Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
France, allies look to save Iran stoning woman |
2010-08-17 |
[Al Arabiya Latest] France and its European allies are looking for a way to work together to save an Iranian woman who was sentenced to death for adultery, the French foreign ministry said Monday. Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani, a 43-year-old mother-of-two, was initially sentenced to death by stoning, although this has reportedly been changed to hanging, and her case has caused worldwide condemnation. "France and its European partners are currently studying all means that can be put into action to ensure the sentence against Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani is not carried out," ministry spokeswoman Christine Fages told reporters. The ministry was reacting after figures including Nobel laureates Wole Soyinka and Jody Williams, Czech author Milan Kundera, singer and anti-poverty campaigner Bob Geldof and actress Juliette Binoche appealed for action. French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy organized a petition and an open letter was published in French daily, urging world leaders to come to the woman's defense. "Urgent intervention is necessary to prevent an execution that observers believe is imminent," said the text published in France's Liberation newspaper |
Link |
Home Front: Politix | |
How George W Bush became an African hero | |
2008-07-08 | |
![]() Under Mr Bush's leadership, America is firmly among the countries who Oliver Buston, a prominent campaigner specialising in tracking the G8's promises, calls the 'good guys'. Mr Buston places America among the G8 nations doing everything possible to redeem the Gleneagles pledge on raising aid budgets. In the last year of Bill Clinton's presidency, America's direct bilateral assistance to Africa was only Pounds 700 million. Mr Bush has almost quadrupled this sum. Combating Aids once played virtually no part in America's development policies. Mr Bush has established the biggest fund ever devoted to fighting an epidemic. The President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief, funded to the tune of Pounds 7.5 billion, is paying for hundreds of thousands of Africans to receive the life-saving drugs which hold Aids at bay. Mr Bush has also made America the biggest single donor to the Global Fund for Aids, tuberculosis and malaria, contributing one third of its Pounds 5 billion. No other leader has given as much money to the World Food Programme as Mr Bush. America now provides about half of all the emergency food aid distributed across the globe. Countries which desperately need this help often have viscerally anti-American governments. The rulers of Sudan and Zimbabwe, where millions depend on emergency food supplies, probably do not grasp the irony of the man they vilify keeping so many of their own people alive. Bob Geldof, the anti-poverty campaigner, has often praised Mr Bush's 'Africa story'. Overall, however, this side of the president's legacy has earned him few votes and precious little international credit. The point, as Mr Geldof stresses, is that Mr Bush helped Africa anyway.
| |
Link |
-Short Attention Span Theater- | ||||
Al-Gormand criticised for lining his own pockets after £3,300/minute green speech | ||||
2007-12-10 | ||||
![]() Red Dawg, I hear she like spanking and says 'no' a lot! :-) Al Gore has come under fire for making personal gain from his mission to save the planet after charging £3,300 a minute to deliver a poorly received speech. What? Were they all scientists or something? The former American Vice-President was also accused of being "precious" at the London event, demanding his own VIP room and ejecting journalists, despite hopes the star-studded gathering would generate publicity for the fight against global warming.
The glittering fundraiser was held in The Royal Courts of Justice and attracted world leaders, entrepreneurs and celebrity activists including Bob Geldof, Darryl Hannah and Jerry Hall, who was there as "a Special Ambassador of The Alliance for a New Humanity". Guests had paid between £1,000 and £50,000 to attend. But a source told The Mail on Sunday: "Many guests looked tired and began to talk among themselves during his speech. Heads began to twitch with tiredness. Where the fuc& is Renu? I didn't pay £50,000 to look at this guy! "Al uses his position for great personal gain. He goes from event to event delivering a similar speech, earning a large fee, and a lot of the time he doesn't actually inform the audience. "He refused to speak to journalists and security would usher away VIP guests and the Press. "He was being very precious and demanded his own VIP room before the event, where he held his own exclusive reception. "The other guests were cut off. It was very clear that many guests were disappointed by this."
"We had to apologise to people who were invited. We wanted to say thank you for all the support that many people had given us, but some of them were asked to leave. "Many guests were invited by the hosts, so why should the speaker have any control over these guests and removing the media? It defeated the object of trying to raise awareness of the cause." A source added: "Al had two people working for him: a woman who was his assistant and a male security officer who enrolled the help of security guards at The Royal Courts of Justice in a military-style operation to guard Al Gore. They took over the show." However, a spokesman for Mr Gore, who won his Oscar for the polemic documentary An Inconvenient Truth, told The Mail on Sunday: "Mr Gore donates a "With regards to the media arrangements, some of Mr Gore's events are open to the media, some of them are not. As you know, he has many open events coming up, including the Nobel Peace Prize. "Unfortunately, this event had more limited availability. I do apologise for that. He does do his best to speak to reporters as often as possible." Fortune Forum, which was founded by socialite ex-model Renu Mehta last year with the aim of attracting wealthy philanthropists to large-scale social and environmental projects, declined to comment. That went well, didn't it? Better donate that £100,000 to charity, Al. Quick.
| ||||
Link |
Britain | |||
Benazir to star with Al Gore | |||
2007-12-01 | |||
![]() The second annual Fortune Forum Summit will take place at Londons Royal Courts of Justice. Nobel Peace Prize winner Gore will be the keynote speaker. Campaigning musicians Sir Bob Geldof and Damien Rice will attend, as well as Daryl Hannah, Jerry Hall, Bianca Jagger, Gillian Anderson, Lily Cole, Joseph Fiennes, Christian Slater and Sir David Frost and surprise guests.
| |||
Link |
Africa Horn |
China Accused of Prolonging Sudan Bloodshed |
2006-04-11 |
(CNSNews.com) - The continuing carnage in Sudan's Darfur region is dragging on because of China's support for the Islamist government in Khartoum, according to Irish celebrity campaigner for Africa, Bob Geldof. "The reason why it has not been resolved is because of China," the Associated Press quoted Geldof as saying in Athens on Monday. "The Chinese protect the Khartoum government, who are killers, and they will not allow a vote in the [U.N.] Security Council," he said, attributing Beijing's stance to its oil ties with Sudan. The characteristically candid Geldof, organizer of last year's Live 8 global charity event, was in the Greek capital to receive a humanitarian award. Beijing's state-controlled China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) owns 40 percent of Sudan's biggest oil operation. An estimated 6 to 7 percent of China's oil imports come from Sudan, a figure expected to rise as the industry expands after a two-decades-long civil war. U.S. Department of Energy figures now place Sudan third in sub-Saharan Africa for crude oil production, behind Nigeria and Angola. Since a conflict broke out in Darfur between government-sponsored militias and rebel groups three years ago, many thousands of people have perished and two million more have been displaced. The U.N. has described Darfur as the world's worst humanitarian crisis. As early as July 2004, veto-wielding member China was using its clout in the Security Council to ease international pressure on Khartoum. Resistance from China -- together with fellow permanent council member Russia and several of the body's non-permanent members, notably Islamic Pakistan and Algeria -- resulted in the U.S. agreeing to drop the word "sanctions" from a draft resolution on Darfur. In the end, the watered-down resolution was passed by a 13-0 vote. Although the sanctions reference had been removed, Beijing could still not support it because, China's envoy Zhang Yishan said, "it still included references to measures that were not helpful and which could further complicate the situation." China abstained, along with Pakistan. In the 21 months since then, the death toll in Darfur has risen from some 30,000-50,000 to an estimated 180,000 today. By February last year, the U.S. and European allies were still struggling to get China and Russia to agree to impose sanctions against Sudan. The State Department said at the time that those under discussion included oil sanctions, as well as an extension of an existing arms embargo, a freeze on assets and travel ban against specified individuals or government officials. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Virginia), a co-chairman of the bipartisan congressional human rights caucus, said at a press conference on Darfur that month that China and Russia had "repeatedly threatened to veto resolutions that could possibly bring an end to the violence." Wolf, who has visited Sudan five times, is currently pressing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to appoint a special envoy to the country, to focus further attention on the Darfur issue. Testifying before the congressional U.S.-China Commission last July, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow for Africa policy studies Princeton Lyman also linked China's Security Council stance to its oil dealings with Sudan. "China had become its biggest [oil] customer," he said. "Meanwhile, China has successfully prevented the U.N. Security Council from serious sanctions or other preventive measures in face of the alleged genocide and crimes against humanity perpetrated in the Darfur region of that country." Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick said in a major policy speech on China last September that it was time to urge a rising China to become "a responsible stakeholder" in the international system, for instance by using its considerable influence with such regimes as those ruling Sudan and Iran. "China should take more than oil from Sudan - it should take some responsibility for resolving Sudan's human crisis," said Zoellick, who has himself traveled to the north-east African country four times over the past year. Meanwhile, Beijing's relations with Khartoum appear to be strengthening. Chinese defense minister Cao Gangchuan held talks with his Sudanese counterpart, Abdel Rahim Mohamed Hussein, in Beijing two weeks ago, and said the People's Liberation Army was "ready to deepen the cooperation" with the Sudanese military. Hussein, who was described as being on "an official goodwill visit," praised China's stance on the Darfur issue, the official Xinhua news agency reported. At another meeting, a senior Chinese official thanked the Sudanese visitor for Khartoum's "firm support on major international issues, such as human rights." Additional: Beijing - Irish rocker Bob Geldof's accusation that Beijing is to blame for the continuing civil war in Sudan would have more bite if China knew who he was. On Tuesday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Liu Jianchao said he'd never heard of anti-poverty campaigner and Live 8 organiser Geldof. Asking "Who?" several times, Liu finally shook his head and said "I am sorry" after a reporter asked for comment on the 51-year-old Irish rocker's claims that China was protecting the Sudanese government because it provides six percent of China's oil. "Anyway, I can brief you on China's position on Sudan," Liu said. "We are making efforts to restore peace in Sudan. We hope both parties can implement the agreements reached. We hope to see a stronger role for the African Union in solving the Sudan problem." Liu didn't respond directly to the claim that China is protecting the Khartoum government because of its oil needs. Geldof has won international acclaim for his humanitarian efforts and last year organised the Live 8 benefit concerts. "I was in Darfur 20 years ago and people were killing each other then. It's an ancient battle between nomadic people and settled people, between Arab-Africans and black Africans, between Islam and Christians. ... The reason why it has not been resolved is because of China," Geldof said in Athens on Monday. "The Chinese protect the Khartoum government ... and they will not allow a vote in the Security Council," he said. |
Link |
Europe |
Karl Marx Was Really a Free-Marketeer (really!), Says Attali |
2005-08-30 |
What is old, is new again. Karl Marx was a closet capitalist. So writes French author Jacques Attali in ``Karl Marx ou l'esprit du monde'' (Fayard, 504 pages, 23 euros.) Attali argues that the theoretician widely blamed for the rise and fall of the Soviet Union was actually a free-marketeer who favored capitalism as a stepping stone to his communist ideal and predicted globalization as we know it today. That, he says, makes Marx the thinker du jour. Sales of his book suggest he may be right, at least in France: ``Karl Marx'' ranks among the country's non-fiction bestsellers. I think that says more about France than it says about KM. Like his subject, Attali is something of an overachiever. He graduated from four of France's elite ``grandes ecoles,'' finishing top of his graduating class at the Ecole Polytechnique engineering school. When the late Francois Mitterrand became president of France in 1981, Attali, then 38, moved into the adjacent office as his special adviser. Some of his ideas later became reality: the Grande Bibliotheque, the giant library in eastern Paris, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, based in London. Today, Attali is president of PlaNet Finance, a federation of some 10,000 micro-lenders that provide funding to the poorest of the poor. He is also the author of 37 books, including novels, children's stories and a play. The topic of his 38th? Mitterrand, his one-time mentor, who died a decade ago. Free Marx On a rainy day last week, Attali settled into a red armchair at Bloomberg's Paris bureau and, between sips of Earl Grey tea, shared his views on Marx, the world and the future. Nayeri: In your biography, you say Marx has become relevant to the world today. How so? Attali: Marx was understood as the thinker of Marxism and, more than that, a thinker of Sovietism. Actually, Marxism and Sovietism were built after Marx, and against him. Marx was a thinker of globalization. He was strongly against the idea of taking power for socialism in one country, strongly against the idea that communism could come instead of capitalism. For him, socialism should come after capitalism spreads everywhere in the world, including China and India. Ironically, he explained that the one country where socialism cannot begin is Russia, which is too backward. True, but that is because Marx believed in historism (ref Karl Popper and The Poverty of Historicism) For Marx, capitalism was huge progress compared to the previous feudal system. Therefore, he was strongly in favor of capitalism as progress toward liberty for mankind. He was in favor of free markets. He was in favor of free trade, explicitly; against protectionism, explicitly. And he explained that socialism, therefore, should come after. Beyond Capitalism Nayeri: Do you think that the world according to Marx will ever see the day? Attali: I'm sure there will be something beyond capitalism. It is clear that capitalism will win against the previous regime. It will take a lot of time, there will be some fights against theocracies as well as dictatorships. But I believe capitalism is not here forever, meaning more than one, two, three or five centuries. Wow! a Marxist gets a clue and predicts we will win against the Islamonuts. What is beyond capitalism is a world of free things and (things of) no value, and what we see on the Internet, in (downloaded) music ... is exactly that: the beginning of a world where some things, or everything, will or may become free. Nayeri: Do you think the U.S. and the West will lose their political and economic dominance of the planet in 50 years' time? Attali: In 50 years, no. But there is no empire forever, just as there is no civilization forever, and it's clear that the American empire, like the Roman Empire, will begin to decline, and is beginning to decline. As we saw with the Roman Empire, the decline took more than four centuries to happen and what happened after that was a disaster. The fatal blow to the Roman Empire was abrupt climate cooling, so with climate warming (TM) there is no risk of the same fate. Anarchy or Governance? The question is how long the decline of the American empire will take, and for me, it will be very long. What will happen after will be global anarchy, such as happened in the early Middle Ages, or the beginning of global governance, if we see a victory of democracy. Nayeri: Bob Geldof famously said he would like to make poverty history. As the president of PlaNet Finance, do you consider that aim possible? Attali: It is needed. I don't know if it is possible. We see that poverty is one of the main sources of violence; terrorism finds its sources in poverty, and poverty finds its sources in violence. Bullshit and demonstrably untrue. But I don't believe that the instruments that Bob is proposing, such as debt relief, are the most efficient ones, because debt relief means debt relief of governments, and the debt of governments is made for buying weapons or whatever. It is more important to help the very poorest to get out of debt. It's what micro-finance is about. I actually agree with him on microfinance. Its perhaps the most important way of jump-starting capitalism in the developing world. |
Link |
Africa: Subsaharan | |||
Paved With Good Intentions | |||
2005-07-12 | |||
The first time Bono and Madonna got together to save Africa, the unintended consequence was the death of perhaps as many as 100,000 people. That's aid expert David Rieff's conclusion in the July 2005 issue of the resolutely liberal American Prospect magazine regarding the end result of Live Aid in 1985. Billed as "The Greatest Show on Earth," Live Aid was a multi-venue rock concert held on July 13, 1985 in London and Philadelphia in order to raise money for famine relief in Ethiopia. With an estimated 1.5 billion viewers watching the live broadcast in 100 countries, the event reportedly raised $250 million. The money was supposed to go towards relieving hunger. In reality, argues Rieff, the rock stars and well-intentioned donors became unwilling participants in a civil war and unwitting supporters of a Soviet-style resettlement project that vastly increased the severity of the famine.
As Francois Jean of the medical aid organization Medecins Sans Frontiers (MSF) described it at the time, the Mengistu regime was employing "shock treatment in order to transform Ethiopian rural society." Comparing the Ethiopian resettlement policy to its Chinese and Soviet predecessors, Francois Jean wrote that all three terror famines "proceeded from the same approach to reality, the same vision of the future, the same extreme commitment to radical social transformation." This famine-inducing resettlement policy in Ethiopia, the movement of 600,000 people from the north and the "villagization" of millions of others, was "at least in part a military campaign, masquerading as a humanitarian effort," concludes Rieff. "And it was assisted by Western aid money." Initially, few people came forward when the authorities in Ethiopia called for volunteers for the resettlement plan. "The response was swift," explains Rieff. "A campaign of systemic round-ups in towns and villages across three targeted provinces began. Those caught up in these sweeps were either airlifted south or transferred by land, sometimes in vehicles the authorities had requisitioned from international relief agencies -- vehicles that were there to transport foodstuffs. The trip usually took five or six days. To this day, no one knows how many people died in route. The conservative estimate is 50,000. MSF's estimate is double that." "We are witnessing the biggest deportation since the Khmer Rouge genocide," charged MSF's president, Claude Malhuret, in late 1985. In an exercise of deadly compassion, humanitarian "aid to victims was unwittingly transformed into support to their executioners."
When asked about these unintended consequences, concert organizer Bob Geldof seemed to have few second thoughts. "The organizations that are participating in the resettlement program should not be criticized," he told the Irish Times on November 4, 1985. "In my opinion, we've got to give aid without worrying about population transfers."
This time around, Chris Martin, the frontman of Coldplay and a former student in World Studies at London's University College, told the Live 8 audience that the July 2, 2005 concerts were "the greatest thing that's ever been organized, probably, in the history of the world." Imagine that! Getting Bono and Madonna together for another afternoon shot at saving Africa is bigger than D-Day, a bigger and greater achievement in organization than the putting together of the invading force of 11,000 airplanes, 5,000 ships, and over 150,000 troops that broke Germany's grip on western Europe and foreshadowed the end of Hitler's dream of turning the planet into a Nazi hellhole. Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. | |||
Link |
Europe |
The quiet-life option ensures that attacks go on |
2005-07-08 |
Another Mark Steyn reaction on the London bombings. One way of measuring any terrorist attack is to look at whether the killers accomplished everything they set out to. On September 11, 2001, al-Qa'eda set out to hijack four planes and succeeded in seizing every one. Had the killers attempted to take another 30 jets between 7.30 and nine that morning, who can doubt that they'd have maintained their pristine 100 per cent success rate? Throughout the IRA's long war against us, two generations of British politicians pointed out that there would always be the odd "crack in the system" through which the determined terrorist would slip. But on 9/11 the failure of the system was total. Yesterday, al-Qa'eda hit three Tube trains and one bus. Had they broadened their attentions from the central zone, had they attempted to blow up 30 trains from Uxbridge to Upminster, who can doubt that they too would have been successful? In other words, the scale of the carnage was constrained only by the murderers' ambition and their manpower. The difference is that 9/11 hit out of the blue - literally and politically; 7/7 came after four years of Her Majesty's Government prioritising terrorism and "security" above all else - and the failure rate was still 100 per cent. After the Madrid bombing, I was struck by the spate of comic security breaches in London: two Greenpeace guys shin up St Stephen's Tower, a Mirror reporter blags his way into a servants' gig at Buckingham Palace a week before Bush comes to stay; an Osama lookalike gatecrashes Prince William's party. As I wrote in The Daily Telegraph last March, "History repeats itself: farce, farce, farce, but sooner or later tragedy is bound to kick in. The inability of the state to secure even the three highest-profile targets in the realm - the Queen, her heir, her Parliament - should remind us that a defensive war against terrorism will ensure terrorism." To three high-profile farces, we now have that high-profile tragedy, of impressive timing. It's not a question of trying and prodding and testing and finding the weak link in the chain, the one day - on Monday or Wednesday, in January or November, when an immigration official or a luggage checker is a bit absent-minded and distracted and you slip quietly through. Instead, the jihad, via one of its wholly owned but independently operated subsidiaries, scheduled an atrocity for the start of the G8 summit and managed to pull it off - at a time when ports and airports and internal security were all supposed to be on heightened alert. That's quite a feat. Of course, many resources had been redeployed to Scotland to cope with Bob Geldof's pathetic call for a million anti-globalist ninnies to descend on the G8 summit. In theory, the anti-glob mob should be furious with al-Qa'eda and its political tin ear for ensuring that their own pitiful narcissist protests - the pâpier-maché Bush and Blair puppets, the ethnic drumming, etc - will be crowded off the news bulletins. But I wonder. It seems just as plausible that there will be as many supple self-deluding figures anxious to argue that it's Blair's Iraq war and the undue attention it invites from excitable types that's preventing us from ending poverty in Africa by the end of next week and all the other touchy-feely stuff. The siren songs of Bono and Geldof will be working hard in favour of the quiet-life option. There is an important rhetorical battle to be won in the days ahead. The choice for Britons now is whether they wish to be Australians post-Bali or Spaniards post-Madrid. That shouldn't be a tough call. But it's easy to stand before a news camera and sonorously declare that "the British people will never surrender to terrorism". What would you call giving IRA frontmen offices at Westminster? It's the target that decides whether terror wins - and in the end, for all the bombings, the British people and their political leaders decided they preferred to regard the IRA as a peripheral nuisance which a few concessions could push to the fringe of their concerns. They thought the same in the 1930s - back when Czechoslovakia was "a faraway country of which we know little". Today, the faraway country of which the British know little is Britain itself. Traditional terrorists - the IRA, ETA - operate close to home. Islamism projects itself long-range to any point of the planet with an ease most G8 militaries can't manage. Small cells operate in the nooks and crannies of a free society while the political class seems all but unaware of their existence. Did we learn enough, for example, from the case of Omar Sheikh? He's the fellow convicted of the kidnapping and beheading in Karachi of the American journalist Daniel Pearl. He's usually described as "Pakistani" but he is, in fact, a citizen of the United Kingdom - born in Whipps Cross Hospital, educated at Nightingale Primary School in Wanstead, the Forest School in Snaresbrook and the London School of Economics. He travels on a British passport. Unlike yours truly, a humble Canadian subject of the Crown, Mr Sheikh gets to go through the express lane at Heathrow. Or take Abdel Karim al-Tuhami al-Majati, a senior al-Qa'eda member from Morocco killed by Saudi security forces in al Ras last April. One of Mr Majati's wives is a Belgian citizen resident in Britain. In Pakistan, the jihadists speak openly of London as the terrorist bridgehead to Europe. Given the British jihadists who've been discovered in the thick of it in Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Palestine, Chechnya and Bosnia, only a fool would believe they had no plans for anything closer to home - or, rather, "home". Most of us can only speculate at the degree of Islamist penetration in the United Kingdom because we simply don't know, and multicultural pieties require that we keep ourselves in the dark. Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of Britain's Islamic Human Rights Commission, is already "advising Muslims not to travel or go out unless necessary, and is particularly concerned that women should not go out alone in this climate". Thanks to "Islamophobia" and other pseudo-crises, the political class will be under pressure to take refuge in pointless gestures (ie, ID cards) that inconvenience the citizenry and serve only as bureaucratic distractions from the real war effort. Since 9/11 most Britons have been sceptical of Washington's view of this conflict. Douglas Hurd and many other Tory grandees have been openly scornful of the Bush doctrine. Lord Hurd would no doubt have preferred a policy of urbane aloofness, such as he promoted vis à vis the Balkans in the early 1990s. He's probably still unaware that Omar Sheikh was a westernised non-observant chess-playing pop-listening beer-drinking English student until he was radicalised by the massacres of Bosnian Muslims. Abdel Karim al-Tuhami al-Majati was another Europeanised Muslim radicalised by Bosnia. The inactivity of Do-Nothin' Doug and his fellow Lions of Lethargy a decade ago had terrible consequences and recruited more jihadists than any of Bush's daisy cutters. The fact that most of us were unaware of the consequences of EU lethargy on Bosnia until that chicken policy came home to roost a decade later should be sobering: it was what Don Rumsfeld, in a remark mocked by many snide media twerps, accurately characterised as an "unknown unknown" - a vital factor so successfully immersed you don't even know you don't know it. This is the beginning of a long existential struggle, for Britain and the West. It's hard not to be moved by the sight of Londoners calmly going about their business as usual in the face of terrorism. But, if the governing class goes about business as usual, that's not a stiff upper lip but a death wish. |
Link |
Britain |
Steyn Understands... |
2005-07-07 |
The Choice "When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, naturally they will like the strong horse." So said Osama bin Laden in his final video appearance two-and-a-half years ago. But even the late Osama might have been surprised to see the Spanish people, invited to choose between a strong horse and a weak horse, opt to make their general election an exercise in mass self-gelding. Aha! now I know why the birthrate is so low! That's how I began my Telegraph column on March 16th last year - five days after the Madrid bomb, two days after the Spanish election. The choice for the British people today is whether to be the Spaniards post-Madrid or the Australians post-Bali. Anyone who knows Britain knows the citizenry don't incline naturally to appeasement, but anyone who knows their political elites knows the same cannot be said quite so clearly for their governing class. Yup! Galloway is contorting like a pretzel! ... After the initial shock of stumbling over the truth, what will Britain do? Go back to the Bob Geldof agenda or avenge her dead? I think the gelding should be performed at some of those radical mosques... |
Link |
International-UN-NGOs |
G8 summit safety fears after security plan leak |
2005-06-20 |
THE government was last night facing demands to reassess the security threat to the G8 summit after plans to protect the world's most powerful people were leaked. Confidential documents detailing the assessment of the terrorist threat - including from chemical or radiological attack - were passed on by a member of the intelligence community in an apparent attempt to embarrass UK ministers. The whistleblower said he was appalled by the "complacency" towards security. The documents were said to include an analysis of the hotel's possible vulnerability and the likely positioning of security forces. The report stated that the blueprint, drawn up for what is known as Operation Sorbus, included a list of vulnerable areas at the venue. It showed reinforced fencing to keep out potential protesters and suicide bombers and aerial photographs of the venue marking likely terrorist targets. But Tayside Police yesterday dismissed as "nonsense" suggestions that the leak had exposed flaws in the preparations for the summit in July. Willie Bald, the Tayside Police Assistant Chief Constable, said any suggestion that preparations for the event had been thrown into disarray following the leak was "nonsense". "We can see no reason why someone genuinely concerned about security plans for the summit would see any benefit in speaking to the press," he said. He added: "No such concerns have been raised with Tayside Police and to say ministers, or indeed anyone involved in the preparations for the summit, are approaching the event with complacency could not be further from the truth." Mr Bald said he was confident of the "comprehensive security operation" in place to protect the world leaders, including Tony Blair and the United States president, George Bush. The whistleblower reportedly leaked the plans to shock ministers, who he believed had taken security arrangements at the summit for granted. He was quoted in the paper saying: "I have been increasingly appalled by the air of complacency surrounding this event, particularly as displayed by ministers. "The release of a portion of non-operational material is intended as a wake-up call before that complacency becomes truly dangerous." The leaked plans also reportedly contained the location of a special forces base, the placing of troops and a wrangle between the US and the UK over the deployment of surface-to-air missiles. David Davis, the shadow home secretary, said the leak was potentially an "immensely serious breach of national security". He added: "The immediate task for the Home Secretary must be to reappraise all aspects of security at the G8 in light of this breach." Last night a Downing Street spokeswoman said the government did not comment on security arrangements, but the leak casts further doubt over the security arrangements made for Gleneagles, the cost of which has been put in some estimates at £100 million. Amid continued speculation on the scale of the threat posed by protestors, there were also reports yesterday that teams of riot police from Northern Ireland will be drafted into Scotland. Despite July being the height of the loyalist marching season, police from the province will be brought in to help in Edinburgh - where Live Aid campaigner Bob Geldof has called for a million people to protest - and around Gleneagles itself. There has also been confusion over the level of security around the hotel. Tayside Police confirmed on Friday that a second inner security cordon will be put in place around the hotel. The authorities refused to go into details of the new cordon, which they claimed had always been part of their plans, but it was likely to be inside the five-mile fence already erected round Gleneagles. During the huge security operation in Edinburgh, police are planning to secure the Scottish Parliament building, as well as the official Royal residence of Holyroodhouse, by building a fence around them. The security operation in Scotland will involve about 5,000 extra police officers drafted in from forces across England and Wales. Last week there was a dispute over whether protestors could march close to the hotel itself. The police officer in charge of security has given the green light for protesters to demonstrate next to the fence. John Vine, Tayside's Chief Constable, said protesters would be free to demonstrate along the perimeter fence provided they did not break the law. But Perth and Kinross Council has refused to grant permission for a march past the hotel, saying public safety would be put at risk. Instead, the council has said it will allow a rally for up to 4,500 people in nearby Auchterarder on the opening day of the summit. Mike Yardley, an independent expert, said release of the leaked information was a criminal act and could potentially be used by protesters and terrorists to cause chaos at the event. But Yardley said the release of such "specific" information was not in the public interest. "Information like this could be used by a range of people, from low-grade risk globalisation protesters to something much more serious." |
Link |
Britain |
What Labour Wants out of the Push for African Aid |
2005-06-12 |
The last half of an article in the Tory magazine the Spectator. Free reg required. The broader political significance of this poverty agenda has not yet been noticed. It has its roots in the terror all mainstream politicians feel at the collapse of mass party politics. The Labour party and the Tory party, which both enjoyed memberships of over one million voters barely a generation ago, today cannot count on more than 500,000 between them. By contrast, the four largest aid agencies Oxfam, Christian Aid, Action Aid and Save the Children have the best part of three million members. Just before the general election the ace Labour strategist Douglas Alexander, now minister for Europe, delineated the problem in a pamphlet, Telling It Like It Could Be. 'Citizens are increasingly participating in activities such as single issue campaigns,' wrote Alexander, 'without seeing these as activities in which party politics should or could play a role. Labour needs to engage these people in our vision of the good society.' Alexander, a key adviser to Chancellor Gordon Brown, argues that Labour must take full advantage of all this energy. His pamphlet, though published before the election, was a manifesto for much that has happened since. It explains exactly why the British government is so mesmerised by the Geldof agenda, and accounts for the perplexing collusion that will take place when the G8 summit takes place in Scotland: the British government conspiring with protesters by urging them to come and disrupt its own event. For New Labour, Make Poverty History will win back the voters lost over Iraq. It is, of course, good that we should think about Africa, and there is no denying that Bob Geldof is a wonderful man. Nevertheless, there are substantial reasons for concern at this new method of making policy. For one thing, it is not democratic. Africa did not loom large during the general election campaign. Pretty well all MPs report that alarm about mass immigration was a much bigger issue. And yet we have heard nothing about immigration since 5 May. The day after the election Tony Blair announced that he had been chastened by the result, and would spend much more time addressing the domestic agenda. Instead, he has set about the prodigious task, which has frustrated all politicians since Alfred Milner a century ago, of how to solve the African problem. This project is about re-energising lost activists, not appealing to the average voter. Giving way to pressure groups like Make Poverty History is as bad a way of making policy as surrendering to corporate lobbyists. Its agenda debt forgiveness and a huge increase in aid is very hard to defend. As Richard Dowden of the Royal Africa Society notes, 'If aid were the solution to Africa's problems it would be a rich continent by now.' Tony Blair is open to the same criticism over Africa as over Iraq: that he is guilty of a naive belief in interventionism. The contrast between the British insistence on aid and the American focus on proper governance is very striking. Nevertheless George Bush did his best for Tony Blair this week in Washington. He is extremely fond of the British Prime Minister, and the real venom is felt towards Gordon Brown. The Chancellor badly upset the White House when he tried to railroad Condoleezza Rice over Africa at a meeting in the British Foreign Office on 4 February. According to well-placed sources, he treated Rice with the same contempt that he normally hands out to Cabinet colleagues. Afterwards the Americans briefed that Brown's financing plan was poorly thought through and would 'be forgotten within a year'. Well-informed sources say that President Bush is proud of what he has done for Africa, and is 'affronted by the way Gordon Brown is trying to get cheap publicity ahead of the G8'. The US President may well have spent a portion of his private meeting with Tony Blair this week urging the British Prime Minister to remain in power as long as possible. Meanwhile the volume of private briefing against the Chancellor from within the White House is remarkable by any standards. None of this will do Gordon Brown any harm at all with the Labour party. Quite the reverse: falling out in such a spectacular fashion with the White House, and the prospect of a sharp cooling in the special relationship with Brown at No. 10, will help ensure him the succession. Even so, the Chancellor's clumsy, bullying diplomacy raises real questions about whether he has the calibre to be prime minister. |
Link |
Fifth Column |
Police prepare to make thousands of arrests at G8 |
2005-06-12 |
![]() Senior detectives have told The Sunday Telegraph that more than 50 dedicated troublemakers with criminal records have slipped into the country, before the imposition of stringent security measures at airports, ferry terminals and on the Eurostar train service in the immediate run-up to the summit. World leaders including Tony Blair and presidents Putin, Bush and Chirac will attend the three-day meeting and police are straining to protect them and keep protesters at bay. There are fears that anarchists from across Europe will mingle with anti-capitalism campaigners in and around Edinburgh, which is expected to be the focal point of demonstrations against the international financial system. Their numbers are likely to be swollen by campaigners for African debt relief, who have been urged to descend on the Scottish capital by Bob Geldof. According to warnings passed by Italian police to their British counterparts, some Italian protesters intend to dangle themselves on ropes from motorway bridges to disrupt traffic. Italian police have also uncovered plans to overturn and set fire to lorries on the main A9 approach road to Gleneagles. Detectives also believe that some anarchists want to blockade the Faslane nuclear base on the Clyde, near Glasgow. Detectives in Scotland and at Special Branch headquarters at Scotland Yard in London, say that protest groups including Ya Basta, which once held a squat on a train and demanded to be taken to a financial summit in Prague, have sent "sleepers" into Britain to organise protests. One Italian anarchist known as "The Raven" entered Britain two weeks ago but police have lost track of him. Some of the information disclosed to senior police officers by Scotland Yard and MI5, the security service, follows the arrest in Rome on May 26 of five suspected anarchists - three men and two women, including their suspected ringleader, Massimo Leonardi - who were planning to target Gleneagles. They revealed that colleagues had already left Italy for Britain. In a related investigation, police raided 80 homes in Bologna and other central and northern cities, targeting two further anarchist groups intending to visit Gleneagles. One senior detective who monitors anarchist groups said: "There are close connections between British groups such as Class War and foreign groups such as Ya Basta. "We know that some Italian anarchists have already entered the country and are staying at squats and safe houses with British sympathisers. They are planning major violent disruptions to the Gleneagles summit and we will be powerless to stop them." The army bases earmarked to hold arrested protesters include the Dreghorn and Redford barracks, and the bases of the 2nd Division Craigiehall and the 51 Scottish Regiment, all within a 20-mile radius of Gleneagles. Police are concerned that Geldof's call for a million people to descend on the city will provide perfect cover for anarchists, and fear a repeat of the violence at the 2001 Genoa summit in Italy. There, hundreds were injured, one man died after being run over by a police vehicle, and the crowds were eventually dispersed by armed police using tear gas. Assistant Chief Constable Ian Dickinson, of the police force which covers Gleneagles and Edinburgh, said: "A million people coming to Edinburgh - it is difficult to conceive how they could all get to this area in the first place and where they could assemble safely. No one wants tragedy to distract world attention from the aims of the campaigners." The grounds of Gleneagles and much of the surrounding area will be fenced off and patrolled during the meetings, but one group, calling itself the People's Golfing Association, plans to invade the hotel grounds and golf course and disrupt the first-day photocall of the G8 leaders. Dissent, a south London-based anti-capitalist group, has called for supporters to blockade roads around the resort on July 6. Some foreign anarchists also intend to storm Edinburgh's leading financial institutions including Standard Life and the Royal Bank of Scotland and stage sit-ins. Police said the plans were discussed at a "conference of anarchists" in Nottingham earlier this month. In response, police will mount their biggest ever operation in Scotland, with more than 5,000 officers on duty instructed to enforce a zero-tolerance policy and arrest anyone breaking the law. Police intend to set up road blocks in a 40-mile radius of Edinburgh and Gleaneagles and say they will use the Public Order Act 1988 - originally intended to control outdoor raves - to detain people and disperse crowds. Intelligence officers said that S26, an international anarchist umbrella group, originally formed to organise protests in Prague against the International Monetary Fund/World Bank conference there on September 26, 2002 - hence its name - was orchestrating some of the protest actions. Class War, a veteran British anarchist outfit, some of whose 200 activists have declared their support for violence, especially against property, is expected to take part in protests. The so-called Wombles (White Overall Movement Building Liberation through Effective Struggle), the largest of the three, is an anti-capitalist group formed in 2002. A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland said: "We will be properly prepared for any eventuality. We have said all along that, while we will facilitate lawful protest, we will deal with anyone who wants to cause disruption." |
Link |