-Land of the Free |
Who Counts? Trump Poised To Try To Remove Noncitizens From Census |
2025-07-04 |
[JOHNKASSNEWS] Editor’s note: The corrupt Biden administration opened the borders to millions upon millions of illegal migrants. Biden himself called on illegals to "surge" our borders. Some 20 million illegal migrant invaders—including the vicious and violent Tren de Aragua and other gangs—surged the border. Many were given housing and other government benefits courtesy of American taxpayers as American citizens watched helplessly. Many of the illegal migrants committed violent crimes against Americans. This is the Democrat policy of replacement. Only citizens can vote in America. But now comes another question: Should the illegals be counted in the U.S. Census for the purposes of apportioning Congressional districts and continue illegals having an impact on our politics? Is this what the American founders envisioned? On this Independence Day, you’re busy. I know that. But you’ve got a phone. So you might take a few minutes between grilling your hot dogs and other goodies and drinking a few icy cold beers to consider this thought provoking article by Benjamin Weingarten for Real Clear Investigations, "Who Counts? Trump Poised to Try to Remove Noncitizens From Census" It is still your country, isn’t it? Caring about your country isn’t some else’s responsibility. It’s yours. Thank you Real Clear Investigations. —John Kass [RealClearInvestigations] Following a years-long surge in illegal immigration, the Trump administration is poised to challenge a longstanding but legally fraught practice: counting illegal aliens in the U.S. census. President Trump tried to end the practice during his first term, but President Biden overturned his predecessor’s policy before it was implemented. Now, buoyed by red state attorneys general and Republican legislators, the second Trump administration is determined "to clean up the census and make sure that illegal aliens are not counted," White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller said last month. What Miller didn’t mention are the political implications of the administration’s move. It could have significant political implications because the census count is used to apportion House seats, determine the number of votes each state gets in the Electoral College for selecting the president, and drive the flow of trillions of dollars in government funds. Some immigration researchers project that including noncitizens in the census count disproportionately benefits Democratic states with large illegal alien populations. A recent study counters that, based on 2020 census figures, there would have been a negligible shift to the political map had the U.S. government excluded noncitizens from that count. But looking backward, those researchers found, red states would have benefited under the administration’s desired census counting shift. Had authorities excluded such migrants from the 2010 census, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and North Carolina all would have gained one seat in the House, while California would have lost three seats, and Texas and Florida would have each lost one seat — with the total number of Electoral College votes allotted each state changing accordingly. Since the first census in 1790, the nation has counted not only citizens but also residents to determine such representation. In addition to citing its long history, defenders of the practice say it is only fair that states should be given the power and resources to represent and serve everyone within their borders. Critics contend the government’s powers come from "We the people" — citizens or eligible voters — a government established before tens of millions of migrants resided in the country illegally. They also say the practice dilutes the representation of American citizens while incentivizing localities to promote illegal immigration. Trump’s first term hints at what is to come if his administration vigorously pursues a citizen-centric census policy. In July 2020, when the president issued a memorandum to exclude illegal migrants from the census, blue states and immigration groups challenged it in court almost immediately. Those challenges rose all the way to the Supreme Court. But it did not rule on the merits — whether all residents must be counted and if the president has the authority to exclude nonresidents — setting the stage for a battle over immigration and presidential power. THE MEANING OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT The census issue hinges on the Constitution’s language, which calls for apportioning House seats among the states "according to their respective Numbers." Those "Numbers" originally included "free Persons" and "three-fifths of all other Persons" — namely slaves, a result of the states’ compromise. The framers excluded "Indians not taxed" — Native Americans who were members of sovereign tribal nations, not citizens — from the count. After the Civil War, Congress passed the 14th Amendment to recognize the rights of the formerly enslaved. It states that congressional representation "shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State," again excluding Indians not taxed. Under the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, this population would be granted citizenship. Congress tasked the secretary of commerce with carrying out the census "in such form and content as he may determine." The president receives that data, is responsible for carrying out the apportionment calculations, and transmits the information to Congress. Echoing arguments against birthright citizenship, critics on the right say that the 14th Amendment aimed to address the status of former slaves, not masses of illegal migrants. They assert that including this population in the census artificially skews political power, effectively disenfranchises citizens, and incentivizes states to adopt sanctuary policies protecting people here illegally. "...[R]espect for the law and protection of the integrity of the democratic process warrant the exclusion of illegal aliens from the apportionment base, to the extent feasible and to the maximum extent of the President’s discretion under the law," President Trump wrote in the 2020 memorandum. The first Trump administration argued that the "persons in each State" that the 14th Amendment refers to had long been interpreted to mean "inhabitants." Inhabitants, it asserted, do not include "every individual physically present within a State’s boundaries at the time of the census," noting that past administrations had excluded temporary aliens and foreign diplomatic personnel for apportionment. The administration also argued that the Constitution and relevant law authorize the executive branch to determine who is to be counted as an inhabitant in the census. The president, therefore, had discretion to omit "persons with debatable ties to a State," like "aliens living within a jurisdiction without the sovereign’s permission to settle there." The administration pointed to Franklin v. Massachusetts to support its claims. There, the Supreme Court held that the President George H.W. Bush administration could include Defense Department employees deployed overseas in the census. Then, the Court found that the president’s duties in the census process are not solely "ceremonial or ministerial," and that federal law "does not curtail the President’s authority to direct the [Commerce] Secretary in making policy judgments that result in ’the decennial census.’" In testimony at the Democrat-led July 2020 House Oversight Committee hearing on the Trump memorandum, Republicans tabbed the head of the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, John Eastman, to defend it. The conservative legal scholar, much-maligned by the left for the counsel he provided President Trump regarding challenging the 2020 election, recently told RealClearInvestigations that the Declaration of Independence’s "consent principle" — the concept that government derives its power from the American people — "compels that only citizens be counted for purposes of reapportionment," and that the principle "is actually codified in the Constitution by excluding ’Indians not taxed.’" In Eastman’s view, that language signifies that the founders sought to omit "those who are not part of our political community, from the apportionment for representation." "President Trump would be on solid ground, therefore, were he to direct that the census either not count illegal aliens at all, or at the very least record citizenship status so that a proper apportionment of citizens could be conducted," Eastman said. The plaintiffs challenging the Trump administration contended that the 14th Amendment’s "persons" includes all residents irrespective of their immigration status; that the president lacked the discretion to deem otherwise; and that the process the administration had put in place to exclude illegal aliens was legally deficient. The president had issued a July 2019 directive in advance of his memo instructing the Census Bureau to collect citizenship data from various federal agencies, which would have been used to exclude illegal aliens from the apportionment count, raising additional legal questions. Testifying opposite Eastman at the committee hearing, former Census Bureau directors warned that the president’s memo would spook potential respondents and suggested the memo would minimally create the appearance of politicizing the census. Trump’s action reflected an "illegal desire of only counting citizens," said Vincent Barabba, former Census Bureau director under the Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations. "[H]is real objective...is to make sure less people will be counted in states with large minority populations which did not support President Trump or the positions he has taken." When litigation over the Trump census policy reached the Supreme Court, it punted. In December 2020, the justices held by a 6-3 margin in Trump v. New York that the plaintiffs lacked standing, and that the case was not ripe for adjudication — with Justices Steven Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissenting. Upon taking office, President Biden issued a first-day executive order revoking both of Trump’s policies. Excluding people based on their immigration status "conflict[s] with the principle of equal representation enshrined in our Constitution, census statutes, and historical tradition," Biden wrote. "Reapportionment shall be based on the total number of persons residing in the several States, without regard for immigration status." STATES PROVIDE A BACKUP PLAN The first Trump administration lost a related case at the Supreme Court. In 2018, the administration reinstated a question on the decennial survey about the citizenship status of respondents — a move that likewise came under furious legal challenge. The Commerce Department stated that it reinstated the question at the behest of the Justice Department, which was seeking superior data on voting-age citizens necessary to enforce the Voting Rights Act. Critics sued the administration, saying that including the question, which administrations had dropped after 1960, would chill immigrant respondents, leading to an unconstitutional undercount. In June 2019, the justices found that while reinstating such a question was legal, the process by which the president sought to do so was invalid, since the Commerce Department’s rationale for including it was "contrived" and "pretextual" — in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. If the second Trump administration fails to win court approval of its expected effort to exclude illegal migrants, this time around, it will have backup. Three days before Trump’s second inauguration, Louisiana, Kansas, Ohio, and West Virginia sued the Commerce Department, arguing that its prevailing practice of counting foreigners including illegal aliens at their place of "’usual residence...’ robb[ed] the people of the Plaintiff States of their rightful share of political representation, while systematically redistributing political power to states with high numbers of illegal aliens and nonimmigrant aliens." They want the federal court, among other things, to vacate this "Residence Rule" to the extent it requires the Census Bureau to "include illegal aliens and nonimmigrant aliens in the apportionment base." And they want to require the Census Bureau to include questions on the survey about citizenship, including one to determine whether non-citizen respondents are lawful permanent residents. In March, the federal court stayed the case at the Trump administration’s request. The administration said it needed time "to determine its approach to the Residence Rule." The White House and states plan to provide a joint status update on July 1. The Justice and Commerce Departments did not respond to RCI’s requests for comment. REPUBLICANS SEEK A LEGISLATIVE FIX In the interim, Congress has acted. During the last session, Republican members introduced the Equal Representation Act, requiring the census to include a citizenship question and exclude all non-citizens from the census count for apportionment. Democrats panned the bill, with the then-ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Jamie Raskin, writing in a minority report that "The plain reading of the [constitutional] text is clear as day, and the original purposes have been carefully articulated and never rebutted. For those who like to follow precedent, every apportionment since 1790 has included every single person residing in the United States, not just those lucky enough to have been given the right to vote." In 2016, the Supreme Court held that a state or locality may draw legislative districts based on total population, irrespective of the fact that some districts may have significantly larger voter-eligible populations than others. Writing for the majority, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that "we need not and do not resolve whether...States may draw districts to equalize voter-eligible population rather than total population." Fifty years prior, the Court held that Hawaii could use a registered-voter population base for its apportionment of state legislative seats due to the "large concentrations of military and other transients" in key population center Oahu. In May 2024, the House passed the Equal Representation Act on a largely party-line vote, but it failed to advance in the Senate. The current House reintroduced the bill by North Carolina Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards. He told RealClearInvestigations that "Americans deserve fair and equal representation, something that will not be possible until we eliminate the influence of noncitizens in our elections." The bill must first move through the Oversight Committee, chaired by Kentucky GOP Rep. James Comer. He told RCI that "American citizens’ representation in Congress should not be determined by individuals who are not citizens of the United States." Comer said his committee plans to move the bill again during this congressional session. The states suing the Commerce Department are adamant that their view should prevail irrespective of legislative action. Christopher Hajec, Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute — a legal nonprofit opposed to "unchecked mass migration" that is representing Kansas in the pending states’ suit — told RCI that "Whatever Congress does or does not do, our position is that the Constitution implies that illegal aliens should not be counted in the census for apportionment." |
Link |
Fifth Column |
FBI unmasks protester who attacked officers with cinderblocks at LA immigration riots |
2025-06-10 |
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] The FBI has identified the protestor filmed hurling cinder blocks at law enforcement vehicles during the anti-ICE riots, and Pam Bondi warns he and others will be hunted down. The suspect, who has so far only been named as 'Reyes', has been added to the bureau's most wanted list after a $50,000 reward was announced for information leading to the suspect's arrest and conviction. 40-year-old Elpidio Reyna 'That guy has just been identified, and they are doing a search warrant on his house as we speak,' Bondi told Fox News. The brute was photographed wearing a green and orange Los Angeles Lakers cap along with a mask as he was filmed breaking up cinder blocks into smaller pieces before tossing them at law enforcement. It was one of several abysmal acts by the immigration rioters, who have resorted to setting self-driving 'WAYMO' cars on fire or arming themselves with hammers at officers, LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said. At least 700 Marines have begun their journey into riot-torn Los Angeles along with 2,000 more National Guard troops as the city braces for another night of immigration protests. At least 74 people have been arrested in connection with riots of over the weekend with more to come as the chaos continues. The Marines from the 2nd Battalion were seen gearing up next to a convoy of Humvees at Twentynine Palms, 142 miles from Downtown LA, after President Donald Trump's controversial order. Harrowing scenes overnight saw demonstrators torch cars, attack authorities with fireworks, bricks of cement and tear gas and destroy infrastructure - even as state officials tried to maintain the 6,000 protests were primarily peaceful. The Marines and another 2,000 National Guard troops will join the 2,000 boots already on the ground as LA is turned into a battleground. Donald Trump has demanded anyone wearing a mask during the demonstrations be arrested. 'He has been identified by great police work by the FBI,' Bondi said to Sean Hannity of the man tossing cinderblocks. 'So you can run. You can't hide. We are coming after you, federally.' Asked at a news conference on Sunday night if LA needed the National Guard, McDonnell said he would have to 'make a reassessment', adding: 'Looking at tonight, you know, this thing has gotten out of control. 'We are overwhelmed We had individuals out there shooting commercial grade fireworks at our officers. That can kill ya.' Many, he said, were wearing masks - a direct violation of Trump's 'no masks' mandate. Police have resorted to firing rubber bullets into crowds in an effort to quell the violence, which first kicked off on Friday on the back of a series of coordinated ICE raids across the city. Governor Gavin Newsom lashed out at Trump as the violence escalated, accusing him of inflaming tensions by sending in the National Guard and insisting the crisis would be better handled by state authorities. California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the National Guard deployment 'unlawful' and said it 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty. Bonta sued the Trump administration Monday in response. This appears to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor. Trump has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' But Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass argued the state of California is instead being used 'as an experiment' by the Trump administration seeking to test the limits of its power. 'These are not the people we were told were going to be detained, and it makes me feel like our city is actually a test case,' she said. 'A test case for what happens when the federal government moves in and takes the authority away from the state or away from local government.' She said ICE agents had struck fear through the hearts of hardworking Angelenos, who are now constantly nervous about the next raids. 'I can't emphasize enough the level of fear and terror that is in Angelenos right now, not knowing if tomorrow or tonight it might be where they live, it might be their workplace, should you send your kids to school, should you go to work,' she said. Newsom said on X he had been informed of the decision. He called the move reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops.' 'This isn't about public safety. It´s about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' Newsom said. But both Trump and the Pentagon responded to Newsom with a greater show of force on Monday with the additional deployments. These troops are tasked with defending federal assets and personnel, including the federal immigration agents at the center of the conflict. The forces have been trained in deescalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, Northern Command said. These Marines are highly trained in combat and crisis response, with time in conflict zones like Syria and Afghanistan. Now, they'll be facing furious protesters - carrying gas canisters or other makeshift weapons in some instances - and have to quickly decide how to respond with an appropriate show of force. At least three buildings have been broken into and vandalized, according to LAPD chief Jim McDonnell, with 'significant damage and broken windows.' He has placed his city on a 'tactical alert', meaning LAPD officers can be mobilized and reallocated quickly to respond to incidents as they arise. The violent protests have sparked mass road closures and sweeping 'unlawful assembly' orders across the entirety of Downtown LA. McDonnell weighed in on the decision to mobilize Marines and the National Guard, raising concerns that 'without direct coordination [they] create logistical challenges and risks confusion during critical incidents.' According to a US official, troops will be armed with their normal service weapons but will not be carrying tear gas. They also will have protective equipment such as helmets, shields and gas masks. The Pentagon is working on a memo with clarifying language for the Marines that will lay out the steps they can take to protect federal personnel and property. Those guidelines also will include specifics on the possibility that they could temporarily detain civilians if troops are under assault or to prevent harm. Having the Marines deploy to protect federal buildings allows them to be used without invoking the Insurrection Act, one US official said. The Insurrection Act allows the president to direct federal troops to conduct law enforcement functions in national emergencies. But the use of that act is extremely rare. Officials said that has not yet been done in this case and that it's not clear it will be done. President George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth tweeted late Saturday that he was considering deploying the Marines to respond to the unrest. Bondi compared the streets of LA to a third-world country on Monday night, expressing disdain for protesters and warning any violence will be prosecuted. 'We can prosecute federally people who assault state law enforcement officers and we are going to do it, we are going to prosecute them federally,' she said. 'Look at it out there, it looks like a third world country. And it's not, it's the United States of America.' On Monday, the LAPD arrived at the Federal Building to disperse a group of protesters who had gathered there. Officers were seen in riot gear and wielding batons and rubber bullets, giving a large, agitated mob of protesters five minutes to evacuate from the area. One protester shouted 'we're fighting to die' as cops set off flash bangs and deployed tear gas. The rioting is still ongoing in San Francisco as well after the violence spread on Sunday. While horrifying scenes and stories of violence emerged from Downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, officers actually made more arrests in San Francisco, with 154 taken into custody compared to the 74 people picked up in LA. Related: Jim McDonnell 04/26/2024 Top Advisor to LA DA Gascon Arrested, Allegedly Stole LA Sheriff Deputy Personnel Files Jim McDonnell 12/07/2016 No evidence to verify bomb threat on L.A.'s subway system, investigators conclude Jim McDonnell 11/20/2016 Why So Many Police are Being Murdered Related: Jim McDonnell 04/26/2024 Top Advisor to LA DA Gascon Arrested, Allegedly Stole LA Sheriff Deputy Personnel Files Jim McDonnell 12/07/2016 No evidence to verify bomb threat on L.A.'s subway system, investigators conclude Jim McDonnell 11/20/2016 Why So Many Police are Being Murdered Related: Jim McDonnell 04/26/2024 Top Advisor to LA DA Gascon Arrested, Allegedly Stole LA Sheriff Deputy Personnel Files Jim McDonnell 12/07/2016 No evidence to verify bomb threat on L.A.'s subway system, investigators conclude Jim McDonnell 11/20/2016 Why So Many Police are Being Murdered Related: Jim McDonnell 04/26/2024 Top Advisor to LA DA Gascon Arrested, Allegedly Stole LA Sheriff Deputy Personnel Files Jim McDonnell 12/07/2016 No evidence to verify bomb threat on L.A.'s subway system, investigators conclude Jim McDonnell 11/20/2016 Why So Many Police are Being Murdered |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Shaddup, Already! The Air Force One 'Gift' Is Having Its Intended Effect |
2025-05-14 |
[PJMedia] In 1974, President Richard Nixon gifted Egyptian President Anwar Sadat a Sikorsky VH-3A Sea King helicopter similar to Marine One. After chain-smoking first lady Pat Nixon asked Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai for a cigarette and commented on how cute the pandas were in his special pack, Zhou gifted them two giant pandas. The Nixons also received a set of crown jewels. Azerbaijan gifted Hillary and Bill Clinton ...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of the word is... a priceless handmade rug with their images on it. President Reagan received a white horse from Mexico. And on and on it goes. Now, everyone is having a conniption fit over President Trump possibly receiving a 747 jetliner that Qatar ...an emirate on the east coast of the Arabian Peninsula. It sits on some really productive gas and oil deposits, which produces the highest per capita income in the world. They piss it all away on religion, financing the Moslem Brotherhood and several al-Qaeda affiliates. Home of nutbag holy manYusuf al-Qaradawi... currently uses as a charter jet. Calm down, everyone. Unless you're Crooked HillaryClinton ![]() the smartest woman in the world,usually described by the rest of us as The Thing That Wouldn't Go Away. Politix is not one of her talents, but it's something she keeps trying to do... and order staff to pack up all the good stuff out of the White House and send it to your new home, presidents can't keep gifts like that. In fact, they can't keep anything worth more than about $500. Even Hillary couldn't. She had to return $190,000 worth of furniture, dishes, rugs, TVs, and other items. They were given a chance to purchase other items and paid out $28,000 to keep them. Aside from concerns I have about the Qatari plane being a security fiasco because Qatar is not our friend and hasn't met a jihadi they don't love and want to fund, all of those spendy gifts go to the woke National Archives or other government entity and are doled out for loaning to museums and presidential libraries after the administration has used them. The two presidential Air Force One jets now in use have been flying since 1990 and have been used by every president since George H.W. Bush. The old ones were mothballed. This is the reason why former President Reagan was able to park one of those out-of-commission bad boys at the Reagan Library. But the discussion about the Boeing jetliner being gifted to the Trump administration has lit a fire under Boeing's CEO to speed up the delivery of the Air Force Ones. The Boeing jets have been on order since 2015, when Trump 45 complained that the time and materials contract was a disaster and demanded a renegotiation for an all-inclusive deal for one price and not a penny more in 2018. Trump saved the Air Force $1.4 billion over the previous deal. Initially, Boeing said it would get them out the door in 2024, but Trump said he wanted the craft delivered by 2021. But Trump left office, and nobody seemed to ride herd on Boeing. Recently, delivery dates were pushed back to some time in 2029. Trump 47 has been complaining about the slow production since his first days in office. But labor problems at Boeing and the defense contracting giant's difficulty in finding parts and components, along with other supply chain issues, have made it difficult to finish the two jetliners. Ortburg now says he hopes to have them done by 2027, before Trump leaves his second term of office. Qatar made the offer of the plane in February, and President Trump toured the craft when it was parked in Palm Beach, Fla., near the Summer White House at Mar-a-Lago. Let's recap: Boeing's late and probably over budget. Qatar offered a plane a couple of months ago. Trump toured said plane, noting that it will cost millions to retrofit it to minimum Air Force One standards. And Boeing is left sputtering about speeding up production. The mediacrats are shilling the fake news that Trump only wants the Qatari 747 for himself because they can't expand their minds to consider that what Trump really wants is for Boeing to get off their backsides and get these done. That's applying pressure on Boeing. Trump just did Boeing a solid in the recent deal with the UK. The company is a defense and national security asset, and now the man in the Oval Office wants them to get their production lines moving. Trump to Boeing: Help me help you, or I may buy a new plane and ask another company to kit it out. It's up to you, Boeing. |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
See inside Trump's magnificent new Air Force One jet... acquired from an unlikely source after Boeing failed |
2025-05-04 |
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] President Donald Trump is so desperate for a new Air Force One jet that he asked a Florida-based company to overhaul a plane once used by the Qatari government. The moves comes amid years-long delays in the provision of two replacements for the aging presidential planes that the president commissioned during his last time in office. After becoming frustrated at Boeing's apparently inability to deliver the order Trump wants L3Harris, a defense contractor, to transform the luxury aircraft previously used by Qatar by the fall, The Wall Street Journal reported. Back in February, Trump traveled to Palm Beach International Airport and toured the plane on the tarmac. Based on pictures of interior, which boasted leather furniture along with glimmering floors and ceilings, it matched perfectly with Trump's famously opulent taste in décor. Its a major setback for Boeing, which had been tapped during Trump's first term to deliver a new pair of state-of-the-art planes to replace the old ones that have been in service since George H.W. Bush administration. Boeing has fallen so behind on the $3.9 billion project that it now fears it won't be able to finish building the planes before Trump leaves office. They were supposed to be finished last year, but a series of supplier and engineering snags has caused the project to take years and go billions over budget. Behind the scenes it appears Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg's visit to the White House on April 18 did nothing to smooth things over. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
How China beat the |
2025-04-20 |
![]() The U.S. has known for decades that China has been stealing its intellectual property, and even Trump’s 25% tariffs under his first term could not stop it, prompting bolder action this time around, according to Gatestone Institute fellow Gordon Chang. From favored trade status to forced technology transfers, Beijing leveraged American goodwill, market access and corporate greed to become Washington’s most powerful strategic competitor. Around the turn of the century, the U.S. gave up its market dominance on critical minerals, began mass-importing Chinese goods and exporting intellectual property to access Chinese markets – all while the Chinese Communist Party grew into America's biggest foe. "The Chinese have been predatory, and they've engaged in criminal acts, theft of U.S. intellectual property. But the story here is not China," said China expert and Gatestone Institute fellow Gordon Chang. "The story here is that we allowed them to get away with this. We knew what was going on. We've known it for decades, and we never really took effective action to stop it." Here's a look back at five times China manipulated U.S. industry and policymakers into more favorable economic terms: MOST FAVORED NATION (MFN) STATUS AND WTO ACCESSION (1990S–2001) Throughout the 1990s, China lobbied aggressively to normalize trade relations – and found a key ally in President Bill Clinton. By 2000, Congress granted China permanent normal trade relations, paving the way for its entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001. At the time, China was already the world’s sixth-largest economy, with a population topping one billion. It was a stark contrast from the decades prior, when its communist system had kept the country largely closed off from global markets. And while China was already known for human rights abuses and heavy state control over its economy, it made vague promises of reform and cooperation – promises that helped win over the U.S. The U.S. hoped that bringing China into the WTO would check its communist government and accelerate its shift toward a market economy. By joining, China would have to cut tariffs and pledge to protect intellectual property rights. Clinton wasn’t alone in believing that trade with China would also export Western values. "No nation on Earth has discovered a way to import the world’s goods and services while stopping foreign ideas at the border," his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, had said. China’s WTO accession and Most Favored Nation status opened the floodgates to low-cost Chinese goods. Imports to the U.S. surged from $102.3 billion in 2001 to $426.9 billion in 2023, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Data. In the other direction, China imported around $26 billion worth of U.S. goods in 2001, according to Chinese customs data, compared with $147.8 billion in U.S. exports to China in 2023, according to U.S. import data. In the 1990s, Congress raised the de minimis threshold for imports to $200 – and in 2016, it jumped again to $800. Under that rule, goods valued below the threshold could enter the U.S. duty-free and without formal customs checks, a system intended to ease low-value shipments but since widely exploited by Chinese e-commerce sellers. President Donald Trump recently moved to eliminate the threshold for Chinese goods, closing a loophole that had allowed billions in untaxed imports to flood the U.S. market. RARE EARTH METAL DOMINANCE AS A PRESSURE TOOL (2010–PRESENT) As recently as the 1980s, the U.S. was a key player in the rare earth minerals industry, but price increases led its flagship Mountain Pass mine in California to close in 2000. China, with its cheap labor, near-nonexistent environmental regulations and cash flow from the government, now controls over 80% of the rare earth minerals market, which is crucial for electronics, defense systems and green energy. In 2010, China cut off Japan’s access to its mineral market in a diplomatic spat over a fishing trawler and territorial disputes. While not directly impacting the U.S., the move spooked Washington by proving China was willing to use its dominance of the market strategically. It shaped trade talks around tech and minerals – and prompted serious concerns about U.S. dependence on China’s mineral market that have yet to be fully addressed even today. The incident reframed China in the American mindset – not just as a trading partner, but as a rising strategic competitor. It also sparked broader cooperation between the U.S. and its Indo-Pacific allies. Since 2023, China has been instituting further crackdowns on mineral exports aimed at hurting the U.S., limiting access to gallium, germanium, antimony, graphite, tungsten and more. The Obama, Biden and Trump administrations have all moved to prioritize domestic rare earths mining, but the onerous licensing process and environmental regulations mean domestic projects can take decades to get off the ground. TRUMP’S FIRST TRADE WAR (2018-2019) In March 2018, President Trump launched a protracted trade war with China, accusing Beijing of "ripping off" the U.S. and stealing intellectual property. He began by imposing global tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum under Section 232, citing national security concerns. China retaliated with $3 billion in tariffs on U.S. exports like fruit, wine and pork. Then in April, the U.S. trade representative listed $50 billion in Chinese goods for tariffs under Section 301, citing IP theft and tech transfer. China responded with tariffs on soybeans, cars and airplanes, and Trump, under pressure from impacted farmers, offered bailouts for the agriculture industry. The trade war escalated in tit-for-tat fashion, with Trump slapping 25% tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods – and Beijing responding in kind – until tensions eased in 2020. In January 2020, Trump and Xi signed a "phase one" trade deal where China agreed to increase agricultural purchases by $32 billion over two years, purchase more energy and manufactured goods and improve IP protection and cease forced tech transfers. The U.S., in turn, agreed to suspend new tariffs and roll back some existing ones. China then doubled down on its "Made in China 2025" strategy, ramping up self-reliance in key sectors like technology and agriculture. Beijing’s central bank stepped in to cushion any economic fallout. PRESSURE ON U.S. CORPORATIONS TO SELF-CENSOR OR SUPPORT BEIJING'S POSITIONS China has long used its massive market leverage to coerce U.S. businesses into compliance - adding indirect pressure to U.S. policy discussions. Chinese actors have pressured various U.S. companies – Nike, Meta, Disney and the NBA - to toe the line on Taiwan, Hong Kong and the abuse of Uyghurs in the Xinjiang province or risk losing market access. In 2019, China lashed out at the NBA after the general manager of the Houston Rockets tweeted support for pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. Beijing swiftly suspended NBA broadcasts and severed ties with the Rockets entirely. A former Meta employee turned whistleblower, Sarah Wynn-Williams, has alleged that CEO Mark Zuckerberg developed and tested custom censorship tools to offer China in hopes of gaining access to its tightly controlled internet market. A Meta spokesperson has called Wynn-Williams' claims "divorced from reality" and false. TECH LICENSING AND IP TRANSFER TO ENTER MARKETS China has often required tech transfer or joint ventures as the price of doing business within the country, leveraging market access to gain access to intellectual property. U.S. firms, hungry for Chinese consumers, complied. But the demands gave China enormous economic benefit while weakening U.S. innovation and IP competitiveness. The practices were the grounds for Trump’s Section 301 investigations, first launched under the first term, that led to tariffs. Chinese theft of American IP costs between $225 billion and $600 billion annually, according to a 2018 report from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
The truth of Barack Obama's hopelessly-delayed $830 million DEI nightmare of a presidential library that may never be built |
2025-02-12 |
[Daily Mail, wherre America gets its news] Bolting billionaires. Ballooning budgets. A racial discrimination suit from a thwarted subcontractor. Who needs Jussie Smollett? The Obama Presidential Center (OPC) is turning out to be Chicago's greatest hoax. Sprouting up on the city's South Side in 2021 like an Egyptian funerary complex, the Taj Barack has already taken nearly twice as long to build as any presidential library in history. And at an estimated cost of $830 million, it's the most expensive... by hundreds of millions. That's enough to make King Tut's mummy blush, but it's pretty standard when it comes to the modern gods of the Democratic party. $1.5 million to 'advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces,' $70,000 for an Irish DEI-centric musical, $47,000 for a 'transgender opera' in Colombia and $32,000 on a 'transgender comic book' in Peru is just some of the spending from the now-shuttered US Agency for International Development (or as President Biden called it: The Taxpayer Cash Disposal Department). Never forget that Biden's White House took a $7.5 billion investment and built a grand total of eight electric vehicle charging stations over two years, which is just a hair-plug shy of his target of 500,000 EV stations by 2030. Hold my Chardonnay, said Kamala. She burned through $1.5 billion in 15 weeks on her way to electoral disgrace. But who needs results when you're playing with someone else's money? Well, now that Demolition Don is taking a sledgehammer to the federal bureaucracy the gig is up. And not just for taxpayer-funded sex changes in Guatemala. In the sweetest piece of irony ever, Barack's Chicago Shrine is turning out to be a near-perfect metaphor for the entire Democratic party. A black-owned concrete subcontractor is suing the structural engineering firm behind the project for $40 million claiming that they were discriminated against. Left lawyers have sought injunctions to halt the constructions after they uncovered plans to cut down 1,000 old-growth trees. And uncomfortable questions were raised over revelations that ex-White House flunky turned CEO of the Obama Foundation, Valeria Jarrett, raked in a cool $740,000 in a single year, to run the OPC straight into the ground. For a guy who once branded himself 'No Drama Obama', this has turned into a soap opera. And disillusioned Democrats are rethinking whether to toss more money on this presidential money pyre. Contributions first started drying up back in 2023 when donations plummeted by 50 percent from the year before – and the evacuation from the USS Obama seems to be accelerating. 'He's arrogant,' one erstwhile backer reportedly said of Obama last week. 'There's no quid pro quo because it's a one-way street.' Of course! It's the Chicago way... I scratch your back and you scratch mine. It's the American way, in fact. Is there any real mystery why Bill Clinton's presidential library reportedly raised more than 10 percent of its $165 million cost from foreign sources or why the royal family of Saudi Arabia gave $10 million to George H.W. Bush's library? The private tours can't be that good. These presidential vanity projects are just vehicles for ex-presidents to keep the party going long after they leave the White House. It should surprise no one that the money spigot is being turned off as Trump rescues the country from the sinking into the swamps of Washington DC. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Not the First Time. Why the US Is Right to War for the Panama Canal |
2025-02-01 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. In many ways, the appearance of this article underscores Russian Federation president Vladimir Putin's adaptation of the "Zhirinovsky Doctrine", which states the US holds sway over the Americas in the western hemisphere without interference from Russia, while Russia holds away over south Asia, again without opposition from the US and NATO. by Artemy Sharapov [REGNUM] In his “throne speech,” US President Donald Trump repeated his frequent promise to make the Panama Canal American again—to return the main artery of the Western Hemisphere to the ownership of the United States. ![]() Trump said that the authorities of the Republic of Panama (under whose sovereign control the canal, previously owned by the United States, has been since 1999) are not fulfilling their management responsibilities. Therefore, the United States must return what is its own, the newly elected owner of the White House is sure. It is significant that Trump is sending his newly appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio on his first foreign trip to Panama. "The most important thing is that China controls the canal. We didn't give the canal to China, we gave it to Panama, and we're giving it back," Trump said. Newly appointed Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, nicknamed "The Crusader," clarified on January 30 that the United States is prepared to use force to "ensure freedom" of navigation through the canal. Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino has issued more than one "decisive response" to threats from Washington. But it is ironic that Mulino did so on the X social network owned by Elon Musk, who recently astonished the world with an ambiguous gesture. If it was a "Roman salute," then it is quite consistent with the neo-imperial sentiments of the creators of the "new golden age of the United States": with plans to absorb Canada, Greenland, and take back the Panama Canal. However, the question of ownership of this 80-kilometer sea route has been a “sore subject” for the American administration over the past 150 years, so Trump is not original in his attempts to resolve this issue by force. By a curious coincidence, today, January 31, marks exactly 35 years since the last (at least, for now, the last) attempt to resolve the Panama issue by armed means. But before we recall in detail Operation Right Cause (which is what the American intervention of 1989 was called, without a hint of irony), let us recall the stage on which this action unfolded. THE CHANNEL AND THE SCANDAL Plans to build a canal through the narrow Isthmus of Panama, connecting the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (so that ships would not have to travel thousands of miles around Cape Horn), were first developed during the years of Spanish colonial rule in South America - but at that time such a project was practically impossible to implement. The benefits of building a waterway were obvious to everyone in Europe and the New World. As early as 1827, none other than Johann Wolfgang von Goethe predicted, “I shall be surprised if the United States does not take up such an undertaking.” But the French were the first to take up the matter. Colombia, which had owned the Isthmus of Panama since the 1830s, brought the Panama Canal Company, founded in Paris, into the project in the late 1870s. Construction dragged on for a decade. And as a result, the word panama entered the French language, and then all the languages of the world, meaning “a large and brazen scam.” The company, having "given a bribe" to ministers and hundreds of deputies, received permission to collect money from citizens under a winning loan, and then... went bankrupt. It turned out that half of the 1.3 billion francs invested in the project "disappeared". It was after this that the United States took over the initiative. The prediction of the author of "Faust" came true in 1903, when Theodore Roosevelt (also known as Teddy and Rough Rider) was president. The United States, rapidly gaining economic and military power, was actively expanding throughout Latin America - from the Rio Grande to Cape Horn. They were quite capable of implementing a project that promised to shorten the route from New York to San Francisco from 23 thousand to 9.5 thousand km. In 1903, a deal was made whereby the United States leased a strip of territory ten kilometers wide from Columbia for a period of 100 years. However, the process of ratifying the deal in the Colombian parliament stalled. The country had just ended another civil war (its events formed the basis for Gabriel García Márquez's novella "Nobody Writes to the Colonel"). The winners and losers were unable to reach a compromise on the canal issue, so the US decided to move on to plan "B" - separating the department of Panama from the Republic of Colombia by force. SEPARATION AND REVOLUTION In the fall of 1903, unrest and demonstrations began in Panama demanding independence for the region. Attempts by the Colombian authorities to suppress the protests were stopped by direct intervention by the United States. Teddy Roosevelt called this the Big Stick Policy, that is, “resolving conflicts” with the help of American military power. Trump clearly likes this approach as well. The Republic of Panama was proclaimed on November 3, and 10 days later the new state was recognized by the United States, after which the act of transferring the territory of the future canal to American control was ratified. After the completion of construction in 1914, the States established a de facto monopoly on its use. The state of Panama was essentially an American protectorate. In particular, local authorities were prohibited from having their own armed forces for fear that the strategic maritime trade route would be captured. Over time, the United States decided to create the Panama National Guard, whose tasks included fighting communist rebels. This decision played a cruel joke on Washington. In 1969, a group of National Guard soldiers, who had by then become a real force, overthrew the country's government. Colonel Omar Efraim Torrijos came to power, promoted himself to brigadier general and proclaimed himself the leader of the revolution. The junta led by Torrijos began to put pressure on the United States, demanding that it transfer control of the canal to the Panamanian Republic. In 1977, Líder Máximo de la Revolución - Supreme Leader of the Revolution Torrijos and US President Jimmy Carter signed an agreement on the neutrality of the canal territory and its subsequent transfer to Panama's control. However, on July 31, 1981, the Supreme Leader's plane crashed under unclear circumstances, and Torrijos himself died. But the process of nationalization continued under his successor. The new head of the republic was Colonel Manuel Antonio Noriega, one of the commanders of the National Guard of Panama. Coming from the lower classes, Noriega received the nickname "Pineapple Face" due to the consequences of smallpox he suffered. As an officer of the National Guard, he acted together with American intelligence services in the fight against Marxist movements. In this field, he earned the status of "Our Son of a Bitch" and could lead Panama without fear. Some may ask why the United States even entered into negotiations with some juntas and ceded the Panama Canal, which was so important to them. However, there is nothing surprising about this. By the early 1980s, the United States seemed to be losing ground around the world, losing its status as a superpower. The defeat in Vietnam in 1975, the anti-American revolution in Iran with the seizure of the American embassy hit the country's image very hard. The situation is somewhat similar to the situation in the United States today: an incompetent democratic government, failures in key areas of domestic and foreign policy, and a despondent mood in the White House. It seemed that the United States was close to defeat in the Cold War. AN EXEMPLARY FLOGGING IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY In this environment, a new administration came to power, led by Republican Ronald Reagan. The future president went to the elections with a set of slogans that were repeated in our time by another eccentric leader - Donald Trump. In fact, the slogan "Make America Great Again" was put forward specifically for Reagan's election campaign. The new president announced the beginning of a "Crusade" against communists. In 1983, for the first time since Vietnam, the United States decided to undertake a large-scale intervention. In late October, the United States launched a military operation in Grenada, overthrowing the country's leftist government, which was oriented toward the USSR and Cuba. "We could not allow the specter of Vietnam to hang over the country forever and prevent us from protecting our legitimate national security interests... We did not ask anyone's permission, but did what we thought was right," Reagan later wrote in his memoirs. However, the Noriega regime in Panama seemed to be under no threat so far. "Colonel Pineapple Face" remained in good standing in Washington and was considered an ally in the crusade against the "Reds." For a while, the United States even turned a blind eye to Panama's involvement in the Colombian drug trade, which by the mid-1980s had reached unprecedented proportions. However, Noriega committed a more "grave sin" in Washington's eyes. He was caught collaborating with the left. In 1988, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) accidentally discovered that Noriega's regime had colluded with the governments of Cuba and Nicaragua, which also had a stake in the Colombian drug trade. Once this became known in Washington, Panama's fate was effectively sealed. In January 1989, Reagan was replaced as US President by another Republican, George H.W. Bush. Bush, not distinguished by the odiousness of his predecessor, continued Reagan's policy, but used a fundamentally new strategy. In April 1989, the United States imposed tough economic sanctions against Panama. A month later, the country held presidential elections, which were won by the opposition candidate. Noriega did not recognize the election results. After that, the CIA organized an attempted coup in the country, which, however, was suppressed. Thus, the US tried out a model for changing undesirable regimes: economic pressure, attempts at an internal coup, and if that didn’t work, a direct military invasion. After the CIA's involvement in the coup was revealed, Noriega demanded that the US withdraw its troops from Panama. The next day, a provocative incident occurred: Panamanian National Guard soldiers killed an American soldier and raped his wife. The US government sanctioned the military operation "Operation Just Cause", which was to become a "show flogging". It was during the preparation of military actions in Panama that the United States first conducted an information campaign, justifying its actions by the need to “protect human rights” and “restore democracy.” This model was subsequently used to justify aggression against Iraq, Yugoslavia, Somalia, and a number of other countries. HARD ROCK FOR A DICTATOR A contingent of 26,000 people was formed to carry out the operation — mainly special forces fighters, supported by 100 armored vehicles and more than 200 military aircraft and helicopters. At the same time, there were only 11,000 people in the ranks of the Panamanian self-defense forces. The national guard had virtually no air defense, aviation, or armored vehicles at its disposal. On the night of December 19-20, 1989, the United States launched a massive air strike on Panama. The targets of the attacks were the bases of the self-defense forces, most of the military did not even have time to take up organized defense. After that, 84 transport aircraft dropped a large landing force of the 75th Special Forces Regiment in Panama, which captured military and civilian airfields. After that, planes landed with personnel and armored vehicles of the 82nd Airborne Division. Security forces loyal to the Noriega regime attempted to organize pockets of resistance, taking up defensive positions in government buildings and hastily constructed firing positions. However, the forces were initially unequal. By the end of the first day of the operation, the American military had captured the headquarters of the National Defense Forces, after which any organized resistance ceased. During the fighting, the American special forces lost 23 people killed and about 300 wounded. As a result of the aggression, 500 Panamanian citizens died, including 50 self-defense forces. Noriega tried to hide in the Vatican embassy, but the American military installed powerful speakers around the building playing heavy rock music. Three days later, the former dictator left the embassy and was arrested. Noriega subsequently died in a Panamanian prison, having served time in the United States and France. The out-of-control "son of a bitch" was punished - and this decision by Ronald Reagan, from the point of view of the current US administration, was correct. But - alas - Reagan did not reverse the decision, which Trump did not hesitate to call "stupid". The Torrijos-Carter Treaty remained in force, from 1979 to 1999 the Panama Canal Zone was under joint administration by the US and the Republic of Panama, with the prospect of being handed over to the Panamanians. This is what happened in 2000, when the United States handed over control of the canal to the country's government, concluding an agreement on the neutrality of the waterway. DREAMS OF REVENGE Trump also addressed the issue of “returning Panama” during his first presidential term – even then he was concerned about the contacts of the small but strategically important Central American state with China, with which Trump was waging trade wars. However, it is precisely now that the new president’s threats should be taken seriously. As in the late 1980s, the United States is experiencing an internal crisis associated with a loss of direction and failures in foreign policy. In this regard, the populism of Trump, who managed to win the election under the slogans of returning to “former greatness,” is becoming dangerous for its neighbors. During Trump's last term, the slogan "Make America Great Again" was discredited because it was not backed up by real action. So the US may well go for a small, demonstrative military operation to prove to other countries and to itself: we are still strong and ready to achieve our goals. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Trump wipes the smile off Obama's face - Washington Examiner |
2024-12-19 |
![]() ...The man who was so stupid he beat fourteen professional politicians, a former tech CEO, and a brain surgeon for the Republican nomination in 2016, then beat The Smartest Woman in the Worldin the general election. Then he beat Kamala while dodging bullets... 's most striking characteristics today are clarity, confidence, and calm. This is extraordinary in a man renowned for chaos, confusion, and the thin-skinned hurling of demeaning insults. But it is a truth that needs to be acknowledged and accounted for to understand what we are witnessing as Trump prepares to resume the presidency. His presser at Mar-a-Lago on Dec. 16 revealed a man almost preternaturally at ease with himself, his mission, his domestic support, and his acceptance abroad. His tone was measured, even somewhat humble, despite some bragging. When he dismissed questions, as he justifiably did once or twice, it was not done angrily or in a way that looked petty but with an assurance that widened the gap between himself and his erstwhile adversaries. The press asked questions almost deferentially, showing respect for his office and a quietude rooted in the magnitude of his political triumph and mandate. The spectacle was a stunning contrast with the media maelstrom of his first term, when the likes of CNN ...formerly the Cable News Network, now who know what it might stand for... 's Ace Newshound Jim Acosta ...CNN's showboating White House correspondent... , posing vainly as a modern-Danton or people's tribune, treated Trump as though he were axiomatically as illegitimate a president as Crooked HillaryClinton ...former first lady, former secretary of state, former presidential candidate, Conqueror of Benghazi, Heroine of Tuzla, formerly described by her supporters as the smartest woman in the world,usually described by the rest of us as The Thing That Wouldn't Go Away. Politix is not one of her talents, but it's something she keeps trying to do... and others bitterly claimed. But as the days and weeks of the current presidential transition pass by, the significance of the stunning electoral outcome on Nov. 5 is settling on Trump, the nation, and the rest of the world. Van Jones, one of the Left's level-headed analysts, captured the truth lucidly in an interview with CNN's Chris Cillizza. When Cillizza asked Jones how such a supposedly unlikely guy as Trump ''became the one that cracked the code,'' Jones rejected the premise of the question. ''Can we cut it out? — Donald Trump is smarter than me, you, and all critics. You know how we know? Because he has the White House, the Senate, the House, the Supreme Court, the popular vote, he has a massive media ecosystem bigger than the mainstream built around him and for him, and a religious fervor in a political movement around him, and his best buddy is the richest person in the history of the world, and the most relevant Kennedy is with him. This dude is a phenomenon. He is the most powerful human on Earth in our lifetime. And we're still saying, 'How is this guy doing it?' We look like idiots.'' Jones's litany would give anyone confidence in their position and their power. Trump is the only president other than Grover Cleveland, kept in touch with the world by Obamaphone, ...was ruled by a Democrat machine from 1942 through 1971. After the river caught fire during the administration of Carl Stokes they tried a Republican, then went back to being Democrats when the party hacked up Dennis Kucinich... 130 years ago to win reelection after defeat. Assuming he completes his second term in office, he will have led the Republican Party for as long as Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush combined. He was impeached twice, hounded by corrupt officials in a banana-state-style lawfare campaign, convicted on 34 trumped-up felonies, faced two liquidation attempts, was shot once, and faced voters who'd been told by what was once the opinion-forming elite that he was manifestly ineligible for election and should be rejected. In the face of all this, America essentially said, ''Stuff that,'' and chose him to return to office, sweeping all swing states with a near landslide in the Electoral College and a plurality of the popular vote. Whereas in 2016, Trump could be seen as an aberration and supported by fewer voters than opposed him, today, no such self-deception is available to his detractors. The change means that he is approaching governing with a more radical reform agenda, which he is articulating with more sober and persuasive rhetoric. Although he pledged in 2016 to ''drain the swamp,'' he approached that task, if at all, only tentatively despite much braggadocio. Now, he is arriving in office more determined in his goals but more restrained and deliberate in his language. It has produced in him less swagger and more solidity. His opponents and critics have yet to work out how to respond. In the face of Trump's popular election victory, the largely silent Left and foreign leaders know that a repudiation of Trump would now be read as a repudiation of America. Naturally, foreign leaders, many of whom are already on thin ice with their own people, will not do that. And here in the United States, many critics will not do it yet. President Joe The Big GuyBiden ...46th president of the U.S. Former Senator-for-Life from Delaware, an example of the kind of top-notch Washington intellect to be found in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body.... has vanished, and Trump is universally treated as the leader of the world's most powerful nation. This was apparent early this month at the reopening of Notre Dame Cathedral in Gay Paree and at his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and French President Emmanuel Macron. In 2016, then-President Barack Obama I inhaled. That was the point... mocked a tweet in which Trump called him ''perhaps the worst president in the history of the United States.'' Obama responded, ''At least I will go down as a president,'' and then dropped his mic to emphasize his smiling contempt. We cannot know how Trump's second term will pan out. But his political achievement already outshines that of Obama, who is no longer smiling. |
Link |
Government Corruption |
CHUCK DEVORE: Comparing Biden-Harris bungled Helene response to past disasters |
2024-10-06 |
[FoxNews] Media attacked Bush over Katrina, but ignores Biden-Harris failures as Americans suffer. For five days, the U.S. Army’s helicopters stayed on the ground. The Biden-Harris administration’s response to Hurricane Helene has been slow, weak, and deadly—but, except for Fox News, you wouldn’t know it from the major media. Hurricane Helene made landfall on Thursday, Sept. 26, at 11:10 p.m. The following Thursday, a reporter asked President Joe Biden about the storm zone. Biden responded, "Oh, storm zone? I don’t know which storm you’re talking about…" Biden then recovered and claimed, "They are getting what they need, and they are very happy across the board." The day before, five full days after the storm dumped up to 30 inches of rain in some mountain locations, Biden ordered 1,000 active-duty troops to provide assistance with 22 helicopters as well as tactical vehicles from Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg), some 250 miles east of hard-hit Asheville, N.C. There are about 50 utility helicopters in the 82d Airborne Division’s Combat Aviation Brigade at Fort Liberty. The military installation in Fayetteville, the U.S. Army’s largest, has almost 100,000 active-duty and reserve soldiers available for presidential call-up—so, Biden sent 1% of Fort Liberty’s personnel and less than half of the base’s much-needed helicopter inventory. Meanwhile, the federal government’s emergency management arm, FEMA, warned it’s out of money because it has spent $1.4 billion on aid to "sanctuary cities" swamped with illegal aliens and mostly fake asylum seekers. FEMA said it sent 150 generators to the stricken region. But there are at least double that number of generators available for purchase within an hour’s drive of any typical city. Displaced citizens in the Appalachian region hit by Helene are at risk of illness due to contaminated water—and in danger from human traffickers who prey upon the confused, weak, and vulnerable. The hundreds of military police from Fort Liberty’s 503rd Military Police Battalion and the 82nd MP Company could prove a powerful deterrent in shelters—if they were activated. So, how does the Biden-Harris disaster response compare to other recent events? The media and Democrats heaped scorn on President George H.W. Bush’s federal response to the L.A. Riots in 1992 and then again on President George W. Bush’s Hurricane Katrina actions in 2005. I was a California Army National Guard captain during the 1992 L.A. Riots. Within three days, we had 10,000 Guard soldiers on the ground, quelling looting and arson. Rioting started the evening of April 29. The following evening, a National Guard MP company was on the scene. The next day, 4,000 Guard soldiers were in the city and President Bush ordered active-duty Army and Marine forces into action as well as 1,000 federal law enforcement officers. By May 2, there were 10,000 Guard members and 3,500 active-duty soldiers and Marines keeping order in L.A. So, the elder Bush ordered 3,500 active-duty personnel into L.A. three days into the emergency while Biden took five days to decide to send 1,000 soldiers to help. Hurricane Katrina made landfall on Monday, Aug. 29, 2005, around 4:30 a.m. At Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco’s request, President George W. Bush had issued an emergency declaration on Saturday, Aug. 27, two days before landfall. Within a day of impact, U.S. Coast Guard helicopters were already working, rescuing some 350 people from rooftops. Bush viewed the devastation from the air on Aug. 31 and was roundly criticized for flying over, rather than seeing things on the ground. On Sept. 1, Bush asked Gov. Blanco to allow a federal takeover of the relief efforts, which by then included 15,256 Guard members expected to grow to more than 40,000 personnel from neighboring states. Bush visited the scene of the disaster only two days after landfall. Two days after Helene, Biden was on the beach in Delaware, "commanding," as he claimed, with two hours of phone calls. Vice President Kamala Harris was fundraising on the West Coast. The U.S. military’s chain of command for this disaster runs from Biden to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin to the commander of the U.S. Northern Command. Biden’s slow and confused response to Hurricane Helene—taking two more days to come to grips with the crisis than did his two recent predecessors—speaks of a president who is out of touch and not up to the job. The Biden-Harris administration’s sluggish and half-hearted disaster response has put hundreds of thousands of Americans at risk in Helene’s swath of destruction. Biden’s lackluster engagement in the most powerful office on the planet puts the entire nation in peril as the world spirals into chaos while Harris focuses her time and energy on running to replace Biden while hiding from the media. |
Link |
-Land of the Free |
Navy Recruits Very Good Boy to Help Sailors on Extended USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Deployment |
2024-08-19 |
[USNI] The most popular member of the crew aboard USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) for its marathon deployment to the Middle East was not Ike’s commanding officer Capt. Christopher “Chowdah” Hill, despite his social media clout, chocolate chip cookies and support for Taco Tuesday. This crew member had a leg up on Hill. Actually, he had two. That distinction goes to Captain Demo, a golden retriever/labrador mix, a multi-talented expeditionary facility dog tasked with everything from comforting sailors during therapy sessions to general morale improvement. Thanks to a partnership with the Virginia Beach nonprofit Mutts with a Mission, Demo is one of three dogs currently attached to warships. A fourth dog is preparing to deploy with the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) later this year. Like his 5,000 shipmates on Ike, Demo spent all nine months on the aircraft carrier during the deployment, which was marked by combat actions in the Red Sea. While on board, he slept on a large dog bed in a stateroom shared with one of his two handlers, Hospital Corpsman Kindal Kidd told USNI News aboard the carrier. He had two heads, as well, where he could go to the bathroom. Most days, Demo spent time with his handlers walking around the ship and visiting sailors. Their faces would light up when they saw the dog coming, Kidd, who is one of the handlers, said. PREPARING TO EM-BARK ON A SHIP The partnership between the Navy and Mutts With A Mission began with 2022, director Brooke Corson told USNI News this week. The wife of then-commanding officer Capt. Dave Pollard, of the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN-77), reached out to Mutts With A Mission to see if the nonprofit could bring dogs aboard the ship, she said. Prior to the ship’s deployment, Mutts With A Mission brought dogs aboard weekly. Other ships started requesting dog visits. After an October 2022 visit on amphibious warship USS Wasp (LHD-1), the ship’s executive officer and deployed resiliency counselor asked if it would be possible for a dog to deploy on the amphibious ship. There is a long history of dogs aboard ships, although in a more personal capacity. Capt. Frederick Sherman brought his black cocker spaniel named Admiral Wags on his ships, according to “Dogs in the Navy” from the Naval Institute Press. Admiral Wags’ tales became fodder for a children’s book written by Sherman’s wife. Aviators also brought a stray dog named Scrapper Shrapnel – “Scrappy” for short – aboard their aircraft carrier after finding the airedale terrier wandering the Pearl Harbor docks in 1943. But there had not been an official program that used dogs as working animals to assist with mental health needs. Dogs, and other animals like horses, are known for beneficial effects on people. A 2022 meta-analysis in scientific journal PLOS One found that veterans benefited when placed with an assistance dog, while a 2023 study of Australian veterans and emergency services personnel found that those with an assistance dog had decreases in stress and depression. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
How Kamala Harris's affair with a much-older Democrat kingpin catapulted her career |
2024-07-07 |
After Kámala Harris Former Oakland mayor Willie Brown's former mistress, then a senatrix from California former 2020 Dem presidential hopeful, and Joe Biden's wing nut... ' campaign for president flamed out in late 2019, her Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, power-player ex advised against her accepting any offer to be second banana on the Democratic ticket, warning that the vice presidency would actually be the nail in the coffin to any future White House ambitions. Former the Socialist paradise of San Francisco ![]() mayor Willie Brown - now 90 - wrote an op-ed in the San Francisco Chronicle warning his one-time lover Harris to decline Joe The Big GuyBiden ...46th president of the U.S. ‘This Is A Man ThatDoes Not Seem Demented’... 's summer of 2020 offer, because 'historically, the vice presidency has often ended up being a dead end.' 'The glory would be short-lived, and historically, the vice presidency has often ended up being a dead end,' Brown wrote. 'For every George H.W. Bush, who ascended from the job to the presidency, there’s an Al Gore ...Former Vice President, Nobel Prize winner, Global Warming prophet and speculator, and crazed sex poodle Al Gore... , who never got there.' But as Democrats ...every time you hear the phrase white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... are now falling back in love with Harris out of necessity as they scramble to try and replace Biden at the top of the 2024 ticket following last week's cringe-worthy presidential debate performance, it appears that Brown got it all wrong. Or at least he didn't account for opportunity knocking, because it is precisely Harris' position as VP that, despite her polling and behind-the-scenes unpopularity, has now made her the obvious choice in the eyes of many to replace Biden. While Biden has insisted that he is fit to stay in the race and govern should he beat Donald Trump ...Perhaps no man has ever had as much fun being president of the US... in November, Democratic operatives have reportedly already chosen Harris, and are now even discussing who her running mate should be. |
Link |
Science & Technology |
Law Professor Dr. Francis Boyle, Who Drafted the 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act, Claims COVID-19 mRNA Injections are Weapons of Mass Destruction in New Affidavit |
2024-06-10 |
[Gateway] Dr. Francis Boyle, a Harvard-trained professor and the architect of the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was unanimously approved by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush, has issued an affidavit declaring COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction, Dr. Joseph Sansone first reported. Dr. Boyle’s affidavit, which was submitted as part of an emergency petition for a writ of mandamus in Florida, argues that the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines violates several statutes, including the U.S. Code on Biological Weapons and Florida’s statutes on weapons and firearms. This petition, aimed squarely at Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody, calls for an immediate halt to the distribution of these injections in Florida and demands the confiscation of existing vaccine supplies. According to Dr. Joseph Sansone, the original Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court. It was later transferred to the Circuit Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024. After the Circuit Court dismissed the case on April 9th, 2024, it moved to the appellate court. The Appellate Brief was filed on Memorial Day, May 27th, 2024. Dr. Boyle, one of the world’s leading legal experts on biological weapons, has added considerable weight to the case with his affidavit. The case already boasts a substantial body of evidence provided in the writ of mandamus, including affidavits from med-legal advisor and biotech analyst Karen Kingston and Ana Mihalcea, M.D., PhD. According to Dr. Sansone, the pleadings claim that the distribution of these injections violates several laws, including: Related: Francis Boyle 10/03/2022 Why Additional Engineered Pandemics Are To Be Expected Francis Boyle 05/27/2020 French Intel Officials Warned In 2004 Building Wuhan Lab Could Lead To ‘Catastrophic Leak,' Report Says Francis Boyle 04/08/2020 Rep. Lance Gooden: Allow DOJ to Investigate China for Coronavirus Bioweapon |
Link |