Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Fifth Column
The Life and Times of Ramsey Clark
2006-04-29
Saddam Hussein's lawyer is walking in Greenwich Village, admiring the brave buds of a skeletal tree slowly stirring from winter sleep. In the twilight of his life, he notices such things: the advent of spring, the daily opera that plays on the streets of Manhattan, the small, simple pleasures that still stir his soul.
He is an old man, untroubled by the fact that his latest client is a former dictator. In his 78 years, he has represented many infamous men and many divisive causes, the latest of which is to impeach President Bush and dispatch his administration.
"So, Mr. Clark," yells a young man standing on the sidewalk. "Are we going to get those (expletives) out of office?"
Ummmmmmmmmmmm...nope.
Texas gentility rarely fails Ramsey Clark — U.S. attorney general under Lyndon Baines Johnson — even when strangers hurl vulgarities on the street."I hope so," he answers, in a polite voice branded by a Dallas drawl.
Ever been accused of any war crimes, kid? Here's my card, just in case...
People have said worse things — to him and about him. In his very public life, he has been called misguided, a traitor, a Communist and a fool. People have said good things, too — the NAACP and the ACLU have lauded his civil rights work.
Well, then I'm sold...
So have despots and dictators — like his newest client, Saddam Hussein, who faces death by hanging if convicted in a chaotic Baghdad trial marked by assassinations of attorneys, emotional meltdowns and shouting matches with the judge. There have been many others in the last 40 years. Clark has offered legal counsel and advice to a rogue's gallery of the accused: Nazi concentration camp boss Karl Linnas; Liberia's Charles Taylor, now charged with crimes against humanity; Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, on the run from charges of genocide; former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, who died last month in his cell in The Hague while on trial for war crimes; Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, the Rwandan Seventh Day Adventist pastor convicted by the U.N., with his son, of herding thousands of Tutsis into a church compound and then calling in rival Hutus, who killed them in an all-day massacre.
Are you a homicidal dictator? Facing charges on crimes against humanity? Being accused of genocide? Then call me at 1-800-RAMSEY. Operators available 24 hours a day. Se habla espanol...
He accepts these clients, he says, for the sake of justice and to uphold the right of every person to a fair and impartial trial. "Especially those people," he says, "who allegedly did terrible things."
I think he has some bizarre attraction to them myself. He's like a serial lawyer.
William Ramsey Clark is a complicated and contradictory man.
Wow. Like Shaft?
A conversation with him entails listening to legal constructs and the rules of justice — as they pertain to his clients. Is Saddam's prosecuting body, the Iraqi Special Tribunal, a legal entity? No, in his view. Is Saddam getting a fair trial? A resounding no. Is there any evidence that Milosevic, whose funeral he attended, actually ordered mass rapes and killings in the former Yugoslavia? Absolutely not, he says.
Other then all those dead people? Nope.
But there is no mention of the humanity lost under the rule of his clients, or of the evils of genocide and murder. Or of what should be done with people who commit them. Instead, he lives in a reality of his own making, where the rules of rhetoric and logic apply to circumstances of his choosing. There is no evil. There is no death penalty. There are no prisons.
He hesitates when asked what should replace the later two. "I don't believe in punishment," he says. Pressed to be more specific, he thinks a long while. Finally, he describes a place with "quarters that are reasonably comfortable, where guests can be received. Adequate food and clothing and health care. Where the family could come and live."
...and we could all just sit around and talk about all the thousands of Rwandans and Kurds and Liberians and Yugoslavians and all the other millions they butchered not so long ago. Good times...good times...
Such thoughts have fueled some of the more benign criticism of Clark over the years — that he is gullible and misinformed. New Yorker correspondent Jon Lee Anderson, in his book "The Fall of Baghdad," described Clark as "well intentioned but morally blind." Hearing that line, Clark appears wounded. "Well," he says softly. "That's interesting."
Honestly, Ramsey? I think your mentally ill.
He was born in Dallas to a privileged family. He married his college sweetheart, Georgia Welch, and recently celebrated his 57th wedding anniversary. They have two children — a son who is an environmental lawyer and a daughter, who suffers from mental retardation and has lived her entire life in the care of her parents. "She is the joy of our life," says Clark.
He is the son of Tom Clark, whom Harry Truman appointed attorney general and then to the U.S. Supreme Court.
As I remember, I think Truman thought this was one of the worst decisions of his presidency.
Ramsey Clark, at age 18, joined the Marine Corps when his parents moved to Washington, D.C. Gung-ho and ready to fight, Clark said seeing the reality of war changed him on the spot. "I was appalled at what I saw. I couldn't hardly stand it."
Honorably discharged, he studied law at the University of Chicago. He practiced at his family's well-established Dallas law firm, then followed his dad's footsteps to the Justice Department. In 1967, President Johnson appointed Clark attorney general. It is said in Washington circles that Johnson had an ulterior motive. He wanted to appoint the first black to the Supreme Court. Tom Clark had to step down when his son was appointed the country's top prosecutor, to avoid a conflict of interest. Johnson replaced him with Thurgood Marshall.
As attorney general, Clark resisted J. Edgar Hoover's efforts to wiretap Martin Luther King Jr. (Hoover did it anyway) and championed civil rights. Then, in 1968, he prosecuted Vietnam war opponent and pediatrician Dr. Benjamin Spock on charges of conspiracy to counsel, aid, and abet resistance to the draft.
He sees no contradictions in the narrative of his life. "I can't tell you that I've changed all that much," he says. "I wouldn't call it radical change. I would call it growth." Nonetheless, leaving Washington in 1968, Clark took a decided turn to the left. And kept going.
He joined the anti-war movement and traveled to North Vietnam in 1972. He ran twice for the U.S. Senate and lost both times.
In 1980, at the height of the hostage crisis, he visited Tehran to attend a forum about U.S. crimes against Iran. Later he voiced support for Libya's Moammar Gadhafi.
If you've got a show trial and you need a prominent "American" to embarrass the United States, call 1-800-RAMSEY. Operators on duty 24 hours a day, se habla espanol.
In 1992, he represented Karadzic, who arrived in New York for United Nations deliberations and was handed federal subpoenas for a civil suit filed by Bosnian refugee women accusing him of ordering mass rapes and other war crimes. Karadzic, indicted three years later for genocide and crimes against humanity, now tops the most-wanted list at the U.N. war crimes tribunal in The Hague.
Clark also represented Charles Taylor, who was arrested in New York in the 1980s on charges of looting his country. Taylor escaped from jail via knotted bedsheets and fled the United States.
Clark first met Saddam in 1990, when the Iraqi leader sought advice on how to deal with Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, who was threatening war over Hussein's invasion of neighboring Kuwait. "I told him that I thought he had no possibility of defending himself against an American invasion and that his country would be destroyed," recalls Clark. He also remembers the dictator agreeing with him. Though Saddam didn't agree for long, to disastrous effect. "An arrogant person would have been upset," Clark says. "He's a listener. First and foremost, he's human being."
A real... people person, right, Ramsey?
They met again last year. This time, the dictator was deposed and in jail, charged with human rights abuses before the Iraqi Special Tribunal. He faces death by hanging if convicted; even if acquitted, he faces more trials. Most recently, he has been charged with genocide and crimes against humanity in a 1980s crackdown against the Kurds.
His first trial began in October, a contentious and cantankerous proceeding televised live. Saddam has ranted, prayed, refused to enter court, gotten into shouting matches with the judge — who responded by emptying the court room and holding the hearing in secret.
Clark, too, has lost patience. He and other defenders have stormed out of the courtroom, he has assailed the judge, on more than one occasion demanding an opportunity to address the court.
There has been bloodshed and murder. Days after the court convened, an Iraqi defense lawyer was dragged from his office and shot to death. A second lawyer was assassinated in Baghdad by gunmen who also wounded another member of the defense team.
Proceedings were adjourned until replacements could be found for the two dead men — and for a third attorney who fled the country fearing for his life.
"It is a three-ring circus," Clark says, and a travesty. But the problem, to Clark's mind, is not Saddam's behavior but the trial itself. Saddam is charged with the deaths of 148 Shiites who were tried and executed after an alleged assassination attempt on Saddam in 1982. Saddam and Clark acknowledge the deaths, but say that the dictator acted within the law.
See, it says right here, "Saddam can kill anybody he wants." So I move for dismissal, your honor. And could you make it quick because I have to get back to Washington to impeach the evil Bushitler...
Clark's fundamental criticism is that the Iraqi Special Tribunal — established and trained and funded by the United States — is an illegal entity that follows no legal procedures, most notably the right to due process. "I've never seen the crime scene, we can't get a transcript (of the hearings), the translation is terrible," he complains. "We know nothing about the witnesses' backgrounds. We don't know if they're actors or not. All we've got is people crying and talking about things that aren't always coherent."
Then you should fit right in...
Assistant U.S. Attorney Cliff Wardlaw, who spent a year in Iraq helping prosecutors and judges establish an open judicial system, has little patience with Saddam's lawyer. "All I have to do is see some quote from Ramsey Clark and I tune out," said Wardlaw, the federal prosecutor in Minnesota.
Good policy. I try to practice it myself.
Tribunal members were taken to The Hague and to London, where they observed "other bodies that are doing the same thing," Wardlaw said. "We're not telling them how to do it. We showed them how Nuremberg worked. It's providing a foundation of knowledge to them."
Nuremberg also holds great meaning for Clark. As a young Marine courier, he spent two days at the Nazi war crimes tribunal. At the defense table in Baghdad, he recalls the words of prosecutor Robert H. Jackson, a U.S. Supreme Court justice, in his opening statement at the trial of Hermann Goering, Albert Speer and 19 others:
"We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our lips as well." But Jackson also said some wrongs are "so calculated, so malignant and so devastating that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored."
And these are words that Clark does not quote.

Guess they just don't fit the agenda, do they Ramsey? So we'll ignore them...
Link


Iraq
Saddam trial judge attacked
2005-12-25
Armed men have tried to assassinate an investigative judge on the Iraqi Special Tribunal, a spokesman for the court says. The unnamed official said the attempt against Judge Munir Hadad had taken place on Friday as he was being escorted by a security convoy through Baghdad's western neighbourhood of Ghazaliya. No one was injured in the attack but some of the vehicles were damaged, he added.
"My Beemer! Those bastards scratched my fucking Beemer!"
Hadad's exact role on the tribunal that is trying Saddam Hussein and members of his former government, was unclear. There are about 20 investigative judges and up to 20 prosecutors on the tribunal. Hadad is not due to participate in the trial, which adjourned on Thursday, until 24 January.
Link


Iraq
Saddam mouthpieces to boycott court
2005-10-27
Whew, wotta relief. On with the trial ...
AMMAN - Lawyers representing Saddam Hussein announced on Wednesday that they will boycott the special tribunal trying the ousted Iraqi president until they are given better security. “In view of the dangerous security conditions in Iraq and their impact on Iraqi members of the defence team, along with the never-ending threats against them and their families ... a decision has been taken to fully boycott the Iraqi Special Tribunal,” said a statement issued by the Jordan-based team including lead counsel Khalil Al Dulaimi.

The decision followed the killing of Saadun Janabi, an attorney representing one of Saddam’s co-defendants, just a day after the opening of the trial.
Link


Iraq
Iraqi Court to Open Saddam Trial Wed.
2005-10-18
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Saddam Hussein and seven senior members of his 23-year regime will go on trial Wednesday to face charges they ordered the 1982 killings of nearly 150 people from the mainly Shiite town of Dujail following a failed attempt on Saddam's life. Court officials have said they are trying Saddam on the Dujail massacre first because it was the easiest and quickest case to put together. Other cases they are investigating - including a crackdown on the Kurds that killed an estimated 180,000 people - involve much larger numbers of victims, more witnesses and more documentation. If convicted, Saddam and his co-defendants could face the death penalty, but they could appeal before another chamber of the Iraqi Special tribunal.

Saddam and his co-defendants are expected to hear the charges against them during Wednesday's hearing, and the court will address procedural matters. The trial is then expected to be adjourned for several weeks.

Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari complained Monday that the Iraqi court took an unjustifiably long time to prepare its case and brushed aside concerns that the court could be biased against the former dictator. "I don't think there are any more clear-cut crimes in the world than those committed by Saddam," said the Shiite Muslim leader, five of whose close relatives, including an older brother, were executed by Saddam's regime in the 1980s and 1990s.

He underlined, however, that the deaths in his family did not mean that he would get a sense of personal satisfaction if the former dictator is eventually executed. "I try to forget what happened to my brother and my cousins. It is never an issue of revenge or personal malice," al-Jaafari said during a 2 1/2-hour meeting with journalists over "iftar," the sunset meal Muslims eat to break their fast during the month of Ramadan.

Al-Jaafari's Shiite Dawa Party was blamed by the toppled regime for the attempt on Saddam's life in Dujail, a Dawa stronghold. Of the estimated 17 party members who opened fire on Saddam's motorcade, eight were killed in a shootout with troops from Saddam's elite Republican Guard. Nine others escaped and fled to Iran. Al-Jaafari, who took office in April as the head of a Shiite-Kurdish coalition, said he wanted Saddam to have a fair and open trial, but made it clear that he preferred the proceedings not drag on.

Saddam's regime was toppled in April 2003, but the former dictator was on the run for eight months before U.S. troops captured him near his hometown of Tikrit. He has since been kept in a U.S.-run facility thought to be at or near Baghdad International Airport.

At the meal with journalists, Al-Jaafari quoted classical Arabic poetry and praised the ideas of America's founding fathers. He also thanked the United States for ridding Iraq of Saddam, supporting the country's transition to democratic rule and its leadership of the war on terror.
"Saddam is gone and we are moving ahead while he is part of the past," he said. "His case doesn't belong to just one nation, but the whole world. Iraqis would like to see justice done."

Al-Jaafari said he was puzzled, though, by what he described as the long time it took the Iraqi Special Tribunal to compile evidence against Saddam in the Dujail case. "If we are to do a research project on Saddam's crimes, it will take a century to complete," he said.
"The Dujail case took enough time," he lamented. "Any more delay will bring Iraq, the judiciary and the government into question. It's the right of every Iraqi citizen to ask why it took so long to prepare the Dujail case."

Asked whether his comments could be seen as an attempt to influence the court to speed up its proceedings, al-Jaafari said: "I am not interfering in the court's business and I am not trying to put pressure on the court or influence it. On the contrary, I want it to exercise its authority both seriously and with transparency."

The Iraqi Special Tribunal that will try Saddam was set up during the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, which formally ended in June 2004. Although its statute was endorsed by Iraq's democratically elected parliament, critics have questioned the court's legitimacy.

Last week, the New York-based Human Rights Watch warned that the tribunal "runs the risk of "violating international standards for fair trials." "In Iraq's fragile political climate, the legitimacy of the court will be in question," it said in a statement. There have also been demands that Saddam be tried before the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

Al-Jaafari rebutted these complaints, arguing that Saddam's crimes were mostly against the Iraqi people, so he should be tried by Iraqis. "Why cannot a man who committed crimes against his own people be tried by the same people? Iraq's judiciary is just."
Link


Iraq
Likely Charges Against Saddam Outlined
2005-10-15
Ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein will likely face charges of premeditated murder, torture and forced expulsion and disappearances when he goes on trial next week for a 1982 massacre of Shiites, a court official said Thursday.

Saddam and seven other defendants are accused of killing 143 Shiites in the village of Dujail, north of Baghdad, after a failed assassination attempt against Saddam.

Prosecutors have not announced the exact charges, which are expected when the trial opens on Wednesday. Investigating judge Raid Juhi told reporters in Baghdad that the charges would focus on the areas of "crimes of premeditated murder, forced expulsion of residents, torture and forced disappearances of individuals."

Saddam could face the death penalty if convicted.

Juhi also reaffirmed that there would be no postponement of the trial's start, which Saddam's attorneys had sought to review documents they received on Sept. 25.

"The Special Tribunal has enabled the representatives of the defense through all legal means to completely review all the evidence, documents and investigation papers," he said.

The trial is expected to be the first of about a dozen involving crimes against humanity committed by Saddam and his regime's henchmen during his 23-year rule. These include the 1988 gassing of up to 5,000 Kurds in Halabja and the bloody 1991 suppression of a Shiite uprising in the south after a U.S.-led coalition drove the Iraqi army out of Kuwait.

Some of those cases "are about to be concluded in a few days" and will then be handed over to the Iraqi Special Tribunal for trial, Juhi said. He did not specify which cases or whether Saddam would be a defendant in all of them.

It is not known when the next trial would start. It has taken three months between the time the Dujail case was presented to the court and the trial's start.

Saddam, 68, has been jailed under American control at a U.S. military detention complex since his December 2003 capture near his hometown, Tikrit.

The Dujail case is being tried first because it was the easiest case to prepare, court officials have said. There will be no jury. The court's five judges will question witnesses and render the verdicts.

Due to Iraq's precarious security, the judge's identities have not been revealed and may remain concealed during the trial. Juhi will not be among them. Also, witnesses are likely to testify from behind a screen to protect their identities.

The massacres were in response to a July 8, 1982, assassination attempt staged by villagers at the height of Saddam's power, court officials said. Gunmen opened fire on Saddam's motorcade as he passed through town, but he was unhurt. In swift retaliation, Iraqi army helicopters fired on villagers, and troops rounded up and imprisoned residents. Some are still missing.

The seven other defendants in the Dujail trial includes Saddam's then-intelligence chief, Barazan Ibrahim; his vice president Taha Yassin Ramadan; Awad Hamed al-Bandar, the head of the Revolutionary court; and four senior Baath Party officials in the Dujail region, Abdullah Kazim Ruwayyid, Ali Dayim Ali, Mohammed Azawi Ali and Mizhar Abdullah Ruwayyid.

The Iraqi Special Tribunal was created during the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq, which began in April 2003 and formally ended 14 months later. Its statute, however, was endorsed by Iraq's democratically elected parliament this year.
Link


Iraq
Five judges chosen for Saddam Hussein's trial
2005-10-03
Five judges have been chosen for the much-anticipated trial this month of toppled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein over the massacre of Shiite villagers in 1982, a source close to the court said. "Five magistrates will try Saddam Hussein," the Iraqi Special Tribunal source said without identifying the judges. Saddam and seven of his former henchmen are due to go on trial on October 19 for killing 143 Shiites in the village of Dujail, north of Baghdad in 1982, following an attempt on his life. The eight face the death penalty if found guilty.
Link


Iraq
Saddam Has 'confessed' To Massacres, Court Source Says
2005-09-30
Baghdad, 30 Sept. (AKI) - A senior source at the international tribunal handling the trial of Saddam Hussein says the former dictator has admitted having carried out mass killings in the city of Dujail and in other locations. "These confessions made by Saddam during interrogation sessions have been recorded in both video and audio form, and corroborate the testimony of some of the top figures in his regime who accuse him," the source told Adnkronos International (AKI), speaking on the condition of anonymity. "During the trial [due to start 19 October] the tribunal will confront him with these testimonies," the tribunal official declared.
Sammy always did like to brag
Saddam Hussein and eight of his aides will be brought to trial on charges of killing 143 Shiites - including the elderly, women and children - in Dujail village in north Baghdad in 1982. The massacre followed a failed assassination attempt against him.

The tribunal official dismissed statements to the media by two of Saddam's lawyers, Khalil al-Dulaymi and Khamis al-Ubaydi, in which they said they had not read the documents backing up the charges against the former leader and had not been informed of the trial starting date.
He told AKI the two men had been informed according to procedure, but were trying to invent an excuse to not follow the proceedings, noting that "the two lawyers have little experience in similar questions of extreme importance at both local and international level". The source also said that "the trial of Saddam will be public and will be transmitted live on television".
Hopefully, so will the execution
Earlier this month, Iraqi president Jalal Talabani told state television that Saddam had confessed to some crimes committed under his regime. Talabani said he had been told by a judge that "he was able to extract confessions from Saddam's mouth" about crimes "such as executions" personally ordered by the dictator. The Iraqi Special Tribunal has decided to try Saddam separately for different offences, rather than bring them all together in one trial. The Dujail case is the only one referred to trial so far. He could get the death penalty for that alone if found guilty.
Link


Iraq
Saddam's Lawyers Won't Recognize Oct 19th Trial Date
2005-09-21
AMMAN, Jordan - Saddam Hussein's lawyers won't recognize the Oct. 19 start of the former leader's trial because they claim they have not been notified of the date by the Iraqi Special Tribunal, the attorneys said Wednesday.

The lawyers "will not recognize any date for the trial if it comes within weeks or months," said Khalil Dulaimi, Saddam's Iraqi lawyer, in a statement issued from Baghdad.

Dulaimi did not specify what the defense lawyers will do if no notification has been served by the time the trial opens.

Another Saddam lawyer, Britain-based Abdel Haq Alani, told The Associated Press in a telephone interview that the legal team "must be served notice stating a trial date, and that hasn't happened."

Saddam and seven other members of his toppled regime are due to stand trial in the tribunal on Oct. 19. They are charged with ordering a massacre of 143 people in Dujail, a town north of Baghdad, in 1982 after a failed assassination attempt against the ousted leader. If convicted, Saddam could be sentenced to death.

Hmmmm too bad. Hang him
Link


Iraq-Jordan
Draft Iraqi anti-terror law could keep hangman busy
2005-09-07
Iraqi MPs debated sweeping anti-terror legislation that would make even crimes such as vandalism subject to the death penalty in a bid to quell the raging insurgency...
The wide-ranging anti-terror bill proposes the death penalty not only for those guilty of "terrorist" acts, but for accomplices and those advocating "sectarian strife", according to a copy obtained by AFP.

The bill, which was being discussed behind closed doors and could be amended, lists eight offences that could qualify as terrorist acts, including "violence ... vandalism against public buildings ... forming armed gangs ... and using explosives to kill people." Possible offences also include "advocating sectarian sedition or civil war through arming citizens or mobilising them to carry arms against each other".

Attacking Iraqi soldiers and police, as well as diplomatic missions, could also lead to execution, as could kidnapping for political, sectarian, ethnic or racial reasons.

"The culprit or accomplice in the act would be executed" along with "the instigator, the plotter, and whoever assists in any of the aforementioned crimes," the draft says.

Its authors defended the bill's harshness in the face of the mostly Sunni-led insurgency, saying "damage caused by terrorist acts has reached such a point that it threatens national unity and stability."

The death penalty was rescinded during the US-led occupation but restored by the US-installed caretaker government in August 2004 despite opposition from key US ally Britain and other European states. Its application, most notably against ousted dictator Saddam Hussein if he is found guilty by the Iraqi Special Tribunal, remains hotly disputed...

"We need to protect Iraq and the world against terrorists," said Jawad al-Maliki, an MP from the ruling Dawa party, adding that a vote on the bill was expected within a few days...
Link


Iraq-Jordan
Iraq blocks Saddam family bid to fire his lawyers
2005-08-15
AMMAN - The Iraqi tribunal trying Saddam Hussein on war crimes charges has blocked a bid by his family to fire his vast team of defence lawyers, saying only Saddam can make such a move, the family said on Sunday.
Lance Ito, call your office.
Last week a lawyer acting for Saddam’s eldest daughter Raghad said the family had scrapped the team of more than 2,000 attorneys claiming to be representing Saddam and would build a new, better-organised defence team.
Organizing a team of 2,000 lawyers can be such a challenge ...
But the Iraqi Special Tribunal, the court set up to try the former president and other senior members of his regime, blocked the family’s effort to shake up the defence team. “We want to clarify some issues relating to the request to revoke all powers of attorney. We are very surprised by such unlawful acts. The exclusive right to empower any lawyer or to cancel any power of attorney is for defendant Saddam Hussein,” said a letter sent by the tribunal and obtained by Reuters.

Saddam’s family says many of the lawyers claiming to represent him were never formally appointed and are more interested in self-promotion than mounting a serious defence. It says they often gave conflicting legal opinions.
At least 2,000 different opinions, many times more.
More than 2,000 lawyers had volunteered for Saddam’s defence team, including former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark and a daughter of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Others who said they were on the team included Anglo-Italian lawyer Giovanni di Stefano who once worked on behalf of former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, and Roland Dumas, a colourful octogenarian who served as French foreign minister from 1988 to 1993 and acted as executor of Pablo Picasso’s estate.

A letter sent by Raghad to the tribunal said the family was entitled to choose Saddam’s defence team because the ousted dictator president was not able to make such decisions freely himself. “The family of the dictator president is free to choose whoever it wants to defend him and to remove whoever it wants for as long as he is denied freedom of choice,” Raghd’s letter said.

Sources close to the family said they hoped the tribunal would change its position, possibly under US pressure.
Keep hoping.
The family demanded the presence of newly recruited lawyers alongside Khalil Dulaimi, the Iraqi lawyer who attends Saddam’s court hearings, to ensure Saddam had adequate legal representation for a fair trial.

Raghd said legal advice the family was getting from senior British lawyers whose identity has been kept confidential was to boycott the tribunal or any committee interrogating Saddam until her father was given access to heavyweight lawyers from abroad.
Namely, a group of 'senior British lawyers'.
The new team was ready to come to Baghdad as soon as the Iraqi special court gave them permission, Raghd said. “We all able and willing to send legal specialists as soon as the legitimate tribunal your occupying masters allow them,” the letter said, referring to US-led forces in Iraq.

Raghd also criticised the tribunal for preventing her family from seeing Saddam, who aside from seeing a lawyer is isolated from the rest of the world. The tribunal denies that Saddam has had his rights infringed. So far Saddam has been formally charged in only one case the killing of Shias in the village of Dujail following a failed assassination attempt in 1982. Officials say his trial could begin within two months.

If when found guilty, he will get faces the death penalty.
Link


Iraq-Jordan
Saddam's Lawyers Won't Attend Proceedings
2005-08-03
Saddam Hussein's lawyers will not take part in legal proceedings until the Iraqi tribunal acknowledges he was attacked in court and guarantees the safety of all defendants and attorneys, a lawyer for the former dictator said Tuesday. Members of Saddam's defense team claimed Saturday the former Iraqi president was attacked during a court appearance last week. The government and the Iraqi Special Tribunal said there had been no attack.

But Khalil al-Dulaimi, a lawyer for Saddam who attended the court appearance, insisted the allegation was true and demanded the government acknowledge it. He also insisted the tribunal apologize, guarantee the safety of Saddam and other former regime figures, and punish the attacker. He said Saddam's lawyers would stop attending any further proceedings "until our demands are met."
I'm not sure not showing up in court is the best way to win your case. In fact, I'm sure it's not.
Link


Iraq-Jordan
Man attacks Saddam in court
2005-07-30
FORMER Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was attacked by an unidentified man during his appearance at a court hearing in Baghdad yesterday, his defence team said today.

The team, which has an office in the Jordanian capital Amman, said in a statement that the man attacked Saddam and the two exchanged blows during a hearing attended by defence lawyer Khalil Dulaimi.

"As the president stood to leave the courtroom one of those present attacked him and there was an exchange of blows between the man and the president," the statement said.

The head of the tribunal did nothing to stop the assault, the statement alleged.

It did not say if Saddam was hurt.

The Iraqi Special Tribunal trying Saddam released photographs yesterday of the toppled leader being questioned on the suppression of Kurdish and Shiite uprisings in 1991.

The photographs were taken during a hearing in Baghdad yesterday, the tribunal said.

Saddam has been formally charged with the killings of Shiite Muslims in the village of Dujail in 1982 but no date has been set for his trial.

Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More