Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
The US-Ukraine Fossil Deal: Bondage and Conflict with China |
2025-05-02 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Andrey Khrustalev [REGNUM] On the eve of May Day, Ukraine finally signed a mining agreement with the United States. This happened on Wednesday evening, just before Walpurgis Night, when, according to medieval tradition, witches gathered for the Sabbath. The text of the document has not yet been published, but some of the outlines of the agreements can already be traced. The Minister of Economy of Ukraine Yulia Svyrydenko, who reported the event, published a brief summary of what was signed. On paper, or more precisely, on social networks, where the post appeared, everything looks quite decent. “The document is now such that it can ensure success for both of our countries – Ukraine and the United States,” the minister wrote. So why was Ukraine reluctant to sign the document? After all, when Sviridenko's plane headed to Washington, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's team told her she had to be ready to sign all the agreements or go home, three people familiar with the matter said, the Financial Times reports. And it all happened after the US reportedly dropped conditions related to Ukraine repaying debts for previous military and financial aid. “Today we reached an agreement under which, theoretically, we get much more than $350 billion,” US President Donald Trump wrote in this regard. And unblocked commercial supplies of weapons for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. What was the struggle for so long under the carpet, and what were Ukrainian officials trying to bargain for? PROS AND CONS The main advantage for Kyiv is that the agreement does not contain any mention of any debt obligations of Ukraine to the United States, something Trump had previously insisted on. The main drawback is that no one in Ukraine or the United States has reported on the security guarantees for Ukraine attached to the agreement, which Zelensky had previously insisted on. The document has not yet been published, but its contents have been posted by “Sorosenok” Yaroslav Zheleznyak, a people’s deputy from the “Voice” party, who (according to him) has sources somewhere in the State Department, and what Minister Sviridenko and Prime Minister Denys Shmygal have published on social networks. The deal includes an agreement to establish the U.S.-Ukraine Recovery Investment Fund. The parties will jointly manage the Fund, with a 50/50 shareholding. "Neither side will prevail, and this will reflect an equal partnership between Ukraine and the United States," the minister writes. The first is represented by the state Agency for the Support of Public-Private Partnerships, the second by the International Development Finance Corporation, and together they must work to restore what has been destroyed through investments in natural resources (mining, energy) and infrastructure. And here the questions immediately begin. The project financing scheme looks like this. Ukraine undertakes to send half (50%) of royalties and other license payments from new licenses for natural resources (oil, gas, metals, etc.) from a special fund in the budget to the fund. And the senior partner makes a "financial contribution, which can be additionally increased thanks to military assistance provided by the United States to Ukraine." In practice, it may look like this: the Americans supply several Patriot air defense systems on a commercial basis, each worth $1 billion. All of this is counted toward the Fund, which must compensate the Ukrainian side for this amount with new licenses for the extraction of minerals. For example, the US will supply Ukraine with five obsolete MIM-104 Patriot air defense systems, which Israel refused in May last year and which Ukraine wanted to receive. And Ukraine, on the basis of a shared participation, must issue licenses for the same amount - that is, put up for sale licenses for the development of minerals for $5 billion. At the same time, the licenses must be put up for sale at a price for which they will actually be wanted in the conditions of increased risk in the form of war and corruption that has not gone away. So the amount will be determined by the Fund's management, also made up of half representatives of the USA and Ukraine. And here there is no doubt whose vote will be decisive. The management of the processes “in the fields” is entrusted to the DFC company, but more about it later. This money goes to the budget of Ukraine, and from there half is transferred to the newly created Fund. "Ukraine contributes 50% of the state budget revenues from the new rent for new licenses for new sites," Sviridenko notes, emphasizing the word "new," and then explains that the funds are invested in projects for the extraction of minerals, oil, and gas, as well as in related infrastructure or processing. What to invest in - Ukraine and the United States will again decide together. It sounds attractive, if not for one “but”. Investing is only possible in Ukraine, but the provisions are only about investments, not about income or new receipts. As you can see, the agreement does not mention them. Officials express the hope that the income and receipts of the fund will not be distributed for the first 10 years, and this is probably where one of the document's quirks may be hidden. The difference between expectations and reality is why Kyiv did not want to sign the documents. WALL AGAINST CHINA Trump is clearly set on making a profit on the principle of "here and now", so the income and contributions of the Fund are not taxed either in the USA or in Ukraine. It looks like a prelude to the creation of a new virtual offshore, funds from which can be withdrawn without taxes and control - from any side, and without control and restrictions. Moreover, the Fund (the American side) receives priority rights to buy products extracted on the territory of Ukraine (for example, natural gas, rare metals, oil). And the "owners" undertake to ensure that third countries or companies do not receive more favorable conditions. Which, as MP Zheleznyak explains, "will significantly limit Ukraine's ability to choose the most favorable commercial conditions and partners." At the same time, the Ukrainian side, which will lose budget revenues for many years, is obliged to compensate for all losses from exchange rate fluctuations and losses from converting the hryvnia into dollars. And the priority of the agreement over local legislation limits the right of the "sovereign state" to independently regulate laws in the sphere of investments and natural resources. Obviously, this was also a stumbling block for her, since a partnership of this kind (and the agreement is indefinite) obviously quotes the 500-hryvnia banknote: “Unequal equality for all.” Trump reiterated that the deal would allow Americans to return some of the aid they provided to Ukraine. "We invested $350 billion or so there, while Europe only invested $100 billion. So we have to somehow get some of our investment back. I felt stupid. So I went to them (the Ukrainian authorities. - Ed.) and said: look, we need to get access to rare earth elements. They have excellent rare earth resources - these are certain minerals, materials that are not available everywhere. This is their big asset. And today we made a deal where, theoretically, we will get much more than this 350 billion. I just wanted to protect our interests. I didn’t want to be put in a stupid position again,” said the American president, who is openly “cheating” Zelensky with his continued whining about “solid security guarantees.” According to Trump, the very presence of Americans within the framework of the concluded deal is a firm guarantee. "No one will encroach." By signing the deal with his approval ratings slumping 100 days into his presidency, he secured the victory he needed. And that victory must come with actual profits. US GDP contracted by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, the largest quarterly contraction since 2022, meaning the sooner the money arrives, the better. And perhaps that was the reason for his phrase that “Zelensky was three weeks late signing it.” And now, the promised details about the DFC agency. As Minister Sviridenko informs us, the Fund is supported by the US government through this office, which “will help us attract investments and technologies from funds and companies both in the US and in the EU and other countries.” However, it is worth knowing that the US International Development Finance Corporation, also known as the US Development Finance Corporation, is a federal agency that has the same status as USAID and USIP, which were recently dissolved by Trump. The difference is that it was created with bipartisan support from Congress during the first Trump administration to provide private sector financing for development projects in low- and middle-income countries. The agency was intended to be a system for proposing alternative projects to China's "New Silk Belt and Road" infrastructure initiatives. Its first head was Adam Boehler, a close ally of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, but he left the post in January 2021. Agency officials say its mandate to link private investment with government loans is critical to U.S. efforts to compete with China, Politico reports. The DFC has played a key role in securing hundreds of millions of dollars in loan assistance for a U.S.-led effort to build a trans-African rail system that would bring critical mineral resources from central Africa to Atlantic ports. The project, known as the Lobito Corridor, is seen as a major competitor to Beijing’s projects in the continent. The presence or even the main role of the DFC in Ukraine could lead to a deep confrontation between Beijing and Kyiv, the consequences of which for Ukraine could be disastrous. In recent years, China has become the country's main trading partner, but with the start of the agency's activities, the situation could change dramatically, and Kyiv will find itself at the forefront of the fight against the Chinese presence in the region. All this looks more like forecasts for now, which can be clarified only after the official publication of the main documents. And in the case of China - after the first actions of the DFC. In the meantime, Henry Kissinger’s words come to mind again : “To be America’s enemy is dangerous, to be America’s friend is fatal.” Especially when starting projects on the eve of Walpurgis Night. |
Link |
Southeast Asia |
Fifty Years After Saigon: Remembering the Nobility of a Betrayed Cause |
2025-05-01 |
The tragedy was simply breathtaking. And horribly, horribly unnecessary. What followed was not peace, but darkness. The swift collapse of South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos (turns out the Domino Theory was true) brought the subjugation of millions, and the opening act of a Communist bloodbath across Southeast Asia. At least a million were sent to the "re-education camps" in Vietnam alone. Half a million were murdered. Another two million fled this brutal night by sea, on rafts wholly unsuited for the tumultuous ocean, in wild hope that an American aircraft carrier might happen upon them. Close to half a million died in the water. I remember standing before one of the refugees, one of the countless "boat people" who was resettled to Fort Smith, Arkansas. He was a slight, middle-aged man, with thinning hair and humble dignity. We were in the fellowship hall of my church. I was eight years old. And I remember looking up at the South Vietnamese flag on his lapel and just weeping, and saying over and over "I’m sorry, I’m just so sorry." We should all be so sorry None of that counts the genocide of Pol Pot — whom the American left had dubbed "the George Washington of Cambodia". Over the next three years he murdered between a quarter and a third of his entire population. He would have gone right on had not even the Communists in Moscow and Hanoi been horrified (though Beijing gave him their unqualified support both before and after the massacre). None of this had to happen. This was not the end of a war, but the culmination of betrayal — a betrayal of an ally, of a cause, and of the very principles America had defended with precious blood and treasure for eight long years. The received wisdom is that Vietnam was a mistake, a misguided war fought in the wrong place at the wrong time. That narrative is false. The Vietnam War was part of a noble, epic struggle — the same struggle that won the Cold War and saved the whole world from a similar fate. It was a just effort to stop Communist totalitarianism and genocide from consuming yet another corner of the globe. South Vietnam was not a hopeless case. It was a fledgling republic, striving to build a free society in the shadow of Marxist tyranny and under constant assault from within and without. Its people fought with courage and resolve for more than two decades, first with our help and then — fatally — with almost none. In many ways, the fall of Vietnam mirrored the loss of China in 1949: a long American effort thrown away at the very last through perfidy in Washington — begun and betrayed by Democrats in both cases — with ghastly, ongoing consequences. The two were even similar in this: a Christian President of China (Chiang Kai-shek) betrayed by Truman, a Christian President of South Vietnam (Ngo Dinh Diem) assassinated on orders from JFK, after both of which came the deluge. By 1973, we had won. No, really. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords, forcing North Vietnam to accept South Vietnam’s sovereignty and halting hostilities. The terms included an ironclad U.S. guarantee not only to supply and train the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) but to bomb North Vietnam into the Stone Age if it transgressed the treaty. The Communists agreed to this. They also agreed that no Soviet arms would replace those lost during the war, on penalty of Nixon’s aerial wrath. American troops came home with honor, leaving behind an allied nation capable of defending itself, provided it received the continued support we’d promised. That support was a central condition of the peace. Nixon called it "peace with honor" because it represented more than withdrawal — it was a commitment, a guarantee that America would not desert its friends or allow 58,000 of its sons to have died in vain. But with Nixon forced from office, Congress fell into the hands of men more concerned with leftist politics than principle. Nixon won 49 states in 1972. In the aftermath of Watergate, in 1974, Democrats won overwhelming Congressional majorities: almost 300 House seats, and a filibuster-proof 61 in the Senate. This radicalized majority, driven by post-Watergate bloodlust, slashed military aid to South Vietnam by over 75%, prohibited any American military response to a massive Soviet rearmament of the North, and watched coldly as North Vietnam violated every term of the accords. They wouldn’t even send our allies tires for their Jeeps or gas for their tanks. Deprived of ammunition, fuel, and the will of its ally, South Vietnam collapsed — not because it lacked heart, but because it was abandoned, by the same Democrat Party that had sent America’s sons to die there just ten years before. RTWT. I did get a Cambodian Brother-in-Law, whose dad was killed by the Rouge for being a teacher |
Link |
Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
Why Arab Countries Do Not Want Gazans |
2025-03-02 |
[AmericanThinker] For decades, Arab nations have positioned themselves as staunch supporters of the Palestinian cause, yet their actions suggest otherwise. Although they publicly denounce Israel and advocate for Palestinian rights, behind closed doors, many Arab leaders have systematically worked to prevent a permanent resolution to the Palestinian issue. Nowhere is this hypocrisy more evident than in the refusal of most Arab states — particularly Jordan — to integrate Palestinians, despite historical, demographic, and geopolitical realities that make Jordan the most viable Palestinian homeland. Jordan is historically part of Palestine, with the majority of its population being Palestinian. Given these facts, Jordan should logically serve as the natural homeland for displaced Palestinians rather than advocating for a separate Palestinian state in the West Bank or Gaza. However, the Hashemite monarchy, which has ruled Jordan since its creation as a British protectorate, actively disenfranchises Palestinian Jordanians, maintaining them in a second-class status while simultaneously portraying itself as a champion of Palestinian rights. Western policymakers often justify Jordan’s treatment of Palestinians by referencing the events of 1970, when King Hussein used the Pakistani army to crush an attempted PLO takeover. However, declassified White House documents suggest a different perspective. Then—U.S. secretary of State Henry Kissinger viewed the idea of Palestinian self-rule in Jordan as the chance for a solution to the Palestinian question. In a White House memo to President Nixon, Kissinger argued that a Palestinian-led government in Jordan could provide "a Palestinian settlement." Nixon did not support the concept. This allowed King Hussein to enlist the support of Pakistan, which sent troops to Jordan and swiftly suppressed the Palestinians, killing thousands of civilians. With that, the prospect of a Palestinian state in Jordan was extinguished, paving the way for decades of failed peace initiatives based on the so-called two-state solution. Fast-forward to today, and Jordan’s King Abdullah himself is in an alliance with Iran — yes, Iran. Unlike other Arab leaders who maintain a distance from Tehran, Abdullah has openly courted the Iranian regime, even going so far as to feature a photograph with Iran’s supreme leader in his memoir Our Last Best Chance. This relationship has been extensively documented, including by Israeli journalist Edy Cohen, who wrote in The Jerusalem Post, "It’s official: Jordan is now allies with Iran." Beyond Iran, Abdullah has also strengthened economic ties with China, Iran’s primary military and political backer. Instead of accepting discounted Israeli liquid natural gas, he chose to take a significant loan from China to build a power station, which trapped Jordan in billions of dollars of debt to China. Also, Abduallah is in full alliance with the radical Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan, which he uses for leverage against the disgruntled Palestinian majority. Simply put, whenever the oppressed Palestinian majority requests basic civil rights, the Jordanian Bedouin-dominated Muslim Brotherhood group launches demonstrations requesting "the right of return to Palestine" to remind Jordan’s Palestinians that "they are mere refugees in Jordan despite being citizens" and hence "should have no rights here." This may explain why Abduallah, like most Arab rulers, is keen to sustain the Palestinian issue rather than resolve it. By keeping Palestinians in a stateless limbo, Abdullah and other Arab leaders maintain a useful political tool for extracting foreign aid and exerting leverage over the West. The manipulation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not unique to Jordan. With the exception of Saudi Arabia, nearly every Arab state has benefited from prolonging the conflict. The Palestinian issue has become a convenient pretext for securing foreign aid, suppressing internal dissent, and leveraging influence in Washington. Though publicly condemning Israel, many of these regimes have secretly collaborated with Israel on security matters while ensuring that Palestinians remain in permanent refugee status to serve as a bargaining chip. Israel have absorbed Jewish refugees from Arab World. Arabs, having 1000 times larger territory and 100 times more resources choose to put Arab refugees from the war they've started in camps and (with a lot of international assistance) make them a weapon against Israel. And then they complain that "Palestinians" are a destabilizing factor! |
Link |
Government Corruption |
20 Ohio Counties Launch Investigations into Piles of Phony Voter Registrations |
2025-02-27 |
[THEGATEWAYPUNDIT] In August 2024, The Gateway Pundit's Patty McMurray first reported on a Democrat-funded voter registration group accused of turning in hundreds of suspected fraudulent voter registrations—this time in Ohio! ** You can read the full TGP August report here.** The Gateway Pundit discovered that a group called Black Fork Strategies, which operates across the state of Ohio, was being investigated by the Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose over another alleged fraudulent voter registration campaign. On their website, Black Fork Strategies brags about registering a stunning 125,000 voters in Ohio since 2018. The Hamilton County Board of Elections has turned over several suspicious voter registration applications Ohio Secretary of State's Public Integrity Division. According to Hamilton County Board of Elections members, the voter registrations in question were recently turned in by the self-described ''progressive'' voter registration organization Black Fork Strategies. Hamilton County Director of Elections Sherry Poland discusses three issues she identified with voter registrations tied to Black Fork Strategies, which she claims is running voter registration drives throughout the state of Ohio. In one example, Ms. Poland explained how they received a voter registration from Black Fork Strategies, and the name of the registrant was 'Henry Kissinger.' ''We did do a match, the voter registration database as compared to the DMV database, and it was a mismatch on every item listed, any identifying information listed on this registration form. So we again asked Black Fork Strategies for the canvasser who submitted this registration form, and that is on your summary sheet.'' Next, Sherry Poland held up a large stack of voter registrations about an inch thick to show how many registrations one canvasser from Black Fork Strategies turned in with that all appeared to have the same handwriting. ''Lastly, we've received a number of registrations, and there's a table copy for each of you. The stack of registration forms appears to have the same handwriting. And they were all submitted by the same canvasser, who is, again, the contact information listed on your summary.'' Ms. Poland explained that they've reached out to the Southwest regional field director for Black Fork Strategies, telling her fellow board members, ''When we first noticed these suspicious registrations, we asked her to come to the office. Democrat BOE member Joseph Mallory added, ''I've heard of other counties in the state having to deal with suspicious registrations. I think we should refer the matter to the Secretary of State's Public Integrity Office for further investigation.'' Related: Hamilton County Board of Elections: 2024-11-04 Shady Election Group Dumps 90,000 Ballot Registrations in Maricopa County Before Sign-Up Deadline Ends – At Least 40,000 Damaged, Thousands Incomplete Hamilton County Board of Elections: 2013-03-12 Nun resigns after vote fraud accusation Hamilton County Board of Elections: 2012-11-04 'Hitler' appears on Ohio voter registration form |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
World's most secretive society appoints new leader as second Trump presidency sparks seismic shift |
2024-12-27 |
![]() The society, which consists of leaders in politics, industry, academia and the military, has selected former NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg to chair its 'steering committee.' Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg group has long drawn fascination for its clandestine meetings at exclusive hotels and alpine resorts where attendees hold discussions on international relations, economics and security. Heads of the CIA and MI6 have been among its members, while Henry Kissinger was a regular alongside the likes of Bill Clinton, Bill Gates and then-Prince Charles. Now a major power shift is afoot as Stoltenberg, who attended his first Bilderberg summit in 2002, has been tapped for his expertise in transatlantic strategy. It comes as Trump, whose frequent attacks on NATO have sparked outrage in Europe, ascends once more to the Oval Office. The president-elect has been adamant that he will no longer spend billions in US taxpayer money to fund other countries' wars. Stoltenberg's tenure at NATO was dominated by the Russia-Ukraine conflict and he proudly claimed to have overseen 'the largest reinforcement of our collective defense in a generation.' Many of his Bilderberg colleagues have benefited from this increased defense spending. Among them is Trump insider Peter Thiel, boss of AI giant Palantir, whose technology has been used by Ukraine in the fight against Putin. Stoltenberg last month warned that Trump's 'campaign rhetoric had raised legitimate concerns about his commitment to European security.' But the new Bilderberg boss can rest assured that if things get sticky, he now has a direct line to Trump in the form of Thiel, who has been one of the president-elect's biggest backers. Another notable member of the Bilderberg steering committee is Nadia Schadlow, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a DC think-tank. In October, Schadlow wrote a piece titled 'Europe Should Not See a Potential Trump Return as a Threat.' In the piece, she addressed how Trump often attacks European NATO member countries for not appropriating enough of their money to national defense but said that Europe should try to work with him. 'Instead of framing him as destroyer of an old order, Europe should consider how Mr Trump's disruptive nature might help to position Europe for a better future,' she wrote. Stoltenberg may seek to harness the media to help shift the Bilderberg Group's strategy. The secretive society tends to avoid any interaction with the press and keeps the details of its meetings secret. But Stoltenberg is no stranger to dealing with the media and among the new members are Silicon Valley billionaires like Thiel who are more at ease with public speaking. Stoltenberg will co-chair the steering committee alongside Canadian-American economist, philanthropist, Marie-Josée Kravis who sits on the board of Publicis, one of the world's largest PR and communications companies. Kravis is married to the billionaire Henry Kravis, founder of legendary investment firm KKR. A true sense of the Bilderberg's new tack could become apparent at its next annual meeting which will be in Sweden, appropriately the homeland of its new head Stoltenberg. As for Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies has built a reputation as both a visionary entrepreneur and a polarizing figure in politics. A staunch supporter of Donald Trump, Thiel's influence has steadily grown within Bilderberg, a group that convenes heads of state, corporate executives, and policymakers for off-the-record discussions on global challenges. His proximity to Trump allies, including Vice President-elect J.D. Vance, a former employee of Thiel's Mithril Capital, places him in a unique position as Bilderberg recalibrates for Trump's 'America First' agenda. Thiel's involvement with Palantir Technologies, a leading AI and data analytics firm, underscores his significance in global geopolitics. Palantir's role in military targeting and surveillance has been pivotal in conflicts including the current Russia-Ukraine war. CEO Alex Karp, who also sits on the Bilderberg steering committee, recently highlighted Palantir's impact, stating the company was 'responsible for most of the targeting in Ukraine.' This direct link to modern warfare exemplifies how Thiel's tech empire aligns with Bilderberg's interests in security and military investment. This cabal of the global, largely liberal, elite — with strong ties to the EU — meets every year amid a cloak of secrecy, but Stoltenberg's appointment as co-chair also reflects the group's strategic realignment amid rising geopolitical tensions. Having overseen NATO's largest defense reinforcement in a generation, Stoltenberg is no stranger to Bilderberg, participating in meetings since 2002. His tenure as NATO chief was dominated by the Russia-Ukraine conflict and increasing NATO expansion, making him a natural choice to steer Bilderberg's discussions on transatlantic defense. Meanwhile, Thiel's growing influence at Bilderberg also signals a convergence of tech innovation and military strategy. His robotics company, Anduril, and Palantir have both capitalized on the global arms race, reflecting the group's longstanding ties to defense and intelligence. Thiel's ideological alignment with Trump and his tech-driven contributions to defense provide a modern reflection of Bilderberg's founding ethos - melding elite influence with geopolitical strategy. Stoltenberg's leadership, coupled with Thiel's outsized influence, points to a Bilderberg Group increasingly intertwined with military innovation and political strategy. As the group prepares for its next meeting in Stockholm, hosted by billionaire industrialist Marcus Wallenberg, the focus will likely center on defense spending and transatlantic cooperation in an era of renewed great-power competition. So clandestine are the Bilderberg gatherings that no minutes are taken, no press conferences given and no reports published. The conference operates under 'Chatham House Rules', which means participants can use and report information exchanged there, but not disclose the source. The Bilderberg Group — so called because it first met in 1954 at the Hotel Bilderberg in the Netherlands — is made up of at least 120 self-proclaimed 'leading citizens' of Europe and the U.S., who meet annually to discuss 'issues of common interest'. Every summer, figureheads from politics, business, academia, finance and defense lock themselves away in a closely guarded hotel for three days to discuss topics of vital global significance about which the rest of us can only speculate. Related: Bilderberg: 2024-07-12 Pakistan to clinch new IMF bailout deal this month: FinMin Aurangzeb Bilderberg: 2024-06-17 Kaja Kallas, the Estonian PM in the running for EU foreign policy chief Bilderberg: 2024-06-12 Carville: Biden Should Not Have Run for Re-Election Related: Jens Stoltenberg 09/20/2024 Johnson calls for Ukraine to join NATO without waiting for the conflict to end Jens Stoltenberg 09/06/2024 Ukrainian perspective: Operation in Kursk region Jens Stoltenberg 09/01/2024 Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: August 31, 2024 Related: Peter Thiel 10/08/2024 A controversial police tool has been quietly used in more than 1,000 U.S. investigations, leading to arrests without suspects knowing how they were identified. Peter Thiel 01/11/2024 US elections could trigger the collapse of the global liberal system Peter Thiel 08/30/2023 Continuation of Epstein's list |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Armageddon is postponed. How the Americans were prevented from winning the nuclear war |
2024-11-18 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Oleg Shevchenko [REGNUM] Exactly 55 years ago, on November 17, 1969, negotiations between the USSR and the USA began in Helsinki to limit nuclear arsenals. Representatives of all the world's media that had any presence in the information resources market rushed to the capital of Finland. An event of incredible significance! The USSR and the USA decide to come to an agreement, Armageddon is postponed! For the average person, this event happened suddenly, but in the world of big politics and big military strategy, there is no place for the word "suddenly". And the main issues were not decided in front of cameras in Helsinki, but "behind the curtain". ![]() More precisely, in a series of closed bilateral meetings between the veterans of the diplomacy of that time: US presidential aide Henry Kissinger and Soviet ambassador to the US Anatoly Dobrynin. And it all took its final form only in November 1974 in Vladivostok during a meeting between Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and US President Gerald Ford. AGENT X REPORTS It all began in the distant, victorious year for our country - May 18, 1945. From the USSR Embassy in Great Britain came a cipher using the most powerful encryption capabilities, it had the stamp "Super Lightning". That is, the information contained in it was not only extremely secret, but it was required to be reported to the leadership as soon as possible. They were obtained by an agent with the code letter "X", whose identity is still one of the main secrets of our intelligence services. He reported that three days ago the Joint Planning Headquarters of the British War Cabinet began developing a scenario for war against the USSR - the Unthinkable plan. The scenario – the authenticity of which the British government denied until 1998 – included plans for an offensive by 47 Anglo-American divisions in East Germany and Poland. The British also intended to use 12 undisbanded Wehrmacht divisions that the Allies were “keeping in reserve” in Schleswig-Holstein and southern Denmark. Even then, the West's plans did not assume that the war would be "conventional" (without the use of weapons of mass destruction). Let us recall that the first atomic bomb was tested at the Alamogordo test site in New Mexico in July 1945, and a month later, the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki became victims of the new weapon. In 2014, London's The Daily Mail published FBI archive data, which showed that in 1947, Churchill convinced the Harry Truman administration of the need to launch a preemptive nuclear strike against the USSR. "DESIRABLE LOSSES OF RUSSIANS" - UP TO 100 MILLION PEOPLE But the Americans themselves were developing various options for attacking the Soviet Union. Here are just a few of them. In September 1945, American Major General Loris Norstad developed a map of targets for American nuclear bombing of the Soviet Union. The general planned to drop from 123 to 466 nuclear warheads on peaceful cities: Moscow, Baku, Novosibirsk, Gorky, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Omsk, Kuibyshev, Kazan, Saratov, Molotov (Perm), Magnitogorsk. On December 14, 1945, the Peancer plan was born. It designated 20 major cities and industrial centers of the USSR for atomic bombing, on which it was supposed to drop 196 atomic bombs. This plan was followed by a number of others with no less menacing names: "Hot Day", "Incinerating Heat", "Shake", etc. In 1946, Dwight Eisenhower, then the US Army Chief of Staff, developed the Totality plan, which called for dropping 20-30 atomic bombs on two dozen Soviet cities. On December 19, 1949, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff officially approved the basic plan for waging nuclear war, Dropshot. According to this plan, it was necessary to drop 300 nuclear bombs on the USSR in such a way that 85 percent of the industrial potential of the Soviet Union would be destroyed in one blow. At the same time, the “desirable losses” of USSR citizens were estimated at 60-100 million people. Against this warlike background, the Americans begin diplomatic pressure. In a very brazen manner, reveling in its own monopoly on nuclear weapons, Washington proposed the " Baruch Plan " - named after its developer, Roosevelt's advisor, financier Bernard Baruch. According to the plan, actual control over the nuclear industry and nuclear arsenals that other countries might acquire would be transferred to the United States through the creation of a supposedly international special commission in which the West would occupy a dominant position. PEACE PROPOSALS PLUS "KUZKINA MOTHER" In response, on June 19, 1946, Moscow put forward a draft international convention on the complete and unconditional prohibition of the production and use of atomic weapons to the UN Atomic Commission. The project was based on the recognition of the principle of equality and equal security for all signatory states. As expected, the Americans began to block Moscow's proposal and put pressure on various countries in every possible way to accept their plan. But the Soviet Union soon had a weighty argument. In 1949, the USSR tests its first atomic bomb. It becomes obvious to Washington that nuclear blackmail can no longer be used: Moscow has something to respond to the plans of NATO generals. And although the ratio of nuclear bombs was in favor of the Americans (1950 - 299 for the USA versus five for the USSR; 1955 - 2422 versus 200), no one in Washington wanted to have a nuclear explosion in New York or Los Angeles. This was the moment when it would have been possible to come to peace talks. But the US relied on its scientific and technological advantage and began a new round of atomic blackmail. It was called "Bombing Breakaway". The goal was to dominate the speed and scale of air delivery of bombs against the USSR and destroy its nuclear potential at their bases with a surprise preemptive strike. By 1960, over 18,000 nuclear warheads and over two thousand carrier aircraft had been accumulated. The USSR could counter them with only 1,600 atomic bombs. Soviet successes in near-Earth space, from the launch of Sputnik to the flight of Yuri Gagarin, convinced the Americans that the military component of our missile program was up to par. As early as 1959, Pentagon chief Neil McElroy announced that the Soviets were capable of creating large forces of intercontinental ballistic missiles in a short time, while the United States was critically lagging behind in this regard. With this statement, the United States launched a new round of nuclear confrontation in the sphere of missile technologies, which led to the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. After it, it became clear to many: the USSR would not give in to blackmail, and its scientific and technical base was not much inferior to the American one. The situation was becoming a stalemate. This was stated in 1957 by then Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in his book War or Peace?: “The ability of the United States to drop atomic bombs on Russia is largely neutralized by the ability of the latter to drop atomic bombs on the United States and Western Europe.” Even the creation of a super-powerful thermonuclear bomb by the US in the mid-1950s did not improve their situation, because the USSR responded with a hydrogen bomb – a weapon of geostrategic scale. In those same years, the US Secretary of Aviation Thomas Finletter claimed: “ The security of our country is affected, which was not the case with the advent of the atomic bomb… In a short time, the Russians will have enough hydrogen bombs to be able to destroy the United States with a small part of them.” THE MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM LOOKS LIKE WET CARDBOARD The next stage of the US asymmetric response was to be missile charges with multiple warheads and the first Sentinel missile defense systems, which had been developed since the late 1960s. But at the same time, American military-technical analysts were sounding the alarm. The presence of a heavy missile system with a nuclear charge in the USSR, the ever-increasing stock of our hydrogen bombs and the improvement in the quality of their delivery indicated that the American missile defense looked, as they say, like wet cardboard under a hail of boulders. The American elite finally lost their nerve when it became known that the USSR had created its own missile defense systems - the A-35 and its successor, the A-135, which turned out to be much more effective than their American counterpart. The Soviet system was capable of intercepting most American missiles, and those that would miss would not be able to deliver a critical blow to the Soviet Union. A symmetrical blow from Soviet nuclear forces would wipe the United States off the face of the earth. The nuclear arms race entered the parity phase, and Washington reasonably decided that it was time to reach an agreement. "KISS" IN ACTION On July 2, 1968, the Lyndon Johnson administration and the Soviet leadership led by Brezhnev indicated interest in nuclear arms control negotiations. In January 1969, when "Tricky Dick" Republican Richard Nixon replaced Democrat Johnson in Washington, Moscow formally agreed to begin negotiations. The new White House team suddenly took a break – and fell silent. And then the Americans began to link the course of the nuclear weapons talks with… the situation in the Middle East and Vietnam. They say that Moscow should make concessions on these two issues. A quiet dance of the two powers, resembling the soft steps of a cat, began. Allies were involved, spy networks were used, the press was monitored, and accidentally dropped phrases of diplomats were recorded - everything was subjected to careful filtering and analysis. Never in the history of the world had there been an analogy to an agreement on limiting nuclear weapons, this super-powerful trump card in a global war that never began. It was necessary to build a structure of communication, formulas for concessions, a technique for probing the motives of opponents from scratch, without ready-made templates. The era of nuclear diplomacy was coming, for which no university in the world had prepared. And as always, secret diplomacy started working before open diplomacy, and here the main role was played by another "sly one" - a diplomat with a serious intelligence background, Henry Kissinger. He had two nicknames - "Sly Fox" and "Kiss" - an abbreviation of his last name and at the same time "kiss" (Kiss). Apparently, thanks to his innate softness, charm and delicacy of communication, behind which hid a tough and skillful negotiator. He was opposed by the recent Deputy Secretary General of the UN, and since 1962 the USSR Ambassador to the USA, who confirmed his highest qualifications during the days of the Cuban Missile Crisis – Anatoly Dobrynin. On October 20, after a series of tense diplomatic clashes, the USSR forced the American government to announce its agreement to begin discussions on the issue of formal limitation of strategic arms (SALT). The Soviet delegation was headed by Deputy Foreign Minister Vladimir Semenov, a diplomat with 30 years of experience, which included working at the embassy in Berlin just before the war, "resolving" the Berlin crisis of 1948-49, and participating in the formation of the GDR. The Western press respectfully called him "the gray cardinal." The Americans put forward a specialist in the field, Special Assistant to the Secretary of State for "atomic" issues Gerard Smith, against our broad-based diplomat. BREAKTHROUGH AND A NEW DEAD END So the negotiations took place on two levels: confidentially in Washington “Kissinger-Dobrynin” and officially in Helsinki and Vienna “Smith-Semyonov”. To call the negotiations difficult is to say nothing. Moscow had counted on talking only with Washington. But the American side published Nixon's message: the US will not decide anything without its allies, whose interests the US has pledged to protect. A sharp turn in the negotiations for which Moscow was not prepared. Reminiscent of the behavior of Donald Trump's team during the negotiations on the START-3 nuclear agreement in 2020. Then, let us recall, Washington "dragged out" the negotiations, insisting that either China joins the Russian-American treaty (and China clearly did not intend to do this), or START-3 is not extended. As a result, the treaty was "buried". Half a century earlier, Nixon and Kissinger had the common sense to reach an agreement with Moscow, although the background for the Helsinki meetings was demarches, provocative articles in the press, loud statements and a minimum of firm guarantees. By 1972, the negotiations began to steer towards the final stage. Its first stage was Nixon's visit to Brezhnev and the signing of two documents on May 26: the open-ended ABM Treaty and the five-year Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I). But many important issues could not be settled. For example, the number of strategic bombers and missiles with multiple warheads (which replaced the old missiles and made it possible to increase the number of warheads without increasing the number of carriers themselves). And the five years of SALT-1 were supposed to pass quickly. New consultations began, but the next round of negotiations again led the situation to a dead end. A decisive breakthrough was needed, which happened after Watergate and Nixon's resignation. "Mr. Secretary General, I'm keeping my fingers crossed." Half a century ago, in November 1974, the new President Gerald Ford met with Brezhnev in Vladivostok. The President and Secretary General agreed on a new treaty, SALT II. The USSR and the USA were obliged to limit the number of strategic nuclear weapons carriers to 2,400 units, and restrictions were imposed on the number of ground-based launchers and on the deployment of nuclear weapons in space. According to Ford's memoirs, Brezhnev began to talk at length about the United States Congress, "which the Soviets saw as potentially detrimental to their ability to negotiate with American presidents. " Brezhnev asked Ford, "What Congress will you have to deal with in the next two years?" to which the president replied, "Mr. General Secretary... I can only say that I am keeping my fingers crossed." Brezhnev signed SALT-2 in 1979, already with the next US President Jimmy Carter, but the conversation with Ford turned out to be prophetic: the Senate, citing the “Soviet invasion” of Afghanistan, flatly refused to ratify the treaty. And the famous peacemaker Carter was playing a hidden game, which, incidentally, was also known in Moscow. Recently, in October 2024, the FSB declassified our intelligence data: in 1980, Carter signed secret presidential directive No. 59, which outlined a "new nuclear doctrine" that envisaged the possibility of the United States starting a full-scale nuclear war against the Soviet Union." But both the “dove” Carter and the “hawk” Ronald Reagan who replaced him were pragmatists, and Washington, mindful of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, formally observed SALT II, which was never ratified. SYSTEM COLLAPSE AND HYPERSONIC OVERTAKING Washington did not enjoy the position of the sole wielder of the nuclear club for long - 75 years ago the USSR ended this monopoly, and 55 years ago it forced the US to comply with rather strict rules of the game for the first time. Since Russia was lucky enough not to lose the nuclear triad after the collapse of the USSR, America has been polite in the post-Soviet era. Examples of this are the treaties on strategic offensive weapons: START-1 (1991-2009), START-2 (1993-2002) and the START-3 agreement signed in 2010. But already under George W. Bush, the United States began dismantling the system of checks and balances created in the last three decades of the 20th century. In 2002, the United States withdrew from the ABM Treaty, in 2019, under Trump, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) collapsed, and in 2023, already under Joe Biden, the New START Treaty was de jure terminated. Today's Russia has eliminated all risks associated with the US attempt to feel safe in the face of a retaliatory nuclear strike. Russia's current nuclear triad, its missile defense systems, and hypersonic carriers have cooled many hot heads in Washington. But in essence, we are once again in a situation of legal instability and turmoil of the mid-1960s. Only with the development of "hypersound" it is not we who are in a catch-up situation, but our opponents in the West. The spiral of nuclear diplomacy has completed its next turn and is heading into the future. |
Link |
Europe | ||||
Germany: Manhunt After Explosives Left At Berlin Station | ||||
2024-11-01 | ||||
[MSN-DW] German police are looking for a man who left a bag of explosives at Berlin's Neukölln train station. A police search is underway on Thursday in the German capital, Berlin, after a man left a bag of explosives at a Berlin train station on Wednesday evening. A police officer told the daily Berliner Zeitung that "it seems as if an attack has been prevented," as an explosion caused by the contents of the bag would have had "dramatic consequences" if it occurred near a group of people. The man ran away after he was subjected to a check by police officers. The bag was reportedly destroyed at a nearby car park in a controlled explosion.
Bomb squad officers discovered a drinks bottle wrapped in wire containing 500g (17½ ounces) of TATP explosives, along with a further quantity of cables and a believed stolen-in-2022 Polish citizen identity card.
kaboom!in an airport hotel room, it was reported at the time.
Berlin’s Neukölln district has developed something of a reputation for crime. As previously reported of the neighbourhood: well known for being both heavily migrant-settled and as being a centre of strength for German left-wing hard boys, who call themselves Antifa Related: Neukölln: 2024-08-07 Berlin court convicts activist for chanting 'from the river to the sea' at Gaza rally Neukölln: 2023-12-14 The truth behind Germany's education 'disaster' Neukölln: 2023-10-14 Europe Let in Too Many Foreigners, Says Henry Kissinger in Wake of Pro-Hamas Demonstrations Across Continent | ||||
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
Why are American Jews Liberal? A Eudaimonic Perspective | |
2024-10-07 | |
Because they (as most Westerners) live in a fantasy world? [IsraelNationalNews] Much has been written about why American Jews tend to be politically liberal, with reasons often citing Biblical-prophetic ethics, minority status, memories of right-wing persecution, atavistic empathy with the oppressed, and even "habit." While these explanations are valid and significant, they fail to address the core reason why American Jews, especially secular ones, find it harder to adopt a right-wing, conservative worldview without compromising their sense of happiness and fulfillment. Liberals generally perceive human beings as tabula rasa—a blank slate—whose inherent goodness and altruism are corrupted by social injustice, ignorance, and material deprivation. Conservatives, by contrast, take a far less optimistic view: they tend to assume that human beings are inherently selfish and prone to vice and violence unless restrained by societal structures. (interestingly, the Bible agrees with them in Genesis 8,saying that "man's heart is evil from his youth.") In essence, liberals believe that compassion, liberal education, freedom, and material security enable human flourishing. Conservatives, on the other hand, maintain that our selfish nature is best controlled through incentives and deterrents. This philosophical divide underpins two contrasting worldviews: one that justifies a more generous welfare state and lenient criminal justice system, and the other that vindicates capitalism and strict law-and-order policies. Given that American Jews are generally better-off socioeconomically and are more deeply affected by lawlessness, one might expect them to gravitate towards conservatism. Yet relatively few do. Even those who cast conservative votes often do so with reservations, lacking the enthusiasm of coreligionists embracing liberal causes. So, what explains this apparent contradiction? Western conservatism aligns with a historical narrative that primarily vindicates a rural white Christian worldview. But this narrative offers Jews a bleak and disheartening interpretation of history, particularly of Jewish history and the antisemitism that plagues it. A liberal worldview traditionally frames antisemitism as a temporary byproduct of ignorance and social injustice—flaws that can be corrected through education, tolerance, and equity, (although today's progressive and woke liberal ideology have made that framing questionable when it comes to antisemitism). According to the conservative view, however, antisemitism is neither temporary nor easily remedied; it is a persistent feature of human nature, naturally inclined toward envy, selfishness, and pettiness. Anti-Semitism is a form xenophobia, and xenophobia is a survival instinct. For Jews, this right-wing interpretation of history and human nature undermines the ethos of tikkun olam
This grim outlook can push secular conservative Jews to distance themselves from their ancestral identity. A notable example is Henry Kissinger, who, despite being a refugee from Nazi Germany, downplayed his Jewish heritage throughout his career. Similarly, Nigel Lawson, the architect of Margaret Thatcher’s economic reforms, also chose to minimize his connection to Judaism. The rest of this is an ad for orthodox Judaism - up to you. | |
Link |
Government Corruption |
Trump assassination attempt: Secret Service should have had team to approach suspicious people, expert says |
2024-07-31 |
[FoxNews] "All roads lead back to communication," Michael Verden said about Butler shooting. These people failed or disregarded all the basics. I continue to ask myself, "what would Gary say." Gary Prindiville, Sr. and his firm are available for self-defense training and seminars at (XXX) XXX-2800. Gary is the former director of Global Security for the former Anheuser-Busch, Inc. Companies (now AB-InBev). He is the founder of Prindiville & Associates, and current owner of GP Associates, LLC. Throughout his professional career spanning 32 years in corporate security and law enforcement, with more than 11 years in consulting services, he continues to be recognized as a leading expert and a pioneer of Security and Risk Management by renowned experts such as General Norman Schwarzkopf, Dr. Henry Kissinger, and John Walsh of “America’s Most Wanted”. In addition to his professional career, Gary is recognized as one of the most accomplished martial artists in the U.S. He currently holds a 7th degree black belt in the U.S. and Korean Judo Federations; he also holds a 3rd degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do. Although he competed successfully in martial arts, his primary focus is to empower women and assist youth in need through martial arts, self-defense, safety, and self- esteem training. Article |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
'Gothic gossip': who was molested by the 80-year-old 'Antichrist' Klaus Schwab |
2024-07-01 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Kirill Velesov [REGNUM] On June 30, one of the main international sensations was the article by The Wall Street Journal, “Behind Davos, Accusations of a Toxic Workplace,” which talks about numerous accusations of sexual harassment, discrimination against women, blacks and older people against the leaders of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. The material is based on letters of complaints from 80 former and current employees of the WEF, starting from the 80s, and the accusations are also addressed to the permanent head, creator and ideological inspirer of the forum, Klaus Schwab. ![]() According to the publication, senior managers harassed female employees, and this even happened to VIP guests of the forum. In addition, pregnant employees faced discrimination, were fired or forced to quit their jobs. Black employees were subjected to racial slurs, the WSJ puts it this way: “The N-word was used repeatedly. 80-year-old Klaus Schwab, the newspaper writes, personally ordered the dismissal of some employees over 50 years of age in order to reduce the average age of workers and improve performance indicators, deciding to “carry out a youth transformation of the organization.” The employee accuses him personally of harassment (sexual harassment) - “he offered the young employee informal communication.” Jorum representatives declined to arrange an interview with Schwab, and a press service said the article "inaccurately describes the organization, culture and colleagues, including the founder." "ARCHITECT OF TRANSHUMANIST REALITY" Klaus Schwab is a legendary figure, and therefore any news about him invariably becomes a sensation. He has received all sorts of titles in both the Russian and foreign press: "head of the world government", "architect of transhumanist reality", "antichrist", "global economic conspirator", "conductor of Russian perestroika reforms". They have been writing and talking about young girls (and boys) at the grand parties of the “world government” in the Schwab Palace for a long time, but this has never led to any consequences. Many major American media also regularly reported that Schwab's World Economic Forum had long ago transformed from a platform for discussing current topics into a source of unlimited income. Thus, according to Reuters and other sources, the WEF invested, according to some sources, $5 million in the startup Advanced Video Communications, which was then sold to the public technology company USWeb Corp, allegedly for $16 million. Initially, in 1971, Schwab positioned the forum as a meeting of leading European businessmen and politicians to discuss the prospects for the development of European business in the global market. But a few years later, a political agenda, environmental issues and gender inequality, global military threats and the education of “young world leaders” were added to purely economic issues. The most important guest of the forum has long been considered former US Secretary of State, international relations expert and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Henry Kissinger, who is called Schwab's teacher. In 2023, his speech at the forum became the center of the program, and he spoke on all topics at the same time: anti-Russian sanctions, the slowdown of the Chinese economy, the energy crisis in Europe, demography, climate. The theme of the 2024 forum was the adaptation of developed and developing countries to the “new unstable normal.” In particular, the head of the European Central Bank (ECB), Christine Lagarde, spoke about rising inflation, and the Director General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, spoke about a global restructuring of logistics due to ongoing military operations in different parts of the world. There were also scandals: Danish producer Damon Imani published a video in which he allegedly swore at Schwab while speaking at the WEF, cursing the “new world order” and globalists. The video turned out to be fake, but it was very actively discussed by all the world's media, some with the headlines “this guy said what all normal people would like to say.” In turn, a statement that was not fake — and no less shocking — was made by Schwab's adviser, World Economic Forum expert Yuval Harari. He spoke about the imminent likely emergence of a new religion and the influence of artificial intelligence on modern life: “Artificial intelligence can compose stories, create mythologies, entire religions. And I think in a couple of years there will be religions whose scriptures will be written by artificial intelligence. And what would a religion be like whose scriptures were created by an inanimate entity? POSITION ON UKRAINE As the architect of the “brave new world,” Schwab comments on any topical topic, and his words excite minds. In early June of this year, Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus called Schwab on behalf of the French economist Jacques Attali. In a conversation with a “colleague,” Schwab said that he considered the most likely end to the Ukrainian conflict to be the “Korean option”—a freeze of military operations along the existing demarcation line, and spoke about his acquaintance with Russian President Vladimir Putin : “But I have to say, off the record, that on my last trip before the coronavirus hit, I went to St. Petersburg, and I have known Putin since 1993, when I met him for the first time in St. Petersburg, where he was vice mayor. I talked with him for 75 minutes. He to some extent already spoke about the history of Russia, as he did in an interview with Tucker Carlson. He told me that Russia is not Europe. “You’re wrong, Klaus, Russia has its own identity, its own soul, its own history and so on.” Schwab also accused Ukraine of undermining Nord Stream and said that overall "everything must end in compromise." UNIVERSAL ACCUSATION Why is it that right now one of the leading Western publications is publishing a deafeningly incriminating article about Schwab and his forum? Starting with the case of American film producer Harvey Weinstein, who was accused of sexual harassment by such world stars as Angelina Jolie and Cara Delevingne, “harassment” has seemingly become a “universal” accusation in the West. Most often, accusations of harassment are made against famous actors, musicians, directors, and showmen. Thus, recently, the talk has been about the actor and TV presenter Russell Brand, the illusionist David Copperfield, and the stand-up comedian Louis C.K. A slightly different (it was about his underage stepdaughter), but no less high-profile story concerned the American director Woody Allen. Sometimes the targets of such scandals are people outside the world of art, and in this case the accusations are often politically motivated, and that a public figure has deviated from the general information mainstream. Two weeks ago, for example, Bloomberg reported that several SpaceX employees (women and men) filed a class action lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of sexual harassment. In addition to direct harassment, the billionaire was accused of offensive statements, publishing other people's nude photos with humiliating comments, and discrimination against vulnerable social groups. The investigation of this case with comments from the plaintiffs and anonymous testimonies was published by the same newspaper The Wall Street Journal. The topic predictably became an information bomb, especially due to Musk's regular statements about the conflict in Ukraine: he is skeptical about Western support for Volodymyr Zelensky and criticizes many anti-Russian decisions of the US and EU authorities. Perhaps the suddenly emerging facts about Schwab, helpfully provided by The Wall Street Journal, which often sets the agenda, do not indicate harassment as such, but that there are those interested in denigrating the “eminence grise of the new world order.” Moreover, gothic scary gossip about entertainment in his castle circulated for many years, but no one was interested. Related: Klaus Schwab 05/21/2024 Klaus Schwab Steps Down As World Economic Forum Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab 04/14/2024 Klaus Schwab was apparently admitted to the hospital seriously ill. Klaus Schwab 02/26/2024 UN and WHO: Stooges of the global rapists of humanity |
Link |
Economy |
Skyrocketing Food Prices Are Prompting Many Americans to Stock Up on Long-Term Storage Beef |
2024-06-29 |
[Gateway] If one watches corporate media or listens to the narrative coming out of Washington DC, inflation is going down and everyone should be happy with the economy. If one looks at the prices at the grocery store, they realize that the narrative doesn’t match reality. With some foods skyrocketing in price over the last year, it’s getting harder for Americans to keep their cupboards full. But some Americans are looking ahead, seeing the writing on the wall, and realizing the trajectory of the nation and the world points to food shortages and government-controlled distribution. "Who controls the food supply controls the people," Henry Kissinger once said. He was right. It doesn’t matter how independent and patriotic someone is. If they’re given the choice between bowing to government or letting their family members starve to death, nearly everyone will bow. "We don’t want anyone to bow to a tyrannical government because they didn’t have enough food to feed themselves and their families," said Jason Nelson, CEO of Prepper All Naturals. "I fought for a free country and the direction America is heading is away from freedom." Nelson, a disabled veteran who served in both the U.S. Marines and U.S. Army, left the military after a long career because of the Covid-19 "vaccine" mandates. When he returned, his desire to serve compelled him to launch his company in order to empower Americans with their own long-lasting supply of freeze-dried food. Ribeye, NY Strip, and Tenderloin are among the cuts offered by Prepper All Naturals. Nelson decided to go with premium cuts because of his own experience with "prepper" beef. "I tried the freeze-dried ’beef crumbles’ and ’beef chunks’ that were being offered to Americans as survival food and realized the apocalypse is really going to suck if this is our only option," Nelson said. "So, we came up with a better option." Click here to see what Prepper All Naturals has for you. Beef cubes offered by Prepper All Naturals are cut from all-American cattle. The cubes are cooked sous vide, then freeze-dried and placed in mylar bags with oxygen absorbers to make them shelf-stable for at least a decade. The USDA recommends freeze-dried beef be used within 25-years of being packaged. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Foreign Ministry: For now in arms control, Russia is offered to conduct a security dialogue only on US terms |
2024-03-19 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. [Regnum] For now, Russia is offered to conduct dialogue only on US terms, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on March 18. “For now, Russia is invited to conduct a dialogue exclusively on the US terms and only on those issues that are of interest to Washington,” the department told RIA Novosti. Diplomats called US proposals to begin an arms control discussion with Russia an exercise in hypocrisy and demagoguery. They added that Russia’s position remains unchanged; Moscow is ready to discuss issues of security and stability only in a single complex. As the ministry noted, Russia, in response to the West’s refusal of dialogue and the strengthening of the network of military bases near the Russian borders, will continue to create a fist of fire and successfully carry out the tasks of a special military operation in Ukraine. Earlier, on March 18, the American permanent representative to the UN said that the United States wishes to enter into bilateral discussions on arms control with Russia and China without preconditions. During one of the online conferences in December 2023, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said that the difficulty in relations between Moscow and Washington was the lack of dialogue. The politician drew attention to the fact that the biggest problem is that the United States has no dialogue with Russia at all. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said in November 2023 that relations with American partners are in a deplorable state. He stressed that in such a situation there should be no dialogue on arms control. |
Link |