Bangladesh |
BNP banks on radicals |
2013-04-04 |
[Bangla Daily Star] The BNP is now eagerly looking to the outcome of the radical Islamist groups' April 6 long march which, party leaders say, will largely determine its next course of action to intensify the one-point movement to oust the government. BNP policymakers say that if Hefajat-e Islam, organiser of the long march, enforces nonstop hartal ... a peculiarly Bangla combination of a general strike and a riot, used by both major political groups in lieu of actual governance ... s from April 7 in case the government obstructs the march, the BNP-led alliance will also step up tougher agitations. Amid such a tense political situation, the main opposition party is preparing itself for a showdown on April 10 in the capital. Party chief ![]() Three-term PM of Bangla, widow of deceased dictator Ziaur Rahman, head of the Bangla Nationalist Party, an apparent magnet for corruption ... is expected to announce the next spell of anti-government agitation programmes on the day. "The prevailing political situation will dictate the type of the next agitation programmes," Khandaker Mosharraf Hossain, a BNP standing committee member, told The Daily Star yesterday. On lending support to Hefajat-e Islam's long march towards Dhaka, he said: "We have extended our support because the march certainly has its political impact." A series of hartals, road blockades and sit-ins like those by the Shahbagh protesters are under consideration of the BNP-led alliance, insiders say. "We have empowered BNP chief Khaleda Zia to decide the mode of agitation programme," Abdul Latif Nejami, chief of Islamic Oikya Jote, a component of the BNP-led alliance, told The Daily Star on Monday. BNP leaders expect the radical Islamist groups on some point will wage a movement to dislodge the government to realise their demands, as the government can in no way meet all those demands. And if that is the case, the BNP-Jamaat-led alliance will assure them of meeting all their demands, if voted to power, a BNP policymaker said, requesting anonymity. Salafist groups have a 13-point demand, including restoration of the phrase "absolute faith and trust in the Almighty Allah" in the constitution, enactment of a blasphemy law, scrapping the education and women development policies and harsh punishment to "atheist bloggers". |
Link |
Bangladesh |
Bangla Bad Guys shifting tactics |
2005-12-04 |
Members of Bangladeshâs secular judicial system in Gazipur and Chittagong were battered this week after three suicide bomb attacks left 11 dead, including two militants, and wounded more than 100 others in the worldâs third largest Muslim-majority nation. On Tuesday, two suicide bombers that police allege were members of Jamaat-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), or the Party of the Mujahideen, killed ten people, including lawyers and police, at the bar association building in Gazipur and a police checkpoint at the entrance to a courthouse in Chittagong. âThe threat of suicide terrorism has reached Bangladesh for a reason. You have to wonder why they have resorted to suicide bombing at this stage. Suicide bombing attracts a lot of attention in the media and it has a major impact and itâs very accurate,â Colonel Christopher Langton, a terrorism expert and the head of the Defense Analysis Department at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies told ISN Security Watch. A third suicide bomber survived the attack he launched on Thursday, but the device he detonated killed one person and injured more than 30 others just outside the chief government administrator's office and the courthouse in Gazipur during a national strike protesting the recent violence. The strike, which was called by the Supreme Court Bar Association in response to Tuesdayâs bomb attacks, resulted in the closure of courts, shops, schools, and private businesses. The country has been hit by a series of bomb attacks this year, including two attacks on the judiciary in October and early November that left four people dead, including two judges, and multiple attacks in August during which over 400 small bombs were detonated across Bangladesh, killing two people. Bangladesh, which came into existence in 1971 when Bengali East Pakistan seceded from its union with West Pakistan, is not unused to violence, but the latest suicide attacks mark a sinister turn in events. âThe suicide bomb attacks this week in Bangladesh are definitely an escalation and a change in tactics by JMB. Itâs the first-ever suicide bomb attack in Bangladesh and it makes the situation much more difficult. Itâs a different genre,â Ahmad Tariq Karim, Bangladeshâs former ambassador to the US and a diplomat with 30 years of experience, told ISN Security Watch on Friday. âThe timing and the targets are interesting with the focus on the judiciary,â said Karim, who is also a senior advisor for governance institutions at the Center for Institutional Reform in the information sector at the University of Maryland. âItâs possible that the attacks may be designed to paralyze the court system, with some 100-plus of their group [JMB] facing trials in the courts,â noted Karim. According to local media, Bangladeshi State Minister for Home Affairs Lutfuzzaman Babar said the cases against the JMB militants allegedly involved in the attacks in August would start after the vacation of the courts in January. So far, 154 cases against 116 individuals have been filed in connection with the detonation of 434 bombs in 63 districts on 17 August. âItâs eerily similar to whatâs been going on with the trial of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, with the attacks on his lawyers,â Karim added. The JMB was formed in 1998 in Bangladeshâs Jamalpur district, according to one regional security analyst who spoke to ISN Security Watch on condition of anonymity. The groupâs exact origins are vague, but it came to prominence in May 2002 when eight Islamic militants were arrested in Parbatipur, in the northern Dinajpur district. The militants were caught with 25 petrol bombs and documents detailing the outfitâs activities. Then in February 2003, the JMB allegedly carried out seven bomb attacks in the Chhoto Gurgola area of Dinajpur, in which three people were wounded. The government banned the JMB in February this year, after the group was linked to a series of bomb attacks on non-governmental organization offices, shrines, and entertainment events in the country. Leaflets bearing the groupâs name and calling for the introduction of Islamic law were found at all the bombsites. The leaflets in Bangladeshi and Arabic, which the group used to claim responsibility for attacks, also revealed the groupâs intentions. âWeâre the soldiers of Allah. Weâve taken up arms for the implementation of Allahâs law, the way the Prophet, Sahabis, and heroic Mujahideen have done for centuries. It is time to implement Islamic law in Bangladesh. There is no future with man-made law,â the leaflets stated. According to local media, the JMB is led by a triumvirate consisting of Maulana Abdur Rahman, a former activist of the Jamaat-e-Islami political party; Siddiqur Islam, who is also known as Bangla Bhai; and Dr. Muhammad Asadullah al-Ghalib, an Arabic language lecturer at the Rajshahi University. While Maulana Rahman is regarded as the spiritual leader of the organization, Siddiqur Islam (Bangla Bhai) is reportedly its âoperational chiefâ. Dr. Muhammad Asadullah al-Ghalib was arrested in February 2005 and charged with sedition. The other two leaders remain free. âThe JMB is an associated group of al-Qaida. Prior to October 2001, the JMB received significant al-Qaida assistance in training and finance,â Dr. Rohan Gunaratna, a Singapore-based terrorism expert, claimed in an interview with ISN Security Watch on Friday. Gunaratna is the author of the book, âInside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terrorâ. He is also head of the International Center for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, at Singaporeâs Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies at Nanyang Technological University. Some analysts have suggested that the JMB has within its ranks many men who left Bangladesh to join the battle against the former-Soviet Unionâs invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. âIt was always known by officials [in Bangladesh] that there was a large number of JMB, and many had participated in the conflict against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Over 1,000 of these fighters returned to Bangladesh,â Karim claimed. In April 2002, the Far Eastern Economic Review reported that after the fall of Kandahar in Afghanistan in late 2001, hundreds of Taliban and al-Qaida fighters arrived by ship from Karachi, Pakistan, to the Bangladesh port city of Chittagong. âThe JMB has a huge infrastructure of several thousand members throughout Bangladesh. Due to political considerations, the government is reluctant to target the group,â Gunaratna said. Bangladeshi Prime Minister Khaleda Zia won landslide election victory in October 2001 with a four-party alliance led by her Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP). The alliance includes the Jamaat-e-Islami and the Islamic Oikya Jote parties, both known for their support of Islamic fundamentalism, the Taliban, and al-Qaida. Observers largely agree that Jamaat-e-Islami collaborated with the military regime in Pakistan during the 1971 war that led to the creation of Bangladesh from Pakistan and continues to be close to Islamabad. Zia suffered a major embarrassment when Abu Hena, a member of parliament for the ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party, accused the four-party coalition government of sheltering and patronizing Islamic militants in an interview with the BBC last month. A number of killings blamed on the JMB have taken place in Henaâs parliamentary constituency in the western district of Rajshahi since last year. âIslamic militancy started to spread in Bangladesh soon after Jamaat-e-Islami came to power, riding on the BNP. The militants in fact did not exist four years ago,â local media quoted Hena as saying. The BNP moved quickly after Henaâs comments and announced that Zia, who is also the chief of the BNP, had cancelled Henaâs party membership âas a disciplinary action for his misconduct and for tarnishing the image of the partyâ. An anonymous source close to the government told ISN Security Watch on Friday that even if Jamaat-e-Islami had not been directly responsible for acts of terrorism, its very inclusion in government had encouraged radical Islamist groups to feel protected by the government to some degree. âThe current campaign could be designed to see if society and the government can be intimidated,â Karim said. âThe next stage would be to change the constitution [and bring in Sharia law] if their campaign [to intimidate society and the government] was successful,â Ambassador Karim added. Many Bangladesh observers say the current violent campaign will continue until Dhaka makes a more serious commitment to clamp down on the JMB and introduce reforms, although the escalation in the JMBâs tactics this week may prompt a serious rethink of official strategy. âThe JMB will continue to employ suicide as a tactic. The terrorist threat will escalate in the coming years in Bangladesh,â Gunaratna warned. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia |
Bangla Govt must cleanse Islamists within |
2005-10-06 |
ZAYD ALMER KHAN ![]() You would also excuse him for taking the prime ministerâs oft-repeated rebuke entirely in his stride â a case of âin one ear and out the otherâ, perhaps. Because even after so many bomb blasts since that first scolding he got, and more crucially after so much blackening of the governmentâs image nationally and the countryâs internationally, he remains, even if ostensibly so, the man in charge of the home ministry. Prime minister Khaleda Ziaâs kid-glove handling of Babar is symptomatic of the lethargy and benign indulgence that pervade her style of discharging the duty of governance. But as the country has suffered a succession of Islamist terrorist attacks, and with it repeated loss of credibility in a world where the hunt for Islamists and their breeding grounds is topmost on the lone superpowerâs agenda, it is perhaps high time that more is demanded from her administration than simple lip service. For starters, it is time to demand of the prime minister an explanation for Babar, a man of little if any credentials to fill the job even before his glaring failure to deliver once given the reins of law enforcement is taken into account, still remaining the state minister for home. Her empty words of admonition of Babar aside, Khaleda has done nothing of worth to prove wrong the widely held belief that her inability to âtouchâ Babar is because he enjoys the blessings of the BNPâs all-powerful kith-and-kin brigade who couldnât care less because easy money and the dream of inheriting power have become the end-all and do-all. Until the prime minister breaks out of her regal languor and throws her weight around, the public is left with no option but to believe as truth the innuendoes that the Young Turksâ grip on the apparatus of power that she presides over is strong enough for her to abdicate her obligation of governance so that kinfolk can scramble for the ruins that are left behind. But, it would seem, it is not only the younglingsâ gluttony for all things material and monetary that Khaleda is held ransom by. The events of the last few weeks suggest that the prime minister is also held to ransom by her partyâs greed for power that is manifested in its machinations to ensure an immediate return to it. Hence her blind eye towards repeated intimation, most often by her governmentâs own intelligence bodies, that the spread of the Islamist militancy that threatens our democratic polity today was not without patronisation from not one but two of the BNPâs alliance partners, and some leaders of the BNP as well. None of them got the boot they deserved. Such is the power of notoriety. In her first reference to the August 17 multiple blasts in a public speech â delivered in Jatiya Sangsad on September 8, 22 days too late â the prime minister claimed that the blasts were choreographed by quarters with a political agenda hidden behind the veil of Islamist terrorism. She couldnât have been more correct. But while Khaleda, as ever, was alluding to the Awami Leagueâs involvement in the blasts, news out of the Joint Interrogation Cell as well as magistratesâ courts recording confessions suggest that the political quarters linked to the Islamists were much closer to the BNPâs home. Here, perhaps, is the scope for a further, more crucial demand: that the prime minister deal with Islamist terror not just militarily, as her administration is doing now, but also politically â a cleansing of elements with militant links within her alliance partners inclusive. Thus far, the prime minister has shown no signs that she is willing to confront either the Islamic Oikya Jote or the Jamaat-e-Islami for their alleged links with Islamist militancy. While there was always a question of terror-friendliness hanging over the former, emerging evidence increasingly suggests that the scale on which militants are operating in the country has been made possible by the latterâs patronage. The Jamaat, of course, carries with it the legacy of both the killer regime of collaboration in 1971 and the decades-long murderous excesses of its student front that has only recently decided to take on a slightly more gentrified look. In fact, calculating as they have proven to be, it would not be a surprise to anyone if Jamaatâs own currently gentrified state proves a mere camouflage for getting a stake in state power. The suggestions of militant links could yet be manifestations of their true colours. Whether Jamaat decides to shed the disguise any time soon or not, the question is if Khaleda Zia is ready to risk her alliance partner catapulting a so-called Islamic revolution while riding on her back. As it stands now, she seems either oblivious to the threat, or comfortable with the calculation that the vote bank the Jamaat pulls in for now far outweighs the threat it poses to the democratic polity in the long run. But she should be advised that the Jamaat threat is a matter that will weigh heavily on the minds of her electorate come election time, especially if terrorist acts continue at will from now till then. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia |
Anti-Ahmadiyya moves engineered by Jamaat and 'foreign hand' |
2005-05-02 |
A top Ahmadiyya leader yesterday said that Jamaat-e-Islami, a key component of the ruling coalition, is the brains behind the countrywide Khatme Nabuwat movement to ban the sect. "Originated in the undivided India, Jamaat is trying to establish the ideology of its leader Syed Abul Ala Moududi to brand us non-Muslim," said Prof Meer Mobashwer Ali, Ahmadiyya Nayeb National Amir. He also claimed they have evidence that a neighbouring Muslim country has been using its agencies to incite hatred towards the Ahmadiyyas in Bangladesh. "Moududi's ideology, which became Jamaat's principles in Pakistan, had succeeded in creating situations that led to violence against Ahmadiyyas, and grabbing state power and implementing sharia law there," Prof Mobashwer told the media in an interview yesterday. "They are following the same ideals here in Bangladesh to attain the same goal." The Ahmadiyya leader noted that the recent atrocities on the Ahmadiyyas are part of a design plotted by a top leader of Islamic Oikya Jote, who wants to drive a hard bargain with the BNP in the next parliamentary election. Continues Prof Ali: "Bangladesh is not Pakistan where the fundamentalists succeeded in labelling us as non-Muslims. Our country came into being on the basis of a liberal cultural heritage having no room for bigotry." The Ahmadiyya issue has been put forth to jeopardise the very base of the nation, he said, adding, "Our people are not orthodox, they are rather simply pious and moderate." He criticised the major political parties for not lending the Ahmadiyyas support during the recent spate of attacks on them, and said, "No major political party stood by us fearing loss of votes, although none of them ideologically supports violence against any particular sect." "Ours is a non-political, peace-loving, and totally religious community. We seek help of Allah and Allah only for our safety, security and protection. We believe that we are close to Allah and He will never fail to glorify his ardent followers." BDNEWS, meanwhile, reported yesterday that Prof Mobashwer had claimed to have evidence that Pakistan has been using its intelligence -- Inter Services Intelligence -- through its high commission in Dhaka to help bigots run the anti-Ahmadiyya campaign. The news agency, however, said Pakistan High Commission Press Minister Sajida Iqbal Syed 'dispelled the allegations and said the Pakistan mission has no involvement with such activities'. "Pakistan does not believe in interference in other country's internal affairs," BDNEWS quoted Sajida as saying. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia |
Bangladesh dismisses NYT report, sez it's all lies, lies, lies |
2005-01-26 |
Dhaka yesterday dismissed a report published in the New York Times (NYT) Magazine headlined 'The Next Islamic Revolution?" as one-sided, baseless and politically motivated. Bangladesh's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury has already sent a rejoinder to the NYT refuting the allegations in the story, saying it is 'baseless, partial and misleading'. "We are saddened that the report is one-sided. It would not be unusual for the motive behind this report to be political," said Zahirul Haq, director general of the foreign ministry's external publicity wing. "Nearly 1,400 foreign journalists visited Bangladesh in the last three years. Reports by only three or four of them have been regrettable," Haq said referring to a portion of the January 23 report that claims, "Foreign journalists in Bangladesh are followed by intelligence agents; people that reporters interview are questioned afterwards." The report narrates, "It is possible to travel through Bangladesh and observe the increased political and religious repression in everyday life. The global war on terror is aimed at making the rise of regimes like that of the Taliban impossible, but in Bangladesh, the trend could be going the other way." Referring to such statements Haq said, "The NYT reporter came a long way but failed to portray the real picture of Bangladesh," adding, "To suggest Bangladesh is becoming a Taliban country is humorous at best and is the result of ill-motives." He termed the report's allusion to government collusion with Bangla Bhai and his organisation -- Jagrata Muslim Janata -- motivated and said, "The first secretary of US Embassy in Dhaka visited the area mentioned in the report and found no consolidated existence of Bangla Bhai following there." "Bangla Bhai gained the support of the local police -- until the central government, worried that Bangla Bhai's band might be getting out of control, ordered his arrest in late May," reads the report. The author, Eliza Griswold, a freelance writer, also says in her report, "The Bangladeshi government's arrest warrant doesn't seem to have made much difference, although for now Bangla Bhai refrains from public appearances." On these points, Haq said the government is determined to tackle these issues and has already arrested 66 operatives of Bangla Bhai. "The author of the report chose a single village, Bagmara, out of the 70,000 villages here. The situation there does not represent all of Bangladesh," he added. The report says, "Last Spring, Bangla Bhai, whose followers probably number around 10,000, decided to try an Islamist revolution in several provinces of Bangladesh that border India." But Haq questioned the very credibility of the report: "Since there is a question mark in the headline, it suggests the author herself is not clear and confident about the subject matter." "It is not right to judge a country on the basis of one aberration," he added. The report also says the ruling coalition partner Jamaat-e-Islami is "socially conservative and unafraid of violence," and referring to the coalition's incumbency it adds, "Since 2001, a politically aggressive form of Islam has found, for the first time since independence, a strong place at the top of Bangladeshi politics." The report quotes coalition leader and Islamic Oikya Jote Chairman Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini as saying in an interview that he had not been appointed as a government minister as the West and Bangladesh would see him as an extremist. The report also cites Indian intelligence documents to suggest that Amini is a member of the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (Huji) and says Huji is linked to Al-Qaeda and that there are rumours that Amini is a 'good friend' to the Afghan Talibans. Refuting such claims Haq said, "This report has saddened us, but it will not be able to tarnish the international image and fame of Bangladesh." The report also quotes Amnesty International's Bangladesh specialist Govind Acharya as saying Hindus, Ahmadiyyas and tribal peoples are leaving the country feeling less safe, a phenomenon problematic for the identity and the future of this country. The author alleges that the permissiveness of certain sections of the government and the police allow Bangla Bhai and 'other groups' to continue repression of the minorities and communists. But Haq rejected all these claims saying, "The people of Bangladesh are committed to democracy and Bangladesh has achieved great progress in social indicators highly appreciated in the international forum." He added that Bangladesh's active participation in that forum means its image would not be damaged so easily. |
Link |
Afghanistan/South Asia |
The Next Islamist Revolution? |
2005-01-25 |
Edited for length Last spring, Bangla Bhai, whose followers probably number around 10,000, decided to try an Islamist revolution in several provinces of Bangladesh that border on India. His name means ''Bangladeshi brother.'' (At one point he said his real name was Azizur Rahman and more recently claimed it was Siddiqul Islam.) He has said that he acquired this nom de guerre while waging jihad in Afghanistan and that he was now going to bring about the Talibanization of his part of Bangladesh. Men were to grow beards, women to wear burkas. This was all rather new to the area, which was religiously diverse. But Jagrata Muslim Janata Bangladesh, as Bangla Bhai's group is called (the name means Awakened Muslim Masses of Bangladesh), was determined and violent and seemed to have enough lightly armed adherents to make its rule stick. Because he swore his main enemy was a somewhat derelict but still dangerous group of leftist marauders known as the Purbo Banglar Communist Party, Bangla Bhai gained the support of the local police -- until the central government, worried that Bangla Bhai's band might be getting out of control, ordered his arrest in late May. The Bangladeshi government's arrest warrant doesn't seem to have made much difference, although for now Bangla Bhai refrains from public appearances. The government is far away in Dhaka, and is in any case divided on precisely this question of how much Islam and politics should mix. Meanwhile, Bangla Bhai and the type of religious violence he practices are filling the power vacuum. In Bangladesh, ''Islam is becoming the legitimizing political discourse,'' according to C. Christine Fair, a South Asia specialist at the United States Institute of Peace, a nonpartisan, federally financed policy group in Washington. ''Once you don that religious mantle, who can criticize you? We see this in Pakistan as well, where very few people are brave enough to take the Islamists on. Now this is happening in Bangladesh.'' The region, Fair added, has become a haven where jihadis can move easily and have access to a friendly infrastructure that allows them to regroup and train. This was not supposed to be the fate of Bangladesh, which fought its way to independence 34 years ago. While its population of 141 million is 83 percent Muslim, the nation was founded on the principle of secularism, which in Bangladesh essentially means religious tolerance. After the guiding figure of independence, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, was assassinated in 1975, military leaders, seeking legitimacy, allowed a return of Islam to politics. With the return of fair elections in 1991, power became precariously divided among four parties: the right-leaning Bangladesh National Party (B.N.P.), the mildly leftist Awami League, the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami and the conservative Jatiya. The two leading parties are led by women: the B.N.P. by the current prime minister, Khaleda Zia, widow of the party's murdered founder; the Awami League by Zia's predecessor as prime minister, Sheikh Hasina Wazed, herself the daughter of the assassinated founding father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Zia and Sheikh Hasina, as she is known, have a legendary antipathy toward each other. Each of their parties regularly accuses the other of illegal acts. The political breach between those two parties is being filled primarily by Jamaat-e-Islami, which agitated against independence in 1971 and remains close to Pakistan. The group was banned after independence for its role in the war but has slowly worked its way back to political legitimacy. The party itself has not changed much -- it was always socially conservative and unafraid of violence. The political context, however, has changed enough to give it greater power. Since 2001, Jamaat-e-Islami has been a crucial part of a governing coalition dominated by the B.N.P. The two parties have ties dating to the late 1970's, but it is only since 2001 that a politically aggressive form of Islam has found, for the first time since independence, a strong place at the top of Bangladeshi politics. It's a sad story the way that the collaborators of the JI, who fought alongside the Pakistani Army against their own people in the name of Islamic solidarity, have been able to return to power, lead by the same men who killed thousands of Hindus and independence supporters. By the early 1990's Islamist groups began appearing, mainly at the periphery of the jihad centered on Afghanistan. The most important of these has been the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (Huji), which has been associated with Fazlul Rahman, who signed Osama bin Laden's famous declaration in 1998 endorsing international, coordinated jihad -- the document that introduced Al Qaeda to the larger world. But Bangla Bhai's group and others have since emerged and are making their bids for power. Six years ago, Huji chose its first prominent target: Shamsur Rahman, who is Bangladesh's leading poet. Rahman has lived under police protection since Jan. 18, 1999, when three young men appeared at his house and asked for a poem. Immediately one of the men ran upstairs and tried to chop Rahman's neck with an ax. ''He tried to cut my head off, but my wife took me in her arms and my daughter-in-law too,'' Rahman recounted. The two women fended off the blows until the neighbors, hearing their screams, rushed into the house and caught the attackers. The attack led to the arrest of 44 members of Huji. Two men, a Pakistani and a South African, claimed they had been sent to Bangladesh by Osama bin Laden with more than $300,000, which they distributed among 421 madrassas, or private religious schools. According to Gowher Rizvi, director of the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard and a lecturer in public policy, bin Laden's reputed donation is ''a pittance'' compared with the millions that Saudi charities have contributed to many of Bangladesh's estimated 64,000 madrassas, most of which serve only a single village or two. Communists are just one target of Islamic militants in Bangladesh. Most attacks have been carried out against either members of religious minorities -- Hindus, Christians and Buddhists -- or moderate Muslims considered out of step with the doctrines espoused at the militant madrassas. International groups like Human Rights Watch cannot gather information freely enough to be certain of the scope of the problem. Yet anecdotal evidence is abundant. In Bangladesh, as part of the militant Islamists' agenda, religious minorities are coming under a new wave of attacks. One of the most vulnerable communities is that of the Ahmadiyya, a sect of some 100,000 Muslims who believe that Muhammad was not the last prophet. In Pakistan, the Ahmadiyya have been declared infidels and many have been killed. In Bangladesh, religious hardliners have burned mosques and books and pressured the government to declare the sect non-Muslim. Last year, the government agreed to ban Ahmadiyya literature; earlier this month, however, Bangladesh's high court stayed the ban pending further consideration by the court. The Ahmadiyya are hardly the only group at risk. ''For the Hindus, the last couple of years have been disastrous,'' says Ali Dayan Hasan of Human Rights Watch. ''There are substantial elements within the society and government itself that are advancing the idea that Hindus need to be expelled.'' On the ground, attacks against Hindus include beatings and rapes. In this environment, Bangladesh's radical leaders have ratcheted up their ambitions. Responding to the American invasion of Afghanistan, supporters of the Islamic Oikya Jote (I.O.J.), the most radical party in the governing coalition and a junior partner to the Jamaat-e-Islami, chanted in the streets of Chittagong and Dhaka, ''Amra sobai hobo Taliban, Bangla hobe Afghanistan,'' which roughly translates to ''We will be the Taliban, and Bangladesh will be Afghanistan.'' The I.O.J. is considered a legitimate voice within Bangladeshi politics. The I.O.J.'s chairman, Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini, who has served as a member of Parliament for the past three years, says he believes that secular law has failed Bangladesh and that it's time to implement Sharia, the legal code of Islam. Amini is the author of books in Arabic, Bangla and Urdu. (He learned Urdu while completing graduate work in a madrassa in Karachi, Pakistan.) I did some searching and was completely unsurprised to find that the Karachi madrassa he attended was Binori town, formerly run by Mufti Shamzai, and the source of the leadership level of the Deobandi Jihadist movements. The mufti has been named in Indian intelligence documents as a member of the central committee of Huji (itself linked to Al Qaeda), an association he would, of course, deny. He is also rumored to have close friends among the Afghan Taliban, which he denies, while adding that it's better not to discuss the Afghan Taliban, as they are so frequently misunderstood. Outside his office, the sound of boys' voices reciting the Koran rises and falls. Fifteen hundred students study at the madrassa, and the mufti's party, the I.O.J., sponsors madrassas all over the nation; how many, he claimed not to know. Financing, the mufti said, comes mostly from Bangladesh itself, but some money also arrives from friends throughout the Arab world. Of all his political influence, the mufti is most proud of his fatwas, which, he said, give him a means to speak out against those who violate Islam. ''Whoever speaks against Islam, I issue a fatwa against them to the government,'' he said. ''But the government says nothing.'' He shook his head, frustrated. That's next on his agenda: to pressure the government to recognize his religious injunctions. ''It's possible,'' he said, ''now more than ever.'' It appears the IOJ serves as a branch of Pakistan's JUI-F, just as Bangladesh's JI answers to Pakistan's JI. The former being Deobandis, the latter being more akin to the Muslim Brotherhood. |
Link |