Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Raisi Offends Iranian Government
2017-05-31
[Asharq al-Aswat] Ten days after the presidential elections, repercussions of the electoral campaigns still threaten of wider divisions in Tehran. On Monday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was offended by his rivals: defeated presidential candidate Ebrahim Raisi and head of Judiciary Sadeq Larijani.

In his first speech after losing the elections, Raisi said on Sunday that Rouhani’s government has committed huge violations through tampering the elections.

"I ask the Guardian Council and the judiciary not to let the people’s rights get trampled. If this vote-tampering is not looked into, then the people’s trust will be damaged," said Raisi.

He lost the presidential competition for 16 million votes compared to 23 million votes to Rouhani.

Rouhani criticized last week the Guardian Council and the Ministry of Interior for not allowing four million Iranians to participate in the presidential elections, considering those who did not participate supporters of him.

Raisi, on the other hand, accused Rouhani of having inappropriately used TV, newspapers and government offices for campaign purposes throughout the five months, preceding the elections.

Official authorities in Iran describe the protests that took place in 2009 after the presidential elections as riot ‐ protests spurred when the two reform candidates claimed that election results were forged for the advantage of Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad.

Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Move to the euro haunts Ahmadinejad
2008-12-30
In 2007, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran's totally insane pure evil colourful president, called the US dollar a "torn piece of paper" and in November last year his government changed the country's base foreign currency to the euro in an effort to try and avoid US sanctions imposed as a result of the country's nuclear programme.
Colorful?!? You mean like Hitler, or Stalin, or Pol Pot?
At the time, Mr Ahmadi-Nejad and his colleague Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, even tried to persuade the other members of Opec to shift their reference prices for oil to the European currency, arguing that the greenback was fatally weakened.

A year on, however, and the Iranian government has had to live with a revival in the dollar's fortunes and it is the rial that is in the doldrums. The rial has lost about 10 per cent against the dollar during the past month, even rising above the important 10,000 to the dollar mark for the first time in its history. It has since strengthened slightly back to 9,820.

This has landed Mr Ahmadi-Nejad's government on the wrong side of public opinion, which views the rial's value against the dollar as a central indicator of its economic strength.

Although the rial has changed little if measured against a basket of currencies, including the euro and the pound, "people are only concerned about the dollar rate", says one economist.

In the aftermath of the Islamic revolution the rial collapsed, and the regime adopted a series of exchange rate policies in 1980s and 1990s by fixing at about half a dozen different rates against the dollar. But in 2001, a reformist government led by Mohammad Khatami officially adopted a policy of a managed float.

Yet successive Iranian governments, even before Mr Ahmadi-Nejad took office in August 2005, have followed an unstated policy of ensuring that the dollar traded at less than 10,000 rials.

Whenever the rate has looked close to crossing that mark, the central bank has injected dollars to bring it down again. But this time the authorities are choosing not to pump in dollars because the country's oil revenues, the main source of income, are plummeting.

Iran tries to receive its oil income in euros to avoid oversight by the US authorities, which could block the Islamic regime's money over the controversial nuclear programme and alleged funding of terrorism.

Experts estimate that about two-thirds of the country's $80bn foreign currency reserves are now held in euros, and government opponents have complained of a loss of about $5bn due to the European currency's recent decline against the dollar.

Mr Ahmadi-Nejad argues that the benefits of increasing euro share in the reserves still exceed recent losses.

"We have had both economic and political gains by shifting from the dollar to the euro because the dollar was hugely weakened but this [the current strength of the dollar] will last for a short period of time," Mr Ahmadi-Nejad said earlier this month, while vowing to run the country for a further three years even if oil prices fall to zero.

However, the drastic fall in oil prices will still put the government budget under great pressure next year, and may leave it no choice but to devalue the rial. Analysts say that they do not expect this to happen before the presidential election in June.

In downtown Tehran, the main centre of currency trading, traders say that the stronger dollar is a natural reaction to world markets.

They are, however, worried about the possibility of heavy-handed government interference — such as closure of their shops, which happened about 13 years ago — should the dollar strengthen further. "The government might accuse some traders of dollar smuggling, close their shops and urge people to buy hard currencies only from banks," one trader says.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Georgia Crisis Plays to Iran's Advantage - For Now
2008-09-02
Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad has been unusually cautious in reacting to Russia’s battle with the west over Georgia. Unlike his Syrian counterpart, who had lavished praise on Moscow and justified its military intervention, the Iranian president last week went only as far as to criticise obliquely those who were lambasting Russia.

“Countries that do not belong to a region do not interfere with the countries of that region,” he declared at the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation summit.

It is to Iran’s advantage to stay on the sidelines as a new geopolitical game unfolds, and Tehran tries to figure out its place in it. True, Tehran stands to benefit as Russia raises the price of its co-operation with other United Nations Security Council members on curbing the Iranian nuclear programme. But it is not unthinkable that Moscow would eventually try to buy its way out of the European crisis by offering more forceful help on Iran.

In the short term, trouble in another part of the world is surely good news for Mr Ahmadi-Nejad. It buys his scientists time to keep those centrifuges spinning and mastering nuclear technology. And it fits perfectly with the Iranian strategy of delaying the nuclear crisis at least until the next US president takes over.

The Iran nuclear dispute has disappeared from the headlines only a few weeks after it seemed to be coming to a head. This summer world powers, including Russia, renewed an offer of economic and political incentives to Tehran to persuade it to halt its uranium enrichment programme. Iran reacted by dragging its feet. People close to the regime whispered to all who were willing to listen that Iran was interested in the package’s sweetener. Under the European offer, Iran could, as a first step, freeze only the expansion of uranium enrichment activities and the UN would stop its pursuit of more sanctions.

When speculation was mounting that Israel could launch military strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities – thanks to apparent American opposition, the speculation has since subsided – the US agreed, for the first time, for a senior US official to take part in face-to-face talks with an Iranian negotiator.

Iran, however, celebrated the concession and offered nothing in return. Instead of an expected Yes or Maybe at the Geneva talks, diplomats received an Iranian counter offer of endless talks about talks. Iran’s attitude frustrated all participants, including the Russians, and raised the prospect of a more determined international front against Iran. Moscow, however, was still uneasy about imposing a fresh round of UN sanctions.

Now, with the US and western European governments condemning Russia for intervening in Georgia and recognising the breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, its resistance will harden. But it is too early to assume that, if the world faces a resurgent and more aggressive Russia, Iran will be off the hook. For one thing, the crisis could encourage the European Union to follow the US example and impose a further raft of unilateral sanctions against Tehran.

Moscow’s aim, moreover, appears to be to assert itself near its borders, not necessarily to provoke a wider global conflict. And while its relations with Iran have been friendly, Moscow fears an Iranian nuclear bomb as much as, if not more than, the US. Russia’s history of intervention in Persia, meanwhile, leaves Iranians wary of its intentions.

Vladimir Putin, Russia’s prime minister and former president, hinted last week that co-operation over Iran hinged on the west’s talking to Russia about its own concerns. But he also made clear that Russia had backed three UN sanctions resolutions on Iran because it was in its own “national interests”.

Iranians can rejoice for now at the erupting tensions in Europe. But it is doubtful that they will be counting on Russia to get them out of the nuclear dispute.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Two U.S. Aircraft Carriers Head for Gulf Region
2008-08-07
Two additional United States naval aircraft carriers are heading to the Gulf and the Red Sea, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Kuwait Times.

Kuwait began finalizing its “emergency war plan” on being told the vessels were bound for the region.

The U.S. Navy will neither confirm nor deny that carriers are currently en route. U.S. Fifth Fleet Combined Maritime Command located in Bahrain said it could not comment because of what a spokesman termed “force-protection policy.”

While the Kuwaiti daily did not name the ships it believes are heading for the Middle East, The Media Line’s defense analyst said they could be the USS Theodore Roosevelt and the USS Ronald Reagan.

Within the last month, the Roosevelt completed an exercise along the U.S. east coast focusing on communication among navies of different countries. It has since been declared ready for operational duties. The Reagan, currently with the Seventh Fleet, has just set sail from Japan.

The Seventh Fleet area of operation stretches from the East Coast of Africa to the International Date Line.

Meanwhile, the Arabic news agency Moheet reported at the end of July that an unnamed American destroyer, accompanied by two Israeli naval vessels traveled through the Suez Canal from the Mediterranean. A week earlier, a U.S. nuclear submarine accompanied by a destroyer and a supply ship moved into the Mediterranean, according to Moheet.

Currently there are two U.S. naval battle groups operating in the Gulf: one is an aircraft carrier group, led by the USS Abraham Lincoln, which carries some 65 fighter aircraft. The other group is headed by the USS Peleliu which maintains a variety of planes and strike helicopters.

The ship movements coincide with the latest downturn in relations between Washington and Tehran. The U.S. and Iran are at odds over Iran’s nuclear program, which the Bush administration claims is aimed at producing material for nuclear weapons; however, Tehran argues it is only for power generation.

Kuwait, like other Arab countries in the Gulf, fears it will be caught in the middle should the U.S. decide to launch an air strike against Iran if negotiations fail. The Kuwaitis are finalizing details of their security, humanitarian and vital services, the newspaper reported.

The six members of the GCC – Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Oman – lie just across the Gulf from Iran. Generals in the Iranian military have repeatedly warned that American interests in the region will be targeted if Iran is subjected to any military strike by the U.S. or its Western allies.

Bahrain hosts the U.S. Fifth Fleet, while there is a sizeable American base in Qatar. It is assumed the U.S. also has military personnel in the other Gulf states, TML’s defense analyst said.

Iran is thought to have intelligence operatives working in the GCC states, according to Dubai-based military analysts.

The standoff between the U.S. and Iran has left the Arab nations’ political leaders in something of a bind. The TML analyst said they were being used as pawns by Washington and Tehran.

Iran is offering them economic and industrial sweeteners, while the U.S. is boosting their defense capabilities. Presidents George W. Bush and Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad have paid visits to the GCC states in a bid to win their support.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Analysis: Mideast power vacuum 'benefits Iran'
2007-08-30
Iran’s president said on Tuesday that diminished US political influence in the Middle East was creating a “power vacuum” that would benefit Iran and other countries in the region.

Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad went on to say that that the US’s “weakening” of the Iraqi government – an apparent reference to recent criticism of prime minister Nouri al-Maliki by senior US politicians – would not help the US maintain control over the country. The comments are a reminder of Iran’s long-standing ambition to be the top power in the Persian Gulf, as it was before the 1979 Islamic revolution – a nightmare scenario for some of the other countries in the region.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran: Why August 22?
2006-08-18
The Iranians have been hinting that this August 22 will be very special. You gotta wonder why?

Well, the following should give us all pause for reflection.

Abd Allah Abu Bekr, Arabic merchant/1st kalief of Islam, dies
Abu Bakr's assumption of power is an extremely controversial matter, and the source of the first schism in Islam, between Sunni and Shia Islam. Shi'a believe that Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, Ali ibn Abu Talib, was his designated successor, while Sunnis believe that Muhammad deliberately declined to designate a successor. They argue that Muhammad endorsed the traditional Arabian method of shura or consultation, as the way for the community to choose leaders. Designating one's successor was the sign of kingship, or mulk, which the independence-minded tribesmen disliked. Whatever the truth of the matter, Ali gave his formal bay'ah, or submission, to Abu Bakr and to Abu Bakr's two successors. (The Sunni depict this bay'ah as enthusiastic, and Ali as a supporter of Abu Bakr and Umar; the Shi'a argue that Ali's support was only pro forma, and that he effectively withdrew from public life in protest). The Sunni/Shi'a schism did not erupt into open warfare until much later. Many volumes have been written on the affair of the succession.


Iran has said that on August 22 it will respond to an offer of incentives

One way to respond to the United Nations and the critics of the Iranian nuclear program would be to test a device. Or use one.

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad is said to be a believer that the end of the world is coming soon and that the Hidden Imam will reveal himself.
The Hidden Imam, however, will eventually leave his Greater Occultation and appear (zuhur ) to the world of humanity. This return is the most significant event in the future for the Shi'ite faithful and has thunderous eschatological consequences. This return will occur shortly before the Final Judgment and the end of history. Imam Mahdi will return at the head of the forces of righteousness and do battle with the forces of evil in one, final, apocalyptic battle.


It is believed that Ahmadi-Nejad is, in particular, a member of a sect of Shi'a that believes that they can hasten the return of the Hidden Imam.

Given the date, the Saudis are certainly a target. As the Sunni superpower, and Gulf rival, their destruction would be a great victory for the Shi'a, who have very little in the way of victories to celebrate. Their holidays generally commemorate losses and martyrdoms. The House of Saud has funded the spread of Sunni Islam worldwide and has funded those who have committed acts of violence against the Shi'a.

However, I cannot rule out an action against the United States or Israel. The United States has a great many facilities in the region within reach of Iran's military. An attack against the United States would certainly generate the turmoil that Ahmadi-Nejad needs to hasten the return.

Israel may a target, as well. The recent war in Lebanon can be seen by the Iranians as weakening the Israelis and making them vulnerable.

The Iranians are going to respond to the offers and demands concerning their nuclear program on August 22. They are not going to give up their program. They are not going to submit to international controls of any sort. Their response could be merely another delaying tactic.

Or, their response could be the detonation of a nuclear device.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
"No worries about Israel's Nuclear Capabilities or Nuclear Arms Ever Again"
2006-07-19
(via anti-Mullah blog, salt to taste)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad has declared he will make an announcement - earliest on Wednesday July 19th, 2006 or in the next few days which:

"WILL LET THE MOSLEM WORLD AROUND THE GLOBE KNOW THAT AFTER THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY WILL NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR ARMS OR NUCLEAR CAPABILITY EVER AGAIN"

This provides three possible scenarios:

1. Iran is about to nuke Israel.

2. Iran will declare they have nuclear capability with at least four missiles with NUCLEAR warheads (common knowledge in intelligence circles) that can easily reach all of Israel and threaten to use these against Israel if that country does not immediately cease attacks on the Hezbollah and Lebanon.

3. In the event that Israel does not immediately comply, Iran will declare war on Israel and fire nuclear missiles, which would not leave much of a country over which any more fighting is logical.

HOPED FOR RESULT: Depending on the extent of damage to Israel and the ability of that country to continue as a nation in a radioactively polluted environment, already weak-kneed Western powers will call for creating non-aggression pacts with nuclear Iran.

He has already told a group of Arabs meeting in Tehran around the time the Hezbollah/Hamas attacks began a similar general concept:

RIA Novosti reported that just before the attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah on Israel. Ahmadinejad addressed a high-profile Muslim forum held in Tehran saying "the main issue faced by the Islamic world is Israel's existence. The Islamic countries should mobilize their efforts to do away with this issue," and that "all the conditions for eliminating the Zionist regime" are "currently in place."
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Complex Reasons For Iran To Choose Mid-August
2006-06-29
To reach a conclusion about Iran's choice of this approximate date we also have to look at "neo-Iran" as it has evolved since Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad became President in August, 2005. He immediately set forth into implementing a palace coup against the old timers and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and now strives for Iran to be the leader of a global Moslem take over.

The Ahmadi-Nejad gang has tried already to jettison the word “Republic” and call the Iranian regime the Islamic government of Iran. The United Nations refused to accept the name change.

Earlier, Ayatollah "the Crocodile" Mesbah Yazdi (leader of the Hojatieh sect of Shia Islam) said that Ayatollah Khomeini did not really want to use the word “Republic” and the vote of the people is not what really counts in the Islamic government, after all, the word of the Faghih (loosely "Allah's representative on earth") or Velayat Faghih (the clerical law imposed by that person) is above the law and people’s vote...
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Khamenei appoints body to oversee Iran’s foreign policy
2006-06-28
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, has established a new body to supervise foreign policy in a move seen by some politicians in Tehran as a way to counterbalance the government of President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad.

The move comes as Iran faces fresh pressure from US and European Union officials to respond quickly to an incentive package presented earlier this month by western powers. The package, drawn up by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany, was crafted in an effort to persuade Tehran to limit its nuclear programme. Mr Ahmadi-Nejad said last week that Iran would respond to the package by August 22. However some US and EU officials want a much swifter response.

In a letter appointing Kamal Kharrazi – foreign minister under former President Mohammad Khatami – as head of the new Strategic Committee for Foreign Policy, Ayatollah Khamenei said it should “help facilitate macro-decision making… find new horizons… and make use of intellectuals”.

Mr Kharrazi said on Tuesday the body would have no executive function but would “devise strategies and present them to the leader”.

He spoke of “including experts from previous governments”. Mr Kharrazi was foreign minister throughout Iran’s two-year talks with the EU, a time when Iranian diplomats developed wide contacts in Europe.

Shargh, the reformist newspaper, on Tuesday splashed “Return of the moderates to foreign policy” as its front-page headline. Mohammad Ali Abtahi, the former vice-president, said the body’s composition meant “the continuation of détente”.

Among those appointed is Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Ayatollah Khamenei, who has acted as contact between the leader and Saudi Arabia in improving the two states’ relations over recent months. But Ayatollah Khamenei may also be acting to build consensus within Iran’s leadership, where different tactics have been aired in recent months over how to proceed with the nuclear programme.

Addressing top officials last week, Ayatollah Khamenei said the term “principleist” – usually claimed by fundamentalists including Mr Ahmadi-Nejad – should apply to anyone “of any trend ... committed to the principles of the revolution”.

Regime insiders recently told the FT the leadership was uncertain how to interpret the US decision to take part in talks if Iran accepted the west’s offer.

Ayatollah Khamenei said on Tuesday “the ground was prepared” for negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme but reiterated that Iran would not negotiate over its “right” to obtain and use nuclear technology.

His comments came as Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, said Moscow believed it was counterproductive to insist Tehran give an early response.



Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Stir over Iran president’s trip to ‘terror’ conference in China
2006-06-14
A central Asian summit to discuss security issues is likely to be overshadowed by the presence of Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, the controversial president of Iran, who arrives in Shanghai on Wednesday. He will be an observer at Thursday’s summit of the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation. The five-year-old grouping is one of China’s first attempts at playing a bigger diplomatic role in the region but it is prompting growing concern in the US.

Much attention will be focused on how China and Russia behave towards Iran and whether the countries discuss Iran’s nuclear fuel programme on the sidelines. China and Russia, both members of the United Nations Security Council, have been much less keen than the US or European governments to seek tougher action against Iran’s nuclear programme.

China has been trying to build closer relations with a number of Middle Eastern countries, including Iran, because of its ever-growing demand for oil. Iran provides about 13 per cent of China’s imports of oil and Beijing has signed a deal to buy liquefied natural gas from Iran and to allow a Chinese company to exploit the Yadavaran oilfield in Iran.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran ‘will need $5bn subsidy’ to avoid petrol rationing
2006-05-29
A leading Iranian parliamentarian on Sunday warned President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad he would need to spend an extra $5bn this year to pay for subsidies on sales to motorists of imported petrol and diesel to avoid politically sensitive rationing.

Kamal Daneshyar, head of the parliament’s energy commission, told Reuters the government needed to withdraw the money from the Oil Stabilisation Fund (OSF), which collects windfall oil revenue for contingencies and investment. He later told the FT this was in addition to the $2.5bn (€2bn, £1.3bn) already allocated in the budget for the year March 2006-March 2007.

But the allocation of OSF funds to maintain subsidies would fly in the face of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s promises to maximise spending on capital projects, especially in Iran’s regions.

Current government spending is already due to rise 20.5 per cent in the current year, according to Iran Economics, the leading Tehran monthly. With inflation put officially at 13.5 per cent, this represents a significant increase in real terms.

The fiscal pressure over petrol imports results from the antiquated state of Iran’s refineries and subsidies which keep the price for motorists at 9 cents a litre.

Despite having the world’s second-largest proven crude oil reserves, Iran imports around 40 per cent of its petrol. So while rising global oil prices boost Iranian coffers and are celebrated by Mr Ahmadi-Nejad, the subsequent rise in imported petrol prices has become a domestic issue.

Little progress has been made on a $15bn plan to revamp five existing refineries, build three new ones, and so increase production over five years from 40m litres a day to 92m litres.

Mr Daneshyar ruled out an earlier proposal, discussed in government and parliament, for two-tier pricing later in the year to sell imported petrol at cost to motorists. He said this would be “illegal” as the government lacked time to meet 25 targets set by the energy commission, including improving public transport.

With more and more cars throttling Tehran’s streets and the average motorist using 10 litres per day, double the world average, the World Bank in March estimated total losses from air pollution in Iran at $10.3bn by 2009, $14bn in 2014 and $19.2bn in 2019.

But many politicians oppose higher petrol prices as either inflationary or politically sensitive, even though around 8m litres of subsidised petrol are daily smuggled into Afghanistan, Iraq, Turkmenistan, Turkey and the UAE.

With Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s popularity holding up, his centrist opponents are discussing plans for a common front against him.

The Iranian media reported on Sunday that three leading figures – including two former presidents Mohammad Khatami and Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani plus Mehdi Karrubi, former parliamentary speaker – were discussing a common slate for both November’s election for the assembly of experts, which chooses Iran’s supreme leader, and for local elections next March.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US hawks 'hinder moves' on Iran nuclear incentives
2006-05-24
Opposition by US "hawks" led by Dick Cheney, the vice-president, is complicating efforts by the main European powers to put together a package of incentives aimed at persuading Iran to suspend its nuclear fuel cycle programme, according to diplomats and analysts in Washington.
As opposed to the European "pigeons"

London is today hosting political directors of the EU3 of France, Germany and the UK, together with China, Russia and the US to look at the twin tools of incentives and sanctions.

Condoleezza Rice, US secretary of state, was said by one diplomat to have "gone out on a limb" in an attempt to back the EU3's package of incentives but was facing resistance from Mr Cheney who is playing a more visible role in US foreign policy. Another diplomat said US internal divisions were holding up an agreement with the Europeans. The political directors held a preliminary meeting in London yesterday.

Some European diplomats believe that Washington will back the package - which includes guarantees for the construction of light water reactors in Iran, promises of nuclear fuel and a new regional security forum - if Moscow endorsed a tough chapter seven United Nations Security Council resolution that would require Iran to suspend uranium enrichment. "The idea is that something moves if everything moves," said one EU diplomat. "The positive elements of the package have to move at the same time as Security Council action."

US officials would not comment on Washington's internal debate. Ms Rice has denied reports that the EU3 asked the US to provide security guarantees to Iran. Accusing Iran of being the "central banker of terrorism", she made clear that such assurances were "not on the table". The current version of the package steers clear of formal security guarantees. It would, however, set up a new "regional security mechanism", including Iran and other Gulf countries, to reassure the Iranian government that its neighbours did not seek its overthrow.

Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, has already rejected the EU's advances, even before an offer has been made.

Diplomats are doubtful Iran will accept a deal that does not allow it to continue at least small-scale uranium enrichment. The US and EU3 have ruled that out. But the package envisages participating governments providing guarantees for an international consortium of companies to build light water reactors in Iran.

Mr Cheney is said to oppose the notion of "rewarding bad behaviour" following Iran's alleged breaches of its nuclear safeguards commitments. The "hawks" - who include John Bolton, the US envoy to the UN, and Bob Joseph, a senior arms control official - fear a repeat of a similar agreement reached with North Korea in 1994 which did not stop the communist regime from pursuing a secret weapons programme. Ministers are still bruised from angry exchanges between Ms Rice and Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov two weeks ago.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More