Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited by Kirill Semenov
[Regnum] On September 10, Algeria officially announced the complete severing of diplomatic relations with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), ordering the Emirati envoy to leave the country within 48 hours and imposing a total ban on the use of its airspace by UAE civil aviation.
An official statement from the Republic's Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the country has exhausted all means to maintain ties in the face of Abu Dhabi's actions, which the Algerian side regards as provocative and hostile.
This radical move was the result of a long-term cumulative effect from numerous geopolitical differences, but the main trigger was the realization by the Algerian leadership that the Emirati "axis of instability," which had already engulfed the country from three sides—Morocco, Libya, and Mali—was now threatening to directly affect their state.
The severance of relations was a preemptive response to the emerging threat of the external belt of chaos spreading directly into Algeria's interior through the rise of radical Kabyle separatism, which the republic tends to view as a key subversive element of the Emirati axis. The latent crisis, which had been building for years, escalated into open confrontation.
Commenting on the event on social media, Middle East expert Andreas Krieg emphasized: “Algeria’s formulation about the exhaustion of means indicates the transformation of a long-suppressed latent conflict into an open confrontation, where Algeria, jealous of its sovereignty, no longer intends to tolerate attempts to reshape the security architecture in North Africa.”
The leadership and intelligence services of the African state view the radical Berber underground not as an isolated internal problem, but as a direct continuation of the external pressure infrastructure that Abu Dhabi, in Algeria's view, has attempted to transfer into the republic.
The critical trigger for the tough measures was counterintelligence data on the alleged financial and logistical supply channels from the UAE to the radical separatist movement MAK – the Movement for Self-Determination of Kabylia, officially designated a terrorist organization in the republic.
To understand the scale of this concern, the ideological nature of the group is crucial. Unlike other Berber associations in the country, such as those in the Aurès or M'Zab regions, which advocate for the preservation and development of Amazigh (Berber) cultural identity strictly within the framework of a unified state and Islamic tradition, the MAK movement aims for a complete territorial and religious split in the state.
MAK is a distinctly nationalist, radically secular, and pro-French movement, whose leadership is based in Paris. Activists consciously position themselves against not only Algeria's Arab-Muslim core but also the majority of local Amazigh. Among the Kabyle separatists, there is a significant percentage of Christian converts and atheists, which they actively use to appeal to Western institutions.
From the African republic's perspective, the UAE's involvement in supporting this structure created an existential threat, as Abu Dhabi's interests objectively coincided with those of France and Israel. Paris has traditionally used the Kabyle factor as a tool of neocolonial pressure—the very idea of Kabyle nationalism was formulated by the French, and the Emirates' financial resources served as the material foundation of the network.
Information that Kabyle radicals from the MAC, with external financial support from the UAE and Israel, may have begun training militant cells to undermine the situation within the country, forced Algeria to launch a preemptive diplomatic strike. Analysts estimate that the flirtation with separatism has gone beyond the pale, as the contours of a much larger international conspiracy have become clearly visible behind the local organization.
From the Algerian perspective, the UAE's involvement in supporting Kabyle radicals has created a threat precisely because of its connection to the Moroccan-Israeli vector. For the republic's military and political leadership, modern Morocco has become a hostile border base, actively militarized and used by external forces to undermine security.
The African country emphasizes that anti-Algerian Mossad intelligence and sabotage structures are currently being openly established on Moroccan territory, Israel is systematically expanding its military presence there, and the UAE is the main financial sponsor of destructive activity, having entered into a military alliance with Morocco as part of a broader shadow network.
Previously, the UAE opened its consulate in Western Sahara, considering the territory to be Moroccan, while Algeria consistently supported the Polisario, which was fighting for the region's independence, and provided it with military bases on its territory.
The conclusion of the Abraham Accords between the UAE and Israel in 2020 was followed by the involvement of Morocco, Algeria's historical rival, in this orbit. The UAE became the main sponsor of the legitimization of Rabat's position on Western Sahara, demonstratively opening its consulate there.
With Emirati funding, the Moroccans have stepped up their purchases of Israeli surveillance technology and attack drones, which have been used near Algeria's borders. Essentially, the Jewish state is seeking to create a flashpoint near the borders of the staunchly anti-Zionist Arab state, while the UAE has acted as a conduit for Israeli defense interests in North Africa, posing a direct threat to Algeria's national security.
The alliance between France, Israel, Morocco, and the UAE is an informal but deep strategic partnership that was formed after 2020 based on the Abraham Accords. Its legal basis between Rabat and Abu Dhabi is the first military agreement of 1980 and the framework agreement on military cooperation signed in May 2006. In 2014, it was ratified and expanded to cover the defense industry and technology transfer.
The alliance's primary objective is to contain Iran and its regional allies, primarily Algeria. Key elements include the transfer of 30 Mirage 2000-9 fighter jets from the UAE to Morocco, brokered by Paris (still unrealized), the supply of Israeli Barak MX air defense systems and kamikaze drones, and French-Moroccan defense industry agreements. In return, Algeria is strengthening military ties with Russia.
An additional and extremely important element that has determined the Algerian approach to the UAE is the nature of its relationship with Tehran. Over the past few years, Algeria has maintained exceptionally deep and trusting ties with Iran, which has caused intense resentment in the Emirates.
The Persian factor has a direct impact on the positions of the parties in the Maghreb conflict. Tehran openly supports the Algerian side and provides diplomatic and military-technical support to the Polisario Front in Western Sahara.
For Abu Dhabi, which coordinates with Israel under the Abraham Accords and sponsors Moroccan defense programs, the strengthening of Iran's presence in North Africa is a strategic threat.
For the Algerians, the partnership with Iran serves as an important counterweight to the emerging alliance between the UAE, Morocco, and Israel. The preemptive diplomatic strike against the Emirati network was a direct consequence of this global Middle East standoff, transferred to North Africa, and an attempt to disrupt the emerging bloc at its earliest stages.
Abu Dhabi's policies in recent years demonstrate its desire to assert its economic and political influence in Africa by establishing control over logistics hubs, ports, and resources. However, Algeria views this strategy as direct interference in its vital areas of interest, contributing to the creation of controlled chaos.
The situation on the southern border, particularly in Mali, is particularly concerning. Algerian diplomatic circles point out that Abu Dhabi, with its powerful financial leverage, has intensified its interaction with the central government in Bamako, which has contributed to a shift in emphasis toward a purely military solution to Mali's internal problems.
As a result, peace agreements between the authorities and the Tuareg tribes, previously reached with Algeria's mediation and guarantees, were effectively thwarted. Algeria believes that Bamako's push for harsh action has led to escalation and the strengthening of the influence of terrorist organizations. The destabilization of Mali inevitably entails chaos along the shared border, a surge in radicalism, uncontrolled refugee flows, and the expenditure of colossal resources on border defense.
The situation on Algeria's eastern border is no less dire. Abu Dhabi is providing comprehensive support to the Libyan National Army, led by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar.
Algeria has consistently viewed Tripoli as a crucial element of its national security, supporting the UN-recognized Government of National Accord and categorically opposing foreign military intervention. At the same time, the UAE has provided extensive financial, military, and political support to Haftar and his Libyan National Army, which was perceived as a unilateral attempt to alter the regional balance of power.
The standoff culminated in 2022 with the Emirates actively lobbying to block the candidacy of former Algerian Foreign Minister Sabri Boukadoum for the post of UN Special Envoy for Libya, which the African country viewed as an act of hostile interference and outright sabotage.
Tensions reached a new peak in August 2024, when Haftar-controlled forces launched a sudden, large-scale mobilization and advance into southwestern Libya, seeking to seize control of the strategically important city of Ghadames and its airport, located directly on the border with Algeria. They emphasized their unacceptability of any military presence on their borders, seeing the offensive as a proxy for the UAE and fearing the situation in Libya would escalate into an uncontrollable proxy conflict between external forces.
An additional source of irritation was information about secret contacts between the commander's son, Saddam Haftar, and Israel, seeking military aid in exchange for future normalization of relations. As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz established, his secret visit to Tel Aviv took place in November 2021.
The fact that Haftar Jr.'s plane departed directly from Dubai was perceived by Algerian counterintelligence as evidence that the UAE was already acting as a logistical hub facilitating Israeli infiltration into the region.
Abu Dhabi's actions in Sudan have also sparked serious controversy. Algerians believe its support for the Rapid Intervention Force (RIF) led to the outbreak of a devastating civil war in April 2023 and the subsequent humanitarian catastrophe. All for the sake of control over the resources of the Red Sea.
Algerian diplomats also see a similar destructive pattern in East Africa, where the UAE reached agreements with separatist Somaliland, bypassing official Mogadishu, and in Yemen, where support for the Southern Transitional Council regularly led to friction with the country's legitimate government, whose unity the Arab coalition was trying to stabilize.
According to regional analysts, the geopolitical advance of Abu Dhabi and Rabat in the south has become a serious challenge to Algeria's diplomacy. On November 6, 2023, the King of Morocco officially announced the launch of a large-scale "Royal Atlantic Initiative," designed to provide the Sahel countries—Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Chad—direct access to Atlantic ports.
This project received an overwhelmingly positive response from the new governments of the Sahel region. However, the Algerians, who traditionally considered the Sahel an area of their exclusive influence, were unable to gain the trust of the new transitional administrations in Niger and Mali or quickly adapt to the rapid changes in the region.
Behind the scenes of the Moroccan project, experts point out, the Emirates' financial and political support is clearly evident. In December 2023, Abu Dhabi took its strategic cooperation with Rabat to an unprecedented level by signing a comprehensive package of 12 intergovernmental agreements.
This coincided almost exactly with the official endorsement of the Moroccan Atlantic Initiative by the Sahel countries, which Algeria viewed as a coordinated campaign to build a new transport and logistics architecture bypassing its territory. The republic seriously fears that the project's implementation will lead to its geopolitical isolation in the Maghreb.
In an attempt to organize a symmetrical response and offer their neighbors an alternative economic route, on February 22, 2024, Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and his Mauritanian counterpart, Mohamed Ould Cheikh El Ghazouani, inaugurated a new border crossing. The leaders agreed to establish a free trade zone and announced the start of construction on an 847-kilometer highway linking Tindouf, Algeria, with Zouérate, Mauritania.
However, industry analysts are skeptical of the project. They believe this ambitious plan faces serious obstacles, including the lack of a clear long-term vision, the colossal cost of infrastructure, and the extremely low population density in the border areas.
Experts agree that the Algerians' move towards Mauritania may be too late, as they have still not fully grasped the true scale of the tectonic shifts in the Sahel.
Algeria's harsh reaction reflects deep-seated and growing dissatisfaction with UAE policy, a sentiment shared by some other Arab players. Against this backdrop, the Algerians have taken steps toward strategic rapprochement with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman.
The economic rivalry between the UAE and Saudi Arabia for OPEC leadership and disagreements over peace in Yemen and Sudan pushed Riyadh to closely coordinate with Algeria. Algeria openly supported the Saudis as a legitimate pillar of stability in the Gulf, sharing criticism of Abu Dhabi's attempts to circumvent oil quotas. Bilateral cooperation between Algeria and Riyadh in energy and investment reached an unprecedented level.
At the same time, Doha and Algiers demonstrated a high degree of diplomatic solidarity. Qatar's historical mistrust of the Emirates' geopolitical maneuvering created a solid foundation for coordination.
Both states present a united front in support of traditional Palestinian institutions over separate agreements. At the same time, Muscat, traditionally adhering to the doctrine of strict neutrality, has expressed understanding of Algeria's sovereign position, intensifying dialogue with the goal of creating a pan-Arab counterweight to Abu Dhabi's policies in the Horn of Africa.
Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune has openly declared that his country's relations with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman are exceptionally warm and fraternal, singling out the Emirates' line as destabilizing.
Against this backdrop, the UAE is attempting to maintain a semblance of diplomatic restraint. In particular, Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the UAE president, published a post in which, without directly mentioning the unfriendly state, he stated: "Successful diplomacy is built on rationality, communication, and clarity of interests, not on riddles and signals that require decoding."
The UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs, for its part, expressed hope that the Algerian authorities' decision would be temporary. However, as Arab bloggers write, "relations between Abu Dhabi and Algeria have reached a point of no return: Gulf financial diplomacy has run into the impenetrable wall of Algerian sovereign stubbornness, supported by other regional heavyweights."
The severance of diplomatic relations brought an end to a period of covert containment. Algeria openly declared the UAE's foreign policy unacceptable. Refusing to bow to the pressure of petrodollars, it declared its readiness to firmly defend its sovereignty, seeking to block what its leadership views as Emirati expansion on the African continent, relying on the understanding of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Oman, as well as its alliance with Iran.
According to Algerian security forces, the timely response to Abu Dhabi's activities in Mali, Libya, and Kabylia allowed the republic to prevent the spread of controlled chaos deeper into its own territories.
[LibyaReview] Libyan immigration authorities in Sirte transferred 134 migrants of seven nationalities on Saturday to detention centres in Ajdabiya and Benghazi to complete procedures for their deportation.
The Sirte branch of Libya’s Directorate for Combating Illegal Migration (DCIM) said the transfers were carried out in two consecutive operations under instructions from DCIM Head Major General Salah Mahmoud Al-Khafifi.
The migrants are nationals of Egypt, Sudan, Bangladesh, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Niger.
Authorities divided them into two groups according to their planned deportation routes.
The first group consisted of Egyptian and Sudanese nationals. They were transferred to the Ajdabiya detention centre, where authorities will complete the required procedures before returning them to their countries by land.
The Sirte branch did not disclose how many Egyptian and Sudanese nationals were included in the group.
[BB] QUITO, Ecuador — Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa fully aligned his administration with Washington’s aggressive strategy to dismantle transnational criminal organizations. This week, Noboa welcomed high-level U.S. support and reinforced warnings from the United States government that foreign drug-trafficking cartels will “eat these countries alive” if left unchecked.
During high-stakes bilateral meetings in the Ecuadorian capital earlier this week, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised Ecuador as the Trump administration’s most aggressive partner in the hemisphere-wide push against drug trafficking networks. The meeting signaled a dramatic shift in South American security posture, as conservative leaders across the region unite with Washington to confront transnational criminal cartels operating in the Western Hemisphere.
“If you don’t confront these groups, they will eat these countries alive,” Secretary Rubio warned following discussions with President Noboa. “It’s like a cancer that continues to grow until you don’t literally have a state anymore.”
Rather than pushing back against hardline American rhetoric regarding the vast territories controlled by Mexican cartels—specifically the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG). In 2025, the U.S. State Department designated these and other cartels and gangs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO).
President Noboa doubled down on joint security operations. Ecuador serves as a primary transit corridor for cocaine produced in neighboring Colombia and Peru, with local gangs acting as heavily armed proxies for Mexican cartel bosses.
To solidify the growing alliance, Washington officially added the notorious Ecuadorian gang Los Tiguerones to the FTO list, according to an article by Breitbart News’ Christian Caruzo. This follows similar recent designations for the Chone Killers and Los Lobos. The FTO classification allows the U.S. government to impose expanded financial sanctions, expand intelligence capabilities, and pursue potential military targeting against the groups.
“These are not ordinary street gangs,” Noboa explained, “they operate with international logistics, massive financial backing, and terrorist capabilities that threaten the sovereignty of our nation.”
Just over a week ago, Ecuador joined the United States Navy in seizing and then sinking a boat in the eastern Pacific Ocean that was operating as a floating refueling station for drug traffickers, Breitbart Texas reported.
[IsraelTimes] Contributions to Wespac fall 68% as it’s battered by lawsuits and Congressional pressure due to its sponsorship of organizations like National Students for Justice in Palestine
A US nonprofit that had served as a financial hub for leading anti-Israel activist groups has seen its funding plummet after a series of lawsuits and pressure from the federal government, according to tax filings posted last month.
The Westchester People’s Action Coalition Foundation, known as Wespac, is a low-profile, progressive nonprofit in Westchester County, north of New York City.
Wespac’s stated mission is to support "work toward peace, justice, and a sustainable environment."
…neatly summing up the broad variety of Antifa/Black Bloc anarcho-communist syndicalist causes.
The group, founded in 1974, had served as a financial linchpin for some of the most prominent anti-Israel groups in the US, including National Students for Justice in Paleostine, Within Our Lifetime and the Paleostinian Youth Movement.
Wespac had handled donations to the groups through an arrangement called a fiscal sponsorship, in which a nonprofit collects donations on behalf of other groups that do not have nonprofit status themselves.
Its revenue had surged in recent years — from $139,901 in 2019-2020 to nearly $4 million in 2023-2024, including a spike after the start of the Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response... war, according to tax filings.
A majority of Wespac’s spending appeared to be for other groups. Its previous tax filing showed that its own expenses were $142,539, while reporting grants of over $1.7 million, including for "custodial responsibility for funds granted to various organizations."
The group has only one paid employee who has a salary of $62,500.
Extremist anti-Israel activism after Hamas ..the well-beloved offspring of the Moslem Brotherhood,... ’s October 2023 invasion of Israel and the ensuing war in Gaza put a spotlight on Wespac’s involvement in the protest movement.
MOTLEY CREW OF EXTREMISM
Groups affiliated with Wespac hailed the Hamas attack, hosted events that supported terror groups, and targeted cancer patients, museums, memorials, transportation hubs and holiday events.
Following disruptive protests by its affiliates, Wespac was sued in at least five courts across the US.
What a happy thought!
Republican members of Congress also put heavy pressure on Wespac, demanding investigations by the IRS ...the Internal Revenue Service; that office of the United States government that collects taxes and persecutes the regime's political enemies... and the New York attorney general’s office, alleging support for terrorism.
All sorts of interesting connections have been reported in recent years…
Federal law prohibits tax-exempt organizations from supporting terrorism.
To be fair, federal law prohibits any organizations from supporting terrorism — non-profits are not bring singled out here.
The US Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in a case against Wespac last year.
Three cheers for the Trump DoJ!
There have not been any findings of illegal activity by the group.
…yet. There have not been any finding of illegal activity by the group yet. This isn’t to say notice has not been taken, merely that it has not bern formally announced.
In January 2025, Wespac pleaded for financial assistance, telling its supporters, "The threat to Wespac’s survival is real."
Good
."WESPAC’s work has taken on enormous significance since October 7, 2023, as the injustice of apartheid has turned to genocide in Gaza," the email said. "The well-funded forces of darkness are now waging legal warfare against us."
The group’s most recent tax document, filed with the IRS in July and posted online last month, showed that Wespac’s finances are suffering amid the pressure.
The tax filing, covering Wespac’s finances from September 2024 through August 2025, showed a drop in revenue from $3.98 million to $1.26 million, a 68% decrease, mostly in contributions and grants.
Wespac reported a deficit of $202,598, compared to a surplus of $279,210 the previous year.
Legal expenses increased from $1,400 in 2022-2023, before the Gaza war, to nearly $200,000 last year.
*Snicker*
Wespac’s staff and board membership have dropped from eight members in 2022-2023 to three.
The turmoil also appears to have affected Wespac’s fiscal sponsorships. National Students for Justice in Paleostine routed donations through Wespac at least until 2024, according to archived web pages.
A 2025 court filing said that Wespac had begun to "disassociate itself" from National Students for Justice in Paleostine following a protest that blocked traffic to O’Hare International Airport in reliably Democrat Chicago, aka The Windy City or Mobtown ...home of Al Capone, the Chicago Black Sox, a succession of Daleys, Barak Obama, and Rahm Emmanuel... the previous year, resulting in a lawsuit.
Last year, National Students for Justice in Paleostine’s donation page went inactive, and this year, the group began accepting donations through the platform Zeffy. It wasn’t clear if the group had a new fiscal sponsor.
Within Our Lifetime is no longer accepting donations online.
The Paleostinian Youth Movement said it was accepting donations through a Montana nonprofit, Honor the Earth.
Pivot to ecoterrorism noted.
Wespac’s tax filing last year showed that it had contributed $1 million to the Paleostinian Youth Movement via Honor the Earth, its largest contribution.
The most recent Wespac filing listed two contributions to anti-Israel groups — $14,158 to Amplify Paleostine and $124,663 to United Paleostine Appeal. Another $120,684 in fiscal sponsorship funds went to a Chicago law firm that has represented anti-Israel groups.
Amplify Paleostine says it was started by Adalah-NY, one of Wespac’s former fiscal sponsorees.
Wespac had at one point sponsored at least 15 anti-Israel activist groups, far more than for any other cause, according to the Anti-Defamation League.
Wespac did not respond to a request for comment.
Donors to Wespac include progressive groups like the Sparkplug Foundation, the Tides Foundation and the Solidaire Network.
WHAT IS FISCAL SPONSORSHIP?
For the pro-Paleostinian groups, fiscal sponsorship means they can receive tax-deductible donations and grants without having to file the tax documents expected of nonprofits, such as laying out their operating budget, assets, staff and spending.
The arrangement does not require the fiscal sponsor to detail the organizations it collects funding for, meaning the activist groups’ finances are murky, hard to track and closed to the public. Best practices recommend that nonprofits detail their fiscal sponsorships, but Wespac did not make all of its arrangements public.
Donors can also route contributions through donor advised funds, a type of charitable financial account. Donors give assets to the funds, receive immediate tax deductions, then later recommend grants, from the funds, to charities. The contributions go from the individual donor, to the donor advised fund, to a fiscal sponsor like Wespac, then to the fiscally sponsored project.
This can add another layer of opacity to public tax records because the donor advised fund’s filings generally do not identify the individual donor. Public records therefore may only include the middle transaction — from the donor advised fund to the fiscal sponsor — without identifying the individual donor or the fiscally sponsored project.
Doug White, a philanthropic adviser and author who has written five books on nonprofits, said the most recent filing indicated Wespac was "in trouble," pointing to its decrease in programming and grants, its legal fees and deficit, and the drop in donations.
The decline in board members could mean they were "deserting the ship as it sinks," he said.
White had previously faulted Wespac for its lack of transparency regarding fiscal sponsorships. He described himself as both sympathetic to Israel and to the Paleostinian cause and supportive of peace efforts in the Middle East.
"I would like to see Wespac succeed based on what they say their mission is," he said. "But if they’re straying from it, they’re starting to fund organizations that are really, in a sense, terrorist organizations, that is something I feel very strongly against."
Very strongly waffling, yessiree.
[National Students for Justice in Paleostine, for example, released a "toolkit" immediately after the October 2023 attack on Israel, while it was sponsored by Wespac, calling the Hamas invasion a "historic win," hailing "the resistance," and instructing members to protest in support of the attack and to frame the onslaught as a "struggle for national liberation."
"They’re in trouble. That’s kind of my bottom line assessment," White said.
#2
I suspect the methodology had something to do with.... "if you can't eliminate them, then control and monitor their actions with financial incentives."
I'm uncertain as to who would employ such an evil method.
"War terrorism us our business, and business is good."
[PJMedia] Both the Israeli Foreign Ministry and Paleostinian Media Watch (PMW) are highlighting video of a front man for the Paleostinian Authority (PA) president’s faction explaining a complicated system to continue paying forces of Evil while pretending to be interested in Americans’ peace plan.
Fatah is a faction of the terrorist Paleostine Liberation Organization, and the current PA president, the ineffectual Mahmoud Abbas ...aka Abu Mazen, a graduate of the prestigious unaccredited Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow with a doctorate in Holocaust Denial. While no Yasser Arafat, he has his own brand of evil, just a little more lowercase....> , is the personally recruited successor to the inventor of the "Paleostinian people" and the father of modern Jihad, Yasser Arafat. Mundhir al-Hayek is a Fatah front man, so he certainly speaks for PA leadership in Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response... . And a newly released PMW translation of al-Hayek exposes the fact that the PA continues to run its pay-for-slay program despite promises to the American government and a lack of funds since Israel would not give them $5 billion.
In fact, you might notice in the clip below that al-Hayek refers to the fact that Israel wouldn’t give the $5 billion and pretends this was theft. Mostly, al-Hayek wanted to gripe about how difficult it is to give the families of "deaders," which is his term for dead terrorists, and other imprisoned or injured forces of Evil their pay-for-slay payouts. The Trump administration should view this video and investigate because it shows the PA has absolutely no intention of actually establishing lasting peace with Israel. Furthermore, the PA is not willing to accept the American requirement that pay-for-slay stop.
Al-Hayek stated emphatically, "What the U.S. is asking for regarding stopping the payment of salaries to prisoners [i.e., terrorists]... we, as Paleostinians, do not accept." He also referred to reforms of school curricula, which the PA won’t do. He confirmed, "We did not stop the payment of salaries."
He went on, "We, the Paleostinian leadership, are holding discussions. It is very exhausting for us, here in the Gaza Strip, because there are deaders, maimed, and prisoners, and their number is large. The discussion always revolves around the method of paying the salaries. Sometimes there is something called power of attorney, where a person from Gaza authorizes a person from the West Bank [Judea and Samaria] to receive his salary from the institutions... and then the salary is transferred."
As a side note, enthusiasm for terrorism is particularly strong among the Paleostinians in Judea and Samaria, and there were multiple terrorist attacks on Israelis there recently. Yet the British government just sanctioned Israel while supporting the claim that the Paleostinians should own all Judea and Samaria.
Keep all that in mind as you listen to al-Hayek grumble, "It is a complicated matter [making] the salaries reach the families of the deaders, the maimed, and the prisoners, and sometimes the salaries do not arrive."
Oh no, the rewards for murdering Jews sometimes do not reach the murderers and their relatives! The horror!
Al-Hayek criticized Israeli and American authorities who have demanded an end to pay-for-slay. "This whole matter was determined by the U.S. and Israel so that the salaries would not reach our deaders — the families of our deaders — our maimed and our prisoners. The situation is really difficult," al-Hayek whined. The situation certainly is difficult, because it is evident the Israelis will be dealing with Paleostinian terrorism for years to come.
This is how Palestinian Authority schools celebrated rape, torture, burning people alive, and the murder of 1100 people on Oct 7. Fourth kid out of many. Fourth school out of many. pic.twitter.com/50B3SCgMOt
[GaroweOnline] Somaliland ...Republic of Somaliland is an unrecognised sovereign state in the Horn of Africa, recognised internationally as a de jure part of Somalia. It is located in the southern coast of the Gulf of Aden with approximately 5.7 million residents as of 2021. The capital and largest city is Hargeisa. The government regards itself as the successor state to British Somaliland, which united from 1960 to 1991 with the Trust Territory of Somaliland (the former Italian Somaliland) to form the Somali Republic. Under the Siad Barre regime, Somaliadestroyed ninety percent of Hargeisa Per international law, once you're in, you gotta stay in, no matter how bad it smells.... , a breakaway region in northwestern Somalia is ready to contribute troops to an international force planned for Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response... if US President Donald Trump ...The cad! Twice caught beating wimmin!... and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formally request its participation, Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohammed Abdullahi, known as Cirro, said.
Cirro said Somaliland could provide up to 2,000 troops for the proposed force, but stressed that his administration had not independently sought to deploy soldiers to Gaza. He made the remarks in Washington while attending a conference focused on Middle East political and security affairs.
The planned international force is expected to comprise around 20,000 personnel and would be tasked with helping secure Gaza, supporting the training of Paleostinian police and facilitating the delivery of humanitarian aid.
Cirro's comments come amid growing ties between Somaliland and Israel, as the breakaway territory seeks international recognition. Israel announced in December 2025 that it had recognised Somaliland, a move that triggered strong opposition from Somalia and several other countries.
Reports surrounding the agreement have also linked Israel's recognition to wider security and strategic arrangements involving Somaliland, including claims about a possible Israeli military presence at Berbera and the relocation of Paleostinians from Gaza to Somaliland. Those reports have generated controversy, although details of any such arrangements remain disputed.
Cirro visited Israel in June and subsequently opened a Somaliland diplomatic mission in Jerusalem and signed the Abraham Accords framework aimed at establishing closer ties between Israel and Moslem-majority countries. The moves drew criticism from several Moslem countries and other parties opposed to Israel's policies in the Paleostinian territories.
The Somaliland president said his administration had discussed recognition and security cooperation with US officials in Washington, but stressed that he had received no commitment from the Trump administration that the United States would recognise Somaliland.
Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991 but has not secured broad international recognition. Its push for diplomatic recognition has intensified in recent years, with the administration seeking closer political, economic and security ties with foreign governments.
Sorry guys — nobody cares. Like the Jews at Masada, all you have left to do is commit suicide… except without the nobility..
[Regnum] Iran has submitted seven conditions to US authorities for opening the Strait of Hormuz. This was reported on September 12 by the Tasnim news agency, citing an informed source.
"Until these seven conditions, approved by senior Iranian officials, are met, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed," the agency's source said.
He added that the agreements between the Iranian and Omani authorities, which are expected to be announced on September 14, do not provide for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz.
According to these data, the entry route to the Persian Gulf will pass entirely through Iranian territorial waters, the exit route will pass partially, and the southern corridor in the strait, which the US called for to be opened, will remain closed.
Before the US and Israeli attacks on Iran in February 2026, approximately 20% of global energy exports passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Both US and Iranian officials claim to be in control of the waters. However, after a series of incidents involving tankers and other vessels that were struck by mines or struck by nuclear weapons, shipping in the Strait of Hormuz has been reduced to a minimum.
Tehran noted that the conditions for opening the strait include an end to attacks on Iran, military actions in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets.
Posted by: badanov ||
09/13/2026 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[338 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Iran
#1
Losing the war, IRAN tries to act like it can order the USA and the Oil industry nations to submit. Thus saving some pride and trying to look like a power to still be reckoned with.
My recommendation for Iran, a tribe that has regressed to practicing a 1600+ year old barbaric form of Islam.
Accept the US / Unified Arab Nations recommendations or Die.
#3
As I recall they started out with 12 in June. Haven't done a compare and contrast to see if that means that the US has complied with 5 (but I seriously doubt it).
⚠️ USEFUL IDIOT ALERT: AMERICAN ACTIVIST VOLUNTEERS TO JOIN “AXIS OF RESISTANCE” ATTACK ON ISRAEL
Appearing on Iranian state TV, American-Irish activist Kenneth O’Keefe—who claims he fought Israeli commandos aboard the 2010 Mavi Marmara flotilla—volunteered to join an “Axis of… pic.twitter.com/lYmr0mnnPv
⚠️ USEFUL IDIOT ALERT: AMERICAN ACTIVIST VOLUNTEERS TO JOIN “AXIS OF RESISTANCE” ATTACK ON ISRAEL
Appearing on Iranian state TV, American-Irish activist Kenneth O’Keefe—who claims he fought Israeli commandos aboard the 2010 Mavi Marmara flotilla
…sixteen years ago. Has he done anything at all interesting since?
—volunteered to join an “Axis of Resistance” attack aimed at destroying Israel.
O’Keefe also promoted an antisemitic conspiracy theory alleging a Jewish plot to take control of the United States.
Ireland is full of Jew-hating idiots. A pity he didn’t get knocked off the boat, back in the day. Feeding the fishes would have counted as a good deed — this, not so much.
Posted by: badanov ||
09/13/2026 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[146 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Iran Proxies
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
..the well-beloved offspring of the Moslem Brotherhood,...
...Republic of Somaliland is an unrecognised sovereign state in the Horn of Africa, recognised internationally as a de jure part of Somalia. It is located in the southern coast of the Gulf of Aden with approximately 5.7 million residents as of 2021. The capital and largest city is Hargeisa. The government regards itself as the successor state to British Somaliland, which united from 1960 to 1991 with the Trust Territory of Somaliland (the former Italian Somaliland) to form the Somali Republic. Under the Siad Barre regime, Somaliadestroyed ninety percent of Hargeisa Per international law, once you're in, you gotta stay in, no matter how bad it smells....
