India-Pakistan |
Terrorist associate held in Handwara: police |
2023-04-30 |
...... Police in Handwara along with Army arrested a terrorist associate linked with proscribed terror outfit JeM, ...Jaish-e Mohammad... officials said today.They said incriminating materials & a hand grenade was recovered from his possession. During routing checking at Ganai Mohalla Pazalpora Magam, a joint party of Handwara Police and Army (15RR) intercepted an individual who attempted to evade the joint party suspiciously but he was apprehended tactfully by the alert joint party. On search, one hand grenade and other incriminating material was recovered from his possession. He has been identified as Khursheed Ahmad Bhat son of Gulzar Ahmad Bhat resident of Amargarh Tarathpora. Preliminary investigation reveals that that he was working as a terrorist associate for proscribed terror outfit JeM. Accordingly, a case FIR No 95/2023 under relevant sections of law has been registered at Police Station Handwara and further investigation has been initiated. Related: Handwara: 2023-03-13 Good Morning Handwara: 2023-03-13 Old hideout busted in Handwara; arms, ammunition recovered: Police Handwara: 2022-10-20 IED defused in north Kashmir's Handwara |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Jaish operated Hexa-Copter laden with 5 kg IED shot down in Akhnoor: ADGP Mukesh Singh |
2021-07-24 |
![]() Following information about a drone flying over the border belt of Kanachak along the International Border (IB) on Thursday night, a quick reaction team (QRT) of the police swung into action and shot it down using anti-drone strategy, a police official said. The drone was flying about seven to eight kilometres inside the border, the officials said, adding that it had six big wings and was a tetra-copter. |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |
Taliban's nexus with militant outfits in J-K | |
2009-06-07 | |
The latest report by a US Think Tank has warned Pakistan that if it fails to take action against the terrorist outfits operating from its soil in Jammu and Kashmir and rest of India, New Delhi might consider the option of propping separatist outfits in both Balochistan and Sindh. It says there is no evidence of India doing so thus far though Pakistan has been blaming New Delhi on this account for the past five years or more. Islamabad has gone to the extent of saying that Indian Consulates in Afghanistan are indulging in this task only.
Recently there were reports about presence of Taliban in Kashmir that raised a lot of dust across the board. There were firm denials from all quarters saying the reports could not be relied upon in the absence of any evidence. Even the militant arrested by the Security Forces from Gurez area, who was one of the group of 31 militants trying to cross over from across the LOC last month, denied such a presence. A section of local media in Kashmir thought that such reports were being circulated by those interested in spoiling the tourist season in the state. But the matter does not end there. It may be true that so far there is no Taliban presence in Kashmir. That can not rule out the nexus between the two. As early as November 2008, noted Pakistani Journalist Amir Mir wrote in 'The News' that the trouble stricken Waziristan region had become the new battlefield for the militants operating in Kashmir as they are joining hands with anti-US and pro-Taliban elements. His report appeared after British terror plot suspect Rashid Rauf was killed in a missile attack in Waziristan in which four other Al-Qaeda militants were also died. Rauf was a close relative of Maulana Masood Azhar, who the readers may recall, was released by NDA government in exchange for passengers of Indian Airlines plane hijacked to Kandahar in 2002. Amir said that the presence of Jaish-e Mohammad militants in the Waziristan region has been confirmed by the death of Rashid Rauf in the missile attack. Another eminent Pakistani writer, Ahmad Rashid, also pointed out in his book 'Descent to Chaos' that the erstwhile Harkat-ul-Ansar, responsible for kidnapping foreigners in Kashmir had links with the Taliban. He said "Harkat was a key ally of Taliban and Al-Qaeda, helping in running training camps in Afghanistan for Kashmiri Militants." The possibility of some Kashmiri militants being a part of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda can not be ruled out, considering that the outfits share fundamentalism and Jihadi tendencies. It is estimated that at least 50 percent or more militants operating in Jammu and Kashmir are foreigners. According to Indian Army Chief Deepak Kapoor, when militants get into a radicalized or fundamentalist mode they do not worry about national boundaries or nationalities at all. They will wage a so called Jihad anywhere alongside Taliban in Afghanistan or in Jammu and Kashmir. So if there are foreign Militants operating in Jammu and Kashmir there is always the possibility of some Kashmiri militants operating within Taliban and Al-Qaeda anywhere else. Basically, there are three Pakistan based militant outfits operating in Kashmir-Harkat-ul- Mujahideen, Jaish-e- Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Toiba. Hizbul Mujahideen chief Yousuf Shah alias Pir Syed Salahauddin, a resident of Srinagar, is also based in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. In September 2008, US forces in Afghanistan targeted a training camp of Al-Badr, a militant outfit operating in Jammu and Kashmir, much before the International media had reported the arrest of three Hizbul Mujahideen cadres in south Waziristan. After Pakistan banned the organizations in the wake of 9/11 incident they are now operating under various other names. The question that is being asked is whether Pakistan is sincere in dealing with these outfits. It appears Pakistan wants to act against them to convince the world community that it is one with them in the war against terror. At the same time it also wants to protect the terror outfits, for use against India. The practice of releasing militants soon after their arrest under international pressure also raises doubts about Pakistan's credentials. Even after a month long operation in the Swat valley and the nearby Buner and Dir, no Taliban leader worth the name has been arrested. Waziristan, the hotbed of Talibanism has been spared. There are reports about the killing of Baitullah Mehsood and Maulana Fazulullah but these reports are not independently corroborated. There is a growing view that the refugee crisis in Pakistan has been stepped up to earn international sympathy and shift the focus away from the real problem. Given its track record, the conjecture may not be wide off the mark. The point is the terrorist originations in Pakistan may be down for the time being in view of the military operation against them but surely they are not out. Even today they are whisking away the youth from relief camps. The suicide attacks across the length and breadth of Pakistan are a chilling message that Pakistani state has to travel a long distance before it can claim to eradicate terrorism from the country. | |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
800 terror cells in India, says Narayanan |
2008-08-14 |
In a revelation that exposes deep roots of terror in India, national security advisor M K Narayanan confirmed the unearthing of 800 terror cells by intelligence agencies. These terror units, he said, were operating with external support -- an apparent reference to ISI-backed terror outfits like the LeT, Jaish e Mohammad and Huji (Bangladesh). "We are concerned that there is a great deal of external inspiration and support, we are also concerned and are looking at a mastermind within the country," Mr Narayanan is quoted as having told a Singapore newspaper in an interview. The reference to the 'local mastermind' is significant in the backdrop of investigations into the recent Bangalore and Ahmedabad blasts pointing to the role of home-grown jihadi organisations like Simi. The assessment that the blasts may have been carried out by a local terror module is based on findings pointing to the use of locally-sourced and assembled explosives and absence of any radio intercepts of conversations between bombers and their possible handlers in Pakistan or Bangladesh. Mr Narayanan said intelligence agents had disrupted several modules, some of which are "not entirely foreign." "Clearly, there is some kind of organisation we have to find out if that organisation is localised or there is an external group or module operating," he said. Although he did not elaborate, the security agencies believe that Indian Mujahideen, the outfit that owned up to the blasts in Ahmedabad and Jaipur, may just be another name for Simi. Simi, banned under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, has a trackrecord of having extended logistical support to LeT, Jaish and Huji for several terror attacks over the last few years, including the 7/11 Mumbai local train blasts. Though agency reports on Mr Naryanan's interview were silent on the time- period over which these 800 terror modules were busted, the figure is nevertheless shocking as even the NDA government, which had tougher laws to deal with terror, had busted no more than 300 ISI-backed terror modules during its rule between 1996 and 2004. On February 8, 2008, this year, minister of home for state Sriprakash Jaiswal had, in reply to a question raised in Parliament, put the number of total terror modules busted across the country over the last 3 years at 30. Of this, 10 were busted in his home state of UP. Speaking on the new trends in terror acts here, Mr Naryanan pointed to bombing of a hospital in Ahmedabad during the serial blasts that rocked the city last month. |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Terrorists trading on bourses |
2007-02-15 |
NEW DELHI: Terrorists are not only getting tech-friendly but market-savvy as well. A good part of terror funds is being sourced from manipulation of the bourses, particularly the Mumbai and Chennai stock exchanges, through fictitious or notional companies, according to National Security Adviser M K Narayanan. The NSA, who made this revelation during his address to the 43rd conference on security policy held last week in Munich, said many of the fictitious companies found to be engaging in stock market operations were traced to terrorist groups. Isolated instances of terrorist outfits manipulating the stock markets to raise funds for their operations have been reported. Stock exchanges in Mumbai and Chennai have, on occasions, reported that fictitious or notional companies were engaging in stock market operations, news agencies here quoted Mr Narayanan as having told his counterparts in Munich. Also expressing deep concern at the transfer of terror funds through valid banking channels from Dubai and UAE for use by groups like Jaish e Mohammad and Hizbul Mujahideen, Mr Narayanan stressed on the need to lift banking secrecy and the corporate veil to facilitate proper investigation of terror-related cases. Terrorist groups, he said, generally make small transactions to avoid detection. Use of both real and fraudulent ATM cards has also been resorted to at times, he added. Security agencies have detected many instances of funds received via banking channels from so-called safe locations like Dubai and UAE that were intended for terrorist groups, he noted. Squarely blaming certain official agencies in Pakistan for pumping millions of dollars for militancy in India, he said jehadi groups had started to establish a network of legitimate businesses to fund their activities. The terrorist groups are involved in legally running restaurants, real estate agencies and shipping firms and use their proceeds for their terrorist activities. Among terrorist outfits, said Mr Narayanan, the LTTE has a very well-established network of legitimate business, which provides both funds as well as logistics for their activities. Jehadi terrorist organisations have begun to follow suit. |
Link |
India-Pakistan |
Afzal was a terrorist linked to Jaish says his brother |
2006-11-27 |
Amid the pleas for clemency on behalf of Parliament attack accused and death row convict Afzal Guru, his elder brother, Aijaz in a sensational disclosure claimed that Afzal was a terrorist linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed, according to a CNN-IBN special investigative report. The news channel has claimed that the entire truth in the Parliament attack case never reached the courts or the public, and that both Afzal and the police were 'dishonest'. The police never presented Aijaz as a witness. Aijaz has also claimed on camera that Afzal never surrendered. "I surrendered his weapon to the STF. Nobody knows this," he stated. The CNN-IBN investigation revealed that the J&K Special Task Force had intelligence that Afzal Guru was a conduit for Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Ghazi Baba. Despite knowing this, the STF admitted it did not keep track of Afzal after releasing him in 2000. Admitting this, DSP, Police Control Room, Jammu and Kashmir said: "Once Afzal was released, nobody kept a track of what he's up to. Soon after his release, he was involved in the Parliament attack case." Aijaz told the channel that, "The decision of the Supreme Court is right. I swear to God the truth is that Afzal was working for Jaish-e Mohammad. He was involved in the attack." Aijaz's admission is a big blow to the clemency-seekers who have claimed that investigating agencies and police fabricated evidence to prove Afzal's involvement in the Parliament attack. The news channel's probe also revealed a vital information that had never surfaced in the courts: That Afzal's younger brother, Hilaal was arrested along with Afzal. Hilaal told the channel that contrary to police claims, no recoveries were made from them. Hilaal, the only eyewitness against the police version, was never produced in Afzal's defense. This supported the claims of those campaigning for Afzal's clemency that he did not have a competent lawyer in the trial court. While Aijaz has denied that Afzal surrendered before the police, Afzal's wife Tabassum said she did have a surrender certificate but lawyers in the Sessions Court had lost it. But contradicting Tabassum's claims, SM Sahai, Inspector General, J&K Police says, "We have a record of the surrendered and I've not seen any claim being made that Afzal surrendered." The Supreme Court accepted that Afzal was a surrendered militant. The J&K Police say no. But the prosecution never used this against Afzal in his trial. Both Afzal and the police concealed this vital fact. IG SM Sahai says, "As per our investigation, this man was believed to have links with Ghazi Baba but we never got anything concrete against him so he was not detained or prosecuted." The channel claimed that in June 2000, Afzal was picked up and tortured by then Superintendent of Police, STF, Dravinder Singh. "Yes, I tortured him. We were informed that he could lead us to Ghazi Baba. His brother Aijaz said they'd help us capture Ghazi Baba," Singh said. The channel claimed that Aijaz promised to tip-off the STF about Ghazi Baba's whereabouts as a trade off for Afzal. Four years later in 2004, Ghazi Baba was killed in an encounter and Aijaz helped the STF identify him. Ironically, despite knowing that Afzal was in regular touch with Ghazi Baba, the STF did not mount continuous surveillance on him. And a year later, Afzal became an accused in the terrorist strike on Parliament. Dravinder Singh admitted that had the STF kept him under continuous surveillance - the attack on Parliament could have been prevented! The channel pointed out that in 2000, J&K STF identified Afzal as a Jaish-e-Mohammad operative, but the STF did not testify the same during Afzal's trial in court. The Supreme Court had said in its judgement that there was no evidence of Afzal being a member of a terrorist organisation. None of the 80 prosecution witnesses ever alleged that Afzal was in any way associated or belonged to any terrorist organisation. In his letters, Afzal alleged that the Delhi Police fabricated evidence against him. The contents of the letter, however, never came up in the trial. It is also clear that the security forces and investigating agencies have concealed information during Afzal's trial. There was mystery surrounding the existence of an alleged Jaish-e-Mohammad operative Tariq, who supposedly introduced Afzal to Mohammad. According to the Delhi Police, the two subsequently planned the attack. But the J&K STF denied there was anybody by the name of Tariq in their records. Amid all the controversies, one fact has never been disputed either by Afzal in his letters, or by those campaigning for his clemency, or by the police in Delhi and J&K that Afzal did bring Mohammad from Srinagar to Delhi. Mohammad was the terrorist killed in the Parliament attack. Yet, in this statement recorded in the trial court under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Afzal claimed he never identified the body of Mohammad. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia | |||||||||
Will Musharraf ban Jamaat-e-Islami and JUI? | |||||||||
2005-08-29 | |||||||||
My guess is no. The important people like to keep their options open by having all sorts of political groups hang around in case they prove useful in the future.![]()
The Awami National Party is a Pashtun leftist party, one opposed to Talibanisation and the Jihadis and close to America. It seems likely to be in the new Peshwar government. The Baluchi nationalists are also leftists opposed to Talibanisation, but they are also hostile to the Pak military so palms will probably be greased to make that work. | |||||||||
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia | |
Amnesty International Official Recounts Religious Strife in Pakistan | |
2005-02-05 | |
From the Pakistan Christian Post, answers given in an interview with Rehman Faiz, president of the Lahore unit of Amnesty International. He is active in promoting inter-faith dialogue in Pakistan and is the editor of the recently launched inter-faith journal Insight. .... Things began to change in the late 1970s, when general Zia ul-Haq come to power and used a particular sect for promoting his own goals. He was supported in this by the USA and Saudi Arabia, which shared common interests and objectives with the then Pakistani army establishment. At exactly the same time, the Shia Islamic revolution took place in neighbouring Iran, which had a major influence on the Shia population of Pakistan as well. Meanwhile, the establishment's support for the Deobandi sect as a sort of official Islam led, as a reaction, to the formation of the Tehrik-e Nifaz-e Fiqh-e Jaffria(TNFJ)in April 1979, by the Shias of Pakistan under the joint initiative of Mufti Jafar Hussain and Allama Syed Mohammad Rizvi. In order to display its strength, the TNFJ organised a massive demonstration of Shias in Islamabad in July 1980. It was the first demonstration of its type by the Shias in the history of the country. Following this, the Anjuman Sipah-e Sahaba (later called the Sipah-e Sahaba Pakistan or SSP) was set up in 1984, with the support of the then Pakistani establishment, in order to counter the rising force of certain Shia groups, who were said to have been backed by the Iranian intelligence. The sympathy of many Shias towards the Bhutto family helped set off alarm bells in the higher circles of the Pakistani government. Equally worried were forces like the USA and Saudi Arabia. Haq Nawaz Jhangvi, a semi-educated khateeb who had received his religious education at the Darul Uloom, Kabirwala and the Khair-ul Madaris, Multan, was the founder of the SSP. To begin with, the SSP was not a violent organization, but within a few years it merged as a brutal outfit, leading to a major escalation of Shia-Sunni violence. Outside forces also supported and funded Shia-Sunni discord to achieve their goals. This has been recognized by several Pakistani scholars themselves. The daily Nation, in a report published on 20 January, 1995,quoting a confidential report of the Home Department of Punjab, stating: "[Under Zia], the Saudi Government started backing the Deobandi school of thought and, in the wake of the Afghan war, supplied funds and arms to the Deobandis. Indirectly, the USA and a few other Western countries also supported the SSP to counter the growing Shia and Iranian influence in this region". .... The Mohajir Qaumi Movement [later renamed as the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM)] was set up in the 1980s by Altaf Hussain in order to counter the activities of the Sindu Desh movement under the late G.M. Syed, as well as to undermine the popularity of Benazir Bhutto and her Pakistan People's Party (PPP). When the MQM went out of the control of the establishment during the first term of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto (1988-90), the establishment tried to weaken Altaf Hussain's popularity amongst the Mohajirs by trying to divide the Sunni and Shia migrants from UP and Bihar. But after failing to do this, a splinter group of the MQM was set up, the MQM Haqiqi(Real)in order to counter the MQM. The SSP was armed, and its activists were trained and then inducted into Afghanistan in order to fight against the Russians. Among other Deobandi jihadi organizations involved in the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan were the Harkat ul-Jihad al-Islami(HUJI) and the Harkat-ul Mujahideen (HUM), which are considered to be the offspring of the SSP. Likewise, the Jaish-e Mohammad (JEM), which was formed in 2000 through an apparent division in the HUM. In 1988, the Iranian intelligence, it is said, encouraged the Shias of Gilgit in the Northern Areas to rise in revolt and demand the creation of a separate 'Karakoram' province for the Shias. General Zia inducted jihadi tribal hordes into Gilgit, where they carried out a large-scale massacre of the Shias. Moreover, the SSP of Punjab was allowed to open an office in Gilgit, to rally round the Sunnis in the area against the Shias. This resulted in the spread of sectarian terrorism to the Northern Areas, before which it had limited mainly to Punjab and the NWFP. Then, in 1994, Alaf Hussain's MQM re-organized itself in interior Sindh. To counter this, the SSP, which had been largely restricted to Punjab, was inducted into Sindh in order to reinforce the position of MQM (H). This resulted in the spread of sectarian terrorism to Sindh as well. .... As far as the current government is concerned, it appears to have taken some solid steps in a positive direction, including proscription of violent sectarian groups and imprisonment of many of their activists. This is one of the outcomes of the decision of General Pervez Musharraf to take part in the US led 'war against terrorism'. The decision has totally changed Pakistan's foreign policy, which has also impacted on the way in which Pakistan relates to Afghanistan and Iran, besides also having a positive influence on India-Pakistan relations. The current upsurge of sectarian violence, especially in Balochistan, does not seem related to any 'internal agenda' of the government. Such violence does not provide any strategic benefit to the government. On the contrary, it badly harms its own policy. To me it seems perhaps a result of the dejection that violent groups in Afghanistan and along the Pakistan-Afghan border are today facing. This may also be a reaction to what they see as Shia support to the USA, especially in Afghanistan and Iraq. Whatever the reason might be, it is the duty of the government of Pakistan to provide protection and security to all its citizens. Repeated violence of the same sort and at the same places clearly points to major loopholes in the governmental system and gross negligence, which need to be urgently addressed. .....
Madrasas have played a major role in the rise of Shia-Sunni sectarian intolerance in Pakistan. In 1947, there were around 245 madrasas in Pakistan. In April 2002, Dr. Mahmood Ahmed Ghazi, the Minister of Religious Affairs, put the number of madrasas in the country at 10,000, with some 1.7 million students. In an analysis paper for the Brookings Institution in 2001, P.W. Singer estimated the number of madrasas in the country at 45,000, although he did not cite any source for this. Both Shias and Sunnis have their own separate madrasas. Since the Sunnis form the majority of the population of Pakistan, Sunni madrasas are far more numerous. Among the Sunnis, the three major maslaks (schools of thought), the Deobandis, the Barelvis and the Ahl-e Hadith (Salafis), as well as the Jama'at-e Islami, have their own separate madrasas. The number of madrasas in the country increased rapidly during General Zia ul-Haq's rule (1977-1988). In the course of the war in Afghanistan against the Soviets, the United States sent in money, arms and ammunition to Afghan fighters, and much of this found its way to several madrasas. The Saudi organization, Harumain Islamic Foundation, is said to have generously helped the Ahl-e Hadith, because of which it emerged as a powerful force. The Lashkar-e Taiba, an organization that had been active in fighting in Afghanistan and Kashmir, is associated with the Ahl-e Hadith. In recent years, the influence of the Deobandis has also increased, as the Taliban were trained in their seminaries. It should be remembered that the number of Deobandi madrasas is the highest, and they are thought to be the basic source of manpower and resources for anti-Shia vehemence in Pakistan. .... Except for a very small minority, there are no social differences between common Shias and Sunnis. Hence, one can confidently claim that Shia-Sunni conflict is limited to a fraction of the ulema and some of their followers, and that it is not widespread and deep-rooted among the common people. .... In the early 1980s incidents of sectarian violence occurred primarily in the interior of Punjab, especially in the areas of Jhang, Multan, Bahawalpur, and Muzaffar Garh, etc.. However, with the passage of time it spread to other major cities such as Lahore, Rawalpindi, Faisalabad, Quetta and Sargodha. There have also been incidents of Shia-Sunni violence in Peshawar, Gilgit and Karachi. Today, the areas of acute sensitivity are Quetta, Jhang, Lahore, Faisalabad, Multan and Bahawalpur. ..... | |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia |
âReal MMAâ to support anti-MMA candidates in by-elections |
2004-04-23 |
Cracks are deepening within the six-party religious alliance, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal. The alliance has been beset with internal problems for the past year. The smaller component parties, especially Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam of Maulana Sami-ul Haq, are unhappy with the two bigger parties, the Jamaâat-e Islami and the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam of Fazlur Rehman. But things seem to be spinning out of control now. The JUI-S has decided not to support the MMA candidates in the upcoming by-elections on the vacant seats for the national and provincial assemblies. Instead, it wants to support those candidates who would promote âthe real causeâ for which the MMA had been set up two years ago, JUI-S sources have told TFT. âWe have decided not to support the MMAâs candidates and work for those who really deserve it and will help us in our cause to make Pakistan a true Islamic society,â says JUI-S deputy secretary general, Mufti Usman Yar Khan. A formal announcement to this decision will be made on Sunday (April 25) in the Difa-e-Pakistan convention of the JUI-S in Karachi in which most of the 36 parties and individuals from the erstwhile Milli Yakjehti Council and Difa-e-Afghanistan Council will participate, party leaders say. TFT reported two weeks ago that the JUI-S was planning to expand the alliance in order to break the monopoly of the two bigger parties. Insiders say it is likely to use the April 25 gathering to this purpose. The main, and for many political analysts, the only objective of the convention is to announce âanother MMAâ in the end. Interestingly, the JUI-S has already sent invitations for the convention to Imran Khanâs Tehrik-e-Insaf and General (Retd) Aslam Begâs Awami Qayadat Party. The party will also contact Hafiz Mohammad Saeedâs Jamaâat-ud Dawa (the reincarnated version of the banned Lashkar-e Taiba) and the proscribed Jaish-e Mohammad. A prominent presence at the convention will be the former DG-ISI, Lt-Gen Hameed Gul. A target rich environment. The local leaders of the banned Millat-e-Islamia Pakistan (reincarnated version of the banned Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan) say they will attend the convention. âYes, we have got a formal invitation from the JUI-S leadership and we will attend their convention in Karachi,â MIPâs provincial spokesman, Qari Shafiqur Rehman told TFT. According to him, participating in the convention should not be taken as his partyâs decision to join the JUI-Sâs MMA. But he made it clear that the party was not concerned about its legal status or the consequences of joining a mainstream alliance despite having been banned by the government. âIf a Shia banned group (Allama Sajid Naqviâs Tehrik-e-Islami) can be a component of the MMA and enjoy open support of Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Qazi Hussain Ahmed, why canât we be part of an allianceâ he says, adding: âThere is a precedent and our joining another religious alliance will not be a violation of law.â When TFT asked the JUI-S leaders about the MIP leaderâs opinion on this count, they backed him. On the other hand, the fact that a banned organisation is able to run for election means the JUI-S shouldnât have anything to worry about. JUI-S sources say their leaders met the Lashkar leader Hafiz Mohammad Saeed recently in Lahore where the proposal for inducting Dawa into a new alliance was discussed. The JUI-S leaders have also held meetings with General Hameed Gul. It looks like the "Real MMA" is going to be made up mostly of hardcore Deobandi/Wahabi parties, while the MMA will remain a party of all sects. Unless it disintegrates even further. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia | |
Al Aalmi: a mysterious group | |
2004-04-16 | |
Requires registration Harkat-ul-Mujahideen Al Aalmi, a splinter group of the outlawed Harkat-ul-Mujahideen of Fazlur Rehman Khalili, has been accused since 2002 of mounting various terrorist attacks. Its activists have been arrested in connection with two abortive attempts on General Pervez Musharrafâs life as well as the attack on the US consulate. It has also been accused of last weekâs car bomb blast ostensibly to disrupt the concert of Indian singer Sonu Nigam. In the last week police have arrested nine members of the alleged Al Aalmi group, including one of its most wanted militants Suhail Akhtar alias Mustafa. Officials say Mustafa was the contact who contracted and provided suicide bombers to different organisations. A few days before the recent arrest of Al Aalmi activists, some unknown militants attacked a makeshift police station in Gulistan-e-Jauhar and shot dead five policemen at point blank range. One of the cops was a Christian. Police officials suspect Al Aalmiâs hand in the attack. Similarly, Rangersâ officials believe the attack on one of their vehicles which killed a Rangersâ jawan and a passerby besides inuring three other Rangersâ personnel was also mounted by Al Aalmi members. The group is also being suspected in the major weapon catch in the outskirts of Karachi. The weapons included an 82 mm mortar which has a range of up to five kilometer. The same night the weapons cache was recovered, a car bomb near the DHA Golf Club killed one person and injured 11 others. Just two kms from the site of the blast, an Indian singer was performing for the Karachi audience. So what is Al Aalmi? Funnily, law enforcement agencies have nothing on the organisation in terms of literature or any other propaganda material, normally a staple of such groups. Is it a real group or is it a cover name for some other group? Al Aalmiâs name appeared about two years ago when Rangers arrested five religious extremists in connection with the suicide bomb blast outside the US Consulate on June 14, 2002. One of them was a bearded man Mohammad Imran Bhai. Rangersâ officials claimed Bhai was the amir of the group. Officials also said Al Aalmi was an offshoot of Khaliliâs HM after some HM cadres developed differences with Khalili and formed their own group. A few days later when TFT met with Imran Bhai in a courtroom and asked him about Al Aalmi, he said: â I am a member of Harkat-ul-Mujahideen. Al Aalmi is the product of Rangers and security agencies. There is no division in HM.â
| |
Link |
India-Pakistan | |||||||||||
Karachi killings reveal sectarian-jihadi nexus | |||||||||||
2003-10-12 | |||||||||||
The ongoing investigations in the recent killing of six Shiite SUPARCO employees reveal the hand of jihadi outfits active in the city since the US attack on Afghanistan. âWe donât know which jihadi outfit is involved but we have enough evidence by now to say confidently that the attack was carried out by some outlawed jihadi organisation,â senior investigator Akbar Arain told TFT.
| |||||||||||
Link |
India-Pakistan | ||
No half-measures on sectarianism | ||
2003-10-07 | ||
We have often editorialised on this issue and pointed out to the authorities that there is no real distinction between sectarian terrorists and the so-called jihadis. Since the militant groups fighting inside Afghanistan and Kashmir were Wahhabi-Deobandi, a free hand to them by the state meant they would also pursue a sectarian agenda. There is enough evidence to suggest that cadres of the so-called jihadi organisations also doubled, in many cases, as sectarian terrorists. For instance, it is futile to distinguish among groups like Harkat-ul Mujahideen, Jaish-e Mohammad, Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan and Lashkar-e Jhangvi as jihadi or sectarian. Putting jihadi and sectarian tags on one or the other is a futile, in fact downright dangerous, exercise. The Hazara Shia in Quetta had to endure two dastardly attacks which killed more than sixty and left over 100 injured. The Shia clerics categorically accused Jaish and LJ activists. At least one of them went to the extent of also obliquely blaming the Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam, the two factions of which are components of the Mutahidda Majlis-e-Amal. The general tendency so far has been to accuse the Indian RAW of perpetrating these attacks even as, in all cases where the police have managed to apprehend the terrorists, it is clear who they are and what groups they belong to. Such is the level of hatred now that following the killing of Shia Hazara, two Sunni boys were allegedly torn to pieces by a Shia mob, though the story never made it to the newspapers. While Daily Times could not get it corroborated by any official source, the incident is widely known in Balochistan. Regardless of its veracity, it hardly needs be emphasised that no decent society can allow this kind of violence to go unchallenged.
| ||
Link |