-Land of the Free |
Commanding officer of nuclear-powered US Navy aircraft carrier relieved of duty after crash with merchant ship |
2025-02-21 |
[NY Post] The hammer falls The commanding officer of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that slammed into a ship near Egypt last week was yanked from the position "due to a loss of confidence in his ability," the Navy said Thursday. Capt. Dave Snowden was "relieved" of his job at the helm of the USS Harry S. Truman and temporarily reassigned following the wild crash in the Mediterranean Sea on Feb. 12, according to the military branch. "The U.S. Navy holds commanding officers to the highest standard and takes action to hold them accountable when those standards are not met," the Navy said in a statement. Snowden was replaced by Capt. Christopher Hill, and temporarily assigned to Naval Air Forces Atlantic. No injuries were reported during the crash, which unfolded near Port Said at 11:46 p.m. Related: USS Harry S. Truman 02/20/2025 Puntland Forces Capture ISIS Members Involved in Extortion and Bombings USS Harry S. Truman 02/19/2025 Aircraft Carrier USS Harry S. Truman In Greece For Repairs Following Collision USS Harry S. Truman 02/16/2025 Mohammed al-Houthi warns for unprecedented Yemeni military response to US plans for Gaza displacement |
Link |
Europe |
After defeats in Ukraine and Africa, the European Union is trying to win back in Serbia |
2023-12-07 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Bogdan Kish [REGNUM] Early parliamentary elections will take place in Serbia on December 17. The position of the current government is strong, but the pro-Western opposition, not without outside help, intends to seriously compete for the majority in parliament and turn Belgrade towards the West. Due to its political position of neutrality and geographical location, Serbia is forced to constantly balance between the United States and the EU on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other. Therefore, elections here have always attracted increased attention from both the West and the East. However, this year the early parliamentary elections are attracting increased interest, primarily in Brussels. Against the background of the failed Ukrainian “counter-offensive”, the reduction of financial and military-technical assistance to Kyiv, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the economic crisis, the European Union is extremely interested in “stability” in the Balkans. By which is meant complete subordination to Brussels. Serbia has recently been a bone in the throat for the EU and the US, as it does not recognize Kosovo even under pressure and does not impose anti-Russian sanctions. Considering that both the United States and the EU are facing elections in 2024, the West is trying to close the “Serbian issue” as soon as possible. For the Western average, the presidential elections in the States and the elections to the European Parliament are more important than affairs “on the periphery of Europe,” so European and American politicians are trying to earn at least some political points by “settling” the situation in Serbia. They understand the complexity of the situation in Belgrade and are doing everything possible to prevent a united pro-Western coalition from coming to power. BETS ON VICTORY Predicting election results under such foreign political pressure and with a large number of domestic political problems is a thankless task. That is why, in general, it was not “independent,” pro-government or near-state structures that took up the task of compiling forecasts and figures, but bookmakers. In Serbia, this is more than just entertainment and a profitable business, it is a kind of state within a state. Therefore, in general, there is practically no doubt in their assessment of the approximate prospects of political forces. According to a joint analysis of the portal 192.rs and the bookmaker MeridianBet, the current government, represented by the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), has the greatest chances of winning and forming a majority in parliament. The SNA, led by Defense Minister Milos Vucevic , is projected to win approximately 42.5% of the vote. Next comes the pro-Western coalition “Serbia against violence” (SPN), led by Miroslav Aleksic - 21.3%. Third place goes to the coalition led by the Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) of Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic - 10.2%. The supposedly pro-Russian coalition, consisting of the Dveri and Zavetnica parties ( Boško Obradović and Milica Đurđević ), will receive approximately 6.2% of the vote. They are followed by the NADA coalition with Milos Jovanovic - 5.4%. Vuk Jeremic's People's Party and the coalition led by ex-President Boris Tadic will each gain less than 3%. At the same time, the population is not very interested in the current elections. Bookmakers for the parliamentary elections are predicting turnout at 53.5%, a drop from the 2022 election, when it was 58.6%. As practice shows, over the past 10 years, not a single party has been able to compete with the coalition of the SNS and the Union of Right Forces. Judging by the first forecasts, we should not expect any big changes and the power in Serbia will not change. Yes, the position of the Serbian Progressive Party has deteriorated greatly in recent years, but it still remains the most popular in the country. Moreover, the SNS, as has happened more than once, will be able to agree with the Socialist Party of Serbia on the formation of a majority, especially against the backdrop of the strengthening position of the pro-Western opposition “Serbia against violence.” At the same time, the SPN will obviously have problems forming a coalition after the elections. The pro-Russian opposition, represented by the Dveri and Zavetnitsa parties, is not ready to move towards rapprochement with pro-Western forces because of their position on Kosovo and Metohija, Russia and NATO. However, these forces have neither the unity, nor the influence, nor the great trust of citizens to claim a serious result. Therefore, for them, third or fourth place in the elections and getting into parliament will be considered a success. For Serbia Against Violence, the Serbs from Republika Srpska, located in Bosnia, are a big problem. Their leader Milorad Dodik openly called for voting against the pro-Western coalition, since it would first recognize the “genocide” in Srebrenica and turn away from Banja Luka to please the West. “The most important thing for Republika Srpska is that Serbia remains strong, and in order to remain strong, it must not fall into the hands of auto chauvinists ,” he said. According to Dodik, there are many people on the list of this coalition who believe that the Republika Srpska should not exist, therefore they are not political opponents, but enemies. Considering that many residents of Republika Srpska, including the top leadership of the entity, have Serbian passports, they will provide a large number of votes to other parties. The situation is similar with the Serbs in Montenegro. They oppose the SPN because this coalition will forget about the Serbian diaspora, which has been struggling for existence for 30 years against the backdrop of ever-increasing Serbophobia. GROSCHEL COMMISSION The greatest interest in the elections in Serbia is shown by Western embassies and directly by the United States and Germany. The duty speaker on the topic of elections is US Ambassador to Serbia Christopher Hill , who since the 90s of the last century has been seen in ties with Albanian militants from the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army. Hill said being ambassador to Serbia during an election campaign is a special challenge, but he is not interested in interfering in the election process. At the same time, the American ambassador regularly makes anti-Russian statements and calls on Serbia to focus on cooperation with the West: “It is completely unrealistic to maintain good relations with Moscow, which has created huge problems and thereby made it clear to everyone what should be done . ” The EU also decided that it was impossible to remain on the sidelines. Therefore, Brussels decided to send a commission to Serbia to monitor the elections. An eight-member European Parliament delegation, led by Slovenian Klemen Grošelj , will ensure a “celebration of democracy.” At the same time, Groschel is an extremely interesting character. The Slovenian had previously strongly opposed early parliamentary elections and stated that they would be rigged in favor of the current government. According to him, the mission in Serbia will be “listening, observing, holding many meetings with all stakeholders and civil society.” True, the head of the European delegation, even before his election to this position, “listened and observed” and even met with representatives of the Serbian opposition. He also has his own favorites on the Serbian political landscape. Groshel recently visited Belgrade, met with the Free Citizens Movement and openly supported this party. “DSG is a political force that stands for a modern and democratic Serbia, which should become a full member of the European Union. They have my full support,” Groschel noted in September. A politician from Slovenia previously stated that the American and European policy of “appeasing Vucic” is to blame for the situation in Serbia. The US and EU allegedly turned a blind eye to his “undemocratic domestic political steps” in exchange for resolving the issue of relations with Kosovo. He called Serbia “ a country completely captured by the ruling regime, in which there are not the slightest conditions for any criticism of the government either from the opposition or from the media.” Obviously, it would be a stretch to call Groschel objective. Moreover, in addition to the Slovenian, the delegation will include the European Parliament rapporteur on Serbia, Vladimir Bilchik, as well as Andreas Schieder , who said before the elections in Montenegro that “our friend Milo Djukanovic is the best presidential candidate.” The West gave the Albanians carte blanche to terrorize the Kosovo Serbs It is especially interesting that the German Viola von Cramon , one of the main critics of Serbia and a member of the German parliament from the Greens, is mentioned as one of the members of the commission . This party, in the midst of the election campaign, hosted representatives of the “Serbia against violence” list in the Bundestag at a rally entitled “Serbia before the elections - between autocracy and democratic awakening.” Thus, “Serbia against violence” will have the strongest support not only from Western countries, but also from a number of Western and pro-Western media in Serbia and the region. Regardless of the outcome of the elections, enormous pressure will be exerted on the current government, and any pro-Serbian (pro-Russian) opposition will be marginalized by the “free” media to please Brussels and Washington. The SNA in a coalition with the SPS will still be able to form a majority, but in this case the pressure on Belgrade will increase exponentially, which will complicate Belgrade’s already fragile neutrality and defending its position on Kosovo and Metohija. Europe, against the backdrop of a series of defeats in Ukraine, the Transcaucasus and Africa, will put pressure on Serbia for political points before the upcoming elections, in order to somehow justify itself to its voters and prove that the EU still has authority. |
Link |
Home Front: WoT |
A former top adviser destroyed Obama's Iraq policy in one sentence |
2015-04-16 |
![]() And her new book, "The Unraveling: High Hopes and Missed Opportunities in Iraq," is not kind to the Obama administration's handling of Iraq. From 2007 to 2010, Sky was the political adviser to US Gen. Ray Odierno when he served as deputy American commander in Iraq and then the US-led mission's top commander. During Sky's time with Odierno, violence in the country plummeted after a US troop surge and crucial Sunni tribal cooperation stabilized the country. Odierno "wanted US engagement with Iraq to continue for years to come, but led by US civilians, not the military," Sky wrote, according to a book excerpt published in Politico. "He believed that, in order to train Iraqi security forces and provide the psychological support needed to maintain a level of stability, 20,000 or so US troops needed to stay in Iraq beyond 2011." The Obama administration, however, eventually went along with the plan backed by Qassem Suleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's Quds Force. That plan called for no US troops beyond 2011 and relied on the continued support of the authoritarian Iran-backed regime of Nouri al-Maliki, then Iraq's prime minister. "Iran's goal was to ensure that Iraq was not integrated into the Arab world, instead becoming a close ally of Iran," Sky wrote. "Maliki would be able to achieve this because all the neighboring Sunni countries hated him." Obama called the removal of the last US troops from Iraq in December 2011 a "historic" moment, adding that the country they were leaving behind was "an extraordinary achievement." Given the state of war-torn Iraq today, history has been unkind to that assessment. Ali Khedery, the longest continuously serving US official during the Iraq war (2003 to 2009), has said America's continued support of Maliki in December 2010 made it so that "Iraq's path toward civil war was really inevitable." That's because Maliki's new lease on life led him to steer Baghdad "toward a very pro-Iranian and sectarian agenda, which inevitably disillusioned and disenfranchised Sunni Arabs for a second time." The rise and resilience of the Islamic State, also called ISIS or ISIL, which rampaged across northern Iraq from neighboring Syria last summer, is partly a manifestation of this Sunni discontent. At this point, the militant group is "fundamentally a form of Sunni-power political projection," as explained by Michael Weiss, coauthor of "ISIS: Inside the Terror Army." In 2010, however, those in charge of the administration's policy -- namely, ambassador Christopher Hill and Vice President Joe Biden -- saw the trajectory of US policy differently. Sky described a visit to Iraq from Biden at the end of August 2010: "Biden had been persuaded by the arguments that there was no one but Maliki who could be prime minister and that he would sign a new security agreement with the United States," Sky wrote in the Politico excerpt, noting later that the security agreement was never signed. "The Obama administration wanted to see an Iraqi government in place before the US midterm elections in November," Sky said. "Biden believed the quickest way to form a government was to keep Maliki as prime minister and to cajole other Iraqis into accepting this." Despite the best efforts of Sky and her colleagues, she could not convince the administration otherwise. "Biden was a nice man, but he simply had the wrong instincts on Iraq," Sky writes, according to a snippet published in The Wall Street Journal. "If only Obama had paid attention to Iraq ... But his only interest in Iraq was in ending the war." Tim Arango, the Baghdad bureau chief for The New York Times, told Reddit in September that "after 2011 the administration basically ignored the country. And when officials spoke about what was happening there they were often ignorant of the reality." For the region, the administration's choices seem to signal an accusation that would become part of Obama's foreign-policy legacy. "In the Arabic media, there was confusion as to why the United States and Iran should both choose Maliki as prime minister, and this fueled conspiracy theories about a secret deal between those two countries," Sky noted. |
Link |
Iraq |
Iraqi PM accused Iran, Syria of arming fighters |
2011-02-04 |
[Asharq al-Aswat] Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki told US diplomats in 2009 that neighbouring Iran and Syria were providing weapons to cut-thoat groups within Iraq, a leaked document showed on Thursday. Maliki's comments to then-US ambassador to Storied Baghdad Christopher Hill came in the midst of a year-long diplomatic row with Damascus that prompted both Iraq and Syria to withdraw their respective ambassadors, while US officials have long alleged that Iran backs militia groups operating inside Iraq. "Iran and Syria have both been providing weapons -- including "Strela" (SA-7B) shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles -- to cut-thoat groups within Iraq," Maliki told Hill in a September 22, 2009 meeting, read the cable published on Wednesday by whistleblower website WikiLeaks. "Five members of the Sadrist-affiliated Promise Day Brigade (also linked to the Iranian al-Quds force) were captured recently attempting to smuggle such missiles in the false floor of a Toyota Land Cruiser, Maliki alleged." The Sadrist movement is the political grouping loyal to radical Shiite holy man ![]() Tateral-Sadr ... the Iranian catspaw holy man who was 22 years old in 2003 and was nearing 40 in 2010... , whose former militia arm, the Mahdi Army, held violent festivities with US forces in the aftermath of the US-led invasion to oust Saddam Hussein in 2003. They were eventually routed by US and Iraqi forces in 2008. The document, classified by then acting embassy deputy chief of mission Gary Grappo, said Maliki "hoped each would receive a death sentence." US military officials have persistently alleged that Iran funds, trains and backs Shiite Mohammedan militia groups in Iraq, charges Tehran denies. Maliki's remarks, meanwhile, came in the midst of a major diplomatic row with Syria which only ended in September 2010 when the two countries agreed to restore their respective envoys. The neighbours' tit-for-tat recall of envoys on August 25, 2009 came six days after massive truck bombings against the ministries of finance and foreign affairs in Storied Baghdad left 95 dead and around 600 maimed, the worst day of violence in Iraq in 18 months. Iraq accused Syria of sheltering two cut-thoats, Mohammed Yunis al-Ahmed and Sattam Farhan, who orchestrated the attacks, charges Damascus denied. |
Link |
China-Japan-Koreas | ||||
Activity at Nork Nuclear Sites | ||||
2010-12-15 | ||||
![]()
"If progress goes on at the current pace, the North will have dug a cave 1 km deep, the depth where it is possible to conduct a nuclear test, between March and May next year," the officer said. Voice of America, quoting a U.S. Congressional Research Service report, reported on Dec. 7 that the North could conduct a nuclear test as a proxy for nuclear weapons developing nations such as Iran. The North is also carrying out massive construction in Yongbyon. Experts including Siegfried Hecker, a U.S. nuclear scientist who visited Yongbyon last month, believe that the North is building a 25-30 MW reactor. But a South Korean security official said, "The North has never admitted what it is building. We're just speculating that it's building a nuclear facility whose purpose is unclear."
South Korea and the U.S. are worried that the North could heighten tensions on the peninsula by using a nuclear threat after the artillery attack on Yeonpyeong Island. It apparently aims to sway public opinion in the international community and South Korea in favor of early talks with the North by either conducting a third nuclear test or boosting its uranium-based nuclear capability. Former chief U.S. nuclear negotiator Christopher Hill was quoted by VOA as saying that the North's disclosure of the uranium enrichment plant proves that the regime lied in the six-party talks.
| ||||
Link |
Iraq |
Sadr Group support former Prime Minister Allawi for new PM's post: |
2010-08-24 |
![]() "The Sadr Movement has expressed their approval to nominate Dr. Iyad Allawi for the new prime minister's post and the formation of the future government, whilst our negotiations with the Movement have reached advanced phases and their resultss have been positive and fruitful," MP Ziyad Al-Darb told Aswat Al-Iraq News Agency. Al-Darb said that Al-Iraqiya List's contacts with Al-Fadeela Party, led by its Secretary General Hashim Al-Hashimi and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (SIIC), led by Ammar Al-Hakim, "are expected to be settled within one week from now." The Iraqi political arena is witnessing continuous differences in viewpoints among the main lists that won the nationwide elections that took place in Iraq in March, 2009, particularly regarding their competition to win the new prime minister's post and the formation of the forthcoming government, mainly between the largest two winners in the elections, Al-Iraqiya Bloc and the State of Law Bloc, despite fact that none of the two blocs have achieved the parliamentary majority that assign it to form the new government alone. The new parliament's sessions have been postponed several times, an event that was considered as "violation of the constitutional period allowed in this respect to elect a new parliament speaker, his two deputies and a new President." With regards to the nomination of outgoing Prime Minister, Nouri Al-Maliki, for a second prime minister's term, MP Al-Darb said, "The new U.S. Ambassador, Jeffrey, has a new vision that differs from his predecessor, Christopher Hill, towards the political process in Iraq..He wishes to see the unification of Al-Iraqiya bloc with the State of Law bloc in one united coalition to form the new government, whoever the prime minister might be; and he does not oppose the formation of the next government by Al-Iraqiya bloc." Speaking about the intention of the assignment of the new prime minister's post for the Shiite sect and no other sect, Al-Darb said, "The Constitution had not included a condition that the prime minister's post be assigned for a certain sect..It has reiterated that the winning list of the largest number of votes, in this case being Al-Iraqiya, is to form the new government." Regarding the situation of the National Alliance between the State of Law and the Iraqi National Alliance, Al-Darb said, "The Alliance had been fragile and it had failed to present a certain candidate for the new prime minister's post." A source, representing the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council had told Aswat Al-Iraq last Friday that the Sadr Trend had been exerting efforts to convince the nomination of the leader in Al-Iraqiya Alliance, Mohammed Allawi, to hold the new prime minister's post, if both alliances would agree on his nomination. |
Link |
Iraq |
New US ambassador to Iraq arrives in Baghdad |
2010-08-19 |
[Al Arabiya Latest] James Jeffrey, the new U.S. ambassador to Iraq, arrived in Baghdad on Wednesday and presented his diplomatic credentials to the conflict-torn nation's head of state, the US embassy said in a statement. Jeffrey, a veteran diplomat with extensive experience of the Middle East, met President Jalal Talabani and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari at ceremonies in Baghdad, it said. "It is a great honor for me to return to Iraq," Jeffrey was quoted as saying. "I look forward to renewing old friendships, strengthening our ties with Iraqi leaders and deepening our civilian engagement for the long term throughout this historic land." On August 5, the U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed Jeffrey's appointment to replace Christopher Hill, in a diplomatic move that coincides with President Barack Obama's pledge to end combat operations in Iraq by the end of the month. Jeffrey's career includes a previous stint in Baghdad, unlike Hill, who was best known for his Jeffrey had most recently served as ambassador to Turkey, a NATO ally that has seen its usually warm ties with Washington frayed over Ankara's tensions with Israel and opposition to US-backed sanctions on Iran. |
Link |
Iraq | |
Hill: We wont leave any unfinished tasks prior to pullout | |
2010-07-12 | |
BAGHDAD / Aswat al-Iraq: U.S. ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill urged on Saturday all Iraqi political parties to speed up forming a government, stressing that his government does not back a certain figure in Iraq. The United States are arranging things in the disputed areas prior to the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq and will not leave any unfinished tasks, Hill said during a press conference he held at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad. Asked by Aswat al-Iraq news agency about a solution to end the government forming crisis, Hill replied that the Iraqi government must be formed from all groups. There are three sovereign posts that must be distributed in accordance with proportion. He noted that the United States wants a long-term relationship with Iraq no matter the figure who would form a government is. Our signing of a framework agreement with Iraq goes beyond the pullout of combat troops from the country, he said. By the time the last U.S. soldier would get out of Iraq, the Iraqi army would be one of the best in the region."
| |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | ||
Chris Hill to Retire from Diplomatic Life | ||
2010-07-06 | ||
After serving as the U.S. ambassador to Poland and South Korea, Hill was promoted to the post of Assistant Secretary of State in 2005. As the head of the U.S. delegation to six-party talks with North Korea, he was key player behind the Sept. 19, 2005 statement of principles whereby North Korea agreed to "complete and verifiable" denuclearization and other agreements which at the time looked like breakthroughs.
| ||
Link |
Iraq |
Iraq rivals meet to bring premiership row to head |
2010-06-30 |
BAGHDAD - Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and his arch rival for the premiership Iyad Allawi met on Wednesday, aides said, in a bid to resolve a row that has stalled coalition talks for months. The meeting was only their second head-to-head since an inconclusive March 7 general election that has created a prolonged power vacuum and fears insurgents intent on derailing constitutional politics might exploit the uncertainty. It was an exchange of points of view and important issues such as the formation of a national unity government,' said Hassan Sneid, a member of parliament from Maliki's State of Law alliance, who was present at the meeting. Sneid said there was no political deal' behind the meeting and its importance had been exaggerated. But he added both Maliki and Allawi expressed their wish to speed up the formation of a government before July 14,' the deadline for parliament to hold its first session since MPs were sworn in earlier this month. Obviously there is going to be a lot of bargaining and discussion about ministries,' Hill told reporters. They are going to look at leadership positions prime minister, president and speaker,' he said. There are questions whether we have a presidency position which is changed,' he added, referring to suggestions that the deadlock over the premiership be resolved by giving more power to the presidency to create checks and balances between the two positions. The important thing from our point of view is that discussions are still ongoing,' the US ambassador added. |
Link |
Iraq | ||
Obama taps James Jeffrey for Iraq ambassador | ||
2010-06-27 | ||
WASHINGTON - US President Barack Obama nominated career diplomat James Jeffrey on Friday to replace Christopher Hill as his ambassador to Iraq at a critical juncture in the seven-year war, the White House said.
I am grateful that these experienced men and women have agreed to serve in my administration as we work to meet our nation's most pressing challenges,' Obama said in a statement announcing several nominations. I look forward to working with them in the coming months and years.' Before being appointed to his post in Ankara, Jeffrey served as deputy national security advisor and assistant to the president at the White House under George W. Bush's administration, according to his official bio. His resume also includes several previous stints in Baghdad and across the Middle East, unlike Hill, best known for his high-profile post as the Bush administration's point man on North Korea's nuclear program. Jeffrey was Bush's principal deputy assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs and special advisor to the secretary of state for Iraq. From 2004 to 2005, he served as deputy chief of mission and later charge d'affaires in Baghdad. Jeffrey held a number of different posts in Washington, Europe and the Middle East, including as deputy chief of mission in both Kuwait and Turkey. He was posted to Munich, Sofia, Tunis and Adana, Turkey. He was previously dispatched to the Balkans, where he served as US ambassador to Albania. Jeffrey was also a US Army infantry branch officer from 1969 to 1976, and served in Germany and Vietnam.
| ||
Link |
Iraq |
US diplomat Christopher Hill to retire |
2010-05-15 |
US diplomat Christopher Hill, who previously served as the Hill is now the US Ambassador to Iraq. The official says the ambassador will resign after witnessing the establishment of a new government in Iraq. Hill was appointed as Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs under the Bush administration in 2005. He worked as the head of the US delegation to the six-party talks at the same time. During this period, Hill advanced direct dialogue with North Korea and succeeded in reaching an agreement on the disabling of the North's nuclear facilities at one stage. But some criticized Hill for making excessive concessions to the North. Include Rantburg as among the critics ... Hill is said to be planning to work at a foreign policy research institute. |
Link |