-Election 2012 | |
Romney Names Grenell As Foreign Policy Spokesman | |
2012-04-21 | |
Grenell brings foreign policy chops and more than a decade of political experience to the aggressive but relatively young Romney staff. His is one in a series of hires as the presumptive Republican nominee rapidly expands his small staff as it moves into the general election against President Obama. During all eight years of President George W. Bushs tenure, Grenell served as the administrations director of communications and public diplomacy at the United Nations. He advised four U.S. ambassadors to the United Nations: John D. Negroponte, John C. Danforth, John R. Bolton and Zalmay Khalilzad.
| |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Khalilzad's Ties to Zadari Are Questioned |
2008-08-26 |
WASHINGTON Zalmay Khalilzad, the American ambassador to the United Nations, is facing angry questions from other senior Bush administration officials over what they describe as unauthorized contacts with Asif Ali Zardari, a contender to succeed Pervez Musharraf as president of Pakistan. Mr. Khalilzad had spoken by telephone with Mr. Zardari, the leader of the Pakistan Peoples Party, several times a week for the past month until he was confronted about the unauthorized contacts, a senior United States official said. Other officials said Mr. Khalilzad had planned to meet with Mr. Zardari privately next Tuesday while on vacation in Dubai, in a session that was canceled only after Richard A. Boucher, the assistant secretary of state for South Asia, learned from Mr. Zardari himself that the ambassador was providing advice and help. Can I ask what sort of advice and help you are providing? Mr. Boucher wrote in an angry e-mail message to Mr. Khalilzad. What sort of channel is this? Governmental, private, personnel? Copies of the message were sent to others at the highest levels of the State Department; the message was provided to The New York Times by an administration official who had received a copy. Officially, the United States has remained neutral in the contest to succeed Mr. Musharraf, and there is concern within the State Department that the discussions between Mr. Khalilzad and Mr. Zardari, the widower of Benazir Bhutto, a former prime minister, could leave the impression that the United States is taking sides in Pakistans already chaotic internal politics. Mr. Khalilzad also had a close relationship with Ms. Bhutto, flying with her last summer on a private jet to a policy gathering in Aspen, Colo. Ms. Bhutto was assassinated in Pakistan in December. The conduct by Mr. Khalilzad, who is Afghan by birth, has also raised hackles because of speculation that he might seek to succeed Hamid Karzai as president of Afghanistan. Mr. Khalilzad, who was the Bush administrations first ambassador to Afghanistan, has also kept in close contact with Afghan officials, angering William Wood, the current American ambassador, said officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly on the matter of Mr. Khalilzads contacts. Mr. Khalilzad has said he has no plans to seek the Afghan presidency. Through his spokesman, he said he had been friends with Mr. Zardari for years. Ambassador Khalilzad had planned to meet socially with Zardari during his personal vacation, said Richard A. Grenell, the spokesman for the United States Mission to the United Nations. But because Zardari is now a presidential candidate, Ambassador Khalilzad postponed the meeting, after consulting with senior State Department officials and Zardari himself. A senior American official said that Mr. Khalilzad had been advised to stop speaking freely to Mr. Zardari, and that it was not clear whether he would face any disciplinary action. In 1979, Andrew Young was forced to resign as the American ambassador to the United Nations over his unauthorized contacts with the Palestine Liberation Organization. Administration officials described John D. Negroponte, the deputy secretary of state, and Mr. Boucher as angry over the conduct of Mr. Khalilzad because as United Nations ambassador he has no direct responsibility for American relations with Pakistan. Those dealings have been handled principally by Mr. Negroponte, Mr. Boucher and Anne W. Patterson, the American ambassador to Pakistan. Mr. Negroponte previously was the United Nations ambassador, and Ms. Patterson the acting ambassador. Why do I have to learn about this from Asif after its all set up? Mr. Boucher wrote in the Aug. 18 message, referring to the planned Dubai meeting with Mr. Zardari. We have maintained a public line that we are not involved in the politics or the details. We are merely keeping in touch with the parties. Can I say that honestly if youre providing advice and help? Please advise and help me so that I understand whats going on here. This is not the first time Mr. Khalilzad has gotten into trouble for unauthorized contacts. In January, White House officials expressed anger about an unauthorized appearance in which Mr. Khalilzad sat beside the Iranian foreign minister at a panel of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The United States does not have diplomatic relations with Iran, and a request from Mr. Khalilzad to be part of the United States delegation to Davos had been turned down by officials at the State Department and the White House, a senior administration official said. Richard C. Holbrooke, a former ambassador to the United Nations under President Clinton, said the administration was sending conflicting signals. It is not possible to conduct coherent foreign policy if senior officials are freelancing, he said. It has long been known that Mr. Zardari, who has been locked in a power struggle with Mr. Musharraf and Nawaz Sharif, a former prime minister whose party left the governing coalition on Monday, planned to run for president, administration officials and foreign policy experts said. I know that Zardaris interest in becoming president has been clear for quite some time, said Teresita C. Schaffer, a Pakistan expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. The Bush administration has long been uneasy with the idea of Mr. Sharif as a potential leader of Pakistan, and now that Mr. Musharraf is out of the picture, the administration, despite public protestation of neutrality, is seeking another ally. It distresses me that the U.S. government has not learned yet that having our guy is not a winning strategy in Pakistan, Ms. Schaffer said. Whoever our guy is isnt going to be the only guy in town, and if we go into it with that view, well bump up against a lot of other guys in Pakistan. A senior Pakistani official said that the relationship between Mr. Khalilzad and Mr. Zardari went back several years, and that the men developed a friendship while Mr. Zardari was spending time in New York with Ms. Bhutto. The Pakistani official said the consultations between the men were an open exchange of information, with each one giving insight into the political landscape in his capital. Mr. Khalilzad, being a political animal, understood the value of reaching out to Pakistans political leadership long before the bureaucrats at the State Department realized this would be useful at a future date, the official said. The ambassador did not make policy or change policy, he just became an alternate channel, the official said. Of Mr. Khalilzads Pakistan contacts, Sean I. McCormack, the State Department spokesman, said, Our very clear policy is that the Pakistanis have to work out any domestic political questions for themselves. Gordon D. Johndroe, a White House spokesman, said, The Pakistani elections are an internal matter for the Pakistani people. |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
A chill ushers in new diplomatic order in Pakistan |
2008-03-28 |
If it was not yet clear to Washington that a new political order prevailed here, the three-day visit this week by America's chief diplomat dealing with Pakistan should put any doubt to rest. The visit by Deputy Secretary of State John D. Negroponte turned out to be series of indignities and chilly, almost hostile, receptions as he bore the brunt of the full range of complaints that Pakistanis now feel freer to air with the end of military rule by Washington's favored ally, President Pervez Musharraf. Faced with a new democratic lineup that is demanding talks, not force, in the fight against terrorism, Negroponte publicly swallowed a bitter pill at his final news conference on Thursday, acknowledging that there would now be some real differences in strategy between the United States and Pakistan. He was upbraided at an American Embassy residence during a reception in his honor by lawyers furious that the Bush administration had refused to support the restoration of the dismissed judiciary by Musharraf last year. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
U.S. watches for cultivation sites of 'Pepsi jihad' |
2007-01-22 |
U.S. law-enforcement and intelligence officials say they are taking steps to monitor and combat the spread of Islamist extremism and support for a violent holy war against the West among a "Pepsi jihad" generation of young Muslims in the United States. At a hearing last week, officials from the CIA, FBI and Department of Homeland Security told lawmakers that the United States had less of a problem with "homegrown" Islamist terrorists than Europe did because of its history as a nation of immigrants. "I think the American historical experience ... with bringing in various groups and giving them, frankly, more opportunity than they might have enjoyed elsewhere has helped us immeasurably in this regard," CIA Director Michael V. Hayden told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Despite that, Phillip Mudd from the FBI's National Security Branch said, the ideology of extremist Islam -- and its attendant support for violence against the West in general and the United States in particular -- was spreading in the United States. "The commonality we have [with Europe] is people who are using the Internet or talking among friends who are part of what I would characterize as a Pepsi jihad. ... It's become popular among youth, and we have this phenomenon in the United States." Charlie Allen, the head of intelligence for the Department of Homeland Security, said the department reorganized its intelligence analysts late last year and "created a branch focused exclusively on radicalization in the homeland [that] is studying the dynamics of individual and organizational radicalization." He said the United States did not have "the alienation and the de facto segregation that we see in some places in Europe," but that nonetheless there were "pockets of extremism" in the country. He said the branch would create state-by-state and regional assessments this year "of the means and mechanism through which radicalization manifests throughout the United States." He added that another factor present in many of the successful "homegrown" Islamist attacks in Europe -- the Madrid and London transit bombings being the classic examples -- was a leader directing would-be terrorists to training facilities. "Frequently, we see a charismatic leader ... who selects people for further education, perhaps overseas, particularly into South Asia." The question of the role played by al Qaeda's central command in Pakistan in providing support and direction for so-called "homegrown" plots in Europe has vexed analysts since the Madrid rail bombings in March 2004. "While the incidents might be homegrown and the recruitment base, if you will, can often be second-generation immigrants who have a Muslim background, we've always found some kind of linkage back to" al Qaeda's leadership, said Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte. Mr. Allen noted that the Homeland Security Department had a unit dedicated to demographic analysis of immigrant communities in the United States, which might, wittingly or not, harbor networks of criminals or human smugglers that terrorists could exploit. The unit will fuse intelligence and law-enforcement reporting to "assess patterns in which migrant communities -- and likely associated extremists -- may or could travel to and establish themselves within the homeland." The unit aims to "provide strategic warning of mass migration to the United States and likely exploitation by illicit actors." |
Link |
Caribbean-Latin America |
Castro about to croak sez Negroponte |
2006-12-16 |
![]() Merry Christmas! Castro relinquished power for the first time in 47 years after surgery July 31 for an undisclosed intestinal disorder. He was last seen in an Oct. 28 video, shown on Cuban national television, in which he appeared gaunt and weak and warned that his convalescence would be lengthy. The Cuban leader did not show up as anticipated at a Dec. 2 national celebration in Havana scheduled to commemorate his 80th birthday and the 50th anniversary of the Cuban revolution. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
US Administration goes on Fall Offensive |
2006-10-13 |
Recent U.S. intelligence analyses of North Korea's nuclear and missile programs were flawed and the lack of clarity on the issue hampered U.S. diplomatic efforts to avert the underground blast detected Sunday, according to Bush administration officials. with barely restrained glee. Some recent secret reports stated that Pyongyang did not have nuclear arms and until recently was bluffing about plans for a test, according to officials who have read the classified assessments. The analyses in question included a National Intelligence Estimate a consensus report of all U.S. spy agencies produced several months ago and at least two other classified reports on North Korea produced by senior officials within the office of the Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte. The all seeing, all knowing NIE was wrong? Whodda guessed? We all know it to be fully authoritative for Iraq when it calls for immediate withdrawal according to Pelosi. The officials said there were as many as 10 failures related to intelligence reporting on North Korean missile tests and the suspected nuclear test that harmed administration efforts to deal with the issue. Details at the link. Intelligence officials are hoping President Bush will make a comment supporting U.S. intelligence agencies' performance on North Korea, something he has not done to date. In other news, people in Hell were asking for ice water. "It was an intelligence failure," said one administration official close to the issue. May I repeat myself? Additionally, the weak assessments undermined the recent visit to China by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who did not have good enough intelligence to persuade Mr. Hu that a test was imminent and that he should use his government's influence on North Korea to stop it. Aides to Mr. Abe are said by U.S. officials to be upset that they could not help Mr. Abe better understand the nuclear test plans before the meetings. Ooh screwing up relations with Japan. That's starting to get serious. Carl Kropf, a spokesman for Mr. Negroponte, dismissed as false claims by officials who say U.S. intelligence analysis on North Korea was flawed. "That is absolutely wrong, that we were not tracking this issue for some period of time," he said.] "We were tracking it. The Norks just didn't cooperate with the way we were spinning it. Our folks will coordinate better in the future." "I think the community is a little bit gun shy," Mr. Hoekstra said. "They're being held to a strict standard and as a result are going to caveat everything in the aftermath of Iraq." And we never publicize their successes. According to officials familiar with the reports, the weak analysis on North Korea is being blamed on Thomas Fingar, the most senior U.S. intelligence analyst within the office of the Director of National Intelligence. We've got a suspect. The Fickle Fingar of Fate. Mr. Fingar, now deputy Director of National Intelligence for analysis, was the lone dissenter in a 2002 national intelligence assessment that stated Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and carried over the skeptical viewpoint to North Korea's arms programs. That's why they call him The Stopped Clock. He was a Doubting Dove on Iraq and was right. Now he's a Doubting Dove on Korea and he's wrong. Wonder how he's calling Iran. Being a Doubting Dove on that one could get him renamed the Fickle Fingar of Infamy. Also wonder who he voted for in 2004. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | |||
Pentagon analyst gets light jail term | |||
2006-10-09 | |||
![]() Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee said that despite the "very serious charge" against Ronald Montaperto, he was swayed to reduce the sentence based on letters of support from current and former intelligence and military officials. Ahhh...nothing quite like the pungent aroma of a vapor-scandel. Montaperto, 67, who pleaded guilty in June to unlawful retention of classified documents he obtained while working at the Defense Intelligence Agency, said he was trying to get intelligence for the United States from the Chinese officials. "I never meant to hurt my country in any way," Mr. Montaperto said during his hearing at U.S. District Court in Alexandria. He worked at the Pentagon from 1981 until his dismissal in 2003.
Neil Hammerstrom, the assistant U.S. attorney, told the court that Montaperto met 60 times with two Chinese military intelligence officers and provided both secret and top secret information during the meetings. Mr. Hammerstrom asked for at least a two-year sentence, arguing a tough prison term was needed because Montaperto "repeatedly placed in jeopardy sensitive sources and methods pertaining to our national security." Montaperto told investigators he could not remember the specifics of the classified information he passed to Chinese intelligence, lapses that prevented prosecutors from charging him with more serious spy charges. WTF!?! U.S. officials said a major U.S. electronic eavesdropping operation against China went silent around the time Montaperto admitted passing the highly classified data to the Chinese in 1988. Rep. Peter Hoekstra, chairman of the House intelligence committee, said he is concerned by the apparent support for Montaperto from the U.S. intelligence community and promised a committee probe. "You would think that the intel community would set the standard for holding people accountable for mishandling and passing of classified information to our enemies," Mr. Hoekstra said.
Among the officials who wrote letters of support were Lonnie Henley, currently the deputy national intelligence officer for East Asia in the office of Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte. Mr. Henley said he has been "close friends" with Montaperto since the 1980s. Another supporter was retired Rear Adm. Eric McVadon, who currently holds a security clearance as a consultant on China to the CIA and Pentagon. Adm. McVadon said he would not second guess the case against his friend but could only "recoil at characterizations of him in the press as a spy." He may have passed highly classified documents to a foreign agent that resulted in sources and methods pertaining to national security being jeopardized but a spy? How dare you impugn his integrity?
Judge Lee said he also considered Montaperto's "extraordinary" voluntary confessions in the light sentence, which includes three months of home detention and five years' probation. However, investigators said Montaperto did not reveal or admit the passing of secrets until fooled into making the admissions in a 2003 sting operation while he worked at the U.S. Pacific Command think tank in Hawaii. U.S. intelligence officials have said Montaperto was first investigated in the late 1980s after a Chinese defector said Beijing considered him one of their "dear friends," or informal supporters of China. | |||
Link |
Fifth Column |
WaPo Provides Page 4 "Balance" to Sunday's Page 1 Article |
2006-09-25 |
Negroponte Highlights U.S. Successes Intelligence View That War Is Increasing Terror Is 'Fraction of Judgments,' He Says Monday, September 25, 2006; Page A04 The conclusion of U.S. intelligence analysts that the Iraq war has increased the threat from terrorism is only "a fraction of judgments" in a newly disclosed National Intelligence Estimate, Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte said yesterday. The NIE, completed in April, reflects the consensus view of 16 government intelligence services, including the CIA. The Washington Post, New York Times and Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that the classified document concludes according to 'unnamed (and presumably leftist)sources', anyway that the invasion and occupation of Iraq has fueled Islamic extremism and contributed to the spread of terrorist cells. "What we have said, time and again, is that while there is much that remains to be done in the war on terror, we have achieved some notable successes against the global jihadist threat," Negroponte said in a statement. "The conclusions of the intelligence community are designed to be comprehensive, and viewing them through the narrow prism of a fraction of judgments distorts the broad framework they create." Democrats yesterday seized on the intelligence community's assessment. The document, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (Mass.) said in a statement, "should be the final nail in the coffin for President Bush's phony argument about the Iraq war." Where do I find a picture of Teddy? Rep. Jane Harman (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said on CNN's "Late Edition": "Even capturing the remaining top al-Qaeda leadership isn't going to prevent copycat cells, and it isn't going to change a failed policy in Iraq." But leading Senate Republicans said that the intelligence finding shouldn't cause the United States to abandon military operations in Iraq. "We need to prevail in Iraq and . . . if we fail, then our problems will be much more complicated," Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) said on CBS's "Face the Nation." |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Harry Reid is apparently Senate Majority leader |
2006-06-11 |
Posted verbatim from the Post website. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said here Saturday that he will seek greater transparency from the Bush administration about possible threats posed by Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons. He said he wants to prevent possible misuse of intelligence as the administration deals with the crisis. Speaking before a partisan audience of Internet bloggers and Democratic activists, Reid said he plans to introduce legislation next week that would require a new national intelligence estimate for Iran, along with an unclassified summary that could form the basis for a public debate about possible action if Tehran continues to seek nuclear weapons. He also said he will require Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte to demonstrate that he has in place a process to review public statements by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and other officials with regard to Iran. Many Democrats allege that Bush and Cheney manipulated intelligence in making the public case for war with Iraq. "We face many threats -- threats that have grown worse -- because this administration took its eye off the ball," he said in remarks prepared for delivery. "We must address these threats, but we must not be manipulated into acting for ideological or political gain." He urged the Senate intelligence committee to complete its investigation into the use of prewar intelligence, a probe that led to a brief but bitter shutdown of the Senate by Reid and other Democrats last November. "What we need to know -- and still don't know today -- is whether the White House intentionally cherry-picked and politicized intelligence to sell the war," he said. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Hayden defends wiretapping at hearing |
2006-05-19 |
Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden vigorously defended the legality of the Bush administration's domestic wiretapping program and declared that the CIA "must be transformed" to stay abreast of terrorist and other threats during an often contentious hearing on his nomination to be the next CIA director. Hayden spent much of the day fending off questions about his previous job as director of the National Security Agency. The four-star general acknowledged playing a larger than previously understood role in the creation of the controversial domestic eavesdropping program, and repeatedly refused to respond to questions about details of the operation during the public portion of his testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. But Hayden also described ambitious plans for the beleaguered agency he hopes to lead next, saying he intends to push the CIA to be more aggressive in mounting clandestine operations and more rigorous in the assessments it produces to avoid the mistakes that plagued the prewar estimates on Iraq. In perhaps the clearest signal of a looming shift in course for the troubled agency, Hayden made it clear that he believes the CIA has become too bogged down tracking daily developments in Iraq and other global trouble spots. Instead, he suggested that the CIA should surrender more of that work to the Pentagon, focus more of its energies on anticipating longer-term threats and trends, and reconcile itself to a diminished role in which it is an important, but not isolated, member of the U.S. intelligence community. At one point, Hayden likened the CIA to "a top player on a football team -- critical, but part of an integrated whole. Even the top player needs to focus on the scoreboard, not on their individual achievement." Hayden, 61, currently serves as the deputy director for national intelligence, the principal deputy to the nation's top spymaster, John D. Negroponte, who oversees the activities of all 16 U.S. spy agencies. The general played a behind-the-scenes role in ousting former CIA director Porter J. Goss, who resigned two weeks ago amid criticism that he was too turf-conscious and resistant to reforms. Lawmakers and Senate aides emerged from Thursday's session saying that Hayden was likely to be confirmed by the Senate as early as next week. Even so, the hearing made it clear that Hayden's standing among some members has been diminished by his involvement in domestic surveillance programs that have been major sources of controversy for the Bush administration in recent months. Shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush authorized the NSA to intercept communications between people in the United States and individuals overseas suspected of having ties to al-Qaida. In doing so, the NSA bypassed the usual requirement that the government obtain permission from a court before placing wiretaps on a U.S. resident. The Bush administration also kept the program hidden from all but a handful of lawmakers until it was exposed in news reports last year. During one particularly tense exchange Thursday, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., challenged Hayden to reconcile details that have emerged on the scope of the surveillance operation with previous public comments downplaying its significance or suggesting that the government was not eavesdropping on Americans without court warrants. "General, I can't tell now if you've simply said one thing and done another, or whether you have just parsed your words like a lawyer to intentionally mislead the public," Wyden said. "What's to say that if you're confirmed to head the CIA, we won't go through exactly this kind of drill with you over there?" Hayden shot back: "Well, Senator, you're going to have to make a judgment on my character." Hayden acknowledged that the program raised privacy concerns, but said repeatedly that he believed it was lawful. "I'm very comfortable with what the agency did, what I did," he said. He resisted pressure to provide more details, saying he would address matters in a closed session with senators scheduled later in the day. He similarly deflected questions about the CIA's interrogation methods and handling of detainees. But Hayden did provide some new information on the origins of the domestic surveillance program, indicating that he proposed the idea after being prompted by then-CIA director George J. Tenet to consider what else the NSA might do to combat terrorism. Tenet "invited me to come down and talk to the administration about what more could be done," Hayden said. "There then followed a discussion as to why or how we could make that possible." He did not elaborate, but disputed reports that Vice President Cheney or other administration officials put pressure on the NSA to be even more aggressive in spying on Americans. Some lawmakers have questioned whether Hayden's lengthy military career is a liability at a time when the Pentagon is increasingly encroaching on the CIA's traditional turf. Hayden expressed support for the expanding military role in intelligence-gathering, saying that the burden on the CIA has been so taxing that "we welcome additional players on the field." But he also sought to distance himself from the Pentagon, noting that he and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld had disagreed over reforms that eroded the military's influence over intelligence operations and budgets. Hayden was also sharply critical of the activities of a controversial intelligence analytic unit set up within the Pentagon by former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, a leading advocate for the war in Iraq. The team Feith assembled helped make the case for war by uncovering supposed links between Saddam Hussein's regime and al-Qaida. Their findings were presented to the CIA and officials at the White House, but have since been discredited. Feith's team, Hayden said, had set out to prove a case by assembling "every possible ounce of evidence" and ignoring contradictory information. Using that method, he continued, analysts can build a convincing case against even innocent targets. "I got three great kids, but if you tell me, 'Go out and find all the bad things they've done, Hayden,' I could build you a pretty good dossier," Hayden said. "You'd think they were pretty bad people because that's what I was looking for and that's what I built up. That'd be very wrong, OK? That would be inaccurate. That would be misleading." Hayden said he was concerned that numerous investigations and public criticism have taken a toll on the agency. "It is time to move past what seems to me to be an endless picking apart of the 'archaeology' of every past intelligence failure and success," Hayden said. "CIA needs to get out of the news -- as source or subject -- and focus on protecting the American people by acquiring secrets and providing high-quality all-source analysis." |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Reading more tea leaves on Hayden's nomination |
2006-05-09 |
Gen. Michael V. Hayden isn't the first active-duty military officer tapped to lead the CIA -- he is in fact the fifth -- but many intelligence experts and officers have bemoaned the idea of a general leading the agency at a time when the Pentagon is expanding its ability to engage in global spying and man-hunting, traditional realms of the CIA. Despite such qualms, intelligence specialists say Hayden's appointment may turn out to be a clever move by intelligence czar John D. Negroponte to help him assert authority over Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his burgeoning intelligence bureaucracy. Negroponte, who by law oversees all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, has expressed frustration that he has not made more progress in managing the agencies under the Defense Department's jurisdiction. Negroponte was mindful of the issue yesterday as Hayden was officially nominated. "To those who raise a question about the fact that Mike Hayden wears the uniform," Negroponte said in announcing his nomination, "I think they can also be assured that Mike Hayden is a very, very independent-minded person, blunt-spoken. . . . I don't think [he] will have any difficulty whatsoever staking out positions that are independent." The intelligence overhaul that installed Negroponte as the first director of national intelligence also assigned the CIA the role of managing all "human intelligence" -- or spying -- including the collection done by the Defense Department, which many experts believe is trying to break out on its own in this arena. "The concern about Hayden is not really about Hayden, it's about Rumsfeld and Cheney," said one former senior intelligence officer, referring to Vice President Cheney's strained relationship with the CIA and allegations that he used Pentagon-gathered information on Iraq's weapons because it comported with his personal view on Iraq. "Hayden seems to be one of those guys who will, without hesitation, stand up to anyone with whom he disagrees," said Mackubin T. Owens, professor of national security studies at the Naval War College. "He's out of Rumsfeld's reach." The CIA establishment views the encroachment of the Pentagon into such sensitive areas as covert operations and human intelligence as a misguided effort that does not recognize the inherent difficulties in understanding, much less penetrating, terrorist networks. "If the military's calling the shots, you're not going to get the focus on Manchester, England [where the London bombers came from], or the Montreal axis," a reference to the crossroads for a group of al-Qaeda figures, the former intelligence official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the upcoming debate on Hayden's nomination. But the military's frustration with the CIA -- including not having enough terrorist targets identified for attack in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere -- is at least in part behind Rumsfeld's expansion of military intelligence capabilities. Rumsfeld has moved hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of troops into clandestine intelligence collection and analysis. With little public discussion and a wall of secrecy, the military is poised to launch its own intelligence-gathering and man-hunting operations independent of the CIA or other authorities. "When you're not getting what you want, the bureaucratic response is to create your own [bureaucracy], not because you want different answers, but because you want answers," said Owens. Managed by Army Lt. Gen. Lee Blalack , a legendary special operations officer who now holds the title of deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence and warfighting support, the Pentagon is demanding that the CIA share its most sensitive databases, that small teams of undercover soldiers be allowed to secretly collect information in friendly countries, and that clandestine teams of military man-hunters be allowed to sneak into countries with which the United States is not at war to kill or capture terrorism suspects. But Hayden, an Air Force four-star general, has already taken steps and positions aimed at enhancing the CIA's leadership in human intelligence. Although he comes from the world of high-tech signals intelligence, Hayden was an early proponent of scaling back the CIA's responsibilities so it could concentrate on human intelligence. As Negroponte's deputy, he helped reshape the CIA's directorate of operations into the National Clandestine Service, an effort that many CIA officers applauded. Hayden's expected appointment of Stephen R. Kappes for a leadership role was seen as another indication that Negroponte and Hayden believe that experienced spies are the key to strengthening the CIA's ability to track down terrorists and go after other difficult targets. Kappes headed the CIA's operations branch until he resigned in a dispute with then-Director Porter J. Goss's chief of staff. Former and current intelligence officers say Goss never had a strategic plan for improving spying on terrorist networks. Kappes, on the other hand, had slowly begun to put his ideas, gained through 23 years of experience around the world, into action. Part of that plan called for deepening ties with foreign intelligence services. As director of the National Security Agency, Hayden sought to enhance relations with foreign intelligence services. The CIA, with the help of its foreign partners, has been responsible for capturing or killing nearly all the key al-Qaeda figures since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
General Hayden eyed to succeed Goss as CIA director |
2006-05-06 |
Gen. Michael V. Hayden, who senior administration officials said Friday was the likely choice of President Bush to head the Central Intelligence Agency, has a stellar résumé for a spy and has long been admired at the White House and on Capitol Hill. But General Hayden, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, would also face serious questions about the controversy over the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program, which he oversaw and has vigorously defended. His Senate nomination hearing, if he is chosen to succeed Director Porter J. Goss, is likely to reignite debate over what civil libertarians say is the program's violation of Americans' privacy. Mr. Bush has often reserved decisions about top-level appointments until just before they are announced, but senior administration officials said Friday that General Hayden was the clear leading candidate. Confirmation hearings would give the administration's opponents a highly visible forum for questioning not only the eavesdropping program but President Bush's overall handling of national security. And while he might bring to the beleaguered C.I.A. the power of his ties to the White House and to his current boss, John D. Negroponte, director of national intelligence, General Hayden could find his background as an Air Force officer and specialist in technical intelligence systems does not suit some at the C.I.A., which specializes in traditional espionage. The C.I.A. has long resented the expenditure of billions of dollars on technical systems, like spy satellites, while complaining that the budget for human spies has been too low. Even though General Hayden has not been closely associated with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, his pedigree as a military officer could reinforce concerns at the spy agency that the Pentagon is intruding into its traditional bailiwick. While General Hayden has extensive administrative experience, he would face daunting challenges at the C.I.A., an agency that has been demoralized and has endured turbulence since the mid-1990's. As N.S.A. director until last year, General Hayden oversaw the program to intercept international phone calls and e-mail messages of Americans and others in the United States believed to have links to Al Qaeda. General Hayden, 61, has been the program's most public defender, repeatedly asserting that it is legal and constitutional even though the eavesdropping is done without warrants from a special court set up in 1978 to authorize such surveillance. "I've taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," General Hayden said at the National Press Club in January as he defended what the Bush administration calls the Terrorist Surveillance Program. "I would never violate that Constitution, nor would I abuse the rights of the American people." Some critics of the program say that General Hayden's public assurances that N.S.A. has always followed the laws governing domestic eavesdropping are difficult to square with his role in the secret program. Marc D. Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, said the nomination would be strongly opposed by civil libertarians. "We have to confront the chilling prospect that the incoming head of the C.I.A. believes it's permissible to conduct warrantless surveillance on the American public," Mr. Rotenberg said Friday night. Last year the C.I.A. lost its half-century-old standing at the center of the sprawling intelligence bureaucracy, as Mr. Negroponte succeeded Mr. Goss as the president's chief adviser on intelligence. Melissa Boyle Mahle, a C.I.A. officer from 1988 to 2002 who wrote a 2004 book on the agency, "Denial and Deception," said, "The benefit of someone coming from the D.N.I.'s office is obvious he'd have the immediate ear of Negroponte." Though he has spent seven years at the N.S.A. and the director's office and away from the Pentagon, General Hayden is a career military intelligence officer. Several senior military officers have been C.I.A. director, and the current deputy director is Vice Adm. Albert M. Calland III of the Navy. A bigger issue for some intelligence professionals might be General Hayden's lack of experience in traditional human intelligence. Some officials want to intensify the C.I.A. concentration on the clandestine service, and Mr. Goss's resistance to such a narrowing of the agency's mission is said to have been one reason for his ouster. General Hayden, who grew up in a working-class family in Pittsburgh, drew mixed reviews at the N.S.A. He overhauled its management but began a multibillion-dollar modernization program, known as Trailblazer, which ran huge cost overruns and is widely considered to be a failure. |
Link |