Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

-Land of the Free
The Legacy of Mark Bingham Lingers 19 Years after His Heroic Death on 9/11
2020-09-11
[MetroSource] Entrepreneur, rugby player, gay man: Mark Bingham was known to friends, family and co-workers as a lot of things in his short life. Today, he’s remembered across the globe as a gay hero of 9/11.

Bingham was one of those who decided to put their lives on the line to prevent hijacked United Flight 93 from colliding with its intended target, which many believe was either the Capitol Building or the White House in Washington, D.C.

The 31-year-old Bingham and fellow passengers Todd Beamer, Tom Burnett and Jeremy Glick assessed the situation and decided to storm the cockpit of the plane, where they hoped to retake control of the flight or at least prevent it from being used as a missile.

The world now knows that because they took action, the plane roared from the sky into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where ceremonies were held today to commemorate their loss and once again pay tribute to their courage.

Mark Bingham is remembered with particular fondness by the gay community, not only because of his selfless act of bravery in the face of odds that were at best dire. He exemplifies the gay man so many aspire to be: compassionate, wise, clever, and imposing enough to make a difference in a physical altercation.

Having broken bones as a high school soccer player, he was no stranger to pain. Later, he’d push through an endless string of injuries to help take the University of California Berkeley to two national championships.

Those who knew him well readily tell the curious that Mark was an intense fellow who actually relished strategies for plowing through a field of adversaries — although during a match, he was just as likely to pick someone up, pat him on the back and tell him he’s doing a great job.

By the end of the ’90s, Bingham was partnered and had opened his own high-tech PR agency, the Bingham Group. It was not a life someone would have been happy to walk away from. He could have done nothing and hoped for the best.

What he did do was call his Mom once United Airlines 93 was hijacked. "Hi Mom, this is Mark Bingham," he said with atypical formality. "I just wanted to say I love you. I am on a flight from Newark to San Francisco, and there are three guys on board who’ve taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb."

What we don’t know is what Mark, Todd, Tom and Jeremy did that saved hundreds of lives, only that the hijackers died without success, taking the passengers and crew of Flight 93 along with them.

A year after his death, a biennial international rugby union competition predominantly for gay and bisexual men, was established in his memory. The Mark Kendall Bingham Memorial Tournament has since become known worldwide simply as The Bingham Cup.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Document casts doubt on Moussaoui's claim of a 9/11 role
2006-04-22
Federal officials revealed yesterday that they have no evidence that ''shoe bomber" Richard Reid was told to fly a jet into the White House on Sept. 11, 2001, under the command of Zacarias Moussaoui, as Moussaoui testified in his death penalty trial.

The acknowledgment came in a document read into the record yesterday morning by Moussaoui's defense lawyers. Prosecutors worked with the defense in preparing the document, which is called a stipulation and is presented to the jury as fact.

The document said, ''There is no information to indicate that Richard Reid had preknowledge of the 9/11 attacks or was instructed by Al Qaeda leadership to conduct an operation in coordination with Moussaoui." The document pointed out that Reid had left his possessions to Moussaoui in his will before Reid mounted a an attack in December 2001 in which he tried to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight with a bomb in his shoe.

''In the opinion of the FBI," the document said, ''if Reid was to be part of the same martyrdom operation as Moussaoui, it is unlikely he would have bequeathed his possessions to Moussaoui."

The document, read to the jury by defense lawyer Alan Yamamoto, concluded that according to two FBI analysts ''it is highly unlikely" that Reid was to have been part of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

The development casts doubt on Moussaoui's account last month when he said he had been planning to fly a fifth hijacked plane into the White House on Sept. 11 and Reid was to have been part of his crew. Moussaoui's lawyers have told the jury that he was exaggerating his role; prosecutors have said he was telling the truth.

Moussaoui pleaded guilty last year to conspiring with Al Qaeda in the Sept. 11 plot and the jury in the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va., is now deciding if he should be executed.

Moussaoui's lawyers had tried to call Reid to the stand to discredit Moussaoui's story, but US District Judge Leonie Brinkema last week vacated her earlier order that required the government to produce Reid for Moussaoui's trial. At the time, prosecution and defense attorneys reportedly were trying to work out an agreement to tell the jury what Reid would have said if he testified, partly because of the expense and security concerns if they moved him to Alexandria.

Reid is serving a life prison term for the attempted bombing.

When Moussaoui testified again last week, prosecutors apparently attempted to blunt the impact of the document that was revealed yesterday. Moussaoui testified that he and Reid were good friends and prosecutors asked him if they ever discussed the Sept. 11 attacks.

''Never," Moussaoui said, adding that a senior Al Qaeda official had told Moussaoui that ''Reid was part of the team. I was in charge, he was my second. He did not have a single clue about the operation. . . . They told me not to say anything to him."

The document was revealed after the jury heard again yesterday from family members of people killed in the Sept. 11 attacks who are testifying for the defense in its efforts to spare Moussaoui's life.

The witnesses, barred from speaking for or against execution, instead provided remembrances of their loved ones in what amounted to a series of moving memorials about how they lived rather than how they died.

Jennifer Glick, a sister of Jeremy Glick, who was aboard the commandeered flight that went down in Pennsylvania, told the jurors that her brother was a leader of his family, which has preserved his memory by setting up a program called Jeremy's Heroes, to aid young people in physical education.
Link


Home Front: WoT
Peggy Noonan on Flight 93
2006-02-02
Wall Street Journal, excerpted from a longer column

On the subject of political passion Tom Shales, longtime TV critic of the Washington Post and possessor of occasional eloquence, wrote a piece this week that deserves comment. I don't mean his State of the Union review, which began, "George Bush may or may not be the worst president since Herbert Hoover . . ." I mean his attack last Monday on "Flight 93," the A&E television movie on that fated 9/11 flight. Mr. Shales said it was shameful that vulgar dramatizers would "exploit" the pain of those on the flight and those they left behind. Or as he put it, he had, innocent that he is, thought it "unthinkable" that "even the sleaziest producers" would "exploit any aspect of a nightmare that the nation had witnessed in horror."
By exploit I think he means "remember." There is nothing vulgar, low or unhelpful about remembering the particular heroism of Todd Beamer, Jeremy Glick and dozens of others. Their action--they stormed the cockpit that day, forced the plane down and kept it from hitting a Washington target, presumably the Capitol or the White House--was a moment of courage and sacrifice, and we all owe them a great deal. Imagine if the particular wound the hijackers meant to inflict had been successful that day. Imagine how much worse it would have been,

Remembering the men and women of Flight 93 isn't a self-indulgence but a duty. One senses in the Shales review the sneaky little suggestion that those who would remember, and who would tell this story (based by the way on the surviving telephone and other harrowing tapes of that flight) are in fact being political. But one suspects it is Mr. Shales who is being political. Maybe he fears those stupid Americans will get all emotional if they revisit part of the horror of that day, and go out and do something bad. Let's not speak of it lest the rabble be roused.

What a snob.

You wonder at the intemperance of angry young lefties and then think of the example set for them by exhausted old lefties.

I watched the A&E movie Monday, and it was good . . . consistent with the historical record, respectful of the people on the plane, and more than a little uncomfortably remindful of what 9/11 was and what we're fighting for. (Also perhaps a little too Oprah in spots, but that's A&E for you.) There's also this one in production for theatrical release in April, which looks like it's also being done right. (The trailer'll give you goosebumps.)

I can see why someone like Shales would dislike it . . . it interferes with maintaining the September 10 mindset which is the foundation of the whole liberal elite edifice.
Link


Home Front: Culture Wars
Steyn: FLIGHT 93, RE-HIJACKED
2005-09-14
sans my comments - I couldn't add anything better
At 9.58am Eastern time, Tuesday September 11th 2001, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in Pennsylvania.

Why?

As UPI’s Jim Bennett wrote, “The Era of Osama lasted about an hour and a half or so, from the time the first plane hit the tower to the moment the General Militia of Flight 93 reported for duty.”

Exactly right. Six decades earlier, the American people had to wait four months between Pearl Harbor and the Doolittle Raid. But September 11th was Pearl Harbor and the Doolittle Raid wrapped up in 90 minutes. Flight 93 was supposed to be the fourth of Osama’s flying bombs, its destination either the White House or the Capitol. Had it reached its target, the following morning’s headlines would have included “The Vice-President is still among the missing, presumed dead”. Had Flight 93 sheared the top off the White House, that would have been the day’s “money shot”, as it was in the alien-invasion flick Independence Day - the shattered façade, smoke billowing, the seat of American power reduced to rubble.

But the dopey hijackers assigned to Flight 93 were halfway across the continent before they made their move and started meandering back east. And, by the time the passengers began calling home on their cellphones, their families knew what had happened in New York. Todd Beamer couldn’t get through to his wife, so the last conversation of his life was with the GTE telephone operator, who stayed on the line with him and overheard his final words: “Are you ready, guys? Let’s roll!” And then a brave group of passengers jumped their hijackers and, at the cost of their own lives, prevented that day’s grim toll rising even higher. At a terrible moment for America, their heroism was the only victory of the day.

Four years on, plans for the Flight 93 National Memorial have now been revealed. The winning design, chosen from 1,011 entries, will be built in that pasture in Pennsylvania where those heroes died. The memorial is called “The Crescent of Embrace”.

That sounds like a fabulous winning entry - in a competition to create a note-perfect parody of effete multicultural responses to terrorism. Indeed, if anything, it’s too perfect a parody: the “embrace” is just the usual huggy-weepy reconciliatory boilerplate, but the “crescent” transforms its generic cultural abasement into something truly spectacular. In the design plans, “The Crescent of Embrace” looks more like the embrace of the Crescent – ie, Islam. After all, what better way to demonstrate your willingness to “embrace” your enemies than by erecting a giant Islamic crescent at the site of the day’s most unambiguous episode of American heroism?

Okay, let’s get all the “of courses” out of the way – of course, the overwhelmingly majority of Muslims aren’t terrorists; of course, we all know “Islam” means “peace” and “jihad” means “healthy-lifestyle lo-carb granola bar”; etc, etc. Nevertheless, the men who hijacked Flight 93 did it in the name of Islam and their last words as they hit the Pennsylvania sod were no doubt “Allahu Akhbar”. One would be unlikely even today to come across an Allied D-Day memorial so misconceived in its spirit of reconciliation as to be called the Swastika of Embrace. Yet Paul Murdoch, the architect, has somehow managed to produce a design whose two most obvious interpretations are a) a big nothing or b) a splendid memorial to the hijackers rather than their victims.

Four years ago, most of us understood instinctively the courage of Flight 93. They were honoured not just by chickenhawks and neocons and Zionists and the usual suspects but even by celebrities. The leathery old rocker Neil Young wrote a dark driving anthem called “Let’s Roll” that began with cellphones ringing. Then:

I know I said I love you
I know you know it’s true
I got to put the phone down
And do what we gotta do

One’s standing in the aisle way
Two more at the door
We got to get inside there
Before they kill some more


Granted, even then, there were a lot of folks eager to “embrace” their enemies. The day after September 11th, Robert Daubenspeck of White River Junction, Vermont wrote to my local newspaper advising against retaliation: “Someone, someday, must have the courage not to hit back but to look them in the eye and say, ‘I love you’.” That’s not as easy as it sounds. If you try to look Richard Reid the shoebomber in the eye as he’s bending down to light the fuse sticking out of his sock, you could easily put your back out.

But each to his own. If Mr Murdoch sincerely believes in a “crescent of embrace”, let him build one – at the headquarters of a “moderate” Islamic lobby group, or in the parking lot of your wackier colleges. To impose it on Flight 93 – to, in effect, hijack those passengers a second time – is an abomination. Flight 93 is about what happens when you understand that some things can’t be embraced. Perhaps Mr Beamer and his comrades did indeed “look them in the eye” and saw there was nothing to negotiate, nothing to “embrace”. So they acted – and, faced with a novel and unprecedented form of terror, they stopped it cold in little more than an hour. Todd Beamer asked that telephone operator to join him in reciting the 23rd Psalm: “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death
” He knew there would be no happy ending that day, but in their resourcefulness and sacrifice he and his fellow passengers gave their country the next best thing: a hopeful ending. That’s what the Flight 93 Memorial should be honouring.

Instead, in its feeble cultural cringe, the Crescent of Embrace hands the terrorists of Flight 93 the victory they were denied on September 11th. And it profoundly dishonours Todd Beamer, Thomas Burnett, Jeremy Glick, Mark Bingham and other forgotten heroes of that flight.

Most of us are all but resigned to losing New York’s Ground Zero memorial to a pile of non-judgmental if not explicitly anti-American pap: The minute you involve big-city politicians and foundations and funding bodies and “artists” you’re on an express chute to the default mode of the cultural elite. But surely it’s not too much to hope that in Pennsylvania the very precise, specific, individual, human scale of one great act of American heroism need not be buried under another soggy dollop of generic prettified passivity. A culture that goes to such perverse lengths to disdain its heroes cannot survive and doesn’t deserve to.

Four years ago, Todd Beamer’s rallying cry was quoted by Presidents and rock stars alike. That’s all that’s needed in that field: the kind of simple dignified memorial you see on small-town commons saluting Civil war veterans, a granite block with the names of the passengers and the words “LET’S ROLL.” The “crescent of embrace”, in its desperation to see no enemies and stand for nothing, represents the precise opposite of Beamer, Glick, Burnett and co: Are you ready, guys? Let’s roll over.
Originally at The Irish Times, September 12th 2005
Link


9-11-01
2002-09-11
318 years before, on September 11, 1683, the conquering armies of Islam were repulsed from the gates of Vienna. In our day, no one thinks about such things when they get up in the morning. It was important to the Europeans then, and for a hundred years or so afterward it was a date they remembered.

September 11, 2001 started out as a pretty day. There was sunshine with just enough hint of impending autumn in the air to make it almost perfect. I was running a little late, but my wife, Gloria, and I were having a cup of coffee before I left for work. Lots of days, that’s the only time we see each other before we go to bed at night. If I could get out the door at 9:00, and the traffic was good, I would be at work at 9:30. We were watching Steve, E.D., and Brian on Fox and Friends. We’re both news junkies, so Fox is usually what’s on the box. Somewhere between one cup of coffee and another the image on the TV screen switched to the 110-story World Trade Center in New York. A plane, American Airlines flight 11, out of Boston’s Logan Airport with 92 people on board, had just crashed into it. Fox and Friends was aghast. So were we. We saw a gaping hole in the side of the building, a lot of smoke and flame and falling debris.

Casualties? Who had any idea? Certainly a planeload of people was dead. Certainly most, if not all, of the people — on how many floors? — were dead or seriously injured. Someone reported 70,000 people worked in the twin towers. The toll must be horrific. How were rescuers going to get up there? It was an incredible, sickening tragedy. “How the hell does a pilot make a mistake like that?” I asked. It had to be an intentional act — but who would be crazy enough to do that?

We didn’t know then that the air-traffic controller handling the plane in Nashua, N.H., had heard a conversation in the cockpit and realized a hijacking was under way. John Ogonowski, 50, the captain, had thumbed the mike button to alert controllers.

A few minutes later — 15 minutes, to be precise — the second tower was hit, the same way, by United Flight 175, also out of Boston. We actually saw the second plane fly into the building, live. We saw a second planeload, 65 living, breathing human beings, die. There was no uncertainty about what had happened this time. By some stretch of the imagination the first could possibly have been an accident, however unlikely. There was no way the second could be. New York was under attack.

“It’s Pearl Harbor,” I told Gloria. “We’re at war now.”

The thought of going to work went onto the back burner for awhile as we watched, stunned and fascinated, along with everyone else in the country who had access to a television.

Somehow I got out the door. I listened to the car radio, WTOP, the Washington all-news channel, all the way down the Baltimore-Washington Parkway. The attack on the Pentagon — American Flight 77, out of Washington’s Dulles Airport, with 64 people aboard — an hour after the first tower was hit, didn’t come as a surprise after the World Trade Center. All we would do was curse the people who had done it. And wait for the next attacks, wherever they were going to happen. The crash destroyed four of the five rings that encircle the world's largest office building. A Pentagon spokesman called the casualties "extensive," although they were clearly not as extensive as New York's. These casualties were also more personal to me, as a retired military man.


Reports kept coming, but they were were confused and confusing. There was a story that a car bomb had gone off outside the State Department. There was a report of smoke coming from a location near the White House. There was a rumor that a plane had crashed in western Pennsylvania, another had supposedly crashed in Kentucky, and a rumor of another headed toward the White House from Dulles Airport. We didn’t know which were true; we assumed they all were until they were disproved or retracted.

People were already leaving work to bring their kids home from school. Would whoever did this attack schools, too? I didn’t think so, but I could understand the feelings, the uncertainty. I wasn’t altogether sure that someone wasn’t going to strafe the traffic on the parkway — i.e., me. It would have been easy enough. The south tower collapsed and it was still only 9:50 a.m. The area was evacuated. There was no immediate report on casualties. We were to learn not much later that many police and firefighters didn’t make it out.

President Bush spoke to the nation from Sarasota, Florida, where he had been visiting an elementary school. He tried to sound reassuring, but it was obvious he wasn’t sure what was going on. No one was. There simply weren’t enough facts available yet. Even before I reached work he was airborne, in Air Force One, headed for Louisiana and from there to Nebraska. Vice President Cheney was in Washington. The Capital and the west wing of the White House were being evacuated. The FAA shut down takeoffs and flights in the air were told to land in Canada.

At my office someone had brought in a television and nothing got done. We watched a snowy picture from Washington’s Channel 4. There were more rumors, delivered in authoritative tones, cunningly disguised as reports. Then there was the confirmation on the story about the airliner down in a field in Pennsylvania. It was United Airlines Flight 93, carrying 45 people, out of Newark, N.J. There was speculation that it had been headed toward either Washington – the White House? The Capitol? – or perhaps Camp David. It crashed 80 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. Had it been shot down? Had the passengers crashed it? It seemed unlikely the hijackers had. An empty field didn’t make much of a target.

Goddard Space Flight Center, a couple blocks from where I work, was locked down. I wondered what the terrorists would blow up there – the souvenir shop? Cubicles filled with engineers? The finance office? It didn’t make sense, but I still found myself trying to calculate what the blast range would be for a nuclear device set off in downtown Washington. I wasn’t happy with the results.

Dan Rather came on the box and his head talked. There was nothing memorable, only the uncertainty. He didn’t know much more than we knew. Maybe not even as much. At 10:30 the north tower collapsed. There had been an hour available for evacuations; how many people could evacuate from what had been 110 stories in an hour? How many stairwells were there? How many people could walk abreast? There would be losses from smoke inhalation. Many people would have been horribly burned but still ambulatory. There were blind and otherwise disabled people who worked in the building. How to get a wheelchair down, say, 80 flights of stairs? Much later we would learn that as many as 18,000 people evacuated the two towers.

Mayor Rudolph Giuliani publicly urged New Yorkers to stay calm and stay put -- unless they were below Canal Street in lower Manhattan. "If you're south of Canal Street, get out," he warned. "Just walk north." He didn’t add not to stop, but New Yorkers guessed that part.


Things started to clear up a little as the day wore on. Government buildings around the US were evacuated and facilities – Goddard among them, which meant my office, too – closed down. The UN closed down. US financial markets closed down. Mayor Giuliani called for the evacuation of lower Manhattan. Vice President Cheney and first lady Laura Bush were whisked away to undisclosed locations in the morning, while the Secret Service hustled and worried. Some Congressional leaders, such as Speaker Dennis Hastert, were taken to Andrews Air Force Base. Others, like House Majority Whip Tom DeLay and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt, as well as some Senate leaders where taken to police headquarters just blocks from the Capitol. All leaders were eventually moved by helicopter and limo to hideouts in West Virginia and Virginia, like Mt. Weather, an underground communications center near Round Hill, Va., some 75 miles from Washington.

President Bush, speaking again, this time from Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, told us that US armed forces were on maximum alert. He vowed to "hunt down and punish" those responsible. We all hoped that was true; Bill Clinton had used almost the same words in the wake of the bombings of our embassies in Africa. The nation was still waiting for results.

The Drudge Report had some information. Fox’s web site had some, as did CNN, MSNBC, and others. Gradually some of the rumor was sorted out from the scanty fact. There was a traffic jam on the way home. Bush touched down at Offutt AFB in Nebraska, and was soon back in the air, on his way to Washington. A network of Navy warships was deployed along both coasts for air defense. Landmark buildings and sites were shut down, from the Space Needle in Seattle to the Sears Tower in Chicago to Walt Disney World in Orlando. The borders with Canada and Mexico were sealed. New York's mayoral primary was postponed. So was Major League Baseball's schedule, followed quickly by professional football. Nobody cared at the moment, except maybe the players and not all of them.

The military command center in Colorado's Cheyenne Mountain, responsible for U.S. air defenses, received word just 10 minutes before the first aircraft struck the World Trade Center that an American plane had been hijacked. The notification came too late for fighter jets to take action.


The TV was on as I walked in the door, with Gloria glued to it. We watched the scenes of the attacks over and over as each new bit of news was added to what Fox – and MSNBC and CNN – had to say. We saw the tapes of the towers collapsing. We heard about the people who jumped, rather than be burned alive; the Spanish-language stations ran footage of some of them. One pair, a man and a woman, held hands. It was sickening, horrible. It was beyond mere words. At 5:30 structurally weakened Seven World Trade Center collapsed.

The news channels showed us the images of smashed fire trucks, covered in gray dust and ash. There were first estimates of how many had died, still just guesses. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas was informed that the casualty figures would likely range between 15,000 and 25,000. There were fears that other nearby buildings were structurally damaged and that they would collapse as well. There were still fears of further attacks, on the Empire State Building, on the Sears Tower. Amtrak train and Greyhound bus operations were halted in the Northeast. The bridges leading into and out of New York were locked down.

By evening the fires were still burning amid the rubble of the World Trade Center. Pools of highly flammable jet fuel continued to hinder rescue teams who were still searching through the rubble, despite their losses.


Our country had been attacked and the realization was stunning. For the first time since 1814 the USA’s soil had been subject to naked, vicious aggression by a foreign power. The attacks had been aimed at symbols of American power, as though to destroy them would be to destroy what they represented. The thought that had gone into selecting them was from one point of view effective – strikes against “symbols of oppression and greed.” From a practical point of view, the point of view that would have been taken by a professional military planner, they were ineffectual because they were totemistic. The US military is no more the Pentagon than US economic power was confined to the World Trade Center. So Clue Number One was in that sense reassuring: the enemy, whoever he was, was not a competent general. He was a tactician but not a strategist. Symbolic attacks don’t win wars; destruction of the enemy’s command structure does. When that’s gone, the enemy forces can be rolled up practically at leisure.

Congress – both Republicans and Democrats - declared its support for Bush in finding and punishing those responsible. "We are outraged at this cowardly attack on the people of the United States," Congress said in a bipartisan statement. "Our heartfelt prayers are with the victims and their families, and we stand strongly united behind the President as our commander-in-chief." Members concluded their session by singing "God Bless America" on the steps of the Capitol.

In the course of that day, President Bush spoke to the nation three times. The first was the quick talk I had heard on the radio, from Florida before leaving for Louisiana. The second, nearly as brief, was from Offutt. That evening he spoke again, at a little more length, and we listened:
These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed; our country is strong.

A great people has been moved to defend a great nation. Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shattered steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.

America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world. And no one will keep that light from shining.

Today, our nation saw evil, the very worst of human nature. And we responded with the best of America--with the daring of our rescue workers, with the caring for strangers and neighbors who came to give blood and help in any way they could.
"We will make no distinction," Bush warned, "between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them."

Despite the fears of further attacks, there was a national growl of defiance, a national thirst for vengeance. If the terrorists had expected to throw the nation into confusion they had succeeded. If they had expected us to collapse in fear they had failed. They had aroused a national fury unseen since Pearl Harbor. Sen. Hutchison spoke for us all when she said that we should determine with a moral certainty who did it; issue an ultimatum to whatever country was involved to give the person up; and if not, "We should go in, attack them, and wipe them off the face of the earth." The nation accepted the concept of being at war – we weren’t quite sure with whom, not yet – with no hesitation.

Libertarian writer and weblogger Virginia Postrel passed on the story of a man who worked as a prosecutor in Galveston. He cut through the minimum security wing of the jail on an errand. All the prisoners were gathered around the televisions, wearing their orange jumpsuits, following the story with their jailers and with the same reactions. Even Bad hates Evil.


There were three attacks. The plane that went down in Pennsylvania was supposed to have been the fourth. Minutes before United Airlines Flight 93 crashed outside Pittsburgh, passenger Jeremy Glick used his cell phone to call his wife in New Jersey. He told her that he and several other people on board were going to resist the hijackers. Knowing the chances were good that he would die, Glick told his wife, Lyzbeth, that he hoped she would have a good life, and to take care of their 3-month old baby girl. Alice Hoglan of California also got to say goodbye to her son, Mark Bingham. He also spoke of a plan to tackle the hijackers in a last-minute cell phone call. One of the other people on Flight 93, Tom Burnett, the vice president of a northern California medical devices company, also managed to call his wife from the plane before going to his death. And Todd Beamer also talked to his wife. The last words she heard him say were the words he used to fire up his kids: “Let’s roll!”

We had forgotten what it was like to have heroes. Beamer, Glick, Bingham, Burnett and those who went with them rushed the hijackers. They fought them hard, the flight recorder would later attest just how hard. And rather than giving control of the aircraft back to the Americans, the fanatics smashed the plane into the Pennsylvania countryside. The men and women who resisted them went down fighting to the last.

US Solicitor General Ted Olsen was lucky enough to talk to his wife, Barbara, on American Flight 77, via cell phone before her plane smashed into the Pentagon. Barbara Olsen was brilliant and witty, a ferocious political partisan who had written Hell to Pay, an exposÚ on then-First Lady Hillary Clinton. She was a fixture on political talk shows, had another book coming out on the sordid last days of the Clinton administration and she was on her way to Los Angeles. “What should I tell the pilot to do?” she asked her husband. Whatever she told the pilot, Barbara Olsen died trying. Charles Burlingame, the pilot of American Flight 77, was bludgeoned to death before the plane hit the Pentagon. He died trying, too.

We were to learn later, after flight recorders had been recovered, that the pilot of Flight 11, which had hit the World Trade Center, had also fought the hijackers. On all of the four planes, Americans had died trying.

By the next day we were busy with the long process of fitting the pieces together and putting together a response.
Link


Home Front
Jeremy Glick, RIP
2001-09-12
  • As United Airlines Flight 93 entered its last moments there was terror and violence on board — but also heroism. Minutes before the airliner smashed into a field southeast of Pittsburgh, passenger Jeremy Glick used a cell phone to call his wife at home in New Jersey and told her that he and several other people on board had come up with a plan to resist the terrorists who had hijacked the plane. Anticipating his own death, Glick, who celebrated his 31st birthday on Sept. 3, told his wife, Lyzbeth, that he hoped she would have a good life and would take care of their 3-month old baby girl. Alice Hoglan of California says her son, Mark Bingham, also spoke of a plan to tackle the hijackers in a last-minute cell phone call to her. (By Charles Lane Washington Post Staff Writer)
  • Link


    Blogging as addictive behavior
    2002-04-08
  • Sgt Stryker muses on blogging and why he does it.
    I'd keep writing this shit even if no one was reading it. I do this first and foremost for my own benefit, and if anyone else gets anything out of it, then it's icing on the cake. This blog thing has been cathartic as all get out, and I find myself feeling better as I purge the toxins of frustration from my system by writing everything out here. When I first started out, no one was reading this and it didn't matter one whit.
    I can sympathize only too well. I've been stuck in the seemingly endless loop of compiling Rantburg since 9-11. It's like reading a book you can't put down, only I'm writing it. One of these days there are going to be a lot of books covering the War on Terror, but for now we don't know how it's going to turn out. Hell, it's possible we could even lose. The books might be in Arabic and not read a thing like what we've been watching. But I'm betting we'll win in the end.

    Talk about a cast of thousands. Try millions. We have an International Criminal Mastermind with more than a few overtones of the Insidious Doctor Fu Manchu. We have venal dictators and crafty Oriental Potentates and shadowy international arms merchants. Raymond Chandler suggested that when you don't know what should happen next, have a man with a gun step through the door. We have gunnies, snuffies, even giggling psychopaths. There are sniveling cowards looking frantically for someone, anyone, to surrender to, and Internationally Renowned Perfessors demanding to be on the other side, even though the other side's plans for the likes of them include walls and blindfolds. There are spittle-spraying, eye-rolling beturbaned religious fanatics, whipping up the masses for Holy War. There's the plain-talkin' Texas president, underestimated by friend and foe alike (see Destry Rides Again), opposing a shadowy Council of Boskone. We have Chamberlains, Quislings, and more than a few Duces and Fuehrers and generalissimos, riots in the streets, plucky reporters and reporterettes, in fact all the elements necessary for either something by Tolstoy or Dostoevsky or maybe an excruciatingly bad 1930s novel. Or maybe both, with elements of Wagner. And Tom Clancy and Ian Fleming.

    "There are no heroes," the nay-sayers said in their querelous post-modernist, Peace Studies voices. Don't they look stupid now? We have our heroes to go with our villains, every bit as magnificent in their bravery and goodness as the other side is mired in Evil. Just think of the matter-of-fact heroism of NYPD and FDNY, going in because there was a chance the buildings wouldn't fall down. We have Todd Beamer, Jeremy Glick, Tom Burnett, Mark Bingham, and Barbara Olson, resisting to the last. Mike Spann and Daniel Pearl, just doing their jobs, with danger and treachery all around them. Soldiers who are by God Heroic in their dedication and bravery, and even some allies who are true blue. And we have men and women who either don't get in the papers at all or who're mentioned once, like those who clobbered Shoe Boy.

    I'll keep compiling Rantburg because I've got to know what happens next.
    And I'll keep reading because, IMHO, your site is still the best place to pull all the threads together. Thanks for continuing!
    Posted by Old Grouch 4/8/2002 10:14:12 PM
    Thanks, y'old grouch. I'll be here. I can't stop...
    Posted by Fred 4/9/2002 9:27:28 AM
  • Link



    Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
    -7 More