International-UN-NGOs |
Follow That |
2006-01-02 |
The tantrum with which Secretary General Annan greeted the now famous question about the missing Mercedes Benz tells us a lot about the tensions that are building at the United Nations, The Mercedes Benz, described as a "sporty green" Jeep-type vehicle, is missing somewhere in Africa, The car was, however, not purchased under Kojo Annan's name, but under his father's. Claiming diplomatic discount helped in shaving 14.3% off the Mercedes ticket price of just under $40,000. A Ghanaian-based United Nations Development Program official, Abdoulie Janneh, helped in promoting the diplomatic immunity, and the car's owner avoided just over $20,000 in dues and shipping expenses as it was imported from Switzerland to Mr. Annan's homeland of Ghana. Some questions lingered since the Volcker committee ended its $34 million investigation in November. Many of those surrounded Mr. Annan's role - or lack thereof - in landing a U.N. contract for his son's employer, Cotecna. But none was as straightforward as the one that became a staple of the daily noon briefings: Where is that car? Since Mr. Bone and others began asking it, neither the secretary general nor any of his aides or spokesmen has been able to come up with a simple answer. On November 20, our Benny Avni e-mailed the question to Mr. Annan's lawyer, Gregory Craig, who has yet to produce an answer. A week later, a spokesperson vaguely promised that Kojo Annan's lawyers will have some comment on the car "soon," but as of yet they have supplied none. Failing to explain The question that lingers for us is why such a simple question needs so much attention from lawyers or spokespersons anyway. The fact that brilliant advocates like Mr. Craig et al. were unable to craft a simple answer after so many weeks that the issue has been in the limelight, hurting Mr. Annan's image so badly, is bizarre. Either there is some deep dark secret that needs to be protected, or another factor is at work here. In October Mr. Annan has publicly told our Mr. Avni that his "world is so small," urging him to "move on" and stop asking |
Link |
Britain |
Gorgeous George hit by US criminal investigation |
2005-10-31 |
![]() The Respect MP told senators under oath in May that neither he nor anyone on his behalf had benefited from the oil-for-food regime conducted by Saddam. Last week, however, two reports - one from the US Senate, the other from the Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC) of the United Nations - claimed his wife and a close friend working in Iraq had received oil funds granted by Saddam for Galloway. The chairman of the Senate Committee, Norm Coleman, sent a dossier containing both his evidence and that provided by the UN to prosecutors on Friday. As perjury is a felony in America, Galloway could face trial in front of a jury, and a prison sentence of up to five years. They have also sent their report, with the findings by the IIC, to Sir Phillip Marr, the standards commissioner for the House of Commons, and to the Charity Commission for England and Wales. The Charities Commission has stated it wants to examine the claims that illegal Iraqi oil money was laundered through a charity - the Mariam Appeal - on which Galloway was a trustee. Galloway denies the appeal was operating as a charity. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Russia skeptical about report on corruption in UN oil-for-food program |
2005-10-29 |
Russian politicians and business leaders on Friday issued a scathing response to a report documenting massive corruption in the UN oil-for-food program in Saddam Hussein's Iraq as companies around the world defended themselves from bribery charges. A day after the report's release, the head of the nation's electricity monopoly said its authors should be punished for including the name of a former Kremlin chief of staff now serving as its board chairman. Russia's biggest oil producer, Lukoil, suggested it had been named to divert attention from the world body's own failings. The report by the Independent Inquiry Committee led by former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker accuses more than 2,200 companies and prominent politicians of colluding with Saddam's regime to milk the humanitarian operation of $1.8 billion in kickbacks and illicit surcharges. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
U.N.: 2,000 Cos. Gave Iraq Illicit Funds |
2005-10-27 |
By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer UNITED NATIONS - More than 2,000 companies paid about $1.8 billion in illicit kickbacks and surcharges to Saddam Hussein's government through extensive manipulation of the U.N. oil-for-food program in Iraq, according to key findings of a U.N.-backed investigation obtained by The Associated Press. The report â to be released in full Thursday by the committee probing claims of wrongdoing in the $64 billion program â indicates that about half the 4,500 companies doing business with Iraq paid illegal surcharges on oil purchases or kickbacks on contracts to supply humanitarian goods. The investigators reported that companies and individuals from 66 countries paid illegal kickbacks through a variety of devices while those paying illegal oil surcharges came from, or were registered in, 40 countries. The names will be included in Thursday's report but were not in the key findings obtained Wednesday by the AP. Thursday's final report of the investigation led by former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker strongly criticizes the U.N. Secretariat and Security Council for failing to monitor the program and allowing the emergence of front companies and international trading concerns prepared to make illegal payments. According to the findings, the Banque Nationale de Paris S.A., known as BNP, which held the U.N. oil-for-food escrow account, had a dual role and did not disclose fully to the United Nations the firsthand knowledge it acquired about the financial relationships that fostered the payment of illegal surcharges. The oil-for-food program was one of the world's largest humanitarian aid operations, running from 1996-2003. Under the program, Iraq was allowed to sell limited and then unlimited quantities of oil provided most of the money went to buy humanitarian goods. It was launched to help ordinary Iraqis cope with U.N. sanctions imposed after Saddam's 1990 invasion of Kuwait and became a lifeline for 90 percent of the country's population of 26 million. But Saddam, who could choose the buyers of Iraqi oil and the sellers of humanitarian goods, corrupted the program by awarding contracts to â and getting kickbacks from â favored buyers, mostly parties who supported his regime or opposed the sanctions. He allegedly gave former government officials, journalists and U.N. officials vouchers for Iraqi oil that could then be resold at a profit. Tracing the politicization of oil contracts, the new report said Iraqi leaders in the late 1990s decided to deny American, British and Japanese companies allocations to purchase oil because of their countries' opposition to lifting sanctions on Iraq. At the same time, it said, Iraq gave preferential treatment to France, Russia and China which were perceived to be more favorable to lifting sanctions and were also permanent members of the Security Council. Volcker's previous report, released in September, said lax U.N. oversight allowed Saddam's regime to pocket $1.8 billion in kickbacks and surcharges in the awarding of contracts during the program's operation from 1997-2003. According to the new findings, Iraq's largest source of illicit income from the oil-for-food program was the more than $1.5 billion from kickbacks on humanitarian contracts. The smuggling of Iraqi oil outside the program in violation of U.N. sanctions poured much more money â $11 billion â into Saddam's coffers during the same period, according to a finding in the new report. Volcker's Independent Inquiry Committee calculated that more than 2,200 companies worldwide paid kickbacks to Iraq in the form of "fees" for transporting goods to the interior of the country or "after-sales-service" fees, or both. The report to be released Thursday chronicles Saddam's manipulation of the program and examines in detail 23 companies that paid kickbacks on humanitarian contracts including Iraqi front companies, major food providers, major trading companies, and major industrial and manufacturing companies. According to the findings, the program was just under three years old when the Iraqi regime began openly demanding illicit payments from its customers. The report said that while U.N. officials and the Security Council were informed, little action was taken. The report is the fifth by Volcker and wraps up a year-long, $34 million investigation that has faulted Secretary-General Kofi Annan, his deputy, Canada's Louise Frechette, and the Security Council for tolerating corruption and doing little to stop Saddam's manipulations. The investigation also accused Benon Sevan, the former head of the U.N. oil-for-food program, of taking $147,000 in illegal kickbacks. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | |
Annan Blasted for Keeping Adviser | |
2005-10-07 | |
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. employees union has criticized Secretary-General Kofi Annan for retaining his former chief-of-staff as an adviser despite accusations the aide authorized shredding three years of files on the corrupt oil-for-food program for Iraq. The Independent Inquiry Committee led by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker criticized Iqbal Riza for giving approval to shred the documents on April 22, 2004 - a day after the U.N. Security Council authorized an investigation into the oil-for-food program. A resolution adopted by the Staff Council, the union's executive, and obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, said keeping Riza as a personal adviser "is inconsistent with the requirement that all those working for the United Nations organization shall be of the highest integrity." The resolution was passed on Tuesday. The $64 billion oil-for-food program was the largest U.N. humanitarian aid operation, running from 1996-2003. It allowed Saddam Hussein's government to sell limited - and eventually unlimited - oil in exchange for food, medical supplies and other humanitarian goods as an exemption from tough U.N. sanctions imposed after Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Saddam Hussein, who could choose the buyers of Iraqi oil and the sellers of humanitarian goods, manipulated the program by awarding contracts to - and getting kickbacks from - favored buyers, who most often supported his regime or opposed the sanctions. He allegedly gave former government officials, journalists and U.N. officials vouchers for Iraqi oil that could then be resold at a profit. Riza has claimed the shredded files were duplicates. But a report by the Volcker committee said in March they included documents related to the oil-for-food program that were unavailable in the U.N. records file. Riza retired as Annan's chief-of-staff at the end of last year and then became a personal adviser to the secretary-general. He was replaced by Mark Malloch Brown. In a report in September, Volcker said Riza "played a greater role than he was willing to state" in the oil-for-food program. He was "the primary point of access to the secretary-general, routinely received copies of significant documents," and reviewed a March 7, 2001 memorandum on allegations of kickbacks and surcharges which he forwarded to the secretary-general. In an Aug. 29 letter to Volcker, Riza took issue with this assessment. He said he dealt with a vast range of subjects, which occasionally included the oil-for-food program. But it "certainly was not a subject with which I dealt regularly or frequently." Riza said he told investigators that although he had no clear recollection, he had probably seen news reports of kickbacks and participated in discussions where they came up. In late April, Annan said Riza's actions were careless, but not a deliberate attempt to impede the Volcker investigation and did not violate U.N. staff rules. A letter from Annan to Riza dated April 19 said: "I accept your apology and assure you that I still have great faith in your professionalism and well known integrity."
Volcker has also criticized Annan for his lack of oversight of the oil-for-food program and said he did not sufficiently investigate conflicts of interest involving his son. Kojo Annan was employed by a Swiss company that won an oil-for-food. But Volcker concluded there was not enough evidence to show that the secretary-general knew about the contract bid. | |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | ||||||
Probe: Saddam's Regime Pocketed $10.2B | ||||||
2005-09-08 | ||||||
![]() Secretary-General Kofi Annan called the findings ``deeply embarrassing to all of us'' and said he accepted the criticism leveled at him personally. But he said he had no intention of resigning.
``In essence, the responsibility for the failures must be broadly shared, starting, we believe, with member states and the Security Council itself,'' he said. The powerful 15-member council came in for stinging criticism because its main oil-for-food committee often ignored evidence of corruption, while some council members condoned oil smuggling to Iraq's neighbors. The report does not say why the corruption was overlooked but notes that Russia was one of the nations that long blocked efforts to probe the claims. Russian companies were heavily involved in oil-for-food and the country was a leading proponent of lifting the U.N. sanctions.
The report criticized the almost total lack of oversight of the program by the secretary-general and Deputy Secretary-General Louise Frechette, who was the direct boss of Benon Sevan, the program's executive director now being investigated for allegedly accepting kickbacks. It issued ``adverse findings'' against all three. ``No one seemed clearly in command,'' Volcker said, and the report gives meticulous accounts of Annan, Frechette and others dodging responsibility. Nonetheless, an outside review commissioned by the committee concluded that the oil-for-food program ``reversed a serious and deteriorating food crisis,'' thereby preventing hunger and deaths from malnutrition. The program also helped keep Saddam from obtaining weapons of mass destruction, the report said.
Lax oversight allowed Saddam's regime to pocket $1.8 billion in kickbacks in the awarding of contracts during the program's operation from 1997-2003, the committee said. The smuggling of Iraqi oil outside the oil-for-food program in violation of U.N. sanctions poured much more money - $8.4 billion - into Saddam's coffers during the same period, it said. Saddam also violated U.N. sanctions before the oil-for-food program started, illegally selling oil to Jordan, with the acquiescence of the United States and other Security Council members, and pocketing an additional $2.6 billion, the report said. ``This estimate of illicit incomes - $12.8 billion - sets out in quantitative terms the consequences of the United Nations' failure to properly oversee the program and maintain the integrity of the sanctions regime,'' the committee said. After Volcker addressed the council, the 15 members gave their preliminary reactions. Iraq's U.N. Ambassador Samir Sumaidaie, who was also invited to respond, said the Iraqi people ``for various reasons ... were robbed of a great deal of what was theirs by right.''
U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said ``the U.S. may or may not agree with all of the findings,'' but everyone can agree ``there was corruption both inside and outside the U.N. system.'' The most important thing now is to use the oil-for-food shortcomings ``as a catalyst for change,'' he said. ``This report unambiguously rejects the notion that business as usual at the United Nations is acceptable,'' Bolton said. ``We need to reform the U.N. in a manner that will prevent another oil-for-food scandal. The credibility of the United Nations depends on it.'' While the report focused primarily on management, it again addressed the most damaging allegations against Annan and reaffirmed previous findings of insufficient evidence that he knew about an oil-for-food contract awarded to a company which employed his son, Kojo. Neither was there any evidence to demonstration that he interfered in the contract won by the Swiss company, Cotecna. It reiterated that Annan did not sufficiently investigate conflicts of interest involving his son.
| ||||||
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | ||
Iraq tried to bribe former UN chief Boutros Ghali | ||
2005-09-08 | ||
![]()
Boutros-Ghali was in office in 1996 when the program was created that allowed Iraq to sell oil in order to buy food, medicine and offset the impact of 1990 UN sanctions. During negotiations to set up the program, âthe back channel discussions evolved into something more: an Iraqi scheme to bribe Secretary General Boutros Boutros Ghali in order to ensure that he would be flexible,â the report said. But the report said it had no evidence that Boutros Ghali was aware of Iraqâs intentions or received any money. The money was to have been passed through Iraqi American businessman, Samir Vincent, and Tongsun Park, a South Korean lobbyist. Both are accused by federal prosecutors of attempting to bribe UN officials.
| ||
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Yakovlev Pleads Guilty, Sevan Accused |
2005-08-08 |
One of the targets of the Oil-for-Food investigation, Alexander Yakovlev, on Monday pleaded guilty to conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering charges for taking bribes during his work at the United Nations. Yakovlev was stripped of his diplomatic immunity earlier Monday by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan (search) and taken into custody by federal authorities. David N. Kelley, the U.S. attorney for the southern district of New York, said that a judge accepted Yakovlev's guilty plea for his part in taking at least several hundred thousand dollars from foreign companies in connection with his job as a procurement officer at the United Nations from 1993 to 2005. The former U.N. official handled tens of millions of dollars worth of U.N. supply contracts annually when he worked there. Yakovlev was taken into custody hours after Paul Volcker (search), the man in charge of the independent investigation into Oil-for-Food (search), fingered the Russian native as one of two main U.N. officials involved in the program's corruption. Volcker's U.N.-approved panel, the Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC), released its latest report highlighting mismanagement of Oil-for-Food on Monday. It accused Yakovlev of of collecting nearly $1 million in kickbacks outside the Oil-for-Food (search) program. Yakovlev resigned from his job earlier this summer after a FOX News investigation. The Volcker report also accuses Benon Sevan, the one-time head of the Oil-for-Food program who severed his ties with the United Nations on Sunday, of taking kickbacks under the multi-billion dollar humanitarian operation aimed at easing the effects of sanctions on Iraqi civilians. Volcker, a former Federal Reserve chairman, also said in releasing the report that Sevan should also lose his diplomatic immunity so he can be prosecuted for alleged crimes. "All I can fairly say is that given the kind of evidence that we have presented, I would think there may well be interest in doing so," Volcker said, referring to Sevan and Yakovlev losing their immunity. The report, which Volcker said was intended to tie up some "loose ends" in his panel's investigation, touched on topics other than Sevan. It dealt briefly with Annan and his son, Kojo (search), and said more would be discussed in the committee's final report, expected in September. For the first time, the report gave a motive for Sevan's actions, saying his finances were "precarious" shortly before his alleged misdeeds. EFL Lot's of links at link to reports, etc. This is happening so quickly that the MSM may not even report it. At least that's what Kofi and Volker seem to be hoping. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | |||
Benon Sevan submits resignation, commences whingeing | |||
2005-08-08 | |||
![]()
Sevan blamed the secretary-general and his staff for not defending the program and making him a scapegoat. "I fully understand the pressure that you are under, and that there are those who are trying to destroy your reputation as well as my own, but sacrificing me for political expediency will never appease our critics or help you or the Organization," Sevan wrote. He said that the program, which supplied food and other goods to 27 million Iraqis, was often caught between conflicting mandates given by the U.N. Security Council, which supervised it, and national interests of those trying to do business with Iraq.
| |||
Link |
International-UN-NGOs | ||||
Sevan took kickbacks | ||||
2005-08-05 | ||||
Much gassing from defense attorney deleted![]()
As little as $160,000? Oh, well, let's just forget the whole thing then.
Click here to read Lewis' account of the "false allegations" against his client (pdf file). The committee, led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, refused to comment on Lewis' claims. Under the Oil-for-Food program, Saddam's regime could sell oil, provided the proceeds went to buy humanitarian goods or pay war reparations. Saddam's government decided on the goods it wanted, who should provide them and who could buy Iraqi oil. But the Security Council committee overseeing sanctions monitored the contracts. In a bid to curry favor and end sanctions, Saddam allegedly gave former government officials, activists, journalists and U.N. officials vouchers for Iraqi oil that could then be resold at a profit. According to Lewis, the committee will find that a small trading company called African Middle East Petroleum Co. Ltd. Inc. paid Sevan in exchange for his helping it win oil contracts from Saddam Hussein's regime. It will say that he acted "in concert" with a friend named Fred Nadler, who is the brother-in-law of former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Lewis said the letter of findings that Volcker's team sent to him does not spell how much he got in kickbacks. Volcker's team has been investigating Oil-for-Food for more than a year. In an interim report released in February, the committee concluded that Sevan solicited oil allocations from Saddam Hussein's regime on behalf of the company, known as AMEP, between 1998 and 2001. It said Nadler was essentially his middleman and accused Sevan of a "grave conflict of interest." In its report, Volcker's team mentioned $160,000 in "unexplained funds" belonging to Sevan. Sevan had disclosed the money earlier, saying it was from an aunt in Cyprus.
Under what conditions might he not be fired? If he blackmails Kofi? | ||||
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Was Former U.N. Official Wrongly Accused in Oil-for-Food Probe? |
2005-07-20 |
UNITED NATIONS â The secretive Volcker inquiry into the more than $110 billion United Nations Oil-for-Food scandal plans to issue a third interim report later this month â to tie up âloose endsâ from the previous two reports, as a committee spokesman recently put it. Having spent more than $30 million over the past year, the U.N.-authorized Independent Inquiry Committee has so far confirmed reports previously documented in the press that the man appointed by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan to run Oil-for-Food, his longtime colleague Benon Sevan, engaged in a conflict of interest in soliciting lucrative oil allocations from Saddam Husseinâs regime. Beyond that, however, the investigation headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker has offered up little more than the censure of a few third-tier U.N. officials, while allowing Annan to claim, without apparent basis in fact, âexonerationâ from a conflict of interest involving his son Kojo, who received money from a major Oil-for-Food contractor, Cotecna Inspection S.A.. Now, even the Volcker committeeâs wrap-up of loose ends may need more work. The latest question mark looms over the committeeâs âadverse findingsâ released five months ago against a retired U.N. official, Allan Robertson. Formerly the head of the U.N. procurement department, Robertson was censured by the Volcker inquiry this past February based on testimony that appears to have come from a tainted U.N. source. Robertson protested at the time that he was innocent. His claims were sharply dismissed by the Volcker inquiry, which declared it had âcompelling evidenceâ that while running the U.N. procurement department, Robertson had willfully violated U.N. procedures in 1996 to award an inspection contract to Saybolt Eastern Hemisphere B.V., a Dutch firm that monitored Saddam's oil exports from Iraq under the Oil-for-Food program. The problem here is that the Volcker committeeâs âcompelling evidenceâ came from Alexander Yakovlev, another longtime U.N. procurement official who handled tens of millions of dollars worth of U.N. supply contracts annually, and was portrayed as an advocate of integrity in the two Volcker interim reports that examined the awards of the Oil-for-Food inspection contracts. Yakovlev was the U.N. officer in charge of awarding both the Saybolt and Cotecna contracts, and the Volcker committee relied on his claims that in both cases, but particularly that of Saybolt, he had fought against the violation of U.N. rules. But Yakovlev, a Russian native, abruptly resigned from the United Nations late last month, after a FOX News investigation revealed that he was involved in an apparent conflict of interest with a regular U.N. supplier, IHC Services Inc., which had hired Yakovlevâs son Dmitry between 2000 and 2003, according to Dmitryâs own resume. Yakovlev left the United Nations the day after the world body announced its own inquiry into his activities, and the Volcker committee then took charge, sealing his office to all but its own investigators. A day later, the executive director of the Volcker investigation, Reid Morden, told the New York Times that the committee, on unrelated grounds, had been harboring its own suspicions about Yakovlevâs âveracity.â None of those suspicions, however, are evident in the two Volcker reports released to date. In the first of those documents, issued Feb. 3, Yakovlevâs testimony served in part to condemn another U.N. official, Joseph Stephanides â who was fired four months later by Kofi Annan on the basis of Volckerâs findings. Stephanides says he is innocent, a claim backed by a wide array of Western diplomats and by the U.N. staff union, and he is appealing his firing. In the same report, the committee briskly dismissed Robertsonâs claim that some of the evidence against him had likely been trumped up by Yakovlev. Robertson was not even sent a copy of the report. None of this was corrected, or even addressed, in the second Volcker report, released March 29. Robertsonâs claims of innocence simply slipped from view. He had retired from the United Nations in 1998. There was nothing for Robertson to appeal, except the loss of his good name. But a closer look at Robertsonâs case reveals a great deal about the Volcker committeeâs peremptory methods in fingering some lower-level U.N. staffers, while providing far gentler handling to top officials -- including Annan and Iqbal Riza, Annanâs then chief of staff. Riza abruptly left the post in January, after investigators discovered that he had shredded three yearsâ worth of Oil-for-Food documents, which he claimed were only duplicate records. But he was retained by Annan as a special advisor and has since been appointed to a new, high-level U.N. position dealing with âworld peace." By contrast, both Robertson and Stephanides describe a kangaroo-court process, in which they say they were allowed no reasonable chance to defend themselves. Told abruptly just a few days before the release of the damning report that they were about to be charged with âadverse findings,â they were allowed to view evidence only under close supervision in the Volcker committeeâs offices, and given less than a week to prepare written rebuttals before the report was released. Both the accused officials say the Volcker committee then published its report only a day after they had submitted their defenses. âIt was obvious to me that they had made up their minds,â Robertson told FOX News. In Robertsonâs case, the committee relied heavily on documents written by Yakovlev and found by investigators in U.N. procurement office files. These documents, referred to in U.N. jargon as ânotes to file,â were memoranda of the sort that U.N. staffers can place in official records to note their objections to actions taken over their protest. U.N. procedures require that such memoranda be copied to any U.N. officials involved in the decision at the same time that they are placed in the permanent files. In Robertsonâs case, the Volcker committee cited two such memoranda from Yakovlev, dated July 22 and July 25, 1996, which claimed, in effect, that Robertson â then head of Yakovlevâs department â was bending the rules and overlooking a lower-priced bid from another firm in order to give the Iraq oil inspection contract to Saybolt. The first of the memos, Yakovlev also testified to the committee, summarized a meeting between Yakovlev and Robertson where Yakovlev made the same objections face-to-face. Robertson says the face-to-face meeting Yakovlev summarized in the ânote to fileâ never took place. Nor, says Robertson, had he ever seen the damning ânotes to fileâ themselves until the Volcker committee confronted him with them this past February â as Robertson says he also told Volcker investigator, Susan Ringler. Robertson protested at the time that Yakovlevâs notes appeared âself-serving,â and pointed out that if they were generated back in 1996, when the contracts were awarded, then both he and at least one other U.N. official in the chain of command should have received copies. FOX News has since learned that this other U.N. official also does not recollect having received copies of Yakovlevâs ânotes to file.â The Volcker committee, in its report, judged that âMr. Robertsonâs efforts to attack the credibility of Mr. Yakovlev are as unsupported as they are unconvincing.â The committee had no further comment about Robertson and Yakovlev when reached by FOX News. In a series of in-depth interviews about his treatment during the Volcker investigation, Robertson said, âI feel I was probably a soft target,â because he had been retired from the U.N. for years by the time Volcker started his investigation. âI have been treated unfairly," Robertson declared, âand if this is how they approach people like me, what kind of reporting or investigation is really involved on their part?â George Russell is Executive Editor of FOX News. Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
Oil-for-Food Paper Shredder Still Shredding |
2005-07-15 |
UNITED NATIONS â The man who abruptly retired as Kofi Annan's cabinet chief after shredding papers related to the Oil-for-Food program has been shredding still more documents at the United Nations, an eyewitness told FOX News. Iqbal Riza, who has been working on a $1-a-year salary as a special advisor to Annan, has been shredding large quantities of unknown documents in his new 10th-floor U.N. office across the street from the U.N. Secretariat building, the source said. According to the eyewitness, a U.N. staffer who works on the same floor as Riza, the retired cabinet chief arrived within days of leaving his old job, loaded down with many cartons of papers and files. Riza was not in his new office daily, but every day he appeared, he would put large numbers of material through an office shredder located in a public area. "It became the office joke," said the eyewitness, who did not wish to be identified for fear of Annan's office would neither confirm nor deny the fresh round of destruction. A spokesman for the secretary-general told FOX News that Riza was now working as a special adviser on a newly launched project to foster dialogue between the Islamic and Western worlds. "As part of his work on the Alliance of Civilizations ... he may have had to routinely destroy documents related to that project," the spokesman said. The spokesman said that all material previously in Riza's possession related to Oil-for-Food remained in Annan's office. Riza has not returned calls to FOX News for comment. A U.N. spokesman said he was out of the country. Before becoming Annan's top aide, Riza was a Pakistani diplomat who had worked at the United Nations for more than 25 years. On Dec. 22, Annan announced that Riza would be retiring from his position effective Jan. 15. Annan said he agreed to Riza's departure "with very mixed emotions," saying "he ... has always provided me with wise and trusted counsel." One fact undisclosed at the time of Annan's announcement was that it came on the same day Riza admitted to investigators with the Independent Inquiry Committee into the Oil-for-Food program that he had destroyed documents related to the program. Two days before, when first interviewed by investigators for IIC Chairman Paul Volcker, he did not tell them that he approved the destruction of three years worth of documents. But when he did admit to shredding documents, he described them as being duplicates â a point the IIC would eventually dispute in a March 29 report. "The committee does not find persuasive Mr. Riza's suggestion that his 'chron' files [chronological records] were only duplicates of files maintained elsewhere at the United Nations," the IIC report states. Volcker's panel was commissioned by Annan to Among those accused of asking Saddam's regime for vouchers worth millions is Benon Sevan, hand-picked by Annan to run the entire Oil-for-Food program. Oh, Mike! |
Link |