Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Britain
'Invisible ink' al-Qaeda plotter released early from prison
2011-09-19
A member of al-Qaeda nabbed for ten years in 2008 for his part in a terror plot has been released early from prison.

Habib Ahmed, 32, was convicted after being caught smuggling code books written in invisible ink into the country. He was part of a British terror cell, headed by Rangzieb Ahmed, that police believe were planning a massacre in Britannia. But despite being nabbed for ten years in December 2008, he has now been released and is living at a bail hostel in Manchester.

During his trial the court heard how Ahmed downloaded a document called "a study of liquidation" and looked up bomb-making techniques. He also checked on the addresses of former Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon, military bases and senior coppers. He was caught when British Customs found notebooks containing names and phone numbers of key al Qaeda figures as he flew from Dubai to hand them to

Ahmed was incarcerated in 2006 and so had spent five years in prison including time spent on remand.

A front man for the National Offender Management Service said: "Serious offenders on licence are subject to strict conditions and controls."
Link


Britain
Brown accused of blocking helicopter purchases
2010-01-11
[Iran Press TV Latest] One of the two former cabinet ministers who launched a failed leadership coup against British Prime Minister Gordon Brown last week has attacked the premier on the unpopular war in Afghanistan.

Former defense secretary Geoff Hoon has returned to the limelight with leaked ministerial letters dated from 2002 to 2004 showing how Brown, who was the finance minister at the time, forestalled his acquisition of battlefield equipment deemed vital for the troops' survival in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Hoon and a former health secretary, Patricia Hewitt, emailed a letter to lawmakers from the ruling Labour Party, calling for a secret vote on Brown's leadership to save the "deeply divided" party.

Brown's allies dismissed the two as embittered traitors, but the newly leaked documents could undermine Brown's leadership in the run-up to the general elections due by June.

According to the leaked letters, Brown personally blocked the Ministry of Defense (MoD) from spending extra Treasury cash on helicopters for Iraq and Afghanistan, despite earlier assurances.

The controversy surrounding shortage of life-saving choppers used to mobilize troops in the field of battle sparked outrage among the British public -- which is already unhappy with the UK's involvement in the Afghan conflict.

Brown's actions effectively prevented military chiefs from buying new helicopters, which could now be in service in Afghanistan, the Sunday Times said.

Downing Street played down the revelations, noting that while in office as the defense secretary, Hoon himself had declared he had received an "excellent" deal from the Treasury on MoD funding.

In August 2009, a leaked official dossier allegedly suppressed by lawmakers gave a damning account of MoD's acquisition program over the past 11 years since the last official review.

The author of the secret report, Bernard Gray, a former special adviser to Labour defense ministers, accused the department of "endemic" failures.

"We are at present fighting a tough infantry war of mobile patrolling against insurgents. In this war, more and better helicopters and armoured vehicles are the key to rapid response and reduction in casualties," he wrote.

"Yet, the MoD seems more concerned to find huge funds for two aircraft carriers and a replacement for Trident. This would give priority for expenditure on weapons systems we are unlikely to use rather than the weapon systems we are actually using in combat in Afghanistan," Gray stressed.
Link


Britain
Gordon Brown accused of taking 'wrong' EU job
2009-11-21
Critics said he had sacrificed a powerful economic post in the European Commission in favour of installing Baroness Ashton as the first EU foreign minister.

It opens the way for Michel Barnier, a centre-right French politician, to be named the next internal market commissioner overseeing financial regulation next month.

Mr Barnier, a former commissioner, is well known as defender of French protectionism and is hostile to the "Anglo-Saxon" free market model of capitalism.
Because the French center-right is a very different place than the British or American center-rights.
The prospect has alarmed the City of London, where many banks fear the imposition of new EU regulations on the financial services sector.

William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, said Mr Barnier was a "serious concern" and a threat to "the economic issues that affect Britain the most". He previously called for Britain to pursue one of three major economic post and accused the government of pursuing the "wrong priority".

"Our French partners have a different view on market issues that touch on Britain's vital economic interests," he said. "Now that Britain will no longer have an EU Commissioner with a major economic brief it will be vital that the British Government, whichever party is in power, engages closely with the Commission to ensure that it keeps to a pro-growth agenda."

On Friday, French diplomats suggested Mr Brown had agreed to back Michel Barnier for the job in a "quid pro quo" deal for Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, accepting Lady Ashton. Downing Street categorically denied any such deal had been done.

Despite publicly backing Tony Blair for the post of EU President, Mr Brown is understood to have prepared a secret "Plan B" negotiating position in Europe. He privately accepted several weeks ago that Mr Blair had little hope of winning because of a proposed EU deal where centre-right parties picked the president and left-wing parties got to fill the foreign policy job.

Despite pressure from the Treasury to seek an economic portfolio in the new European Commission, Mr Brown decided to accept an offer from the Party of European Socialists bloc for a Briton to take the foreign policy job. Many European socialists wanted a Briton in one of the big jobs to "bind in" the UK to the EU in case the Eurosceptic Conservatives take power next year.

But yesterday critics warned the arrangement left Britain open to attempts to enforce heavy-handed regulation of the economy.

Mats Persson, of the eurosceptic think tank Open Europe, said: "This appointment is part of a very deliberate French strategy to challenge the Anglo-Saxon model in general and the prominence of the City of London in particular."

It came as it emerged that Lady Ashton, Europe's new foreign policy chief, was effectively only the fourth choice for the foreign minister job.

David Miliband, the foreign secretary, Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, and Geoff Hoon, the former defence secretary, were all discussed before Lady Ashton emerged in a last-minute compromise between Mr Brown and other European leaders in Brussels.

Lady Ashton herself only heard of her nomination at 5pm on Thursday and had not prepared a formal acceptance speech. Her appointment was greeted with widespread disbelief across Europe.

French diplomats were particularly hostile, and one described the move as "a joke."

Many of the EU officials who will work for her new European diplomatic service are also unhappy. "We are going to see resignations over this," said one.

In a BBC Radio Four interview on Friday, Lady Ashton defended the way she was appointed, she said: "This is not about a fudge, it's about trying to reach a conclusion."

A Downing Street spokesman added: "Cathy Ashton was chosen for the important post of high representative because she was a strong candidate with widespread support across Europe."

The first choice for the post was Mr Miliband but he ruled himself out saying he wanted to stay in the UK. Speaking to the Daily Telegraph in Afghanistan before the decision was announced, Mr Miliband confirmed he had effectively been offered Lady Ashton's job. He said: "Look, it is very flattering. It's a great honour and a great job, but I came into politics because I was committed to politics in Britain."

When asked if he hoped to be the next leader of the Labour party, he said: "Che sera sera."
Link


Britain
Who will put this exhausted, discredited and ridiculous regime out of its misery?
2009-06-04
All governments end in failure. But never in modern British political history has there been a collapse as startling and dramatic as that which is taking place at Westminster this week.
Attention: British writer in full spate. Prepare for deliciously cutting languiage. You have been warned!
The Labour Party has been braced for months to receive a drubbing in today's European and local authority elections. But even before the first ballot is cast, never mind counted, ministers have been throwing themselves from high places in a fashion that would incur the disbelief of lemmings. Many of those who survive appeared last night in a state of mutiny as Gordon Brown took his first bumbling steps towards a Cabinet reshuffle. The latest rout began on Tuesday.

A clutch of ministers and MPs broke it to their families that, like it or not, they intend to spend more time with them. Jacqui Smith, Tom Watson, Beverley Hughes and Patricia Hewitt led the list of parachutists suddenly proclaiming a determination to return to the simple pleasures of dish-washing, bedtime stories and other activities in which, presumably, they will do less damage to the national interest.

Hazel Blears, she of the imbecile grin, yesterday joined the rush, at least 48 hours before her inevitable sacking. Chancellor Alistair Darling appeared to be living on borrowed time, following revelations about his abuse of Commons allowances. But reports last night suggest that he is clinging to his desk at the Treasury, rejecting proposals of a job swap.

Geoff Hoon, the Transport Secretary, is even more tarnished by the expenses scandal, but may be less vulnerable because no one notices whether he belongs to the front bench or not.

And the Prime Minister? Gordon Brown inhabits an extraterrestrial zone far off among the planets. He has divorced himself not merely from the electorate, but from mankind. His public pronouncements are periodically beamed back to Earth from a Downing Street space station. Inside the capsule, he conducts meetings and thinks great thoughts. But there is no evidence that these are founded upon any awareness of what is taking place in real Britain, and of what 'hard-working British families' (those people he hoped would vote for him if he gave them enough taxpayers' money) are saying to each other about him. The latest tidings of reshuffle chaos emphasise that he has even lost control of his own Cabinet.

Brown will cling to the grandeur of power until the last possible moment. He believes himself much more fit for the job than David Cameron, his despised rival. He is untroubled by embarrassment, far less a sense of personal responsibility, for the economic plight of the country. He imagines himself saving us, heedless of the fact that his policies as Chancellor have contributed mightily to this mess.

But hardly anyone else in the Cabinet, or indeed the parliamentary Labour Party, any longer believes in this administration's fitness to govern. The most startling aspect of the events of recent days and weeks has been the collapse of government confidence.

To run a country, just as to play tennis or boss a business, self-belief is indispensable. To win a match or launch a sales campaign or steer a Whitehall department, you need to be convinced that you can do it better than the competition. Suddenly, there is hardly a man or woman with keys to a Cabinet red box who possesses that assurance.

Even before today's election results have been posted, many ministers and MPs are in the mood to throw in the towel. It is important to remember how deep were the troubles of the Brown regime, before the MPs' expenses scandal was even heard of. The public finances are wrecked. Every day for months, economic commentators - around the world as well as here at home - have heaped scorn on the absence of any plausible fiscal plan for salvaging Britain's exchequer. Brown and Darling are committed to spend, spend, spend to win an election.

They offer no hint of what might happen thereafter, though we can guess, and it is not pretty. Elsewhere in government, there is a void of competence. Forget Jacqui Smith's bent housing arrangements and her husband's publicly funded taste in movie viewing. From the day Smith became Home Secretary, it was plain that she was not up to the job. The same is true of most of her Cabinet colleagues. They look what they are: tail-end charlies of an exhausted and discredited regime. The best and brightest of New Labour's people came and went years ago. Brown is pinning great hopes on his imminent reshuffle.

But who is fit to join the Cabinet, to replace the regiment of ministers who should go? There is no galaxy of bright-eyed, bushy-tailed young heroes and heroines, waiting on the backbenches for a weekend call from good old Gordon. New Labour has expended its ammunition, used up its talent. Almost all of Brown's MPs know this.

I wrote before the last election, in 2005, that there might come a time when Labour would regret winning it. Few, if any, British governments have proved able to make effective use of power for more than two terms. Harold Macmillan triumphed in the 1959 election, when the Tories had already ruled for eight years and survived the Suez disaster. But thereafter, his administration lapsed into frustration and ridicule. Margaret Thatcher's third term ended in tears, with her eviction in 1990, followed by six years of painfully limp-wristed stewardship by John Major. One of the most striking aspects of the last phase of Major's regime was a collapse of ministers' self-confidence.

By 1997, few Tories believed they deserved to beat Tony Blair's New Labour. They knew they had shot their bolt. But, even in those dark days, the Conservatives still had ministers of the calibre of Michael Heseltine, Ken Clarke, Douglas Hurd - big beasts all - occupying the top jobs.

There was nothing resembling today's shambles, with Cabinet pygmies stampeding for the exits, and the economy in tatters. Labour veteran Sir Gerald Kaufman warned in his book How To Be A Minister: 'If you are contemplating resigning your ministerial office, be entirely sure you want to go.'

Almost everyone in this Government, with the exception of the Prime Minister and his creepy crony, Ed Balls, seems desperate to be somewhere else. That even includes some ministers who have escaped unscathed from the Commons expenses scandal and whom Brown is willing to keep in their jobs. Meanwhile, Alan Johnson is widely touted as Brown's most likely successor, if there is a putsch following today's election results. Yet Johnson's most notable achievement as a minister was his surrender to the public sector unions when the Government sought to check their pension bonanza in order to make Labour's client supporters share some fraction of the private sector's sufferings.

Whether Brown or Johnson leads Labour, its credibility is irrecoverable. Of course, the Tories have their own expenses embarrassments. Their front bench includes some miserable specimens who may well prove to be the Smiths and Blearses of the future.

But only a General Election and change of government can draw a line under the sorry past and farcical present. It is absurd to suggest, as the Prime Minister did at the weekend, that he is the appropriate man to preside over reform of parliament, far less over salvaging our finances.

The statesmanlike course for Gordon Brown is to go to the country. But it would be naïve to suppose that this heroic fantasist will do any such thing. If he did, he might earn the British people's gratitude for the manner of his departure. Otherwise, he will be subjected to their anger and bitterness as we are forced to suffer another year of bungling and paralysis like the last.

It was probably inevitable that, after 12 years of office, the Labour Government should have run out of road. But the sheer indignity and chaos of this administration's predicament defies belief. Gordon Brown has lost control, and it seems fanciful to suppose he can ever get it back. The British people deserve to be delivered from a regime that has become ridiculous.
Yummy.
Link


Britain
Mass poll shows Labour wipeout across country
2008-09-21
Lest we think America has the only elections that matter ...
Gordon Brown is set to lead Labour into an election bloodbath so crushing it could take his party a decade to recover, according to the largest ever poll of marginal seats which predicts a landslide victory for David Cameron. Eight cabinet ministers, including the Home Secretary and the Justice Secretary, would be swept away in the rout as the Tories marched into Downing Street with a majority of 146, says the poll, conducted for PoliticsHome.com and exclusively revealed to The Observer. Seats that have been Labour since the First World War would fall.

The sheer scale of the humiliation is almost as bad as that endured by the Tories in 1997, suggesting it could take Labour a similar time to claw its way back to power. The party would be virtually extinguished in southern England and left with only its hardcore redoubts in northern England, the Welsh valleys and deprived inner-city areas.

The stark findings from the survey of almost 35,000 voters across 238 seats, published on the PoliticsHome website today, are likely to fuel the stalled insurrection against Brown. A third of potential Labour voters in marginal seats would be more likely to back the party if he were replaced.

Intriguingly, the findings also suggest David Miliband's hopes of leading Labour may depend on him challenging Brown before the election. While the Foreign Secretary would survive the rout, his power base would be decimated, making it much harder for him to get elected in a party likely to have shifted to the left: cabinet allies James Purnell and John Hutton would have gone, along with senior Blairites Alan Milburn and Charles Clarke. Jacqui Smith, Ruth Kelly, John Denham, Des Browne, Geoff Hoon and Jack Straw are projected to lose their seats. In Scotland, the poll predicts the SNP will win next month's Glenrothes by-election

Yesterday as MPs gathered in Manchester for the annual party conference Brown began a fightback, pledging free part-time nursery places for two-year-olds in a move towards universal childcare for pre-school children. He told the Sunday Telegraph he wanted to see 'more choice for women and for families'.

However, even as Brown was being cheered onto the conference stage, Clarke was urging MPs to confront him. In an article for the Sunday Times he said prevarication was 'actually the most dangerous course of all'.

Today's poll shows how Labour's progressive face would be scarred by the projected defeat, with women disproportionately more likely to be defeated and five of its 13 black and Asian MPs, including three ministers, voted out.

By contrast, Cameron's new intake would include a lesbian businesswoman, a 'chick-lit' novelist and a single mother turned farmer. He could claim he had transformed the Conservatives into a modern and multicultural party, potentially tripling the number of women in the ranks and adding five new ethnic minority and three openly gay MPs. It comes amid signs of clear momentum building behind Miliband, who uses an interview in October's issue of Prospect magazine - to be published during the conference - to attack the 'abuse of market power' by failing executives paying themselves unjustified salaries.

The Foreign Secretary was also boosted when the Health Secretary, Alan Johnson, his biggest rival for the leadership, publicly ruled himself out and warmly praised Miliband. In a newspaper interview yesterday, Johnson praised his younger colleague's 'common touch', adding: 'I hope he goes a long way because I'm a big fan of his.'

Brown now has a mountain to climb at a conference likely to be dominated by the twin threats of Miliband and the global banking crisis. MPs are being asked to sign a loyalty pledge circulated by the backbencher Martin Salter, while the star of The Apprentice, Sir Alan Sugar, has recorded a film urging critics to back the leader or 'have the balls to get out'.
Link


Britain
British Muslims are in 'denial' over inbreeding birth defects, says second Labour MP
2008-02-11
A second MP has waded into the controversial debate over increased birth defects in British Muslims as a result of inbreeding and claims parts of the Pakistani community are in "denial".
The genetic difference between your first cousin and your half sister is somewhere between negligible and none.
Labour's Ann Cryer, who represents Keighley in West Yorkshire, called for community leaders to encourage talks that she believed would move more families away from marriages between cousins. Her call for debate followed comments from Environment Minister Phil Woolas who said there was a "duty" to raise the issue, which was not being addressed. He insisted that the marriages - which are legal in the UK - were a cultural, not a religious, issue based in the traditions of rural parts of Pakistan. His comments were backed by Chief Whip Geoff Hoon who said there was a "particular problem" that needed expert analysis.

Today Ms Cryer backed the debate that had been started on the issue. She called on community leaders to increase awareness and claimed that the "vast majority" of trans-continental marriages in Bradford were between cousins and these could have "tragic" impacts. She first raised the issue more than two years ago after research showed British Pakistanis were 13 times more likely to have children with recessive disorders than the general population.

Steve Jones, professor of genetics at University College London, backed the calls to raise public awareness and said in general mortality and disability almost doubled among cousin marriages. Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Ms Cryer said: "The vast majority of marriages in the Muslim community in Bradford, 80% are trans-continental."The vast majority of those are to cousins. Many of those do result in either infant mortality or in recessive disorders."

Asked if the problem was recognised in the British Pakistani community she said: "They are in denial at the moment.

Read more...
Link


Africa Horn
SAS team on standby for Ethiopia rescue bid
2007-03-05
Well duh. Let's just broadcast it a little more, shall we? Follow-up on a previously posted story.
British special forces have flown to the remote area of Ethiopia where five Britons were kidnapped, defence sources said yesterday. An SAS troop trained in hostage rescue is on standby in Britain and two soldiers from the elite unit, described as being in a "liaison" role, are already on the ground. "They are looking at the ground in case they are needed," a senior defence official said yesterday.

The two women and three men were kidnapped when a gang overpowered their guards, torched the guesthouse in which they were staying and set fire to their cars on Thursday. All five are members of staff from the British embassy in Addis Ababa, relatives of diplomats or officials from the Department for International Development (DFID). Last night a spokesman for the Foreign Office said they were working round the clock to secure the release of the hostages.

A 10-strong team from the Foreign Office arrived in Addis Ababa on Saturday to assist local British embassy staff. Some were dispatched to Mekele, the nearest large town to the site of the kidnapping, and others are expected to arrive in the border area today.

An unverified report suggested a herder had spotted the Britons at an Eritrean army camp on Saturday, 20km (12 miles) from the border between the countries, suggesting that Eritrean soldiers were behind the kidnapping.
Army units kidnapping embassy staff? From where I sit, that's an act of war.
However, a spokeswoman for the Foreign Office in Addis Ababa said the kidnappers' identity was still unknown. "Our investigations are moving forward but we are still not sure who took them or where they are," she said.

The Britons, who were travelling with 13 Ethiopians, were touring the remote Afar region. Questions have been raised about why the party chose to visit an area considered to be so dangerous that the Ethiopian government requires tourists to travel with armed guards. But yesterday local tour operators said they were following a well-established tourist path that was particularly popular with French, German and Italian adventurers.
Adventurers. Stupid, bumbling adventurers.
In Hamedela, the village where the Britons were abducted, more than 100 tourists camped over Christmas and New Year, according to Tony Hickey, general manager of Ethiopian Quadrants, a local tour operator. "Afar is no more dangerous than the London underground was before the July bombings," he said.

Most tourists to the region go on organised tours, but, being resident in Ethiopia, the Britons already had vehicles and chose to arrange their own trip. They asked Mr Hickey, an expatriate Irishman who has lived in the country on and off since 1973, to find them a cook, guide and tents. He also arranged for the travel permit from the regional government. "I warned one of the [British] men that the trip was going to be tough but he said that all of them were fit and some had mountaineering experience."

The party set off in two four-wheel drive vehicles from Addis Ababa on Friday February 23, spending the night in Awash and then in the village of Serdo. At Lake Afrera, known locally as the Great Salt Lake, they picked up two armed policemen. Before scaling Erta Ale, an active volcano that last erupted in 2005, they picked up two more local militia and another guide. They returned to Hamedela on Thursday and were due to return to Mekele the following morning, and then back to the capital. When the party failed to arrive in Mekele on Thursday night the hotel contacted Mr Hickey. "They were complaining to me, asking why the guests had not checked in. That's when I realised that they were missing."

According to eyewitness accounts the Britons and around a dozen Ethiopians were woken at 2am by up to 50 men in military uniforms. They were marched away in the direction of the Eritrean border. Their wallets and phones were apparently left in the compound. The two cars were damaged by the kidnappers to ensure that they were not followed.

Foreign Office minister Geoff Hoon yesterday described the situation as "grave" but said every effort was being made to ensure the safe return of those kidnapped.
Link


Britain
Inquest Results: UK Soldier killed three days after returning armour
2006-12-12
A British soldier in Iraq was shot dead by "friendly fire" three days after he had been ordered to hand back life-saving body armour, an inquest was told yesterday. Sgt Steven Roberts, 33, was killed at a checkpoint outside the town of Az Zubayr in 2003. An Army Board of Inquiry report found that if he had not given up his enhanced body armour the bullet would not have killed him.

Yesterday's inquest heard that the sergeant and other soldiers in his tank group had accepted the body armour order because they had been told "guys on the ground needed it more than us".

The death of Sgt Roberts, of 2 Royal Tank Regiment, in such circumstances led to an outcry and calls for Geoff Hoon, the defence secretary at the time, to be sacked. Samantha Roberts, the dead man's widow, campaigned to find out the truth about his death and called for an apology from Mr Hoon for the "unfillable void" it left in her life. Before yesterday's hearing in Oxford, she said: "I'm just going to go with an open mind and see what happens."
Link


Europe
First three-way talks bring agreement on Gibraltar access
2006-09-19
A historic meeting in the Spanish city of Córdoba yesterday saw ministers from Britain and Spain sit down for the first time with political leaders from Gibraltar to resolve long-standing squabbles over the Rock. Deals over joint use of Gibraltar airport, as well as pensions, telephones, border controls and culture, were agreed by the Europe minister, Geoff Hoon, the Spanish foreign minister, Miguel Angel Moratinos, and Gibraltar's chief minister, Peter Caruana.

The key agreement involves joint use of the airport by Spain and Gibraltar, with the building of a terminal that will straddle the border zone. Passenger aircraft will soon be able to fly from Gibraltar to Spanish airports, turning Gibraltar into a regional airport. Spanish officials said that the Spanish flag would also fly on the Rock for the first time since 1954, when the dictator General Francisco Franco closed the Spanish consulate in a fit of rage over a visit by the Queen. The flag will fly outside a new branch of the Cervantes Institute, Spain's equivalent of the British Council.

The about-turn in Anglo-Spanish relations over the Rock came after the prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's socialist government dropped Spain's refusal to negotiate directly with Gibraltarians. The issue of sovereignty was left deliberately to one side in three-way talks over the past 18 months. Spain, however, has not dropped its claim to sovereignty over the two-and-a-quarter square mile colony. Spain formally ceded Gibraltar to Britain in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
EU gives Iran two weeks to clarify stance
2006-09-02
EUROPEAN Union foreign ministers agreed today to take two more weeks to try to clarify Iran's stance on halting sensitive nuclear work after Tehran ignored a UN deadline to stop uranium enrichment.

EU hapless foreign policy chief Javier Solana will meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, in Europe early next week to clear up ambiguities in Tehran's 21-page reply to a major power offer of cooperation if it stops work that could help build a bomb. Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel told Reuters after the 25 ministers discussed the issue at a meeting in Finland: "We give Solana two weeks for his clarification talks."
"And after that we shall give him another two weeks."
Mr Solana and other ministers insisted there was no deadline, but he said time was short and he would report to ministers at their next regular meeting on September 15. He said he would be talking with Larijani also on behalf of the six powers which agreed on the package of economic, technological and political incentives - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany. An EU official said there could be consultations among United Nations Security Council members before then but the Council would not formally take up the matter.

Asked when he now expected Tehran to comply with the UN resolution, Mr Solana said: "Yesterday."
Snort. Snicker. You and what army, Javier?
EU diplomats said ministers wanted to take a bit more time not so much because they believed Tehran would have a change of heart but more to show public opinion and sceptical Security Council powers Russia and China they had explored every avenue. "After what happened on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, we really have to convince people that we have gone the extra mile," one said.
Neville thought the same thing.
Ministers declined to talk publicly about what sanctions they might apply if Tehran did not comply. However, British Europe Minister Geoff Hoon said Iran had had plenty of time to respond to what he called the perfectly reasonable request and he had called for "robust action". "Despite our intensive efforts of the last six months, there has up to today unfortunately been no signal of reciprocity from Iran," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters.

But he added: "We in the EU and Germany have no interest in an escalation in the coming days and weeks due to deliberations in the Security Council."

French Europe Minister Catherine Colonna said it was important to continue the dialogue with Tehran while reminding Iran of the international community's conditions. Asked how long Iran had to comply with the Security Council's demands on its nuclear program, she said: "Rendezvous in a few days."
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
EU to commit 7,000 troops to Lebanon
2006-08-26
Follow-up to the story posted late yesterday.
The European Union is to mount the biggest military operation in its history after agreeing yesterday to commit more than 7,000 ground troops for a United Nations mission policing the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire.
They say they will, anyway.
The EU, at a meeting of its foreign ministers in Brussels, also agreed to send a further 2,000 specialist forces, mainly providing naval and air support.

Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, in Brussels to cajole hesitant countries, expressed his delight and said that more than half of the proposed 15,000-strong peacekeeping force was now in place. At a press conference, he said: "Europe is providing the backbone of the force." He added the force would be able to deploy "in days, not weeks".

Its willingness to commit troops demonstrates that the EU is capable of military deployments independent of the US. It also answers criticism from Washington that Europe is happy to engage in diplomacy but unwilling to put boots on the ground. As well as the 2,000 troops promised by the French president, Jacques Chirac, on Thursday, Italy committed 3,000, Spain up to 1,200, including a mechanised battalion, Belgium 400 barbers, Poland 500 and Finland 250.

Britain, Germany, Greece and Denmark offered to contribute to the 2,000 specialist forces. Britain, which was represented at the meeting by the Europe minister, Geoff Hoon, will provide six Jaguar aircraft, two AWACS reconnaissance planes and a frigate or destroyer, and offer the use of its air and naval base on Cyprus. The Irish government said it could not help out with the initial deployment but could provide help later.

The plan confirmed in Brussels is to have 4,000 troops - mainly a mixture of French and Italians - deployed in Lebanon by next week, with the others to follow by November.
So the Israelis will remain in southern Lebanon until November, right?
Two potential flashpoints with Israel immediately arose when Mr Annan made it plain that the UN force, despite Iraeli demands, would not disarm Hizbullah, saying this was a matter for the Lebanese, and would only police the Lebanon border with Syria if asked by the Lebanese government, which he said had made no such request.
And won't if they want to live.
Outside the EU, Turkey, China, Nepal, New Zealand and other countries are considering offering troops. Israel is opposed to troops pledged by Indonesia, Malaysia and Bangladesh, predominantly Muslim countries with which it has no diplomatic ties. The Israeli government argues their refusal to recognise its existence could mean troops would be biased against it, and would also make liaison impossible on issues such as sharing intelligence. But Mr Annan said yesterday he had received "firm commitments" from these countries.
I'll bet he did since they're pledging at the request of Hezbollah.
"It is vital that we deploy strong, credible and robust forces," Mr Annan said. "In today's world there is lots of competition for troops and there's no pool sitting in barracks. They can be deployed in a manner which does not produce tensions among the protogonists or which does not require contact with the Israelis."
Where are the mighty Uruguayans?
The secretary-general joined forces with Javier Solana, the EU's head of foreign and security policy, in demanding that Israel lift its blockade of Lebanese ports and Beirut airport at once to enable the peacekeeping forces to fulfil their mission and to allow the reconstruction of the country to begin and humanitarian aid to flow.
Particularly the 'aid' from Iran.
The Europeans are taking a considerable risk, with the ever-present danger of a strike by Israel or confrontation with Hizbullah, and a renewal of fighting with their forces caught in the middle. The EU's previous biggest operation was taking over from Nato in Bosnia in 2004: there is a 6,500-strong EU force in place. France and Italy, the two biggest troop contributors, appear to have resolved who will command the force. The UN troops on the ground will continue to be led by a French commander until the end of February when an Italian will take over.

In what was hailed as a breakthrough, the chain of command has been shortened so the UN troops' leadership will be answerable to an Italian general based in a special "cell" at UN headquarters in New York.
That's going to be a complete Charlie-Fox situation.
Link


Britain
No negotiations on Falklands: UK Foreign Minister
2006-07-10
Britain has written to the United Nations restating its sovereignty over the Falklands, as Argentina escalates attempts to gain international support for its claim over the islands. The Foreign Office has confirmed that ministers contacted the UN after counterparts in Buenos Aires managed to reopen the sovereignty issue.
I thought that was settled finally a few years back?
Officials have also written to the Organisation of American States (OAS), which last month supported talks between Britain and Argentina to solve the "Malvinas Islands" dispute peacefully. At the OAS general assembly in Santo Domingo, capital of the Dominican Republic, the organisation voted to approve an Argentine declaration to "continue exploring all possible means to solve the problem peacefully". The organisation said Argentina and Britain "must begin talks about the sovereignty dispute as soon as possible".
They're making the assumption the problem's not solved because they haven't gotten their way...
Argentine foreign minister Jorge Taiana said his country's president, Nestor Kirchner, pledged that the Argentine people were committed to winning back sovereignty of the islands as soon as possible, and would begin talks in good faith with Britain. He drove the point home during a meeting with UN secretary-general Kofi Annan. He claimed Annan had "agreed to look at" possible solutions to the disagreement." The UN's Special Committee on decolonisation subsequently adopted a draft resolution stating that "a peaceful and negotiated settlement" was the way to resolve the issue.
If the Brits own it, and the inhabitants are Brits, what's to be "peacefully negotiated"?
A Foreign Office source last night confirmed that Britain had officially objected to the resolution, and reiterated its claim over the islands.
"It's ours. Piss off."
We have a recently retired fleet aircraft carrier we could sell the Brits for $1, don't we? At least until they get theirs built.
He added: "It was not a complaint, more a statement of fact - or a restatement of everything we have been saying for decades." Foreign Office minister Geoff Hoon confirmed that the OAS had been subjected to the same no-nonsense treatment. He said: "There can be no negotiations on the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands unless and until such time as the Falkland Islanders so wish. The principle of self-determination underlies the government's position."
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More