Faheem Khalid Lodhi | Faheem Khalid Lodhi | Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah | Down Under | 20040606 | Link | ||||
Faheem Khalid Lodhi | Lashkar-e-Taiba | Afghanistan/South Asia | Australian | In Jug | 20050622 | ||||
accused of being the key Australian contact for imprisoned French terror suspect Willie Brigitte. | |||||||||
Faheem Khalid Lodhi | al-Qaeda | Down Under | 20050806 |
Europe |
Early release for bombmaker Willie Brigitte |
2009-12-01 |
![]() Caribbean-born Muslim convert Brigitte made headlines in 2007 when he was sentenced in France, following his arrest in Sydney, to a maximum nine years in jail for joining an al-Qaeda-backed Pakistani terror cell out to bomb Lucas Heights nuclear plant, the national electricity grid and/or a military base. But The Daily Telegraph can reveal that the French Justice Ministry is considering releasing the 41-year-old on an early release good behaviour plan - possibly in the new year. He is expected to immediately leave France for the Middle East, with Australia definitely off his itinerary. Authorities close to his case in Paris said the decision would no doubt cause some diplomatic ructions in Australia but that the judiciary was a separate arm of the state. The French national's lawyer Jean Claude Durimel last night confirmed the expected early release of his client. "He will be free next year, it was nine years but with good behaviour," Mr Durimel said. "Of course he is happy. He had no problem in prison, he had good behaviour and when people are of good behaviour they may leave early." Mr Durimel visited Brigitte in his maximum security cell in a complex outside Paris in the past couple of months to break the news. "He is very angry because he thinks that the Australian authorities pursued him for a political purpose. He always said he was not a terrorist and that the file was empty but for him it was a political decision and not a judicial decision," Mr Durimel said. Brigitte was born on the Caribbean island of Guadaloupe, a French territory, to affluent parents. He joined the navy in 1989 but quit four years later and moved to Paris. There he embraced a radical form of Islam and began associating with members of Algeria's Islamist extremist Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat. He ran survival training lessons in the forests outside Paris for those wishing to fight for the Taliban in Afghanistan. Twice divorced, he moved to Pakistan in 2001 following the September 11 bombings. It was there he began to train in earnest for jihad with other foreigners at a base run by the al-Qaeda-backed Lashkar-e-Toiba, as they all awaited for their instructions to attack the West. He later moved back to Paris but in May 2003 was given money and instructions to move to Sydney and make contact with an established terror cell and await further instructions. Ten days after he arrived in Sydney he married his third wife, unsuspecting army reservist and recent Muslim convert Melanie Brown. She said she only became suspicious of her husband when he continuously questioned her about her time as a signaller in East Timor, the military equipment she used and her knowledge of army bases. She later sought to downplay the admission. He moved about in Lakemba in Sydney's southwest, with authorities oblivious to his background or intent. He worked at a takeaway shop and attended a local mosque. Then he made contact with Sydney architect Faheem Khalid Lodhi. The Pakistan-born architect was central to the plot to bomb a major icon such as the nuclear plant, Pine Gap spy base in central Australia, the national electricity grid or Holsworthy barracks. The plot was in its infancy when the French authorities discovered Brigitte had travelled to Australia and requested from the Australian Embassy any details of his travel. The request was initially ignored so the French sent ASIO a message, but it was a public holiday and the fax for urgent assistance was left on a machine in Canberra. About 10 days later Brigitte was arrested on immigration irregularities and was detained - and his full background revealed. Brigitte was deported in October and during interrogation said he was trained as a bombmaker and dispatched to cause death and destruction. |
Link |
Down Under |
Judge lashed for accusing ASIO of kidnap |
2007-12-26 |
AUSTRALIA'S top legal bureaucrat has lodged a formal complaint against Justice Michael Adams, the NSW Supreme Court judge who delivered a scathing judgment that found ASIO agents had kidnapped and falsely imprisoned the Sydney medical student Izhar ul-Haque. The filing of the complaint by the secretary of the Attorney-General's Department, Robert Cornall, is a highly unusual step and follows disquiet among senior ASIO and Australian Federal Police figures about Justice Adams's verdict, which led to the high-profile terrorism case against Mr ul-Haque collapsing. His deliberations shone a spotlight on some practices of ASIO and the federal police, including a deliberate effort to use illegal tactics to coerce Mr ul-Haque into becoming an informant. ASIO and the AFP fall under the Attorney-General's Department. According to Canberra sources, the complaint was lodged with the Judicial Commission of NSW and has not been endorsed by the Rudd Government. "That's something that Cornall did on his own," one Labor source said. Complaints to the Judicial Commission are confidential but it is understood that Mr Cornall's gripes include that Justice Adams stated explicitly and without qualification that two ASIO agents had broken criminal laws. This month the ASIO director-general, Paul O'Sullivan, complained that the agents had not had a chance to rebut the charges of serious and criminal misconduct. "These officers have never had a chance to defend themselves," he said. In fact, the ASIO officers put their side of the story to Justice Adams. But he found their testimony unconvincing and, at times, untruthful. The officers confronted Mr ul-Haque at Blacktown train station in 2003 and took him by car to a park where he was warned he could do things "the easy way or the hard way". He was taken back to his house, which was being searched by more than 20 officers, and then interrogated until dawn in the presence of an AFP officer. The ASIO agents only had a search warrant. The AFP officer then turned up the next day at a formal interview where the officers began to question Mr ul-Haque about his connections with Faheem Khalid Lodhi - the Sydney architect found guilty of preparing to carry out an act of terrorism - and his visit to Pakistan. The record of this interview, and two others, were ruled inadmissible by Justice Adams due to the coercive and illegal tactics employed. Mr ul-Haque was charged with training with a terrorist group, Lashkar e Taiba - though it was not proscribed as a terrorist group at the time. Documents presented to the court showed that the AFP believed charging him would make him more likely to inform against Lodhi. A spokesman for Mr Cornall said the public servant was under no obligation to disclose whether he had made a complaint, or the reason behind such action. The Judicial Commission of NSW investigates complaints but does not discipline judicial officers. |
Link |
Down Under |
'Jihad' bomb plotter's appeal dismissed by Australian court |
2007-12-20 |
A Pakistan-born architect convicted of plotting a "jihad" or holy war bombing campaign in Australia had his appeal dismissed in a Sydney court Thursday. Faheem Khalid Lodhi was sentenced to 20 years jail in August 2006 after a jury found him guilty of planning to blow up the electrical grid in Australia's biggest city. Lodhi, who immigrated in the mid-1990s and holds Australian citizenship, was convicted of preparing for a terrorist act by seeking information about chemicals capable of making explosives. He was also found guilty of possessing a "terrorism manual" and of buying two maps of the Sydney electricity grid in preparation for a terrorist act. Lodhi denied the charges. Prosecutors linked Lodhi to Frenchman Willie Brigitte, who was deported from Australia in late 2003 and subsequently convicted in France of plotting a major attack in Sydney. Lodhi was one of the first defendants to be convicted under tough laws passed after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. His lawyers appealed on a number of grounds, arguing that the laws usurped the judiciary's role and denied him a fair trial, and that the link with Brigitte was overstated in the original court case. The full bench of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed all the appeal grounds and upheld Lodhi's sentence in a 40,000-word judgement published Thursday on the court's website. |
Link |
Down Under | ||
Terrorism accused refuse to stand | ||
2007-06-01 | ||
Nine men accused of preparing a terrorist act on Australian soil have ignited another debate, refusing to stand before the NSW Supreme Court and enter their not guilty pleas. The men, who were allegedly inspired by the September 11 attacks to plan terrorist attacks here, were brought amid tight security to the Supreme Court yesterday. They were formally arraigned, charged with conspiring to prepare a terrorist act, or acts, between July 8, 2004 and November 8, 2005. Before Justice Anthony Whealy read out the indictment to the men - many dressed in traditional Islamic robes - he asked them to stand and enter their pleas. A lawyer for some of the men, Adam Houda, said there was a problem. "The accused have a problem with standing up not to be disrespectful but it's a religious observance," Mr Houda said. Justice Whealy said he would not insist. "Judges are made of more robust material but a jury might take a different view." However, the men's stance concerned some Muslims. "[Standing up] is not out of respect for the judge, but for the institution of the court regardless of whether its Sharia or any other court," said a lawyer, Irfan Yusuf. "I can't see why these boys would have any problems. I am not aware of any mainstream religious scholars or jurists saying the accused should not stand."
The logistical problems of the trial emerged yesterday, with the realisation that jury members may need to devote much of 2008 to hear the cases against the men. Justice Whealy, who presided over the trial of Faheem Khalid Lodhi last year, set the trial down for February, saying he did not want it to spill over into 2009. | ||
Link |
Europe |
French prosecutor seeks 10 years for Willie Brigitte |
2007-02-11 |
![]() Deported from Australia in 2003 following a tip-off from the French authorities, Brigitte is charged with "criminal conspiracy in relation with a terrorist enterprise", which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. The verdict is due on March 15. "Willie Brigitte played an important role in a cell that was preparing an attack in Australia," said state prosecutor Vanessa Perree. "There is no reason that someone implicated in this type of project should be allowed to take part in French society -- although I doubt he wants to." Perree ruled out any possibility of parole for the first seven years but Brigitte's three years spent in French custody would be taken into account, meaning he could be released from 2010. Brigitte protested his innocence on Monday, saying terrorism went against the teachings of Islam, but refused to speak for the rest of the three-day trial, saying he "has lost all hope of being understood" He converted to Islam in 1998 and is alleged to have drifted quickly into radicalism, running paramilitary training camps in France to toughen up Islamist fighters, and undergoing weapons training in Pakistan. In May 2003 he is accused of travelling to Australia on the orders of Pakistani extremist group Lashkar e-Taiba to carry out an attack, whose planned targets are thought to have included a Sydney nuclear plant, the city's power grid or military installations around the country. The court heard evidence of a web of connections linking Brigitte to Lashkar e-Taiba operatives in Australia, Britain and the United States. Key to the prosecution's case is a flurry of phone calls between Brigitte and top Lashkar e-Taiba operatives in Britain and Pakistan in the days before he left for Australia, and British intelligence findings indicating the group paid for his trip. Once in Australia, Brigitte is accused of joining a cell led by a Pakistani-born radical, Faheem Khalid Lodhi, who was jailed for 20 years in 2006 over the alleged terror plot. "It was Willie Brigitte's arrival that activated the cell," the prosecutor said. According to French intelligence, Lodhi started purchasing ingredients for explosives and gathering maps and images of sensitive military sites only after Brigitte's arrival. But Brigitte's lawyer Jean-Claude Durimel said the prosecution had twisted the chronology of events, pointing out that one batch of explosives had been bought after Brigitte's arrest in Australia. He also rejected the material elements against Brigitte -- a leaflet with images of nuclear installations, and scribbled notes on how to stay concealed in public places -- as weak, saying the same evidence had been dismissed in the Australian trial of his alleged accomplice, Lodhi. "If Willie Brigitte is supposed to have prepared a terrorist attack in Australia, why didn't the Australians keep him in their country to try him? An attack requires a target -- we have been given a hypothetical list including everything from the Sydney Opera house to military bases or the 2003 Rugby World Cup. After three and half years in detention, Willie Brigitte still doesn't know the target of the attack he is accused of plotting," Durimel charged. The defence also argued that Brigitte's initial statement to French police -- saying he knew Lodhi was planning an attack but denying further involvement -- should be discounted by the judges. Brigitte later retracted his statements, saying they had been obtained under pressure, and repeated the allegation in a letter read out in court. Durimel also read a letter by Brigitte's Australian wife, a Muslim convert and former army signaller named Melanie Brown, saying she was pressured into making incriminating statements against him. She had described him to police as shifty, saying he interrogated her about her work in military encryption, and that she suspected he was involved in illegal activities. In the letter Brown said she was threatened with detention by French police when she tried to visit Brigitte in jail and had "told them what they wanted to hear". |
Link |
Europe | ||||
Willie Brigitte goes on trial for Oz plot | ||||
2007-02-07 | ||||
![]() Brigitte has been portrayed in Australia as the country's most dangerous Al-Qaeda link, suspected of plotting destruction on the scale of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. France's top anti-terrorism judge, Jean-Louis Bruguiere, who investigated the case, suspects him of setting up a terror cell in Australia on the orders of the Pakistani Islamic extremist group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
"If the Australians had concrete, converging evidence, why didn't they prosecute him themselves?" Chouet asked. "Willie Brigitte is not the case of the century and he is certainly no Islamist mastermind." However Louis Caprioli, who was head of the DST domestic intelligence agency at the time of Brigitte's arrest, said the evidence against him was solid. "One thing is certain, he wasn't in Australia for a holiday in the sun. It was an operational trip, aimed at setting up a cell with a view to carrying out attacks," he said. "To liken him to Osama bin Laden is to make him sound more important than he is, but he certainly had an important operational role." Brigitte was first spotted by French DST agents in 1998, after he converted to Islam and travelled to Yemen to attend a Koranic school seen as linked to Al-Qaeda. Back in Paris, he started attending a radical Islamist mosque, rubbing shoulders with members of the armed Algerian Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC).
There he spent five months working in a kebab shop, married an Australian Muslim convert and former army signaller, Melanie Brown, and allegedly drew up plans for his own attack. His French lawyer Jean-Claude Durimel insists his client went to Australia "for a change of life" and says there is "no material evidence" against him. "My client has never been a terrorist, he never plotted any kind of attack in Australia. The prosecution doesn't even know the target of this alleged attack: they've listed everything except the Sydney Opera House," Durimel said. The French prosecution against Brigitte was made possible by the catch-all offence of "criminal conspiracy in relation with a terrorist enterprise" -- the charge used in almost all terrorism cases in France. One of the toughest anti-terrorism laws in Europe, it gives judges wide-ranging powers of preventive arrest and detention, but has been criticised as paving the way for unfair imprisonment.
| ||||
Link |
Down Under |
Lodhi jailed over terror plot |
2006-08-23 |
![]() Justice Whealy said the attack, if carried out, "would instil terror into members of the public so that they could never again feel free from the threat of bombing attacks within Australia". The charges had carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Lodhi, 36, was convicted of three terrorism-related charges but acquitted of a fourth charge. He was convicted of acting in preparation for a terrorist act by seeking information about chemicals capable of making explosives. He was also found guilty of possessing a so-called "terrorism manual" and of buying two maps of the electricity grid, connected with preparation for a terrorist act. He had pleaded not guilty to all charges. |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Terror in Mumbai threatens us all |
2006-07-13 |
Pakistan must stop harbouring terrorists to be a true ally THE seven blasts that ripped through Mumbai's commuter rail system during the Tuesday evening peak hour, killing at least 190 people and wounding countless others, were more than just the worst terrorist atrocity India has suffered in more than a decade. Beyond maiming and killing innocent civilians on the way home from work, the co-ordinated attacks were a dagger aimed at the heart of the world's largest democracy and one of the most open and rapidly growing states in the developing world. The financial hub of a Western-oriented democracy with especially close ties to the English-speaking world, Mumbai should be remembered along with London, Madrid, New York and Washington as a city that has been stricken by the nihilist madness that is 21st-century terrorism. Although no one has yet claimed responsibility, all indicators suggest the attacks were carried out by a Pakistan-based and al-Qa'ida linked group such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (or Army of the Faithful), possibly in conjunction with the local Student Islamic Movement of India. India is home to the world's second-largest Muslim population after Indonesia, and this minority group harbours a series of grievances that range from perceptions of discrimination to anger over India's sovereignty over the northern provinces of Jammu and Kashmir. But regional events may have provided the trigger to the attacks. While the country already has a handful of paramilitary police stationed in Afghanistan, the Government of Manmohan Singh is debating sending troops to that country under the banner of NATO. This possibility infuriates Pakistanis, who are loath to see Indian troops stationed on both its eastern and western fronts. And the prospect of Hindu Indian soldiers fighting fundamentalist Taliban insurgents is anathema to radical Muslims. SIMI and other associated Islamic radicals have carried out a series of attacks in India over the past decade, including last year's bombings in New Delhi, which killed 60 people. Assuming that Lashkar-e-Taiba or one of its affiliates were responsible, yesterday's bombings highlight the two-faced nature of the Pakistani regime and its relations with the West, particularly Washington. While on the one hand, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has been a valuable ally in the war on terror, his regime has all too often provided succour to Islamic terrorists. He has done little to smash local terrorist infrastructure such as training camps and madrassas. The Taliban is reasserting itself in Afghanistan now precisely because it was able to regroup in Pakistan. And Osama bin Laden is thought to still be hiding within Pakistan's borders. Yesterday's attacks make it all the more incumbent for the world community, and in particular the US, to take a much firmer line with Pakistan. Australia has a stake in this as well: Lashkar-e-Taiba has made repeated attempts to infiltrate this country and has close links with Southeast Asian jihadi groups. While the group has at its foundations grievances over Kashmir, from the mid-1990s it morphed into a more sinister organisation that sees itself as an arrowhead for al-Qa'ida's worldview determined to take the fight to non-believers wherever they might be including Australia. Australian-born Guantanamo Bay inmate David Hicks joined Lashkar-e-Taiba before taking up arms with the Taliban. Convicted would-be terrorist Faheem Khalid Lodhi is said to have acted as Lashkar-e-Taiba's "quartermaster" for foreign troops at its camps in the mountains of Pakistan, and a Sydney medical student currently faces charges of having trained with the group. And when French terror suspect Willie Brigitte came to Sydney in 2003 to meet Lodhi and activate a sleeper cell, it was allegedly at the behest of a Lashkar-e-Taiba official named Sajid. As horrific as the scenes of carnage were, yesterday's bombings must not be allowed to derail India's progress as one of the most promising nations in the developing world. Although still desperately poor in many ways, India's economy is growing at 8.1 per cent annually the second-highest rate of any major economy and is home to a thriving middle class. India's vibrant and open political culture is a living rebuke to everyone who says democracy is incompatible with economic development. This fact punches an irreparable hole in the sneakily racist argument mounted by many progressives opposed to toppling Saddam Hussein, namely that democracy cannot take root in non-Western cultures. Economically, India boasts a vast entrepreneurial class that has forced the Government to embrace reform. Besides being "the world's back office" India is home to vast numbers of competitive private enterprises and a modern financial sector. John Howard rightly condemned the attacks as "an attack on the democratic way of life". And Foreign Minister Alexander Downer has pledged intelligence and forensic investigation resources to the Indian Government. This is a good start. But Australia can do more to come to India's aid. For too long, General Musharraf has been allowed to walk both sides of the street in the war on terror and to claim that essentially his country is in such a bad way that any improvement should result in Western reward. In the wake of the Mumbai outrage, that is no longer acceptable. Australia should bring diplomatic weight to bear on Pakistan, both directly and by encouraging the US to do likewise, to clean up its act and crack down on the likes of Lashkar-e-Taiba. |
Link |
Terror Networks |
Clear case of misplaced sympathy |
2006-07-03 |
David Hicks's supporters are in denial about the nature of his actions, writes Gerard Henderson. IT'S all but official. The United States, on George Bush's watch, is not a fascist state, despite what some Bush critics allege. The decision of the US Supreme Court in Hamdan v Rumsfeld, handed down last week, shows that the rule of law still prevails in the US democracy. In Hamdan's case, by a majority of five to three, the court found against the Bush Administration's attempted use of military commissions to try detainees held at Guantanamo Bay who have been charged with crimes. The majority comprised Justices John Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Ginsburg, Stephen Breyerand Anthony Kennedy. Stevens, Souter and Kennedy were appointed by Republican administrations. Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito delivered dissenting opinions. All three were also appointed by Republican administrations. This is not the first time the Supreme Court has found against the Bush Administration. Bush is an authoritative President, but even at a time of war he is limited by the US constitution. Salim Hamdan's case has uncertain implications for South Australian-born David Hicks, who has been held at Guantanamo Bay for more than four years. As is often the case in the US legal system, this matter has dragged on for far too long, partly due to delays caused by legal actions taken by defendants and partly due to a slow prosecution process. Unfortunately, an unintended result of Hamdan's case may be to further delay legal action against Hicks and others. As the Labor frontbencher Nicola Roxon warned on Friday, "the last thing we want to do is to turn someone like David Hicks into a martyr". Already there is considerable support for Hicks in Australia from those who maintain he has been denied due process. This is an informal group which includes many lawyers and journalists and a few academics along with some politicians. Among the latter group, Hicks's cause is most frequently annunciated by the minor parties (Democrats, Greens) and independents, but some Labor MPs are also vocal on the issue. In his chapter in Coming to the Party (MUP, 2006), Barry Jones argues that the ALP should embrace the Hicks cause (among others), lest it appear to be "safe, simple, bland". It is not clear how such a position is consistent with the point made by Jones on television on Sunday that Labor's essential task is to win more seats in such states as Queensland, Western Australia, NSW and South Australia - especially since the first two states are more sensitive than most to national security issues, in view of their relative isolation. There are not many votes in proclaiming the rights of someone who is alleged to have trained with al-Qaeda. Certainly, Hicks is entitled to a fair hearing in the US in accordance with legal process. What's more, there is evidence his incarceration is unduly harsh. But this is no reason to go into denial about Hicks's actions, which have directly led to his predicament. Interviewed on ABC TV's Lateline on Friday, Major Michael Mori - Hicks's US military lawyer - said his client "hasn't injured anyone" and "is not a killer". How does he know this? Ironically, the case against Hicks is spelt out in The President Versus David Hicks, which aired on SBS TV in 2004. The film's directors, Curtis Levy and Bentley Dean, went out of their way to present the case for Hicks, but the tactic backfired due to the decision to quote some of Hicks's letters to his father, Terry Hicks. In August 2000 Hicks told his father of his time training with the Islamist terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba on the Pakistan side of the Kashmir line of control: "Every night there is an exchange of fire. I got to fire hundreds of rounds There are not many countries in the world where a tourist can go and stay with the army and shoot across the border at its enemy, legally." Hicks was not firing at bats. If he did not kill or injure anyone, it can only be because he missed his targets. Elsewhere Hicks said he was "officially a Taliban member", advocated the implementation of "strict Islamic law" including the "death sentence" and "all Islamic punishments", proclaimed the need for "an Islamic revolution", railed against "the Western-Jewish domination" and celebrated beheadings in poetry: "Muhammad's food you shall be fed/To disagree, so off with your head." There is a tendency among some Western commentators not to take self-proclaimed revolutionaries seriously. In a sense, revolutionaries, including those of the Islamic genre, deserve more respect. The events in the US of September 11, 2001, and in Britain on July 7 last year indicate that Islamist revolutionaries - whether on tourist visas or citizens - are intent on destroying Western and Muslim societies. The details are set out in The 9/11 Commission Report and the Report of the Official Account of the Bombings in London on 7th July 2005. Since then there have been serious allegations of planned terrorist attacks on Canada and New Zealand. In recent times, juries in Australia have found Faheem Khalid Lodhiand Joseph "Jihad Jack" Thomas guilty of terrorist offences under the new legislation introduced after the events of September 11. Jack Roche pleaded guilty to terrorist offences under the previous legislation. Others have been charged and are awaiting trial. Lex Lasry, QC, maintained that Thomas was the victim of a "trophy trial". After the jury had found the accused guilty of accepting funds from a terrorist organisation, Justice Philip Cummins dismissed Lasry's assertion. The judge said "al-Qaeda was not a charitable organisation; it was not a travel agency". In a recent plea for Thomas on ABC Radio National's Perspectives program, Anna Sande said her friend "was a young man in the wrong place at the wrong time, but not for the wrong reasons". A jury thought otherwise. Sande raised concern about Thomas's mental health and the costs that his parents have endured in supporting his legal defence. The former is a matter of real concern. Yet the latter could be resolved by well-off lawyers and other professionals taking the hat around to assist the Thomas family. As with Hicks, the supporters of Thomas would have more credibility if they openly acknowledged that training or associating with al-Qaeda is a serious matter. Gerard Henderson is executive director of the Sydney Institute. |
Link |
Down Under |
Lodhi sentence 'should punish' |
2006-06-29 |
THE aim in sentencing convicted terrorist Faheem Khalid Lodhi should be to punish, deter and incapacitate, a Sydney court has been told. The sentence should "secure the proper measure of protection for society", Crown Prosecutor Richard Maidment SC told Lodhi's sentencing hearing in the NSW Supreme Court today. Lodhi was convicted last week of three terrorism offences, one of which carries a maximum life sentence. The 36-year-old architect was accused of planning to bomb the national electricity supply system in the cause of violent jihad, or holy war. A jury found him guilty of acting in preparation for a terrorist act, by seeking information about chemicals capable of making explosives in October 2003, an offence carrying a maximum penalty of life in prison. The Pakistani-born Australian citizen also was found guilty of possessing a 15-page "terrorism manual" with recipes for poisons and explosives, and of buying two maps of the electricity grid, connected with preparation for a terrorist act. The two offences each attract maximum 15-year jail terms. Making submissions to Justice Anthony Whealy, Mr Maidment did not specify what sentence the Crown was seeking. But he said the sentence should "act as a real and significant deterrent to others" and "secure the proper measure of protection for society". There was little local authority on sentencing for terrorism offences, as "these are the first convictions on these offences that have occurred in Australia", Mr Maidment said. But he referred Justice Whealy to an English judgment involving an IRA terrorist, which stated the court's object was to punish, to deter and to incapacitate, with the need for rehabilitation playing a minor role, if any. "We submit that these are principles which your honour should adopt," Mr Maidment said. He said Lodhi had inquired about buying chemicals capable of making explosives that could have caused "very substantial damage to property, and potentially the death of many people". He said that although the location, timing, precise target and participants in the terrorist act may not have been decided, Lodhi "was central to the scheme". Lodhi had shown no remorse, his plan was premeditated and he had acted surreptitiously, Mr Maidment said. His object was "to strike terror amongst members of the community ... so that they should not feel free from the threat of a bombing attack within Australia". |
Link |
Down Under | |
Lodhi convicted of three terror charges | |
2006-06-19 | |
![]() The national electricity supply system or three Sydney defence sites Victoria Barracks, HMAS Penguin or Holsworthy Barracks were his possible targets, the jury was told. Lodhi inquired about chemicals capable of making explosives, and had instructions for making explosives, detonators and poisons, in preparation for a terrorist attack. He was also charged with acquiring two maps of the electricity grid and 38 aerial photographs of military sites connected with preparation for a terrorist act. Lodhi, a Pakistani-born Australian citizen, denied the charges, rejecting as absurd allegations he was planning a terrorist attack, or that he believed in violent jihad.
The jury of six men and six women spent five days deliberating before finding Lodhi guilty of three charges relating to the maps, chemical inquiries and instructions. However, he was acquitted of the fourth charge, with the jury finding he had not downloaded the aerial photographs for a purpose connected with terrorism. Lodhi is the first person to be convicted of a charge of preparing for a terrorist act, an offence which carries a maximum life sentence. Justice Anthony Whealy remanded Lodhi in custody to face sentencing submissions on June 29. | |
Link |
Down Under |
Terror suspect denies 'pack of lies' |
2006-05-23 |
SYDNEY terrorist suspect Faheem Khalid Lodhi today denied he was telling "a pack of lies" at his NSW Supreme Court trial. The 36-year-old architect is accused of planning to bomb the national electricity system or Sydney defence sites. He has pleaded not guilty to four terrorism-related charges. In October 2003, Lodhi allegedly inquired about buying chemicals capable of making explosives in preparation for a terrorist act. The jury has heard that when ASIO raided his office later that month, they found 15 pages of handwritten notes containing recipes for explosives, including urea nitrate. The prosecution has described the document as a "terrorism manual". Lodhi told the court he was planning to export chemicals to make detergents, and had forgotten about the notes at the time he inquired about chemical prices. During cross-examination, Crown Prosecutor Richard Maidment SC suggested Lodhi was trying to disguise the fact that he wanted to buy urea and nitric acid, two ingredients of urea nitrate. "Your story to the jury about your interest in manufacturing detergents is a load of rubbish ... you had in mind to prepare for a terrorist act," Mr Maidment said. "No, it's not right," Lodhi said. Lodhi told the court he had copied the information in the handwritten notes three or four years before the ASIO raid, from a website he stumbled across while using a computer at Sydney University. He said he spent one or two hours copying down the information, which he translated from English into his native language, Urdu. Lodhi said he looked at the website out of curiosity and had "foolishly" written down some of the information he found. He denied writing in Urdu to disguise the information or because he had "a guilty conscience" about the contents. Lodhi said he had not intended to keep the document and never even thought about using it. "I suggest that your story about finding this accidentally on the Internet ... is a load of rubbish," Mr Maidment said. "No, it's true," Lodhi replied. "You're telling the jury a pack of lies, aren't you?" Mr Maidment asked. "No, it's true," Lodhi said. Mr Maidment suggested Lodhi's evidence was "absolutely made up from start to finish", to cover up the fact that he had the notes "for a purpose connected with the preparation for an act of terrorism". Lodhi denied it. The trial continues before Justice Anthony Whealy. |
Link |