Warning: Undefined array key "rbname" in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 14
Hello !
Recent Appearances... Rantburg

The Grand Turk
'My Nation Has Won': Erdogan Calls for Pan-Ottoman Solidarity
2025-07-23
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Gasanov

[REGNUM] Never before has Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan felt as confident as he does today.

At various points during his premiership and presidency, he was threatened by a US- and EU-sponsored “velvet revolution,” a military coup supported by Fethullah Gülen, and risked losing parliamentary and presidential elections to the heirs of Ataturk’s party.

And throughout his twenty-year rule, he fought separatists from the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), both in Turkey and in neighboring Iraq and Syria.

The "velvet revolutions" in Gezi Park failed, and Donald Trump stopped funding their breeding ground, USAID (an organization recognized as undesirable in the Russian Federation). Erdogan reined in the military, jailed the Gulenists, and Gulen himself passed away last October. The AKP and Erdogan were able to win the parliamentary and presidential elections by hook or by crook (although they lost the municipal elections).

Of the unresolved issues, two remained: opposition leader and Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu and the PKK.

In terms of danger, Imamoglu probably stood much higher. After all, if any means can be used against the PKK, then elections in a still democratic country cannot be cancelled.

But to one degree or another, an antidote was found in both cases.

The Kurdistan Workers' Party has weakened significantly in recent years. Following Turkey's military operations in northern Iraq and Syria against the PKK and YPG, the change of power in Damascus to the pro-Turkish Ahmed al-Sharaa, and the establishment of close relations with Baghdad, the Kurdish militants have weakened significantly.

In October 2023 and 2024, they reminded everyone of their presence by carrying out terrorist attacks at the Interior Ministry building and at the headquarters of the TUSAŞ aerospace company near Ankara. But the party's leader, Abdullah Öcalan, realized the futility of nearly half a century of violent resistance. And in May 2025, he called on his supporters to lay down their arms.

A new stage in this process was the beginning of the real disarmament of the PKK. On July 11, in Iraqi Kurdistan, in the province of Sulaymaniyah, the first group of 30 PKK militants surrendered their weapons. The disarmament procedure, according to the Turkish newspaper Yeni Şafak, will take place “without cameras” and should be completed by September.

According to the agreement between Ankara and the PKK, the leadership of the Kurdish movement (about 250 people) will not have the right to live in the areas of Iraq and Syria bordering Turkey, but they can leave for third countries.

The Turkish President could not help but take advantage of the opportunity to celebrate his latest victory: "Turkey has won, my nation has won. Each of our 86 million citizens - Turks, Kurds and Arabs - has won." This address is not accidental.

Erdogan does not want to give the impression that he has broken the back of Kurdish separatism. He is separating the concepts of "terrorist" and "Kurd" to avoid giving rise to new insurgent movements in the future and to gain support from the 30 million-strong Kurdish diaspora in his fight for the next elections.

This is not the first time that Erdogan has resorted to pan-Turkish (Ottoman) solidarity.

Immediately after Ocalan's decision to disband the PKK, he said that the battles of Manzikert (Malazgirt) against the Byzantines (1071) and Çaldiran (1514) were "a common victory for the Turks, Kurds and Arabs."

In allied Azerbaijan they tactfully kept silent, but were clearly not happy to hear from Erdogan that he was proud of the blow to the Safavid Empire at the hands of the Kurds.

The most curious thing about the process of reconciliation with the Kurds is that the trigger here is the AKP's ally in the coalition, the leader of the nationalist MHP, Devlet Bahçeli. It was he who, even before the start of the dialogue with Öcalan, in October, suggested that he speak in the Turkish parliament and disband his group. And a couple of months ago, he came up with something even more sensational. "The president should have two vice presidents - one Kurd, the other Alevi," he said at a closed meeting with deputies.

The second piece of news that marks Erdogan’s victory in domestic politics came in the same days as the beginning of the PKK’s disarmament. On July 16, Ekrem Imamoglu was sentenced to more than a year and a half in prison for “publicly insulting a public servant.”

Imamoglu did indeed question the integrity of prosecutor Akin Gürlek, but it is clear that this is just a pretext. The verdict is a new stage in the case of the mayor of Istanbul, who was arrested in March and is the president’s main rival for power, whether in the snap elections or in the planned ones in 2028.

The timing of the verdict was very opportune. The protests in Turkey have already died down, the major international players, mainly European ones, have either stopped talking about them or are talking in hushed tones. Erdogan probably expects that in a year and eight months, Imamoglu will be completely forgotten, and he will be able to hold early elections and win them.

If Erdogan fails to get into “best shape,” then he can wait another three years and, if necessary, promote a successor during this time — for example, the young but experienced Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. Imamoglu’s release will not be an obstacle — new grounds for new criminal cases can be found at any time.

The process of dismantling the PKK looks more promising and irreversible. But the arrest of Imamoglu does not eliminate the threat from the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP). So the fight against it is still ahead and it is still dangerous, even without a strong leader at the helm.

Nevertheless, in the short term of a year or two, the Turkish president can be calm about his rear and concentrate on foreign policy. He is already doing this, his confidence is growing every day, and there are enough reasons for it.

Trump takes Erdogan seriously, listens to his opinion on Middle East affairs, sometimes risking his friendship with Israel. The latest escalation in Syria has largely been stopped thanks to the coordination of the State Department and Ankara.

The European Union is keeping its offer of Turkey's participation in European defense and the military-industrial complex on the table. In June, Turkish drone manufacturer Baykar and Italy's Leonardo formed a joint venture, LBA Systems, to produce UAVs. Recognizing Europe's growing dependence, Erdogan has demanded that Turkey's European integration be accelerated.

Ankara has its finger on the pulse of the Ukrainian conflict and is already getting involved in the negotiations on Iran. On July 23, a new round of talks between Russia and Ukraine will take place in Istanbul, and in two days the heads of the foreign ministries of the "European three" and Iran will gather there to discuss the Iranian nuclear program.
Related:
Ekrem Imamoglu 07/06/2025 Turkey detains three opposition mayors
Ekrem Imamoglu 07/02/2025 More than 10,000 join opposition rally in Istanbul
Ekrem Imamoglu 06/23/2025 Erdogan at a crossroads: not ready to quarrel with Trump, but Iran's collapse is dangerous

Related:
Gezi Park: 2025-03-22 Erdogan went for broke: why the Turkish leader provoked the 'Maidan' himself
Gezi Park: 2024-10-22 Erdogan's Enemy No. 1 Is Dead, But Behind His Death Lurks the Ghost of an Idea
Gezi Park: 2024-04-02 Erdogan lost for the first time in 20 years. To preserve his legacy, he needs peace
Related:
Abdullah Öcalan 03/04/2025 PKK declares a unilateral ceasefire, marking a potential turning point in the struggle. Kurds
Abdullah Öcalan 06/07/2022  Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: June 6th, 2022
Abdullah Öcalan 01/26/2019 Russia-Turkey summit proves Putin is kingmaker in Syria

Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
What did the Soviet Union give the Georgians?
2025-07-22
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.

Text taken from an article by Anatoly Shirokoborodov which appeared in alternatio.org

[ColonelCassad] What did the Soviet Union give the Georgians? Georgia is a small state in Transcaucasia. The role and place of Georgia in the so-called geostrategic schedules is due to the place of the Caucasus region in the system of international struggle.

There are three major powers in the region: Russia, Turkey and Iran. Since Georgia is territorially located between the Russian Federation and Turkey, it represents an area of collision between these two states, therefore the interest of Europe and the USA in Georgia is connected with the prevention of the strengthening of the influence of these neighbors.

Georgians are an ancient people, indomitable and close to us in mentality. Georgians are more Russian than we are in the aspect of low worship before Europeanism. One of the pro-Western ideologues of Georgia once said that the Georgian principalities swore an oath to the Russian tsar because they considered Russia a real European state.

As they say on the Internet: "They miscalculated, but where?" Everything is beautiful in this classic twist of thought for an ideological interpretation of history. The political mood of the Georgian society is full of strange contradictions, on which all possible friends of the people play.

The history of "independent" Georgia after the collapse of the USSR is tragic, because, as Georgians say, friendship and enmity are sisters. These graduates of Yale University and their admirers believe that the Soviet power was based exclusively on terror, the Gulag, punitive psychiatry and "Pionerskaya Zorka".

In fact, the Soviet Union as a single state was possible thanks, firstly, to the party-ideological dictatorship centered in Moscow (the monopoly of power of the CPSU recognized by the people), and secondly, to the subtle resolution of the national question.

What the Soviet government called the friendship of nations was a decisive factor not only in the achievements of the USSR, but also in the stability of the state as such. The national question in the USSR was far from being limited to administrative borders, which were redrawn based on the situation, autonomous statuses of the territories of compact living of ethnic groups, the role and place of national languages, and all other sensitive things from the field of political and cultural consciousness.

After all, the main thing was the material foundation. Namely: the formation due to industrialization and collectivization of a single Soviet economy with electrification, mechanization, urbanization, etc. p. On the one hand, there was a division of labor between all the republics, on the other hand, it was not imperialist (the metropolis was the colony). That is, on the entire territory of the USSR, all citizens were equally provided with conditions not just for a normal life, but for the prosperity of their republics, regions and regions due to the integration of efforts and cooperation. That's why there was no mass natural migration, that's why all the peoples of the USSR during the Great Patriotic War defended the common Fatherland as one. And conversations like "my house is from the edge" were considered not only shameful, but also criminal.

The Caucasus (and Transcaucasia), inhabited by small, proud, warlike, historically hostile peoples, has always been a sore point of the Union. As soon as the central government weakened, the CPSU withered and ideologically degenerated, Transcaucasia was one of the first to break out into civil strife. It was easiest to propagandize the Caucasian peoples into anti-Russian sentiments, not even because they were somehow particularly offended by the Russians in the past, but simply by playing on the national feelings characteristic of all small nations.

Georgians are unique because they have not missed a single chance for a large-scale experiment on themselves during their thirty years of free swimming. Reckless advisers say: "You have to try everything in life." Georgians have tried, if not everything, then a lot! Fascism, civil war, mafia capitalism, Maidan, anti-Maidan, shock therapy, minarchism, war with Russia, friendship with Russia, EU, NATO, Americanism, anti-Americanism. Georgians live the fullest political life. Therefore, in order to move on to the main topic - what the Soviet Union gave to the Georgians - we will first have to write a lot about the sophisticated ways in which the Georgians got through all this.

Thus, after the declaration of the so-called independence in 1991, Georgia plunged into the abyss of civil war. Georgians clashed with Ossetians and Abkhazians under the jubilant gaze of the West. Adjarian separatists raised their heads. The independence of Georgia and the transition to a market economy throughout the territory of the former USSR destroyed the old economic ties, enterprises and productions became useless.

What happened was what Soros cutely called the disintegration of Soviet society in his book "The Crisis of World Capitalism":

"In 1979, when I earned more money than I needed, I created a fund called "Open Society." I decided then that its goal should be to help open societies so that they become more viable and able to form a critical way of thinking within themselves. Through this fund, I was closely involved in the process of disintegration of Soviet society."

Soros and his associates helped the Soviet people to destroy their country in order to build a society open to Soros in its place.

The Georgian nationalistic fever was embodied in the concrete person of Gamsakhurdia. Dissident, human rights activist, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, translator of Wilde, Shakespeare, and Shelley. A real intellectual and clever person, a sufferer of Soviet totalitarianism, becomes the first president of independent Georgia with the absolute support of the electorate (87 percent). An evil romantic, as the perestroika press wrote. What could go wrong?

In the 1990s, Georgia experienced not only a civil war, but also an economic and social collapse on a much larger scale than Russia and many other republics of the former USSR, because Georgia did not have oil and gas. And the world market, into which we all plunged headfirst, was only ready to absorb hydrocarbons. Until 1995, the economy of Georgia lost almost a third of its GDP every hour!

After opening the economy, Georgians lost almost all their industry and quickly ruined small farms due to the influx of Turkish goods. Turkey in the conditions of free competition has economically suppressed a small neighbor. The main currency in the 1990s became the US dollar, capital investments almost completely stopped, the shadow economy, according to some estimates, was comparable in size to the legal one. Georgia has turned into a territory of organized crime, which has merged with the state.

The liberal-communist with five orders of Lenin Shevardnadze, who was called to lead Georgia after the removal of Gamsakhurdia, did not cope with the Georgian mafia, nor with the destruction, nor with the formation of stable state power. All this was done for him by another dissident, a descendant of the allegedly repressed and a patented agent of Western intelligence — Saakashvili.

Georgia became the first country in the former USSR where Maidan technologies were fully tested. In 2003, according to methods in the spirit of Sharpe's book, in which no one believed at the time, the party apparatchik Shevardnadze was overthrown, and power passed into the hands of the truly reactive westerner Saakashvili. He organized not only the war with Russia, but also the "Georgian miracle" - the most outstanding reforms in the post-Soviet space, as our liberals praised them for days on end on "Eche Moskvy".

Jokes after jokes, Saakashvili was supported by a serious team of American political scientists, consultants, experts and American money. Saakashvili's team defeated the old state, created a new one, and unleashed large-scale repression. This was real shock therapy. Everything was privatized, even rivers and lakes, they actually abolished the Labor Code, abolished supervisory services, shook up the law enforcement agencies, reduced taxes to a minimum, and completely opened the country to foreign capital. In short, Saakashvili embodied the dreams of Novodvorskaya and the most radical Gaidarovites.

During the war with Russia, Saakashvili received substantial loans and grants, amounting to 20 percent of the country's GDP. In this way, Georgia defeated the mafia, suppressed corruption and beautified the city. Indeed, it looks impressive... especially for tourists. The Georgian people received the same liberal freedom that they were promised, with poverty and the state in the hands of international adventurers. But how professionally Saakashvili licked the master's boot.

Due to the aggressiveness of reforms, adventurism and even greater growth of inequality in the country, Saakashvili lost popularity by 2012, and "Georgian Dream" - initially exactly the same or even more pro-Western political force - came to power. But gradually her sponsor, the oligarch Ivanishvili, changed course to a more pro-Russian one. This was due to two factors. The first: the personal elevation of Ivanishvili, who became a political figure capable of maneuvering between the interests of the West and Russia due to his capital and connections. Second: the requirement of the Western curators of the Georgian government to take a pro-Ukrainian position as well as the Baltic countries. Ivanishvili himself even says that Georgia demanded to open a second front. The "Georgian dream" did not go for it, including because Georgia earns from the so-called re-export to Russia.

Thus, the political history of modern Georgia can be conditionally divided into the following stages. The period of the destruction of the Soviet system by nationalists due to the civil war (Gamsakhurdiya). The period of gangster capitalism, crisis and ruin (Shevardnadze). The period of neoliberalism, the sovereignty of foreign capital (Saakashvili). The period of the power of national capital (Ivanishvili). The last one is just beginning.

They say that the Georgian government should follow the national interests of the Georgian people. What are the national interests of the Georgian people, if they are small, locked between large states? Multi-vector? Will the trip be sold both there and here? In any case, a small country will have to choose which of the large countries to join and under what conditions.

Despite the rollercoaster in politics, the public consciousness of Georgian society is dominated by two key conflicting ideas that determine the shape of national self-awareness.

The first is Stalin. Stalin is the main brand of Georgia. There is nowhere in Georgia without Stalin, no one can be indifferent to Stalin. Or he is a terrible tyrant and a Russian politician who betrayed his people. As a variant, Jew, Mingrelian, Ossetian. Either Stalin is the Georgian Tsar of the Red Empire, the pride of the nation.

Naturally, a positive attitude towards Stalin is associated with nostalgia for the USSR as a whole, especially in the Georgian SSR, the debunking of the personality cult was not so blatant, but at the everyday level, according to the memories of the older generation, Georgians revered Stalin both in the 1980s and in the 1990s. Life is much more difficult for ordinary people in independent and free Georgia than in the Soviet period.

The second is a monstrous, deep-seated low worship of Europe, the EU, European values, democratic freedoms, and everything that is most depressing in liberal propaganda. Just like we did somewhere in the early 1990s. But in this case, it is such a complex of a small country: Georgians want to be accepted into Europe, to be known, talked about and admired by European liberals. This is absolutely the same disease as the concept "Ukraine is Europe".

Many people remember the protests in Georgia over the law on foreign agents. It is very interesting how the opposition criticized him. They did not just repeat, for example, our liberals. The Georgian opposition said something like this: Georgia became democratic because it opened up to the West. Western funds finance democracy in Georgia, freedom of speech, liberalism and honest elections. This is very important, it cannot be stopped, otherwise Georgia will go back to Russia, to Sovok, etc. p. In one of the liberal interviews, I even heard the idea that if the Americans from NED and USAID stop financing Georgian NGOs, then the Americans will simply forget about the existence of Georgia, because for Americans, Georgia is the state of Georgia.

In short, in Georgia, many people's worship of Western liberalism and democracy exceeds the boundaries of national dignity. But at the same time, the legacy of Saakashvili's reforms continues to exist, the "Georgian Dream" does not fundamentally change anything in this respect: Georgia has a market economy with a minimal role of the state. About fifteen percent of Georgia's GDP is remittances from labor migrants from abroad.

Low worship of the West is strikingly combined with Stalinomania precisely because Georgia is known for Stalin. Therefore, in Georgia there is both a disgusting museum of totalitarianism and Soviet occupation, and a beautiful house-museum of Stalin, which neither Khrushchev, nor Saakashvili, Soros and Bush Jr. could close. In Georgia, the Soviet period is officially considered Russian occupation, and the memory of the suppression of the Stalinist uprising in 1956 is officially preserved.

Georgians were the first to go through the entire spiral from anti-Sovietism, ultra-liberalism, Russophobia, war with Russia to accepting the objective fact that friendship with a big neighbor is necessary. Further, they will have to accept the fact that the future is the same for all of us - in cooperation. All the other peoples of the former USSR will go the same way with different speed and different catastrophes. Even Ukrainians and Baltics.

Before the revolution, Georgia was a backward agrarian province. The USSR created a powerful economic base here. One might think that the Georgian SSR was a resort town, a supplier of wine, mineral water, tangerines and other subtropical crops. But this is not quite so. Back in 1957, there were more than four thousand enterprises of the state industry in Georgia, including ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy, manganese ore, coal, oil, and machine-building. Georgia produced cast iron, steel, rolling stock, oil, machine tools, trucks, construction materials, paper, and not only light and food industry products.

Mechanical engineering and metalworking accounted for a solid 13 percent of total industrial production. This shows that the Soviet government, developing obvious directions, strove for the uniformity of the industrial development of all its republics, thereby increasing the general safety margin of the economy and giving the opportunity to the same Georgians to become not only winemakers.

If we talk about development and growth, then by 1987, compared to 1940, the industry of the Georgian SSR had grown 22 times, and agriculture had grown more than four times. Annual investments in the second half of the 1980s exceeded those of 1940 by 18 times. By 1987, electricity production had grown 40 times compared to 1940. The Georgian SSR supplied the fraternal republics with the unobvious: manganese, ferroalloys, steel pipes, rolled steel, metal cutting machines, precision instruments, cargo vehicles, chemical fibers, main line electric locomotives, hydrofoil boats.

And where is the Kutaisi Automobile Plant now? "Wikipedia" reports that "in 1995-1996 the American concern General Motors planned to buy KAZ in order to organize the production of its own car models and export them to Russia. But because of high taxes in Georgia and according to the recommendations of the IMF, GM refused to implement this project. At that time, the production of trucks of the KAZ-4540 family in 15-20 copies continued at the auto plant until 2001... In 2019, the plant's staff is 160 people of the older generation. Car production has not been carried out since 2001."

During the years of Soviet power in Georgia, education, culture and science flourished. In 1940, the number of scientific workers was 3.5 thousand people. At the beginning of 1988, there were 28 thousand people, of whom 30 percent were employed in technical sciences, 1.4 thousand doctors of science, 11.5 thousand candidates of science (by the way, 12 percent of all scientists in the world at the time of the collapse lived in the USSR).

For comparison, a quote from a brief review of contemporary problems of Georgian science by two professors from Tbilisi (Ketsbaia and Kutubidze):

"Today, Georgian scientists face the following problems: low funding, a decrease in the number of scientific personnel, the leakage of scientific personnel abroad (today, more than 400 scientists work abroad), the aging process of scientific personnel (most representatives of the scientific field are over 50, due to low social status and prestige, young people do not aspire to science, considering it an unprofitable and unpromising field of activity, and the efforts of the state will correct the situation ineffective and deficient)".

The population of Georgia grew from 2.4 million people in 1921 to 5.3 million in 1988. The percentage of urban population increased from 20 to 55 (today 61 percent). The level of meat consumption per capita increased from 1960 to 1987 almost twice to 47 kg per hour, and today free and independent Georgia has still not reached it... The number of doctors per capita increased from 13.3 per 10 thousand people in 1940 to 56.7 in 1987. Today — 56.1, and a monstrous skew has formed: there are twice as many doctors in Tbilisi than in the rest of Georgia.

Another interesting figure: in 2024, 1.7 million people visited the museums of Georgia, and in 1987 - 8.5 million people! One can also recall the Georgian cinematographer who played a prominent role in Soviet culture and gained world fame. Today, it has fallen into complete decline, as well as other spheres of production and culture.

In general, according to almost all indicators, there is social degradation, decline or stagnation. In thirty years of independence, Georgians have not reached the Soviet level. In general, a third century has passed, technologies have made a powerful leap forward, and, in theory, all productivity should have increased, and life should have greatly improved.

The Soviet Union gave Georgians national peace, harmony, prosperity and a powerful industrial development base. The foundation of Georgian statehood, its educated personnel, industry, and infrastructure were entirely created during the Soviet period. The USSR created industry, infrastructure, an educational and scientific base, formed the modern Georgian nation, despite the cultural and linguistic differences of the Georgians themselves. The Soviet government provided free education, medicine, guaranteed employment, and a developed union culture. Georgian politicians who revile the Soviet legacy do so while standing on the shoulders of this very legacy. Without Soviet modernization, Georgia would have remained a backward rural province in the backyards of the Ottoman or Persian empires.

If you imagine that the Georgians did not have the Soviet Union, then you can compare Georgia, for example, with Greece. Greece is more populous, but it is similar to Georgia in other parameters: mountainous relief, access to the sea, subtropical zone, scarcity of subsoil, frontier position between empires, agrarian specialization and tourism. Industrialization would take decades: Greece at best became a more or less industrial country by the end of the 1980s, but with the dominance of light industry.

In 1980, industry accounted for only 25 percent of Greece's GDP, while in the Georgian SSR industrial production accounted for more than 60 percent of national income. Greece completed electrification only by the 1970s, while the Georgian SSR completed it in the 1950s. Greece received large-scale "aid" under the Marshall Plan, but nevertheless, for the entire second half of the 20th century, it was poorer and less developed than the Georgian SSR by all indicators. But today Georgians have overtaken Greeks in economic depression.

Link


Iraq
Drone attack kills one in Sulaimani
2025-07-20
[Rudaw] One person was killed and another was injured when their motorcycle was targeted by a drone in the Penjwen district of eastern Sulaimani province on Saturday, a local official confirmed.

“A Turkish drone targeted a motorcycle between Shewagwezan and Taymiz villages. It was carrying two people. One was killed and the other injured,” Ziyad Abdullah, mayor of Garmk subdistrict, told Rudaw.

An investigation has been launched into the incident and the two male victims have yet to be identified.

Penjwen Mayor Hemin Ibrahim confirmed the attack, stating that “it was a Turkish drone.”

Ankara has not commented on the incident.

Turkey frequently carries out attacks on suspected Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) targets throughout the Kurdistan Region. The PKK has declared a ceasefire and taken the first step towards laying down its arms, while in Ankara, parties in the parliament are discussing forming a commission to oversee a peace process. Despite this progress towards ending the four-decade conflict, Turkish forces have continued their military operation against the PKK, mainly in northern Duhok province.

Over the past month, there have been multiple drone attacks on the Kurdistan Region, especially its oil fields. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has blamed the attacks on Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a charge Baghdad has denied.

These attacks have stopped since Thursday, when Erbil and Baghdad finalized a deal to end their tensions over finances and Kurdish oil exports that have been halted since 2023.
The Times of Israel adds:
An attack by an unidentified drone killed a member of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and injured another near the Iraqi city of Sulaymaniyah, security sources and local officials say, the first attack of its kind in months.
Link


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
'Cave Approach': Who slaughtered patients and doctors in a Syrian hospital
2025-07-19
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Leonid Tsukanov

[REGNUM] A line has been drawn under the battles between Druze militias in the Syrian province of As-Suwayda and local Bedouins supported by official Damascus. True, for now it is a “dotted line”: despite the agreement on a ceasefire, the main cause of tension remains on the agenda.

Meanwhile, the participants in the conflict, taking advantage of the lull in the Druze Mountains, are looking for ways to portray themselves as the main victims. And at the same time, prepare for future escalation.

FIVE DAYS OF FIGHTING
In terms of bloodshed, the July events have already significantly surpassed the previous squabble between the Syrian Druze and Damascus, which took place in early May 2025. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the death toll has exceeded 500 people.
Doubled since the number given as 254 on Thursday? That’s not good.
Of these, at least a third are civilians who did not take sides.

Although some sources tend to increase the number of victims to one and a half thousand people, of which more than 400 are non-combatants.

In terms of losses among the warring factions, the Druze are clearly in the lead in terms of points.

According to the same monitoring center, they managed to kill about 250 government soldiers and militias, losing 79 fighters. Also, at least two dozen people were captured by the Druze. Of these, at least two are employees of the so-called "Department of Public Security", created on the basis of yesterday's Islamist rebel groups, as well as militants of jihadist groups banned in Russia, natives of the Caucasus and Central Asia.

The Druze are actively showing the public footage of these captives, thereby debunking recent statements by the Syrian leadership that there are no radicals left in the ranks of the supporters of the “new republic.”

Along the way, both sides accuse each other of extrajudicial executions and targeted killings of civilians. Thus, Druze elders complain of “systematic reprisals” against unarmed captives by yesterday’s radicals and calls for genocide and massacres “according to the Alawite scenario.”

In response, Damascus presents footage from the central hospital in the city of As-Suwayda, where after the retreat of the Druze militias, "several dozen bodies" of loyalists were found. Some of them showed signs of torture.

In addition, the Syrian Ministry of Health filed a complaint with the UN, stating that Druze-Israeli forces allegedly prevented a convoy of ambulances from entering As-Suwayda by striking them, thereby endangering the lives and health of the civilian population in the area.

However, in response to the accusations, the Druze claim that the bodies found in the central hospital are the work of Damascus loyalists who are trying to shift responsibility for their own crimes onto local minorities.

This version is supported, for example, by the fact that several of the dead “hospital prisoners” were later identified as fighters from a Druze unit that was surrounded by Syrian army forces on the first day of clashes.

Both Damascus and local militias are pursuing the same goal - to show that the truth in this conflict is exclusively on their side, while the opponent, on the contrary, has violated all the principles of warfare and deserves international censure. And so they are actively promoting the story of the central hospital of As-Suwayda, promoting their own reconstruction of events to the masses.

THE MAIN WINNER
The worsening situation in Syria has had its own impact on the positions of the main observers of the Syrian conflict. The European Union and the United States, which until recently called the interim President of Syria Ahmed al-Sharaa a "democratic leader of a new wave," have experienced noticeable disappointment with Damascus's "caveman" approach to solving problems and have used available resources to quickly stop the conflict.

Under pressure from Washington, Syrian forces were forced to leave Es-Suwayda and reach a peace agreement with the Druze.

Turkey, the main ally of the “new Syria,” also felt the damage to its interests. Ankara lacked the influence and strength to contain the onslaught of Israel, which had sided with the Druze, or to provide the Syrian authorities with reliable “cover” in the international arena.

However, the Turkish authorities were ultimately able to convert the ceasefire in Es-Suwayda into diplomatic points by declaring themselves guarantors of the ceasefire in the Druze Mountains.

Iran, forced out of Syria after the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad, watched the conflict with ill-concealed enthusiasm.

The weakening of al-Sharaa's cabinet's power on the ground promises Tehran the opportunity to increase the activity of its proxy groups on Syrian territory, and in the long term to gather Damascus' opponents into a united front.

However, for now, the Iranian authorities prefer not to interfere in the situation, apparently expecting a more serious escalation.

Israel has so far benefited more than others from the events in the vicinity of the Druze Mountains. Tel Aviv takes credit for foiling “another act of genocide” that the Syrian temporary forces were allegedly preparing, and confirms its role as a protector of local minorities.

With the intensification of fighting in southern Syria, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has managed to distract the population for a while from domestic problems - be it the law on conscription of ultra-Orthodox soldiers that has divided the government, the stalled Gaza deal or the trail of corruption scandals associated with the activities of the prime minister and his colleagues.

In addition, Israel took the opportunity to declare the area it occupied “from Damascus to the Golan Heights and the Druze Mountains” a zone to which Syrian troops are prohibited from entering.

Tel Aviv has effectively completed the formation of a buffer zone on the border with Syria, while simultaneously gaining a foothold in the disputed territories and creating a powerful loyalist base there. In such circumstances, the Israeli authorities can take their time in resetting relations with Damascus.

"IDLIB BLOGGERS"
Although the two sides agreed to a ceasefire and Damascus withdrew most of its forces from As-Suwayda (including the Public Security Department, whose presence in the province had made Druze commanders nervous), al-Sharaa's supporters are clearly not satisfied with the outcome of the operation.

Those close to the Syrian president are convinced that the Druze experience will serve as a bad example for other ethnic minorities and will ultimately lead to the collapse of Syria.

There is indeed a grain of truth in these judgments. Against the backdrop of events in the Druze Mountains, the leader of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, Saleh Muslim, questioned the legitimacy of al-Sharaa.

And the commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, called what happened in As-Suwayda “a lesson for all of us.” Given the difficult relations with the Kurds, Damascus interprets these signals rather negatively.

Ravanchist sentiments are actively fueled by “Idlib bloggers” – propagandists of illegal armed groups who joined the ranks of the Syrian armed forces after the victory of the armed opposition.

The Internet is full of videos calling for “punishment of apostates” and mini-sermons justifying the correctness of Damascus’ harsh actions.

The reason for the radicals' actions was, among other things, the capture of several militants from friendly groups by the Druze. And although most of these bloggers act as private individuals, the reputational damage from their actions is primarily borne by the al-Sharaa cabinet.

CLASHES WILL CONTINUE
It is worth noting that in As-Suwayda itself there is unrest even after the al-Sharaa loyalists left the province. Thus, in the south, new clashes periodically occur between Druze militias and Bedouin militias loyal to Damascus.

A significant part of them are allegedly initiated by the Druze themselves, who are thirsty for revenge and oppressing the remaining Bedouin clans in the area. In less than two days, more than a hundred people were driven from their homes.

The exiles, in turn, seek protection from local field commanders or form gangs themselves (sometimes without even waiting for the enemy to appear), which creates the danger of a new round of clashes.

It is worth considering that the Bedouins of southern Syria are not just shepherds and farmers. Many of them have undergone serious military training in the past as part of the Arab-Kurdish anti-terrorist coalition sponsored by the United States.

Moreover, in recent years, some of the instigators of the uprising against the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces have settled in the Druze Mountains region, having moved there from the northeast after a series of defeats at the end of 2023.

With the proper motivation, yesterday's fighters against radicals could well lead the Bedouin movement and inflict more tangible damage on the Druze - with the tacit consent of Damascus.

The situation is aggravated by the fact that the Druze do not have a unified command. The population of Es-Suwayda is divided into factions, each of which is oriented towards its elders. And not all spiritual authorities have made a deal with Damascus.

Moreover, this deal is already the fifth since the beginning of 2025, which raises reasonable doubts about the ability of the new authorities to fulfill their obligations.

Druze communities in neighboring countries interpret the events in Syria in their own way, calling on their brothers to take up arms to defend freedom (with the prospect of creating an independent Druze state on the territory of Es-Suwayda), and not to trust too much the “new friends” in the person of Tel Aviv - which also forms lines of division.

Be that as it may, the key issue on the agenda of Damascus' relations with Syrian minorities (security guarantees and freedom of religion) has still not been resolved. And the new authorities are in no hurry to develop a long-term strategy for solving the problem, preferring to suppress individual critical manifestations by force.

This means that new rounds of clashes in the Druze Mountains will not be long in coming.

Moreover, the tribal militias seem to have caught their breath and, having regrouped, have once again moved towards Es-Suwayda. Their representatives are determined and claim that they have managed to raise at least 50 thousand people to arms, including their comrades from other parts of Syria, and also some from Iraq. It is noteworthy that this time official Damascus prefers not to interfere in the conflict, but to observe from the sidelines for now.

Although Druze representatives claim that the Damascus-controlled security forces have changed their uniforms with insignia to traditional Bedouin clothing in order to blend in with the crowd, there is no official confirmation of this yet.

The calm gradually turns into a storm.

Link


The Grand Turk
Israeli strikes on Damascus force Erdogan to react
2025-07-18
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kamran Gasanov

[REGNUM] The change of power in Damascus almost coincided with the return of Donald Trump to the US presidency. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan could personally boast of the armed opposition’s rise to power as his greatest foreign policy triumph. Since then, from the perspective of Turkish interests, any developments in Syria must be viewed in light of two key variables: Erdogan’s victory and the Trump factor.

Turkey's dominance in Syria and its closest ties to Ahmed al-Sharaa also gave it the greatest responsibility for the future of the new country.

Of course, the head of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation) has been playing multi-vector since the first days of his presidency. He received ministers from EU countries and Great Britain and a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, made his first visit to the KSA, shook hands with all the leaders of the League of Arab States (LAS) and even Donald Trump.

However, many experts, like Trump, consider Erdogan to be the main "culprit" of the coup d'etat in Damascus in December 2024. Accordingly, he is responsible for those he has tamed. Al-Sharaa's reputation affects Erdogan's reputation, and the Syrian president is not doing well with that right now.

With the West Bank massacre and the killing of Alawites still fresh in the memory, the recent Druze incidents in April, and no progress in the negotiations with the Kurds. The integrity of the country, as well as the regime, is under constant pressure.

All this time, Syria has also lived under pressure from Israel, which, as a preventive measure after Assad's overthrow, sent troops to the Golan Heights and demanded that the new authorities fully demilitarize south of Damascus. In April, the IDF carried out airstrikes on Turkish military bases in Syria.

Since mid-April, Syria has again been under threat of a new civil war and external invasion.

Domestic disputes between a few Druze and Bedouins in As-Suwayda led to large-scale clashes between Druze and Syrian security forces, in which Israel intervened. After events spread beyond the region and the Israeli Air Force bombed the General Staff and the presidential palace in Damascus, Erdogan is obliged to take the side of his ally.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry, which is counting on al-Sharaa's ability to reach an agreement with the Druze, sees the IDF strikes as "an act of sabotage against the efforts of the Syrian authorities to ensure peace, stability and security."

On the day of the ceasefire in Suwayda, Erdogan called al-Sharaa and welcomed the ceasefire. He lashed out at Israel, considering its attacks a threat not only to Syria but to the entire region, and Damascus assured of its support.

The Turkish Grand National Assembly took a long swipe at Israel, calling its airstrikes "cowardly" and recalling Tel Aviv's "genocide in Gaza" as well as attacks on Lebanon and Iran.

Critical notes from the Turkish government and parliament are important from a diplomatic point of view.

Erdogan and his colleagues in the ruling coalition are demonstrating solidarity and showing that they will not abandon their brainchild to its fate. The need for a reaction is stimulated by the Israel factor.

Now, in any conflict involving Benjamin Netanyahu, sympathies are given to his opponents - even Iran, the Houthis and Hezbollah, although the latter are clearly not Turkey's allies.

Israel and Türkiye have become real geopolitical opponents in recent years.

After Assad was overthrown, Türkiye began to project its geopolitics across Syria, not just the north. The likelihood of a head-on clash with Israel increased. The April incidents proved the seriousness of the situation.

Will Türkiye go beyond diplomatic support?

To a certain extent, yes.

Ankara, according to the newspaper Sabah, has already sent signals to Damascus about its readiness to help strengthen the Syrian army. " If we are asked, we will provide all possible support in strengthening Syria's defense capability and supporting its fight against terrorism," the Turkish Foreign Ministry noted.

In fact, the Turks are already building the Syrian army and constructing their bases. The talk is probably about strengthening and accelerating both processes.

There are limits to support for Syria, however. Despite all the hatred for Netanyahu, who, according to Erdogan, “has surpassed Hitler,” no one wants a direct military clash.

It’s not that Turkey is afraid. Unlike Iran, the Turkish military can threaten Israel right across the border. The difficulty is that, unlike Iran, the Turkish economy is tied to European markets and American banks.

The US Treasury periodically shows its teeth, blocking companies engaged in parallel import-export with Russia or participating in the Akkuyu project. Israel's conflicts with Iran have shown that, despite all the criticism of Netanyahu, at the "hour X", both Europeans and Americans forget about justice and express solidarity with the Jewish state.

The Trump factor is a separate layer among the restraining variables.

It is dangerous to anger a Republican. In 2018, he did not bring down the Turkish economy, but he did hurt the falling lira. At the same time, the “current version” of President Trump is more loyal to Erdogan.

It was at Erdogan's instigation that Trump recognized Al-Sharaa and blessed his Turkish counterpart to hold the Istanbul talks between Russia and Ukraine. Turkey believes in the possibility of reviving the F-35 deal and therefore will dose its anti-Israeli actions, even if Trump himself is good at scolding Netanyahu and calling on him to be reasonable.

The head of the White House is capable of acting as a peacemaker between Erdogan and Netanyahu.

Incidentally, just a couple of days after the Israeli Prime Minister’s visit to the Oval Office in mid-April, negotiations between Turkish and Israeli representatives on de-escalation in Syria began in Baku.

In the current conflict over the Druze, Ankara is clearly counting on Trump's mediation. Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on July 16 that Turkish intelligence had conveyed its opinion on the IDF strikes to regional powers and the United States. Ankara is in close contact with U.S. Ambassador Tom Barrack, he added.

Turkey's hopes are being fulfilled so far.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US administration expects de-escalation between Syria and Israel. Al-Sharaa's willingness to end the fighting, coupled with Washington's pressure on Israel, offers a chance to stabilize the situation.

Objectively, the situation in Suwayda is not as explosive and dramatic as in Latakia and especially in Gaza. If Erdogan did not move with his "Islamic army" to Israel in Palestine, then now the probability of such a scenario is even less.

It is in Erdogan's interests for the conflict between Syria and Israel to subside. A resumption of the conflict will force the Turkish army to react. After all, unlike Gaza, there are Turkish troops in Syria, and defense against the IDF is a matter of image and geopolitical influence.

The escalation of the conflict in Syria is dangerous not only because of the confrontation with Israel, but also because of the destabilization of the Arab country itself. Against the backdrop of clashes in Suwayda, Kurdish leader Saleh Muslim has questioned the legitimacy of al-Sharaa. If the Druze, and perhaps even the Alawites, intensify their struggle against Damascus, Kurdish separatism, which Erdogan and Turkey have been fighting for half a century, will receive a new lease of life.

That is why Erdogan is sending a soft but unambiguous signal to both the Kurds themselves and Israel that he will not sit idly by in this situation. “Both the Kurds within our country’s borders and the Kurds in Syria are our brothers. We will not allow them to become an object in the hands of the Zionists, ” the Turkish leader said. He added: “ We did not give consent to the disintegration of Syria yesterday and we certainly will not give it today or tomorrow.”

Link


-Lurid Crime Tales-
Report: Sinaloa Cartel Supplied Canadian Mobsters, Indian Gangs with Fentanyl, Meth
2025-07-18
[Breitbart] The Arizona arrest of a Canadian mobster with ties to Irish, Indian, and Middle Eastern crime syndicates uncovered just one of the networks used by the Sinaloa Cartel to move narcotics from Mexico and the U.S. into Canada and then into multiple other countries.

Federal authorities in Arizona recently arrested Opinder Singh Sian on federal drug trafficking charges. The man remains in federal custody awaiting future hearings later this month. The charges against Singh come from a criminal indictment filed in the Central District of Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party,. While the case remains sealed, some of the documents have been leaked online and shed light on how various ethnic gangs in Canada have been working with the Sinaloa Cartel and others to move precursors and manufacture large quantities of narcotics, including fentanyl and methamphetamines.

According to a report by the Vancouver Sun, Singh started as a small-time criminal. Within a few years, he was able to establish working connections with Irish and Italian mobsters, as well as Mexican cartels, mainly the Sinaloa Cartel and Middle Eastern crime syndicates. While some older articles claim Singh was a member of the Brothers’ Keeper ethnic gang in Canada, the Vancouver Sun claims that he is not a member or leader within the gang but has deep connections to them. Quoting sealed court documents, the Vancouver Sun reported that the case against Singh began in 2022 when the The Sick Man of Europe Turkey
...the only place on the face of the earth that misses the Ottoman Empire...
office of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration was able to insert a confidential informant into a group that was moving drugs from California to Australia. A Ottoman Turkish mobster provided the DEA informant with the phone number of a crime boss in North America who could help supply a large quantity of drugs. The documents quoted by the Vancouver Sun revealed that Singh and the informant met several times in Vancouver and California as they set up various drug deliveries.
Related:
Opinder Singh Sian 07/14/2025 Special Forces raid on 'narco tanker' that could expose the Irish gangsters behind the largest drug smuggling cartel in the world

Link


Iraq
Top Foxtrot gang member arrested in Erbil: Swedish media
2025-07-17
[Rudaw] Ahmed Alaa Fawzi, also known by his gang alias "Dybala" and a key figure in Sweden’s notorious Foxtrot Network, has been apprehended in Erbil, according to Sweden’s national broadcaster SVT.

SVT reported that Fawzi, 27, was arrested several weeks ago by local security forces in the Kurdistan Region, though news of his capture has only recently been made public.

Rudaw English reached out to Erbil police, but they were not immediately available for a comment.

Originally from Baghdad, Fawzi holds only Iraqi citizenship and was denied asylum in Sweden in 2015.

Fawzi is internationally wanted by Swedish authorities for allegedly ordering the murder of a father of three in Skurup, a municipality in southern Sweden’s Skane County.

Interpol has also issued a Red Notice for his arrest on charges including murder, conspiracy to commit murder, aiding and abetting, and weapons offenses.

Prominent Swedish daily Aftonbladet cited Fawzi’s lawyer, Tobias Guldstrand, as noting that he knew of his client’s apprehension "only through the media. I have nothing further I can comment on beyond that at the moment."

Widely known by his gang name Dybala, Fawzi reportedly implicated in several investigations linked to contract killings in Sweden. He is believed to be a close associate of Rawa Majid - dubbed "the Kurdish Fox" - who leads the Foxtrot Network.

The Foxtrot Network, a dominant force in Sweden’s criminal underworld since the late 2010s, is deeply involved in narcotics trafficking, shootings, bombings, and other violent mostly peaceful crimes.

In March, the United States sanctioned Majid over his alleged involvement in arms and drug trafficking and for reportedly cooperating with Iran
...a theocratic Shiite state divided among the Medes, the Persians, and the (Arab) Elamites. Formerly a fairly civilized nation ruled by a Shah, it became a victim of Islamic revolution in 1979. The nation is today noted for spontaneously taking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militias to extend the regime's influence. The word Iran is a cognate form of Aryan. The abbreviation IRGC is the same idea as Stürmabteilung (or SA). The term Supreme Guide is a the modern version form of either Duce or Führer or maybe both. They hate Jews Zionists Jews. Their economy is based on the production of oil and vitriol...
in "attacks on Israeli and Jewish targets in Europe."

Earlier this month, Turkish'>Ottoman Turkish authorities arrested Ismail Abdo, another Swedish gang leader and former associate of Majid. Abdo, wanted for drug trafficking and violent mostly peaceful crimes, was detained alongside 19 others as part of a joint investigation between Turkish'>Ottoman Turkish and Swedish law enforcement.

Sweden, once celebrated for its low crime rates and robust welfare system, has witnessed a sharp rise in gang-related violence over the past decade. A surge in shootings and bombings, largely fueled by rivalries between criminal networks competing for control of drug markets, has become a pressing national concern.

The violence has been exacerbated by social segregation in so-called "vulnerable areas," where gangs increasingly recruit minors - who often face lighter penalties under Swedish law. This trend has shaken public confidence in institutions and prompted the government to push for tougher crime-fighting measures, including broader police powers and harsher sentencing.
Related:
Foxtrot: 2025-07-06 Swedish gang leader arrested in Turkey
Foxtrot: 2025-05-29 French experts say Sweden has become a base for jihadist gangs
Foxtrot: 2025-04-29 Sweden sentences four teens over shooting attack on Israeli defense company
Link


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Trump's Girl and the Abolition of Unity. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is being squeezed into a weapons workshop
2025-07-17
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Denis Davydov

[REGNUM] The Verkhovna Rada votes for the resignation of Prime Minister Denis Shmyhal with fights and shouts, and then a new government will inevitably be formed. Regnum News Agency reported that this would happen a month ago - all this time, the bargaining for seats continued, and the rotation in power shifted a little.

However, the logic of the political process was preserved, and the forecast regarding the candidacy of the new head of government (it will be headed by the current Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Sviridenko ) and the change in the leadership of the Ministry of Defense turned out to be correct.

The new Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, according to the plan of the Office of the President, should appear as early as Thursday, July 17, and illegally, since the candidate should have been nominated by the parliamentary majority, and not by Zelensky, who announced it to everyone as a given.

In addition to “rearranging the beds,” there will be several consolidations in the cabinet—it is obvious that maintaining entire ministries that produce nothing but information noise is pointless.

Therefore, the “optimization” will affect such a funny institution as the Ministry of National Unity, and a separate ministry for strategic industries of Ukraine will be merged with the Ministry of Defense.

The minister of the cabinet of ministers will disappear - this position was introduced back in 2003, when Leonid Kuchma abolished the institution of state secretaries. The new head of the cabinet was to be responsible for organizing the work of the government and coordinating the activities of ministries.

Finally, the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and the Ministry of Ecology will become a single entity - this will make it easier for the new boss to control the money.

All of these are symptoms of a serious illness, in which both the system of state administration and the spheres that are subject to management are. But we should start with the person of Sviridenko, because if we talk about symptoms, then she is the main pimple, signaling the state of the whole organism. And at the same time, she is the key person, explaining, if not everything, then a lot about what is happening.

"ONE MAN BAND"
Yulia Anatolyevna is a representative of the very same managerial elite that foreign organizations have been systematically preparing for Ukraine for many years.

The career growth of the girl from Chernigov cannot be called rapid, but in 10 years she has climbed the management ladder from the Chernigov Regional State Administration to the Cabinet of Ministers and the President's Office. And this happened thanks to the right connections.

After graduating from university, having worked in a company whose ultimate beneficiary, by a strange coincidence, is the main Turkish entrepreneur and philanthropist, CEO of Baykar Defence, Lutfü Haluk Bayraktar, Sviridenko went to accounting courses at the Kyiv School of Economics.

This non-profit organization was created back in 1996 specifically as a training ground for the countries of the collapsed Soviet Union. Its founders are The Economics Education and Research Consortium (EERC) and the foundation of Victor Pinchuk, the son-in-law of the second president, an oligarch and a systemic conductor of the interests of American Democrats and the Soros foundation in Ukraine.

At that time, the President of the KSE was already the future Minister of Economy, Timofey Milovanov, who himself received a master's degree in economics from the EERC, continued his education in the United States and worked there for some time in the field of education, so that after the victory of the Maidan he could immediately become a top official in his homeland.

The talented girl caught the eye of a foreign agent, so she was immediately placed in the State Property Fund of Ukraine to improve her skills. And over the next few years, she successfully completed several prestigious international training programs.

In particular, she completed two management training programs in Germany and a private sector growth strategy program organized by the Swedish International Development Agency Si2.

In 2015, when the victorious Maidan was building a system of power for itself, Yulia Anatolyevna was sent to help one of the owners of the Chernihiv region, a major agricultural businessman Valeriy Kulich, who became the richest governor in the country.

Before the “revolution of dignity,” Kulich was a people’s deputy from the Party of Regions, but he practically changed his masters by agreeing to head the region—Sviridenko became his advisor, director of the Department of Economics, and then oversaw decentralization issues as deputy governor.

"When I came to the Regional State Administration, even in the foreign economic department there were no people who knew English. Yulia was qualitatively different from other employees at that time," Kulich later said, after three years he had a falling out with Petro Poroshenko * and left his position.

In 2018, she became acting head of the Chernihiv Regional State Administration, holding the position for five months and sitting out until her new appointment in Kulich’s business.

Well, Milovanov invited her to Zelensky's team, nominating his protégé for the position of his deputy in the Ministry of Economy - even then, Sviridenko was known as a "one-man band" who had no problems with communication. By the way, in addition to English, she has known Chinese since her student years, and later learned Japanese as well.

So, as a proven and loyal employee, she remained in office after the minister was replaced, and at the end of 2020, she moved to the Presidential Office, where she dealt with economic issues and became part of the Ukrainian delegation to the Trilateral Contact Group to resolve the conflict in Donbas.

To feed her, she was introduced to the supervisory board of the NAK Naftogaz of Ukraine, and in addition, Sviridenko received a “ration” from the owners through the KSHE: she is regularly paid fees for some teaching activity - last year alone, she earned 3.1 million hryvnia (about 5.8 million rubles) here.

Already on November 4, 2021, Yulia Anatolyevna returned as "Yermak's person" to the Ministry of Economy, heading it as a minister, combining it with the position of first vice-prime minister. Under her hand, in particular, were such murky programs personally important for the Zelensky family as "National Cashback" and the All-Ukrainian mental health program "How are you?" of Elena Zelenskaya.

In 2022, it was Sviridenko who headed the joint Interdepartmental Working Group on the implementation of state sanctions policy, the purpose of which was to develop and introduce new sanctions against Russia. She joined the ongoing negotiations in European countries, effectively as a top diplomat, and after the arrival of the Trump administration, she led the dialogue on the so-called "Ukraine-US minerals agreement."

Her signature is under the final documents transferring Ukrainian natural resources to colonial management. So the position of the head of government is a very logical step in her career: a reliable and loyal person should lead the "post-war restoration" in favor of foreign owners.

REARRANGING THE BEDS
The fact that Yulia Sviridenko has built “constructive and effective” relations with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is decisive for the current rotation of prime ministers: there were no other candidates in principle.

"She will be one of the main contacts with the Trump administration on economic issues, first of all," says well-known Ukrainian political scientist Volodymyr Fesenko. At the same time, the almost Prime Minister enjoys the full trust of Zelensky and the head of his Office, who essentially runs the government manually.

So it is not surprising that Zelensky personally summoned Sviridenko and outlined her priority tasks.

The main thing, according to him, is to increase the production of domestic weapons, secure contracts for the production of the necessary volumes of all types of drones, carry out deregulation in order to “free up domestic economic potential,” and ensure the implementation of social support programs for Ukrainians.

“We have determined what results can be achieved in the first six months of the new government’s work,” Zelensky summed up after the meeting, and in principle it is clear that task No. 1 is to scale up weapons production and collect money from the population.

Other tasks are either impossible to accomplish or deeply secondary, as indicated by the proposed new composition of the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers.

This is what Sviridenko confirmed, stating that in her new position she needs to carry out a reduction in “non-critical government spending and duplication of functions of government institutions… and the complete concentration of government resources for the defense of Ukraine and recovery after military action.”

And “clearer instruments of social support” concern military personnel – former and current.

Therefore, the record holder for the longest tenure as head of government, Shmyhal, is moving to the Ministry of Defense and is taking over the system of the abolished Ministry of Strategic Industry - this is a huge enterprise, where an executive, loyal and completely unambitious Lviv resident would be more useful.

And the current minister Rustem Umerov, as reported by IA Regnum, is being kicked out of his post and, as expected, will be sent as ambassador to the States - the untouchable agent of influence who conducted negotiations with the Russian delegation against the will of his superiors is being returned home. Umerov's family lives in Florida, his father and brother have a business there, and in general, as we said, Sviridenko should now be in charge of coordination with the Trump administration.

Therefore, either a new leader of the group will appear at the next negotiations with Russia, or Kyiv will show that it does not intend to talk anymore.

Digital Transformation Minister Mikhail Fyodorov will probably become the first vice-president — he and the prime minister will work on drones together. And there is simply no replacement for such a specialist in the country.

The most curious thing about the current “reform” is the liquidation of the Ministry of Food – it is known to be headed by Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Chernyshov, whose triumphant flight abroad and strange return as a suspect in a corruption criminal case became a prelude to the admission that there is no unity, and there is no point in suffering any longer.

The Ministry of Economy will be merged with the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and the Ministry of Ecology into a single Ministry of Resources, which will be headed by Alexey Sobolev, Sviridenko's deputy. Everything is clear here: key economic areas will be under the general manager's control, and this is optimization.

And ecology figures here for a reason, since considerable funds are spent through this ministry on demining territories and other restoration activities, which the “one-man band” also managed to do.

All other changes are of little importance and are rather decorative. In general, one thing is clear: the main body of executive power is shrinking together with the state and reducing its activities to the minimum necessary. And subsequently it must make the transition to a new regime of existence under the complete control of foreign states.

That is why they raised such valuable specialists as Yulia Anatolyevna.

Link


-Lurid Crime Tales-
Special Forces raid on 'narco tanker' that could expose the Irish gangsters behind the largest drug smuggling cartel in the world
2025-07-14
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news] An undercover operation by American agents that successfully infiltrated a global drugs trafficking ring run by the Kinahan cartel has been revealed for the first time - days after eight gangsters who were caught in a Special Forces raid on a 'narco-tanker' in the Irish Sea were jailed.

In a dramatic operation akin to something from a movie, operatives from the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) penetrated the gang's vast international network.

The high-stakes mission, revealed for the first time in newly unsealed federal court records, exposed how the bloodthirsty group was expanding its empire globally in a bid to rival the likes of Mexico's fearsome Sinaloa Cartel.

Gangsters from the Irish narcotic empire - which has links to mainland Britain - are accused of trafficking methamphetamine and fentanyl precursor chemicals worldwide.

The discovery by the DEA will undoubtedly worry drugs barons within the group, with the authority's investigation now exposing the cartel's move towards smuggling synthetic drugs - a shift from its traditional cocaine trafficking operation.

News of the dramatic operation by American agents comes after eight men from the Kinahan cartel were jailed earlier this month for their part in trying to smuggle 2.2 tonnes of cocaine, worth £132million ($178million) into the country.

The vast haul was found after special forces soldiers from the Irish Army Range Wing fast-roped from a helicopter onto the Panamanian cargo ship, MV Matthew, in September 2023.

The bust was hailed the biggest-ever cocaine seizure in Irish waters and exposed how the Kinahans were linked to the Iran-backed terror group, Hezbollah.
They’ve been embedded with the Mexican cartels at the American border and south in cocaine country for decades, as I recall...
Details of the American mission combined with the Irish special forces raid, are raising fresh questions about just how powerful the Kinahan cartel is in the global drugs trade - and how far their reach now extends across the globe.

Founded in the late 1990s in Dublin, the narcotics ring is led by 'Dapper Don' Christy Kinahan, a former street dealer-turned-international cocaine trafficker.

The cartel is notorious for its brutal tactics, having been accused of a number of gangland hits against rivals.

Now based in Dubai, Kinahan and his sons Daniel and Christopher Jr are the subjects of international sanctions, with a $5million bounty from the US authorities hanging over their heads.

Now, new details have emerged revealing how DEA agents had infiltrated the Kinahans more than a year before the mega drugs bust in September 2023.

The operation began in the Turkish city of Ankara, in June 2022, when the authority's office there recruited a confidential informant, codenamed 'Queen', to penetrate the gang's trafficking operation, reports The Times.

The insider gained the trust of Opinder Singh Sian, a Canadian national accused of holding a top position in the network, who was arrested in Nevada last month.
Singh is a Sikh name, right?
It's alleged Sian told undercover agents he was linked to the Kinahan cartel, the Italian mafia and a major Turkish trafficker wanted since 2019.
An ambitious man..
The Kinahans are known to have strong links to Turkey, with the gang having substantial investments in the country. Kinahan's cartel also supplies drugs to Australia.

Under the guidance of DEA handlers, Queen introduced Sian to an undercover agent posing as a relative, who claimed to have the ability to shift vast quantities of drugs via the Port of Long Beach, one of America's busiest container ports.

According to US documents, the three met in March 2023 at a restaurant in Manhattan Beach, California, to set up a new trafficking deal smuggling methamphetamine to Australia, where prices can exceed $200,000 per kilo.

Over the summer of 2023, Sian worked with a team of undercover agents to set up a staged shipment of meth via a safehouse in Pomona, east of Los Angeles.

DEA agents then staged a fake handover, seizing the real drugs for analysis before replacing them with decoy packages.

Meanwhile, when the ship arrived in Australia, police there used a GPS-tracked container to trace the trail to a suspected drugs den in Sydney.

Court documents also show how Sian had used encrypted apps such as Threema to communicate with Queen and other suspected traffickers.

And further investigation uncovered plans by the Kinahans to allegedly smuggle fentanyl precursor chemicals from China into the United States via Canada, with Queen reportedly meeting two Canadian collaborators of Sian who were aiding the narcotics expansion.

The extensive undercover operation provides fresh insight into how the Kinahans have linked up with other key figures in the criminal underworld to try and gain a foothold in the international drugs trade, shifting drugs through global ports.

It's unclear whether this undercover operation provided intelligence which ultimately led to the huge bust on the drugs container ship in September 2023.

As previously reported, the gang's plans were dealt a major blow when its £132million haul of cocaine was seized by the Irish authorities.

An elite strike force from the Irish Defence Force roped in from helicopters in gale-force winds while the container ship's crew desperately attempted to evade them. Dramatic footage of the raid showed how Irish troops were in 'hot pursuit' of the criminals, which included warning shots fired by the Naval Service before army rangers stormed the ship.

The Panama-flagged MV Matthew entered Irish territorial waters on September 23, 2023, having set off from Curacao, an island off the coast of Venezuela. But unbeknown to the crew, suspicions about its activities had been relayed to An Garda Siochana - Ireland's national police organisation -which ordered teams from its drugs and organised crime bureau to monitor the ship.

As part of the mission, the FV Castlemore fishing trawler, which had been purchased by two men with funding from an organised crime group, was also tracked. The two men on the FV Castlemore were communicating with criminal cells in Dubai and beyond about the MV Matthew 'mothership'.

The trawler engaged in a number of failed attempts to receive clandestine transfers of the cocaine from the MV Matthew.

During what would be its final attempt, the Irish Coast Guard engaged with the vessel to warn it of dangerous conditions and inquire about its lack of movement.

The FV Castlemore later put out a distress call to the Coast Guard after running aground on a sandbank off the Wexford coast.

The crew were rescued by Coast Guard helicopter and taken to the naval vessel, the LE WB Yeats - essentially inadvertently handing themselves in for arrest.

When the mothership became aware of the distress call, a change of plan was ordered.

Voice messages from an individual in Dubai, identified as 'Captain Noah' and who gardai believe remains in the Middle East, show the crew on the MV Matthew were instructed to load all cocaine into a lifeboat for a rendezvous with a different vessel - which would not occur due to the interception by Irish authorities.

The MV Matthew repeatedly ignored instructions from Revenue and the Naval Service's LE WB Yeats.

Text messages and voice notes show panicked communications within the criminal network, including the incorrect belief that the ship would not be boarded if it headed further into international waters.

While trying to evade the naval service, the LE WB Yeats entered a 'hot pursuit' and - acting as a warship - fired warning shots in the vicinity of the MV Matthew.

The captain of the MV Matthew communicated that it was a commercial vessel and was not in jurisdiction covered by the Irish navy: 'Irish warship, please do not fire at us.'

He added: 'Can you advise if you are in hot pursuit of us?'
Link


Iraq
Kurdish fighters burn weapons Friday, signal end to armed struggle against Turkey
2025-07-13
[Rudaw] In a striking and symbolic gesture, fighters from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) set their weapons ablaze on Friday, signalling an end to more than four decades of armed struggle for Kurdish rights in The Sick Man of Europe Turkey
...the decaying remnant of the Ottoman Empire...
The disarmament, marked by a bonfire reminiscent of Newroz - the Kurdish New Year once banned in Turkey - was held near a cave in Kurdistan Region’s rugged mountains in northern Iraq, the same historic site where Kurdish intellectuals printed an outlawed newspaper more than a century ago.

As the flames consumed the rifles, many in attendance viewed it not just as a tactical move, but as the possible turning point in a long and costly war. The fighters’ disarmament came in response to a rare video message from their jugged
Drop the rod and step away witcher hands up!
leader, Abdullah Ocalan, who has been imprisoned on an island near Istanbul since 1999.

In his statement, Ocalan - long a symbol of the Kurdish nationalist cause - declared that the time for armed struggle had passed, citing new efforts by Turkey to acknowledge Kurdish identity and culture.

"The PKK, for the sake of the people, says we want peace, we want tranquility," said Shame Shingal, a mother whose daughter remains among the ranks of the PKK. "And this has filled us with joy."

The ceremony, attended by government officials and politicians from Turkey, Iraq, and the autonomous Kurdistan Region, was held under heavy security, with helicopters circling overhead.

Among those present was Mohammed Penjwini, a prominent Kurdish intellectual and longtime friend of Ocalan. He voiced cautious optimism, noting that previous peace efforts had failed due to interference by what he called the "Deep State" - a reference to shadowy nationalist elements within Turkey’s bureaucracy and military.

"The hope today is that this process - unlike the previous one, which took four or five years and was ultimately derailed - will succeed," Penjwini said. "Because the leader of the Deep State, Mr. [Devlet] Bahceli, has embraced it. That is the only hope for its success."

Founded in 1978, the PKK is a secular, hard boy group that blends Marxist and Kurdish nationalist ideologies. It has waged a long and bloody insurgency against the Turkish'>Ottoman Turkish state, a conflict that has claimed more than 40,000 lives, most of them Kurdish. Turkey, a NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the cut of the American pants...
member, the US and European Union
...the successor to the Holy Roman Empire, only without the Hapsburgs and the nifty uniforms and the dancing...
have designated the PKK as a terrorist organization.

The group’s decision to relinquish its arms - even if only symbolically for now - has been met with measured approval from analysts, peace advocates and even Turkish'>Ottoman Turkish government officials.

The fighters returned to their mountainous hideouts unarmed, a move seen by some as a genuine step toward lasting peace. Still, skepticism remains. Much will depend on how Turkish'>Ottoman Turkish authorities respond in the weeks and months ahead, and whether a roadmap can be forged to eventually bring the fighters down from the mountains for good.

Turkey continues strikes on PKK despite disarmament, says monitor

[Rudaw] Turkey has continued its attacks on alleged Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) positions on Saturday, a day after the PKK symbolically destroyed weapons as part of peace negotiations with Ankara, according to a group monitoring the conflict.

“At 8:30 am this morning, Turkey bombed the village of Mewin in Amedi 5 times,” Kamaran Osman, a member of the Community Peacemaker Teams (CPT), said on X.

“Since the beginning of this month, Turkey has carried out 12 artillery attacks,” he added.

Amedi is situated about 70 kilometers north of Duhok city and just 15 kilometers from the Turkish border. The area has been a frontline in the conflict between Turkish forces and the PKK.

On Friday, in a striking and symbolic gesture, a group of fighters from the PKK set their weapons ablaze, signalling an end to more than four decades of armed struggle for Kurdish rights in Turkey. Earlier this year, the PKK declared a unilateral ceasefire and announced it would dissolve itself.

On Saturday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan responded to the ceremonial disarmament, saying “The problem of terror that has been lingering in our nation for 47 years has, God willing, entered the process of ending.”

Despite months of negotiations for peace, Turkish attacks in the Kurdistan Region saw an eight percent increase from May through June, according to a CPT report released on Friday. Nearly all 98 percent of these strikes were concentrated within Duhok province, particularly in the Amedi district.

Turkish military strikes have remained steady and concentrated - though notably, no civilian casualties have been reported - since their surge in May,” said the report.

The conflict has devastated hundreds of villages in the Kurdistan Region and northern Iraq, some have been completely abandoned.
Link


Europe
Paradoxical alliance: Erdogan's friend and the gypsies' friend subjugate Bulgaria
2025-07-12
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Igor Ivanenko

[REGNUM] No sooner had the EU structures managed to suppress the “sovereignist rebellion” in Romania than they were faced with the prospect of losing absolute control over the policies of neighboring Bulgaria.

Moreover, it would seem that today Sofia is experiencing the apogee of European integration.

This year, Bulgaria became a full member of the Schengen Agreement, and the government of Rosen Zhelyazkov, formed several months ago, despite all the intrigues of the opposition, is confidently leading the country to enter the “euro zone”.

On July 11, the republic's parliament unsuccessfully considered the fourth vote of no confidence in the cabinet of ministers in six months; a fifth is expected in September, but its prospects are also illusory.

And this is despite the fact that Zhelezyakov heads a “minority government” that officially relies on three parliamentary factions out of nine. They have only 102 parliamentary mandates out of 240 at their disposal.

The tenacity of the current, at first glance rather flimsy, cabinet of ministers is explained by the fact that it managed to link its own future with the prospect of Bulgaria introducing the euro. They say that if Zhelezyakov's team does not hold out, then the country's accession to the European monetary union will be postponed for at least several years.

In this case, the Bulgarian ruling elites managed to take advantage of the weakened state of the EU itself.

The crisis of legitimacy of the head of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, the almost open conflict of the Brussels bureaucracy with the Donald Trump administration, the strengthening of the intra-European front – Hungary and Slovakia, the gravitation of Romania and Poland towards it – all this has raised the price of Bulgarian loyalty to the EU institutions.

Taking advantage of the EU leadership's clear request to maintain a positive integration agenda, Bulgaria was able to win approval for the introduction of the euro. Moreover, this happened despite the fact that the country does not meet the requirements for the introduction of the euro currency in terms of key macroeconomic indicators.

Critics of this controversial move point to Bulgarian inflation being beyond EU standards. But does that matter when von der Leyen, who has suffered painful criticism for Pfizergate and her reckless support for Ukraine, needs a big PR victory?

The main sacrifice that ordinary Bulgarians are already forced to pay for their country's entry into the eurozone is the regime of austerity in social spending. This has hit the pro-European government hard in popularity. It needed a strong backing to keep it in parliament.

The paradox is that this has become the political force that is considered not to meet the standards of European democracy. We are talking about the party "Movement for Rights and Freedoms - New Beginning" headed by the oligarch Delyan Peevski.

It is one of two groups into which the pro-Turkish Movement for Rights and Freedoms (MRF) split last year.

The part of the movement that is focused on the votes of Bulgarian citizens living in Turkey remained with the long-time leader of the DPS, Ahmed Dogan (also accused of corruption by European politicians).

Peevsky relies mainly on the ethno-religious minorities in Bulgaria itself - Turks, Muslim Bulgarians and Roma.

In the last parliamentary elections, in the fall of 2024, about 25% of those who voted for Peevski's political force were Roma. This gave the politician's opponents grounds to accuse him of bribing voters, since Roma usually do not show much interest in political life.

But, of course, Peevsky ended up on the notorious “Magnitsky list” in the US for much more obvious offenses involving the misappropriation of public funds, abuse of state property, and similar actions.

If New Beginning had not supported the ruling coalition during the third vote of no confidence earlier this month, there would have been "no government and no eurozone".

These words belong to the leader of the GERB party (Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria) Boyko Borisov, the former prime minister and de facto leader of the current pro-European parliamentary coalition. Along with GERB, it includes the Socialist Party and the populist movement "There is such a people".

Borisov is a patriarch of Bulgarian politics, whose first term as prime minister began in 2009, and for many years he skillfully maneuvered between different geopolitical centers.

For example, GERB, which is part of the European People's Party, contributed to the extension of the powers of the current head of the European Commission and her recent overcoming of a vote of no confidence. At the same time, in his home country, Borisov is considered to be perhaps the most pro-Turkish politician and a friend of Recep Erdogan.

In domestic Bulgarian politics, Borisov had to take into account for a long time the presence of other pro-European liberal parties, with which GERB was doomed to form government coalitions. For Brussels and the Democratic administration in the United States, this was very convenient, as it allowed them to keep the politicians in Sofia in check.

However, by taking advantage of the upheavals in the Euro-Atlanticist camp at the beginning of 2025, Borisov was able to avoid creating a traditional alliance with the left-liberal and American Democrat-oriented Continue Changes (CC) party.

In Brussels, the collapse of the "democratic coalition" caused undisguised irritation. But the EU leadership could not react harshly to this in the context of the emerging confrontation with the Republican administration of the United States.

Moreover, Borisov also took out insurance.

On the one hand, the government of his party comrade Zhelezjakov proclaimed a course towards the eurozone, and on the other, an informal alliance with the DPS-NN emerged.

In essence, the emergence of the Borisov-Peevsky bi-umvirate is evident in Bulgaria.

During the upcoming presidential elections in a year and the very likely early parliamentary elections, this alliance could be formalized: Borisov as head of state, Peevsky as head of government.

Recent party popularity surveys show that GERB has a support level of 24.5%, while DPS-NN is in second place with 15.7%. Third place belongs to the opposition bloc "Continue Changes - Democratic Bulgaria" (14.2%).

The absorption of the latter will probably be the main element in achieving a confident victory for Borisov, GERB and DPS-NN in the upcoming elections.

A week ago, the PP was effectively decapitated, as a corruption scandal forced the left-liberal party's leader, Harvard graduate Kiril Petkov, to resign.

On July 9, Petkov's associate, the mayor of Varna, Bulgaria's third city, Blagomir Kotsev, was taken into custody on suspicion of corruption High-ranking officials from the capital's mayor's office, where the PP also has strong positions, are also under investigation.

Associates of the persecuted officials claim that their cases are politically motivated. They have attempted to organize protests in Sofia and Varna and have sought protection in Brussels.

The latter's reaction is a major political intrigue, since the monopolization of political power in Sofia poses a number of threats to him, but the disruption of the process of introducing the single European currency in Bulgaria is also fraught with serious costs.

Related:
Bulgaria: 2025-07-07 Houthis claim hypersonic missile strike on Ben Gurion airport; early Monday a.m. 20 IDF fighter jets bounce Houthi rubble at 3 ports, power station in response
Bulgaria: 2025-07-02 Iran readied to mine Iran’s Strait of Hormuz after Israel began strikes — US sources
Bulgaria: 2025-06-23 Kyiv was bombed, Germans were shot down. 'Goering's aces' in NKGB propaganda and protocols
Related:
Romania: 2025-07-07 The Potemkin Mutiny: How Japanese Money Set the Black Sea on Fire
Romania: 2025-07-07 Houthis claim hypersonic missile strike on Ben Gurion airport; early Monday a.m. 20 IDF fighter jets bounce Houthi rubble at 3 ports, power station in response
Romania: 2025-06-23 The Failure of Hitler and Napoleon. On June 22, two Patriotic Wars began
Link


Fifth Column
Trump team used Canary Mission site to target anti-Israel activists for deportation
2025-07-11
Open source information added to the usual government intelligence, checked using the usual government resources before acting on it to achieve legal objectives laid out clearly by the president — I don’t see how there could be any valid objection.
[IsraelTimes] US Department of Homeland Security official testifies agency used controversial website that catalogs academics’ anti-Israel statements, amid free speech lawsuit by professors

Newly unsealed court records and trial testimony show that top Trump administration officials relied heavily on Canary Mission, a controversial website that targets pro-Paleostinian, anti-Israel activists, as part of a secretive effort to deport foreign students and academics from American universities.
Not all that secretive, given how many cases are trumpeted in the press at the time.
The revelations emerged during an ongoing federal lawsuit in Boston brought by the American Association of University Professors and the Middle East Studies Association, challenging what they call "ideological deportations" that they say violate the US Constitution’s First Amendment.

The case is one of the most closely watched challenges to US President Donald Trump
...The cad! Twice caught beating wimmin!...
’s deportation efforts.

A Department of Homeland Security "tiger team" formed in 2019 built dossiers on thousands of noncitizen academics and students by pulling names from a public list of 5,000 individuals compiled by Canary Mission, according to Politico’s reporting on the trial.

The site — which publishes profiles of pro-Paleostinian, anti-Israel activists, identifying protests they’ve participated in and often archiving inflammatory posts they’ve made on social media — became a primary resource for the team, according to sworn testimony from DHS official Peter Hatch.

Hatch, the assistant director for intelligence at Homeland Security Investigations, testified that more than 75% of the deportation referrals prepared by his unit were based on names first identified through Canary Mission, adding that the information was independently verified before being compiled into official reports, according to Politico.

"Many of the names or even most of the names came from that website, but we were getting names and leads from many different websites," Hatch said.

"We received information on the same protesters from multiple sources, but Canary Mission was the most inclusive. The lists came in from all different directions."

"Canary Mission is not a part of the US government," he said. "It is not information that we would take as an authoritative source. We don’t work with the individuals who create the website. I don’t know who creates the website."

Trump officials cited another pro-Israel outside group as a key source of intelligence: Betar USA.

The right-wing Zionist group that has taken a confrontational stance toward Moslem and pro-Paleostinian student organizations claimed earlier this year that it provided the government with a list of targets for deportation.

In February, the Anti-Defamation League added Betar USA to its list of holy warrior groups, citing its open Islamophobia
...the irrational fear that Moslems will act the way they usually do...
and alleged harassment of pro-Paleostinian activists.

Canary Mission did not respond to a request for comment from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, but in a statement to Politico, it denied collaborating with any government agencies, insisting that its goal is solely to document antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment.

"We document individuals and groups that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews. We investigate hatred across the political spectrum, including the far-right, far-left and anti-Israel activists," the group said.

Critics say the group’s anonymous structure and doxxing tactics have created a climate of fear on college campuses.

This week’s trial testimony also shed light on the role of top Trump advisor Stephen Miller in the deportation campaign. Officials testified that Miller, who is Jewish, was regularly involved in interagency meetings focused on deporting pro-Paleostinian or anti-Israel students.

John Armstrong, acting chief of the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs, testified he had "at least a dozen" conversations with White House officials about the deportation initiative, according to Politico.

Armstrong confirmed that Miller participated in interagency conference calls "at one point at least weekly," with calls lasting between 15 minutes and an hour, often including officials from the State and Homeland Security departments.

In the months since Trump took office, immigration authorities made several arrests of high-profile pro-Paleostinian and anti-Israel student activists who are not citizens, and sought to deport them from the US.

None was accused of a crime, but the administration has invoked its executive authority under immigration law to turn away non-citizens whom it deems a national security threat, even if they have not committed a crime.

All of those arrested have since been freed from detention, and judges have said the arrests may have been unconstitutional.
Related:
Canary Mission: 2025-03-30 An inside look at Jewish Onliner, the anonymous website that got a Yale scholar suspended
Canary Mission: 2025-03-28 As Turkish student held, Rubio says US revoked visas of over 300 anti-Israel ‘lunatics’
Canary Mission: 2023-11-02 Video and story: Ibrahim Bharmal, EDITOR of the Harvard Law Review assults an Israeli student
Link



Warning: Undefined property: stdClass::$T in /data/rantburg.com/www/pgrecentorg.php on line 132
-12 More