Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russian air strikes in Syria 'good thing': Carla Del Ponte
2016-02-09
Former war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, who is currently probing rights abuses in Syria, on Monday backed Russia's air strikes on "terrorist groups" in the war-torn country.
This is not a surprise: now if she were asked about U.S. bombing of the same bad guys, her answer would be different. Of course it would.
"Overall, I think the Russian intervention is a good thing, because finally someone is attacking these terrorist groups," Del Ponte told Swiss public broadcaster RTS, listing the Islamic State group and Al-Nusra among the groups targeted.

But Del Ponte, a member of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Syria, quickly added that the Russians apparently "are not distinguishing enough between the terrorists and others, and that is not as good."
Our guys work much harder to do that. Notice she didn't give us any credit...
Her comments came amid international bickering over the Russian air strikes and what role they played in undermining last week's peace talks to end the country's five-year war.

Moscow launched a bombing campaign in Syria last year at the request of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, saying it was targeting the Islamic State group and other Islamist militant organizations. The West has accused Russia of targeting more moderate factions that oppose Assad's regime, and Syrian activists say the strikes have killed civilians, allegations Moscow dismisses as "absurd".
The Rooshun spokes-thug is just being a Rooshun...
UN envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura last week suspended attempts to begin a dialogue between al-Assad's regime and the opposition, as Russia pressed on with its bombing campaign on the ground.

One day after the talks broke down, Russia's defence ministry said that air strikes had hit 875 "terrorist targets" in Syria since the start of the month.

Del Ponte, a 68-year-old Swiss national who came to prominence investigating war crimes in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, also touched on another sensitive subject Monday, saying she thought Assad should be included in peace negotiations.

"If you want a ceasefire, if you want peace, you first have to negotiate with the government," she said, pointing out that the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic was already under investigation when the US negotiated the 1995 Dayton accord with him that ended Yugoslavia's bloody war.
Look what happened to him, too: died of old age in a hotel prison in the Netherlands while awaiting trial. Pencil-neck watched and learned...
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Let's Join One Another to Crush the Unholy, Unruly, Jihadi Muslims
2013-09-04
Yes, its very Onion-ish, and satirical, but under the humourous surface is something to be considered.
By "VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN"

[Breitbart] You Americans want to remove my ally, the Syrian leader Bashar Al-Assad. To borrow a phrase from your John F. Kennedy, Assad may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he's my son-of-a-bitch.

So if you want to destroy him, what are you going to give me in return? If your answer is, "We will give you nothing," well, why would I ever agree to that? That's not negotiation, that's dictation; it's a return to the bad Yeltsin days, when Holy Mother Russia was pushed into the mud like a used whore.

Look, I'll be the first to say that Obama's "red line" comment was dumb. It's obvious he hadn't thought it through; one can see it in the words he used to express his policy. He said that the "red line" would be crossed if "a whole bunch" of chemical weapons were used. What kind of language is that? How does one quantify a "whole bunch"? This is the President of the High-and-Mighty United States, and he's talking like a schoolboy?

The Romans, who knew something about both imperialism and trickery, always asked, cui bono--who benefits? Well, the beneficiaries in this episode are the rebels--also known as Al Qaeda. Way to go, Americans!

So let's check some other news items: Here's a June 6 item from a Turkish newspaper reporting on "the case of Syrian rebels who were seized on the Turkish-Syrian border with two kilograms of sarin." And it's not just the Turks: Carla Del Ponte, the Swiss-born former UN Prosecutor for War Crime Tribunals, has echoed those same charges against the rebels. They're the bad guys!

Yet could this evidence against the rebels all be Russian disinformation? Hey, we're good, but not that good.

Meanwhile, go ahead: Look for this information in your mainstream American media--your so-called "free press." You can barely find it. Yankee lapdog reporters will cover everything that Obama says, and everything that John McCain says, but they won't send reporters to warzones to go and actually figure out what happened.

Yes, American reporters are sheep. They try to figure out what Obama wants them to write, and then they write it. Or if Obama doesn't have a clear line on some topic--which is often--they look over the shoulder of the reporter next to them and copy that. Like I said, sheep.

The result is a herd mentality, showing no understanding of what true necessity truly looks like.

Pakistan is the real problem--they make Afghanistan possible. So those are the real evil empires: Iran and Pakistan. Bringing them to heel won't be easy, of course, but we Russians have never shied away from strong measures. The Americans could learn a lot from us.

So that's my vision. Let's stop worrying about silly little niceties about the right and the wrong way to fight a war. Let's stop trying to bring democracy to barbarians. Instead, let's bring them the only thing they understand--force.

Let's join one another to crush the unholy, unruly, jihadi Muslims. The good Muslims will thank us for it. And if they don't--too bad.
Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Putin for US president - more than ever
2008-08-12
By Spengler

If Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin were president of the United States, would Iran try to build a nuclear bomb? Would Pakistan provide covert aid to al-Qaeda? Would Hugo Chavez train terrorists in Venezuela? Would leftover nationalities with delusions of grandeur provoke the great powers? Just ask Georgia's President Mikheil Saakashvili, who now wishes he never tried to put his 4 million countrymen into strategic play.

In January I urged Americans to draft the Russian leader to succeed George W Bush (Putin for president of the United States, January 8, 2008). Putin's swift and decisive action in Georgia reflects precisely the sort of decisiveness that America requires.

Thanks to Putin, the world has become a much safer place. By intervening in Georgia, Russia has demonstrated that the great powers of the world have nothing to fight about. Russia has wiped the floor with a putative US ally, and apart from a bad case of cream pie on the face, America has lost nothing. The United States and the European community will do nothing to help Georgia, and nothing of substance to penalize the Russian Federation.

Contrary to the hyperventilation of policy analysts on American news shows, the West has no vital interests in Georgia. It would be convenient from Washington's vantage point for oil to flow from the Caspian Sea via Georgia to the Black Sea, to be sure, but nothing that occurs in Georgia will have a measurable impact on American energy security. It is humiliating for the US to watch the Russians thrash a prospective ally, but not harmful, for Georgia never should have been an ally in the first place.

The lack of consequences of Russia's incursion is a noteworthy fact, for never before in the history of the world has the world's economic and military power resided in countries whose fundamental interests do not conflict in any important way. The US enthused over Georgia's ambitions to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and encouraged Saakashvili to overplay his hand. Once it became clear that Russia would not tolerate a NATO member on its southern border, however, Washington had nothing to say about the matter, because no fundamental American interests were at stake.

Washington looks all the sillier for its failure to anticipate a Russian action that Moscow signaled months in advance. After the US and its main European allies recognized the independence of Kosovo from Serbia in February 2008, Russia warned that this action set a precedent for other prospective secessions, notably South Ossetia.

There is no longer any reason to put up with the tantrums of long-redundant tribes. If 3.7 million ethnic Georgians have the right to break away from the 142 million population of the Russian Federation, why shouldn't the 100,000 Ossetians living in Georgia break away and form their own state as well? Most of them have acquired Russian passports and want nothing to do with the Georgians. The Ossetians have spoken their variant of Persian for more than a millennium and had their own kingdom during the Middle Ages.

If the West is going to put itself at risk for 3.8 million ethnic Georgians, roughly the population of Los Angeles, or 5.4 million Tibetans, or 2 million Albanian Muslims in Kosovo, why shouldn't Russia take risks for the South Ossetians, not to mention the 100,000 Abkhaz speakers in Georgia's secessionist Black Sea province? Once the infinite regress of ethnic logic gets into motion, there is no good reason not to pull the world apart like taffy.

Forget the Kosovo Albanians, the South Ossetians, the Abkhazians, Saakashvili and the Dalai Lama. These are relics of an older world that might deserve their own theme park, but not their own state. Precisely what are 3.8 million freedom-loving Georgians supposed to contribute to American strategic interests with its US$2 billion a year of exports consisting (according to the Central Intelligence Agency World Factbook) of "scrap metal, wine, mineral water, ores, vehicles, fruits and nuts"? Georgia's hope was to lever its geographical position on the Russia border by making itself useful to the American military.

If it had not been for America's insistence on installing a gang of trigger-happy pimps and drug-pushers in Kosovo, Russia might have responded less ferociously to the flea bites on its southern border. Make no mistake: the American-sponsored Kosovo regime is the dirtiest anywhere in postwar history. Writing in the Spiegel magazine website last April 24 , Walter Mayr described Kosovo as "a country ruled by corruption and organized crime". For example, Mayr reports,

Ramush Haradinaj is a former KLA commander who later became prime minister of UN-administered Kosovo. His indictment in The Hague consisted of 37 charges, including murder, torture, rape and the expulsion of Serbs, Albanians and gypsies in the weeks following the end of the war in 1999. Carla Del Ponte, former chief prosecutor of the UN War Crimes Tribunal, called him a "gangster in uniform". He returned to Kosovo this spring, after his acquittal on April 3. [1]

America's wag-the-dog war against Serbia in 1999 over alleged ethnic cleansing of Muslim Albanians in Kosovo won the undeserved support of Republicans as well as Democrats, to the extent that too many people on all sides of Washington politics risked their reputation to admit that the whole business was a stupid mistake. Washington has simply dug itself in deeper, joined at the hip to a government less savory than any banana republic dictatorship that enjoyed American favor at the depths of the Cold War (See The inconvenient Serbs, Asia Times Online, April 17, 2007.)

America remains so committed to the myth of moderate Islam that it is prepared to invent it. Kosovo, like the Turkey of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, supposedly embodies a moderate, Sufi-derived brand of Islam that will foster an American partnership with the Muslim world. The US intelligence community knows perfectly well that the networks that traffic prostitutes through Albania into Italy and the rest of Europe also move narcotics, weapons and terrorists from Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to Grozny in Chechnya to Tirana in Albania and Pristina in Kosovo.

The Russians know better. As I wrote in my January 8 endorsement of Putin for president of the United States:

Putin understands how to exercise power. Unlike Iraq, the restive Muslim province of Chechnya now nestles comfortably in Putin's palm, albeit with about half the people it had a decade ago. Russian troops killed between 35,000 and 100,000 civilians in the first Chechen war of 1994-96, and half a million were driven from their homes, totaling about half the population. But that is not what pacified Chechnya. Putin bribed and bullied Chechen clans to do Russia's dirty work for it, showing himself a master at the game of divide-and-conquer. Working from a position of weakness, Russia's president is the closest the modern world comes to the insidious strategic genius of a Cardinal Richelieu. That is the sort of strategic thinking America needs.

Half the world's population now resides in the world's three largest countries, namely China, India and the United States. These are not multi-ethnic, but rather supra-ethnic states, whose identity transcends tribe and nationality. There is no "clash of civilizations", for Confucian, Hindu, American and Orthodox civilization cannot find grounds for a clash. As for the European community, its global ambitions succumbed to geriatric disease a generation ago.

The number of flashpoints for violence in the world has grown in inverse proportion to their importance. The world is full of undead tribes with delusions of grandeur, and soon-to-be-extinct peoples who rather would go out with a bang than a whimper. The supra-ethnic states of the world have a common interest in containing the mischief that might be made by the losers. China, which has an annoying terrorist problem in its Westernmost province, has plenty of reason to help suppress Muslim separatists.

Unfortunately, modern weapons technology makes it possible for a spoiler state to inflict a disproportionate amount of damage. China recognized this when it cooperated with the United States to defuse the North Korean nuclear problem. The most visible prospective spoiler in the pack remains Iran. If America wants to recover from its humiliation in the Caucasus, it might, for example, conduct an air raid against Iran's nuclear facilities, and justify it with the same sort of reasoning that Russia invoked in Georgia. Contrary to surface impressions, Moscow wouldn't mind a bit
Link


Africa Horn
Int'l court to seek arrest of Sudan's president for war crimes in Darfur
2008-07-11

They're going after General Giant Epaulets?
The prosecutor at the international criminal court is widely expected to seek the arrest on Monday of the Sudanese president, Omar al-Bashir, for war crimes committed in Darfur. The prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, issued a statement yesterday announcing that he would be submitting evidence "on crimes committed in the whole of Darfur over the last five years". The statement said he would then publicly "summarise the evidence, the crimes and name individual(s) charged".

Moreno-Ocampo told the security council last month that he intended to go after top Sudanese officials, saying the "entire state apparatus" was involved in systematic attacks on civilians.
No kidding. Wage law, pal, let's see how you do ...
Legal sources and human rights activists said last night said they expected the prosecutor to name Bashir. One source with links to both the ICC and the Khartoum government said yesterday: "It's going ahead on Monday."

Reports from Khartoum said that security was being stepped up in the Sudanese capital in anticipation of an announcement, while aid workers were making contingency plans to evacuate non-essential personnel in the event of a government backlash against the international community.
I'd evacuate the essential ones too. You never know ...
"The UN has gone into panic mode," one aid official said, expressing fears that the government could retaliate by curbing or even expelling the joint UN-African Union peacekeeping force, Unamid, that is slowly deploying in the region.

Alex de Waal, an expert on Sudan at the Social Science Research Council in New York, said it was unclear how the Sudanese president would react. "The word is from those very close to Bashir that Bashir is obsessed with the idea that the world is out to get him. He already feels he has been humiliated and made to look weak," De Waal said.
And we all know what happens when a Moose-limb is humiliated and made to look weak ...
Moreno-Ocampo will be presenting evidence to a pre-trial tribunal at the ICC on Monday. It will be up to that tribunal to decide whether to pursue an indictment, a decision that could take several weeks. The security council would then decide whether to take any action on any subsequent arrest warrant.
And after a year or two they'd approve the warrant, which would go to Interpol, which would serve it when it was safe to do, after which Bashir would be dragged off to a high-class villa in Holland to await Carla del Ponte as his prosecutor in front of the court. I can see that happening in about, oh, 2018 or so ...
The ICC issued warrants last year for two Sudanese suspects, a government minister and a militia commander, for organising attacks in Darfur, where more than 200,000 people have been killed and 2.5 million have been made homeless since a revolt broke out in the western Sudanese province in 2003. Bashir has refused to cooperate, vowing the suspects would be handed over "over my dead body".
I rather imagine he has the same dim view of a warrant with his own name on it ...
Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, met Bashir on Wednesday in Khartoum and urged him to cooperate with the ICC, but it is thought unlikely that the Sudanese leader would drop his defiant stance.
'unlikely' is Guardian speak for 'no chance in hell'.
British policy is to support the work of the ICC, but officials are concerned about the impact of an announcement not only in Darfur, but also on a fragile peace agreement in southern Sudan, which could collapse entirely if the radical elements of the southern Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement turn it against a power-sharing agreement with Bashir. British officials are likely to avoid comment until and unless the court issues a warrant.

David Hoile, the head of a pro-Khartoum lobby group, the European-Sudanese Public Affairs Council, said: "The perception in Khartoum is that the ICC is on dodgy ground legally. The official policy is to ignore it. I've heard the argument in Khartoum that it's white man's justice. It's focused entirely on Africa, and has done nothing on Iraq or Afghanistan."
The Euros have their big brother handling those ...
"If the ICC go after Bashir, it will have very negative effects. It tells the rebel movements in Darfur to wait it out and the government will be changed by the ICC. The whole thing is not going to turn out well," Hoile said.

Tom Porteous, the London director of Human Rights Watch, said the organisation "has been documenting human rights abuses in Darfur since the beginning of the conflict in 2003 and certainly since 2005 we have had enough evidence that very serious war crimes and crimes and humanity have been committed. And we have recommended that the ICC investigate right the way up the chain of command, including Omar Bashir."

Moreno-Ocampo's office will be presenting its new case amid intense controversy over its role. Its prosecution of a Congolese warlord, Thomas Lubanga, collapsed this month when the court ruled it had wrongly withheld evidence that could help the defence. Lubanga's release was blocked by the ICC's appeals chamber.

William Schabas, the head of the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, said: "This is a very decisive moment for the court. It has been going through a terrible period, this could revive its image and make people feel it's a robust dynamic institution, or it could be another blow."
Or they could do lunch ...
...and have Carla Del Ponte warming up in the bullpen.
Link


Europe
Kosovo compromise impossible, envoy says
2007-12-03
There is no chance of a compromise being found on the future of the breakaway Serbian province of Kosovo, a member of a troika of foreign envoys said ahead of their visit Monday to Belgrade and Pristina. "After intensive efforts made during the past 120 days in finding common points, I think there are no additional options that would lead towards a Kosovo status solution based on compromise," EU mediator Wolfgang Ischinger told the daily Blic.

Ischinger and his co-negotiators, Russia's Alexander Botsan-Kharchenko and Frank Wisner of the United States, are to discuss their draft report on Kosovo with the rival Serbian and Kosovo Albanian camps on Monday.

Leaders of Kosovo's Albanian majority insist they will proclaim independence soon after the envoys give their final report to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on December 10. Serbia is prepared only to grant wide autonomy.

The international community fears such a move might inflame tensions and spill over into violence that leads to an exodus of Serbs from tiny enclaves in the Balkan territory. As a result, NATO last week reinforced its 17,000-strong KFOR peacekeeping mission in Kosovo with US and German troops, mainly in the Serb-dominated north of the province.

In his comments to Blic, Ischinger admitted a "possible scenario" would be that the leaders of Kosovo's 90-percent ethnic Albanians unilaterally declare independence. "My impression is that this step shall be coordinated to the possible extent, with the EU, US and other countries. One thing is clear: the status quo is unsustainable and a decision is necessary.

"As regards the question how the international community should act towards the status of Kosovo after December 10, you shall get different replies at the capitals of EU, Russia and the US."

Kosovo has been run by a United Nations mission since 1999, when NATO bombing drove out Belgrade-controlled forces waging a crackdown on separatist Albanian guerrillas and their civilian supporters.

"It would be very difficult for the troika to suggest what should be done after December 10. We shall leave that to our governments to decide," said Ischinger. "The report we are going to submit to the UN secretary general shall contain the whole course of the troika's participation in the negotiations," said the German diplomat.

"It shall be also mentioned in it how and to what extent the parties have cooperated with us."

Serbia, which considers Kosovo its historic heartland, insists the process should end in the UN Security Council, where it has the support of its veto-wielding ally Russia.

The troubled country will also play host Monday to chief UN war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte on her final visit to Belgrade before her mandate expires on December 31. Del Ponte will hold talks with leaders on Serbia's cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which is key to its EU membership ambitions.

Belgrade is under pressure to capture three of the four remaining fugitives of the ICTY, which is based in The Hague. Chief among them is Ratko Mladic, a former Bosnian Serb general wanted for genocide over the 1995 Srebrenica massacre of 8,000 Muslim men and boys -- the worst atrocity in Europe since World War II.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Brammertz warns: Hariri killers able to strike again
2007-11-30
U.N. officials investigating the killing of Lebanon's former Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri warned on Wednesday that those who carried out the attack still had the ability and resources to strike again in Beirut.

In his latest report on the U.N. investigative commission, Belgian prosecutor Serge Brammertz said he had made progress on the Hariri investigation in recent months and was able to draw preliminary conclusions about important aspects and to identify more people involved.

Since his last report in July, Brammertz said tension had been high in Lebanon, which is going through a protracted crisis over the election of a president to succeed pro-Syrian Emile Lahoud, whose term expired last week. "The commission notes that evidence uncovered in the Hariri and some of the other attacks, including the recent assassination of Antoine Ghanem, confirms the fact that the perpetrators had and still have advanced and extensive operational capacities available in Beirut," Brammertz said. Ghanem, an anti-Syrian Christian member of parliament, was among seven people killed by a car bomb in September.

Brammertz said the tense security environment was affecting the commission's work and warned that after the failure to elect a president last week, "the prospect of a rapid deterioration cannot be excluded."

WITNESS PROTECTION
Brammertz said the investigative commission needed to restrict the information it made public to avoid jeopardizing the probe and endangering individuals, and he recommended setting up a witness protection program. He said recent developments had led to the identification of "additional persons of interest" but he gave no names.

Brammertz has said in the past that a likely motive for the attack was the role of Hariri, who became a prominent critic of Syria, in support of a 2004 U.N. resolution demanding that Syrian and other foreign troops withdraw from Lebanon. In the latest report, he said Syria had been generally cooperative with the investigation.

Brammertz also is investigating 18 other political murders or attempted murders in Lebanon and he said the commission would focus on establishing links to the Hariri case.

It was Brammertz's last report to the Security Council before his mandate expires at the end of this year, when he will be replaced by Canadian prosecutor Daniel Bellemare.

The commission is due to hand over its findings to a special tribunal that is being established in the Netherlands. Starting Jan. 1, Brammertz will take over as prosecutor of the Hague-based international tribunal for former Yugoslavia, replacing Switzerland's Carla Del Ponte. His appointment was approved on Wednesday by the U.N. Security Council.
Link


Europe
The Russian option
2007-10-19
Some Serbs dream of a Russian alternative to the European Union

DOTTED across the Serbian north of the divided city of Mitrovica are pictures of its hero: Vladimir Putin. Russia, Kosovo's Serbs believe, has saved them from the independence demanded by its Albanians (Kosovars), who make up 90% of Kosovo's 2m people. It is too early to be sure they are right. But Western diplomats are worried by Serbia's dalliance with Russia.

Marko Jaksic, a member of Serbia's Kosovo negotiating team, helps to run northern Kosovo. He is a deputy leader of the party of Vojislav Kostunica, Serbia's prime minister. If America and many European Union countries recognise a unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo, he expects Serbia to offer Russia military bases “in Serbia, and especially on the border of Kosovo”. He adds that Serbia should abandon its bid to join the EU, and claims that Mr Kostunica thinks similarly but has less freedom to talk openly.


Such talk is meant to send chills down Western spines. If Serbia gave up trying to join the EU, not only would it return to the isolation of the 1990s but it could also drag the whole region down with it. How serious is the risk? Mr Kostunica's party is aligned with Mr Putin's United Russia party, and its official position is that Serbia should be neutral. Mr Kostunica has disparaged a potentially independent Kosovo as nothing but a “NATO state”.

A source close to President Boris Tadic, whose party is in uneasy coalition with Mr Kostunica, concedes that, if Kosovo's independence is recognised, it will be hard to instil “European values” in Serbia. Even Serbs who would secretly like to be shot of their troublesome southern province fear that full independence would be disastrous. They predict that Mr Kostunica would, if not formally end the country's bid for EU membership, at least slow it down, as well as trying to punish countries that recognise Kosovo and companies that trade there and in Serbia.

Yet the Russian alternative does not look appetising. The prospect of Russian bases in Serbia is “very unlikely”, says Ivan Vejvoda, who heads the Balkan Trust for Democracy, a big regional donor to good causes. Serbia is surrounded by the EU and NATO. “The Russian thing is a temporary, opportunistic thing, a balloon which will burst once we are over Kosovo,” he says. There is much excitement in Serbia about Russian companies moving in. On the list for privatisations that may interest them are JAT Serbian airlines, Belgrade airport, a mine in Bor and NIS, Serbia's oil company. Alexei Miller, head of Russia's energy giant, Gazprom, met Serbian leaders to discuss potential pipelines on October 9th. But so far Russian companies (except for Lukoil) have been notable by their absence. Russia is only the 18th-biggest investor in Serbia; the country's largest single exporter is owned by US Steel. The EU has poured lots of money into rebuilding Serbia. If Serbia kept on track, a lot more cash could come—and Russia offers little.

On October 15th Montenegro signed a “stabilisation and association agreement” with the EU, normally a step towards membership. Serbia could soon do the same. But a negative report to the EU from Carla Del Ponte, chief prosecutor at The Hague war-crimes tribunal, means that it must first be seen to do more to catch the fugitive Ratko Mladic. Ms Del Ponte will visit Serbia soon to check progress (the government has posted a reward for the missing general, 12 years after he was indicted). This suggests that the Russian option is, as one diplomat puts it, “loose talk”—for now. If many EU countries recognise an independent Kosovo next year, it will be their turn to call Serbia's bluff.
Link


Europe
UN: Tribunal upholds Bosnian Muslim ex-army commander's acquittal
2007-10-17
The Hague (AKI) - The United Nations war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia today upheld the acquittal of a former deputy army commander for the Bosnian Muslim forces during the Balkan wars on charges related to a massacre of 13 Bosnian Croat civilians in 1993.

The appeals chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), sitting in The Hague, found that the trial chamber was correct in November 2005 to acquit Sefer Halilovic.

Halilovic, 55, had pleaded not guilty to the charge of command responsibility in the murders committed by Bosnian Muslim troops in the village of Grabovica, about 30 kilometres north of Mostar, in Bosnia and Herzegovina in September 1993.

He served as chief of the main staff of the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina at the time, and prosecutors alleged that he was the commander of a military operation known as Neretva-93 that led to the killings in Grabovica by troops billeted in the village.

But the appeals chamber said prosecutors had failed to show that it was not reasonable of the trial chamber to find that Halilovic did not have the required degree of “effective control” over the troops to establish his superior responsibility under the law.

Meanwhile, the ICTY's chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte addressed EU foreign ministers on Monday, saying that although Serbia has provided some of the requested documents and archives, its overall cooperation does not match its stated commitments to the tribunal.

Full access to some crucial archives has been denied so far, while a number of important documents have not yet been provided, she said.

She also criticised Serbia’s efforts to secure the arrest and extradition of the four remaining fugitives from the ICTY: Ratko Mladic; Radovan Karadzic; Goran Hadzic; and Stojan Zupljanin.

“I confirm that the situation today is better than it was a year ago,” Del Ponte said. “However, cooperation is still too slow and not yet sufficient. The fact that Ratko Mladic is still at large after all the promises and declarations that have been made over the years clearly demonstrates that fact.”

Karadzic, 62, the former Bosnian Serb president, and Mladic, 65, the former military chief, each face numerous charges, including genocide, extermination, murder, persecutions, deportation, taking of hostages and inflicting terror on civilians.

Hadzic, 49, is charged with murder, persecutions, torture, cruel treatment and other war crimes and crimes against humanity related to his role as president of a self-proclaimed breakaway state of rebel Serbs in southern Croatia during the early 1990s.

Zupljanin, 56, has been indicted on many counts, including murder, torture, forcible transfers and the wanton destruction of towns and villages. He served in the senior leadership in the Autonomous Region of Krajina, part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, an area that became notorious for its treatment of non-Serbs.
Link


Europe
Serbia not fully cooperating with UN war crimes court
2007-10-16
LUXEMBOURG - Serbia’s cooperation with the UN war crimes tribunal has improved but ‘is still too slow’, the court’s chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte said Monday. ‘I confirm that the situation today is better than it was a year ago,’ Del Ponte, chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY), told EU foreign ministers at a meeting in Luxembourg.

‘However, cooperation is still too slow and not yet sufficient,’ she said. ‘I cannot give a positive assessment of full cooperation until Ratko Mladic is arrested and transferred’ to the Hague-based tribunal.
"I can, however, promise all court members employment and fine dining over the next ten years," she added.
Former Bosnian Serb military chief Mladic, believed to be in hiding in Serbia, has been indicted by the UN court for warcrimes including genocide over the 1995 Srebrenica massacre of 8,000 Muslim men and boys.

Last week, Serbia offered a one million-euro (1.4 million-dollar) reward for information leading to his capture, which Del Ponte described as: ‘an encouraging sign of the Serbian authorities’ commitment to cooperate.’

The European Commission could soon initiate a key agreement on closer EU ties with Serbia if Belgrade boosts cooperation with the UN tribunal. The Commission and Serbia concluded on September 10 the technical aspects of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) -- a first step for Balkans states to join the EU. But Brussels refuses to sign it until Serbia achieves ‘full cooperation which should lead to the arrest’ of remaining war crimes indictees.

Initialling, the SAA would mean nothing in legal terms but it would be a political gesture toward Serbia amid an international dispute over the future of its southern province of Kosovo.

Del Ponte said she would return to Belgrade October 25-26 to assess progress, and visit again before she briefs the UN Security Council in December.
Platinum Amex all the way.
Link


International-UN-NGOs
War crime lawyers fight UN on top job
2007-09-23
The new leadership of the United Nations is facing a defiant challenge from within one of its few recent successes - the interminable war crimes tribunal in The Hague - over who will steer the epic trials towards their close.
Captain Smith not being available ...
Prosecution lawyers at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) - trying Europe's bloodiest war criminals since the Nazis - fear a backstage deal has been struck between new UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon over an appointment of a successor to chief prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, who finally leaves in December. Senior Hague lawyers say they are ready to quit over the issue.
Is this is another Soros-guided mission to tear down a decent man? Read on ...
Accounts by tribunal and UN sources of how a former Belgian attorney-general petitioned for the job and has reportedly been guaranteed it affords a rare insight into the veiled sanctums of the UN.

Sources at the ICTY, at UN headquarters in New York and across the world of international law and human rights advocacy, say Del Ponte's succession has been pledged in secret to Serge Brammertz, a Belgian criminologist who became deputy prosecutor at the new International Criminal Court and heads the UN commission into the murder of Lebanese premier Rafiq al-Hariri in 2005, which he wants to leave.
Since there isn't going to be a trial until about 2023, he'll have lots of time.
The entire senior prosecution staff at the tribunal have taken the unprecedented step of sending a joint letter to Ki-Moon, contesting a Brammertz appointment by proposing Del Ponte's current deputy David Tolbert, who has worked for nine years at the tribunal, for the job. 'The matter is not one of personalities nor Brammertz's standing', says one lawyer. 'It's the difference between someone who knows the history, understands every case and can deliver a completion strategy, or someone brought in by the Secretary General just to shut the tribunal down, with no experience of the cases, background or region.'
So Tolbert could always stay as deputy. Make him 'senior chief deputy'. Makes you wonder what deals have been struck. Maybe Assad is a smarter operator than we give him credit for ...
Ki-Moon's office will not comment, citing confidentiality of the appointments procedure. But the lawyers' view is backed unanimously by organisations with an interest in the tribunal's work, including the George Soros Foundation, Human Rights Watch and campaigners within former Yugoslavia itself, all of whom have also petitioned Ki-Moon.
And there it is, Soros and HRW, linked at the hip and lips ...
'Just because people haven't heard of the names remaining to stand trial doesn't mean that they are not the most important cases,' says Kelly Askin, senior legal officer at the Soros Foundation. 'It's crucial that there be continuity - and the fact is we have someone available who knows the institution and the people, and has followed every case and every detail for nine years. Several senior staff have told me they will leave the tribunal if David Tolbert is not appointed.'
Does Mr. Tolbert live in a rent-free apartment? Does Mr. Tolbert have links to Soros-funded groups? Does he play nice with all the various 'human rights' groups?
The ICTY has had a bumpy journey since it was established under pressure from then President Bill Clinton's Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, in 1994. It was seen at the time as an act of contrition after the UN's catastrophic failure to intervene as hundreds of thousands died in three years of savage 'ethnic cleansing' in Bosnia, culminating with the massacre of 8,000 men and boys at the UN-protected 'Safe Area' of Srebrenica in July 1995.

The tribunal lost its biggest catch with the death in a hotel country club resort prison of former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic, and is haunted by the failure to catch the two Bosnian Serb leaders accused of unleashing the genocide in Bosnia - General Ratko Mladic and former President Radovan Karadzic. Their capture would extend the tribunal's mandate beyond 2010, and make for a climactic end-game; Del Ponte made what could be her final trip to Belgrade this week as a last-ditch attempt to secure, under her watch, the two leaders.
Worked well, didn't it. Carla gets to leave the job as incompetent as she was when she started ...
But for all the publicity over Karadzic and Mladic, the tribunal - the first of its kind since the Nuremberg trials - has seen remarkable successes.
Especially by Y'urp-peon standards.
Even apart from the convictions secured, accounts of the slaughter have been told for the historical record in intimate language from the witness boxes. There have been dramatic moments as killers and leaders have been confronted by victims.

The tribunal won a guilty plea from Karadzic's co-President Biljana Plavsic, for her role in the overall planning of war crimes.
Petty ante. The big boys used her as a fall girl ...
New laws of war have been written: the Serb siege of Sarajevo was deemed a war crime, as was the use of systematic mass rape as a means of persecution at Foca, in Eastern Bosnia.
Because no one had ever thought that indisriminate slaughter and rape were war crimes before 1992 ...
But crucial trials are outstanding or still in process - the leadership of the Bosnian Croat war machine, which laid murderous siege to East Mostar and set up a gulag for Muslims, is currently standing trial; notorious paramilitary warlord Milan Lukic awaits trial, accused of locking scores of families in houses and burning them alive in Visegrad. Above all, Momcilo Peresic - Milosevic's most senior general - is also due for trial. It is a critical case, because a conviction would establish Serbia's direct involvement in the genocide which we've all known for a long time, in stark counterpoint to a ruling by the International Court of Justice, which rejected a case by the Bosnian government against Serbia for its involvement in genocide.

The team that convicted Krstic, Krajsnik and those preparing the cases against Lukic and Peresic all are signatories to the letter to Ki-Moon.

An ICTY statement last week said del Ponte's mandate had been extended until 31 December. 'The successor to the current prosecutor has not yet been appointed yet,' it said.

Mark Ellis, of the London-based International Bar Association, said: 'It struck me as very odd that the UN would make a decision which would in essence put a newcomer in charge.'
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Poirot expected to be lead prosecutor at war crimes tribunal
2007-07-05
The chief prosecutor at the war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Carla Del Ponte, is expected to be succeeded by Serge Brammertz, UN officials in The Hague and in New York said.

Brammertz, a Belgian criminologist, has been invited to take up the prosecutor's post at the UN tribunal in The Hague in December, when his mandate in Lebanon expires, the officials said Wednesday. Brammertz, seen as the strongest candidate for the job, has accepted, the officials said. He could not be reached immediately for comment.

Del Ponte's second term expires in September, and she has said she wants to step down. She has been asked to stay on until the end of the year, or at least until her successor is able to take over, said the officials. Last Wednesday, in an interview in the office she has occupied for almost eight years, Del Ponte said she would be willing to stay on but was awaiting formal approval from the Swiss government, still nominally her employer since her days as the Swiss attorney general.
Just go already.
Link


Europe
EU Asked to Fund War Crimes Tribunal
2006-09-30
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) - Chief war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte suggested Friday the European Union take over financing of the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal if the United Nations cuts off funds before the court can bring its most-wanted fugitives to trial. Del Ponte said Europeans have a responsibility to keep the tribunal going because its two most-wanted men, former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic and former army chief Gen. Ratko Mladic, are believed to be hiding with the help of Serbian officials or supporters.
And she's still hoping to convict someone, someday.
The Yugoslav tribunal - created in 1993 by the U.N. Security Council to prosecute suspected war criminals in the Balkan wars - has been asked by the United Nations to start its final trials no later than the end of 2008. The U.N. allocates more than $300 million a year for the tribunal's operations.
“The U.N. allocates more than $300 million a year for the tribunal's operations.”
$300 mil a year and not one big shot jugged. Sounds like the U.N., doesn't it?
Del Ponte said the deadline set by the U.N. should "not allow persons accused of the worst crimes in the history of mankind to escape justice." She made the comments in a speech in Helsinki, Finland, that was distributed by the court.
How about letting someone else run the show? I bet even Patrick Fitzgerald could be more productive.
The Security Council is likely to decide next year whether to let the tribunal continue if necessary, but Russia was likely to veto an extension, she said. If that happens, accused war criminals may get "a passport to impunity."
Unlike today, where they have a visa to snicker at you.
The tribunal has indicted 161 people, with Serb defendants outnumbering other ethnic groups. Serbs often accuse the court of being biased against them.
“The tribunal has indicted 161 people, with Serb defendants outnumbering other ethnic groups.”
161 indicted and not one bigshot convicted. Nice record, Carla.
Mladic and Karadzic were both indicted in 1995 on charges of orchestrating the massacre of some 8,000 Muslims in the U.N. enclave of Srebrenica - Europe's worst carnage since World War II. Belgrade's failure to capture Mladic has led to suspension of its pre-entry talks with the European Union. Serbia has maintained it has been unable to locate him. Del Ponte has said that Karadzic is believed to be hiding in the Serb-controlled half of Bosnia.
Brilliant, Carla, how do you do it?
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More