a major agitator against Indian administration of Kashmir, and frequently posted social media videos calling for violent uprising. His death sparked widespread protests across Kashmir, and was strongly condemned by the Pakistani government.

As angry rhetoric about terrorist sponsorship increased on both sides, a border clash between the two security forces erupted Sept. 17. Islamist militants stormed into an Indian Army base and gunned down 17 Indian soldiers, which the Indian government immediately blamed on Pakistan. "I am deeply disappointed with Pakistan’s continued and direct support to terrorism and terrorist groups," India’s Home Minister Rajnath Singh said on Twitter after the attack.

The Indian government claimed two weeks later Oct. 3 to have conducted "surgical strikes" by special forces across the Pakistani line of control in Kashmir. Indian incursion into Pakistan without prior notice again inflamed tensions to higher levels. The Pakistani government denies any such raid took place.

Experts say Pakistan’s government insists the strikes did not took place, because if they did so they would be forced to respond. "The Pakistani military would be forced to retaliate in the event of a more prominent strike," retired Indian Army Col. Ajai Shukla wrote in a New Delhi paper.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi even pulled out of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation scheduled for November. Modi then went so far as to denounce Pakistan as the "mothership of terrorism" at a Oct. 26 meeting with Russian, Chinese and Brazilian heads of state. Modi’s escalation rhetoric is meant to put pressure on Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to crackdown on terrorist militant groups operating inside his borders.

The problem is Sharif has a limited amount of authority over the Pakistani Army, which is seen as the main sponsor of the militant groups. "Prime Minister Sharif knows better than most that there are limits to how far he can push the army without the army pushing him out the door," he elaborated. Sharif was ousted in a 1999 coup d’état by Pakistani Army Gen. Pervez Musharraf.

The tensions even extend to the cultural realm. Nationalist fervor is sweeping India in the wake of the September attacks, as prominent Indian film directors came out pledging not to hire Pakistani actors, or screen films with Pakistani cast members. Pakistan angrily responded by banning all Indian radio and television shows from the country, despite their widespread popularity.

While nationalist fervor and strong rhetoric is good for Modi domestically, it is amplifying support for the army in Pakistan, according to Myra MacDonald’s, author of "Defeat Is an Orphan: How Pakistan Lost the Great South Asian War."

"When we get to the next terror attack, which is probably only a matter of time, the prime minister has boxed himself in, and he can’t take the route his predecessors did and choose to use solely diplomatic alternatives without some loss of face," Brookings Institution fellow Bruce Riedel told The New York Times Oct. 23.
Link


India-Pakistan
Modi calls Pakistan ‘mother-ship of terrorism’
2016-10-17
[Dhaka Tribune] Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi branded Pakistain a "mother-ship of terrorism" at a summit of the BRICS nations on Sunday, testing the cohesion of a group whose heavyweight member China is a close ally of its South Asian arch-rival.

Modi’s remarks to a meeting of leaders from the BRICS ‐ which include Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa ‐ escalated his diplomatic drive to isolate Pakistain, which India accuses of sponsoring cross-border terrorism.

Tension between the nuclear-armed neighbours has escalated since a September 18 attack on an army base in Kashmire, near the disputed frontier with Pakistain, killed 19 Indian soldiers in the worst such assault in 14 years.

India later said it had carried out retaliatory "surgical strikes" across the de facto border that inflicted significant casualties. Pakistain denied any role in the attack on the Uri army base, and said the Indian operation had not even happened, dismissing it as typical cross-border firing.

"In our own region, terrorism poses a grave threat to peace, security and development," Modi said in his remarks to BRICS leaders who met at a resort hotel in the western state of Goa.

"Tragically, the mother-ship of terrorism is a country in India’s neighbourhood," the 66-year-old prime minister said, without directly naming Pakistain, in a series of tweets issued by the foreign ministry.

No immediate reaction was available from Pakistain’s foreign ministry.

Modi’s posturing overshadowed the gathering of leaders of a group originally set up to boost economic cooperation. It followed a productive bilateral summit with President Vladimir Putin of Russia on Saturday that yielded billions of dollars in defence and energy deals.

The BRICS leaders had donned brightly coloured sleeveless jackets, of a style made popular by India’s first post-independence leader Jawaharlal Nehru, for an informal dinner on Saturday evening.

They were due later on Sunday to hold an outreach session with leaders from a little-known group of countries from the Bay of Bengal region whose key attribute, from India’s point of view, is that Pakistain is not a member.

Modi’s hard line against Pakistain marks a departure from India’s tradition of strategic restraint, and New Delhi has won expressions of support from both the West and Russia over the army base attack.

Yet China, a longstanding ally of Pakistain that plans to build a $46 billion export corridor, has shown public restraint.

Modi and President Xi Jinping also held a bilateral meeting on Saturday and the accounts of their conversation emerging from both sides pointed to key differences of opinion.

In one remark reported by the state Xinhua news agency, Xi said that China and India should "support each other in participating in regional affairs and enhance cooperation within multilateral frameworks".

The dispatch went on to refer to the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc). This grouping includes Pakistain, which was to have hosted a summit in November that collapsed after India and other members pulled out.

The final BRICS summit declaration was expected to repeat earlier condemnations of "terrorism in all its forms", say diplomats and analysts, but avoid levelling blame over tensions between India and Pakistain.

"Modi is aware that such language wouldn’t get the consensus necessary to make it into the final communique. Including it in his speech ensures it gets wide circulation anyway," said South Asia expert Shashank Joshi.

"So far, we haven’t seen any indication at all that China is softening its public support for Pakistain. India did not expect differently," added Joshi, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistan seeks bigger Saarc to counter India’s influence
2016-10-14
[DAWN] Pakistain is exploring the possibility of creating a greater South Asian economic alliance to counter India’s controlling hold on the eight-member South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc), diplomatic observers say.

A parliamentary delegation from Pakistain, which is now in New York, pitched this idea during its five-day visit to Washington last week.

"A greater South Asia is already emerging," said Senator Mushahid Hussain Syed, in one of his interactions with the media. "This greater South Asia includes China, Iran and the neighbouring Central Asian republics."

He described the China-Pakistain Economic Corridor as the key economic route linking South Asia with Central Asia. The Gwadar port, he pointed out, would be the nearest warm water port, not only for China but also for the land-locked Central Asian states.

"We want India to join this arrangement as well," said Mr Hussain, an offer Indians are unlikely to accept as they are comfortable with the advantage that Saarc provides them.

Last month, India used its influence in Saarc to isolate Pakistain when it announced that it would not attend the regional group’s 19th summit, scheduled in Islamabad on Nov 15 and 16.
Link


India-Pakistan
More states join India to wreck Saarc summit
2016-09-30
[DAWN] Postponement of the upcoming Saarc (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) summit in Islamabad in November looked certain on Wednesday as three more members -- Bangladesh, Bhutan and Afghanistan -- followed in India’s footsteps, pulling out of the leaders’ meeting citing concerns over ’terrorism and external interference’.
It's so nice to see Pakistan get just a little of what it so richly deserves.
An announcement in this regard by Saarc’s current chair Nepal remains a mere formality, which was being delayed because the Nepalese foreign minister and foreign secretary were in New York in connection with the UN General Assembly session. The formal announcement is expected on their return.

A senior Pak diplomat told Dawn that Nepal was being consulted.

Adviser to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs Sartaj PrunefaceAziz
...Adviser to Pak Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on National Security and Foreign Affairs, who believes in good jihadis and bad jihadis as a matter of national policy...

, according to Radio Pakistain, said the postponement was likely, but the Saarc Secretariat was yet to notify it. Quoting Saarc rules, he said, a summit cannot be held if any member refuses to attend.

India had a day earlier expressed its inability to attend the meeting because of non-conducive environment in the region created by "increasing cross-border terrorist attacks and growing interference in internal affairs of member states by one country".

The Indian decision is attributed to the Sept 18 Uri military camp attack in which 18 soldiers were killed. The latest phase in Pakistain-India tensions started with the eruption of protests in held Kashmire in July, but the situation worsened after the Uri attack.

Link


India-Pakistan
‘Rajnath took up Hafiz’s challenge’
2016-09-01
[The Hindu] Home Minister Rajnath Singh had decided to go to Pakistain to attend the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) meeting after Lashkar-e-Taiba
...the Army of the Pure, an Ahl-e-Hadith terror organization founded by Hafiz Saeed. LeT masquerades behind the Jamaat-ud-Dawa facade within Pakistain and periodically blows things up and kills people in India. Despite the fact that it is banned, always an interesting concept in Pakistain, the organization remains an blatant tool and perhaps an arm of the ISI...
(LeT) founder Hafiz Saeed
...founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba and its false-mustache offshoot Jamaat-ud-Dawa. The United Nations declared the JuD a terrorist organization in 2008 and Hafiz Saeed a terrorist as its leader. Hafiz, JuD and LeT are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Pak intel apparatus, so that amounted to squat...
issued a threat against his visit, a senior North Block official said on Wednesday.

While the government was still debating about Mr. Singh’s participation in the SAARC Interior Minister’s conference on August 3-4 in Islamabad, Hafiz Saeed’s open threat proved to be the catalyst. "Hafiz Saeed dared the Home Minister to visit Pakistain. We couldn’t have taken this lightly. He decided to go since not participating in the conference would have sent a wrong message that India cowed down under Hafiz Saeed’s threats," said the North Block official.

Saeed message
On August 1, Hafiz Saeed posted a video message and warned the Pakistain government of dire consequences if Mr. Singh visited Islamabad.

Saeed had said in the video message that Pakistain government should not host Mr. Singh as he was responsible for the killing of Kashmiris in wake of the protests that erupted in the valley after Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani was killed in an encounter on July 8.

"Even when the Home Minister reached Islamabad, on way to the hotel, we could see number of protesters on the road. The Pakistain government might not have orchestrated the protests but they were too close for comfort. Imagine, a terrorist outfit protesting with impunity in India during the visit of an international leader?" asked the official.

After returning from Pakistain, Mr. Singh had told the Parliament, "Keeping in mind the country's prestige, I did what I should have done. I have no complaints."

Link


India-Pakistan
Indian belligerence again
2015-06-11
[DAWN] ONCE again, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government appears bent on raising the temperature in the India-Pakistan relationship.
He wasn't talking to Pakistain. He was talking to Bangladesh, formerly East Pakistain. The 1971 version of the Pak govt handling of what started as an argument over use of the Bengali language and script was singularly oppressive. India's help to the Bangla rebels resulted in a humiliating defeat for the Paks. The Paks don't like to talk about it, but it's pretty understandable that India and Bangladesh would reminisce over old times.
Once again, it is difficult to discern any wisdom or even common sense in the Indian strategy. Having travelled to Bangladesh as part of his extensive outreach to the region — an outreach that increasingly looks like Mr Modi’s attempt to try and isolate Pakistan inside Saarc
...The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, established in 1985 for no apparent reason and consisting of seven countries plus, recently, Afghanistan. The seven founding nations are Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, which must make group discussions on any topic very interesting, indeed. Saarc has a special poem as a placeholder until a proper anthem is devised.
— the Indian prime minister rather bizarrely harkened back to the terrible events of some 45 years ago that led to the break-up of Pakistan and boasted about the Indian role in the creation of Bangladesh.
Since it was Indian help that tipped the scales it's entirely appropriate to talk about it. In private they probably talked about Pakistain's efforts to subvert both countries. In Bangla it's through the nasty Jamaat-e-Islami and the BNP.
If that were not enough, Mr Modi decided to go on to attack present-day Pakistan in the same speech in what can only be described as the most un-prime-ministerial terms.
You think he might be cheesed at the way Pakistain keeps sending bad boyz across the Line of Control? It goes pretty much like clockwork: Pak firing across the border to provide cover for infiltrators. They blame the firing on India. Anywhere from three days to a week later there are three or four or a dozen hard boyz killed in a shootout at Kupwara or someplace like that. They don't even try to be subtle about it.
In Pakistan the subtle is so overlain by fantastical Byzantine plotting that it quite disappears into the plain fabric somewhere underlying the embroidery.
Extraordinarily, what the Indian leader had to say about Pakistan and the history of Bangladesh were not even the most provocative of statements emanating from Indian quarters in recent days. That rather dubious honour instead goes to a junior Indian minister who suggested that the Indian cross-border raid into Myanmar in response to an attack on Indian security forces in India’s northeast late last week could be repeated on the western, ie India-Pakistan border, if necessary.
Maybe the Indian army could fire across the LoC to provide cover for brainless cannon fodder to shoot up Muzzafargah or someplace like that.
How would they be able to differentiate from natives shooting up Muzzafargah and points elsewhere for the usual variety of reasons Pakistanis shoot things up?
Consider the breathtaking Indian arrogance on display here, and even naked war-mongering. Mr Modi’s comments in Dhaka hearken to a dark past for all sides — Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.
Especially Pakistain: Their military pretty much just rolled over, unconditional surrender, something like 90,000 PoWs. I'm sure the Indian public was just overjoyed to keep them in chapatis until they were finally repatriated.
To be sure, West Pakistan committed many errors and even crimes against what was then East Pakistan and there has never been any real introspection or accountability for that period here in present-day Pakistan.
It was swept under the national rug. If you don't think about it then it didn't happen.
And according to "West Pakistani" society ladies, it only beautified the East Bangladeshis that so many babies were born in the year that followed with substantially lighter skin than adorned their mothers' husbands. So that was a kindness, you see.
Yet, Pakistan and Bangladesh managed to go on to build ties that were reasonably stable and respectful and not even remotely comparable to the almost seven-decade-old effectively failed relationship between India and Pakistan.
Relations between Pak and India would probably be much better if the Paks didn't do stoopid stuff, like sending jihadis backed by regulars to start wars over disputed glaciated territory. Pak and India have managed to fight four wars in approximately 70 years, losing every one of them.
It's those legendary Pakistani generals. They helped Jordan against Israel, too, as I recall.
Is Mr Modi’s goal really to try and drive a wedge between Bangladesh and Pakistan? In any case, Pakistan’s political and diplomatic leadership have for a while now needed to urgently reach out to the Bangladeshi government of Prime Minister Hasina Wajed because of the attempt by that government to stoke tensions with Pakistan for domestic political reasons.
Howzat Fifth Column idea working out for yez?
An India bent on meddling with an already stand-offish government in place in Bangladesh can rapidly become a much sterner diplomatic test than the Pakistani state appears to have realised until now.
It doesn't help matters that the current PM's father (also Father of His Country) was bumped off by Pak agents. The much more recent grenade attack against her--I believe the corpse count was a couple dozen--probably didn't make her any happier with the Pak govt, even though their connection with HuJI was plausibly denied.
The flame-throwing from the Indian side has rather predictably riled politicians here. Instead of allowing the foreign and defence ministries to respond to the Indian provocations, Interior Minister Nisar Ali Khan decided to wade into the controversy created by Indian junior minister Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore’s allusion to cross-border raids inside Pakistan.
Come to think of it, there's a difference between a defense minister and a minister of the interior who's incapable of keeping Karachi from looking like 1970 Dhaka.
Meanwhile, the army leadership too has waded in with a strong statement against Indian interference yesterday. Perhaps the prime minister needs to convene his national security council to draw up a concerted, diplomatic response.
Table thumping is so much more satisfying as a response.
Link


India-Pakistan
Pakistani 'state actors' destabilising India: minister
2014-12-01
[DAWN] India's home affairs minister on Saturday accused Pak "state actors" of attempting to destabilise his country.

Home Affairs Minister Rajnath Singh alleged at a security conference in India's northeast that Pakistain was still supporting faceless myrmidons fighting Indian troops in Kashmire.

Mr Singh pointed to a guerilla attack earlier this week on an army patrol in India-held Kashmire in which at least 10 people were killed.

"It is unfortunate Pakistain does not mend its ways," he said, singling out Pakistain's Inter-Services Intelligence
...the Pak military intelligence agency that controls the military -- heads of ISI typically get promoted into the Chief of Army Staff position. It serves as a general command center for favored turban groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad, tries to influence the politix of neighboring countries, and carries out a (usually) low-level war against India in Kashmir...
as one of the "state actors" seeking to disturb India's security.

"I do not hesitate in saying Pak state actors have a role in destabilising India," Mr Singh said and repeated a longstanding demand that Pakistain rein in Lion of Islams.

Mr Singh's remarks come on the heels of the Saarc (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) summit held earlier this week in the Nepalese capital of Kathmandu that was reportedly overshadowed by India-Pakistain rivalry and ended with little progress towards regional integration.

Since 1989 about a dozen Kashmiri groups, seeking independence or a merger of the territory with Pakistain, have been fighting Indian troops -- a battle that has left tens of thousands of people dead, most of them civilians.
Link


Afghanistan
Ghani Speaks Out Against Proxy Warfare at South Asia Summit
2014-11-28
[Tolo News] At a gathering of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) on Wednesday, Afghanistan's Caped President Ashraf Ghani
...former chancellor of Kabul University, now president of Afghanistan. Before returning to Afghanistan in 2002 he was a scholar of political science and anthropology. He worked at the World Bank working on international development assistance. As Finance Minister of Afghanistan between July 2002 and December 2004, he led Afghanistan's attempted economic recovery until the Karzais stole all the money. ..
assured officials from Afghanistan's neighboring countries that he would not allow Afghan territory to be used as a springboard for attacks on other countries nor a battleground for proxy war.

"We will not allow our territory to be used against any of our neighbors, but we will also not permit anybody to conduct proxy wars on our soil either," Ghani said. President Ghani reminded participants of the summit that while he spoke, insurgency wages on in Afghanistan. He pointed to the recent attack in Paktika
...which coincidentally borders South Wazoo...
province as evidence of the dire state of security in the country.

Indian's Prime Minister Narendra Modi echoed Ghani's comments with calls for cooperation to combat terrorism in the region. "We feel the endless pain of loss of lives, let's work together to fulfill the pledges we have taken to combat terrorism," he said. "For India, our vision for the region rests on five pillars: trade, investment, assistance and cooperation..."

Meanwhile,
...back at the the conspirators' cleverly concealed hideout the long-awaited message arrived. They quickly got to work with their decoder rings...
the Pak delegation made familiar promises to work honestly and cooperatively to bring peace to the region. "My vision for our region is a dispute free South Asia, where instead of fighting each other we jointly fight poverty, illiteracy, disease, malnutrition and unemployment; we invest in your youth to unleash their creativity, talent and enterprise, we need a bone of trust so that we can solve our problems," Pakistain's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif
... served two non-consecutive terms as prime minister, heads the Pakistain Moslem League (Nawaz). Noted for his spectacular corruption, the 1998 Pak nuclear test, border war with India, and for being tossed by General Musharraf...
said.

The SAARC summit was hosted in Nepal, the third time the small mountainous country has organized the event. Eight countries participated.
Link


India-Pakistan
Meeting Kashmiri leaders: 'Pakistan engages with all stakeholders'
2014-08-21
[DAWN] Pakistain remains hopeful of strengthening ties with India despite an angry New Delhi last week cancelling scheduled talks between the nuclear-armed rival neighbours, Pakistain's high commissioner said Wednesday.

Abdul Basit said Pakistain was confident of "overcoming this setback" after Delhi called off the diplomatic talks in Islamabad in a blow to warmer ties between the new Indian government and Islamabad.

Basit also defended his meetings with Kashmiri leaders earlier this week, a move that prompted Delhi to accuse its arch-rival of interfering in its domestic affairs and cancel the talks.

"We believe Kashmiris are a stakeholder in this (diplomatic) process, "Basit told news hounds in the capital, explaining that the meetings with the separatists were a "longstanding" practice.

"We will not allow the process (of stronger ties) to be distracted in any way,"

Basit said, adding, "You will find Pakistain seriously committed to the process. "

"There is no reason why we should lose hope of a strong bilateral relationship," he said.

Last month, the two countries scheduled talks between their foreign secretaries for August 25.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's surprise move to invite his Pak counterpart, Nawaz Sharif
... served two non-consecutive terms as prime minister, heads the Pakistain Moslem League (Nawaz). Noted for his spectacular corruption, the 1998 Pak nuclear test, border war with India, and for being tossed by General Musharraf...
, to his swearing-in ceremony in May spurred hopes that peace talks between the two countries could resume.

The warmer ties were dented last week when Modi accused Islamabad of waging a "proxy war" by sending Lions of Islam to attack Indian targets.

There have also been several ceasefire violations across the Kashmiri border that have angered India.

India and Pakistain have fought three wars since independence, two of them over the disputed Kashmire region.

Relations between the two neighbours broke down after attacks by Pak gunnies on Mumbai in 2008 left 166 people dead.

The United States earlier this week termed the cancellation of the talks disappointing.

State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said the US was engaging with the Indian and Pakistain governments to support efforts to improve their relations.

Basit also appreciate Indian Prime Minister Modi's statement on Independence Day that South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) nations need to work together.

He further said that time has come for India and Pakistain to move from confrontation to cooperation and added that "if both counties work together, sky is the limit."
Link


India-Pakistan
India: Recognizing Pakistan's Paradigm Shift
2014-06-06
[The Diplomat] Prime Minister Narendra Modi's invitation to leaders of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries to attend his swearing-in ceremony has been termed a "foreign policy masterstroke." The highlight was arguably Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's attendance, despite a delay in accepting the invitation.

Modi's BJP party has in the past criticized the ex-UPA government's Pakistan policy as too soft, and had vowed in the run-up to elections to take a tough stance against Pakistan. However, Indian leaders must recognize the psychological underpinnings of the Pakistani state, which is central to taming the famously fractious relationship.

Pakistan's military has built the identity of the Pakistani state in opposition to India, and this perpetuation and sustainment of the Indian threat is what has made the Pakistan Army the most powerful and omnipresent institution in its polity. This siege mentality has legitimized its rule in the eyes of ordinary Pakistanis and enabled it to extract the exorbitant funding and revenues that it does, consequently derailing pro-democracy forces and civil society. The military's unprecedented monopoly over Pakistani politics, and the inflated revenue that the myth of the Indian threat derives explains the lack of incentive for the army to better relations with India.

While a tough line on Pakistan may have been appropriate for New Delhi a few years ago, in recent years the state of affairs seems to have somewhat altered. There is a growing realization in Pakistan that India no longer poses the largest threat to the country, and in this realization lies Pakistan's greatest hope of becoming a "normal" country, and not the dysfunctional security state that it currently is. The biggest security risks are those stemming from within the country, and not from external sources like India, a realization that frames the military as part of the problem, rather than the solution. Perhaps nothing can better capture Pakistan's miscalculations and militancy culture than Mohsin Hamid's catchphrase, "To fight India, we fought ourselves."

The Army itself is starting to see the light; evident in its new doctrine's shift in threat assessment, as militant groups they once propelled turn against the state and attack its security apparatuses. According to acclaimed Pakistani author Ahmed Rashid, "The anti-India rhetoric that has been part of Pakistan's entire make-up for over 50 years has now dramatically altered even within the army, which recognizes that we have to deal with the Taliban threat." Indeed, even Pakistan's feared Inter-Services Intelligence has acknowledged that homegrown militants have surpassed India as Pakistan's greatest threat.

Additionally, there is a growing perception that engaging with India is an opportunity to resuscitate Pakistan's stagnant economy, as evident in Islamabad's recent overtures to New Delhi on liberalized trade deals, as well as its three-year economic reform agenda program with the IMF that emphasizes trade ties with India.

India-Pakistan relations are at a pivotal point in history. As India experiences a change of guard in New Delhi, the first Pakistan government to experience a transfer of power from one civilian regime to another is marking a year in office. The timing is good for the bilateral relationship to move beyond conventional differences, and capitalize on the enormous economic potential of the relationship. India must adopt a constructive and robust, rather than belligerent and reckless, approach to Pakistan, especially in light of this progressive narrative change in internal Pakistani politics. It must be innovative in "normalizing" its relations with Pakistan and review other tactics, including collaborative attempts with other states to diplomatically pressure and stabilize Pakistan, support for civilian structures and accelerated economic engagement. Under the leadership of an assertive and dynamic Modi, India is now well positioned to take these steps.
Link


-12 More