Home Front: Culture Wars |
And Watada Out Of Here |
2009-10-04 |
An Army lieutenant who refused to deploy to Iraq in 2006, saying he believed the war was illegal, has officially left the service. Fort Lewis spokesman Joseph Piek confirmed that Ehren Watada was discharged Friday. Watada was charged with missing his unit's deployment and with conduct unbecoming an officer for denouncing President Bush and the war - statements he made while explaining his actions. His court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007. The Army wanted to try him in a second court-martial, but a federal judge said a second trial on key charges, including missing troop movement, would violate Watada's constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. Watada lawyer Kenneth Kagan said last week that the Army had finally allowed his client to resign. Kagan added that Watada was granted a discharge "under other than honorable conditions." |
Link |
Fifth Column |
Lt. Watada Might Not Get Out Of The Military Until 2018(?) |
2008-06-08 |
It was two years ago yesterday that 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, a 1996 Kalani High School graduate, declared publicly that he would not deploy to Iraq with his Stryker brigade combat team. Today, Watada is still in the Army working at a desk job at Fort Lewis, Wash., while his case is tied up in federal court. Ken Kagan, Watada's attorney, told the Star-Bulletin that federal judge Benjamin Settle in Tacoma will probably take up the matter early this fall. In November, Settle ruled that no court-martial will be held for Watada pending the outcome of his claim that it would violate his Fifth Amendment rights by trying him twice for the same charges. Watada, who contends the war is illegal, is charged with missing his unit's deployment to Iraq on June 22, 2006, and with conduct unbecoming an officer for denouncing President Bush and the war. If convicted, he could be sentenced to six years in prison and be dishonorably discharged. Since then, his unit fought in Iraq for 18 months and returned in October Kagan said he expects the case to eventually go before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals where it may take up to three years before a decision is rendered. "Our experience has shown us that 9th Circuit matters consume somewhere between 18 months to three years," Kagan said. "I don't know of any reason they would put it on some fast track." Watada's first court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007. Settle wrote that the military judge likely abused his discretion in declaring the mistrial. Watada's term of service in the military ended December 2006, but the legal proceedings have prevented his discharge. |
Link |
Home Front: Politix |
Judge halts Iraq war |
2007-10-07 |
TACOMA, Wash. - A federal court judge has temporarily blocked a court-martial scheduled to start Tuesday for an Iraq war objector based at Fort Lewis. First Lt. Ehren Watada is charged with refusing to deploy to Iraq. His lawyers argue the Army is violating his constitutional rights by trying him twice for the same crime. U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle A Bush appointee (June 07) ruled he has jurisdiction to issue the stay and that Watada's double-jeopardy claim is not frivolous. This is a remarkably clear case of an egregious violation of the double-jeopardy clause, Watadas lawyers, James Lobsenz and Kenneth Kagan, wrote in an emergency motion to block the court-martial. Watada has said the war is illegal and that he would be party to war crimes if he served in Iraq. Don't forget that he enlisted after the war started. He knew what he was getting into. The Army, which refused his request to be posted in Afghanistan or elsewhere, declared his first court-martial a mistrial in February, over the lieutenants objections. The Army Court of Criminal Appeals has ruled that Watada can be court-martialed again, but Watada appealed that decision to the U.S. Circuit Court for the Armed Forces, which has not ruled, his attorneys wrote. And then he, at the same time, appealed to this Federal judge? Watadas attorneys also asked that he be allowed to leave the Army. Watadas term of service ended in December, but the pending legal proceedings have prevented his discharge. He lives in Olympia and continues to perform administrative duties at Fort Lewis, south of Seattle. Hopefully just shuffling papers of a non-important matter. I wouldn't trust him to handle my toilet paper. The only reason hes still in the Army is that the Army will not let him leave while theres discipline pending, Kagan said. Wouldn't the military lose jurisdiction if they cut him loose? The government has followed the law and rules throughout the process of bringing this case to trial, the Army said in a statement released by Fort Lewis spokesman Joe Piek. The U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals in Ballston, Va., determined that this case was not prohibited by double jeopardy and may properly proceed to trial. The Court issued its ruling after considering comprehensive briefs and arguments from the parties. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT | ||
Watada Charged Again | ||
2007-02-24 | ||
![]() ``We're back to square one,'' Fort Lewis spokeswoman Leslie Kaye said. Watada's first trial began early this month but ended abruptly when the judge, Lt. Col. John Head, said he did not believe the soldier fully understood a pretrial agreement he signed admitting elements of the charges. As part of that agreement, the Army dropped two of the charges against him, lowering his potential sentence to four years. Watada's attorney, Eric Seitz, said he would seek to have the charges dismissed as a violation of the Constitution's protection against double jeopardy. ``When it's not going well for you, you can't just call a mistrial and start over again,'' Seitz said. ``No matter how much lip service they give to wanting to protect my client's rights, that just doesn't exist in the military courts.''
Watada faces one charge of missing movement and another of conduct unbecoming of an officer. The latter charge accuses him in four instances of making public statements criticizing the war or President Bush. Watada freely admitted missing the deployment and making the statements in the pretrial agreement. Before the mistrial was declared, he had planned to take the witness stand to argue that his motives were to avoid committing war crimes by participating in an illegal war.
| ||
Link |
Home Front: WoT | ||
Mistrial Declared In Watada Court Martial | ||
2007-02-08 | ||
![]()
FORT LEWIS, Wash. -- The judge overseeing the court martial of an Army lieutenant who refused to deploy to Iraq declared a mistrial Wednesday, saying the soldier did not fully understand a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges. Military judge Lt. Col. John Head announced the decision after 1st Lt. Ehren Watada said he never intended to admit he had a duty to go to Iraq with his fellow soldiers -- one element of the crime of missing troop movement. Head set a March 12 date for a new trial and dismissed the jurors. Last month, Watada signed a 12-page stipulation of fact in which he acknowledged he did not go to Iraq with his unit, the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, last June. He also acknowledged making public statements criticizing the Iraq war, which he believes to be illegal. In exchange, prosecutors dropped two charges of conduct unbecoming an officer charges against him, and agreed to proceed to trial on the remaining charges: missing movement -- for his refusal to deploy last June -- and two other allegations of conduct unbecoming an officer for comments made about the case. I wonder of the two charges will be re-filed then. Watada, 28, of Honolulu, was expected to testify in his own defense Wednesday until Head and attorneys met in a closed meeting for much of the morning. In their opening statements Tuesday, prosecutors said Watada abandoned his soldiers and brought disgrace upon himself and the service by accusing the Army of war crimes and denouncing the Bush administration for conducting an illegal war founded on lies. Watada could receive four years in prison and a dishonorable discharge if convicted of missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer for his statements against the war. Watada is the first commissioned officer to be court-martialed for refusing to go to Iraq, said Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice in Washington, D.C. After concluding the Iraq war was illegal, Watada asked to take a combat post in Afghanistan or elsewhere. The Army refused those requests, along with Watada's request that he be allowed to resign. Sorry - you can't pick and choose which conflict you get to play in. Watada then made several public appearances to denounce the war. Thus the conduct charges....
| ||
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Mistrial Declared in Court Martial of Officer Who Refused Iraq Deployment |
2007-02-07 |
FORT LEWIS, Wash. The judge overseeing the court martial of an Army lieutenant who refused to deploy to Iraq declared a mistrial Wednesday, saying the soldier did not fully understand a document he signed admitting to elements of the charges. Military judge Lt. Col. John Head announced the decision after 1st Lt. Ehren Watada said he never intended to admit he had a duty to go to Iraq with his fellow soldiers one element of the crime of missing troop movement. Actually the last part of the last sentence is not true. It's not an element in his crime of refusing to follow a lawful order. One person interviewed, I wish I could remember names, set this trial up as a political trial. He said, "Lt. Watada made a political descision and now must face the political consequences. Horsepookey. This is not a political issue but now the left is making it one. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
Court-martial for Watada, Fort Lewis officer |
2007-02-06 |
![]() FORT LEWIS, Wash. (AP) - The judge in the case against the first U.S. officer court-martialed for refusing to ship out for Iraq barred several experts in international and constitutional law from testifying Monday about the legality of the war. Because this isn't an international or consitutional case 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, 28, of Honolulu, is charged with missing movement for refusing to ship out with his unit, the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. He also faces charges of conduct unbecoming an officer for accusing the Army of war crimes and denouncing the administration for conducting an "illegal war" founded on "lies." As the court-martial got under way, military judge Lt. Col. John Head excluded virtually all the planned defense witnesses. Head previously ruled that Watada's attorney, Eric Seitz, could not debate the legality of the Iraq war in court. No Soapbox for YOU!!! If convicted, Watada could receive four years in prison and a dishonorable discharge. He has requested that his case be heard by a military panel of officers, the equivalent of a jury. hmmm... I've heard this was a dumb idea... At one point, Seitz suggested Head could be committing judicial misconduct if he denied Seitz an opportunity to ask panel members biographical questions to determine any bias. "If you are going to tie my hands and you are going to script these proceedings, then in my view we're all wasting our time," Seitz said. I WANT MY SOAPBOX! GIMME! GIMME! GIMME! The judge said Seitz would be allowed time to question panel members individually. Panel selection began in the afternoon, with the defense and prosecution questioning a pool of 10 officers: a colonel, two lieutenant colonels, three majors and four captains. Seitz appeared intent on discovering whether any members had any preconceived notions on officers who have refused to deploy with their units, and based on that, whether they felt any soldier who did should be removed from the military. In addition to questions about their educational background and hobbies, Seitz asked what, if anything, they had read or seen about Watada's case and whether they would be compelled to administer a certain kind of punishment based solely on the charges if his client were to be convicted. Potential panel members also were asked if there was anything about Watada's actions that, given their own experience, would affect their ability to remain impartial while hearing the case. Ultimately, seven of the officers were selected to serve on the panel. Although other officers have refused to deploy to Iraq, Watada is the first to be court-martialed. In 2005, Army Sgt. Kevin Benderman, an enlisted man, served 13 months in prison and was given a dishonorable discharge after refusing to go to Iraq. Stupid reporter. Even I know 'enlisted man' != 'Officer' Outside the base, a small group that included actor Sean Penn demonstrated in support of Watada. A few others demonstrated against him, including one man who carried a sign calling Watada a "weasel." Watada, who joined the Army in March 2003, has called the Iraq war "a horrible breach of American law" and said he has a duty to refuse illegal orders. I mean like I thought we were going to pick flowers or something...... Army prosecutors have argued that Watada's behavior was dangerous to the mission and morale of soldiers in Iraq. "He betrayed his fellow soldiers who are now serving in Iraq," Capt. Dan Kuecker said at one hearing. On Tuesday, prosecutors were expected to call on at least three witnesses as they try to prove that Watada's speech amounted to misconduct. Seitz said late Monday he would call two witnesses, Watada and a character witness, an Army captain who has known Watada for about two years. The captain has been brought back from service in Iraq to testify, the lawyer said. Might be entertaining watching him get shot down when he tries to use the proceeding as a soapbox. |
Link |
Fifth Column | |||||
Watada court-martial to start tomorrow | |||||
2007-02-04 | |||||
![]()
"I could never conceive of our leader betraying the trust we had in him. As I read about the level of deception the Bush administration used to initiate and process this war, I was shocked. I became ashamed of wearing the uniform. If the president can betray my trust, it's time for me to evaluate what he's telling me to do," Watada said, according to the court martial charge sheet.
Watada joined the army in 2003 and was posted in South Korea until 2005, when he was transferred to Fort Lewis to prepare for deployment to Iraq.
His case has garnered significant support in a nation that has turned sharply against the Iraq war. Mike Honda, a member of the US House of Representatives, told the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper last week that Watada volunteered for the military in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks "out of a desire to protect his family and compatriots." Noting Watada's "exemplary" service record, Honda defended his act: "Watada is not alone. Poll after poll points to an ever-rising tide of public opposition to President Bush's handling of the war in Iraq."
But he said the court martial will avoid the issues his refusal was aimed at raising. "In this case, the judge has already predetermined that he will not allow any evidence or witnesses to testify that the war is illegal or immoral. He has already predetermined that the order (to deploy) is lawful and, in a sense by charging me with missing movement, they are skirting the issue of the legality of the order."
| |||||
Link |
Fifth Column |
Iraq war objector faces new charge for remarks in Seattle speech |
2006-09-17 |
![]() In the speech, the 28-year-old artillery officer repeated his opposition to the war and called on deployed soldiers to refuse to fight. A videotape of the speech was played at an Army hearing Aug. 17 into the evidence against Watada. The lieutenants attorney, Eric Seitz, characterized the additional charge as further evidence of the Armys intent to silence his client. Thats what theyve been trying to do from the beginning, Seitz said. He said Watada would continue to appear at some limited speaking engagements. An Army officer who reviewed the evidence recommended Watada be court-martialed for missing his units movement to Iraq, two counts of making contemptuous statements about President Bush, and three counts of conduct unbecoming an officer. The Fort Lewis commanding general, Lt. Gen. James Dubik, has not yet announced whether hell order Watada to be court-martialed. If convicted of the original six charges and the seventh, Watada would face up to eight years in prison, Fort Lewis spokesman Joseph Piek said. Here's hoping he goes eight-for-eight. No parole for federal offenses, too. Welcome to Kansas. |
Link |
Fifth Column | |||
Nine Japanese Americans Veterans Groups Criticize Watada | |||
2006-08-24 | |||
Nine Japanese American veterans groups have publicly criticized Army 1st Lt. Ehren Watada for his decision to disobey deployment orders to serve in Iraq. Watada, an officer based at Fort Lewis, is trying to "make himself a martyr and a hero," said Robert Wada, a charter president of the Japanese American Korean War Veterans. He said Watada's actions disrespect a legacy of military service by Japanese American soldiers dating back to World War II. "No Japanese Americans did anything like that, and that is why Japanese Americans are so upset," Wada said. "He is doing something that has never been done by Japanese Americans."
Watada, 28, from Hawaii, refused to deploy to Iraq on June 22 with his unit. He is now awaiting the finding of a hearing held last week that could lead to his court-martial on charges of conduct unbecoming an officer, missing troop movement and contempt toward officials. "No one refused to go just because they didn't believe in the war," Wada said. "We went to Korea, and we didn't know what the hell we were there for. ... But nobody refused to go." That's not exactly the case, said Seattle resident Frank Abe. He produced "Conscience and the Constitution," a documentary about Japanese Americans who resisted the World War II draft because they and their families were held in internment camps for years after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941. Wada is "overlooking the fact that 315 Japanese Americans in World War II resisted the draft as a means of protesting the forced incarceration of their families," Abe said Wednesday. "They took a principled stand. These nisei, these second-generation Japanese Americans, were willing to serve in the armed forces, but only after their constitutional rights were restored," he said.
Bob Watada, the lieutenant's father, said his son is grateful for the veterans who fought in previous wars and he isn't dishonoring their legacy. "My son is doing the same thing, fighting for the Constitution, fighting to preserve civil liberties," Bob Watada said. "He is standing up for our Constitution and all the principles it stands for."
The groups opposing Watada include the Japanese American Korean War Veterans, Americans of Japanese Ancestry WWII Memorial Alliance, five Veterans of Foreign Wars posts and American Legion post and the Nisei Veterans Coordinating Council of Southern California. "He is also similar because he looks sort of Japanese and has a Japaneezy sort of name. He has also been observed eating sushi." | |||
Link |
Home Front: WoT | |
Army charges officer for refusing to fight in Iraq | |
2006-07-06 | |
![]() In a statement, the Army said it had charged Watada, 28, with missing movement, contempt toward officials and conduct unbecoming an officer. "Officers are held to a high moral and legal standard. Acts contrary to this standard may be tried by court-martial," said the Army statement. If found guilty of all charges, Watada could face several years in confinement, dishonorable discharge and forfeiture of pay, according to the Army. The missing movement charge carries the heaviest punishment of confinement of up to two years. Watada's lawyer said he expected the missing movement charge, but was somewhat surprised by the decision to charge the officer with contempt toward officials and conduct unbecoming an officer, because it raises free speech issues. "What he said about the war and the way the war began and the misrepresentations by the Bush administration are all true. Not only does he have a right to make those statements, he has an obligation to make those statements," said Eric Seitz, Watada's Honolulu-based attorney.
| |
Link |
Iraq |
First (only) U.S. Army Officer (Lt.) Refuses To Deploy To Iraq |
2006-06-07 |
![]() Lt. Ehren Watada of the Stryker Brigade writes, "I refuse to be silent any longer. I refuse to watch families torn apart, while the President tells us to stay the course. I refuse to be party to an illegal and immoral war against people who did nothing to deserve our aggression. "I wanted to be there for my fellow troops. But the best way was not to help drop artillery and cause more death and destruction. It is to help oppose this war and end it so that all soldiers can come home." - signed LT. His name had been kept a secret until now, but Lt. Watada's father confirms that his son is taking this bold step and told the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper that he's proud of his son. |
Link |