Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
RUMINT: US, Israel discuss US heading temporary postwar administration of Gaza, say sources |
2025-05-08 |
Anonymous sources say: [IsraelTimes] The United States and Israel have discussed the possibility of Washington leading a temporary postwar administration of Gazoo...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppressionand disproportionate response... , according to five people familiar with the matter. The "high-level" consultations have centered around a transitional government headed by a US official that would oversee Gaza until it has been demilitarized and stabilized, and a viable Paleostinian administration had emerged, the sources say. According to the discussions, which remain preliminary, there would be no fixed timeline for how long such a US-led administration would last, and it would depend on the situation on the ground, the five sources say. The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss the talks publicly, compare the proposal to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq that Washington established in 2003, shortly after the US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. The authority was perceived by many Iraqis as an occupying force and it transferred power to an interim Iraqi government in 2004 after failing to contain a growing insurgency. Other countries would be invited to take part in the US-led authority in Gaza, the sources say, without identifying which ones. They say the administration would draw on Paleostinian technocrats but would exclude Hamas ![]() and the Paleostinian Authority. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |
War Without Victory Day: How Russia Almost Lost Chechnya | |
2024-12-12 | |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. Back in the good old days, I read Lester Grau's narrative on the Battle of Grozny from the website of the US Army's Office of Foreign Military Studies. You can find one of his works published in 1996 here. Not the same as the article I read, but it is engaging if interested in this period of Russian military history. Like me, Grau is a student of Russian military history, and has a number of books published on the matter. by Andrey Zvorykin [REGNUM] "Our war began on the morning of December 11, 1994... And we don't have our own Victory Day," these words of Andrei Palachev, a veteran of the first Chechen war and participant in the battles in Grozny, are perhaps typical for memoirs about the events of thirty years ago. In any case, the expression "a war without a Victory Day" is often found in the testimonies of veterans who, in the mid-nineties, were on average about twenty years old, like the Primorsky OMON fighter Palachev. ![]() "As the poet said: "You can't make drums out of our skin - it's thin. Napoleonic plans are often pulled out of thin air," - these are already lines from the memoirs of General Gennady Troshev, who during the years of the first Chechen campaign was the commander of the Joint Group of Forces of the Russian Ministry of Defense. The war began with the failed December assault on Grozny, cost the lives of 5 to 14 thousand “federals,” as the Russian press called Russian soldiers at the time, and ended with the Khasavyurt Peace Treaty in August 1996, which effectively handed victory to the Islamists and separatists of “Ichkeria”*. "DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES" "Any war is started and ended by politicians. Can the political decision to send troops in December 1994 be considered an adventure? To some extent, yes," admitted General Troshev, for whom Grozny was no stranger - he spent his childhood there. "To some extent" - because by the end of 1994 there were clearly no other ways, except military ones, to liquidate the criminal-terrorist regime that had seized power in Chechnya. But seized it at least with the connivance of the federal center. In June 1991, even before the GKChP putsch, the leader of the All-National Congress of the Chechen People (ANCP), former Soviet Air Force Colonel General Dzhokhar Dudayev took control of part of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR. In July of the same year, Dudayev announced the secession of the "Chechen Republic of Nokhchi-cho" from the RSFSR and the USSR. The federal leadership of the time — President Boris Yeltsin, Vice President Aleksandr Rutskoi, and Supreme Council Speaker Ruslan Khasbulatov — clearly had other things on their minds. On the eve of the collapse of the USSR, for example, the redistribution of Union property seemed more important. Radicals from the “general democratic forces of Chechnya” were seen as allies in the fight against the “reactionary party bureaucrats.” When on September 6, 1991, Dudayev’s “guard” stormed the building of the Supreme Council of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR, the television center and the radio house (during these events, the first blood of this conflict was shed, the head of the Grozny city council, Vitaly Kutsenko, was thrown out of a window), Khasbulatov sent a telegram to his small homeland: “A favorable political situation has finally arisen, in which the democratic processes taking place in the republic are being freed from overt and covert shackles…” In November 1991, the federal government tried to solve the Dudayev problem with a cavalry charge. Yeltsin declared a state of emergency in Chechnya, and to pacify the separatists, not even the notorious "two parachute regiments" were sent, but one "transport plane" with special forces of the Airborne Forces. At the Grozny airport, Dudayev's men blocked the plane and "offered" the fighters to return in a friendly manner. THE KINGDOM OF THE "COCKROACH MUSTACHE" While the rest of Russia was experiencing the shock of Gaidar’s reforms and was drawn into the confrontation between Yeltsin and the same Khasbulatov and Rutskoi, in Chechnya the process of the semi-disintegration of the state (which was also evident in Tatarstan, the Urals, and other parts of the weakened country) had gone too far. By June 1992, de jure, the Russian Armed Forces had left the region, leaving the militants with a huge amount of military equipment and ammunition depots. According to the agreement signed with Dudayev by Defense Minister Pavel Grachev, the "Ichkerians" were to receive half of the arsenal - but in reality, our officers could only take their service weapons. This is how the separatists got their army. At the same time, the federal center continued to financially support Chechnya, which had not signed the federal treaty. Thus, in 1993, the republic was allocated 11.5 billion rubles for social payments. The money did not reach the recipients, but ended up in the pockets of the leadership of "Ichkeria", including the military leaders of the separatists. Dudayev "stopped paying pensions to old people, teachers' salaries... Schools closed. It was enough of a primary education for us, if only they could count money," recalled a builder from Grozny, Gunki Khukiev. Only criminal elements could count money in the "independent state." The center "did not notice" the notorious Chechen avisos - the execution of a fake transaction with the subsequent "disappearance" of the swindlers. According to experts, more than 4 trillion rubles of the then rubles were received from these avisos. They also failed to notice the displacement of the non-Chechen population - essentially, ethnic cleansing. If according to the 1989 census, 294 thousand Russians lived in the Chechen-Ingush ASSR (with a total population of 1 million 270 thousand), and 270 thousand Russians out of a population of 397 thousand lived in Grozny, then in the 21st century, about 1.9% of ethnic Russians live in the Chechen Republic, about 24 thousand people. About 250 thousand people left the republic even before the start of the first campaign. Already in the first half of the 1990s, the rampant banditry (including armed banditry) sobered up many residents of the "sovereign state", especially city dwellers. "My brother... got nothing from the revolutionary pie, now he called his idol Dudayev nothing other than "ts1eza mekhash" (cockroach mustache). There were tens of thousands of such repentants," Khukiev recalled. But the leaders of Ichkeria already felt strong enough to suppress any discontent. On June 4, 1993, field commander Shamil Basayev made his presence known for the first time - his fighters stormed the headquarters of the anti-Dudayev opposition, which was headed by the mayor of Grozny Bislan Gantamirov (who had previously had a falling out with Dudayev over the income from the oil business). The Ichkerians were making plans to "export the revolution." It was not for nothing that Dudayev gave shelter to the ousted former President of Georgia Zviad Gamsakhurdia and simultaneously supported the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus, whose militias had recently fought against the Georgians in Abkhazia. PROLOGUE TO THE WAR. THE "GANTAMIROV" ASSAULT The federal center, having “blown away” Chechen separatism, decided to play its own subtle game, overthrowing Dudayev with the hands of the opposition, which became a more or less organized force after the “president of Ichkeria” dissolved the Chechen parliament. The opposition was supported by the urban population (which was gathered under the wing of Dudayev's personal enemy, Gantamirov) and some clan leaders who did not fit into Dudayev's system. An example is the former head of Dudayev's security, Ruslan Labazanov, who spoke out against Dudayev's men on the side of the Russian Armed Forces, but was not much different from them in essence. In the summer of 1994, a civil war broke out in Chechnya between the "president of Ichkeria" and the militants loyal to him (led by Basayev and Ruslan Gelayev ) on one side and the Provisional Council of the Chechen Republic on the other. Several "federal" tank crews appeared at the disposal of the opposition. Gantamirov and Labazanov's militia took control of the cities of Urus-Martan and Argun and on November 26, 1994, they moved on Grozny. After the first shelling from Dudayev's men, the opposition infantry scattered, the tank crews, left without cover and not knowing the terrain, found themselves in a hopeless situation, 28 of them were taken prisoner, about 18 (data based on lists of names) were killed. This event had a decisive impact on Yeltsin's decision to send in troops. On December 9, he signed a decree "On measures to suppress the activities of illegal armed formations on the territory of the Chechen Republic and in the Ossetian-Ingush conflict zone." A few days before, on December 1, a Russian air raid completely destroyed the planes that had been captured and bought by the separatists. “THEY DIDN’T EVEN HAVE TIME TO COME UP WITH A NAME” Finally, on December 11, 1994, units of the Russian Armed Forces, in accordance with Yeltsin’s decree, entered the Russian region of Chechnya. The troops advanced in three groups. The first, under the command of Lieutenant General Vladimir Chilindin, advanced from the northwest, from the Mozdok region of North Ossetia. The second, from Vladikavkaz, under the command of Lieutenant General Alexander Chindarov, moved from the northwest through Ingushetia. The third, from Kizlyar, under the command of Lieutenant General Lev Rokhlin, headed from the northeast from the territory of Dagestan. The overall command of the operation to restore constitutional order was entrusted to Defense Minister Grachev. "Pavel Grachev brought the army to a terrible state," Rokhlin later lamented. This concerned supplies, weapons, and the level of training of conscripts. However, it is unlikely that the problem was solely Grachev's, since he did not possess such outstanding abilities to destroy the mighty army organism to its foundations in just a few years. Structural problems in the armed forces arose much earlier. An important point: it was difficult to talk about broad public support for the military operation. The media, controlled by media oligarchs Vladimir Gusinsky and Boris Berezovsky, broadcast if not a pro-Dudaev, then a "neutral" position. Not only liberals, but also the left opposition, including the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, criticized the operation. Meanwhile, our group's problems began almost immediately: only the Mozdok group achieved relative success, reaching the village of Dolinskoye (10 kilometers from Grozny) the next day. The Vladikavkaz and Kizlyar groups were soon blocked and forced to either break through with a fight or bypass enemy-controlled settlements along a longer route. Finally, 16 days after the start of the march (according to the plan, 3 days were given for the advance), all groups reached Grozny, blockading it from three sides. General Troshev later noted : "According to some generals, the initiative for the "festive" New Year's assault on Grozny belonged to people from Pavel Grachev's inner circle, in order to coincide the capture of the city with the birthday of the Russian Minister of Defense (January 1). I don't know how serious this is. Another thing is that the operation was prepared hastily, without a real assessment of the enemy, his forces and resources, without careful preparation. This is a fact. They didn't even have time to come up with a name for this operation!" "GOD, HELP ME BREAK FREE..." The southern outskirts of Grozny remained unblocked. It was assumed that civilians would be evacuated this way, but in fact the militants were receiving supplies from here throughout the assault. On December 19, the first bombing attack was carried out on the city center, and on the 31st, the bloodiest battle of the war began - the storming of Grozny. According to General Troshev, "many commanders with big stars, federal-level chiefs, believed that it was enough to go to Grozny, fire a couple of times in the air, and that would be the end of it." The military leader believed that it was precisely this method of intimidation that was the basis for the hastily approved plan to take Grozny, and, Troshev believed, it was approved "at the very top." About 250 units of equipment entered the city with infantry cover, but the fallacy of this plan soon became apparent. The number of militants, their wide variety of anti-tank weapons, and their completely fanatical resistance were unexpected. The units of the northern group were the most unlucky. The fighters of the 131st Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade (better known as the Maikop brigade) received an order from the commander of the "North" group, Konstantin Pulikovsky : together with the motorized riflemen and tankers of the 81st Motorized Rifle Regiment (who had 10 tanks at their disposal), reach the city center and fortify themselves in the railway station building. The combined group of "Maikopts" and fighters of the 81st regiment carried out the order, but by 19:00 the station they had occupied was surrounded by superior forces of militants. When reinforcements broke through here on the evening of January 1, no more than a third of the defenders remained alive. The commander of the 131st brigade, Colonel Ivan Savin, was also killed in the battle. Captain Vyacheslav Mironov, a participant in subsequent battles in Grozny, testifies in his book I Was In This War: “As we approached the railway station, we began to come across burnt, mutilated equipment and many corpses. Our corpses, our Slavic brothers, were all that remained of the Maikop Brigade, the one that was burned and shot by the “spirits” on New Year’s Eve from 1994 to 1995. God, help us escape…” HARD VICTORIES AND STRANGE DEFEATS War plans had to be changed on the fly and "in the field," Troshev noted. The troops held up in other directions changed their tactics by January 7, focusing on maneuverable groups, which gradually yielded results. On January 9, the Grozny Oil Institute and airport were occupied with heavy fighting, and on the 19th, the city center and the presidential palace. The militants retreated behind the Sunzha River. It was only on February 3 that the decision was made to close off the southern direction and completely blockade Grozny. The city was surrounded only by February 9. The Chechen capital was completely occupied by March 6, when Shamil Basayev's fighters retreated from Chernorechye, the last district in the hands of forces loyal to Dudayev. With the fall of Grozny, the actions of the Ichkerians finally acquired a partisan character - and our army was not ready for this. Although the entire flat part of Chechnya and most of the mountainous regions were occupied over the following months, the army was unable to actually ensure control over the territory. On the one hand, ambushes and raids by militants became frequent occurrences, and on the other, our troops repeatedly occupied the same "inhabitants", which were again captured by the separatists after the redeployment of the "federals". "One of the peculiarities of this strange war, which literally drove us crazy, is that we passed through and cleared the same villages several times. In the end, I studied the area so well that I could fight there blindfolded," the publication "Chelyabinsk Segodnya" cited the testimony of Alexander Berezovsky, who during the first Chechen war was the head of the reconnaissance group of the 17th detachment of the special forces of the internal troops "Edelweiss". A NEW TYPE OF ENEMY Thus, simultaneously with the exhaustion – moral and physical – of the Russian troops, the actions of the militants became ever bolder. Beginning in March 1996, raids on Grozny became an everyday reality. In addition to guerrilla warfare, the enemy used a method of warfare for which we were even less prepared – terror. On June 14, 1995, about two hundred of Basayev's militants broke through the border of Chechnya and Stavropol Krai and seized a hospital in Budyonnovsk. About 1,200 city residents were taken hostage, herded into the hospital buildings. After negotiations, Basayev's men were allowed to leave. At that time, 143 Russian fighters were killed (including 46 special forces), 415 were wounded, with enemy losses of 19 killed and 20 wounded. In January 1996, Salman Raduyev's group attacked the Dagestani city of Kizlyar. At the captured helicopter base, the bandits destroyed several units of equipment and took hostages. While security forces were approaching the city, the militants captured a hospital and a maternity hospital, driving about 3 thousand more residents there. During negotiations, the terrorists, along with some of the hostages, were released from the encirclement. Retreating, Raduyev's men also captured the village of Pervomayskoye. As a result, the terrorists were released. Also, in parallel with the military actions, the Ichkerians captured airplanes, buses, and attacked railways. In response, Russia took the first – and sometimes successful – steps in the fight against terrorism. Thus, on April 21, 1996, our special services managed to track the mobile communication channels of the "Generalissimo of Ichkeria" Dudayev. During a conversation with the State Duma deputy, liberal Konstantin Borovoy, two Su-24s struck the location of the separatist leader. Dudayev's successors as "presidents of Ichkeria" - Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev and Aslan Maskhadov - could no longer effectively control the "brigadier generals" and other field commanders. This defect in the system, however, would come back to haunt him in 1999, when the gangs of Basayev and Khattab attacked Dagestan without Maskhadov's knowledge. THE SECOND "OBSCENE WORLD" On August 6, 1996, the militants "turned the tide" of military operations: another attack on Grozny allowed them to take control of the city. At the same time, the separatists captured the large cities of Gudermes and Argun. The loss of three key centers, ongoing terrorist attacks, the shadow of Budyonnovsk and Kizlyar - all this demoralized the army. Yeltsin (who had recently narrowly escaped defeat in the elections) was threatened by the political consequences of continuing the conflict. Everything was pushing the federal center of that time to conclude peace on terms unfavorable for Russia. On August 31, in the Dagestani city of Khasavyurt, the Secretary of the Russian Security Council, Lieutenant General Alexander Lebed, and the "Chairman of the Government of Ichkeria" Aslan Maskhadov signed a ceasefire agreement. Russia was obliged to withdraw its troops from Chechen territory, and the decision on its political status was postponed until 2001. Later, the Khasavyurt agreements were compared with another “shameful peace” – the Brest peace. The Chechen people suffered first and foremost from the “peace”. The "Ichkeria" of 1996-1999 plunged into chaos and became not only a "hub" for drug trafficking and a sanctuary for criminals, but also a springboard for international terrorism. Instead of national separatists like the "Minister of Culture and Brigadier General" Akhmed Zakayev or the "Chechen Goebbels" Movladi Udugov, the leading role was played by supporters of Sharia rule and a worldwide caliphate. Maskhadov, elected president in 1997, not only failed to control his "prime minister" - the convinced Wahhabi Basayev, but also increasingly fell under the influence of foreign emissaries such as Khattab, Abu al-Walid and Abu Hafs al-Urdani. The transformation of the "Republic of Ichkeria" into the "Caucasus Emirate"*, which eventually swore allegiance to the "Islamic State"*,
THREE BOGATYRS SQUARE To correct political mistakes (which had been accumulating since the early 1990s and, in fact, led to the war) and miscalculations of the military command, whose Napoleonic plans did not always correspond to their capabilities, the Second Chechen Campaign was needed, no less difficult, but ended in success. A change in political leadership, a clear national policy and a change in the quality of military planning played their role. During the second campaign, the Russian army proved its combat capability, which it has repeatedly confirmed subsequently - in the defense of South Ossetia, in peacekeeping operations - and is confirming now, in the SVO zone, where units from Chechnya are also proving themselves. General Troshev died in 2008, having witnessed the beginning of the restoration of the republic under Akhmad-hadji and Ramzan Kadyrov — the military leader writes about the beginning of reconciliation in the finale of his memoirs. The afterword contains a vivid image. In one of the squares of Grozny in the 1970s, a monument was erected to three heroes of the Civil War: the Russian Odessan Nikolai Gikalo, the Chechen Aslanbek Sheripov and the Ingush Gapur Akhriev. "The people immediately nicknamed this place "the square of the three heroes," the general recalled. Under Maskhadov, there was a slave market here, near the monument, and executions were carried out here according to Sharia law. “The war destroyed the monument to the representatives of three nations. But the pedestal remained. Maybe the monument will be restored, or maybe a new one will be erected?” Troshev wondered and added, “I believe that nothing will ever destroy the surviving foundation, not even the war, which left a deep mark on people’s souls.” In 2008, Friendship of Nations Square was opened in Grozny after reconstruction, with a restored monument to the “three heroes”. | |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
'1991 Borders': Ukraine Stubbornly Demands What It Has Refused |
2024-10-04 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Denis Davydov and Vladislav Sovin [REGNUM] The mantra about returning the “1991 borders” in the Ukrainian version has long become an integral part of any international meetings, and Ukraine’s allies echo it in every possible way on this issue. Recently, the foreign ministers of the G7 countries stated that they will never recognize the annexation of Ukrainian regions by Russia and demanded that the Russian Federation abandon “its claims regarding the annexation of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions, as well as the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.” The formula about borders has become so familiar and categorical that no one even thinks that it fundamentally contradicts the concept that official Kyiv has been building for many years. After all, the borders of Ukraine as of 1991 are the borders of the Ukrainian SSR, a constituent part of the USSR, formed in this form thanks to the targeted policy of the Soviet state. At the same time, the modern Ukrainian concept of "state-building" categorically denies any connection with it, pursuing a policy of total "decommunization" and "decolonization". The countdown of Ukrainian statehood begins with the Ukrainian People's Republic (UPR) of the period 1917-1920, and the annexation of eastern Polish lands to the Ukrainian SSR is traditionally called occupation. Consequently, the size of the territory and the contours of the Ukrainian borders have no connection to 1991. Moreover, the redistribution of territories in Europe (and not only there) by Ukraine’s Western partners created enough precedents to no longer speak so categorically about Russia’s actions. "THERE IS TERRITORY UNDER THE CARRIAGE" As the first experience of independent nationalist statehood, the Ukrainian People's Republic of the early 20th century and its leaders are glorified at all levels - from school textbooks to monuments and street names. Symon Petliura, the head of the Directory of the UPR, is among the main national heroes. At the state level, various dates associated with this period of history are annually celebrated, in particular the so-called Day of Unity on January 22, when Zelensky invariably records another pompous address to the people. But then it is completely logical to consider the starting position and borders of the UPR - not those to which it formally claimed, but within which it actually existed. The first step was the proclamation by the Central Rada (the governing body of various Ukrainian organizations created in March 1917) of the autonomy of Ukraine within Russia. It was allowed within a limited framework by the then Provisional Government, which recognized this autonomy on the territory of five provinces: Kyiv, Volyn, Podolsk, Poltava and Chernigov (with the exception of part of its northern districts). The Kiev optimists did not receive the desired nine provinces and did not object to this; the text of the First Universal was read by Vladimir Vynnychenko on June 10 (23), 1917 at the Second All-Ukrainian Military Congress and proclaimed that, “without separating from all of Russia… the Ukrainian people must manage their own lives.” The following two Universals reinforced this position. Thus, the original territory of the autonomous Ukraine as part of Russia included only the central lands and part of the western ones, and its total area was significantly less than half of the territory of the Ukrainian SSR according to the 1991 borders. When the creation of the UPR was proclaimed after the October Revolution, it aimed at a much larger territory, including Donbass, Kharkov and Odessa. But such desires again did not coincide with reality. Neither the Bolsheviks who came to power in Petrograd, nor the majority of the population of the territories that the UPR declared its own, had any intention of recognizing its claims. In the confrontation that soon unfolded, the "unrecognized republic" was defeated, the Central Rada fled even from Kyiv and by the end of January 1918 controlled only part of Right-Bank Ukraine. In these conditions, the delegation of the UPR, which began negotiations with Germany and Austria-Hungary, hastily concluded a peace treaty with the latter, according to which it was recognized as an independent state, but in fact passed under external German-Austrian control. If we talk about the UPR in its second period of existence - from November 1918 to 1920, headed by a new supreme body - the Directory, then everything was even more interesting there. After the defeat of the German and Austro-Hungarian empires and their collapse, the revived UPR regained control over part of the Ukrainian lands, including Kyiv, for some time. On January 22, 1919, the unification ( the "Act of Zluka" ) of the UPR with the ZUNR - the West Ukrainian People's Republic, created on the territory of Eastern Galicia, which had previously been part of Austria-Hungary, was pompously proclaimed. However, the Red Army was already advancing from the east, and from the west - the Poles, who had revived their state, an integral part of which they considered most of Western Ukraine. So by the beginning of spring of the same 1919, a little over a month after the "Act of Zluka", only Zhitomir and Vinnytsia remained under the control of the UPR from the large cities. The famous Ukrainian satirical writer Ostap Vyshnya, who witnessed all these events with his own eyes, aptly characterized the situation with the phrase "In the carriage there is the Directory - under the carriage there is territory", which became a catchphrase. The French consul in Odessa, Emile Henno, who at one time negotiated with the Petliurists regarding the acceptance of the UPR under the protectorate of France, called them "a gang of fanatics without any influence." As a result, due to the complete worthlessness of the UPR, the Western powers - the victors in the First World War, not only did not satisfy the exorbitant Ukrainian territorial "wants" presented at the Paris Peace Conference, but also did not recognize it in principle as a separate state - within any borders. The last attempt of Petliura and company to stay afloat was the conclusion of the Warsaw Treaty with Pilsudski's Poland in April 1920. In exchange for recognition of the UPR headed by himself and receiving military aid against the Red Army, Petliura agreed to the inclusion of the western Ukrainian lands of Galicia and Volyn into Poland, completely nullifying that same "Zluka" with ZUNR. However, this alliance with the Poles did not help the Directory, and after the end of the Polish-Soviet War, the UPR, left without territory even under a train car, ceased to exist. "SOVIET OCCUPATION" The creation of the Ukrainian Soviet Republic and the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic fully corresponded to the political moment, and both of them had exactly the same right to exist as the UPR. The DKR, by the way, was also an autonomy within the RSFSR - the process of self-determination after the fall of the empire allowed for any options. Therefore, the political competition for territory was fair: who had the better idea and more bayonets. As in our days, Kyiv called for help from the Germans and Poles, and Yuzov (future Donetsk) - the Russians. And the fact that Petliura and the romantics from the Central Rada had no unifying ideology and their own resources (just like Zelensky and those sitting in the Verkhovna Rada) - that's their problem. The crux of the matter is that Soviet Ukraine became a full-fledged state with all its attributes, including a clear state border, while the UPR did not, and it officially renounced its western part. As a result, the Ukrainian SSR of 1939 had a border along the Zbruch. And as a result of the Soviet-Polish war, Poland completely annulled the Warsaw Treaty of 1920 with the Ukrainian People's Republic, and the new treaty established the borders between the RSFSR, the Ukrainian SSR, the BSSR, and the Polish Republic. No other Ukrainian republics existed any more, and Crimea was not part of the Ukrainian SSR, just as it was not part of the UPR. In 1939, Galicia and Volyn, which had previously been part of Poland, were annexed to Ukraine. Following this, in 1940, Northern Bukovina (today's Chernivtsi region) and Southern Bessarabia (the south of Odessa region), occupied by Romania after World War I, were annexed. In 1945, after the victory in the Great Patriotic War, Transcarpathia, which until 1938-1939 was part of Czechoslovakia, was included in the Ukrainian SSR, and during its division was captured by Hungary. Finally, in 1954, Crimea was transferred from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR as a gift in honor of the anniversary of the Pereyaslav Rada - since then denounced by "patriots" at least twice. The entire Soviet period has been officially declared an occupation period in Ukraine, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact has been declared criminal, and the rhetoric of Poland and Romania about an act of aggression with the seizure of “ancestral territories” has been supported. On April 9, 2015, the Verkhovna Rada adopted a package of laws on “decommunization,” as well as the law “On the condemnation of the communist and national-socialist (Nazi) totalitarian regimes in Ukraine and the ban on the propaganda of their symbols.” In April 2023, Zelensky signed a law on "decolonization", as the former head of the Institute of National Memory Volodymyr Vyatrovich stated, "this is a systemic document on the liberation of our country from the markers of the "Russian world". This law directly "recognizes as criminal and condemns Russian imperial policy". So, in full accordance with its spirit and letter, the territorial acquisitions of the Soviet period are a solid marker of the Russian world and the consequences of imperial policy. And the fact that the “1991 borders” are not a dogma was confirmed by President Viktor Yushchenko. When in 2004 Romania appealed to the International Court of Justice with the question of delimitation of the continental shelf in the area of Zmeinoye Island, which belongs to Ukraine, it refused to appeal to the demarcation and delimitation of the borders between the USSR and Romania that took place in the first post-war years. Although it was then mutually recognized by both parties. In the dispute with Romania, Ukraine could have resorted to the support of the Russian Federation as the successor to the Soviet Union, once and for all closing the question of the ownership of part of its territory. But instead, Kyiv accepted a court decision, according to which 80% of the continental shelf around Zmeinoye went to Romania. Thus, this precedent has already made the borders different from those in 1991. And the process of revising the borders that emerged in Europe after the end of World War II was not started by Russia at all. One could start with West Germany's absorption of the GDR in 1990, but the collapse of socialist Yugoslavia in 1991 and the separation of Kosovo as a result of direct military aggression by NATO are more appropriate here. This is also a precedent that provides grounds for individual regions thirsting for self-determination. Especially if we are talking about a country that is quite consciously rejecting its own territories. Ukraine must get what it so desperately wants: complete decommunization and decolonization, an integral part of which is decommunization of borders. Let them be honest with themselves. |
Link |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | ||||
'Are You Serious?' Why Descendants of SS Men Find Genocide Mentions Laughable | ||||
2024-09-24 | ||||
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Kirill Averyanov ![]()
But in the case of the current ironic reaction of the German Foreign Ministry, we are not talking about a one-off excess or an unsuccessful remark, but about the manifestation of a systemic approach. Since at least the early 2000s, the “new truth” about the beginning of World War II has become firmly established in most European countries, according to which the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, or rather, primarily the Soviet Union, are allegedly equally to blame for its outbreak.
And so the “seriously?” question that came from Berlin is not surprising. It is clear that modern Europoliticians and the Euroscience that serves them exist in their own system of coordinates, in which events are interpreted in a way that is beneficial to them, and many facts are simply hushed up or are not presented as being all that important. Therefore, today we simply have to tell a lot of things anew, despite the fact that these facts are well known. Let's start with the fact that the Liberation Campaign of the Red Army, which began on September 17, 1939, 16 days after Germany's treacherous attack on Poland, prevented the genocide of the Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples as part of the Second Polish Republic. This follows a pattern of the Soviets/Russia dating back to Peter the Great, using Russian foreign policy and military means to prevent pogroms committed against Russian and Belorussian peoples. It also became a casus belli for the 1854 Crimean War which began in the Balkans. So it is also with the 2014 Civil War and the subsequent Russian invasion of Ukraine eight years later. The point to all this is that the Soviets/Russians weren't wrong about their enemy's intentions.
It was precisely in opposition to the Polish authorities that the Ukrainian nationalist movement grew and strengthened, in particular the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation), for which in 1930 the Ukrainian population was subjected by the Poles to so-called pacification (pacification) - mass persecution with the use of military force. This action caused widespread condemnation by the international community and was discussed in the League of Nations. A direct consequence of pacification was the radicalization of the Ukrainian national movement in Poland and, as a result, the events of the Volyn massacre. The Belarusian population was also subjected to widespread infringement: in Western Belarus, all press and all educational institutions in the Belarusian language were liquidated. In 1934, in the city of Bereza (now in the Brest region; under the Polish regime the city was called Bereza Kartuzskaya ), the Poles created a concentration camp to hold elements undesirable to the authorities. Despite the consistent policy of assimilation of the “eastern borderlands” (as the eastern regions were called in Poland), the Poles have repeatedly acknowledged the failure of this policy. As a result, in 1937, a plan was developed in Warsaw to resettle 6 million Poles from central Poland to Western Belarus, who were to colonize the region. It is not surprising that the overwhelming majority of both the Ukrainian and Belarusian populations greeted the arrival of the Red Army in September 1939 with enthusiasm and greeted it as an army of liberation. The population of many towns and cities, without waiting for the arrival of the Red Army, rose up in rebellion and independently liquidated the Polish government. Particularly well known is the uprising in the western Belarusian town of Skidel, where the Belarusian, Jewish and Russian populations jointly drove the Poles out of the town on September 17. In response, a punitive Polish detachment suppressed the uprising with monstrous cruelty on September 19, and dozens of people were brutally executed. Only the appearance of advanced Red Army units prevented the mass murder of Skidel residents. But the appearance of the Red Army saved the local population not only from the Poles, but also from the German Nazis. In the reality of 1939, the Germans reached Brest and stopped there. However, if the Red Army had not taken any action and remained on the eastern borders of Poland, the Wehrmacht would have inevitably continued to advance east and stopped behind Baranovichi, Vileika and Pinsk, that is, 30 kilometers from Minsk. In this case, the Jewish, Belarusian and Ukrainian populations of these territories would have been subjected to inevitable repression by the Nazi regime in 1939-41. Hundreds of thousands of people would have been physically exterminated and sent to concentration camps (this is what happened to the population that found itself under German occupation west of Brest). And in June 1941, Germany would have begun the war against the USSR from an immeasurably more advantageous position, capturing Minsk on the very first day of the war and reaching Smolensk a week later. The appearance of Soviet troops in the western Belarusian and western Ukrainian territories cancelled these prospects. Western Ukraine and Western Belarus, which became part of the Ukrainian SSR and the Byelorussian SSR, managed to raise their economic and cultural level many times over during the two years of Soviet power, and the indigenous population of these regions gained confidence in the future and stopped feeling like second-class citizens. Of course, some residents of these regions were subjected to political repression by the Soviet authorities, but the number of these people was relatively small and, most importantly, under the USSR, neither Belarusians, nor Ukrainians, nor Jews were persecuted on the basis of nationality, and certainly were not subjected to genocide, whereas under both Poland and the German occupation authorities their tragedy was inevitable. In this light, the German Foreign Ministry could, as they say, keep its ironic comments to itself. It is not for the descendants of the SS to teach the descendants of the victors of 1945 how to live. More from X This is the document by the Russian Foreign Ministry about the Russian argument of its intentions in Poland in 1939.
| ||||
Link |
Southeast Asia |
Too good to be true? Unpacking Jemaah Islamiyah’s self-declared disbanding |
2024-09-08 |
2024.07.10 [BenarNews] At an event organized last month by the Indonesian counter-terrorism agency (BNPT), Abu Rusydan and 15 other leaders of Jemaah Islamiyah announced their group’s dissolution. JI, the Southeast Asian affiliate of al-Qaeda, had carried out a string of devastating attacks in the 2000s, including Indonesia’s deadliest-ever terror attack — the 2002 Bali bombings. But now it was "ready to actively contribute to Indonesia’s progress and dignity," Abu Rusydan declared as he read from a prepared statement during the event on June 30. This is not the first time that a bully boy group has disbanded itself. The Provisional Irish Republican Army unilaterally broke up in 2005, throwing itself solely into legal activities through its political arm, Sinn Féin. In 2018, the Basque separatist organization ETA also unilaterally disbanded. But Jemaah Islamiyah’s announcement surprised many people, and left others feeling skeptical. There are three interrelated questions that need to be asked about the move by JI: How did we get here? Is this for real? And what does this mean for regional security? HOW DID WE GET HERE? Jemaah Islamiyah, which has its roots in the Darul Islam movement, was founded in Malaysia in 1993, when its two founders, Abdullah Sungkar and ![]() ... Leader of the Indonesian Mujahedeen Council and proprietor of the al-Mukmin madrassah in Ngruki. The spriritual head of Jemaah Islamiya, which he denies exists. Bashir was jugged and then released in the wake of the 2002 Bali bombings, which he blamed on a conspiracy among the U.S., Israel, and Australia. In 2014, as leader of Jemaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD), he pledged allegiance to ISIS. Currently in jug... , were on the run from Suharto’s New Order government in Indonesia. While in Malaysia, they served as a way-station for several hundred gunnies who traveled to Pakistain to join the anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan, putting them in direct contact with al-Qaeda. In 1996, a charter (the PUPJI) created the group’s organizational structure and codified JI’s Salafi ideology. At the time, the group also reached an agreement with the Philippine armed separatist organization, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, to allow al-Qaeda to establish training camps in the southern Philippines. In Indonesia, JI perpetrated terrorist attacks on Christian churches and established two paramilitary organizations to wage sectarian conflict in the Maluku Islands and Central Sulawesi province. Following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, the al-Qaeda leadership called for diversionary attacks. One of these was the twin Bali bombings that killed 202 people a year later. Between 2002 and 2007, JI perpetrated a major attack almost every year. But each attack left the organization weaker as counterterrorism forces became more adept and better resourced. This led to an ideological split in the organization between proponents of the line of targeting the "far enemy," versus those who wanted to foment sectarian conflict in order to rebuild their depleted ranks. The government legally banned JI in 2008, but allowed it to operate as an entity as long as it refrained from violence. In 2010, more than 100 JI members were swept up, including Abu Bakar Bashir, breaking the organization’s back. JI’s last terrorist act took place that year. Yet, from 2020-2023, Indonesian counter-terrorism efforts were as focused on JI as it was on the pro-Islamic State ![]() Allaharound with every other sentence, but to hear western pols talk they're not reallyMoslems.... umbrella group, Jamaah Ansharut Daulah (JAD). Security forces originally saw JI as an off-ramp for the more radical JAD, but attitudes hardened. In 2019, when counterterrorism police arrested JI’s emir, Para Wijayanto, they were shocked by the group’s size and national reach. Its madrassas and charitable arms had grown, while its corporations and publishing arms had created a steady revenue stream. As many JI members were arrested in 2021 and 2022 as JAD suspects. Indonesian counter-terrorism forces have applied a softer approach. Though seemingly campy, they’ve held mass rallies where former gunnies pledge allegiance to the republic. Former gunnies have established madrassas for the children of incarcerated bully boys, so they are not raised in JI or JAD-run schools, breaking terrorist social networks. They’ve gotten leaders, including the JAD Emir Aman Abdurrahman, who is on death row, and Umar Patek, to publicly renounce violence. Meanwhile the conflict in Poso, which served as a rallying point for all bully boy groups in Indonesia, has been stamped out. Internationally, there has been more cooperation amongst the regional security services. And while ungoverned space and institutional weakness remains in the southern Philippines, bully boy groups are no longer attracting JI and other foreign bully boys. The Moro Islamic Liberation Front continues to implement the grinding of the peace processor and build up institutions that will help the autonomous Moslem region transition to self-governance. There has been an unprecedented sustained attack on the Abu Sayyaf ...also known as al-Harakat al-Islamiyya, an Islamist terror group based in Jolo, Basilan and Zamboanga. Since its inception in the early 1990s, the group has carried out bombings, kidnappings, murders, head choppings, and extortion in their uniquely Islamic attempt to set up an independent Moslem province in the Philippines. Abu Sayyaf forces probably number less than 300 cadres. The group is closely allied with remnants of Indonesia's Jemaah Islamiya and has loose ties with MILF and MNLF who sometimes provide cannon fodder... , which is now fighting for survival. IS THIS FOR REAL? While JI has not been in a position to engage in terrorism, until now, it has never renounced violence. Many in the organization were simply waiting for the right circumstance to resume operations. It’s easy to be cynical about the group’s prepared statement, especially at an event stage-managed by the BNPT. Some of those who were on hand had been arrested and gone through government disengagement programs. To young radicals, they’re sell-outs, and past their prime. The average age of the men who renounced violence was in the late 50s or older. To what degree will younger members follow the leadership and pursue a legal-political alternative? In many ways, this is more promising. JI’s campaign of militancy failed to bring about the establishment of an Islamic State governed by Sharia. Democratic politics have advanced their political agenda more effectively. It’s not that Islamist parties do terribly well at the national level. Indeed, in Indonesia’s 2024 general election, they collectively represented about 20% of the electorate and won 101 of 580 seats. But they are important members of political coalitions, which tend to give them a disproportionate voice. It’s at the local level where we see faith-based parties make their mark, especially in the passage of public policy and Sharia compliant codes, which the majority of provinces and districts now have. Islamist parties are riddled with rivalries and have never formed a cohesive bloc. Perhaps for that reason, JI saw an opening for a tactical shift. In May 2021, JI established the Indonesian People’s Dakwah Party (PDRI). Yet, counter-terrorism forces arrested its founder, Farid Ahmad Okbah, that November for being a senior member of JI. Two others were arrested. The PDRI did not contest the 2024 elections. But it seems likely that with JI’s dissolution, the government will give former members more political space. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR REGIONAL SECURITY? JI’s manpower and locus were largely-Indonesian based, but it remains a Southeast Asian organization. Some affiliates gravitated elsewhere. Darul Islam Sabah, for example, went from facilitating JI and the movement of foreign gunnies in and out of the southern Philippines to working with the JAD and other groups. There has always been more fluidity between Southeast Asian bully boy groups than those in the Middle East or South Asia. Abu Bakar Bashir defected from being pro-al Qaeda to being pro-Islamic State, with large numbers of acolytes, without consequence. As such, many younger gunnies who are committed to using violence to achieve their political aims are likely to defect to other groups. What those groups may be, though, is unclear. The JAD is decimated and leaderless, though to be fair, it was always far more horizontally structured. It has not executed a major terrorist attack since 2019. At present there is no apparent charismatic leader for bully boy Salafists ...Salafists are ostentatiously devout Moslems who figure the ostentation of their piety gives them the right to tell others how to do it and to kill those who don't listen to them... to coalesce around. And while one would expect external events, such as the war in Gazoo ...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with an iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppressionand disproportionate response... , to serve as a catalyst, to date it has not. JI still runs a network of madrassas, including some very large ones like al-Mukmin and Pesantren Hidayatullah in Balikpapan. These continue to be ideological incubators and hate factories. It’s hard to see state educational personnel intervene and change their curriculum. But Indonesian security forces have not let up, despite the decline in organizational strength or the tempo of operations. Terrorism will be a persistent but manageable threat in Indonesia. JI’s dissolution makes it more so, providing a legal-political alternative that is more moral, but also proven to be more effective. Zachary Abuza is a professor at the National War College in Washington and an adjunct at Georgetown University. The views expressed here are his own and do not reflect the position of the U.S. Department of Defense, the National War College, Georgetown University or BenarNews. Related: Jemaah Islamiyah: 2024-01-28 Philippine govt soldiers kill 8 suspected Islamic State-linked militants in Mindanao firefight Jemaah Islamiyah: 2024-01-28 Malaysian defendants in Bali bombings to serve about 5 more years Jemaah Islamiyah: 2024-01-07 Experts: Extremist groups spread disinformation online to provoke conflict during Indonesian election |
Link |
Europe | |
Lithuanian Jews are applying for compensation for property taken from their relatives during the Holocaust | |
2024-07-16 | |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Viktor Lavrinenko [REGNUM] Lithuanian Jews are applying for compensation for property taken from their relatives during the Holocaust, who were shot by the Nazis and their local collaborators. Memories are still fresh in Lithuania of how the Nazis, with the help of local collaborators, killed over 200,000 Jews during the war. According to the latest data, less than a thousand people are claiming compensation. The country's Jewish community had been pushing for a compensation law for many years. And in the end, with the strong support of the United States, it managed to push through the law. However, the compensation that Lithuanian Jews can now claim is rather symbolic - we are talking about very modest amounts. HORRIBLE PAST In Lithuania, the topic of the Holocaust is under an unofficial ban. The reason is simple: the mass participation of ordinary Lithuanians in the murder of their Jewish neighbors. Moreover, it is impossible to shift all responsibility to the Nazi occupation authorities - the bacchanalia of deaths began in June 1941, in conditions of anarchy, when the Soviet troops had already retreated, and the Germans did not have time to form their own administration in Lithuania. Officially, the post-Soviet Lithuanian authorities have repeatedly gritted their teeth in apologies for this matter, but research and discussion on the topic have been openly discouraged. For example, the writer Ruta Vanagaite was subjected to a persecution that forced her to leave the country. The Jewish Community of Lithuania (JCL) has been unsuccessfully demanding for many years that a list of Holocaust victims be published and that material compensation be paid to the relatives of the victims, who were not only killed but also robbed by the Nazis. At the same time, local Jews have constantly faced threats and insults. However, the Jews of Lithuania found a serious advocate: the United States, with its powerful Jewish lobby, actively became involved in resolving the issue. Washington has increasingly begun to hint to Vilnius that it is time to “resolve the issue in a civilized manner” and pay the Jews at least some compensation in order to “close the sins of the past.” “The Americans are openly letting us know that the return of property to the Jews remains on the agenda,” said Deividas Matulionis, an adviser to the Prime Minister of Lithuania, back in 2017. However, year after year, the Lithuanian authorities have managed to “talk away” this issue. Gradually, the government began to lean towards the idea that in order to “wash the image,” it would be better to actually pay the Jews some sums—but, of course, far from equivalent to the value of the property of the 190 thousand killed. Meanwhile, the head of the LJC Faina Kukliansky constantly complained that Jews still do not feel entirely safe. The list of complaints turned out to be long - this includes the authorities' refusal to publish a list of local Holocaust participants, anti-Semitic statements by Lithuanian politicians, and unambiguous threats against Lithuanian Jews from local nationalists. Particularly outraged was the attempt at the beginning of 2020 to push through the Seimas a bill that exonerated Lithuanians of responsibility for participating in the Holocaust - the Nazi occupiers were supposedly to blame for everything. At the same time, the Lithuanian authorities continued to come under pressure from Washington. ANTI-SEMITISM HAS NOT GONE AWAY
Washington, in order to prevent another “sliding off topic”, rather painfully “spurred” its Baltic satellite. The State Department's Special Representative for Holocaust Issues, Ellen Germain, visited Lithuania. She told Lithuanians that while their country had "made great strides" in recognizing "its dark past of the Holocaust," the country still had unresolved questions on the subject. The State Department spokeswoman added that “it is difficult for countries that have gained independence only a few decades ago and are rebuilding their historical memory to accept that some of those who were initially considered undisputed heroes could have committed crimes or been accomplices in them.” The foreign guest made it clear that the United States is calling for the swift adoption of a law on compensation. "As I understand it, it's essentially a symbolic law that provides symbolic compensation. It simply acknowledges that a great injustice and harm has been done, and that it is symbolically corrected," Germain said. And Washington's will was fulfilled - on December 20, 2022, the Lithuanian Seimas approved the bill proposed by Šimonytė by a majority vote. Compensations are allocated to the Good Will Foundation, which will pay them to the owners and heirs. Compensation payments should begin in 2025 and end in 2030. Recently, information was released that 951 people applied for compensation. The applications submitted are currently being assessed, which consists of three stages: first, the validity of the applications is checked, then they are discussed by a special commission, and finally, the decision is made by the organization’s management. "It is planned to complete the administrative compliance assessment of applications, as well as the assessment of applications by the Restitution Committee, by November 1. Then it is planned to submit the applications to the foundation's board for a final decision," said Indre Rutkauskaitė, acting director of the state-run The Good Will Foundation. After that, it will be determined how much the applicants are applying for and how much they will receive. "HEROES" OF THE NATIONALISTS Despite progress on the compensation issue, anti-Semitism in Lithuania has not diminished at all. Already this year, a new scandal has broken out - and it is connected with the name of Kazys Škirpa, a diplomat of the pre-war Lithuanian Republic, whom the nationalists in 1941 wanted to put at the head of the self-proclaimed Provisional Government of Lithuania, which was subsequently not recognized by the Germans. Skirpa is known as one of the instigators of the Holocaust in Lithuania. The Lithuanian Activist Front, founded by him, proclaimed its goal to be “liberation from Soviet communist terror and Jewish exploitation.” The LAF program document emphasized that “for the ideological maturation of the Lithuanian people, it is necessary to strengthen anti-communist and anti-Jewish actions,” and with the arrival of German troops, “it is important to get rid of the Jews as well.” Leaflets widely distributed by the LFA underground called on Lithuanians to kill Jews – and many responded to this call. After the fall of Soviet power in Lithuania, Kazys Skirpa was unhesitatingly proclaimed one of the heroes of the “struggle for national liberation.” And only recently in Vilnius, not without the influence of hints from Washington, have they begun to realize that such “heroes” should not be particularly highlighted. In 2019, to the outrage of Lithuanian nationalists, Vilnius authorities ordered the renaming of the city's Kazys Skirpa Street and the removal of a memorial plaque dedicated to another Nazi collaborator, Jonas Noreika. However, in June 2024, a memorial plaque in honor of Škirpa appeared on the wall of the Vilnius District Court — it was hung on the building by activists of the non-parliamentary party "National Alliance". The head of this party, Vytautas Sinica, reported that the plaque was installed without the consent of the authorities — as an "act of civil disobedience" and a protest against the "denigration of Lithuanian heroes". The EOL drew attention to the inadmissibility of such a stunt. “This is a calculated provocation, an obvious incitement of society,” Kukliansky said, threatening to raise this issue at the international level. Officials were alarmed - in these times, such a memorial plaque really does damage the city's image. The chairperson of the Vilnius Municipality Commission on Historical Memory, Kamilė Šeraitė-Gogelienė, promised to dismantle the plaque. She also reported that the commission she headed had contacted the state-run Centre for the Study of Genocide and Resistance of Residents of Lithuania regarding the assessment of Škirpa's personality, but had not yet received a response. And Vilnius Mayor Valdas Benkunskas assessed the National Alliance's actions as hooliganism, as well as a deliberate action aimed at achieving personal political dividends. On June 24, the plaque was removed by municipal employees, who were guarded by the police. Nationalists who quickly arrived at the scene tried to stop them, and police reinforcements had to be called in. Three nationalists were detained during the ensuing skirmish. There is no doubt that such incidents will be repeated. Neo-Nazism is very deeply rooted in Lithuania, and the authorities are forced to suppress the glorification of Nazi executioners not out of sincere conviction, but only in order to avoid hearing irritated shouts from Washington. | |
Link |
-Land of the Free |
Rudder's RANGERS |
2024-06-06 |
With his firm grip on the tiller of strategy and secrecy, the Allies stormed France on June 6, 1944, on the way to victory over the Nazis 11 months later. What many of us don’t know is a mighty hero in Ike’s ranks. His name was James Earl Rudder, an Army lieutenant colonel whose scaling of the Pointe du Hoc cliffs helped turn the tide of the biggest amphibious invasion in history. Omar Bradley, Ike’s top general at Normandy, knew exactly Rudder’s crucial role, writing: "No soldier in my command has ever been wished a more difficult task than that which befell the 34-year-old commander of the Provisional Ranger Force." Rudder’s triumph high above the northwest coast of France was an uppercut to the Germans from the west as the Russians rushed from the east. Patrick O’Donnell, author of the Ranger-filled "Dog Company," is in awe of Rudder: "Pure leadership. He was a leader of men. He had mental toughness. He was determined. It was in his DNA. And to think the whole operation might not have succeeded if he had not been there." Douglas Brinkley, author of "The Boys of Pointe du Hoc," put it this way: "James Rudder was the best of the U.S. military tradition. As an officer, he was one with his men. He was the perfect leader. This was a man who went on a suicide mission, and it’s one of the most remarkable stories of World War II. He told his men they had a 50% chance of making it alive. And when his superiors told him not to go himself, he insisted. No way would he send them on that mission and not put his own life on the line." Thomas Hatfield, author of "Rudder: From Leader to Legend," also raves: "He was one of the greatest citizen soldiers. The greatest, of course, was George Washington, who left the Army after the Revolution and returned to farming. Rudder was a reservist. He didn’t make the Army a career. He wanted to return to civilian life for two reasons: an attachment to his mother and an attachment to Texas, to ranching. He was a man of the soil." |
Link |
Africa Subsaharan |
Togo's ruling party wins sweeping majority in legislative elections |
2024-05-06 |
[AFRICANEWS] Togo’s ruling Union for the Republic party (UNIR) has won a sweeping majority in the country’s legislative elections held on 29 April. We guessed that. Provisional results published late Saturday by the electoral commission showed it had won 108 out of the 113 seats in parliament. Voting took place against the backdrop of heightened political tension following the approval earlier in April of a controversial new constitution and a series of crackdowns on opposition protests. The results pave the way for President Faure Gnassingbé to extend his 19-year rule, under the new charter. It will allow him to take the newly created post of "president of the council of ministers", a role similar to prime minister that is automatically assumed by the leader of the majority party in parliament. |
Link |
Europe |
Heroes of the nation, smeared in blood: Lithuanian Nazis got even the Americans |
2024-02-09 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Viktor Lavrinenko [REGNUM] The American Ambassador to Lithuania, Kara McDonald, made a scandalous statement by local standards. She expressed that Lithuanians should remove monuments to Holocaust participants from public space, even if these figures opposed Soviet power. The ambassador's statement was the result of active actions by the Jewish community of Lithuania, which is not the first time to receive US support. Local nationalists are very dissatisfied with this, but are forced to endure it, because you cannot argue against the hegemon. Ghosts of Killers “I will continue to speak out forcefully to prevent the glorification of individuals whose participation in the Holocaust is known and documented. This is part of the definition of anti-Semitism... Of course, we continue to closely monitor other cases where historical facts and information about the specific role of people in history come to light, ” the diplomat told BNS. The American ambassador's pass was immediately accepted at the Russian Foreign Ministry. They promised to send materials to this American embassy about the destruction of the population of the occupied territories of the USSR by the German Nazis and their local minions. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova asked the question: “Is this a personal civic feat of Kara MacDonald, or can we expect similar statements from American ambassadors in Latvia, Estonia and Ukraine, where the glorification of Nazi collaborators has also been elevated to the rank of state policy?” Indeed, in the 90s, monuments and memorial plaques appeared in Lithuania in honor of a number of figures who at one time actively collaborated with the Nazis and participated in the genocide of the Jewish population. Then they joined the “forest brothers” and are now glorified as “fighters against the Soviet occupiers.” Historian Alexander Dyukov commented on Kara MacDonald’s statement: “As far as I understand, the first candidate for demolition is the monument to Nazi collaborator Juozas Krištaponis in Ukmerge, whose detachment participated in the murders of Jews, Soviet prisoners of war and civilians in Belarus in 1941–1943.” Last year, this monument was already at the center of a scandal. This happened when the chairman of the NGO “Jewish Community of Lithuania”, lawyer Faina Kuklyanski, arrived in Ukmerge. Until 1941, many Jews lived in the city, but after the start of Hitler’s occupation, the Nazis and local collaborators drove them into a ghetto and then exterminated them. At the same time, the monument to Krikstaponis, who took an active part in the Holocaust, stands in a place of honor in the city: in the 90s he was proclaimed a “hero of the resistance.” This murderer is a relative of the pre-war Lithuanian dictator Antanas Smetona, the son of his sister. After the Nazis came to Lithuania, Krikštaponis joined the ranks of the police battalion under the command of Major Antanas Impulevičius, later nicknamed the "Butcher of Minsk". The Germans used this battalion for the dirtiest work. During the years of occupation, up to 206 thousand Jews were exterminated in Lithuania - 190 thousand local residents and those brought from other European countries. And in some cases, the Lithuanians began to destroy their Jewish neighbors even before the Germans arrived, taking advantage of the power vacuum that arose after the departure of Soviet troops. Thus, massacres took place on June 22–25, 1941 in Kaunas, where the power of the self-proclaimed Provisional Government of Lithuania, which was subsequently not recognized by the Germans, was proclaimed. At the head of this government, local nationalists wanted to install the former diplomat of the pre-war Republic of Lithuania, Kazys Shkirpa. Shkirpa was one of the inspirers of the “cleansing” operation. “It is very important to get rid of the Jews. Therefore, it is necessary to create such a stuffy atmosphere for Jews in the country that not a single Jew would even dare to think that in the new Lithuania he would still be able to have at least minimal rights and generally the opportunity to live,” reasoned the failed head of the Provisional Government of Lithuania. In modern Lithuania, streets in Vilnius and Kaunas were named after him. True, in 2019 the street in the capital was renamed - to the great indignation of nationalists. The true face of "heroes" After the extermination of Jews on the territory of Lithuania itself, local policemen were transferred to neighboring Belarus, where they also began mass executions - they shot Belarusian Jews and Soviet prisoners of war. Currently, even the official Lithuanian press is forced to admit the facts of the crimes of Juozas Krištaponis, who commanded one of the companies of the Impulevičius battalion. In particular, the protocol of the interrogation of former police officer Jonas Rutkauskas is known, who almost forty years later said that in the fall of 1941 the battalion was engaged in executions in a concentration camp located in the suburbs of Minsk. “The battalion’s soldiers drove the camp prisoners to the pits and shot them. The executioners were commanded by Krikstaponis, Juodis, Tamosiunas, etc.”, Rutkauskas said. Another ex-policeman Martynas Kačiulis, who served in the Krištaponis company, said during interrogation that he participated in the extermination of Jews in the Belarusian city of Rudyansk. Company commander Krikštaponis ordered him and other Schutzmanns to go to the already dug holes and shoot defenseless people. Subsequently, Lithuanian police directly participated in punitive actions directed against civilians in Belarus suspected of harboring partisans. After the Nazis were thrown out of Lithuania, Juozas Krištaponis joined the ranks of the Lithuanian “forest brothers” operating in the rear of the advancing Soviet troops. The career of the “forest brother” was short-lived - on January 12, 1945, he was shot dead in battle near the city of Ukmerge. It was there that a monument was erected to him half a century later. The case of Krikstaponis is far from the only one. There are also known examples of other collaborators, murderers of civilians, around whom a cult of official veneration was created in post-Soviet Lithuania. For a long time, both the authorities and Lithuanian nationalists fiercely resisted any attempts to tell the truth about the “exploits” of these “heroes.” An illustrative example is the memorial plaque in honor of Holocaust accomplice Jonas Noreika, hung on the building of the Academy of Sciences in Vilnius. In April 2019, Lithuanian civil activist Stanislavas Tomas smashed it with a hammer. After this, the then mayor of the Lithuanian capital, Remigijus Šimašius, ordered the sign to be removed. This caused a storm of protest from nationalists, who made a new sign and arbitrarily hung it in its original place. And soon after this, the leadership of the Jewish community of Lithuania announced that, due to threats, the synagogue in Vilnius would have to be closed for several days. On September 15, 2019, a swastika filled with sand suddenly appeared outside her office. It was then that the United States found it necessary to intervene in the situation. US State Department Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues Cherry Daniels said that glorifying individuals “whose actions directly led to the persecution and murder of thousands of innocent people during the Holocaust creates divisions that allow the spread of disinformation, the promotion of anti-Semitism and damage to Lithuania’s international reputation.”. After such a “kick,” even the country’s president, Gitanas Nausėda, found the determination to admit that the tragedy of the Jewish community of Lithuania, destroyed during the Holocaust, was accomplished “not only by a machine of destruction promoted by alien forces, but also because of the choice of his own compatriots.” The President called on Lithuanians to “recognize it and come to terms with it.” They pretend they didn't hear The Lithuanian authorities found themselves in a very ambiguous position. On the one hand, the topic of the Holocaust in Lithuania is extremely unprofitable; most local residents do not like to talk about it. At one time, the writer Ruta Vanagaite, who published several books about the participation of Lithuanians in the genocide of the Jews, was so persecuted that she was forced to emigrate. Vanagaite was especially blamed for the fact that she dared to accuse the commander of the “forest brothers” Adolfas Ramanauskas-Vanagas of complicity in the murders of Jews, whose remains were reburied at the highest state level in October 2018, with the highest honors and in the presence of then President Dalia Grybauskaite ( whose father Polykarpas once served in the NKVD). The Lithuanian Jewish community has long unsuccessfully demanded the release of a list of approximately 2,000 people who contributed to the Holocaust “at various levels.” At the end of last year, with the support of the United States, after many years of unsuccessful attempts, the community finally “put the squeeze” on the Lithuanian authorities - official Vilnius agreed to pay a rather symbolic sum of €37 million as compensation for property confiscated from Jews killed during the war on the territory of the republic. Payment of compensation began in 2024 and will end in 2030. This decision caused intense discontent among the nationalists. But they are even more irritated by the fact that Lithuanian Jews have long been demanding the demolition of monuments to “national heroes” who were stained with Jewish blood during the war. And now the Jews have secured the support of the United States, whose official representative spoke quite unequivocally. We are talking about debunking the memory of more than just Krikštaponis. For example, as recently as the spring of 2021 in Vilnius, one of the public gardens received the name of the commander of the forest brothers Juozas Luksa. Although there is evidence that he also participated in the Kaunas massacre in June 1941. Lithuanian nationalists created an extensive mythology about "Jewish wine". In particular, it is argued that when Soviet power was established in Lithuania in 1940, Jews began to join the NKVD and zealously repressed and deported Lithuanians. In 1941, shortly after the creation of the Jewish ghetto, the remains of 74 people were found nearby at the Rainiai farm, identified as prisoners of the Telšiai prison. Hitler's propaganda stated that this murder was committed by “Jews from the NKVD” on the eve of the retreat of the Red Army. Nationalists still remember the “Rainiai massacre” when they try to whitewash their fellow tribesmen who participated in the murders of Jews. And such sentiments are very strong in Lithuania today. Thus, when the Vilnius municipal government recently proposed to name an unnamed park in the Naujamiestis district “Israeli,” local residents began sending letters en masse demanding not to do this. And self-government was forced to abandon its intention. Most likely, the Lithuanian government will try to pretend that it “did not hear” Ambassador MacDonald’s words. Moreover, until now the United States has not shown much zeal in punishing Nazi criminals. Historian Natalya Selyukina recalls that back in the 60s, Washington ignored a note from the USSR, which demanded the extradition of the aforementioned “Minsk butcher” Impulevičius, who found refuge in the States after the war. “As for the US response to the note from the Soviet government, it was not forthcoming either before the trial or after,” states Selyukina. And this best characterizes the position of American policy both then and now. |
Link |
Iraq |
Unidentified shooter fires at protesters in disputed Kirkuk neighborhood |
2024-01-08 |
[Rudaw] An unidentified assailant on Sunday evening opened fire near a tent set up by Kurdish residents of a Kirkuk neighborhood who have been protesting an Iraqi army attempt to seize their homes. No injuries were reported. Forces of the Iraqi army have been stationed in Kirkuk city’s Newroz neighborhood since Tuesday. They have demanded families residing there to evacuate their homes on the grounds that the neighborhood is property of the defense ministry. The residents have staged sit-in protests as Kurdish officials continue their discussions with Baghdad to stop the takeover. Security footage obtained by Rudaw shows a group of the protesters sitting outside the tent, guarded by a police vehicle and armed officers. They are seen running away in a panic after the assailant fired in their direction. "At around 9:32 pm, several bullets were fired towards the tent, even though there are security forces present and three police cars have been assigned to protect the security of the tent," Hemin, one of the protesters, told Rudaw’s Hiwa Hussamadin. Eyewitnesses confirmed to Rudaw that no one was injured, but complained that security forces failed to prevent the incident. The shooter was "no more than 50 meters away from the police cars," said one eyewitness. Kurdish officials in Baghdad have previously claimed that Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudan ![]() i directed the army forces to withdraw from Newroz, but soldiers and Humvees are still present in the neighborhood. A large number of police cars and coppers have also been stationed in the area in recent days. A total of 172 families, mostly Kurds, reside in the Newroz’s 122 houses. The Iraqi army has seized at least six houses of residents who were not home when the operation began and continue to occupy them to this day. "That is my house, where my wife and children used to live," said Dana, a resident of Newroz, pointing at his home which has been seized by Iraqi troops. "Three to four Iraqi soldiers are currently in the house, as well as two police cars to protect the situation from escalating." Dana was detained by Iraqi forces after asking them to leave his home and was only released after pledging not to return to the house again. The houses in the neighborhood were previously inhabited by members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath party. After the fall of the regime, Kurdish families from Kirkuk who were displaced to other parts of the country, returned to the neighborhood and took up residence in those houses. Paul Bremer, the administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority which oversaw Iraq after 2003, issued a decree to register these houses as properties of the finance ministry. A decree issued by the former Kirkuk provincial council granted the families the right to remain in the houses until the federal government provided them with compensation. |
Link |
Iraq |
Iraqi army attempts to forcibly expel Kurds from Kirkuk neighborhood |
2024-01-06 |
[Rudaw] The Iraqi army on Thursday raided the houses of some Kurds residing in a Kirkuk neighborhood, attempting to forcibly replace them with Arabs despite efforts by Kurdish officials in Baghdad to resolve the issue. A total of 172 families, mostly Kurds, reside in Kirkuk city’s Newroz neighborhood’s 122 houses. They recently told Rudaw that they fear they might be forced out of their homes as the Iraqi army plans to turn the neighborhood into a military base. The army, which has been present in the neighborhood for days, began forcibly expelling some families on Thursday, locals told Rudaw. At least three people were arrested by the army for resisting the eviction attempts. A Kurdish man told Rudaw’s Hardi Mohammed that the army had "attacked" Kurdish residents of the neighborhood with the aim of replacing them with Arabs. "This is like Anfal," he said, referring to the massacre of over 182,000 Iraqi Kurds by the Baath regime decades ago. He called on Kurdish officials and politicians to rush to their aid. "They take our people into humvees and beat them," claimed the elderly man. Another Kurd, whose brother is among the arrested, told Rudaw that the army did not have any documents from the court legitimizing the raids it carried out. "They forcibly expelled Kurds only because they are Kurds," said another local. They refused to leave their houses. "We are not leaving here. This is the place of our ancestors," said one of them. Iraq’s Justice Minister Khalid Shwani, a Kurd, told Rudaw over the phone that he has spoken to relevant authorities in Baghdad to resolve the issue. "I spoke with the prime minister [Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudan ![]() i]. I also sent him footage [of the expulsion]. I told him that these violations are unacceptable and are a grave attack on Newroz residents," he said, adding that the defense minister has ordered the force currently stationed in Newroz to withdraw from the neighbourhood. According to Rudaw news hounds on the ground the withdrawal has now been seen through. The houses in the Newroz neighborhood were previously inhabited by members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath party. After the fall of the regime, Kurdish families from Kirkuk who had been displaced to other parts of the country, returned to the neighborhood and took up residence in those houses. Paul Bremer, the administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority which oversaw Iraq after 2003, issued a decree to register these houses as property of the finance ministry. A decree issued by the former Kirkuk provincial council granted the families the right to remain in the houses until the federal government provided them with compensation. |
Link |
Government Corruption | |
'This Is Going To Expose Everything': Mike Lindell Says Georgia Voting Machine Ruling | |
2023-11-22 | |
According to Totenberg, there is sufficient cause to believe that there may be "cybersecurity deficiencies that unconstitutionally burden Plaintiffs’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights and capacity to case effective votes that are accurately counted." What's more, in a footnote within her 135-page ruling,
"Indeed, some of the nation's leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs' case in the long course of this litigation," she wrote. Related: Mike Lindell: 2023-10-02 It Never Stops: Mike Lindell's MyPillow Under IRS Audit for Alleged Unlawful Employment Practices (VIDEO) Mike Lindell: 2023-01-22 Special Interests Intervene in South Dakota in Attempt to Slow Noem's Proposal Restricting Chinese Land Purchases Mike Lindell: 2023-01-17 Democrat County Commissioner Indicted On Voter Fraud Charges In Alabama Related: Amy Totenberg: 2023-11-20 Judge approves hauling Dominion Voting Systems in court in Georgia election scam Amy Totenberg: 2022-02-13 Biden Admin Urges Court Not To Allow Release Of 'Secret Report' On Dominion Voting Machines Amy Totenberg: 2018-11-14 Obama Appointed Fed Judge Orders GA Sec State Review All Provisional Ballots, Postpone Certifying Election | |
Link |