Terror Networks |
Hicks pleads guilty |
2007-03-27 |
![]() At the pretrial hearing, Hicks asked for more lawyers to help defend him against charges he supported al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, but the presiding military officer instead ordered two civilian attorneys to leave the defense table, leaving the defendant with one attorney. The heavyset 31-year-old Hicks, wearing a khaki prison jumpsuit, had told the court he was satisfied with his defense team but wanted more lawyers and paralegals "to get equality with the prosecution." The judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, instead said two civilian lawyers, including a Defense Department attorney, were not authorized to represent Hicks. He ordered them to leave the defense table when Hicks said he wouldn't settle for them being designated consultants. One of the lawyers, Joshua Dratel, said he refused to sign an agreement to abide by tribunal rules because he was concerned the provisions did not allow him to meet with his client in private. "I'm shocked because I just lost another lawyer," Hicks said after Dratel's departure, drawing a scolding from the judge for interrupting as he explained the reasoning for removing the lawyers. Hicks' Pentagon-appointed attorney, Marine Maj. Michael Mori, challenged Kohlmann's partiality, arguing that his participation in the previous round of military trials that the Supreme Court last year found to be illegal created the appearance of bias. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Detainee Says He Was Abused While in U.S. Custody |
2007-03-20 |
![]() Yes, it's our boy David's latest Sad Tale of Big Bad Jihadi Woe. Which is eaten right up by the New York Times, of course... LONDON, March 19 David Hicks, the first detainee to be formally charged under the new military tribunal rules at Guantánamo Bay, has alleged in a court document filed here that during more than five years in American custody he was beaten several times during interrogations and witnessed the abuse of other prisoners. Just "several times"? I'm disappointed. In an affidavit supporting his request for British citizenship, Mr. Hicks contends that before he arrived at Guantánamo, his American captors threw him and other detainees on the ground, walked on them, stripped him naked, shaved all his body hair and inserted a plastic object in his rectum. I wonder if he liked it? The abuse, Mr. Hicks asserts, began during interrogations in Afghanistan, where he was captured in late 2001. It then continued while he was shuttled between American naval ships, aircraft, unknown buildings and Kandahar before he was taken to the military detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, in early 2002, according to the affidavit. While Mr. Hicks did not claim that he was tortured at Guantánamo, he said he was given regular, mysterious injections that would make my head feel strange. He also said he witnessed or heard about mistreatment of others there. A detainee with only one leg was set upon by a special military team and its dogs, he said. The man was dragged out of his cell, and there was blood on his face and the cell floor. It put me in such fear that I just knew I would cooperate in any way with the U.S. David! Is that any way for a Big Brave Jihadi to act? A spokesman for the military commission, Cmdr. J. D. Gordon, described Mr. Hickss allegations as false, and completely lacking in merit. Hicks has make a number of allegations in the past, which have proven to be unsubstantiated and completely lacking in merit, Commander Gordon said. For example, he said Mr. Hicks had once alleged that he was shackled to the floor for 22 hours a day, which Commander Gordon said was untrue. We wish it were true, but it's not. Mr. Hicks is Australian, but his mother was born in Britain; he has been seeking citizenship here because he believes that the British government has done more to secure the release of its citizens in Guantánamo than Australia has. And Weenie Boy wants out! At an American military commission hearing scheduled for March 26, Mr. Hicks will plead not guilty to a single charge of providing material support for terrorism, his military lawyer, Maj. Michael Mori, has said. The initial charges against Mr. Hicks, including attempted murder and aiding the enemy, have been dropped. Major Moris aggressive defense of Mr. Hicks continues to draw fire from the chief prosecutor of the military commission, Col. Morris Davis. In an e-mail message last week to the judge who oversees the military commissions, Colonel Davis said that Major Mori appeared to have violated Article 88 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which prohibits an officer from using contemptuous words against the president, vice president, secretary of defense and other senior officials. Colonel Davis cited numerous statements by Major Mori on his trips to Australia that he said could be considered insulting or rude. A copy of the message, from Colonel Davis to Judge Susan Crawford, was provided to The New York Times by someone who supports Major Mori. I wonder if they could be arrested for that? Maybe become David's new roomate? Major Mori declined to comment on Colonel Daviss latest criticisms. Earlier this month, after Colonel Davis first voiced disapproval of Major Moris conduct, Major Mori said that it might force him to withdraw from the case. Commander Gordon, the commission spokesman, declined to discuss Colonel Daviss message, calling it an internal staff matter. Sean Penn is,.."Major Mori". Coming soon to a theatre near you! In Australia, Major Mori is widely credited with having changed the public attitude toward Mr. Hicks. At the time of his arrest, Mr. Hicks was often described in Australias tabloids as Australias Taliban. Now, across the political spectrum, there is pressure on Prime Minister John Howard to have Mr. Hicks returned to Australia soon. Major Mori has also been praised by former detainees for his representation. Thanks, major. We'll kill you last... Australian intelligence officials have said that Mr. Hicks went to Afghanistan to train with Al Qaeda. For his part, Mr. Hicks said he was seized by the Northern Alliance, which was fighting with the Americans against the Taliban, and was treated well for two weeks. Yeah, I'll bet it was a real party. They loved the Taliban... When the U.S. interrogators showed up my treatment changed, Mr. Hicks said in the affidavit, which was filed in December but has remained largely unnoticed. He said he was interrogated by five Americans, who were dressed in black combat gear without any insignia.The U.S. interrogators would question me, he said, and after my responses I would be slapped in the back of the head and told I was lying. At one point, he said, he was forced to sit on a window ledge, and outside there were six American soldiers with their weapons pointed at him, he wrote. One interrogator, obviously agitated, took out his pistol and aimed it at me, with his hand shaking violently with rage. It was at this point, he said, I realized that if I did not cooperate with U.S. interrogators, I might be shot. So what? You'd be a martyr. I thought that was the big jackpot all you mooks were looking for? He said was taken to the amphibious assault ship Peleliu, which he knew because of announcements over the public address system. Among the detainees was John Walker Lindh, the American who later pleaded guilty to serving with the Taliban and is now serving 20 years. Commander Gordon said the military would not discuss whether Mr. Hicks was held on ships, but noted that it was a matter of public record that Mr. Lindh was held on the Peleliu. On board, Mr. Hicks said he could hear other detainees screaming in pain when being interrogated. That's why they call it an "amphibious assault" ship, moron... He said he was later transferred to the amphibious assault ship Bataan, where he said conditions became drastically worse. He was fed only a handful of rice or fruit three times a day, the affidavit asserts, and on several occasions, he and other detainees, blindfolded, hooded and handcuffed, were thrown onto helicopters and taken to hangar-like buildings in an unknown location. They were forced to kneel for 10 hours, during which time I was hit in the back of the head with the butt of a rifle several times (hard enough to knock me over), slapped in the back of the head, kicked, stepped on, and spat on, he said. I could hear the groans and cries of other detainees. He was flown back to the ship, and a few days later back to a hangar. A week or so later, he was flown to Kandahar, where he and other detainees were forced to lie face down in the mud while solders walked across our backs. He was stripped, his body hair shaved and a piece of white plastic was forcibly inserted in my rectum for no apparent purpose, he wrote. Soldiers made crude comments about the insertion, he said. Jeez, David. Not what you signed up for, was it? Commander Gordon said he had no knowledge of such treatment. Some former detainees have made similar accusations, including Mamdouh Habib, an Australian who was picked up in Pakistan, turned over to the United States and delivered to Egypt, where he says he was badly tortured. At Guantánamo, Mr. Hicks said he was also shown a picture of Mr. Habib. In the photo, Habibs face was black and blue, Mr. Hicks wrote. I first thought it was a photo of a corpse, he said, adding that an interrogator told him that if he did not cooperate he would be sent to Egypt to suffer the same fate. This regular brutality left me in a heightened state of fear and anxiety about my own safety, Mr. Hicks wrote in the affidavit. Now, now, my Brave Jihadi. Wipe those tears away. Allah will make it all okay... After Mr. Hicks was formally charged earlier this month, Australian officials said publicly that they hoped a plea bargain allowing Mr. Hicks to come home could be negotiated. Two American officials close to the case said they expected that the deal would be for Mr. Hicks to plead guilty to the one charge, in exchange for the five years he has already been held. They should've shot this pussified bag of shit when they had the chance, if only so we wouldn't have to listen to him whine like a little girl for the last five years. |
Link |
Down Under | |
Official blasts Gitmo inmate's lawyers | |
2007-01-21 | |
![]()
Downer was quoted Thursday as saying that Hicks met recently with an unidentified foreign citizen. "There was no suggestion that he was suffering from mental illness, though no doubt he doesn't like being in Guantanamo Bay," Downer told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio. Hick's legal team has been reported as saying that the visitor was a U.S. consular official with no special medical or psychiatric qualifications. Downer also said Friday that Hicks, 31, will face new charges to replace previous charges of attempted murder, conspiracy to commit war crimes and aiding the enemy. Hicks was originally selected to face a U.S. military tribunal but his case was thrown into limbo in June when the U.S. Supreme Court declared the tribunals illegal. Australian officials say they have received assurances that Hicks will be among the first to be charged and tried under a revised military tribunal system approved by Congress last year. | |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | |
U.S. Delays Gitmo Trial for Hicks | |
2004-11-04 | |
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba (AP) - The U.S. military trial of an Australian cowboy accused of fighting for Afghanistan's ousted Taliban regime was delayed Wednesday to allow his lawyers more time to interview witnesses and review evidence. Army Col. Peter E. Brownback, the presiding officer for the first U.S. military commissions to be held since World War II, granted the delay to allow for "full and fair" proceedings for David Hicks. His Jan. 10 trial was delayed until March 15. Brownback also deferred decisions on several other pretrial motions for Hicks, including defense requests to drop charges of attempted murder, aiding the enemy and conspiracy to attack civilians, commit terrorism and destroy property, which could bring a life sentence. Hicks has pleaded innocent to all charges. "One of the difficulties of this case is that it is a worldwide investigation," Maj. Michael Mori, Hicks' military-appointed defense lawyer, told The Associated Press. "We need to talk to witnesses. We'll need to travel to several places. We may need time to get translators and we'll likely move to suppress some of the information," said John Dratel, Hicks' civilian attorney. The government has accused Hicks, 29, of taking up arms against U.S. and coalition forces, and training with the al-Qaida terror network - allegations his defense team says should not be considered war crimes or tried in a military commission. The defense has not received a complete list of government witnesses, or been shown all the evidence. The attorneys may see the classified evidence but not share it with Hicks. Pretrial hearings in Hicks' case began Monday. His attorneys argued that charges involving conspiracy and terrorism weren't valid under international law. They also attacked the contention that U.S. laws do not apply to some 550 detainees from more than 40 countries imprisoned at the outpost in Cuba.
| |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Hicks charged |
2004-07-12 |
The Pentagon announced three criminal charges yesterday against David Hicks, an Australian held at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, accusing him of conspiracy to commit war crimes, attempted murder and aiding the enemy. The move made Hicks, who was captured in Afghanistan in December 2001, the third captive at Guantanamo Bay -- and the first citizen of a U.S. ally imprisoned there -- to be charged with terrorism-related offenses. He will face trial under the controversial military tribunal process devised for some of those apprehended in government's war on terrorism. According to the Pentagon charge sheet, Hicks, 28, a high school dropout and convert to Islam who has done stints as a cowboy, boxer, shark fisherman and kangaroo skinner, attended several al Qaeda training courses at camps in Afghanistan in 2001. Leaving the country briefly, he returned after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to fight alongside al Qaeda and Taliban members. Marine Maj. Michael Mori, a military lawyer representing Hicks, said his client has not committed any crime and would fight the charges. "What's not in the charges is almost more telling than what is," Mori said in a telephone interview. "There is no statement that David Hicks shot any service member or planted any bombs." In outlining its case, the Pentagon said Hicks trained in Albania in 1999 with the Kosovo Liberation Army and fought for Albanian Muslims. He converted from Christianity to Islam and, in early 2000, joined an Islamic extremist group in Pakistan known as Lashkar-e-Taiba, or Army of the Righteous, participating in clashes with Indian forces in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. In January 2001, Hicks traveled to Afghanistan to attend al Qaeda terrorist training camps, where he took courses on weapons, urban tactics, guerrilla warfare and other military-related subjects, the Pentagon said. As part of a course on information gathering, Hicks conducted surveillance of various targets in Kabul, including "the U.S. and British embassies," according to the charge sheet. At that time, though, neither the United States nor Britain operated an embassy in the Afghan capital. A spokesman for the military tribunals said yesterday that the reference was to buildings once used as embassies and still occupied, when Hicks allegedly spied on them, by employees of the United States and Britain. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | |
David Hicks to be put on trial | |
2004-06-10 | |
David Hicks, an Australian held at the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been charged with conspiring with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, the Pentagon announced Thursday. Hicks is charged with conspiracy to commit war crimes, attempted murder by an unprivileged belligerent and aiding the enemy. The military alleges Hicks attended several Al Qaeda training courses at camps in Afghanistan, left the country, and returned after the Sept. 11 attacks to fight alongside Al Qaeda and the Taliban. His attorney said Hicks is innocent.
| |
Link |