Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

International-UN-NGOs
The U.N.’s Day in Court
2006-06-29
Oil-for-Food hits a New York courtroom.

By Claudia Rosett

While United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has already dismissed the Oil-for-Food scandal as over and done, within the wood-paneled walls of a Manhattan courtroom it has just come to life. The opening this week of the first federal trial linked to the U.N.’s former relief program for Iraq has transformed the distant saga of sanctions busting and stolen billions into an up-close drama, with prosecutors alleging that Saddam Hussein, in his efforts to shake off U.N. sanctions, reached via a secret “back channel” all the way from Baghdad right into Washington, New York, and the U.N. executive suite.

The defendant, South Korean businessman Tongsun Park, is charged in the Southern District of New York with acting as an unregistered agent of Saddam’s Iraq — which tried through various means, especially the manipulation of the 1996-2003 Oil-for-Food program, to end the U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddam’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Park’s lawyer, Michael Kim, says the 71-year-old Park is “absolutely not guilty.”

Whatever the outcome for Park, his trial — expected to last about three weeks — looks likely to provide an unprecedented view into the workings of U.N. backroom politics. Not least, this comes as a timely warning to beware whatever might be going on today in any back channels the U.N. might have opened with nuclear-happy, sanctions-threatened, oil-rich Iran.

In an opening statement Tuesday, federal prosecutor Michael Farbiarz told the jury that “Iraqi agents had been working since 1991 to try to eliminate the sanctions, to try and create a major exception to them on the way to wholesale elimination.” For five years, Iraq worked without success. “But starting in 1996,” alleged Farbiarz, “The Iraqi cash began flowing to Tongsun Park. It flowed all year long. Sure enough, by the end of that year…the Iraqis got their multibillion dollar exception to the UN sanctions, the so-called Oil-for-Food program.”

Alleging that “Cash by the bagful was sent from Iraq to the United States and doled out here by an Iraqi agent to Tongsun Park,” Farbiarz outlined a tale of secret swaps of messages and money in New York cafes and restaurants; night-time meetings at the Sutton Place official residence of former Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali; a close encounter with longtime U.N. eminence Maurice Strong, who served as a top adviser to both Boutros-Ghali and then to Kofi Annan; and an episode in which Park in 1997 picked up cash from Saddam’s number two man in Iraq, Tariq Aziz, and “drove out of the Iraqi desert over the Jordanian border.” (Boutros-Ghali, Strong, and Annan have all denied any wrong-doing in relation to Oil-for-Food.)

Park’s lawyer, Kim, waved aside the prosecution’s version of events as sounding “like a Tom Clancy novel.” Park, he said, was “simply a middleman, a facilitator, like everybody else who was involved in the Oil-for-Food program.” Positing that the bigger picture was “much more complicated than prosecutors would have you believe,” Kim promised to map out a web of connections including “prominent Republicans” who hob-nobbed with the same Iraqi agent alleged to have passed envelopes and bags of cash to Park, and “Texas oil companies” that saw in Oil-for-Food “a huge money-making opportunity.”

The biggest eye-opener in the trial so far is the hob-nobbing Iraqi agent, Samir Vincent, 65-years-old, with a shock of silver-gray hair, who on Tuesday took the stand. Born in Baghdad, Vincent became a naturalized U.S. citizen around 1971. Having done substantial business with Iraq over the years, including under Oil-for-Food, he was arrested in January 2005 on federal charges including engaging in prohibited financial transactions with the government of Iraq, and acting as an unregistered agent of Iraq. He pleaded guilty before the same judge now presiding over the Park trial, Denny Chin, and became a cooperating witness.

Speaking in a firm voice, with only a slight accent to suggest his Iraqi origins, Vincent in his testimony on Tuesday outlined a web of connections that led him over many years, via Baghdad and Washington, to Tongsun Park. He came to the U.S. in the late 1950s to attend Boston College, and eventually went into business for himself, in Virginia, just outside Washington. In 1984, he met the then-ambassador of Iraq, Nizar Hamdoon, an alumnus of the same Jesuit high school that Vincent had attended as a young man in Baghdad. They became good friends. Vincent began doing business with Iraq, where Hamdoon by 1990 had become deputy foreign minister. Vincent was in Baghdad when Saddam invaded Kuwait and the U.N. imposed sanctions. In the aftermath, Vincent by his own account became a conduit for messages and money from Baghdad, as Saddam’s regime sought to slip out from under those sanctions.

In the early 1990s, according to Vincent, this entailed a variety of schemes centered in Washington that simply flopped. In early 1992, he said, he hooked up with a Washington lobbyist, William E. Timmons, who had served as a congressional liaison in the Reagan administration. (Timmons did not return a call yesterday to his office at his Washington firm, Timmons and Company, where he is now listed as Chairman Emeritus). Vincent said that with the help of Timmons, he tried a number of approaches to the State Department, including a request to see John Bolton, currently the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., then assistant secretary for international organization affairs at the State Department. That resulted in meetings with “deputies of Bolton,” said Vincent, “But I never had a chance to meet with Bolton himself.”

According to Vincent, Timmons also helped him approach Elizabeth Dole, then head of the American Red Cross, with a proposal that the Red Cross take part in a plan similar to, but on a smaller scale than, what later coalesced under the U.N. as Oil-for-Food. The idea was that Iraq would be allowed to sell a limited amount of oil to buy food and medicine, all coordinated with the Red Cross. Vincent said his understanding, relayed second-hand through Timmons, was that this project died when then-Secretary of State James Baker looked over the proposal and decided it was “a no-no because he thought the Iraqis were trying to circumvent sanctions.” Baker’s view, according to Vincent, was that “if this has any chance, it has to be done under the United Nations’ auspices.”

By late 1992, according to Vincent, he and Timmons concluded that the U.S. State Department would not play ball, and Iraq should look directly to the U.N. Thus, Vincent needed access to the upper reaches of the U.N., and it was at that point, he testified Tuesday, that Timmons introduced him to Tongsun Park. Within a few weeks, “Park had arranged a meeting for us with the Secretary-General of the United Nations at the United Nations headquarters.” On that occasion, according to Vincent, it was only Park who actually went in to speak with Boutros-Ghali; Vincent waited in the outer office. But the stage was set for a series of secret meetings and maneuverings, of which we shall no doubt be hearing more in coming days.

Park’s lawyer, Michael Kim, who has not yet really begun to fight, may well produce evidence at odds with the picture that the prosecutors and Samir Vincent have begun to present. For public consumption, Tongsun Park appears to have launched his own website, complete with the information that he is “a unique personality known around the world,” but “remains humble and is always an especially gracious host.” (His lawyer, in a phone interview Tuesday evening, could not confirm that this is genuinely Park’s website, and Park, who is in federal custody, could not be reached for comment.)

Even after this very preliminary bout, what jumps out is that, in contrast to the folks at the U.N., at least some of the private players who got caught up in the epic scandal that was Oil-for-Food have by now had to tangle with prosecutors, or at least have been required to face inquiries conducted in broad daylight. Also under federal indictment are a number of Saddam’s former business partners, who face trial in the Southern District of New York this November. In Australia, the Cole Commission has been delving in public hearings into misconduct under Oil-for-Food.

But at the U.N. itself, which actually ran Oil-for-Food, not a single official involved in the administration of the program, from Kofi Annan on down, has been required to come forth and tell, in public, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Top U.N. officials have declined invitations to testify at congressional hearings and stonewalled questions from the press. They have tucked under the rug of diplomatic immunity and silence a great many loose ends left by Paul Volcker’s U.N.-authorized probe, which covered some of the material now spilling into the New York courtroom, but did all its questioning in secret and is now hiding from the public its entire archive of underlying documents. No one at Turtle Bay seems even interested that the former director of Oil-for-Food, Benon Sevan, alleged by Volcker to have taken $147,000 in payoffs on Iraqi oil deals, is protesting innocence, uncontested, receiving full U.N. pension and living on Cyprus. Watching Tongsun Park's trial begin on Tuesday, and listening to testimony that is opening one can of worms after another, I had to wonder, were the U.N. subject to a similar standard of law, what might we learn?
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Former UN chief named in Oil-for-Food scandal
2006-06-28
Saddam Hussein’s regime paid millions of dollars to a South Korean businessman to create a “secret backchannel” to top UN officials, including Boutros Boutros Ghali, then the UN Secretary-General, US prosecutors alleged today. The claim, formally naming Dr Boutros Ghali for the first time, was made at the start of the first US trial over the UN’s Oil-for-Food scandal. Prosecutors said that Tongsun Park received $2.5 million (£1.4 million) in cash plus promises of lucrative business deals in return for providing access to Dr Boutros Ghali and at least one other top UN official.

“Tongsun Park has access at the highest levels of the UN. Tongsun Park had his price. Tongsun Park sold his access to the UN. He sold it to the Iraqis,” Michael Farbiarz, a federal prosecutor, told the jury. “Cash by the bagful was sent to the US and doled out to Tongsun Park by an agent for Iraq.” The prosecution did not allege that Dr Boutros Ghali had received any money during negotiations on the creation of the $64 billion humanitarian programme in 1996. But Mr Farbiarz said that the money Iraq paid to Mr Park appeared to have had its desired effect.

Mr Park, 71, who was born in North Korea, faces up to 12 years in prison on charges that he acted as an unregistered foreign agent for Saddam’s Iraq during and after the creation of the programme. Prosecutors alleged that Mr Park was recruited by Samir Vincent, an Iraqi-American businessman, who has admitted working illegally for Saddam’s Iraq. Mr Vincent handed Mr Park large sums of cash, prosecutors allege. But it was “just a down payment”, and both men were promised business deals once sanctions were lifted.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Iraq tried to bribe former UN chief Boutros Ghali
2005-09-08
UNITED NATIONS - Iraq paid more than $1 million in cash to bribe former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros Ghali but investigators said they had no evidence he ever received the money.
Covered his tracks, did he?
The findings were contained in a 1,000 page report by the UN appointed Independent Inquiry Committee, set up to investigate the defunct $64 billion oil-for-food humanitarian program for Iraq.

Boutros-Ghali was in office in 1996 when the program was created that allowed Iraq to sell oil in order to buy food, medicine and offset the impact of 1990 UN sanctions. During negotiations to set up the program, “the back channel discussions evolved into something more: an Iraqi scheme to bribe Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali in order to ensure that he would be flexible,” the report said. But the report said it had no evidence that Boutros Ghali was aware of Iraq’s intentions or received any money.

The money was to have been passed through Iraqi American businessman, Samir Vincent, and Tongsun Park, a South Korean lobbyist. Both are accused by federal prosecutors of attempting to bribe UN officials.
"Legume! Round up the usual suspects!"
Link


International-UN-NGOs
UN linked to Iraqi oil-for-food agent
2005-04-15
The United Nations suffered a further blow on Thursday when US authorities revealed that at least one high-ranking official in the organisation might have been bribed in connection with the Iraq oil-for-food programme by a South Korean lobbyist for the Baghdad government.

The disclosure, in a complaint by the US attorney for the southern district of New York, came as criminal charges were also brought against three businessmen linked to Bayoil, a Texan oil company said to have played a "pivotal" role in subverting the humanitarian relief scheme.

The indictments, which target allegedly central figures in the scandal, mark a significant step forward by investigating authorities. They follow two damaging reports carried out by a separate UN-appointed independent inquiry led Paul Volcker which found severe flaws in the oversight of the programme.

According to David Kelley, the attorney, Park Tongsun, a Korean working on behalf of Saddam Hussein's regime, conspired to influence the design of the multi-billion dollar oil-for-food programme in the 1990s.

The charges allege that Mr Park met senior UN officials in New York and Geneva, and received at least $2m for his services from the Iraqi government, delivered in cash in diplomatic pouches.

"It was allegedly understood . . . that some of the money would be used by Park to 'take care' of [one high-ranking] UN official," the charges say.

Having never registered in the US as an agent of the Iraqi government, as required by American law, Mr Park, if found guilty, faces a maximum five years in prison, plus a fine. Mr Kelley said on Thursday that Mr Park was believed to be in South Korea.

According to the charges, in 1992 Mr Park started working with an unnamed, co-operative witness, believed to be Samir Vincent, the first American to be charged in connection with the investigations.

In February 1993 Mr Park arranged a meeting at the Manhattan home of the high-ranking UN official. In March he met the official again in Manhattan, and in June in Geneva. In late 1995, Mr Park told the witness he needed $10m to "take care" of "his expenses and his people".

In January 1996 he asked for the money to be wired to a bank account in London. The following month Iraq also agreed to pay money to a bank account in the Channel Islands.

Later, when Iraq threatened to cut off funds, Mr Park arranged a meeting in a Manhattan restaurant attended by a second high-ranking UN official. After that official left, Mr Park allegedly told the witness he had used a $5m guarantee to "fund business dealings" with the second official.

The indictment also alleges that Mr Park invested $1m in a Canadian company set up by the son of the second high-ranking UN official, but "the money was lost because this Canadian company failed soon after".

Separately, David Chalmers, head of Bayoil, a Texas oil company, and two associates were charged with taking part in a scheme to pay "millions of dollars in secret kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime".

Mr Kelley said Mr Chalmers, John Irving, a London-based oil trader, and Ludmil Dionissiev, a Bulgarian resident in the US, "conspired to deflate the official selling price of Iraqi oil" by giving UN overseers "fraudulent information".

Lawyers for Mr Chalmers and Mr Dionissiev said their clients would plead not guilty.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Kofi questioned thrice in UNSCAM probe
2005-01-26
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) was on Tuesday questioned for a third time by the commission investigating the scandal-tainted Iraq (news - web sites) oil-for-food program, a U.N. spokesman said.

Annan has appointed Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve (news - web sites), to lead a probe of the $67 billion program, set up in late 1996 to allow civilian goods into Iraq in an effort to ease the impact of U.N. sanctions.

"He has met more than once for an extended period of time with Mr. Volcker and his investigators," U.N. spokesman Fred Eckhard said in answer to queries.

He originally said two interviews took place last year but later updated the information, saying the latest round was on Tuesday afternoon and lasted one hour and 35 minutes. Previous interviews were conducted on Nov. 9 for one hour and 45 minutes and on Dec. 3 for 25 minutes.

"Yes, the secretary-general is part of the investigation, is subject like anyone else involved in oil-for-food in the secretariat," Eckhard said. "He has been questioned and most likely will continued to be questioned as Mr Volcker's investigation continues."

The spokesman said the meetings took place in Annan's office at U.N. headquarters. Volcker is due to give a preliminary report at the end of the month or early in February.

Among the allegations is that Kojo Annan, the U.N. leader's son, was paid a total of $125,000 by Geneva-based firm Cotecna, which inspected goods coming to Iraq. U.N. officials have denied Annan was aware or involved in contract negotiations.

The payments were part of an agreement for the younger Annan, who worked in West Africa rather than Iraq, not to join a firm competing with Cotecna after he left the company, Eckhard said previously.

CIA (news - web sites) weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, in a report in October, said Saddam reaped some $1.7 billion by subverting the program. Iraq also sold $8 billion in oil outside of the program, to Jordan, Syria and Turkey, which the Security Council, including the United States, knew about.

Volcker said earlier this month his probe has not turned up a smoking gun.

"You know his son was employed by this company, you know he knew his son was employed by the company, you know a few other things, but suppose you have no evidence Kofi influenced the process," Volcker told the New York Times.

"You find an e-mail, or somebody who's squealing, then you have the proof, but without it you're left with the difficult task of trying to prove a negative," Volcker said.

More recently Samir Vincent, 64, a naturalized U.S. citizen, pleaded guilty in New York of taking millions of dollars from Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s government in exchange for lobbying U.S. and U.N. officials.

Vincent is the first known suspect who can shed light on how Saddam subverted and worked around the program and Volcker has asked to interview him.
Link


Home Front: Politix
NY Post sez Jack Kemp may have shilled for Sammy
2005-01-26
A blistering letter written by former vice-presidential candidate Jack Kemp to congressional leaders, criticizing the 1998 U.S. bombing of Iraq, has raised new questions about whether he was promoting a secret agenda on behalf of Saddam Hussein's oil spy in the United States, The Post has learned.

Kemp's Dec. 18, 1998, letter to then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), which called for congressional hearings into the Clinton administration's decision to bomb Iraq, has left investigators wondering whether he was pushing "talking points" drawn up by Virginia oil trader Samir Vincent, who pleaded guilty last week to charges that he received payments from Iraq to weaken U.N sanctions.

In the letter, Kemp — who has been questioned by the FBI about his contacts with Vincent — blasted U.S. policy and raised numerous Iraqi propaganda points.

Kemp asked, for example, if it was true "that around 4,500 children under the age of five are dying" in Iraq every month, and whether the U.S. government was refusing to have "direct contact with Iraq."

"The Iraqi government believes that nothing it can do will cause the United States to allow the economic sanctions to be lifted," Kemp said in the letter.

"Is it realistic to expect any regime to cooperate with U.N. inspectors if it believes the U.S. has declared de facto war on it and that nothing it can do will lead to a lifting of sanctions?" Kemp added.

Vincent was making eerily similar points to Kemp during their once-a-month meetings during the same period, Kemp's office admitted.

In a statement issued by Kemp's office, Empower America, over the weekend, the former upstate GOP congressman and Buffalo Bill football star said he believed Vincent was "motivated by the national security of the United States and thought the Iraqi government believed the sanctions could never be lifted, which he said he believed was leading them to obstruct inspectors from coming into the country."

One congressional official involved in the U.N. oil-for-food investigation said, "Knowing what we know now, the question is: Where did Jack Kemp get this stuff?

"It looks like Samir Vincent did a very good lobbying job."

Andrew Porter, spokesman for Empower America, said Vincent played no role in the drafting of Kemp's letter to Lott.

Vincent admitted in federal court last week that he was paid $3 million to $5 million by Saddam to lobby American officials against sanctions.

Kemp, Bob Dole's running mate in 1996, admitted he was questioned by the FBI about his relationship with Vincent last October.

He has said he and Vincent worked behind the scenes on a plan to persuade the Clinton and Bush administrations to consider phasing out sanctions in return for Iraq's agreement to "robust" U.N. weapons inspections.

Kemp denied there were any business or financial dealings with Vincent, who is Iraqi-born, saying they talked only about "policy."

Kemp's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said last week that he believes Kemp was duped by Vincent and did not know Vincent was on Saddam's payroll.

Kemp's letter and other speeches and media interviews opposing the Clinton administration's bombing of Iraq were controversial at the time and represented a break with many of his conservative political and intellectual supporters.
Link


Home Front: WoT
More on Iraqi-American Samir Vincent's guilty plea
2005-01-24
From the Wall Street Journal. Behind the subscription wall, so given here uncut.

The United Nations Oil for Food scandal continues to effloresce, moving last week into the criminal realm. Iraqi-American Samir Vincent's guilty plea shows that Saddam Hussein was indeed exploiting the program to buy influence around the world--including in the U.S.--and suggests there is far more to be uncovered.

Mr. Vincent pleaded guilty Tuesday in Federal District Court in New York to acting as an unregistered foreign agent for Saddam's Iraq and to related conspiracy and tax-evasion charges. According to the charge sheet prepared by U.S. Attorney David Kelley, he "consulted with and repeatedly received direction from the Government of Iraq in the course of lobbying officials of the United States Government and the United Nations." For his efforts, Mr. Vincent confesses, he was personally awarded five separate oil allocations worth millions of dollars under Oil for Food. He faces potential penalties of up to 28 years in prison.

So, precisely what services did Saddam Hussein deem that valuable? A full answer likely will have to wait for what U.S. Attorney Kelley tells us is an "ongoing investigation"--in which Mr. Vincent has agreed to cooperate--to further its course. But the charge sheet refers tantalizingly to efforts by Mr. Vincent and unnamed others "including United Nations officials . . . to secure terms favorable to Iraq in connection with the adoption and implementation of [Security Council] Resolution 986," which created the Oil for Food program. That suggests Saddam understood from the start that Oil for Food was a chance to evade U.N. sanctions and prop up his regime.

The charge sheet also describes what appear to be extensive lobbying efforts over many years involving "former officials of the United States Government who maintained close contacts to high-ranking members of both the Clinton and Bush Administrations" in an effort to fully repeal sanctions. "Vincent reported the results of those consultations to the Iraqi Intelligence Service," the charges state.

Like any good prosecutor, U.S. Attorney Kelley refuses to speculate on the next steps in his investigation. But another American whose name has surfaced in connection with Oil for Food is Detroit-area businessman Shakir al-Khafaji. Like Mr. Vincent, Mr. Khafaji appeared on lists of individuals alleged to have received oil allocations from Saddam.

As our Robert Pollock reported last March based on information from an Iraqi intelligence source, those oil vouchers may have been similarly intended as part of an influence-buying campaign here in the U.S. Mr. Khafaji financed an anti-sanctions documentary by former U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, and he brought a Congressional delegation headed by former House Minority Whip David Bonior to Iraq, among other activities. A third American alleged to have received oil vouchers is Texas tycoon Oscar Wyatt, a longtime acquaintance of Saddam who opposed the first Gulf War.

Saddam's influence-buying was ineffective when it came to the U.S. But remember that prior to 9/11 and President Bush's decision to promote democracy in the Middle East, there was a growing consensus in the U.S. foreign policy establishment in favor of "smart" (i.e., relaxed) sanctions on Iraq. We'd be curious to know if the smart sanctions proponents were among Mr. Vincent's associates.

And of course Saddam's buy-them-off strategy was far more extensive--and arguably successful--as regards the rest of the world. Why did France, Russia and the U.N. Security Council refuse to approve force despite Saddam's flagrant violation of 17 different resolutions? Last week's news makes it still harder to claim with a straight face that this type of corruption, or at least fear of its exposure, had nothing to do with the refusal to oust Saddam.

The Oil for Food scandal is at its roots about whether the current U.N.-centric global security architecture is hopelessly vulnerable to corruption or can be trusted to perform. That's why every serious internationalist should be paying close attention to investigations like Mr. Kelley's and that of the U.N. panel led by Paul Volcker.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Unraveling the UN Gordian Knot: Another Thread Pulled
2005-01-23
American prosecutors are investigating claims that a second senior United Nations official involved in the oil-for-food scheme may have been paid off by Saddam Hussein after an Iraqi-born American businessman struck a plea-bargain deal last week. The testimony of Samir Vincent, who pleaded guilty to acting as a covert agent for Baghdad, indicates that Saddam's manipulation of the scheme began at its inception in 1996. Attention has previously focused on how, from 1998, Iraq skimmed off proceeds from the programme and issued vouchers for oil sales to its foreign supporters. In his testimony, however, Vincent, 64, detailed links with the Iraqi regime dating back to 1992. He made the claim that a UN official, who has not yet been named publicly, received cash payments from iraq in 1996 in his statement submitted as a "co-operating witness" to the United States federal court in Manhattan. A copy of the papers has been obtained by The Telegraph.

According to the indictment, Vincent was among a group of Iraqi officials and agents who agreed on the scheme to reward those who co-operated with Saddam with the oil vouchers. For his part, Vincent was allegedly rewarded with five oil contracts which he sold for between $3 million and $5 million. Federal prosecutors in New York and congressional investigators in Washington believe that the evidence of the former Iraqi Olympic athlete, who became a wealthy US oil trader with connections at the top of the Republican and Democrat parties, represents a crucial breakthrough that will lead to further indictments. Benon Sevan, the former head of the oil-for-food programme from which Saddam skimmed at least $1.7 billion, is already under investigation by federal prosecutors.
Wonder if his UN diplomatic immunity applies?
A CIA report published earlier this month claimed that Mr Sevan was allocated vouchers by Saddam to sell 7.3 million barrels of Iraqi oil through a Panamanian-registered company. According to the UN, Mr Sevan's name may have been used by a corrupt Iraqi official in a scheme to line his own pockets. Mr Sevan has denied any wrongdoing.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
OFF: More details on the Jimmy Carter and Jack Kemp Connections
2005-01-21
Former President Jimmy Carter was a target of the clandestine lobby campaign launched by an Iraqi-American businessman who admitted he was paid millions of dollars to undermine U.S. policy toward Iraq, it was revealed yesterday.

Virginia-based oilman Samir Vincent earlier this week became the first person to plead guilty in the U.N. oil-for-food scandal. He had several contacts with the former Democratic president in a bid to weaken and eventually repeal sanctions against Saddam Hussein's regime, investigators said.

Contacts with Vincent dated back to 1999, when Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, hosted a delegation of Iraqi religious leaders at their home in Plains, Ga. The Iraqis were in the country to lobby American religious leaders — including the Rev. Billy Graham — against U.N. sanctions on Iraq, imposed after Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Vincent organized the trip.

Later that year, Carter disclosed that he was trying to send his son, Chip, as well as Billy Graham's son, Franklin, to Iraq to "give publicity to the plight of the people in Iraq who are suffering."

Carter, who was in Washington to attend President Bush's inauguration yesterday, could not be reached for comment.

Vincent testified in federal court in Manhattan on Tuesday that he was paid millions of dollars by Saddam's regime for lobbying.

Among Vincent's American contacts was former GOP vice-presidential nominee and ex-New York Rep. Jack Kemp, who acknowledged working with him on a proposal to ease the economic sanctions if Iraq would readmit U.N. weapons inspectors.

In 1999, Kemp took those proposals to then-Defense Secretary William Cohen — and again in 2001, to Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Colin Powell, said Washington lawyer Lanny Davis, who was speaking for Kemp. In his discussions with Powell and Cheney, Kemp said he wanted to go to Baghdad to pitch his plan with the younger Graham, who is an associate of Carter, Davis said. Kemp was rebuffed.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Sources: Volcker May Be Too Close to U.N.
2005-01-20
WASHINGTON — Several lawmakers are concerned Paul Volcker is too close to the United Nations to carry out a truly objective investigation of the Oil-for-Food program. "He's more interested in protecting the United Nations than investigating what happened," one congressional source familiar with the investigation told FOX News. Volcker, who is heading up a U.N.-appointed commission probing the scandal-ridden Oil-for-Food program, was tapped by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. That in itself worried some congressional investigators. But Volcker's longstanding ties to the international organization and a new revelation uncovered by FOX News have heightened those fears.
The latest news centers on Volcker's relationship with the UNA-USA Business Council, a powerful group that has been highly vocal in its support for the United Nations since news came out that Iraq's Oil-for-Food program was plagued with mismanagement problems and lack of oversight. Volcker was on the board of directors of the council until last year and hasn't ruled out going back once he concludes his investigation. One congressional source said, "That's really scary."
Sounds like business as usual for the UN
FOX News has also learned that one of the three biggest financial contributors to the UNA-USA Business Council in 2003 was the French bank BNP Paribas, which handled all Oil-for-Food transactions and is at the center of Volcker's investigation.
So Volcker is investigating the bank that cuts his paycheck?
Yeah, no conflict of interest there.
Sources on Capitol Hill also expressed concern about playing down the significance of the internal U.N. audits released last week. Before they were made public, Volcker told the New York Times that "there are no flaming red flags in this stuff." But congressional investigators doing their own review of the program found what they called a "forest of red flags." Those investigators also were furious with Volcker's characterization. "He's trying to minimize his own investigation's findings. That's inappropriate spin. It legitimately brings into question what's his purpose," one investigator told FOX News.
John Danforth, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said he had confidence in Volcker's veracity. "He is a very, very able person who is trying to do an excellent job and will do an excellent job with those tools that are available to him," he said. Danforth, whose last day on the diplomacy job was Tuesday, had earlier told FOX News that despite Volcker's good intentions, he did not have the tools necessary — such as subpoena power — to effectively investigate the multibillion-dollar program.
A spokeswoman for the Volcker commission, formally known as the Independent Inquiry Committee, would not respond to specific questions asked by FOX News about potential conflicts of interests, saying simply that the panel will let the report speak for itself. That report is due to be released by the end of the month.
Minnesota Sen. Norm Coleman told FOX News on Wednesday he saw signs that the investigation is going in the right direction. Coleman, a Republican who is leading one of five congressional probes into Oil-for-Food, saw progress with Tuesday's guilty plea by an Iraqi-born American citizen, Samir Vincent, to several charges tied to the program. He said Vincent's plea is further proof that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was illegally bilking millions from the program that was aimed at feeding and clothing Iraqi civilians in his country.
"First it shows that there is some validity to the list we got from the Iraqis that said that Saddam Hussein was bribing people to act as agents of his government 
 we've got someone now who's pled guilty to doing what our investigators have understood for quite a while now," Coleman said.
When asked if Volcker was the right man to head such a high-profile probe, Coleman had nothing less than personal accolades for the former Federal Reserve chairman, but said he was waiting to see the results of Volcker's investigation.
"I think he has challenges in trying to do what he's going to do, but we'll see. We've gotten some preliminary documents from him so far, which we're pleased to get, but in terms of what he's produced we're waiting to see," Coleman said. "But there's a lot here in this Oil-for-Food scandal and it's a scandal 
 I wish Paul Volcker the best. We're certainly willing to work with him. But this is more then just one person, one investigation, to get to the bottom of it."
Link


Home Front: WoT
Iraqi-American pleads guilty in oil-for-food case
2005-01-20
An Iraqi-American businessman pleaded guilty to acting and conspiring to act as an unregistered agent of the Iraqi government in relation to the UN oil-for-food programme, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced. Samir Vincent faced as many as 28 years in prison. He entered his plea in a New York court. Vincent is alleged to have been paid for his work - some three-to-five million dollars according to early estimates - on behalf of the Iraqi government in connection with the scandal-plagued UN programme. He "was able to reap profits totaling millions of dollars by reselling these five allocations of Iraqi oil to an oil company," Ashcroft said Tuesday of the naturalized US citizen. Ashcroft added: "Today we know that from the moment the Oil-for-Food program was introduced, (deposed Iraqi dictator) Saddam Hussein and his agents attempted to subvert it, working the system so that profits were diverted to fund a brutal regime rather than to feed the people of Iraq," Ashcroft said.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
Jimmy Carter linked to oil-for-food scam
2005-01-20
Former President Jimmy Carter has been linked with a key figure in the U.N.'s oil-for-food scandal by the group leading the nationwide effort to evict the United Nations from American soil and halt U.S. funding of the U.N. Move America Forward today will call upon Carter to provide a full accounting of his meetings and conversations with Samir Vincent, who yesterday pleaded guilty to participating in numerous illegal activities as part of the U.N. scandal. "One of two things happened," suggests Morgan. "Either President Carter was totally duped, and allowed himself to be conned into working as an indirect agent of Saddam Hussein, or President Carter knowingly associated himself with a foreign agent who was seeking to undermine American foreign policy."
"No more working for peanuts! Let's get some liquidity going on!"
Yes, Jimmah is rather old, so some degree of senility and gullibility is to be expected. Perhaps that is exactly what he was counting on. It may be about oil, after all...
Link


-12 More