Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Home Front: Culture Wars
Kommies get their just deserts 31 years later
2018-09-12
by Noemie Emery

[WashingtonExaminer] Are you happy now, Teddy Kennedy? Are you happy, Joe Biden? Are you happy now, Harry Reid? It’s due to the things that you did and said that Donald J. Trump is now naming his second Supreme Court justice in under two years in office. It is your fault that the once courtly process of Supreme Court appointments turned into the blood-and-thunder-eye-gouging drama that we hate and we live through today.

It was 31 years ago, in 1987, that Edward M. Kennedy burst on the floor of the Senate to tell us all that with Robert Bork on the Supreme Court, “women would be forced Into back-alley abortions,” blacks would eat at segregated lunch counters, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the government, and the freedom of millions would hang by a thread.

Before it was over, liberals would raise and spend over $10 million in negative ads (quite a sum at the time) and in lobbying efforts. They would threaten black witnesses with career-ending reprisals and seize and search records of video rentals for signs of blue movies that were never found.

As Steve Hayward says, “The demagogic nature of the public campaign against him made it a watershed moment in American politics, permanently deforming the nomination process as for the judiciary, with ideological battles now extending to the lower federal courts as well.” How true this was proven in 1991, when Kennedy’s office unleashed Anita Hill upon Clarence Thomas, though with less success.

And in 1992, Biden averred that if a vacancy occurred in the Supreme Court before the presidential election, the Democratic Senate should refuse to let Republican President George H.W. Bush fill it until the election was over, so that the new president (who would be Bill Clinton) could decide.

Twenty-four years later, in 2016, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died of a heart attack, and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell took this advice. He refused to allow a vote on a nominee picked by an exiting Democrat. Democrats fumed, but, as they expected a President Hillary Clinton, they bided their time.

Picture their rage when Trump was elected, bringing not only himself but a procession of judges whom a Republican Senate would rush to confirm. The first pick, Neil Gorsuch, did not change the court’s balance, and Democrats would have done better to put up a fight on the second one, which would. But their anger and shock knew no bounds.

In 2013, in a fit of pique at GOP opposition, Majority Leader Harry Reid had blown up the 60-vote rule for non-Supreme Court nominations, reducing the threshold to a simple majority vote. “You will regret this,” McConnell had said at the time, and he would be prescient. Democrats went to war, and McConnell went nuclear, later blowing up the 60 vote rule for Supreme Court nominations — just as Hillary Clinton’s running mate had promised to do after she won in 2016.

Now Democrats need that judicial filibuster, and it’s no longer there for them, lost in the rubble they helped to create.

Pity the Democrats. Thirty-one years of blood, sweat, and tears in which they sacrificed all to the abortion rights movement, uprooting rule after rule and norm after norm, laying waste to the rules of Supreme Court selection in the interests of what remains a fringe issue.

All that, and they ended up even further behind than they were when they started, with Trump and Mike Pence in positions of power, about to cement a conservative Supreme Court majority for who knows how many more years. One could feel sorry for them, if only they didn't so richly deserve this comeuppance.

Do you feel better, Robert Bork, now that justice has triumphed? Happy now, Kennedy; and Biden, and Reid?
Link


Home Front: Politix
‘Year of the Woman' senators condemn sexual harassment, campaigned for Ted Kennedy
2017-11-20
[Wash Times] Sen. Patty Murray was quick to condemn Sen. Al Franken last week after he was accused of sexual harassment, but she took the opposite tack 24 years ago with another Democratic senator dogged by accusations of lecherous behavior.

She and the four other Democratic women serving in the Senate after the widely hailed 1992 "Year of the Woman" election used their newfound clout to come to the rescue of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy as reports of drunken debauchery threatened to sink his re-election bid.

At a Boston fundraiser on Nov. 15, 1993, Ms. Murray was joined by fellow Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein of California, Barbara A. Mikulski of Maryland and Carol Moseley Braun of Illinois in what marked "the first time the five senators have traveled together on behalf of a fellow senator," according an Associated Press report.
Link


Government
Acid flashback: CIA's mind-control experiment reverberates 40 years after hearings
2017-08-31
[Wash Times] Forty years later, the story still seems hard to credit: In the summer of 1977, Capitol Hill was gripped by revelations of the CIA’s top-secret MK-Ultra mind control research program, targeting unsuspecting American citizens, in some cases by luring them to brothels to be fed LSD-laced cocktails.

The blockbuster hearings that summer, chaired by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, and aided by a timely dump of intelligence documents, touched some of the country’s rawest nerves: the assassination of Kennedy’s brothers, the possibility of mind-controlled "Manchurian candidates" and the increasing prominence of LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs across Western culture.

Although the CIA program officially ran from 1953 to 1964, its dark and fertile legacy stretches to today, living on in modern conspiracy theories about U.S. intelligence agencies’ ability and willingness to manipulate society through surveillance, disinformation, celebrity culture and strategic news leaks.

Security advocates argue that domestic intelligence-gathering is vital for the sake of homeland security. Critics counter that revelations that the CIA and the National Security Agency can hack into phones, computers and even televisions connected to the internet show their powers are still too great and threaten essential personal liberties and constitutional protections.

The 1977 MK-Ultra hearings first tilled similar suspicions and were considered a critical pivot in official and popular attitudes toward the nation’s intelligence community. Triggered in part by the shock of the Watergate scandal, they also revealed the U.S. government’s covert assassination programs and surveillance of American citizens brought to light by the Church Committee’s 1975 investigations of the FBI, CIA and NSA.

The August 1977 MK-Ultra hearings specifically explored what seemed like an outlandish idea straight out of science fiction: the possibility of government mind control.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Virgil: The Real Siberian Candidate and the Deep State
2016-12-20
[Breitbart] The American politician, a presidential aspirant, was explicit in his secret-but-audacious message to the Russian leadership in Moscow: Help me win the White House, and then, once I’m in the Oval Office, I will return the favor.
"This is my last election ... After my election I have more flexibility"
The Russians carefully considered the American’s quid pro quo. And if it’s not so clear what Moscow actually did, or didn’t do, in response to the offer, well, what about Russia is clear? As Winston Churchill once said of the whole country, "It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma."

So about the only thing we know for sure is that the American wanted to sell out his county for his own political advantage.

Is Virgil alleging treacherous machinations by Donald Trump, working with Vladimir Putin, to defeat Hillary Clinton?

Nyet! I am simply recalling the well-documented history of the multiple efforts by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) to conspire with Leonid Brezhnev and other leaders of the Soviet Union in the 70s and 80s, as he schemed to win the American presidency.

This disturbing bit of history was first reported in Great Britain in 1992, and has been recalled in the US many times since: notably, by historian Herbert Romerstein in 2003, by historian Paul Kengor in 2007, by writer Kevin Mooney in 2010, by Breitbart’s James Zumwalt on August 12, 2016, and by Mooney again on December 14.

Yet curiously, the Main Stream Media has never been interested in the voluminous Kennedy-Russia story.
Link


Government
McConnell praises Obama, says they are an '€˜odd couple'
2015-05-12
[The Right Scoop] I'm sure McConnell is going to have a great time with Obama at the next White House cocktail party, seeing as how he and Obama are now an 'odd couple':

WASHINGTON TIMES -- "A lot of folks like to joke about the odd couple that was Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch," Mr. McConnell said Sunday at an event at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute in Boston, referring to the late liberal lion and Mr. Hatch, a Republican senator from Utah. "But I think Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama may have them outdone."

"I had to warn reporters not to faint last week before offering the president some praise on trade," Mr. McConnell said, according to USA Today. "I'm even getting handwritten notes from the president these days. He sent one the other day to thank me for supporting the nomination of Loretta Lynch."

Sorry, I gotta go get a barf bag. This bipartisan love affair is making me very nauseous.


Link


Government
Fauxichantis Gives Presidential Podium a Test Run
2015-03-30
[Weekly Standard] Today in Massachusetts, at a ceremony for the the Edward M. Kennedy Institute, Senator Elizabeth Warren borrowed President Obama's lectern for a bit. Behind the lectern, Warren looked almost presidential.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Democrats are now the party of perceived privilege, and GOP is the party of the people
2010-08-01
by JOAN VENNOCHI
... writing in the Bahston Ferfawdsake Globe...
DEMOCRAT John I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry sets sail in a $7 million yacht built in New Zealand. Republican Scott Downtown Scotty Brown hits the campaign trail in a GMC pickup truck with 200,000 miles on it.

From Newport, R.I., -- where Kerry's "Isabel'' was berthed before heading to Nantucket -- to Rhinebeck, N.Y. -- where Chelsea Investment Bankerette Clinton will marry in a mansion modeled after Versailles -- today's Democrats are looking more like Louis XVI than Tip O'Neill.

Kick in the First Family's vacation plans for Martha's Vineyard, and there's a real air of Marie Antoinette & Co. retreating to idyllic gardens, while Fox News whips up revolutionary flames. The ethics charges against Representative Charlie (Yez got nuttin' on me, coppers!) Rangel of New York are added foie gras.

In 2008, Republican John Maverick McCain
... the former foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution...
was the presidential candidate with so many houses, he lost count. Barack B.O. Obama was the guy with only one somewhat luxurious home. Today, President Obama presides over a party of perceived privilege, while Republicans accessorize themselves as the party of the people.

Brown accessorized brilliantly during last January's Senate race in Massachusetts. He's not mega-rich like Kerry, yet comfortable enough, with five properties and a horse his daughter co-owned for a time with a race track owner. But Brown's humble pickup truck and barn jacket remain the enduring symbols of his upstart campaign to win the seat held for decades by the late Teddy The Lion of Chappaquiddick Kennedy.

Kennedy was a rich and powerful Democrat who kept a connection to the people in a way that Brown and millionaire Sarah Mama Grizzly Palin understand.
Palin was a millionaire before she quit as governor of Alaska?
Brown was a millionaire before he was elected to the Senate?
But some Democrats just don't get it, from Governor Deval (Whoa! Nice drapes!) Patrick's fancy drapes and Cadillac to House Speaker Nancy (San Fran Nan) Pelosi's Armani suits and taxpayer-funded military jet.

It isn't about having a lot of money. It's about making people feel you are rubbing your money in their faces, while draining their modest assets for sketchy government programs funded by taxes you don't want to pay.

Republican Mitt Romney is worth more than $200 million, with enough cushion to invest $35 million in his 2008 presidential bid. His real estate holdings include a $12 million mansion in La Jolla, Calif., that was once owned by actor Cliff Robertson, and a lakefront spread in New Hampshire. But for all of Romney's grandiose aspirations and political flip-flops, he is wise enough to avoid grandiose mistakes of excessive, public consumption.

Before his marriage to Teresa Heinz, Kerry was living on his Senate salary and a trust fund worth no more than $100,000. Now he is ranked as the wealthiest member of Congress, with assets of at least $231 million. The Kerry family has five houses, a jet called the "Flying Squirrel'' and a legacy that includes paying to move a fire hydrant from in front of their Beacon Hill home to free up parking space. Now, Kerry's legacy also includes the Newport-berthed yacht and the impression that he was trying to duck Massachusetts taxes.

This might all be empty, frivolous symbolism, except that in politics, perception matters. In this case, the perception fueled by the Kerry yacht fiasco hurts the Democratic agenda.

If the little guy doesn't trust the Democrats, that helps the GOP -- for now.
Ahah. Now we get to the meat of it...
While Republicans drape themselves in middle class values, they are sticking it to the middle class.
... by agitating for tax cuts and competitiveness and individual liberty...
It's all in the effort to deny Obama and the Democrats any positive political message.
Damn them. It's an insidious plot upon the poor Dems. There is no substance. All is perception...
Last week, Senate Republicans rejected a bill to aid small business with expanded loan programs and tax breaks.
That was after the Dems spent all the money that could have covered it...
Before that, Republicans tried to block extension of employment benefits and financial regulatory reforms, which finally passed with minimal help from the GOP.
The "financial regulatory reforms" are so deeply flawed they'll be gnawing the national backside for generations.
These just-say-no tactics can catch up with Republicans -- maybe not in time for midterm elections, but perhaps in time for 2012.
Some of us are hoping they're the opening shots in the new American revolution.
If you watch what Brown does, not what he wears or drives, it's clear that he gets it. He's walking a line that he hopes leads to reelection. It means he can't vote against every Democratic policy aimed at helping ordinary voters. His vote against extending unemployment benefits was risky business for the junior senator from Massachusetts.
He's shown to be a summertime soldier in that new American revolution.
That pickup truck only gets him so far.
Link


Home Front: Politix
From beyond the grave, Ted Kennedy still has his hand in your pocket
2010-07-28
The Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the Senate today unveiled renderings for its approximately $60 million site, which is expected to break ground in Dorchester this fall. The institute will be located next to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum on the University of Massachusetts-Boston campus.
Pic at the link. No, it's not a pyramid...
The two-story, 44,000-square-foot institute was designed by New York-based architect Rafael Violy. “We are extremely excited with the concept that Rafael Vinoly has laid out,” said Peter Meade, institute president and CEO. “Sen. Kennedy envisioned the institute as a living, breathing, constantly evolving bipartisan center that would reflect his passion for education, history and civic engagement.”
Speaking of his passions, will it have a bar?
The institute hopes to raise $125 million to cover the building expenses and start an endowment, Meade said.
And if they can't? I think you know who they'll come looking for...
Federal earmarks worth $38.6 million have already been signed into law for the institute. U.S. Sen. John F. Kerry and U.S. Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Malden) sought an additional $20 million in the next budget.
When it's not ours, money is no object!
Kennedy’s widow, Victoria Reggie Kennedy, told the Herald in May she will reject any additional earmarks beyond the $20 million being sought.
...and not a penny more then 58.6 million! Thanks, Vicky!
Plans for the institute include an exhibit hall, Senate Chamber representation, replica of Kennedy’s office, classrooms, digital library and oral history archives and exhibit hall.
How about a huge aquarium? With a '67 Olds Delmont as a centerpiece?
The digitized archive will eventually cover every action taken by the U.S. Senate, including votes on legislation and resolutions, confirmation nominations and ratifications of treaties.
The archives? Yes, sir. Just look for Senator Byrd's Exalted Cyclops robe and take a right...
Kennedy’s papers will be kept at the JFK Library. However, the institute will maintain digitized copies of those documents.
So why build another Kennedy shrine?
The institute will also house the Edward M. Kennedy Oral History Project, which is billed as the largest ever oral history of an American politician.
"...and when I returned, Mary Jo and the car were gone."
That project, which was done with the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, includes interviews with 200 people and more than 60 hours of taped interviews with Kennedy.
"Senator Dodd continued..."and then we had another bottle and sandwiched the waitress. What a helluva guy Ted was, I tell ya."
The institute is designed to serve middle and high school groups, college students and faculty, new senators, government officials and tourists.
Link


Home Front: Politix
Critics blast Kennedy-branded earmarks
2010-04-20
More than $60.4 million in taxpayer-funded pork projects for Massachusetts in the current federal budget carry the name of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, a Herald review of new data shows.

The 95 earmarks - for a vast array of projects that include subsidies for cranberry and blueberry growers ($160,000), the New England Aquarium ($1.25 million), and millions for fishing and military research - show the clout Kennedy continues to wield on federal spending nearly eight months after his death.

Tarah Donoghue, a spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Republican Party, called the spending details, included in a "pig book" report released last week by Citizens Against Government Waste, examples of "excessive spending" that "drives the rapid growth of our government." She and other critics said the spending is inappropriate at a time when the federal debt has reached unprecedented levels.

The Sunday Herald reported yesterday that taxpayer spending on a shrine being built to Kennedy in Dorchester has ballooned to $38.3 million since Kennedy's Aug. 25 death. The money comes from earmarks slipped into a variety of federal agencies by Sen. John F. Kerry and Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Malden).

The powerful Bay State pols want to boost the total outlay to $68 million before the end of this year.

Some $28.9 million of that would be siphoned from the Defense Department budget alone - money the backers of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate at Columbia Point say is justifiable because the institute will sponsor programs for the children of military veterans.

Critics of government boondoggles criticize the taxpayer expense, noting that the Kennedy family and its friends are wealthy and connected enough to raise what they need privately.

Barbara Anderson, an anti-tax crusader and co-founder of Massachusetts Citizens for Limited Taxation, said "people responsible for building up debt shouldn't be getting memorials."
Link


Home Front: Politix
No special privileges for Kennedys
2010-04-15
It must be nice to be a Kennedy. To paraphrase American Express, privilege has its privileges. According to theBoston Globe, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's family is to be given "a rare opportunity to raise objections" to anything in the late senator's 3,000-page FBI file before it is released to the public. This extraordinary concession is being granted because, "the family of a deceased person may have a privacy interest," according to Dennis Argall, an FBI spokesman. Argall further assures us that the family can't object to removing portions of the document simply because it is "embarrassing." What he doesn't say is this: It will be impossible for the public to know exactly what information was withheld at the family's request and why.

There would be a multitude of possible explanations, however, because the Kennedy family has produced a president, multiple senators, congressmen, and ambassadors during the past five decades. JFK Jr. even founded a magazine that traded in political and celebrity gossip. Privacy seems like a poor excuse for a family that has so consistently sought and cultivated the limelight -- and whose members continue to seek it, as seen by Caroline Kennedy's cartoonish run at a U.S. Senate seat from New York last year.

Any Kennedy hoping to get elected in the future should understand that there is a very fine line between respecting a family's privacy and sparing it further embarrassment, particularly since Ted Kennedy's life left more than a few prominent blots on the family escutcheon. The most prominent were Chappaquiddick, the William Kennedy Smith rape trial, and the scurrilous 1983 entreaty to the Soviets to help undermine President Reagan in exchange for assistance in electing Democrats.

In any case, Kennedy's life, warts and all, is now part of American history and thus deserves to be analyzed as dispassionately as possible, which requires having access to all of the facts, including those that might embarrass the Kennedy clan. It's not for either the Kennedy family or the FBI to decide what details of his public life are inconvenient. The very fact that the Kennedys appear so eager to censor what the public is ultimately able to learn about the family suggests the importance of protecting access to all of the documents in that file for the public today and for historians tomorrow.
Link


Home Front: Politix
How Pelosi Saved Health Care
2010-03-24
Obama wasn't waiting for the polls to close in Massachusetts at 8 that evening. He already knew that his Democratic Party was about to suffer an embarrassing loss. In the bitterest of ironies, the Senate seat held for nearly 47 years by Democrat Edward M. Kennedy, who had been the leading voice in Congress for universal health care, was about to fall into Republican hands.
The wheels were coming off...
Now the president was asking members of his assembled brain trust: What were they going to do?

Mathematically, Scott Brown's impending victory would deny Democrats a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. With only 59 votes loosely under his control, Reid wanted the House to adopt the version of the health-care bill that had barely squeaked through the Senate on Christmas Eve.

No way, said Pelosi. "The Senate bill is a non-starter," she said. "I can't sell that to my members."
Yet, in only 61 days, San Fran Nan did exactly that.
As Pelosi and Reid left the White House that night, the administration was coming to the conclusion that its fatal mistake had been giving up so much control to Congress. Although the strategy was intended to correct the mistakes President Bill Clinton made in 1993 when his wife's task force wrote a health-care bill in secret, the Obama White House belatedly realized that the months of delay, closed-door negotiations and special deals had tarnished the effort and a president who won office by promising to change the way Washington operates.
And he changed it, all right!
And so came the first attempt at a retooled strategy: a commander in chief back in charge. Obama would still need Pelosi and Reid to deliver votes, but this time the White House intended to steer more aggressively.

Obama, who felt particularly stung by critics who said he had broken his pledge to air the health-care debate on television, immediately embraced the summit concept. It would be a chance to reset the effort, display his willingness to accept Republicans' ideas and claim - albeit more for show than substance - that he was crafting a "new" bill that was not sullied by the deals struck in Congress.
And in the end, we got the old bill, as far as I can tell.
The first House tally had been close, with just two votes to spare, and it was headed for defeat until an extraordinary day just before when Pelosi, confronting a major rift over federal funding for abortion, called together the female Democrats in the House and said, "We're standing on the brink of doing something great. I'm not letting anything stand in the way of that."

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) launched into a tirade against David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser and one of Obama's closest confidants. "I have been in a slow burn here, a slow burn!" the lawmaker hollered from the last row of the meeting room. "I'm just livid."

Lacing his commentary with his usual profanity, Franken complained that the health-care campaign had been lackluster and leaderless, particularly in the tentative period since Brown's victory.

"Goddamn it, what's the deal here?" he said, as colleagues, their spouses and aides looked on. "You're talking platitudes, and we have to go home and defend ourselves. We're getting the crap kicked out of us!"
Just wait, Al, just wait.
Kucinich's support was more than just one vote in the "yes" column; it was the start of the momentum the White House had been struggling to create. In short order, the news rolled out in a steady, well-choreographed clip.

Obama, meanwhile, doused a brush fire with organized labor over changes to a new excise tax that unions did not like. In a chance encounter in an aide's office that was actually well planned out, Obama pulled AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka into the Oval Office. "We're at the one-yard line. We've just got to get the ball in the end zone," the president said, imploring Trumka to hold his complaints for another day. "Rich, you've got to stay with me."

At 4 p.m., Altmire released his statement and at 7:30 Obama called once more. "I want to give you something to think about before the vote," the president said gently into the phone. "Picture yourself on Monday morning. You wake up and look at the paper. It's the greatest thing Congress has done in 50 years. And you were on the wrong team."

Protesters on the Capitol lawn. Rumors of enticements - a Cabinet post, water access in California, money for NASA. More phone calls, more news conferences, frayed nerves, exhaustion. At the Capitol, Pelosi was once again dealing with the specter of abortion funding, shuttling from office to office as she locked down the final votes.
So they won. But nothing about the promised Executive Order that would convert Stupak. Did I dream that?
Link


Home Front: Politix
Delahunt to spend more time with family
2010-03-05
While the getting's good. These guy's skying out must be seeing November in their nightmares...
WASHINGTON — Representative William Delahunt will not seek re-election to Congress, the seven-term Democrat will announce tomorrow, ending a nearly 40-year career in elected office and giving Republicans hope of capturing the seat, which stretches from Cape Cod to the South Shore.

"It's got nothing to do with politics," the Quincy Democrat said today. "Life is about change. I think it's healthy. It's time."
Past time ...
The 68-year-old lawmaker said he has been considering leaving the House for several years, but was talked out of it two years ago by the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who convinced his friend he should stay and help President Obama with his first-term agenda.

"He said, 'Come on — this is a new time. It's a new era. We [will] have a new president. We're all needed," Delahunt recalled Kennedy telling him. Once Kennedy died last year, Delahunt said he grappled with whether to stay and work on the issues Kennedy held dear.

"Clearly, since his death, there's something missing. There's a void. With the void, you feel the need to be here because there's much to do," Delahunt said wistfully in an exclusive interview.

But the congressman said he concluded that after nearly four decades in public service, the grueling House schedule was taking its toll on his personal life.

"I've got a granddaughter," the divorced father of two said. "Given the pace down here, I don't want to miss out on her childhood, her first year."

The congressman has faced recent questions about the handling of the 1986 Amy Bishop shooting case, which occurred when he was Norfolk County district attorney. Delahunt has said consistently that his office was not told that Bishop fled with a loaded weapon after killing her brother in what police then called an accident. But the case has absolutely nothing to do with his decision to retire, Delahunt said.

Voters in Delahunt's 10th District gave Republican Scott Brown his best margins in the state in the special Jan. 19 election to fill Kennedy's seat. But Delahunt said the wave of anti-incumbent anger also did not affect his decision.

Delahunt's retirement is the 17th among House Democrats, and the third among lawmakers with close ties to Kennedy. Senator Christopher Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and a close Kennedy friend, announced his retirement in January; Rhode Island Representative Patrick Kennedy, the late senator's son, followed suit last month.

The lawmaker established himself in Washington as a leading appeaser voice in his party on Latin American and Caribbean issues, traveling many times to Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela, where Delahunt negotiated with president Hugo Chavez to provide discounted oil from Venezuela, the fourth largest supplier of foreign oil to the United States.
Yeah, Suntan Billy liked heading south. And if he had to kiss some commie ass to get a free "fact finding" trip down in, like, February, it was a small price to pay. I'm sure Hugo and El Jefe will always be glad to see him. They might even put him on the payroll to be their mouthpiece in DC.
He also hosted a "Grupo de Boston" weekend in the Cape with Venezuelan government and opposition leaders, hoping to get the feuding sides together by having them spend time together in a neutral place.
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More