Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Iraq
US top court rules against Americans held in Iraq
2008-06-14
Federal judges cannot block US military officials from turning over two Americans held in Iraq to local authorities who want to prosecute them for involvement in the insurgency or criminal activity, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday.
The Supremes actually turned down an opportunity to extend their reach? I'm surprised ...
The high court's decision was a defeat for two Americans who say they are innocent and who are being held by US soldiers at Camp Cropper near Baghdad International Airport. Chief Justice John Roberts said in the court's opinion that the two lawsuits should have been promptly dismissed.

Their lawyers say the two men might be tortured or even killed if they are transferred to Iraqi custody and that they should have access to US courts to challenge their detention and to stop their transfer to Iraqi authorities.

One case involved Mohammad Munaf, an Iraqi-American with dual citizenship. He was convicted in Iraq and sentenced to death for his suspected role in the 2005 kidnapping of three Romanian journalists. His conviction was later overturned by an Iraqi court and his case sent back for further investigation.

The other case involved Shawqi Omar, an American-Jordanian citizen who is accused of being a senior associate of the late insurgent leader Abu Musab Al Zarqawi. A federal judge in Washington DC, and then a US appeals court blocked Omar's transfer to Iraqi custody.

The Bush administration has argued that US courts have no jurisdiction over the cases, partly because the two men are being held under the auspices of multinational forces in Iraq, of which US troops are only a part.

The court rejected the administration's arguments that the two men have no rights whatsoever to habeas corpus-the right to challenge their imprisonment. Roberts said the right extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command. But he held that US courts do not have the power to block their transfer to a foreign country for criminal prosecution.

Roberts said the two men's claim that they would be tortured if transferred to Iraqi custody was a serious concern. But he said the issue had to be addressed the political branches of government, not the judiciary.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court to Hear U.S. Citizens Held in Iraq
2007-12-08
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to intervene in the cases of two naturalized U.S. citizens who want to stop American forces in Baghdad from turning them over to Iraqi authorities.

Mohammad Munaf faces a death sentence after a judge in the Central Criminal Court of Iraq found him guilty of kidnapping Romanian citizens. Munaf says he is innocent. In the other case, Shawqi Omar was alleged to be harboring an Iraqi insurgent and four Jordanian Jihadist fighters when his Baghdad home was raided in 2004. He faces a trial in Iraqi courts and also proclaims his innocence. The raid by multinational forces targeted associates of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, at the time the al-Qaida leader in Iraq.

In the cases of Munaf and Omar, different U.S. courts gave conflicting interpretations of a 1948 ruling by the Supreme Court. The lower U.S. courts ruled against Munaf, but in favor of Omar.

Munaf was born in Baghdad and was working as a translator and guide for three Romanian journalists abducted in 2005 in Iraq and held for 55 days. Troops from the multinational force, of which U.S. troops are a part, freed the captives. The multinational troops detained Munaf because they suspected he was involved in the kidnapping.
He'll get as much sympathy as the orphan who murdered his parents.
Munaf spent 10 years in the U.S., moving to Bucharest, Romania, in 2001. His wife is Romanian. Munaf is in U.S. custody at Camp Cropper near Baghdad International Airport, where the multinational force is holding him on behalf of the Iraqi government pending resolution of his appeal in the Iraqi courts.

A federal court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by Munaf's sister seeking to bar his transfer to the Iraqis. The federal judge said Munaf is not in the custody of the United States, but is instead in the hands of coalition troops, of which U.S. forces are a part. The coalition troops, the federal court said, are answerable to the United Nations and its member countries. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the ruling.

The U.S. courts in Munaf's case relied on a 1948 Supreme Court decision in which Japanese citizens unsuccessfully sought to challenge their sentences by a military tribunal in Japan. The justices said the tribunal's authority came from Allied forces and not the United States. The Supreme Court said federal courts had no jurisdiction because the military panel was not a U.S. tribunal, thought it had been set up by General Douglas MacArthur. MacArthur, the Supreme Court ruled, did so while acting as head of the Allied forces.

In the case of Omar, his lawyers say he traveled to Iraq with his 10-year-old son after the fall of Baghdad in 2003 seeking contract work in reconstruction. In the custody of the U.S. military ever since the raid, Omar's wife got a federal judge in Washington, D.C., to block the multinational force from turning him over to Iraqi authorities for prosecution. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the U.S. government's assertion that the 1948 Supreme Court ruling meant that federal courts had no authority to decide Omar's case. The appeals court said that Omar, unlike the Japanese nationals in the 1948 Supreme Court case, has not been charged with a crime much less convicted of one and that he has remained in the control of U.S. forces.
Except that he is being charged with a crime: harboring insurgents in his home. He's being charged in the Iraqi courts. Our duty is to turn him over to be tried unless the current status agreement prevents that.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Gummint wants US terror suspect tried in Iraq
2006-09-12
WASHINGTON - Government attorneys said Monday that US courts have no authority to stop the military from transferring an American citizen to an Iraqi court to face charges he supported terrorists and insurgents. The case is the latest legal challenge to the Bush administration’s authority to keep terrorism cases, even those involving US citizens, out of American courts.

Shawqi Omar, a citizen of both Jordan and the United States who once served in the Minnesota National Guard, was captured in Iraq in 2004. He is being held at Camp Bucca, a prison in southern Iraq, where his family says he has not been charged or allowed to speak with a lawyer.
So exactly which uniform was he wearing when he was captured?
His family is demanding that Omar be brought before a US court, where prosecutors would have to show probable cause for detaining him and he could consult with an attorney. The military, which says Omar was harboring insurgents and had bomb-making materials at the time of his arrest, wants to transfer him to an Iraqi court. A judge blocked that transfer in February.

On appeal Monday before the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, government attorneys said American courts don’t have jurisdiction because Omar is being held by a multinational force, not the US military. Defense attorneys say that is a legal gimmick.
And it's a damned good gimmick.
A three-judge panel also expressed skepticism, saying the government’s theory might allow the military to arrest someone inside the United States and hold him without due process _ all under the guise of a multinational force.
No, because we wouldn't allow a MNF inside the States.
Deputy Solicitor General Gregory Garre said that wouldn’t happen but the judges noted that it could. The judges also seemed wary of saying courts had no jurisdiction over a US citizen being held by his country’s military.

Let’s assume he was in Iraq seeking a job,’ Judge David S. Tatel said. How can it be that the District Court lacks the ability to prohibit his transfer to Iraq?’
Because he's in Iraq, a sovereign nations with a legal and judicial system, which is capable of judging the guilt or innocence of a man accused of a crime. The supposition that he can only be tried by Americans is an insult to the Iraqis.
Judge Harry T. Edwards was even more pointed, saying the government was ignoring the Supreme Court’s 2004 ruling that an American in Afghanistan could challenge his detention in US courts.

Omar is described in court papers as a relative of former Iraq Al Qaida leader Abu Musab Al Zarqawi. Authorities say Omar also plotted to kidnap foreigners from Baghdad hotels.
Moral of the story: don't take prisoners. Is that what the Court of Appeals wants?
Attorneys for Omar’s family say he is innocent and likely to be tortured if handed over to the Iraqi government. They say he is a businessman who was seeking reconstruction contracts in Iraq.

Despite their skepticism for the government’s argument, the three judges suggested Omar’s family’s attorney, Aziz Huq, might be reading too much into the law. Even if the court sided with Omar, the judges said the military might only be required to release him, not to transfer him to a US court. That wouldn’t prevent him from being arrested and charged by Iraqis.
"Here you go, Achmed, he's all yours now!"
"Thank you Tyrone. Would you like the cuffs back?"
Separately, Omar was indicted in Jordan with Zarqawi and 11 others on charges they plotted a chemical attack against Jordan’s intelligence agency.
Such a good lad.
The court did not rule Monday. Rulings typically take months.
During which Omar sits in a military prison in Iraq. Heh.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Al Qaeda-linked arrests in Utah: report
2006-04-27
According to a copyrighted article in the Salt Lake Tribune, counterterrorist agents arrested five men on Wednesday. One of the men was aprehended in the Cottonwood Heights area of Salt Lake, and the other for men were arrested in California. The men were arrested and idicted as part of an investigation into the U.S. connections of a suspected senior al-Qaida operative imprisoned in Iraq, according to the Tribune article.

For now, the federal indictments against the men - all of whom have ties to Utah and all of whom are related to accused terrorist Shawqi Omar - involve only fraud and money laundering. But FBI agents say that some of the money alleged to have been stolen in various schemes wound up in Jordan. And now they want to know whether that cash has ended up in the hands of terrorists. According to an FBI agent working with the Terrorism Task Force in Utah, the Omar family has extensive ties in Jordan, where Shawqi Omar moved his family in 1995 and where he now stands accused of helping terrorist mastermind Abu Masab al-Zarqawi plot a chemical attack.
Link


Iraq
Washington wants to extradite US ‘enemy combatant’ to Iraq
2006-02-09
The United States wants to hand over to Baghdad for trial a detained US citizen suspected of links to Iraq Al-Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the man’s lawyers said on Wednesday.

Shawqi Omar, a Sunni Muslim with both US and Kuwaiti nationality, allegedly served as Zarqawi’s personal emissary with different Iraqi insurgent groups,according to US documents released Wednesday.

Omar was detained by US forces in Iraq on October 29, 2004 and held without charge for 15 months.

In a document recently submitted to a federal court in Washington, the US government also alleged that Omar took part in staking out foreigners to be kidnapped and plotted with Zarqawi to undertake a chemical weapons attack...
I suspect we wish to extradite him to Iraq because of the fine quality of Iraqi hemp.
Link


Iraq
Former Minnesota Guardsman Linked To Al-Zarqawi
2006-02-08
The U.S. government wants an Iraqi court to handle criminal charges against a naturalized American citizen who is being held in Iraq on suspicion that he is a senior operative of insurgent leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The man's lawyers said he is innocent and likely to be tortured if he is handed over to the Iraqis.

The case is the first known instance in which the government has decided to allow an American to be tried in the new Iraqi legal system. At least four other U.S. citizens suspected of aiding the insurgency are being held in Iraq, the Pentagon has said.

Shawqi Omar, 44, who once served in the Minnesota National Guard, has been held since late 2004 in U.S.-run military prisons as an enemy combatant. He has not been charged with a crime or been given access to a lawyer, said Jonathan Hafetz, a lawyer representing Omar's family in the United States.

The government said Omar, who also holds Jordanian citizenship, was harboring an Iraqi insurgent and four Jordanian fighters at the time of his arrest and also had bomb-making materials. He is described in court papers as a relative of Zarqawi who was plotting to kidnap foreigners from Baghdad hotels.

Separately, Omar, Zarqawi and 11 others have been indicted by a Jordanian court on charges they plotted a chemical attack against Jordan's intelligence agency.

Omar's family said he is a businessman who was seeking reconstruction contracts in Iraq.

The family is asking a U.S. judge to step in and force the government to charge Omar with a crime and put him on trial in the United States, or release him. They also are seeking to prevent Omar's transfer to Iraqi custody, which they said would subject the Sunni Muslim to torture by Shiite-dominated authorities.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina last week issued an order in Washington temporarily blocking Omar's transfer to Iraqi custody. The order is set to expire on Monday, but the judge could extend it.

The Justice Department weighed in on Tuesday, arguing that Urbina has no business intervening on Omar's behalf and denying that Omar is even in U.S. custody.

Instead, the department said in court papers, Omar was captured by the U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq and remains in its custody. The multinational force is independent of the U.S. government, the department said.

In any event, Omar would not be handed over to the Iraqis unless he is convicted in an Iraqi court, the government said.

Hafetz, a lawyer at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice, said the government is resorting to a legal gimmick to keep Omar's case out of American courts. "It's legally incorrect and factually incorrect to say the U.S. does not have control of him," Hafetz said.

In July, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said five unnamed Americans, including one who also had Jordanian citizenship, were in U.S. military custody in Iraq. Whitman said then that the government had not decided whether their cases would be turned over to the Justice Department or to the new Iraqi legal system, which has handled the prosecution of other foreign fighters who came to Iraq to fight the U.S.-led occupation and Iraqi government.

In March, Matthew Waxman, the Pentagon's deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs, said a panel of three U.S. officers determined the Jordanian-American was an enemy combatant and not entitled to prisoner-of-war status under the Geneva Convention. The description provided by Waxman and other officials matches Omar's biography as contained in the government's court papers.

In its filing Tuesday, the Justice Department said the officers were part of the multinational force.

Omar became a U.S. citizen in 1986, two years after he served in the National Guard. Omar spent about 11 months in the Guard before being discharged in November 1984 without completing his training, said Shannon Purvis, a spokeswoman for the Minnesota National Guard. Omar received an "uncharacterized discharge," meaning he was discharged for such things as health problems or poor performance, Purvis said.

Non-citizens can serve in the Guard as long as they obtain citizenship within eight years of joining, Purvis said.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-6 More